Income Taxes	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	Income Taxes For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the company recorded income tax expense of $24.6 million, compared to income tax expense of $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in the company’s tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relative to the prior year relates primarily to an election made by the company with the Internal Revenue Service in the third quarter of 2014 to treat Enodis Holdings Ltd., the company’s UK holding company, as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result of this status change, the company recorded a $25.6 million capital loss tax benefit. The tax expense increase is also attributable to one-time tax costs caused by the company’s spin off of the Foodservice business. The company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates. The company will continue to periodically evaluate its valuation allowance requirements in light of changing facts and circumstances, and may adjust its deferred tax asset valuation allowances accordingly. It is reasonably possible that the company will either add to, or reverse a portion of its existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future. Such changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances will be reflected in the current operations through the company’s income tax provision, and could have a material effect on operating results. In the second quarter of 2015, management determined that it was more likely than not that deferred tax assets of $4.2 million related to its Brazilian crane manufacturing operations would not be realized and recorded a valuation allowance. The company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $33.8 million as of September 30, 2015, and $33.3 million as of December 31, 2014. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that $3.4 million of the unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate. The company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. As of September 30, 2015, the company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and the results of operations and cash flows. However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.

Income Taxes

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the company recorded income tax expense of $24.6 million, compared to income tax expense of $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in the company’s tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relative to the prior year relates primarily to an election made by the company with the Internal Revenue Service in the third quarter of 2014 to treat Enodis Holdings Ltd., the company’s UK holding company, as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result of this status change, the company recorded a $25.6 million capital loss tax benefit. The tax expense increase is also attributable to one-time tax costs caused by the company’s spin off of the Foodservice business. The company’s effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates.

The company will continue to periodically evaluate its valuation allowance requirements in light of changing facts and circumstances, and may adjust its deferred tax asset valuation allowances accordingly. It is reasonably possible that the company will either add to, or reverse a portion of its existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future. Such changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowances will be reflected in the current operations through the company’s income tax provision, and could have a material effect on operating results.

In the second quarter of 2015, management determined that it was more likely than not that deferred tax assets of $4.2 million related to its Brazilian crane manufacturing operations would not be realized and recorded a valuation allowance.

The company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $33.8 million as of September 30, 2015, and $33.3 million as of December 31, 2014. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that $3.4 million of the unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate.

The company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. As of September 30, 2015, the company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and the results of operations and cash flows. However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.