10-Q 1 land_093017x10qdocument.htm 10-Q
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)

ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
or

¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-35795
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

MARYLAND |  | 54-1892552
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |  | I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE 100 MCLEAN, VIRGINIA |  | 22102
Address of Principal Executive Offices |  | Zip Code

(703) 287-5800
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code
Not Applicable
Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer | ¨ |  |  | Accelerated filer | x
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company | x
Emerging growth company | ¨ |  |  |  |

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý.
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of November 6, 2017, was 13,637,938.

Table of Contents
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | PAGE
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited): |
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 | 3
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 | 4
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 | 5
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 | 6
| Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 27
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 47
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures | 47
PART II | OTHER INFORMATION |
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings | 48
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors | 48
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 48
ITEM 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 48
ITEM 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 48
ITEM 5. | Other Information | 48
ITEM 6. | Exhibits | 49
SIGNATURES | 50

Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
(Unaudited)

| September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016
ASSETS |  |  |
Investments in real estate, net | $ | 444,390 |  |  | $ | 326,311 |
Lease intangibles, net | 5,796 |  |  | 2,000 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 3,758 |  |  | 2,438 |
Deferred financing costs related to borrowings under line of credit, net | 209 |  |  | 239 |
Other assets, net | 2,407 |  |  | 2,997 |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 456,560 |  |  | $ | 333,985 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |  |  |
LIABILITIES: |  |  |
Borrowings under lines of credit | $ | 5,100 |  |  | $ | 16,550 |
Mortgage notes and bonds payable, net | 290,234 |  |  | 190,797 |
Series A cumulative term preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25.00 per share liquidation preference; 2,000,000 shares authorized, 1,150,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, net | 27,831 |  |  | 27,655 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 4,382 |  |  | 2,801 |
Due to related parties, net(1) | 984 |  |  | 751 |
Other liabilities, net | 9,043 |  |  | 7,654 |
Total liabilities | 337,574 |  |  | 246,208 |
Commitments and contingencies(2) |  |  |
EQUITY: |  |  |
Stockholders’ equity: |  |  |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 98,000,000 shares authorized, 13,485,025 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017; 18,000,000 shares authorized, 10,024,875 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 | 13 |  |  | 10 |
Additional paid-in capital | 126,848 |  |  | 90,082 |
Accumulated deficit | (17,801 | ) |  | (13,402 | )
Total stockholders’ equity | 109,060 |  |  | 76,690 |
Non-controlling interests in the Operating Partnership | 9,926 |  |  | 11,087 |
Total equity | 118,986 |  |  | 87,777 |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 456,560 |  |  | $ | 333,985 |

(1) | Refer to Note 6, “Related-Party Transactions,” for additional information.

(2) | Refer to Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for additional information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3

Table of Contents
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
(Unaudited)

| For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
OPERATING REVENUES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental revenue | $ | 6,561 |  |  | $ | 4,467 |  |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | $ | 12,388 |
Tenant recovery revenue | 3 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 8 |  |  | 8 |
Total operating revenues | 6,564 |  |  | 4,469 |  |  | 18,310 |  |  | 12,396 |
OPERATING EXPENSES: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,051 |  |  | 1,432 |  |  | 5,123 |  |  | 3,744 |
Property operating expenses | 257 |  |  | 161 |  |  | 747 |  |  | 545 |
Acquisition-related expenses | 22 |  |  | 123 |  |  | 68 |  |  | 243 |
Management fee(1) | 523 |  |  | 385 |  |  | 1,446 |  |  | 1,158 |
Incentive fee(1) | 261 |  |  | 22 |  |  | 688 |  |  | 181 |
Administration fee(1) | 211 |  |  | 184 |  |  | 656 |  |  | 575 |
General and administrative expenses | 374 |  |  | 356 |  |  | 1,208 |  |  | 1,150 |
Total operating expenses | 3,699 |  |  | 2,663 |  |  | 9,936 |  |  | 7,596 |
Credits to fees from Adviser(1) | (54 | ) |  | — |  |  | (54 | ) |  | — |
Total operating expenses, net of credits to fees | 3,645 |  |  | 2,663 |  |  | 9,882 |  |  | 7,596 |
OPERATING INCOME | 2,919 |  |  | 1,806 |  |  | 8,428 |  |  | 4,800 |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other income | 4 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 190 |  |  | 106 |
Interest expense | (2,634 | ) |  | (1,554 | ) |  | (6,984 | ) |  | (4,297 | )
Distributions attributable to mandatorily-redeemable preferred stock | (458 | ) |  | (219 | ) |  | (1,375 | ) |  | (219 | )
Loss on disposal of real estate asset | (78 | ) |  | — |  |  | (78 | ) |  | — |
Total other expense | (3,166 | ) |  | (1,771 | ) |  | (8,247 | ) |  | (4,410 | )
NET (LOSS) INCOME | (247 | ) |  | 35 |  |  | 181 |  |  | 390 |
Plus (less) net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests | 26 |  |  | (3 | ) |  | (23 | ) |  | (16 | )
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY | $ | (221 | ) |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 158 |  |  | $ | 374 |
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic and diluted | $ | (0.02 | ) |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | 0.04 |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic and diluted | 12,271,925 |  |  | 10,018,331 |  |  | 11,512,968 |  |  | 10,001,466 |

(1) | Refer to Note 6, “Related-Party Transactions,” for additional information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4

Table of Contents
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)

| Common Stock |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Number of Shares |  | Par Value |  | Additional Paid-in Capital |  | Accumulated Deficit |  | Non- Controlling Interests |  | Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015 | 9,992,941 |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 86,892 |  |  | $ | (8,895 | ) |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 78,007 |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 374 |  |  | 16 |  |  | 390 |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net | 31,934 |  |  | — |  |  | 350 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 350 |
Distributions | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (3,676 | ) |  | (234 | ) |  | (3,910 | )
Issuance of OP Units as consideration in real estate acquisitions, net | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 11,708 |  |  | 11,708 |
Adjustment to non-controlling interests resulting from changes in ownership of the Operating Partnership | — |  |  | — |  |  | 2,133 |  |  | — |  |  | (2,133 | ) |  | — |
Balance at September 30, 2016 | 10,024,875 |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 89,375 |  |  | $ | (12,197 | ) |  | $ | 9,357 |  |  | $ | 86,545 |
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 10,024,875 |  |  | $ | 10 |  |  | $ | 90,082 |  |  | $ | (13,402 | ) |  | $ | 11,087 |  |  | $ | 87,777 |
Net income | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 158 |  |  | 23 |  |  | 181 |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net | 3,410,150 |  |  | 3 |  |  | 38,420 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 38,423 |
Distributions | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (4,557 | ) |  | (568 | ) |  | (5,125 | )
Issuance of OP Units as consideration in real estate acquisitions, net | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Redemption of OP Units | 50,000 |  |  | — |  |  | 404 |  |  | — |  |  | (2,674 | ) |  | (2,270 | )
Adjustment to non-controlling interests resulting from changes in ownership of the Operating Partnership | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,058 | ) |  | — |  |  | 2,058 |  |  | — |
Balance at September 30, 2017 | 13,485,025 |  |  | $ | 13 |  |  | $ | 126,848 |  |  | $ | (17,801 | ) |  | $ | 9,926 |  |  | $ | 118,986 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5

Table of Contents
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

|  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |
Net income |  | $ | 181 |  |  | $ | 390 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 5,123 |  |  | 3,744 |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |  | 366 |  |  | 135 |
Amortization of deferred rent assets and liabilities, net |  | (189 | ) |  | (129 | )
Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | — |  |  | 72 |
Loss on disposal of real estate asset |  | 78 |  |  | — |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |
Other assets |  | 492 |  |  | (153 | )
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties |  | 541 |  |  | (273 | )
Other liabilities |  | 1,079 |  |  | 4,126 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |  | 7,671 |  |  | 7,912 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |
Acquisition of new real estate |  | (120,985 | ) |  | (69,174 | )
Capital expenditures on existing real estate |  | (3,438 | ) |  | (10,126 | )
Proceeds from sale of real estate |  | — |  |  | 156 |
Change in deposits on real estate acquisitions and investments, net |  | (865 | ) |  | (617 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  | (125,288 | ) |  | (79,761 | )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |  |  |  |
Proceeds from issuance of equity |  | 40,421 |  |  | 360 |
Offering costs |  | (1,962 | ) |  | (242 | )
Payment for redemption of OP Units |  | (2,270 | ) |  | — |
Borrowings from mortgage notes and bonds payable |  | 104,590 |  |  | 28,953 |
Repayments on mortgage notes and bonds payable |  | (4,663 | ) |  | (2,606 | )
Borrowings from lines of credit |  | 52,500 |  |  | 44,700 |
Repayments on lines of credit |  | (63,950 | ) |  | (22,300 | )
Proceeds from issuance of mandatorily-redeemable preferred stock |  | — |  |  | 28,750 |
Payment of financing fees |  | (604 | ) |  | (1,292 | )
Distributions paid on common stock |  | (4,557 | ) |  | (3,676 | )
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests in Operating Partnership |  | (568 | ) |  | (234 | )
Payment of contingent consideration |  | — |  |  | (700 | )
Net cash provided by financing activities |  | 118,937 |  |  | 71,713 |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |  | 1,320 |  |  | (136 | )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |  | 2,438 |  |  | 2,533 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |  | $ | 3,758 |  |  | $ | 2,397 |
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION: |  |  |  |
Issuance of non-controlling interests in operating partnership in conjunction with acquisitions |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 11,763 |
Real estate additions included in Other assets |  | 15 |  |  | — |
Real estate additions included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties |  | 1,140 |  |  | 390 |
Loss on disposal of real estate asset included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties |  | 23 |  |  | — |
Real estate additions included in Other liabilities |  | 506 |  |  | 809 |
Common stock offering and OP Unit issuance costs included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties |  | 237 |  |  | 31 |
Financing fees included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties |  | 54 |  |  | 59 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6

Table of Contents
GLADSTONE LAND CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. BUSINESS
Business
Gladstone Land Corporation (the "Company") is an agricultural real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that was re-incorporated in Maryland on March 24, 2011, having been previously re-incorporated in Delaware on May 25, 2004, and having been originally incorporated in California on June 14, 1997. We are primarily in the business of owning and leasing farmland, and we conduct substantially all of our operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Land Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership. The Company owned 91.7% and 87.4% of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership ("OP Units") as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively (see Note 7, "Equity," for additional discussion regarding OP Units). In addition, we have elected for Gladstone Land Advisers, Inc. ("Land Advisers"), a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, to be taxed as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS").
Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, and pursuant to contractual agreements, our business is managed by Gladstone Management Corporation (the “Adviser”), a Delaware corporation, and administrative services are provided to us by Gladstone Administration, LLC (the “Administrator”), a Delaware limited liability company. Our Adviser and Administrator are both affiliates of ours (see Note 6, "Related-Party Transactions," for additional discussion regarding our Adviser and Administrator).
All further references herein to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer, collectively, to Gladstone Land Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where indicated otherwise.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim Financial Information
Our interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of financial statements for the interim period have been included. The interim financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 21, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”). The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain line items on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously-reported stockholders’ equity, net income or net change in cash and cash equivalents.
Non-controlling Interests
Non-controlling interests are interests in the Operating Partnership not owned by us. We evaluate whether non-controlling interests are subject to redemption features outside of our control. As of both September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the non-controlling interests in the Operating Partnership are redeemable at the option of the holder for cash or, at our election, shares of our common stock and thus are reported in the equity section of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet but separate from stockholders’ equity. The amounts reported for non-controlling interests on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations represent the portion of income from the Operating Partnership not attributable to us. At the end of each reporting period, we determine the amount of equity (at book value) that is allocable to
7

Table of Contents
non-controlling interests based upon the respective ownership interests. To reflect the non-controlling interests' equity interest in the Company, an adjustment is made to non-controlling interests, with a corresponding adjustment to paid-in capital, as reflected on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make judgments that are subjective in order to make certain estimates and assumptions, and our application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment regarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. A summary of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K. There were no material changes to our significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" ("ASU 2014-09"), which was amended in each of March, April, May, and December of 2016. ASU 2014-09, as amended, supersedes or replaces nearly all GAAP revenue recognition guidance and establishes a new, control-based revenue recognition model, changes the basis for deciding when revenue is recognized over time or at a point in time and will expand disclosures about revenue. As deferred by the FASB in July 2015, ASU 2014-09, as amended, is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. We will adopt this guidance for our annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018, and expect to use the modified retrospective method, under which the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance is recognized at the date of initial application. We do not expect ASU 2014-09 to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition, as the primary impact of this update is related to common area maintenance and other material tenant reimbursements, whereas the majority of our revenue is from rental income pursuant to net-lease agreements, with very little being attributed to tenant recoveries.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842): An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee, which classification determines whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis, respectively, over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months, regardless of the classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 supersedes the previous leasing standard, Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 840, “Leases,” and is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We expect our legal expenses (included in General and administrative expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations) to increase marginally, as the new standard requires us to expense indirect leasing costs that were previously capitalized; however, we do not expect ASU 2016-02 to materially impact our condensed consolidated financial statements, as we currently only have two operating ground lease arrangements with terms greater than one year for which we are the lessee.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows, with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice related to certain cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this guidance for our annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)" ("ASU 2016-18"), which requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Under ASU 2016-18, amounts described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-18 to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business" ("ASU 2017-01"), which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting, including acquisitions and disposals. ASU 2017-01 is effective for
8

Table of Contents
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2017-01, effective October 1, 2016, and, as a result of our early adoption, all of our farmland acquisitions since our adoption have been treated as asset acquisitions under ASC 360, which has resulted in a lower amount of acquisition-related costs being expensed on our condensed consolidated statements of operations, as the majority of those costs have been capitalized and included as part of the fair value allocation of the respective purchase prices. We anticipate that the majority of our future acquisitions will continue to be treated as asset acquisitions under ASC 360, resulting in similar treatment of acquisition-related costs.
NOTE 3. REAL ESTATE AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
All of our farms are owned on a fee-simple basis, except where noted. The following table provides certain summary information about our 72 farms as of September 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes):

Location |  | No. of Farms |  | Total Acres |  | Farm Acres |  | Net Cost Basis(1) |  | Encumbrances(2)
California |  | 27 |  | 7,921 |  | 7,156 |  | $ | 202,181 |  |  | $ | 145,819 |
Florida |  | 17 |  | 11,225 |  | 9,027 |  | 117,549 |  |  | 76,072 |
Colorado |  | 9 |  | 30,170 |  | 23,257 |  | 41,812 |  |  | 24,686 |
Arizona(3) |  | 6 |  | 6,280 |  | 5,228 |  | 40,570 |  |  | 23,166 |
Oregon |  | 4 |  | 2,313 |  | 2,003 |  | 19,755 |  |  | 12,528 |
Nebraska |  | 2 |  | 2,559 |  | 2,101 |  | 10,667 |  |  | 6,602 |
Washington |  | 1 |  | 746 |  | 417 |  | 9,525 |  |  | 5,460 |
Michigan |  | 4 |  | 270 |  | 183 |  | 2,965 |  |  | 1,602 |
North Carolina |  | 2 |  | 310 |  | 295 |  | 2,308 |  |  | 1,301 |
|  | 72 |  | 61,794 |  | 49,667 |  | $ | 447,332 |  |  | $ | 297,236 |

(1) | Consists of the initial acquisition price (including the costs allocated to both tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed), plus subsequent improvements and other capitalized costs associated with the properties, and adjusted for accumulated depreciation and amortization. Includes Investments in real estate, net (excluding improvements paid for by the tenant) and Lease intangibles, net; plus net above-market lease values included in Other assets; and less net below-market lease values and deferred revenue included in Other liabilities, each as shown on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2) | Excludes approximately $1.9 million of deferred financing costs related to mortgage notes and bonds payable included in Mortgage notes and bonds payable, net on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3) | Includes two farms in which we own a leasehold interest via ground leases with the State of Arizona that expire in February 2022 and February 2025, respectively. In total, these two farms consist of 1,368 total acres and 1,221 farm acres and had a net cost basis of approximately $3.3 million as of September 30, 2017 (included in Lease intangibles, net on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet).

Real Estate
The following table sets forth the components of our investments in tangible real estate assets as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

|  | September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016
Real estate: |  |  |  |
Land and land improvements |  | $ | 356,015 |  |  | $ | 265,985 |
Irrigation systems |  | 48,750 |  |  | 33,969 |
Buildings |  | 17,790 |  |  | 14,671 |
Horticulture |  | 30,967 |  |  | 17,759 |
Other improvements |  | 6,244 |  |  | 4,993 |
Real estate, at cost |  | 459,766 |  |  | 337,377 |
Accumulated depreciation |  | (15,376 | ) |  | (11,066 | )
Real estate, net |  | $ | 444,390 |  |  | $ | 326,311 |

Real estate depreciation expense on these tangible assets was approximately $1.7 million and $4.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $1.2 million and $3.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
Included in the figures above are amounts related to improvements on certain of our properties paid for by our tenants but owned by us, or tenant improvements. As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we recorded tenant improvements, net of accumulated depreciation, of approximately $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. We recorded both depreciation expense and additional rental revenue related to these tenant improvements of approximately $61,000 and $150,000 for the
9

Table of Contents
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $31,000 and $98,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes the carrying values of lease intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

|  | September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016
Lease intangibles: |  |  |  |
Leasehold interest – land |  | $ | 3,498 |  |  | $ | — |
In-place leases |  | 1,523 |  |  | 1,481 |
Leasing costs |  | 1,511 |  |  | 1,086 |
Tenant relationships |  | 439 |  |  | 706 |
Lease intangibles, at cost |  | 6,971 |  |  | 3,273 |
Accumulated amortization |  | (1,175 | ) |  | (1,273 | )
Lease intangibles, net |  | $ | 5,796 |  |  | $ | 2,000 |

Total amortization expense related to these lease intangible assets was approximately $390,000 and $739,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $207,000 and $582,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
The following table summarizes the carrying values of certain lease intangible assets or liabilities included in Other assets and Other liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related accumulated amortization or accretion, respectively, as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands).

|  | September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016
Intangible Asset or Liability |  | Deferred Rent Asset (Liability) |  | Accumulated (Amortization) Accretion |  | Deferred Rent Asset (Liability) |  | Accumulated (Amortization) Accretion
Above-market lease values and lease incentives(1) |  | $ | 46 |  |  | $ | (21 | ) |  | $ | 19 |  |  | $ | (14 | )
Below-market lease values and deferred revenue(2) |  | (823 | ) |  | 108 |  |  | (785 | ) |  | 61 |
|  | $ | (777 | ) |  | $ | 87 |  |  | $ | (766 | ) |  | $ | 47 |

(1) | Above-market lease values and lease incentives are included as part of Other assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the related amortization is recorded as a reduction of rental income.

(2) | Below-market lease values and deferred revenue are included as a part of Other liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the related accretion is recorded as an increase to rental income.

Total amortization related to above-market lease values and lease incentives was approximately $4,000 and $7,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $2,000 and $5,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Total accretion related to below-market lease values and deferred revenue was approximately $17,000 and $47,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $9,000 and $24,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
Acquisitions
Until our adoption of ASU 2017-01, which clarified the definition of a business, certain acquisitions during the prior-year period were accounted for as business combinations in accordance with ASC 805, as there was a prior leasing history on the property. As such, the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined in accordance with ASC 805, and all acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred, other than those costs directly related to reviewing or assigning leases that we assumed upon acquisition, which were capitalized as part of leasing costs. Upon our early adoption of ASU 2017-01, effective October 1, 2016, most acquisitions, including those with a prior leasing history, are now generally treated as an asset acquisition under ASC 360. For acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions under ASC 360, all acquisition-related costs were capitalized and included as part of the fair value allocation of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, other than those costs that directly related to originating new leases we executed upon acquisition, which were capitalized as part of leasing costs.
In addition, total consideration for acquisitions may include a combination of cash and equity securities, such as OP Units. When OP Units are issued in connection with acquisitions, we determine the fair value of the OP Units issued based on the number of units issued multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of acquisition.
10

Table of Contents
2017 Acquisitions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we acquired 14 new farms in seven separate transactions, which are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes).

Property Name |  | Property Location |  | Acquisition Date |  | Total Acreage |  | No. of Farms |  | Primary Crop(s) |  | Lease Term(1) |  | Renewal Options |  | Total Purchase Price |  | Acquisition Costs(2) |  | Annualized Straight-line Rent(3) |  | New Long-term Debt
Citrus Boulevard |  | Martin, FL |  | 1/12/2017 |  | 3,748 |  | 1 |  | Organic Vegetables |  | 7.0 years |  | 3 (5 years) |  | $ | 54,000 |  |  | $ | 80 |  |  | $ | 2,926 |  |  | $ | 32,400 |
Spot Road(4) |  | Yuma, AZ |  | 6/1/2017 |  | 3,280 |  | 4 |  | Melons and Alfalfa Hay |  | 8.6 years |  | 1 (10 years) & 1 (2 years) |  | 27,500 |  |  | 88 |  |  | 1,673 |  |  | 15,300 |
Poplar Street |  | Bladen, NC |  | 6/2/2017 |  | 310 |  | 2 |  | Organic Blueberries |  | 9.6 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | 2,169 |  |  | 49 |  |  | 122 |  | (5) | 1,301 |
Phelps Avenue |  | Fresno, CA |  | 7/17/2017 |  | 847 |  | 4 |  | Pistachios and Almonds |  | 10.3 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | 13,603 |  |  | 43 |  |  | 681 |  | (5) | 8,162 |
Parrot Avenue(6) |  | Okeechobee, FL |  | 8/9/2017 |  | 1,910 |  | 1 |  | Misc. Vegetables |  | 0.5 years |  | None |  | 9,700 |  |  | 64 |  |  | 488 |  |  | 5,820 |
Cat Canyon Road(7) |  | Santa Barbara, CA |  | 8/30/2017 |  | 361 |  | 1 |  | Wine Grapes |  | 9.8 years |  | 2 (5 years) |  | 5,375 |  |  | 67 |  |  | 322 |  |  | 3,225 |
Oasis Road |  | Walla Walla, WA |  | 9/8/2017 |  | 746 |  | 1 |  | Apples, Cherries, and Wine Grapes |  | 6.3 years |  | None |  | 9,500 |  |  | 45 |  |  | 480 |  | (5) | 5,460 |
|  |  |  |  |  | 11,202 |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 121,847 |  |  | $ | 436 |  |  | $ | 6,692 |  |  | $ | 71,668 |

(1) | Where more than one lease was assumed or executed, represents the weighted-average lease term on the property.

(2) | Unless noted otherwise, acquisitions were accounted for as asset acquisitions under ASC 360.

(3) | Annualized straight-line amount is based on the minimum cash rental payments guaranteed under the lease, as required under GAAP.

(4) | Includes two farms (1,368 total acres) acquired through a leasehold interest, with the State of Arizona as the lessor. These state leases expire in February 2022 (485 total acres) and February 2025 (883 total acres). In addition, in connection with the acquisition of this property, we assumed four in-place leases with us as the lessor or sublessor. Three of these leases are agricultural leases, with one lease expiring on June 30, 2019, and two leases expiring on September 15, 2026. The fourth lease is a residential lease that expires on September 30, 2019. If either of the state leases is not renewed upon its expiration, the subleases on the respective acreage shall terminate automatically.

(5) | Leases also provide for a variable rent component based on the gross crop revenues earned on the property. The figures above represent only the minimum cash rents guaranteed under the respective leases.

(6) | In connection with the acquisition of this property, we executed a 6-year, follow-on lease with a new tenant that begins upon the expiration of the 7-month lease assumed at acquisition. The follow-on lease includes two, 6-year extension options and provides for minimum annualized straight-line rents of approximately $542,000. In addition, in connection with the execution of the follow-on lease, we committed to providing up to $1.0 million of capital for certain irrigation and property improvements. As stipulated in the follow-on lease, we will earn additional rent income on the total cost of the improvements as disbursements are made by us at a rate commensurate with the annual yield on the farmland (as determined by each year's minimum cash rent per the follow-on lease).

(7) | In connection with the acquisition of this property, we committed up to $4.0 million of capital to fund the development of additional vineyard acreage on the property. As stipulated in the lease agreement, we will earn additional rental income on the total cost of the project as the capital is disbursed by us at rates specified in the lease.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, in the aggregate, we recognized operating revenues of approximately $1.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and earnings of approximately $341,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.
11

Table of Contents
2016 Acquisitions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we acquired 13 new farms in seven separate transactions, which are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes).

Property Name |  | Property Location |  | Acquisition Date |  | Total Acreage |  | No. of Farms |  | Primary Crop(s) |  | Lease Term |  | Renewal Options |  | Total Purchase Price |  | Acquisition Costs |  | Annualized Straight-line Rent(1) |  | Net Long-term Debt Issued
Gunbarrel Road (2) |  | Saguache, CO |  | 3/3/2016 |  | 6,191 |  | 3 |  | Organic Potatoes |  | 5 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | $ | 25,736 |  |  | $ | 119 |  | (3) | $ | 1,591 |  |  | $ | 15,531 |
Calaveras Avenue |  | Fresno, CA |  | 4/5/2016 |  | 453 |  | 1 |  | Pistachios |  | 10 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | 15,470 |  |  | 39 |  | (4) | 774 |  | (5) | 9,282 |
Orange Avenue |  | St. Lucie, FL |  | 7/1/2016 |  | 401 |  | 1 |  | Vegetables |  | 7 years |  | 2 (7 years) |  | 5,100 |  |  | 38 |  | (4) | 291 |  |  | 3,120 |
Lithia Road |  | Hillsborough, FL |  | 8/11/2016 |  | 72 |  | 1 |  | Strawberries |  | 5 years |  | None |  | 1,700 |  |  | 38 |  | (3) | 97 |  |  | 1,020 |
Baca County(6) |  | Baca, CO |  | 9/1/2016 |  | 7,384 |  | 5 |  | Grass Hay and Alfalfa |  | 4 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | 6,323 |  |  | 73 |  | (4) | 384 |  |  | — |
Diego Ranch(7) |  | Stanislaus, CA |  | 9/14/2016 |  | 1,357 |  | 1 |  | Almonds |  | 3 years |  | 3 (5 years) & 1 (3 years) |  | 13,997 |  |  | 64 |  | (3) | 621 |  |  | — |
Nevada Ranch |  | Merced, CA |  | 9/14/2016 |  | 1,130 |  | 1 |  | Almonds |  | 3 years |  | 3 (5 years) & 1 (3 years) |  | 13,232 |  |  | 42 |  | (3) | 574 |  |  | — |
|  |  |  |  |  | 16,988 |  | 13 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 81,558 |  |  | $ | 413 |  |  | $ | 4,332 |  |  | $ | 28,953 |

(1) | Annualized straight-line amount is based on the minimum cash rental payments guaranteed under the lease, as required under GAAP.

(2) | As partial consideration for the acquisition of this property, we issued 745,879 OP Units, constituting an aggregate fair value of approximately $6.5 million as of the acquisition date. We incurred $25,500 of legal costs in connection with the issuance of these OP Units.

(3) | Acquisition accounted for as a business combination under ASC 805. In aggregate, $9,520 of these costs were direct leasing costs incurred in connection with these acquisitions.

(4) | Acquisition accounted for as an asset acquisition under ASC 360.

(5) | Leases provide for a variable rent component based on the gross crop revenues earned on the property. The figures above represent only the minimum cash rents guaranteed under the respective leases.

(6) | As partial consideration for the acquisition of this property, we issued 125,677 OP Units, constituting an aggregate fair value of approximately $1.5 million as of the acquisition date. We incurred approximately $8,235 of legal costs in connection with the issuance of these OP Units.

(7) | As partial consideration for the acquisition of this property, we issued 343,750 OP Units, constituting an aggregate fair value of approximately $3.9 million as of the acquisition date. We incurred approximately $21,710 of legal costs in connection with the issuance of these OP Units.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, in the aggregate, we recognized operating revenues of approximately $770,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, and losses of of approximately $42,000 and $196,000, respectively, related to the above acquisitions (which loss figures include approximately $128,000 and $229,000, respectively, of non-recurring acquisition-related costs).
Purchase Price Allocations
The allocation of the aggregate purchase price for the farms acquired during each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Acquisition Period |  | Land and Land Improvements |  | Buildings |  | Irrigation System |  | Other Improvements |  | Horticulture |  | Leasehold Interest – Land |  | In-place Leases |  | Leasing Costs |  | Net Below-Market Leases |  | Total Purchase Price
2017 Acquisitions |  | $ | 89,614 |  |  | $ | 2,804 |  |  | $ | 11,534 |  |  | $ | 824 |  |  | $ | 12,611 |  |  | $ | 3,488 |  |  | 487 |  |  | $ | 508 |  |  | $ | (23 | ) |  | $ | 121,847 |
2016 Acquisitions |  | 59,038 |  |  | 3,691 |  |  | 4,952 |  |  | 2,079 |  |  | 11,431 |  |  | — |  |  | 501 |  |  | 448 |  |  | (582 | ) |  | 81,558 |

12

Table of Contents
Acquired Intangibles and Liabilities
The following table shows the weighted-average amortization period, in years, for the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with new real estate acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

|  | Weighted-Average Amortization Period (in Years)
Intangible Assets and Liabilities |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Leasehold interest – land |  | 6.9 |  | —
In-place leases |  | 6.3 |  | 8.7
Leasing costs |  | 8.8 |  | 10.6
Above-market lease values |  | 2.1 |  | —
Below-market lease values and deferred revenue |  | 4.7 |  | 20.9
All intangible assets and liabilities | 7.0 |  | 14.0

Pro-Forma Financials
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we acquired six farms that qualified as business combinations. No farms were acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 that were treated as business combinations. The following table reflects pro-forma consolidated financial information as if each farm acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as part of a business combination was acquired on January 1, 2015. In addition, pro-forma earnings have been adjusted to assume that acquisition-related costs related to these farms were incurred at the beginning of the previous fiscal year (dollars in thousands, except share and per-share amounts).

|  | For the three months ended September 30, 2016 |  | For the nine months ended September 30, 2016
|  | (Unaudited) |  | (Unaudited)
Operating Data: |  |  |  |
Total operating revenue |  | $ | 4,718 |  |  | $ | 13,286 |
Net income attributable to the company |  | $ | 212 |  |  | $ | 594 |
Share and Per-share Data: |  |  |  |
Earnings per share of common stock – basic and diluted |  | $ | 0.02 |  |  | $ | 0.06 |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted |  | 10,018,331 |  |  | 10,001,466 |

The pro-forma consolidated results are prepared for informational purposes only. They are not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated financial condition or results of operations actually would have been assuming the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the previous fiscal year, nor do they purport to represent our consolidated financial position or results of operations for future periods.
Significant Existing Real Estate Activity
Lease Extensions and Renewals
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we executed ten separate leases on nine different farms in California and Florida that had leases expiring in either 2017 or 2018. In total, these leases were renewed for additional terms ranging between one and five years and for total annualized rents of approximately $2.2 million, representing a decrease of approximately $167,000 (approximately 7.0%) from that of the prior leases. These renewals were executed without incurring any downtime on the respective farms, and no leasing commissions or tenant improvements were incurred in connection with these renewals.
Project Completion
In connection with the lease we executed upon our acquisition of an 854-acre farm in California in September 2015, we agreed to fund the development of the property into an almond orchard. The development included the removal of 274 acres of old grape vineyards, the installation of a new irrigation system, including the drilling of four new wells, and the planting of over 800 acres of new almond trees. As of September 30, 2017, the development project had been completed at a total cost of approximately $8.4 million, and, as a result, we expect to receive approximately $5.2 million of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires January 9, 2031.
13

Table of Contents
Portfolio Diversification and Concentrations
Diversification
The following table summarizes the geographic locations, by state, of our properties with leases in place as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

|  | As of and For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |  | As of and For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
State |  | Number of Farms |  | Total Acres |  | % of Total Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Rental Revenue |  | Number of Farms |  | Total Acres |  | % of Total Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Rental Revenue
California |  | 27 |  | 7,921 |  | 12.8% |  | $ | 8,749 |  |  | 47.8% |  | 21 |  | 6,516 |  | 19.3% |  | $ | 6,986 |  |  | 56.4%
Florida |  | 17 |  | 11,225 |  | 18.2% |  | 4,839 |  |  | 26.5% |  | 15 |  | 5,567 |  | 16.5% |  | 2,408 |  |  | 19.4%
Colorado |  | 9 |  | 30,170 |  | 48.8% |  | 2,018 |  |  | 11.0% |  | 8 |  | 13,575 |  | 40.1% |  | 951 |  |  | 7.7%
Arizona |  | 6 |  | 6,280 |  | 10.2% |  | 1,114 |  |  | 6.1% |  | 2 |  | 3,000 |  | 8.9% |  | 544 |  |  | 4.4%
Oregon |  | 4 |  | 2,313 |  | 3.7% |  | 887 |  |  | 4.8% |  | 4 |  | 2,313 |  | 6.8% |  | 877 |  |  | 7.1%
Nebraska |  | 2 |  | 2,559 |  | 4.2% |  | 435 |  |  | 2.4% |  | 2 |  | 2,559 |  | 7.6% |  | 435 |  |  | 3.5%
Michigan |  | 4 |  | 270 |  | 0.4% |  | 187 |  |  | 1.0% |  | 4 |  | 270 |  | 0.8% |  | 187 |  |  | 1.5%
North Carolina |  | 2 |  | 310 |  | 0.5% |  | 42 |  |  | 0.2% |  | — |  | — |  | —% |  | — |  |  | —%
Washington |  | 1 |  | 746 |  | 1.2% |  | 31 |  |  | 0.2% |  | — |  | — |  | —% |  | — |  |  | —%
TOTALS |  | 72 |  | 61,794 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | 100.0% |  | 56 |  | 33,800 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 12,388 |  |  | 100.0%

Concentrations
Credit Risk
As of September 30, 2017, our farms were leased to 49 different, third-party tenants, with certain tenants leasing more than one farm. One unrelated tenant ("Tenant A") leases five of our farms, and aggregate rental revenue attributable to Tenant A accounted for approximately $3.2 million, or 17.7% of the rental revenue recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. In addition, Dole Food Company (“Dole”) leases two of our farms, and aggregate rental revenue attributable to Dole accounted for approximately $2.2 million, or 12.2% of the rental revenue recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. If either Tenant A or Dole fail to make rental payments or elect to terminate their respective leases, and the properties cannot be re-leased on satisfactory terms, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial performance and ability to continue operations. No other individual tenant represented greater than 10.0% of the total rental revenue recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Geographic Risk
As of September 30, 2017, 27 of the 72 farms we owned were located in California, 17 farms were located in Florida and 9 farms were located in Colorado. Further, our California, Florida, and Colorado farms accounted for approximately $8.7 million (47.8%), $4.8 million (26.5%), and $2.0 million (11.0%), respectively, of the rental revenue recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Our 27 California farms are spread across four of the many different growing regions within the state. Though we seek to continue to further diversify geographically, as may be desirable or feasible, should an unexpected natural disaster occur where our properties are located, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial performance and ability to continue operations. No other single state accounted for more than 10.0% of the total rental revenue recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
14

Table of Contents
NOTE 4. BORROWINGS
Our borrowings as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

|  | Carrying Value as of |  | As of September 30, 2017
|  | September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016 |  | Stated Interest Rates(1) (Range; Wtd Avg) |  | Maturity Dates (Range; Wtd Avg)
Mortgage notes and bonds payable: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fixed-rate mortgage notes payable |  | $ | 207,618 |  |  | $ | 142,861 |  |  | 2.90%–4.47%; 3.59% |  | 6/1/2020–11/1/2041; April 2029
Fixed-rate bonds payable |  | 84,518 |  |  | 49,348 |  |  | 2.38%–4.05%; 3.13% |  | 7/30/2018–8/30/2024; June 2021
Total mortgage notes and bonds payable |  | 292,136 |  |  | 192,209 |  |  |  |  |
Deferred financing costs – mortgage notes and bonds payable |  | (1,902 | ) |  | (1,412 | ) |  | N/A |  | N/A
Mortgage notes and bonds payable, net |  | $ | 290,234 |  |  | $ | 190,797 |  |  |  |  |
Variable-rate revolving lines of credit |  | $ | 5,100 |  |  | $ | 16,550 |  |  | 3.55% |  | 4/5/2024
Total borrowings, net |  | $ | 295,334 |  |  | $ | 207,347 |  |  |  |  |

(1) | Where applicable, stated interest rates are before interest patronage (as described below).

The weighted-average interest rate charged on the above borrowings, excluding the impact of deferred financing costs and before any interest patronage, or refunded interest, was 3.44% and 3.33% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and 3.29% and 3.27% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. In addition, 2016 interest patronage from our Farm Credit Notes Payable (as defined below), which we received and recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2017, resulted in a 17.2% reduction (approximately 61 basis points) to the stated interest rates on such borrowings.
MetLife Borrowings
MetLife Facility
On May 9, 2014, we closed on a credit facility (the "MetLife Facility") with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) that originally consisted of a $100.0 million long-term note payable (the “2015 MetLife Term Note”) and a $25.0 million revolving equity line of credit (the “2015 MetLife Line of Credit”). As amended on October 5, 2016, the overall size of the MetLife Facility was increased from $125.0 million to $200.0 million (the "2016 Amendment"). Pursuant to the 2016 Amendment, the MetLife Facility now consists of the 2015 MetLife Term Note, the 2015 MetLife Line of Credit, a $50.0 million long-term note payable (the "2016 MetLife Term Note" and, together with the 2015 MetLife Term Note, the "MetLife Term Notes"), the terms of which are pari passu with those of the 2015 MetLife Term Note, and a second $25.0 million revolving equity line of credit (the "2016 MetLife Line of Credit" and, together with the 2015 MetLife Line of Credit, the "MetLife Lines of Credit"), the terms of which are pari passu to those of the 2015 MetLife Line of Credit.
On September 19, 2017, we drew approximately $27.5 million on the MetLife Term Notes, which was used to repay a portion of the balance outstanding under the MetLife Lines of Credit. The interest rate on the new disbursement was 3.85% per annum (which rate is fixed through January 4, 2027) and was blended with the existing interest rate on the previously-outstanding balance under the MetLife Term Notes.
15

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the pertinent terms of the MetLife Facility as of September 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes):

Issuance |  | Aggregate Commitment |  | Maturity Dates |  | Principal Outstanding |  | Interest Rate Terms |  | Undrawn Commitment |
MetLife Term Notes |  | $ | 150,000 |  | (1) | 1/5/2029 |  | $ | 131,210 |  |  | 3.30%, fixed through 1/4/2027 | (2) | $ | 13,530 |  | (3),(4)
MetLife Lines of Credit |  | 50,000 |  |  | 4/5/2024 |  | 5,100 |  |  | 3-month LIBOR + 2.25% | (5) | 44,900 |  | (3)
Total principal outstanding |  |  |  | $ | 136,310 |  |  |  |  |  |

(1) | If the aggregate commitment under the MetLife Facility is not fully utilized by December 31, 2018, MetLife has the option to be relieved of its obligation to disburse the additional funds under the MetLife Term Notes.

(2) | Represents the blended interest rate on the MetLife Term Notes as of September 30, 2017. Interest rates for subsequent disbursements will be based on then-prevailing market rates. The interest rate on all then-outstanding disbursements will be subject to adjustment on January 5, 2027. Through December 31, 2018, the MetLife Term Notes are also subject to an unused fee of 0.20% on undrawn amounts.

(3) | Based on the properties that were pledged as collateral under the MetLife Facility, as of September 30, 2017, the maximum additional amount we could draw under the facility was approximately $12.9 million.

(4) | Net of amortizing principal payments of approximately $5.3 million.

(5) | The interest rate on the MetLife Lines of Credit is subject to a minimum annualized rate of 2.50%, plus an unused fee of 0.20% on undrawn amounts. The interest rate spread will be subject to adjustment on October 5, 2019. As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on the MetLife Lines of Credit was 3.55%.

Individual MetLife Notes
In May 2017, we also entered into two new loan agreements with MetLife (collectively, the "Individual MetLife Notes"), the terms of which are summarized in the aggregate in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Date of Issuance |  | Amount |  | Maturity Date |  | Principal Amortization |  | Interest Rate Terms
5/31/2017 |  | $15,300 | (1) | 2/14/2022 & 2/14/2025 |  | 28.6 years |  | 3.55% & 3.85%, fixed throughout their respective terms

(1) | Proceeds from these notes were used for the acquisition of a new property.

As of September 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants applicable to the MetLife Borrowings.
Farm Credit Notes Payable
From time to time since September 2014, we, through certain subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership, have entered into various loan agreements with certain Farm Credit associations, including Farm Credit of Central Florida, FLCA ("Farm Credit CFL"), Farm Credit West, FLCA ("Farm Credit West"), Cape Fear Farm Credit, ACA ("CF Farm Credit"), Farm Credit of Florida, ACA ("Farm Credit FL"), and Northwest Farm Credit Services, FLCA ("NW Farm Credit," and, collectively, with the other Farm Credit associations, "Farm Credit"). During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we entered into the following loan agreements with Farm Credit (dollars in thousands):

Issuer |  | Date of Issuance |  | Amount(1) |  | Maturity Date |  | Principal Amortization |  | Interest Rate Terms(2)
Farm Credit CFL(3) |  | 7/13/2017 |  | $ | 5,472 |  |  | 8/1/2022 |  | 28.4 years |  | 4.47%, fixed throughout term
Farm Credit West |  | 7/17/2017 |  | 8,162 |  |  | 5/1/2037 |  | 20.0 years |  | 4.31%, fixed through 7/31/2024, variable thereafter
CF Farm Credit |  | 6/14/2017 |  | 1,301 |  |  | 7/1/2022 |  | 40.2 years |  | 4.41%, fixed throughout its term
Farm Credit FL |  | 8/9/2017 |  | 5,820 |  |  | 3/1/2037 |  | 19.5 years |  | 4.70%, fixed through 2/29/2024, variable thereafter
NW Farm Credit |  | 9/8/2017 |  | 5,460 |  |  | 9/1/2024 |  | 39.6 years |  | 4.41%, fixed throughout its term

(1) | Proceeds from these notes were used to fund new acquisitions, to repay existing indebtedness, and for other general corporate purposes.

(2) | Stated rate is before interest patronage, as discussed below.

(3) | During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we amended four existing loan agreements with Farm Credit CFL to increase the loan amounts and adjust the principal amortization and interest rate terms as shown in the table above. The amount presented in the table above represents the total additional funds advanced under the four loans. The new terms of each of these four loans are pari passu with one another.

16

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes, in the aggregate, the pertinent terms of the loans outstanding from Farm Credit (collectively, the "Farm Credit Notes Payable") as of September 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes):

Issuer |  | # of Loans Outstanding |  | Dates of Issuance |  | Maturity Dates |  | Principal Outstanding |  | Stated Interest Rate(1) |
Farm Credit CFL |  | 8 |  | 9/19/2014 – 7/13/2017 |  | 6/1/2020 – 10/1/2040 |  | $ | 27,472 |  |  | 4.15% | (2)
Farm Credit West |  | 3 |  | 4/4/2016 – 7/17/2017 |  | 5/1/2037 – 11/1/2041 |  | 21,054 |  |  | 3.91% | (3)
CF Farm Credit |  | 1 |  | 6/14/2017 |  | 7/1/2022 |  | 1,301 |  |  | 4.41% | (4)
Farm Credit FL |  | 1 |  | 8/9/2017 |  | 3/1/2037 |  | 5,820 |  |  | 4.70% | (4)
NW Farm Credit |  | 1 |  | 9/8/2017 |  | 9/1/2024 |  | 5,460 |  |  | 4.41% | (4)
Total |  | 14 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 61,107 |  |  |  |

(1) | Represents the weighted-average, blended rate (before interest patronage, as discussed below) on the respective borrowings as of September 30, 2017.

(2) | In April 2017, we received interest patronage of approximately $124,000 related to interest accrued on loans from Farm Credit CFL during the year ended December 31, 2016, which resulted in a 15.8% reduction (approximately 55 basis points) to the stated interest rates on such borrowings. In March 2016, we received interest patronage related to loans from Farm Credit CFL of approximately $94,000.

(3) | In February 2017, we received interest patronage of approximately $59,000 related to interest accrued on loans from Farm Credit West during the year ended December 31, 2016, which resulted in a 21.3% reduction (approximately 76 basis points) to the stated interest rates on such borrowings. We did not receive any patronage related to loans from Farm Credit West during the prior year.

(4) | To date, no interest patronage has been received or recorded associated with these loans, as they were not outstanding during 2016.

Interest patronage, or refunded interest, on our borrowings from Farm Credit associations is recorded upon receipt and is included in Other income on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Receipt of interest patronage typically occurs in the first half of the calendar year following the year in which the respective interest payments are made.
As of September 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants applicable to the Farm Credit Notes Payable.
Farmer Mac Facility
On December 5, 2014, we, through certain subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership, entered into a bond purchase agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) with Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“Farmer Mac”) and Farmer Mac Mortgage Securities Corporation (the “Bond Purchaser”), for a secured note purchase facility that provides for bond issuances up to an aggregate principal amount of $75.0 million (the “Farmer Mac Facility”). On June 16, 2016, we amended the Farmer Mac Facility to increase the maximum borrowing capacity from $75.0 million to $125.0 million and extend the term of the Bond Purchase Agreement by two years, to December 11, 2018.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we issued five bonds for gross proceeds of approximately $35.6 million, the terms of which are summarized, in the aggregate, in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Date of Issuance |  | Gross Proceeds(1) |  | Maturity Dates |  | Principal Amortization |  | Interest Rate Terms
1/12/2017-8/30/2017 |  | $ | 35,625 |  | (1) | 1/10/2020 – 8/30/2024 |  | None |  | 2.80% – 4.05%, fixed throughout their respective terms

(1) | Proceeds from these bonds were used for the acquisitions of new properties.

The following table summarizes, in the aggregate, the terms of the 14 bonds outstanding under the Farmer Mac Facility as of September 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

Dates of Issuance |  | Initial Commitment |  | Maturity Dates |  | Principal Outstanding |  | Stated Interest Rate(1) |  | Undrawn Commitment |
12/11/2014–8/30/2017 |  | $ | 125,000 |  | (2) | 7/30/2018–8/30/2024 |  | $ | 84,519 |  |  | 3.13% |  | $ | 39,118 |  | (3)

(1) | Represents the weighted-average interest rate as of September 30, 2017.

(2) | If the balance of the Farmer Mac Facility is not fully utilized by December 11, 2018, Farmer Mac has the option to be relieved of its obligations to purchase additional bonds under the facility.

(3) | As of September 30, 2017, there was no additional availability to draw under the Farmer Mac Facility, as no additional properties had been pledged as collateral.

As of September 30, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Farmer Mac Facility.
17

Table of Contents
Debt Service – Aggregate Maturities
Scheduled principal payments of our aggregate mortgage notes and bonds payable as of September 30, 2017, for the succeeding years are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Period |  | Scheduled Principal Payments
For the remaining three months ending December 31: | 2017 |  | $ | 601 |
For the fiscal years ending December 31: | 2018 |  | 23,433 |
| 2019 |  | 11,060 |
| 2020 |  | 26,484 |
| 2021 |  | 7,242 |
| 2022 |  | 36,089 |
| Thereafter |  | 187,227 |
|  |  | $ | 292,136 |

Fair Value
ASC 820 provides a definition of fair value that focuses on the exchange (exit) price of an asset or liability in the principal, or most advantageous, market and prioritizes the use of market-based inputs to the valuation. ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

• | Level 1 — inputs that are based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

• | Level 2 — inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active or inactive markets or model-based valuation techniques, for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

• | Level 3 — inputs are generally unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. These unobservable inputs are generally supported by little or no market activity and are based upon management's estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

As of September 30, 2017, the aggregate fair value of our long-term, fixed-rate mortgage notes and bonds payable was approximately $286.3 million, as compared to an aggregate carrying value (excluding unamortized related debt issuance costs) of $292.1 million. The fair value of our long-term, fixed-rate mortgage notes and bonds payable is valued using Level 3 inputs under the hierarchy established by ASC 820-10 and is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using discount rates based on management’s estimates of market interest rates on long-term debt with comparable terms. Further, due to the revolving nature of the MetLife Lines of Credit and the lack of changes in market credit spreads, their aggregate fair value as of September 30, 2017, is deemed to approximate their aggregate carrying value of $5.1 million.
NOTE 5. MANDATORILY-REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
On August 17, 2016, we completed a public offering of 1,000,000 shares of 6.375% Series A Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Term Preferred Stock"), at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. Simultaneous with the closing of the offering and on the same terms and conditions, the underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase an additional 150,000 shares of the Term Preferred Stock to cover over-allotments. As a result of this offering, we issued a total of 1,150,000 shares of the Term Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of approximately $28.8 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $27.6 million. These proceeds were used to repay existing indebtedness, to fund new property acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes. The Term Preferred Stock is traded under the ticker symbol, "LANDP," on the NASDAQ Global Market. The Term Preferred Stock is not convertible into our common stock or any other securities.
Generally, we may not redeem shares of the Term Preferred Stock prior to September 30, 2018, except in limited circumstances to preserve our qualification as a REIT. On or after September 30, 2018, we may redeem the shares at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends up to, but excluding, the date of redemption. The shares of the Term Preferred Stock have a mandatory redemption date of September 30, 2021. We incurred approximately $1.2 million in total offering costs related to this issuance, which have been recorded net of the Term Preferred Stock as presented on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and we will amortize these costs over the mandatory redemption period, which ends on September 30, 2021.
18

Table of Contents
The Term Preferred Stock is recorded as a liability on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with ASC 480, "Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity," which states that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments should be classified as liabilities. In addition, the related dividend payments are treated similar to interest expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
As of September 30, 2017, the fair value of our Term Preferred Stock was approximately $29.8 million, as compared to the carrying value, exclusive of offering costs, of $28.8 million. The fair value of our Term Preferred Stock is valued using Level 1 inputs under the hierarchy established by ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," and is calculated based on the closing per-share price as of September 30, 2017, of $25.93.
The dividends to preferred stockholders declared by our Board of Directors and paid by us during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are reflected in the table below.

Fiscal Year |  | Declaration Date |  | Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Dividend per Preferred Share |
2017 |  | January 10, 2017 |  | January 20, 2017 |  | January 31, 2017 |  | $ | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | January 10, 2017 |  | February 16, 2017 |  | February 28, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | January 10, 2017 |  | March 22, 2017 |  | March 31, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | April 21, 2017 |  | April 28, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | May 19, 2017 |  | May 31, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | June 21, 2017 |  | June 30, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | July 21, 2017 |  | July 31, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | August 21, 2017 |  | August 31, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | September 20, 2017 |  | September 29, 2017 |  | 0.1328125 |  |
|  | Nine months ended September 30, 2017 |  | $ | 1.1953125 |  |
2016 |  | September 12, 2016 |  | September 21, 2016 |  | September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 0.190364583 |  | (1)
|  | Nine months ended September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 0.190364583 |  |

(1) | Represents the cumulative dividend from (but excluding) the date of original issuance through the month ended September 30, 2016.

NOTE 6. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator, which collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits and general expenses directly. Both our Adviser and Administrator are affiliates of ours, as their parent company is owned and controlled by David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. In addition, two of our executive officers, Mr. Gladstone and Terry Brubaker (our vice chairman and chief operating officer), serve as directors and executive officers of each of our Adviser and Administrator, and Michael LiCalsi, our general counsel and secretary, serves as our Administrator’s president.
The advisory agreement with our Adviser that was in effect through March 31, 2017 (the “Advisory Agreement”), and the current administration agreement with our Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”) each became effective February 1, 2013. A summary of each of these agreements is provided in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K.
On April 11, 2017, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement (the "Amended Advisory Agreement") with our Adviser that became effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017. Our entrance into the Amended Advisory Agreement was approved unanimously by our board of directors, including, specifically, our independent directors.
In addition, on April 11, 2017, we entered into an agreement with Gladstone Securities, LLC, ("Gladstone Securities"), effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, for it to act as our non-exclusive agent to assist us with arranging financing for our properties (the "Financing Arrangement Agreement"). Gladstone Securities is a privately-held broker-dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Gladstone Securities is an affiliate of ours, as its parent company is owned and controlled by David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities.
19

Table of Contents
A summary of the compensation terms for each of the Amended Advisory Agreement and the Financing Arrangement Agreement is below.
In addition, subsequent to September 30, 2017, the existing lease on one of our farms was assigned by the tenant to our TRS. See Note 10, "Subsequent Events," for further discussion on this transaction.
Amended Advisory Agreement
Pursuant to the Amended Advisory Agreement, effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, our Adviser is compensated in the form of a base management fee and, each as applicable, an incentive fee, a capital gains fee and a termination fee. Each of these fees is described below.
Base Management Fee
A base management fee will be paid quarterly and will be calculated as 2.0% per annum (0.50% per quarter) of the prior calendar quarter's total adjusted equity, which is defined as total equity plus total mezzanine equity, if any, each as reported on our balance sheet, adjusted to exclude unrealized gains and losses and certain other one-time events and non-cash items ("Total Adjusted Equity").
Incentive Fee
An incentive fee will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears if the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO for a particular quarter exceeds a hurdle rate of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) of the prior calendar quarter's Total Adjusted Equity. For purposes of this calculation, Pre-Incentive Fee FFO is defined in the Amended Advisory Agreement as FFO (also as defined in the Amended Advisory Agreement) accrued by the Company during the current calendar quarter (prior to any incentive fee calculation for the current calendar quarter), less any dividends paid on preferred stock securities that are not treated as a liability for GAAP purposes. Our Adviser will receive: (i) no Incentive Fee in any calendar quarter in which the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO does not exceed the hurdle rate; (ii) 100% of the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee FFO, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized); and (iii) 20% of the amount of the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO, if any, that exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized).
Capital Gains Fee
A capital gains-based incentive fee will be calculated and payable in arrears at the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Amended Advisory Agreement). The capital gains fee shall equal: (i) 15% of the cumulative aggregate realized capital gains minus the cumulative aggregate realized capital losses, minus (ii) any aggregate capital gains fees paid in prior periods. For purposes of this calculation, realized capital gains and losses will be calculated as (x) the sales price of the property minus (y) any costs to sell the property and the then-current gross value of the property (which includes the property's original acquisition price plus any subsequent, non-reimbursed capital improvements). At the end of each fiscal year, if this figure is negative, no capital gains fee shall be paid.
Termination Fee
In the event of our termination of the Amended Advisory Agreement for any reason (with 120 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), a termination fee would be payable to the Adviser equal to three times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by the Adviser during the 24-month period prior to such termination.
Financing Arrangement Agreement
In connection with the Financing Arrangement Agreement, Gladstone Securities may, from time to time, solicit the interest of various agricultural or commercial real estate lenders and/or recommend to us third-party lenders offering credit products or packages that are responsive to our needs. We will pay Gladstone Securities a financing fee in connection with the services it provides to us for securing financing on our properties. Depending on the size of the financing obtained, the maximum amount of the financing fee, which will be payable upon closing of the respective financing, will range from 0.5% to 1.0% of the amount of financing obtained. The amount of the financing fee may be reduced or eliminated as determined by us and Gladstone Securities after taking into consideration various factors, including, but not limited to, the involvement of any third-party brokers and general market conditions. During each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the total amount of financing fees paid to Gladstone Securities represented approximately 0.1% of the total financings secured since the Financing Arrangement Agreement has been in place.
20

Table of Contents
Related-Party Fees
The following table summarizes certain related-party fees paid or accrued for and reflected in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (dollars in thousands):

| For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Management fee(1)(2) | $ | 523 |  |  | $ | 385 |  |  | $ | 1,446 |  |  | $ | 1,158 |
Incentive fee(1)(2) | 261 |  |  | 22 |  |  | 688 |  |  | 181 |
Credits from voluntary, irrevocable waiver granted by Adviser’s board of directors(2)(3) | (54 | ) |  | — |  |  | (54 | ) |  | — |
Net fees due to our Adviser | $ | 730 |  |  | $ | 407 |  |  | $ | 2,080 |  |  | $ | 1,339 |
Administration fee(1)(2) | $ | 211 |  |  | $ | 184 |  |  | $ | 656 |  |  | $ | 575 |
Financing Fees to Gladstone Securities(4) | $ | 28 |  |  | $ | — |  |  | $ | 30 |  |  | $ | — |

(1) | Pursuant to the Advisory and Administration Agreements, respectively.

(2) | Reflected as a line item on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3) | The credit received from our Advisor for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, was granted as a voluntary, irrevocable waiver to be applied against the incentive fee payable to the Advisor.

(4) | Included in Mortgage notes and bonds payable, net on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized into Interest expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Related-Party Fees Due
Amounts due to related parties on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, were as follows (dollars in thousands):

|  | September 30, 2017 |  | December 31, 2016
Management fee due to Adviser |  | $ | 523 |  |  | $ | 384 |
Incentive fee due to Adviser |  | 261 |  |  | 169 |
Credits to fees due to Adviser(1) |  | (54 | ) |  | — |
Other due to Adviser(2) |  | 43 |  |  | 2 |
Total due to Adviser |  | 773 |  |  | 555 |
Administration fee due to Administrator |  | 211 |  |  | 202 |
Other due from Administrator(2) |  | — |  |  | (6 | )
Total due to Administrator |  | 211 |  |  | 196 |
Total due to related parties(3) |  | $ | 984 |  |  | $ | 751 |

(1) | The credit received from our Advisor for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, was granted as a voluntary, irrevocable waiver to be applied against the incentive fee payable to our Advisor.

(2) | Other fees due to or from related parties primarily relate to miscellaneous general and administrative expenses paid by our Adviser or Administrator on our behalf or by us on our Adviser's or Administrator's behalf.

(3) | Reflected as a line item on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE 7. EQUITY
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
On July 12, 2017, we filed an Articles of Amendment with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation for Maryland to increase the number of shares of capital stock that we have authority to issue from 20,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares, with the additional 80,000,000 shares of stock being initially classified as common stock, $0.001 par value per share.
21

Table of Contents
Stockholders’ Equity
As of September 30, 2017, there were 98,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, authorized, with 13,485,025 shares issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2016, there were 18,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, authorized, with 10,024,875 shares issued and outstanding.
Non-Controlling Interests in Operating Partnership
We consolidate our Operating Partnership, which is a majority-owned partnership. As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we owned approximately 91.7% and 87.4%, respectively, of the outstanding OP Units.
On or after 12 months after becoming a holder of OP Units, each limited partner, other than the Company, has the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of such units in exchange for cash or, at the Company’s option, shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. The cash redemption per OP Unit would be based on the market price of our common stock at the time of redemption. A limited partner will not be entitled to exercise redemption rights if the delivery of common stock to the redeeming limited partner would breach restrictions on the ownership of common stock imposed under our charter and other limitations thereof.
On September 20, 2017, 221,875 OP Units were tendered for redemption, and on September 29, 2017, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock in exchange for 50,000 OP Units, and we satisfied the redemption of 171,875 OP Units with a cash payment of approximately $2.3 million (approximately $13.21 per OP Unit).
Regardless of the rights described above, the Operating Partnership will not have an obligation to issue cash to a unitholder upon a redemption request if the Company elects to redeem the OP Units for shares of its common stock. When a non-Company unitholder redeems an OP Unit, non-controlling interest in the Operating Partnership is reduced, and stockholders’ equity is increased.
The Operating Partnership is required to make distributions on each OP Unit in the same amount as those paid on each share of the Company’s common stock, with the distributions on the OP Units held by the Company being utilized to make distributions to the Company’s common stockholders.
As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there were 1,227,383 and 1,449,258 OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners outstanding, respectively, of which 993,431 and zero OP Units, respectively, were eligible to be tendered for redemption. Subsequent to September 30, 2017, 121,875 additional OP Units were tendered for redemption; see Note 10, "Subsequent Events," for further discussion on the redemption of these OP Units.
22

Table of Contents
Distributions
The distributions to common stockholders declared by our Board of Directors and paid by us during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are reflected in the table below.

Fiscal Year |  | Declaration Date |  | Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Distributions per Common Share
2017 |  | January 10, 2017 |  | January 20, 2017 |  | January 31, 2017 |  | $ | 0.04300 |
|  | January 10, 2017 |  | February 16, 2017 |  | February 28, 2017 |  | 0.04300 |
|  | January 10, 2017 |  | March 22, 2017 |  | March 31, 2017 |  | 0.04300 |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | April 21, 2017 |  | April 28, 2017 |  | 0.04350 |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | May 19, 2017 |  | May 31, 2017 |  | 0.04350 |
|  | April 11, 2017 |  | June 21, 2017 |  | June 30, 2017 |  | 0.04350 |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | July 21, 2017 |  | July 31, 2017 |  | 0.04400 |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | August 21, 2017 |  | August 31, 2017 |  | 0.04400 |
|  | July 11, 2017 |  | September 20, 2017 |  | September 29, 2017 |  | 0.04400 |
|  |  |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |  | $ | 0.39150 |
2016 |  | January 12, 2016 |  | January 22, 2016 |  | February 2, 2016 |  | $ | 0.04000 |
|  | January 12, 2016 |  | February 18, 2016 |  | February 29, 2016 |  | 0.04000 |
|  | January 12, 2016 |  | March 21, 2016 |  | March 31, 2016 |  | 0.04000 |
|  | April 12, 2016 |  | April 22, 2016 |  | May 2, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  | April 12, 2016 |  | May 19, 2016 |  | May 31, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  | April 12, 2016 |  | June 17, 2016 |  | June 30, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  | July 12, 2016 |  | July 22, 2016 |  | August 2, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  | July 12, 2016 |  | August 22, 2016 |  | August 31, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  | July 12, 2016 |  | September 21, 2016 |  | September 30, 2016 |  | 0.04125 |
|  |  |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |  | $ | 0.36750 |

The same amounts were paid as distributions on each OP Unit held by non-controlling limited partners of the Operating Partnership as of the above record dates.
Registration Statement
On March 30, 2017, we filed a universal registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-217042) with the SEC (the "2017 Registration Statement") to replace our previous registration statement, which expired on April 1, 2017 (the "2014 Registration Statement"). The 2017 Registration Statement, which was declared effective by the SEC on April 12, 2017, permits us to issue up to an aggregate of $300.0 million in securities, consisting of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities, depository shares, subscription rights and units, including through separate, concurrent offerings of two or more of such securities. As of September 30, 2017, we have issued a total of 1,584,401 shares of common stock (excluding 50,000 shares of common stock issued in exchange for certain OP Units that were tendered for redemption) for gross proceeds of approximately $19.7 million under the 2017 Registration Statement.
In conjunction with the replacement of the 2014 Registration Statement, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, we wrote off approximately $46,000 of unallocated costs associated with the initial filing of the 2014 Registration Statement. These costs were written off to professional fees and stockholder-related expenses, both of which are included in General and administrative expenses on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
2017 Equity Issuances
On March 8, 2017, we completed a public offering of 1,680,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $11.35 per share. This issuance settled on March 13, 2017, and resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $19.1 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $18.0 million. On March 17, 2017, the underwriters exercised a portion of their over-allotment option in connection with this offering, and, as a result, we issued an additional 145,749 shares. This issuance settled on March 22, 2017, and resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $1.7 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $1.6 million. We used the proceeds received from this offering to repay existing indebtedness (which, in turn, was used to fund future farmland acquisitions) and for other general corporate purposes.
23

Table of Contents
On September 8, 2017, we completed a public offering of 1,150,000 shares (including 150,000 shares issued as a result of the underwriters simultaneously exercising their over-allotment option) of our common stock at a public offering price of $12.25 per share. This issuance settled on September 12, 2017, and resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $13.4 million. We used the proceeds received from this offering to repay existing indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.
At-the-Market Program
On August 7, 2015, we entered into equity distribution agreements (commonly referred to as "at-the-market agreements" or our "Sales Agreements") with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. (each a “Sales Agent”), under which we may issue and sell, from time to time and through the Sales Agents, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million (the “ATM Program”). During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we issued and sold 434,401 shares of our common stock at an average sales price of $12.92 per share under the ATM Program for gross proceeds of approximately $5.6 million and net proceeds of approximately $5.5 million. Through September 30, 2017, we have issued and sold a total of 498,962 shares of our common stock at an average sales price of $12.57 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $6.3 million and net proceeds of approximately $6.2 million. See Note 10, "Subsequent Events," for shares of common stock issued and sold under the ATM Program subsequent to September 30, 2017.
On April 13, 2017, we amended each of the Sales Agreements to reference the new 2017 Registration Statement. All other material terms of the Sales Agreements remained unchanged.
NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Obligations
In connection with a lease amendment we executed on one of our Oregon farms in May 2017, we committed to providing up to $1.8 million of capital for anticipated improvements on the farm, including irrigation upgrades and the planting of new blueberry bushes, which improvements are expected to be completed by December 31, 2020. As stipulated in the lease amendment, we will begin earning additional rent on the cost of the improvements as the funds are disbursed by us at an initial annual rate of 6.5%, which rate is subject to annual escalations and market resets. As a result of this project, and assuming full deployment of the capital commitment amount, we expect to receive approximately $718,000 of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires September 30, 2024. As of September 30, 2017, we have expended or accrued approximately $677,000 related to this project. In addition, as part of the project, certain blueberry bushes owned by us were removed to allow for the planting of new varieties of blueberry bushes. As a result, during the three months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a loss of approximately $78,000 associated with the removal of these bushes, which amount represents the net cost basis of such bushes plus all removal costs. This loss is recorded as Loss on disposal of real estate asset on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.
In connection with the lease we executed upon our acquisition of our two North Carolina farms in June 2017, we committed to providing up to $300,000 of capital over the first two years to support additional plantings and infrastructure on the farm, which improvements are expected to be completed by June 30, 2019. As stipulated in the lease, we will earn additional rent on the total cost of the improvements as disbursements are made by us at a rate commensurate with the annual yield on the farmland (as determined by each year's minimum cash rent per the lease). As a result of this project, and assuming full deployment of the capital commitment amount, we expect to receive approximately $157,000 of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires December 31, 2026. As of September 30, 2017, we have expended or accrued approximately $103,000 related to this project.
In connection with a lease amendment we executed on one of our Florida properties in June 2017, we committed to providing up to $700,000 of capital to expand and upgrade the existing cooler on the property, which improvements are expected to be completed during the three months ending December 31, 2017. As stipulated in the lease amendment, we will begin earning additional rent on the cost of the improvements as the funds are disbursed by us at an initial annual rate of 8.5%, which rate is subject to annual escalations. As a result of this project, and assuming full deployment of the capital commitment amount, we expect to receive approximately $280,000 of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires June 30, 2022. As of September 30, 2017, we have expended or accrued approximately $240,000 related to this project.
In connection with the follow-on lease we executed upon our acquisition of a 1,910-acre farm in Florida in August 2017 (which has a commencement date of February 24, 2018), we committed to providing up to $1.0 million of capital in the first year of the lease to support additional plantings and infrastructure on the farm, which improvements are expected to be completed during the three months ending March 31, 2019. As stipulated in the follow-on lease, we will earn additional rent on the total cost of the improvements as disbursements are made by us at a rate commensurate with the annual yield on the farmland (as determined by each year's minimum cash rent per the lease). As a result of this project, and assuming full deployment of the
24

Table of Contents
capital commitment amount, we expect to receive approximately $305,000 of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires February 23, 2024. We have no t expended or accrued any costs related to this project, as the follow-on lease has not yet gone into effect.
In connection with the lease we executed upon our acquisition of a 361-acre farm in California in August 2017, we committed to providing up to $4.0 million of capital over the first two years to fund the development of additional vineyard acreage on the farm, which development is expected to be completed completed by August 30, 2019. As stipulated in the lease, we will earn additional rent on the total cost of the improvements as the funds are disbursed by us at an initial annual rate of 6.0%, which is subject to annual escalations. As a result of this project, and assuming full deployment of the capital commitment amount, we expect to receive approximately $2.3 million of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires May 31, 2027. As of September 30, 2017, we have expended or accrued approximately $132,000 related to this project.
Litigation
We are not currently subject to any material known or threatened litigation.
NOTE 9. EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the respective periods. The non-controlling limited partners’ outstanding OP Units (which may be redeemed for shares of common stock) have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations, as there would be no effect on the amounts since the non-controlling limited partners’ share of income would also be added back to net income. Net income figures are presented net of non-controlling interests in the earnings per share calculations.

|  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
|  | (Dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Net (loss) income attributable to the Company |  | $ | (221 | ) |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 158 |  |  | $ | 374 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted |  | 12,271,925 |  |  | 10,018,331 |  |  | 11,512,968 |  |  | 10,001,466 |
(Loss) earnings per common share – basic and diluted |  | $ | (0.02 | ) |  | $ | 0.00 |  |  | $ | 0.01 |  |  | $ | 0.04 |

The weighted-average number of OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners was 1,444,435 and 1,447,633 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and 854,116 and 613,446 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.
NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Acquisition Activity
On October 2, 2017, we added onto one of our existing farms by acquiring an adjacent, 1,280-acre farm in Baca County, Colorado ("JJ Road"), for $900,000. At closing, we entered into a sale-leaseback agreement with the seller for a 4-year, triple-net lease that includes one, 5-year extension option and provides for minimum annualized, straight-line rents of approximately $52,000. We will account for this acquisition as an asset acquisition in accordance with ASC 360.
Financing Activity
On October 13, 2017, in connection with the acquisition of JJ Road, we closed on a term loan from Rabo AgriFinance, LLC, for $540,000. The loan is scheduled to mature on October 1, 2022, and will bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.59% per annum throughout its term.
Related-Party Activity
On October 17, 2017, our TRS entered into an Assignment and Assumption of Agricultural Lease (the "Assigned TRS Lease") with the previously-existing tenant on one of our farms located in Ventura County, California. The Assigned TRS Lease was then amended to shorten the lease term by two years (the new expiration date is July 31, 2018) and to remove any tenant renewal options. All other terms of the lease remained unchanged, including the rental amounts. In addition, in connection with the initial operations on the farm, on October 17, 2017, our TRS issued a $1.7 million unsecured promissory note to the
25

Table of Contents
Company that is scheduled to mature on July 31, 2018, and will bear interest at a rate equal to the prime rate plus a spread of 5.0% per annum.
As a result of this transaction, the amount of rent and interest our TRS pays to us (as the parent-landlord) will not be qualifying income for purposes of certain of our REIT tests; however, we do not expect such amounts to be at a level where we would be at risk of not qualifying as a REIT. In addition, any taxable income generated by our TRS (whose operations are consolidated within our financial statements) will be subject to regular corporate income taxes, which we will account for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, "Income Taxes." At this time, we are unable to estimate the amount of taxable income, if any, that will be generated by our TRS.
Equity Activity
Redemption of OP Units
On October 6, 2017, 121,875 OP Units were tendered for redemption, and, on October 13, 2017, we issued 121,875 shares of common stock in exchange for 121,875 OP Units.
ATM Program
Subsequent to September 30, 2017, through the date of this filing, we sold 31,038 shares of our common stock at an average sales price of $13.39 per share under the ATM Program for gross proceeds of approximately $416,000 and net proceeds of approximately $409,000.
Distributions
On October 10, 2017, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly cash distributions to common stockholders and holders of our Term Preferred Stock:

Record Date |  | Payment Date |  | Distribution per Common Share |  | Dividend per share of Term Preferred Stock
October 20, 2017 |  | October 31, 2017 |  | $ | 0.0441 |  |  | $ | 0.1328125 |
November 20, 2017 |  | November 30, 2017 |  | 0.0441 |  |  | 0.1328125 |
December 19, 2017 |  | December 29, 2017 |  | 0.0441 |  |  | 0.1328125 |
Total: |  |  |  | $ | 0.1323 |  |  | $ | 0.3984375 |

The same amounts paid to common stockholders will be paid as distributions on each OP Unit held by non-controlling limited partners of the Operating Partnership as of the above record dates.
26

Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements may relate to, among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “believe,” “will,” “provided,” “anticipate,” “future,” “could,” “growth,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “if,” “seek,” “possible,” “potential,” “likely” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects to be materially different from any future business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For further information about these and other factors that could affect our future results, please see the captions titled "Forward-Looking Statements" and “Risk Factors” in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”). We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”), except as required by law.
All references to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” in this Quarterly Report mean Gladstone Land Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term refers only to Gladstone Land Corporation.
OVERVIEW
General
We are an externally-managed, agricultural real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that is engaged primarily in the business of owning and leasing farmland. With the exception of one farm in Ventura County, California, which is currently leased (on a temporary basis) to a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, we are not a grower, nor do we farm the properties we own. We currently own 73 farms comprised of 63,074 acres across nine states in the U.S. (Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oregon, and Washington). We also own several farm-related facilities, such as cooling facilities, buildings utilized for the storage and assembly of boxes for shipping produce ("box barns"), packinghouses, processing facilities and various storage facilities.
We conduct substantially all of our investment activities through, and all of our properties are held, directly or indirectly, by, Gladstone Land Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). Gladstone Land Corporation controls the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and currently owns, directly or indirectly, approximately 92.5% of the units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”). In addition, we have elected for Land Advisers, a subsidiary of ours, to be taxed as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS").
Gladstone Management Corporation (our “Adviser”) manages our real estate portfolio pursuant to an advisory agreement, and Gladstone Administration, LLC (our “Administrator”), provides administrative services to us pursuant to an administration agreement. Our Adviser and our Administrator collectively employ all of our personnel and pay directly their salaries, benefits and general expenses.
Leases
General
Our farms are currently leased to 49 different, third-party tenants that are either independent or corporate farming operations, and, as of October 17, 2017, one farm is leased to our TRS. We primarily lease our farms on a triple-net basis, an arrangement under which the tenant is required to pay the related taxes, insurance costs (including drought insurance if we were to acquire properties that depend upon rainwater for irrigation), maintenance and other operating costs. Generally, our leases will have original terms ranging from 3 to 10 years for farms growing row crops and 5 to 15 years for farms growing permanent crops and will contain built-in rental rate increases. Currently, our 73 farms are leased under agricultural leases with original terms ranging from 1 to 15 years, with 47 farms leased on a pure triple-net basis, 24 farms leased on a partial-net basis (with the landlord responsible for all or a portion of the related property taxes), and 2 farms leased on a gross basis (with the landlord responsible for the related property taxes, insurance, and maintenance on the property). Additionally, 12 of our farms are leased under agreements that include a variable rent component based on the success of the farms' harvests each year.
27

Table of Contents
Lease Expirations
Farm leases are often short-term in nature, so in any given year, we may have multiple leases up for renewal or extension. The following table summarizes the lease expirations by year for the properties owned as of September 30, 2017, and with leases currently in place (dollars in thousands):

Year |  | Number of Expiring Leases |  | Expiring Leased Acreage |  | % of Total Acreage |  | Rental Revenue for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |  | % of Total Revenue
2017 |  | 1 | (1) | — |  | —% |  | $ | 24 |  |  | 0.1%
2018 |  | 5 |  | 4,839 |  | 7.8% |  | 665 |  |  | 3.6%
2019 |  | 4 |  | 157 |  | 0.3% |  | 113 |  |  | 0.6%
2020 |  | 13 |  | 28,666 |  | 46.4% |  | 6,178 |  |  | 33.8%
2021 |  | 5 |  | 6,954 |  | 11.3% |  | 1,455 |  |  | 8.0%
2022 |  | 3 |  | 269 |  | 0.4% |  | 451 |  |  | 2.5%
Thereafter |  | 25 |  | 20,909 |  | 33.8% |  | 9,416 |  |  | 51.4%
Totals |  | 56 |  | 61,794 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | 100.0%

(1) | Represents one oil and gas lease which continues on a year-to-year basis.

Recent Developments
Investment, Leasing and Other Portfolio Activity
Property Acquisitions
Since July 1, 2017, through the date of this filing, we have acquired eight farms, which are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except for footnotes):

Property Name |  | Property Location |  | Acquisition Date |  | Total Acreage |  | No. of Farms |  | Primary Crop(s) |  | Lease Term |  | Renewal Options |  | Total Purchase Price |  | Acquisition Costs(1) |  | Annualized Straight-line Rent(2) |
Phelps Avenue |  | Fresno, CA |  | 7/17/2017 |  | 847 |  | 4 |  | Pistachios and Almonds |  | 10.3 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | $ | 13,603 |  |  | $ | 43 |  |  | $ | 681 |  | (3)
Parrot Avenue(4) |  | Okeechobee, FL |  | 8/9/2017 |  | 1,910 |  | 1 |  | Misc. Vegetables |  | 0.5 years |  | None |  | 9,700 |  |  | 64 |  |  | 488 |  |
Cat Canyon Road(5) |  | Santa Barbara, CA |  | 8/30/2017 |  | 361 |  | 1 |  | Wine Grapes |  | 9.8 years |  | 2 (5 years) |  | 5,375 |  |  | 67 |  |  | 322 |  |
Oasis Road |  | Walla Walla, WA |  | 9/8/2017 |  | 746 |  | 1 |  | Apples, Cherries, and Wine Grapes |  | 6.3 years |  | None |  | 9,500 |  |  | 45 |  |  | 480 |  | (3)
JJ Road |  | Baca, CO |  | 10/2/2017 |  | 1,280 |  | 1 |  | Grass Hay and Alfalfa |  | 4.3 years |  | 1 (5 years) |  | 900 |  |  | 26 |  |  | 52 |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | 5,144 |  | 8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 39,078 |  |  | $ | 245 |  |  | $ | 2,023 |  |

(1) | Acquisition accounted for as an asset acquisition under ASC 360. As such, all acquisition-related costs were capitalized and allocated among the identifiable assets acquired. The figures above represent only the costs paid or accrued for as of the date of this filing.

(2) | Annualized straight-line amount is based on the minimum cash rental payments guaranteed under the lease, as required under GAAP.

(3) | Leases also provide for a variable rent component based on the gross crop revenues earned on the property. The figures above represent only the minimum cash rents guaranteed under the lease.

(4) | In connection with the acquisition of this property, we executed a 6-year, follow-on lease with a new tenant that begins upon the expiration of the 7-month lease assumed at acquisition. The follow-on lease includes two, 6-year extension options and provides for minimum annualized straight-line rents of approximately $542,000. In addition, in connection with the execution of the follow-on lease, we committed to providing up to $1.0 million of capital for certain irrigation and property improvements. As stipulated in the follow-on lease, we will earn additional rent income on the total cost of the improvements as disbursements are made by us at a rate commensurate with the annual yield on the farmland (as determined by each year's minimum cash rent per the follow-on lease).

(5) | In connection with the acquisition of this property, we committed up to $4.0 million of capital to fund the development of additional vineyard acreage on the property. As stipulated in the lease agreement, we will earn additional rental income on the total cost of the project as the capital is disbursed by us at rates specified in the lease.

28

Table of Contents
Existing Properties
Lease Renewals
During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we renewed the final two agricultural leases that were originally scheduled to expire in 2017. Each of these leases (which were on two of our farms in California) were renewed for an additional three years for total annualized rents of approximately $1.1 million, representing a decrease of approximately 12.5% (or approximately $163,000) from that of the prior leases. These renewals were executed without incurring any downtime on the respective farms, and no leasing commissions or tenant improvements were incurred in connection with these renewals.
Project Completion
In connection with the lease we executed upon our acquisition of an 854-acre farm in California in September 2015, we agreed to fund the development of the property into an almond orchard. The development included the removal of 274 acres of old grape vineyards, the installation of a new irrigation system, including the drilling of four new wells, and the planting of over 800 acres of new almond trees. We completed the project during the three months ended September 30, 2017, at a total cost of approximately $8.4 million, and, as a result, we expect to receive approximately $5.2 million of additional rent throughout the term of the lease, which expires January 9, 2031.
TRS Lease Assumption
On October 17, 2017, our TRS entered into an Assignment and Assumption of Agricultural Lease (the "Assigned TRS Lease") with the previously-existing tenant on one of our farms located in Ventura County, California. The Assigned TRS Lease was then amended to shorten the lease term by two years (the new expiration date is July 31, 2018) and to remove any tenant renewal options. All other terms of the lease remained unchanged, including the rental amounts. In addition, in connection with the initial operations on the farm, on October 17, 2017, our TRS issued a $1.7 million unsecured promissory note to the Company that is scheduled to mature on July 31, 2018, and will bear interest at a rate equal to the prime rate plus a spread of 5.0% per annum.
As a result of this transaction, the amount of rent and interest our TRS pays to us (as the parent-landlord) will not be qualifying income for purposes of certain of our REIT tests; however, we do not expect such amounts to be at a level where we are at risk of not qualifying as a REIT. In addition, any taxable income generated by our TRS (whose operations are consolidated within our financial statements) will be subject to regular corporate income taxes, which we will account for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, "Income Taxes." We are unable to estimate the amount of taxable income, if any, that will be generated by our TRS.
Financing Activity
Debt Activity
Since July 1, 2017, through the date of this filing, we have entered into the following loan agreements (dollars in thousands):

Lender(1) |  | Dates of Issuance |  | Principal Amount |  | Maturity Date |  | Principal Amortization |  | Stated Interest Rate Terms(2)
Farm Credit CFL(3),(4) |  | 7/13/2017 |  | $ | 5,472 |  |  | 8/1/2022 |  | 28.4 years |  | 4.47%, fixed throughout term
Farm Credit West(5) |  | 7/17/2017 |  | 8,162 |  |  | 5/1/2037 |  | 20.0 years |  | 4.31%, fixed through 7/31/2024 (variable thereafter)
Farm Credit FL |  | 8/9/2017 |  | 5,820 |  |  | 3/1/2037 |  | 19.5 years |  | 4.70%, fixed through 2/29/2024 (variable thereafter)
Farmer Mac |  | 8/30/2017 |  | 3,225 |  |  | 8/30/2024 |  | None |  | 4.05%, fixed throughout term
NW Farm Credit |  | 9/8/2017 |  | 5,460 |  |  | 9/1/2024 |  | 39.6 years |  | 4.41%, fixed throughout term
MetLife(6) |  | 9/19/2017 |  | 27,450 |  |  | 1/5/2029 |  | 28.6 years |  | 3.85%, fixed through 1/4/2027
Rabo AgriFinance |  | 10/13/2017 |  | 540 |  |  | 10/1/2022 |  | 25.0 years |  | 4.59%, fixed throughout term
|  |  |  | $ | 56,129 |  |  |  |  |  |  |

(1) | For further discussion on borrowings from each of these lenders, refer to Note 4, "Borrowings," in the notes to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

(2) | Where applicable, rate is before interest patronage, or refunded interest.

(3) | In April 2017, we received interest patronage from Farm Credit CFL representing a 15.8% refund of the interest accrued on all borrowings from Farm Credit CFL during the year ended December 31, 2016. This interest patronage reduced the interest rates on our borrowings from Farm Credit CFL during the year ended December 31, 2016, from a weighted-average stated interest rate of 3.47% to a weighted-average effective interest rate of 2.93%. We are unable to estimate the amount of interest patronage to be received, if any, related to interest accrued during 2017 on our Farm Credit CFL borrowings.

(4) | During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we amended four existing loan agreements with Farm Credit CFL to increase the loan amounts and adjust the principal amortization and interest rate terms as shown in the table above. The amount presented in the table above represents the total additional funds advanced under the four loans. The new terms of each of these four loans are pari passu with one another.

29

Table of Contents

(5) | In February 2017, we received interest patronage from Farm Credit West representing a 21.3% refund of the interest accrued on all borrowings from Farm Credit West during the year ended December 31, 2016. This interest patronage reduced the interest rates on our borrowings from Farm Credit West during the year ended December 31, 2016, from a weighted-average stated interest rate of 3.59% to a weighted-average effective interest rate of 2.83%. We are unable to estimate the amount of interest patronage to be received, if any, related to interest accrued during 2017 on our Farm Credit West borrowings.

(6) | This balance was drawn on the MetLife Term Notes, with the proceeds from the disbursement being used to repay a portion of the balance outstanding under the MetLife Lines of Credit (refer to Note 4, "Borrowings," in the notes to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for definitions of each of these terms). The interest rate on the new disbursement under the MetLife Term Notes was blended with the interest rate in place for the previously-existing balance drawn, which resulted in a new, overall blended interest rate on the MetLife Term Notes of 3.30% per annum, which rate is fixed through January 4, 2027.

Proceeds from the above borrowings were used to fund new farm acquisitions, repay existing indebtedness, and for other general corporate purposes.
Equity Activity
September 2017 Offering
In September 2017, we completed an overnight offering of our common stock at public offering price of $12.25 per share (the “September 2017 Offering”). Including the underwriters' simultaneous exercise of their over-allotment option, we issued a total of 1,150,000 shares in connection with the September 2017 Offering, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $13.4 million. We used the proceeds received from this offering to repay existing indebtedness (which, in turn, was used to fund future farmland acquisitions) and for other general corporate purposes.
At-the-Market Program
On August 7, 2015, we entered into equity distribution agreements ("Sales Agreements") with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. (each a “Sales Agent”), under which we may issue and sell, from time to time and through the Sales Agents, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $30.0 million (the “ATM Program”). On April 13, 2017, we amended the Sales Agreements to reference the new universal registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-217042) (the "2017 Registration Statement"), filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017, and declared effective on April 12, 2017. All other material terms of the Sales Agreements remained the same.
Since July 1, 2017, through the date of this filing, we sold 465,439 shares of our common stock under the ATM Program at an average sales price of $12.95 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $6.0 million and net proceeds of approximately $5.9 million. To date, we have sold 530,000 shares of our common stock at an average sales price of $12.62 per share under the ATM Program for gross proceeds of approximately $6.7 million and net proceeds of approximately $6.6 million.
OP Unit Redemptions
Since July 1, 2017, through the date of this filing, a total of 343,750 OP Units were tendered for redemption. As a result, the Company issued 171,875 shares of common stock (in exchange for 171,875 of the tendered OP Units), and we satisfied the redemption of the remaining 171,875 of the tendered OP Units with a cash payment of approximately $2.3 million (approximately $13.21 per OP Unit). Currently, there are 1,105,508 OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners outstanding, of which 871,556 are eligible to be tendered for redemption.
30

Table of Contents
Portfolio Diversity
Since our initial public offering in January 2013 (the “IPO”), we have expanded our portfolio from 12 farms leased to 7 different, unrelated tenants to a current portfolio of 73 farms leased to 49 different, unrelated tenants (plus one related-party tenant). While our focus remains in farmland suitable for growing fresh produce annual row crops, we have also begun to diversify our portfolio into farmland suitable for other crop types, including permanent crops, consisting primarily of almonds, pistachios and blueberries, and certain commodity crops, consisting primarily of corn and beans. The following table summarizes the different sources of revenues for our properties with leases in place as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

|  | As of and For the |  | As of and For the |  | Annualized GAAP Rental Revenue as of
|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |  | September 30, 2017(1)
Revenue Source |  | Total Farmable Acres |  | % of Total Farmable Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Revenue |  | Total Farmable Acres |  | % of Total Farmable Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Revenue |  | Total Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Revenue
Annual row crops – fresh produce(2) |  | 14,935 |  | 30.1% |  | $ | 10,926 |  |  | 59.7% |  | 9,768 |  | 34.9% |  | $ | 8,303 |  |  | 67.0% |  | $ | 14,988 |  |  | 55.3%
Annual row crops – commodity crops(3) |  | 28,851 |  | 58.1% |  | 2,645 |  |  | 14.4% |  | 14,132 |  | 50.6% |  | 1,206 |  |  | 9.8% |  | 4,436 |  |  | 16.3%
Subtotal – Total annual row crops |  | 43,786 |  | 88.2% |  | 13,571 |  |  | 74.1% |  | 23,900 |  | 85.5% |  | 9,509 |  |  | 76.8% |  | 19,424 |  |  | 71.6%
Permanent crops(4) |  | 5,881 |  | 11.8% |  | 3,272 |  |  | 17.9% |  | 4,058 |  | 14.5% |  | 1,587 |  |  | 12.8% |  | 5,683 |  |  | 21.0%
Subtotal – Total crops |  | 49,667 |  | 100.0% |  | 16,843 |  |  | 92.0% |  | 27,958 |  | 100.0% |  | 11,096 |  |  | 89.6% |  | 25,107 |  |  | 92.6%
Facilities and other(5) |  | — |  | — |  | 1,459 |  |  | 8.0% |  | — |  | — |  | 1,292 |  |  | 10.4% |  | 2,005 |  |  | 7.4%
Total |  | 49,667 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | 100.0% |  | 27,958 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 12,388 |  |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 27,112 |  |  | 100.0%

(1) | Annualized GAAP rental revenue is based on the minimum rental payments required per the leases in place as of September 30, 2017, and includes the amortization of any above-market lease values or accretion of any below-market lease values, deferred revenue and tenant improvements.

(2) | Includes berries and other fruits, such as blackberries, melons, raspberries, and strawberries; and vegetables, such as arugula, broccoli, cabbage, carrots, celery, cilantro, cucumbers, edamame, green beans, kale, lettuce, mint, onions, peas, peppers, potatoes, radicchio, spinach, and tomatoes.

(3) | Includes alfalfa, barley, corn, edible beans, grass, popcorn, soybeans, and wheat.

(4) | Includes almonds, apples, avocados, blueberries, cherries, lemons, pistachios, and wine grapes.

(5) | Consists primarily of rental revenue from: (i) farm-related facilities, such as coolers, packinghouses, distribution centers, residential houses for tenant farmers and other farm-related buildings; (ii) two oil and gas surface area leases on small parcels of two of our properties; and (iii) unimproved or non-farmable acreage on certain of our farms.

Our acquisition of 61 farms since our IPO has also allowed us to further diversify our portfolio geographically. The following table summarizes the different geographic locations of our properties with leases in place as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

|  | As of and For the |  | As of and For the |  | Annualized GAAP Rental Revenue as of
|  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |  | September 30, 2017(1)
State |  | Total Acres |  | % of Total Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Rental Revenue |  | Total Acres |  | % of Total Acres |  | Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Rental Revenue |  | Total Rental Revenue |  | % of Total Rental Revenue
California(2) |  | 7,921 |  | 12.8% |  | $ | 8,749 |  |  | 47.8% |  | 6,516 |  | 19.3% |  | $ | 6,986 |  |  | 56.4% |  | $ | 12,356 |  |  | 45.6%
Florida |  | 11,225 |  | 18.2% |  | 4,839 |  |  | 26.5% |  | 5,567 |  | 16.5% |  | 2,408 |  |  | 19.4% |  | 7,000 |  |  | 25.8%
Colorado |  | 30,170 |  | 48.8% |  | 2,018 |  |  | 11.0% |  | 13,575 |  | 40.1% |  | 951 |  |  | 7.7% |  | 2,691 |  |  | 9.9%
Arizona |  | 6,280 |  | 10.2% |  | 1,114 |  |  | 6.1% |  | 3,000 |  | 8.9% |  | 544 |  |  | 4.4% |  | 2,414 |  |  | 8.9%
Oregon |  | 2,313 |  | 3.7% |  | 887 |  |  | 4.8% |  | 2,313 |  | 6.8% |  | 877 |  |  | 7.1% |  | 1,202 |  |  | 4.4%
Nebraska |  | 2,559 |  | 4.2% |  | 435 |  |  | 2.4% |  | 2,559 |  | 7.6% |  | 435 |  |  | 3.5% |  | 580 |  |  | 2.2%
Michigan |  | 270 |  | 0.4% |  | 187 |  |  | 1.0% |  | 270 |  | 0.8% |  | 187 |  |  | 1.5% |  | 250 |  |  | 0.9%
North Carolina |  | 310 |  | 0.5% |  | 42 |  |  | 0.2% |  | — |  | —% |  | — |  |  | —% |  | 127 |  |  | 0.5%
Washington |  | 746 |  | 1.2% |  | 31 |  |  | 0.2% |  | — |  | —% |  | — |  |  | —% |  | 492 |  |  | 1.8%
|  | 61,794 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | 100.0% |  | 33,800 |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 12,388 |  |  | 100.0% |  | $ | 27,112 |  |  | 100.0%

(1) | Annualized GAAP rental revenue is based on the minimum rental payments required per the leases in place as of September 30, 2017, and includes the amortization of any above-market lease values and lease incentives or accretion of any below-market lease values, deferred revenue, and tenant improvements.

(2) | According to the California Chapter of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, there are eight distinct growing regions within California; our farms are spread across four of these growing regions.

31

Table of Contents
Our Adviser and Administrator
We are externally managed pursuant to a contractual investment advisory arrangement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with our Adviser, under which our Adviser directly employs certain of our personnel and pays their payroll, benefits and general expenses directly, and our Administrator provides administrative services to us pursuant to a separate administration agreement with our Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”). Both our Adviser and Administrator are affiliates of ours, as their parent company is owned and controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. In addition, two of our executive officers, Mr. Gladstone and Mr. Terry Brubaker (our vice chairman and chief operating officer), serve as directors and executive officers of each of our Adviser and Administrator. Mr. Michael LiCalsi, our general counsel and secretary, also serves as our Administrator’s president. On April 11, 2017, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement (the "Amended Advisory Agreement") with our Adviser that became effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017. Our entrance into the Amended Advisory Agreement was approved unanimously by our board of directors, including, specifically, our independent directors.
A summary of each of the Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement is provided in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2016 Form 10-K. A summary of the compensation terms for the Amended Advisory Agreement is below.
Amended Advisory Agreement
Pursuant to the Amended Advisory Agreement, effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, our Adviser is compensated as follows:

• | A base management fee is paid quarterly and will be calculated as 2.0% per annum (0.50% per quarter) of the prior calendar quarter's total adjusted equity, which is defined as total equity plus total mezzanine equity, if any, each as reported on our balance sheet, adjusted to exclude unrealized gains and losses and certain other one-time events and non-cash items ("Total Adjusted Equity").

• | An incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears if the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO (as defined below) for a particular quarter exceeds a hurdle rate of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) of the prior calendar quarter's Total Adjusted Equity. For purposes of this calculation, Pre-Incentive Fee FFO is defined in the Amended Advisory Agreement as FFO (as defined in the Amended Advisory Agreement) accrued by the Company during the current calendar quarter (prior to any incentive fee calculation for the current calendar quarter), less any dividends paid on preferred stock securities that are not treated as a liability for GAAP purposes. Our Adviser will receive: (i) no Incentive Fee in any calendar quarter in which the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO does not exceed the hurdle rate; (ii) 100% of the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO with respect to that portion of such Pre-Incentive Fee FFO, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized); and (iii) 20% of the amount of the Pre-Incentive Fee FFO, if any, that exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized).

• | A capital gains-based incentive fee is calculated and payable in arrears at the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Amended Advisory Agreement). The capital gains fee shall equal (i) 15% of the cumulative aggregate realized capital gains minus the cumulative aggregate realized capital losses, minus (ii) any aggregate capital gains fees paid in prior periods. For purposes of this calculation, realized capital gains and losses will be calculated as (x) the sales price of the property minus (y) any costs to sell the property and the then-current gross value of the property (which includes the property's original acquisition price plus any subsequent, non-reimbursed capital improvements). At the end of each fiscal year, if this figure is negative, no capital gains fee shall be paid.

• | In the event of our termination of the Amended Advisory Agreement (or in the event of non-renewal by us) for any reason (with 120 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), a termination fee would be payable to the Adviser equal to three times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by the Adviser during the 24-month period prior to such termination.

We expect this amendment to result in an increase to our base management fee in future periods, as the previous base management fee calculation did not include non-controlling interests in our Operating Partnership. In addition, if, in the future, we choose to issue either securities that are classified as mezzanine equity or preferred stock that is required to be treated as permanent equity under GAAP, these amounts will increase the base on which our base management fee is calculated, whereas they were excluded in the from the calculation of our base management fee before the Amended Advisory Agreement went into effect. However, we expect our overall incentive fee (including the capital gains-based incentive fee) to be lower in future periods due to: (i) a higher base management fee (which will result in a lower Pre-Incentive Fee FFO) and (ii) a lower fee on any capital gains we may realize, as the previous incentive fee calculation essentially included a 20% fee on realized capital gains.
32

Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make judgments that are subjective in nature to make certain estimates and assumptions. Application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment regarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, and, as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in our 2016 Form 10-K. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the purposes of the following discussions on certain operating revenues and expenses:

• | With regard to the comparison between the three months ended September 30, 2017 versus 2016:

◦ | Same-property basis represents properties that were owned as of June 30, 2016, and were not vacant at any point during either period presented;

◦ | Properties acquired during the prior-year period are properties acquired during the three months ended September 30, 2016;

◦ | Properties acquired subsequent to prior-year period are properties acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016; and

◦ | Properties with vacancy represent properties that were vacant at any point during either period presented (we had one property that was vacant for a portion of the three months ended September 30, 2016).

• | With regard to the comparison between the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus 2016:

◦ | Same-property basis represents properties that were owned as of December 31, 2015, and were not vacant at any point during either period presented;

◦ | Properties acquired during the prior-year period are properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2016;

◦ | Properties acquired subsequent to prior-year period are properties acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016; and

◦ | Properties with vacancy represent properties that were vacant at any point during either period presented (we had one property that was vacant for a portion of the nine months ended September 30, 2016).

33

Table of Contents
A comparison of our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is below (dollars in thousands):

|  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  |  |  |
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Operating revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental revenues |  | $ | 6,561 |  |  | $ | 4,467 |  |  | $ | 2,094 |  |  | 46.9%
Tenant recovery revenue |  | 3 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 50.0%
Total operating revenues |  | 6,564 |  |  | 4,469 |  |  | 2,095 |  |  | 46.9%
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 2,051 |  |  | 1,432 |  |  | 619 |  |  | 43.2%
Property operating expenses |  | 257 |  |  | 161 |  |  | 96 |  |  | 59.6%
Acquisition-related expenses |  | 22 |  |  | 123 |  |  | (101 | ) |  | (82.1)%
Management and incentive fees, net of fee credits |  | 730 |  |  | 407 |  |  | 323 |  |  | 79.4%
Administration fee |  | 211 |  |  | 184 |  |  | 27 |  |  | 14.7%
General and administrative |  | 374 |  |  | 356 |  |  | 18 |  |  | 5.1%
Total operating expenses |  | 3,645 |  |  | 2,663 |  |  | 982 |  |  | 36.9%
Operating income |  | 2,919 |  |  | 1,806 |  |  | 1,113 |  |  | 61.6%
Other income (expense) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other income |  | 4 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 2 |  |  | 100.0%
Interest expense |  | (2,634 | ) |  | (1,554 | ) |  | (1,080 | ) |  | 69.5%
Distributions on Term Preferred Stock |  | (458 | ) |  | (219 | ) |  | (239 | ) |  | 109.1%
Loss on disposal of real estate asset |  | (78 | ) |  | — |  |  | (78 | ) |  | NM
Total other expense |  | (3,166 | ) |  | (1,771 | ) |  | (1,395 | ) |  | 78.8%
Net (loss) income |  | (247 | ) |  | 35 |  |  | (282 | ) |  | (805.7)%
Plus (less) net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests |  | 26 |  |  | (3 | ) |  | 29 |  |  | (966.7)%
Net (loss) income attributable to the Company |  | $ | (221 | ) |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | (253 | ) |  | (790.6)%

NM = Not Meaningful
34

Table of Contents

|  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |  |  |  |
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Operating revenues: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Rental revenues |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | $ | 12,388 |  |  | $ | 5,914 |  |  | 47.7%
Tenant recovery revenue |  | 8 |  |  | 8 |  |  | — |  |  | —%
Total operating revenues |  | 18,310 |  |  | 12,396 |  |  | 5,914 |  |  | 47.7%
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  | 5,123 |  |  | 3,744 |  |  | 1,379 |  |  | 36.8%
Property operating expenses |  | 747 |  |  | 545 |  |  | 202 |  |  | 37.1%
Acquisition-related expenses |  | 68 |  |  | 243 |  |  | (175 | ) |  | (72.0)%
Management and incentive fees, net of fee credits |  | 2,080 |  |  | 1,339 |  |  | 741 |  |  | 55.3%
Administration fee |  | 656 |  |  | 575 |  |  | 81 |  |  | 14.1%
General and administrative |  | 1,208 |  |  | 1,150 |  |  | 58 |  |  | 5.0%
Total operating expenses |  | 9,882 |  |  | 7,596 |  |  | 2,286 |  |  | 30.1%
Operating income |  | 8,428 |  |  | 4,800 |  |  | 3,628 |  |  | 75.6%
Other income (expense) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Other income |  | 190 |  |  | 106 |  |  | 84 |  |  | 79.2%
Interest expense |  | (6,984 | ) |  | (4,297 | ) |  | (2,687 | ) |  | 62.5%
Distributions on Term Preferred Stock |  | (1,375 | ) |  | (219 | ) |  | (1,156 | ) |  | 527.9%
Loss on disposal of real estate asset |  | (78 | ) |  | — |  |  | (78 | ) |  | NM
Total other expense |  | (8,247 | ) |  | (4,410 | ) |  | (3,837 | ) |  | 87.0%
Net income |  | 181 |  |  | 390 |  |  | (209 | ) |  | (53.6)%
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests |  | (23 | ) |  | (16 | ) |  | (7 | ) |  | 43.8%
Net income attributable to the Company |  | $ | 158 |  |  | $ | 374 |  |  | $ | (216 | ) |  | (57.8)%

NM = Not Meaningful
Operating Revenues
Same-property Analysis (dollars in thousands)

Rental Revenues: | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Same-property basis | $ | 4,337 |  |  | $ | 4,278 |  |  | $ | 59 |  |  | 1.4% |  | $ | 11,197 |  |  | $ | 10,845 |  |  | $ | 352 |  |  | 3.2%
Properties acquired during prior-year period | 492 |  |  | 178 |  |  | 314 |  |  | 176.4% |  | 3,288 |  |  | 1,475 |  |  | 1,813 |  |  | 122.9%
Properties acquired subsequent to prior-year period | 1,712 |  |  | — |  |  | 1,712 |  |  | — |  | 3,760 |  |  | — |  |  | 3,760 |  |  | —
Property with vacancy | 20 |  |  | 11 |  |  | 9 |  |  | 81.8% |  | 57 |  |  | 68 |  |  | (11 | ) |  | (16.2)%
| $ | 6,561 |  |  | $ | 4,467 |  |  | $ | 2,094 |  |  | 46.9% |  | $ | 18,302 |  |  | $ | 12,388 |  |  | $ | 5,914 |  |  | 47.7%

Rental revenues on a same-property basis increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, by 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively. These increases were primarily due to our general ability to renew existing leases at higher rates and earn additional revenue on capital improvements constructed on certain properties; however, these increases were partially offset (particularly in the three months ended September 30, 2017) by the recent renewals of two leases on two of our California farms that resulted in a 12.5% decrease to the aggregate rental rate on the two farms. Rental revenues from acquired properties increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, due to the additional revenues recorded from owning the 9 and 13 farms we acquired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, for the full three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, coupled with the additional revenues earned from the 16 new farms we acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016. We had one farm in Florida that was vacant for a portion of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Rental revenues from this farm increased for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods. In June 2016, the lease on the
35

Table of Contents
farm was terminated early, and the farm was subsequently re-leased at a lower rental rate, which drove the decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. However, we were able to renew the lease at an increased rental rate in August 2017, which led to an increase for the three months ended September 30, 2017.
Other Operating Revenues
Tenant recovery revenue represents real estate taxes and insurance premiums paid on certain of our properties that, per the respective leases, are required to be reimbursed to us by the tenant. Corresponding amounts were also recorded as property operating expenses during the respective periods.
Operating Expenses
Same-property Analysis (dollars in thousands)

Depreciation and amortization: | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Same-property basis | $ | 1,455 |  |  | $ | 1,365 |  |  | $ | 90 |  |  | 6.6% |  | $ | 2,844 |  |  | $ | 2,682 |  |  | $ | 162 |  |  | 6.0%
Properties acquired during prior-year period | 43 |  |  | 31 |  |  | 12 |  |  | 38.7% |  | 1,428 |  |  | 970 |  |  | 458 |  |  | 47.2%
Properties acquired subsequent to prior-year period | 526 |  |  | — |  |  | 526 |  |  | — |  | 770 |  |  | — |  |  | 770 |  |  | —
Property with vacancy | 27 |  |  | 36 |  |  | (9 | ) |  | (25.0)% |  | 81 |  |  | 92 |  |  | (11 | ) |  | (12.0)%
| $ | 2,051 |  |  | $ | 1,432 |  |  | $ | 619 |  |  | 43.2% |  | $ | 5,123 |  |  | $ | 3,744 |  |  | $ | 1,379 |  |  | 36.8%

Depreciation and amortization expense on a same-property basis increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily as a result of additional depreciation on site improvements completed on certain properties subsequent to September 30, 2016, partially offset by the expiration of certain lease intangible amortization periods subsequent to September 30, 2016. Depreciation and amortization expense on acquired properties increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, due to the additional depreciation and amortization expense recorded from owning the 9 and 13 farms we acquired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, for the full three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, coupled with the additional depreciation and amortization expense incurred on the 16 new farms we acquired subsequent to September 30, 2016. For our one property with vacancy, the decrease in depreciation and amortization for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, was due to an early lease termination, which resulted in the recognition of the remaining unamortized balance of the related lease intangibles directly into amortization expense.

Property operating expenses: | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change |  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Same-property basis | $ | 189 |  |  | $ | 154 |  |  | $ | 35 |  |  | 22.7% |  | $ | 618 |  |  | $ | 531 |  |  | $ | 87 |  |  | 16.4%
Properties acquired during prior-year period | 4 |  |  | 4 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | 21 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 250.0%
Properties acquired subsequent to prior-year period | 62 |  |  | — |  |  | 62 |  |  | — |  | 100 |  |  | — |  |  | 100 |  |  | —
Property with vacancy | 2 |  |  | 3 |  |  | (1 | ) |  | (33.3) |  | 8 |  |  | 8 |  |  | — |  |  | —
| $ | 257 |  |  | $ | 161 |  |  | $ | 96 |  |  | 59.6% |  | $ | 747 |  |  | $ | 545 |  |  | $ | 202 |  |  | 37.1%

Property operating expenses consist primarily of real estate taxes, insurance expense, and other overhead expenses paid for certain of our properties. Property operating expenses on a same-property basis increased by approximately $35,000 and $87,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the respective prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by a net increase in aggregate property tax expense (due to one of our pure, triple-net leases converting to a partial-net lease during the three months ended December 31, 2016, partially offset by a decrease in property taxes on certain properties that were entered into land conservation contracts under the California Land Conservation Act, which restricts the land to agricultural use and reduces the property tax assessment), as well as additional expenses incurred related to obtaining certain permits on one of our California properties. Property operating expenses on acquired properties increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to additional property taxes and other operating expenses owed on certain of the new farms we acquired during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and subsequent to September 30, 2016. On our overall portfolio, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we accrued approximately $177,000 and $501,000,
36

Table of Contents
respectively, of aggregate real estate taxes related to certain of our farms, as compared to approximately $111,000 and $355,000 for the respective prior-year periods.
Other Operating Expenses
Acquisition-related expenses generally consist of legal fees and fees incurred for third-party reports prepared in connection with potential acquisitions and the related due diligence analyses. Acquisition-related expenses decreased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to the differences in accounting treatment of such expenses incurred in connection with the properties acquired during each of the respective periods or expected to be acquired in the near future (i.e., acquisition costs are capitalized under ASC 360 if the acquisition is considered an asset acquisition, whereas such costs are expensed under ASC 805 if the acquisition is treated as a business combination). With our early adoption of ASU 2017-01, as defined in Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements," in the notes to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, we anticipate that most of our acquisitions will be treated as asset acquisitions, which will result in lower acquisition-related expenses, as the majority of these costs will be capitalized and included as part of the fair value allocation of the purchase price. As of September 30, 2017, we have capitalized approximately $21,000 of acquisition-related costs (which costs were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2017) related to farms we expect to acquire during the three months ending December 31, 2017, as these acquisitions are reasonably assured to be completed and are expected to be treated as asset acquisitions. These costs are included in Other assets, net on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2017.
The aggregate net fees to our Adviser, including both the management and incentive fees and any credits to those fees, increased for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the gross management fee increased by approximately $138,000 and $288,000, respectively, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to additional common equity raised since January 1, 2016. From January 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017, we have raised approximately $38.8 million of net proceeds (net of both direct costs and allocated indirect costs) through follow-on common stock offerings and our ATM Program, increasing the base on which the management fee is calculated, which, until March 31, 2017, was the book value of our common stockholders' equity. Pursuant to the Amended Advisory Agreement, which became effective beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, the base on which the management fee is calculated was adjusted to include, among other items, the balance of non-controlling interests in our operating partnership, which further increased the management fee recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Our Adviser also earned incentive fees during each of the periods presented, due to our pre-incentive fee funds from operations exceeding the required hurdle rate of the equity base applicable to each period (which was total stockholders' equity through March 31, 2017, as stipulated in our Advisory Agreement; and, beginning with the three months ended June 30, 2017, was Total Adjusted Equity (which includes non-controlling interests in the Operating Partnership), as stipulated in our Amended Advisory Agreement). The incentive fees earned by our Adviser (net of credits) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, increased by approximately $185,000 and $453,000, respectively, compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to increased rental revenues earned on properties acquired during and subsequent to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, outpacing the operating expenses (other than depreciation and amortization expense) incurred on such properties. The credit to the incentive fee of $54,000 that was recorded for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, represents an irrevocable waiver granted by our Adviser. See "Our Adviser and Administrator—Amended Advisory Agreement" above for further discussion on changes to the compensation terms stipulated in the Amended Advisory Agreement.
The administration fee paid to our Administrator increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to higher overall costs incurred by our Administrator and us using a higher share of our Administrator’s resources in relation to those used by other funds and affiliated companies serviced by our Administrator during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.
General and administrative expenses increased for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods. These increases were primarily driven by increased accounting fees (due to additional expenses related to new acquisitions and higher tax preparation fees), along with additional costs associated with the implementation of a new accounting system (which was completed during the three months ended June 30, 2016) and increased marketing and advertising efforts during the current year. These increases were largely offset by a decrease in bad debt expense, as we wrote off approximately $21,000 and $85,000 of deferred rent asset balances during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, related to a lease on one of our Florida farms that was terminated prior to its expiration. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, we wrote off approximately $46,000 of unallocated costs associated with the initial filing of our prior universal registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-194539) (the "2014 Registration Statement"), which was replaced with the 2017 Registration Statement.
37

Table of Contents
Other Income (Expense)
Other income, which consists primarily of interest patronage received from Farm Credit and interest earned on short-term investments, increased for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods. The increase in other income during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, was primarily due to additional interest patronage received from Farm Credit. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we recorded approximately $183,000 of interest patronage from Farm Credit related to interest accrued during 2016, compared to $94,000 of interest patronage received during the prior-year period. The receipt of this interest patronage resulted in a 17.2% decrease (approximately 61 basis points) in our effective interest rate on our aggregate borrowings from Farm Credit during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Interest expense increased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to increased overall borrowings. The weighted-average principal balance of our aggregate borrowings (excluding our 6.375% Series A Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Term Preferred Stock")) outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, was approximately $291.3 million and $265.2 million, respectively, as compared to $181.1 million and $169.5 million, respectively, for the respective prior-year periods. Including interest patronage received on our Farm Credit borrowings, the overall effective interest rate charged on our aggregate borrowings (excluding the impact of deferred financing costs) was 3.44% and 3.24% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to 3.29% and 3.20%, respectively, for the respective prior-year periods.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we paid aggregate distributions on our Term Preferred Stock (which distributions are treated similar to interest expense) of approximately $458,000 and $1.4 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $219,000 for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The offering of the Term Preferred Stock was completed in August 2016.
In connection with an ongoing project on one of our farms in Oregon, for which we are providing the capital to fund, among other improvements, irrigation upgrades and the planting of new blueberry bushes, certain blueberry bushes owned by us were removed during the three months ended September 30, 2017, to allow for the planting of new varieties of blueberry bushes. The bushes that were removed (and that were owned by us) had a net cost basis of approximately $55,000 at the time of their removal. In addition, we incurred approximately $23,000 of removal costs. As such, we recorded a total loss of approximately $78,000 related to the removal of these bushes, which is recorded as Loss on disposal of real estate asset on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Since our IPO in January 2013, we have invested approximately $406.6 million into 61 new farms, and we have expended or accrued an additional $19.2 million for improvements on existing properties. Our current short- and long-term sources of funds include cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, borrowings (including the undrawn commitments available under the MetLife Facility and the Farmer Mac Facility), and issuances of additional equity securities. Our current available liquidity is approximately $15.0 million, consisting of $3.1 million in cash and, based on the current level of collateral pledged, $11.9 million of availability under the MetLife Facility, subject to compliance with covenants.
As of September 30, 2017, our total-debt-to-total-capitalization ratio (including our Term Preferred Stock as debt), at book value, was 73.3%, compared to 72.8% as of December 31, 2016. However, on a fair value basis, our total-debt-to-total capitalization ratio (including our Term Preferred Stock as debt) as of September 30, 2017, was 60.7%, which is up from 59.3% as of December 31, 2016 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Information—Net Asset Value” below for an explanation of our fair value process).
Future Capital Needs
Our short- and long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of making distributions to stockholders (including non-controlling OP Unitholders) to maintain our qualification as a REIT, funding our general operating costs, making principal and interest payments on outstanding borrowings, making dividend payments on our Term Preferred Stock and, as capital is available, funding new farmland and farm-related acquisitions consistent with our investment strategy.
We believe that our current and short-term cash resources will be sufficient to fund our distributions to stockholders (including non-controlling OP Unitholders), service our debt, pay dividends on our Term Preferred Stock and fund our current operating costs in the near term. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, including future equity issuances (including, but not limited to, OP Units through our Operating Partnership as consideration for future
38

Table of Contents
acquisitions and shares of common stock through our ATM Program), long-term mortgage indebtedness and bond issuances and other secured and unsecured borrowings.
We intend to use a significant portion of any current and future available liquidity to purchase additional farms and farm-related properties. We continue to actively seek and evaluate acquisitions of additional farms and farm-related properties that satisfy our investment criteria, and our pipeline of potential acquisitions remains healthy. We currently have two properties under signed purchase and sale agreements for an aggregate proposed purchase price of approximately $8.6 million (a portion of which is expected to be paid in OP Units), which we expect to be consummated during the three months ending December 31, 2017. We currently have access to the capital required to complete these transactions for the proposed purchase price amounts; however, we continue to explore various options for access to additional capital. We also have many other properties that are in various other stages of our due diligence process, including several properties under signed, non-binding letters of intent. However, all potential acquisitions will be subject to our due diligence investigation of such properties, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying or acquiring any properties in the future.
Cash Flow Resources
The following table summarizes total cash flows for operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |  |  |  |
| 2017 |  | 2016 |  | $ Change |  | % Change
Net change in cash from: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Operating activities | $ | 7,671 |  |  | $ | 7,912 |  |  | $ | (241 | ) |  | (3.0)%
Investing activities | (125,288 | ) |  | (79,761 | ) |  | (45,527 | ) |  | 57.1%
Financing activities | 118,937 |  |  | 71,713 |  |  | 47,224 |  |  | 65.9%
Net change in Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,320 |  |  | $ | (136 | ) |  | $ | 1,456 |  |  | (1,070.6)%

Operating Activities
The majority of cash from operating activities is generated from the rental payments we receive from our tenants, which is first used to fund our property-level operating expenses, with any excess cash being primarily used for principal and interest payments on our borrowings, management fees to our Adviser, administrative fees to our Administrator and other corporate-level expenses. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily due to the receipt of two years of prepaid rent upon the closing of the three farms we acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2016, largely offset by additional rental payments received from farms we have acquired since September 30, 2016.
Investing Activities
The increase in cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily due to an increase in cash paid for acquisitions of new farms during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, which exceeded that of the prior-year period by approximately $51.8 million. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $6.7 million in cash paid for capital improvements made on existing properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the prior-year period.
Financing Activities
The increase in cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily due to increased net borrowings, as our net borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, were approximately $39.7 million more than that of the prior-year period, as well as the $38.5 million of aggregate net cash proceeds received from two overnight common stock offerings and additional issuances of common stock under our ATM Program during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. These increases were partially offset by the receipt of approximately $27.6 million of net proceeds from the issuance of our Term Preferred Stock during the prior-year period.
39

Table of Contents
Debt Capital
MetLife
As amended on October 5, 2016, in aggregate, our facility with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife") consists of $150.0 million of term notes and $50.0 million of revolving equity lines of credit (the "MetLife Facility"). In aggregate, we currently have approximately $131.2 million outstanding under the term notes that bear interest at a blended fixed rate of 3.30% per annum (which is fixed until January 5, 2027) and $6.1 million outstanding under the lines of credit that currently bear interest at 3.60% (which is variable). While approximately $57.4 million of the full commitment amount under the MetLife Facility remains undrawn (including approximately $5.3 million of aggregate amortizing principal payments made on the term notes), based on the current level of collateral pledged, we currently have approximately $11.9 million of availability under the facility.
Farmer Mac
As amended on June 16, 2016, our agreement with Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation ("Farmer Mac") provides for bond issuances up to an aggregate amount of $125.0 million (the "Farmer Mac Facility"). To date, we have issued aggregate bonds of approximately $85.9 million under the Farmer Mac Facility, and we currently have $84.5 million of bonds outstanding that bears interest at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.13% (which rates are fixed throughout the bonds' respective terms) and have a weighted-average maturity date of June 2021. While approximately $39.1 million of the full commitment balance remains undrawn, we currently have no additional availability under the Farmer Mac Facility based on the current level of collateral pledged. However, we expect to pledge certain additional potential new property acquisitions as collateral under the Farmer Mac Facility to utilize some or all of this remaining commitment balance. If we have not issued bonds such that the aggregate bond issuances total $125.0 million by December 11, 2018, Farmer Mac has the option to be relieved of its obligation to purchase additional bonds under this facility.
Farm Credit
Since September 19, 2014, we have closed on 15 separate loans with five different Farm Credit associations (including Farm Credit CFL, Farm Credit West, CF Farm Credit, Farm Credit FL, and NW Farm Credit, each as defined in Note 4, "Borrowings," in the notes to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements) for an aggregate amount of approximately $64.7 million (the "Farm Credit Notes Payable"). We currently have approximately $60.6 million outstanding under the Farm Credit Notes Payable that bear interest at an expected weighted-average effective interest rate (net of expected interest patronage) of 3.36% (which rates are fixed, on a weighted-average basis, until January, 2023) and have a weighted-average maturity date of December, 2030. While we do not currently have any additional availability under any of our Farm Credit programs based on the properties currently pledged as collateral, we expect to enter into additional borrowing agreements with existing and new Farm Credit associations in connection with certain potential new acquisitions in the future.
Equity Capital
During 2017, through the date of this filing, we have completed two separate overnight common stock offerings and have also issued shares of common stock through our ATM Program. In the aggregate, through these transactions, we have issued and sold a total of 3,441,188 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $40.8 million and net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses borne by us, of approximately $38.8 million. We used the proceeds received from these offerings to fund new acquisitions, repay existing indebtedness (which, in turn, was used to fund future farmland acquisitions), and for other general corporate purposes.
The 2017 Registration Statement permits us to issue up to an aggregate of $300.0 million in securities (including approximately $29.3 million originally reserved for issuance under our ATM Program), consisting of common stock, preferred stock, warrants, debt securities, depository shares, subscription rights and units, including through separate, concurrent offerings of two or more of such securities. To date, we have issued approximately $20.1 million of common stock under the 2017 Registration Statement (including approximately $6.0 million through our ATM Program).
In addition, we have the ability to, and may in the future, issue additional OP Units to third parties as consideration in future property acquisitions.
40

Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects our material contractual obligations as of September 30, 2017 (dollars in thousands):

|  |  |  | Payments Due During the
|  |  |  | Remaining Three Months of |  | Fiscal Years Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligation |  | Total |  | 2017 |  | 2018 – 2019 |  | 2020 – 2021 |  | 2022+
Debt obligations(1) |  | $ | 297,236 |  |  | $ | 601 |  |  | $ | 34,493 |  |  | $ | 33,726 |  |  | $ | 228,416 |
Interest on debt obligations(2) |  | 79,522 |  |  | 1,132 |  |  | 19,813 |  |  | 17,382 |  |  | 41,195 |
Term Preferred Stock(3) |  | 28,750 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 28,750 |  |  | — |
Term Preferred Stock dividends(3) |  | 3,671 |  |  | 458 |  |  | 1,836 |  |  | 1,377 |  |  | — |
Operating obligations(4) |  | 6,647 |  |  | 1,093 |  |  | 5,380 |  |  | 174 |  |  | — |
Operating lease obligations(5) |  | 284 |  |  | — |  |  | 96 |  |  | 96 |  |  | 92 |
Total |  | $ | 416,110 |  |  | $ | 3,284 |  |  | $ | 61,618 |  |  | $ | 81,505 |  |  | $ | 269,703 |

(1) | Debt obligations include all borrowings (consisting of mortgage notes and bonds payable and our lines of credit) outstanding as of September 30, 2017. Maturity dates of these debt obligations range from July 2018 to November 2041.

(2) | Interest on debt obligations includes estimated interest on our MetLife Lines of Credit. The balances and interest rates on our MetLife Lines of Credit are variable, thus the amounts of interest calculated for purposes of this table were based upon the balances and interest rates in place as of September 30, 2017.

(3) | Our Term Preferred Stock has a mandatory redemption date of September 30, 2021, and the related dividend payments are treated similar to interest expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(4) | Operating obligations represent commitments outstanding as of September 30, 2017. See Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the notes to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion on each of these operating obligations.

(5) | Operating lease obligations represent ground lease payments due on two of our Arizona farms (1,368 total acres), which are leased from the State of Arizona under leases expiring in February 2022 and February 2025, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2017, we did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Funds from Operations, Core Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed funds from operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the same basis as determined under GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses on property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We further present core FFO (“CFFO”) and adjusted FFO (“AFFO”) as additional non-GAAP financial measures of our operational performance, as we believe both CFFO and AFFO improve comparability on a period-over-period basis and are more useful supplemental metrics for investors to use in assessing our operational performance on a more sustainable basis than FFO. We believe that these additional performance metrics provide investors with additional insight to how management measures our ongoing performance, as each of CFFO and AFFO (and their respective per-share amounts) are used by management and our board of directors, as appropriate, in assessing overall performance, as well as in certain decision-making analysis, including, but not limited to, the timing of acquisitions and potential equity raises (and the type of securities to offer in any such equity raises), the determination of any fee credits and declarations of distributions on our common stock. We believe that net income is the most directly-comparable GAAP measure to each of FFO, CFFO and AFFO.
Specifically, we believe that FFO is helpful to investors in better understanding our operating performance, primarily because its calculation excludes depreciation and amortization expense on real estate assets, as we believe that GAAP historical cost depreciation of real estate assets is generally not correlated with changes in the value of those assets, particularly with farmland real estate, the value of which does not diminish in a predictable manner over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. Further, we believe that CFFO and AFFO are helpful in understanding our operating performance in that it removes certain items that, by their nature, are not comparable on a period-over-period basis and therefore tend to obscure actual operating performance. In addition, we believe that providing CFFO and AFFO as additional performance metrics allows investors to gauge our overall performance in a manner that is more similar to how our performance is measured by management (including their respective per-share amounts), as well as by analysts and the overall investment community.
41

Table of Contents
We calculate CFFO by adjusting FFO for the following items:

• | Acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition-related expenses (i.e., due diligence costs) are incurred for investment purposes and do not correlate with the ongoing operations of our existing portfolio. Further, due to the inconsistency in which these costs are incurred and how they have historically been treated for accounting purposes, we believe the exclusion of these expenses improves comparability of our results on a period-to-period basis.

• | Acquisition-related accounting fees. Certain auditing and accounting fees we incur are directly related to acquisitions and vary depending on the number and complexity of acquisitions completed during a period. Due to the inconsistency in which these costs are incurred, we believe the exclusion of these expenses improves comparability of our results on a period-to-period basis.

• | Other adjustments. We will adjust for certain non-recurring charges and receipts and will explain such adjustments accordingly.

Further, we calculate AFFO by adjusting CFFO for the following items:

• | Rent adjustments. This adjustment removes the effects of straight-lining rental income, as well as the amortization related to above-market lease values and accretion related to below-market lease values, deferred revenue and tenant improvements, resulting in rental income reflected on a modified accrual cash basis. In addition to these adjustments, we also modify our calculation in our definition of AFFO to provide greater consistency and comparability due to the period-to-period volatility in which cash rents are received. To coincide with our tenants’ harvest seasons, our leases typically provide for cash rents to be paid at various points throughout the lease year, usually annually or semi-annually. As a result, cash rents received during a particular period may not necessarily be comparable to other periods or represent the cash rents indicative of a given lease year. Therefore, we further adjust AFFO to normalize the cash rent received pertaining to a lease year over that respective lease year on a straight-line basis, resulting in cash rent being recognized ratably over the period in which the cash rent is earned.

• | Amortization of deferred financing costs. The amortization of costs incurred to obtain financing is excluded from AFFO, as it is a non-cash expense item that is not directly related to the performance of our properties.

We believe the foregoing adjustments aid our investors' understanding of our ongoing operational performance.
FFO, CFFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike FFO, CFFO and AFFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income, and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Comparisons of FFO, CFFO and AFFO, using the NAREIT definition for
FFO and the definitions above for CFFO and AFFO, to similarly-titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the definitions used by such REITs.
Diluted funds from operations ("Diluted FFO"), diluted core funds from operations ("Diluted CFFO") and diluted adjusted funds from operations ("Diluted AFFO") per share are FFO, CFFO and AFFO, respectively, divided by the weighted-average number of total shares (including shares of our common stock and OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners) outstanding on a fully-diluted basis during a period. We believe that diluted earnings (loss) per share is the most directly-comparable GAAP measure to each of Diluted FFO, CFFO and AFFO per share. Because many REITs provide Diluted FFO, CFFO and AFFO per share information to the investment community, we believe these are useful supplemental measures when comparing us to other REITs.
We believe that FFO, CFFO and AFFO and Diluted FFO, CFFO and AFFO per share are useful to investors because they provide investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO, CFFO and AFFO results in the same manner that investors use net income and EPS in evaluating net income.
42

Table of Contents
The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO, CFFO and AFFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 to the most directly-comparable GAAP measure, net income, and a computation of diluted FFO, CFFO and AFFO per share, using the weighted-average number of total shares (including shares of our common stock and OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners) outstanding during the respective periods (dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts):

|  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|  | 2017 |  | 2016 |  | 2017 |  | 2016
Net income |  | $ | (247 | ) |  | $ | 35 |  |  | $ | 181 |  |  | $ | 390 |
Plus: Real estate and intangible depreciation and amortization |  | 2,051 |  |  | 1,432 |  |  | 5,123 |  |  | 3,744 |
Plus: Loss on disposal of asset |  | 78 |  |  | — |  |  | 78 |  |  | — |
FFO available to common stockholders and OP Unitholders |  | 1,882 |  |  | 1,467 |  |  | 5,382 |  |  | 4,134 |
Plus: Acquisition-related expenses |  | 22 |  |  | 123 |  |  | 68 |  |  | 243 |
Plus: Acquisition-related accounting fees |  | 47 |  |  | 50 |  |  | 82 |  |  | 78 |
CFFO available to common stockholders and OP Unitholders |  | 1,951 |  |  | 1,640 |  |  | 5,532 |  |  | 4,455 |
Net rent adjustment |  | (174 | ) |  | (146 | ) |  | (465 | ) |  | (316 | )
Plus: Amortization of deferred financing costs |  | 130 |  |  | 66 |  |  | 366 |  |  | 135 |
AFFO available to common stockholders and OP Unitholders |  | $ | 1,907 |  |  | $ | 1,560 |  |  | $ | 5,433 |  |  | $ | 4,274 |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted |  | 12,271,925 |  |  | 10,018,331 |  |  | 11,512,968 |  |  | 10,001,466 |
Weighted-average OP Units outstanding(1) |  | 1,444,435 |  |  | 854,116 |  |  | 1,447,632 |  |  | 613,446 |
Weighted-average total shares outstanding |  | 13,716,360 |  |  | 10,872,447 |  |  | 12,960,600 |  |  | 10,614,912 |
Diluted FFO per weighted-average total share |  | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.13 |  |  | $ | 0.42 |  |  | $ | 0.39 |
Diluted CFFO per weighted-average total share |  | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.15 |  |  | $ | 0.43 |  |  | $ | 0.42 |
Diluted AFFO per weighted-average total share |  | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.42 |  |  | $ | 0.40 |

(1) | Includes only OP Units held by third parties. As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were 1,227,383 and 1,215,306, respectively, OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners, representing 8.3% and 10.8%, respectively, of all OP Units issued and outstanding.

Net Asset Value
Real estate companies are required to record real estate using the historical cost basis of the real estate, adjusted for accumulated depreciation and amortization, and, as a result, the carrying value of the real estate does not typically change as the fair value of the assets change. Thus, a difficulty in owning shares of a real estate-based company is determining the fair value of the real estate so that stockholders can see the value of the real estate increase or decrease over time. For this reason, we believe determining the fair value of our real estate assets is useful to our investors.
Determination of Fair Value
Our Board of Directors reviews and approves the valuations of our properties pursuant to a valuation policy approved by our Board of Directors (the “Valuation Policy”). Such review and approval occurs in three phases: (i) prior to its quarterly meetings, the Board of Directors receives written valuation recommendations and supporting materials that are provided by professionals of the Adviser and Administrator, with oversight and direction from the chief valuation officer, who is also employed by the Administrator (collectively, the “Valuation Team”); (ii) the valuation committee of the Board of Directors (the “Valuation Committee”), which is comprised entirely of independent directors, meets to review the valuation recommendations and supporting materials; and (iii) after the Valuation Committee concludes its meeting, it and the chief valuation officer present the Valuation Committee’s findings to the entire Board of Directors so that the full Board of Directors may review and approve the fair values of our properties in accordance with the Valuation Policy. Further, on a quarterly basis, the Board of Directors reviews the Valuation Policy to determine if changes thereto are advisable and also reviews whether the Valuation Team has applied the Valuation Policy consistently.
Per the Valuation Policy, our valuations are derived based on the following:

• | For properties acquired within 12 months prior to the date of valuation, the purchase price of the property will generally be used as the current fair value unless overriding factors apply. In situations where OP Units are issued as partial or whole consideration in connection with the acquisition of a property, the fair value of the property will generally be the lower of: (i) the agreed-upon purchase price between the seller and the buyer (as shown in the purchase and sale agreement or contribution agreement and using the agreed-upon pricing of the OP Units, if applicable), or (ii) the value as determined by an independent, third-party appraiser.

43

Table of Contents

• | For real estate we acquired more than one year prior to the date of valuation, we determine the fair value either by relying on estimates provided by independent, third-party appraisers or through an internal valuation process. In addition, if significant capital improvements take place on a property, we will typically have those properties reappraised upon completion of the project by an independent, third-party appraiser. In any case, we intend to have each property valued by an independent, third-party appraiser at least once every three years, with interim values generally being determined by our internal valuation process.

Various methodologies were used, both by the appraisers and in our internal valuations, to determine the fair value of our real estate on a fee simple, “As Is” basis, including the sales comparison, income capitalization (or a discounted cash flow analysis) and cost approaches of valuation. In performing their analyses, the appraisers (i) performed site visits to the properties, (ii) discussed each property with our Adviser and reviewed property-level information, including, but not limited to, property operating data, prior appraisals (as available), existing lease agreements, farm acreage, location, access to water and water rights, potential for future development and other property-level information, and (iii) reviewed information from a variety of sources about regional market conditions applicable to each of our properties, including, but not limited to, recent sale prices of comparable farmland, market rents for similar farmland, estimated marketing and exposure time, market capitalization rates and the current economic environment, among others. In performing our internal valuations, we will consider the most recent appraisal available and use similar methodologies in determining an updated fair value. We will also obtain updated market data related to the property, such as updated sales and market rent comparisons and market capitalization rates, and perform an updated assessment of the tenants’ credit risk profiles, among others. Sources of this data may come from market inputs from recent acquisitions of our own portfolio of real estate, recent appraisals of properties we own that are similar in nature and in the same region (as applicable) as the property being valued, market conditions and trends we observe in our due diligence process and conversations with appraisers, brokers and farmers.
A breakdown of the methodologies used to value our properties and the aggregate value as of September 30, 2017, determined by each method is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands, except in footnotes):

Valuation Method |  | Number of Farms |  | Total Acres |  | Farm Acres |  | Net Cost Basis(1) |  | Current Fair Value |  | % of Total Fair Value
Purchase Price |  | 16 |  | 27,994 |  | 21,709 |  | $ | 140,051 |  |  | $ | 139,947 |  |  | 26.3%
Internal Valuation |  | 14 |  | 12,853 |  | 10,071 |  | 93,354 |  |  | 143,560 |  | (2) | 27.0%
Third-party Appraisal(3) |  | 42 |  | 20,947 |  | 17,887 |  | 213,927 |  |  | 248,157 |  |  | 46.7%
Total |  | 72 |  | 61,794 |  | 49,667 |  | $ | 447,332 |  |  | $ | 531,664 |  |  | 100.0%

(1) | Consists of the initial acquisition price (including the costs allocated to both tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed), plus subsequent improvements and other capitalized costs paid for by us that were associated with the properties, and adjusted for accumulated depreciation and amortization.

(2) | 98.1% of this valuation, or approximately $140.8 million, is supported by values as determined by third-party appraisals performed between October 2014 and June 2016. The difference of approximately $2.8 million represents the net appreciation of those properties since the time of such appraisals, as determined in accordance with our Valuation Policy.

(3) | Appraisals performed between March 2017 and October 2017.

Some of the significant assumptions used by appraisers and the Valuation Team in valuing our portfolio as of September 30, 2017, include land values per farmable acre, market rental rates per farmable acre and capitalization rates, among others. These assumptions were applied on a farm-by-farm basis and were selected based on several factors, including comparable land sales, surveys of both existing and current market rates, discussions with other brokers and farmers, soil quality, size, location and other factors deemed appropriate. A summary of these significant assumptions is provided in the following table:

|  | Appraisal Assumptions |  | Internal Valuation Assumptions
|  | Range (Low - High) |  | Weighted Average |  | Range (Low - High) |  | Weighted Average
Land Value (per farmable acre) |  | $815 – $103,000 |  | $ | 39,325 |  |  | $4,123 – $105,000 |  | $ | 51,376 |
Market Rent (per farmable acre) |  | $261 – $4,864 |  | $ | 1,858 |  |  | $215 – $4,500 |  | $ | 1,996 |
Market Capitalization Rate |  | 3.44% – 5.49% |  | 4.47% |  | 3.12% – 5.87% |  | 4.04%

Note: Figures in the table above apply only to the farmland portion of our portfolio and exclude assumptions made relating to farm-related property, such as cooling facilities and box barns, and other structures on our properties, including residential housing and horticulture, as their aggregate value was considered to be insignificant in relation to that of the farmland.
Our Valuation Team reviews the appraisals, including the significant assumptions and inputs used in determining the appraised values, and considers any developments that may have occurred since the time the appraisals were performed. Developments considered that may have an impact on the fair value of our real estate include, but are not limited to, changes in tenant credit
44

Table of Contents
profiles; changes in lease terms, such as expirations and notices of non-renewals or to vacate; and potential asset sales, particularly those at prices different from the appraised values of our properties.
Management believes that the purchase prices of the farms acquired during the previous 12 months, the most recent appraisals available for the farms acquired prior to the previous 12 months that were not valued internally and the farms that were valued internally during the previous 12 months fairly represent the current market values of the properties as of September 30, 2017, and, accordingly, did not make any adjustment to these values.
A quarterly roll-forward of the change in our portfolio value for the three months ended September 30, 2017, from the prior value basis as of June 30, 2017, is provided in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Total portfolio fair value as of June 30, 2017 |  | $ | 492,972 |
Plus: Acquisition of seven new farms during the three months ended September 30, 2017 |  | 38,178 |
Plus net value appreciation (depreciation) during the three months ended September 30, 2017: |  |
13 farms valued via third-party appraisals | $ | 514 |  |
Total net appreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2017 |  | 514 |
Total portfolio fair value as of September 30, 2017 |  | $ | 531,664 |

Management also determined fair values of all of its long-term borrowings. Using a discounted cash flow analysis, management determined that the fair value of all long-term encumbrances on our properties as of September 30, 2017, was approximately $286.3 million, as compared to a carrying value (excluding unamortized related debt issuance costs) of $292.1 million. In addition, using the closing stock price as of September 30, 2017, the fair value of the Term Preferred stock was determined to be approximately $29.8 million, as compared to a carrying value (excluding unamortized related issuance costs) of $28.8 million.
Calculation of Estimated Net Asset Value
To provide our stockholders with an estimate of the fair value of our real estate assets, we intend to estimate the fair value of our farm properties, expressed in terms of net asset value (“NAV”), and provide that to our stockholders on a quarterly basis. NAV is a non-GAAP, supplemental measure of financial position of an equity REIT and is calculated as total equity, adjusted for the increase or decrease in fair value of our real estate assets and long-term borrowings (including any preferred stock required to be treated as debt for GAAP purposes) relative to their respective costs bases. Further, we calculate NAV per common share by dividing NAV by our total common shares outstanding (consisting of our common stock and OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners). A reconciliation of NAV to total equity, which the Company believes is the most directly-comparable GAAP measure, is provided below.
The fair values presented above and their usage in the calculation of net asset value per share presented below have been prepared by and is the responsibility of management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has neither examined, compiled nor performed any procedures with respect to the fair values or the calculation of net asset value per common share, which utilizes information that is not disclosed within the financial statements, and, accordingly, does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.
As of September 30, 2017, we estimate our NAV per common share to be $14.15, as detailed below (dollars in thousands, except per-share amount):

Total equity per balance sheet |  |  |  | $ | 118,986 |
Fair value adjustment for long-term assets: |  |  |  |
Less: net cost basis of tangible and intangible real estate holdings(1) |  | $ | (447,332 | ) |  |
Plus: estimated fair value of real estate holdings(2) |  | 531,664 |  |  |
Net fair value adjustment for real estate holdings |  |  |  | 84,332 |
Fair value adjustment for long-term liabilities: |  |  |  |
Plus: book value of aggregate long-term indebtedness(3) |  | 320,886 |  |  |
Less: fair value of aggregate long-term indebtedness(3)(4) |  | (316,086 | ) |  |
Net fair value adjustment for long-term indebtedness |  |  |  | 4,800 |
Estimated NAV |  |  |  | $ | 208,118 |
Total shares outstanding(5) |  |  |  | 14,712,408 |
Estimated NAV per common share |  |  |  | $ | 14.15 |

(1) | Per Net Cost Basis as presented in the table above.

45

Table of Contents

(2) | Per Current Fair Value as presented in the table above.

(3) | Includes the principal balances outstanding of all long-term borrowings (consisting of mortgage notes and bonds payable) and the Term Preferred Stock.

(4) | Long-term mortgage notes and bonds payable were valued using a discounted cash flow model. The Term Preferred Stock was valued based on its closing stock price as of September 30, 2017.

(5) | Includes 13,485,025 shares of common stock and 1,227,383 OP Units held by non-controlling limited partners (representing 8.3% of all OP Units issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017).

A quarterly roll-forward in the estimated NAV per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2017, is provided below:

Estimated NAV per common share as of June 30, 2017 |  |  |  | $ | 14.46 |
Plus net income |  |  |  | (0.02 | )
Plus change in valuations: |  |  |  |
Net change in unrealized appreciation of farmland portfolio(1) |  | $ | — |  |  |
Net change in unrealized fair value of long-term indebtedness |  | 0.10 |  |  |
Net change in valuations |  |  |  | 0.10 |
Less distributions |  |  |  | (0.13 | )
Less dilutive effect of equity issuances(2) |  |  |  | (0.26 | )
Estimated NAV per common share as of September 30, 2017 |  |  |  | $ | 14.15 |

(1) | The net change in unrealized appreciation of farmland portfolio consists of three components: (i) an increase of $0.04 due to the net appreciation in value of 13 farms that were valued during the three months ended September 30, 2017, (ii) an increase of $0.15 due to the aggregate depreciation and amortization expense recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2017, and (iii) a decrease of $0.19 due to capital improvements made on certain properties that have not been considered in the determination of the respective properties’ estimated fair values.

(2) | Reflective of the September 2017 Follow-on Offering and shares of common stock sold under the ATM Program during the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Comparison of estimated NAV and estimated NAV per common share, using the definitions above, to similarly-titled measures for other REITs, may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the calculation or application of the definition of NAV used by such REITs. In addition, the trading price of our common shares may differ significantly from our most recent estimated NAV per common share calculation. For example, while we estimated the NAV per share as of September 30, 2017, to be $14.15 per the calculation above, the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2017, was $13.62, and it has subsequently traded between $13.01 and $14.29 per share.
While management believes the values presented reflect current market conditions, the ultimate amount realized on any asset will be based on the timing of such dispositions and the then-current market conditions. There can be no assurance that the ultimate realized value upon disposition of an asset will approximate the estimated fair value above.
We intend to report any adjustments to the estimated NAV, as well as to the values of our properties, in this section on a quarterly basis, but in no case less than annually. However, the determination of estimated NAV is subjective and involves a number of assumptions, judgments and estimates, and minor adjustments to these assumptions, judgments or estimates may have a material impact on our overall portfolio valuation. In addition, many of the assumptions used are sensitive to market conditions and can change frequently. Changes in the market environment and other events that may occur during our ownership of these properties may cause the values reported above to vary from the actual fair value that may be obtained in the open market.
46

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market-sensitive instruments. The primary market risk that we believe we are and will be exposed to is interest rate risk. Certain of our existing leases contain escalations based on market indices, and certain of our existing borrowings are subject to variable interest rates. Further, the interest rates on certain of our fixed-rate borrowings are either fixed for a finite period before converting to variable rate or are subject to periodic adjustments. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring certain provisions into many of our leases, such as escalation clauses or adjusting the rent to prevailing market rents at two- to three-year intervals, these features do not eliminate this risk. To date, we have not entered into any derivative contracts to attempt to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
As of September 30, 2017, excluding our Term Preferred Stock, the fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings outstanding, which accounted for approximately 98.3% of our total indebtedness, at cost, as of September 30, 2017, was approximately $286.3 million. However, interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings. If market interest rates had been one percentage point lower or higher than those rates in place as of September 30, 2017, the fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings would have increased or decreased by approximately $13.8 million or $12.8 million, respectively.
There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative market risk disclosures for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, from that disclosed in our Form 10-K.

ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2017, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017, in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
47

Table of Contents
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. | Legal Proceedings

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are any such material legal proceedings threatened against us.

Item 1A. | Risk Factors

Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our securities. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to the section captioned, "Item 1A. Risk Factors," in our Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to risks associated with our business or investment in our securities from those previously set forth in the report described above.

Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock in exchange for 50,000 OP Units that were held by certain limited partners of our Operating Partnership in connection with certain of our prior acquisitions. OP Units are generally redeemable for cash or, at our discretion, exchangeable into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. The cash redemption amount per OP Unit is based on the market price of a shares of our common stock at the time of redemption. These shares of common stock were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We relied on the exemption under Section 4(a)(2) based upon factual representations received from the limited partners who received the shares of common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.

Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. | Other Information

None.
48

Table of Contents

Item 6. | Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number |  | Exhibit Description
3.1 |  | Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-183965), filed on November 2, 2012.
3.2 |  | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-183965), filed on November 15, 2012.
3.3 |  | Articles Supplementary 6.375% Series A Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35795), filed on August 11, 2016.
3.4 |  | Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35795), filed on July 12, 2017.
4.1 |  | Form of Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-183965), filed December 27, 2012.
4.2 |  | Form of Certificate for 6.375% Series A Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-35795), filed on August 11, 2016.
11 |  | Computation of Per Share Earnings from Operations.
31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS*** |  | XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*** |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*** |  | XBRL Definition Linkbase

*** | Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

49

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| Gladstone Land Corporation
Date: November 7, 2017 | By: |  | /s/ Lewis Parrish
|  |  | Lewis Parrish
|  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer
Date: November 7, 2017 | By: |  | /s/ David Gladstone
|  |  | David Gladstone
|  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

50