XML 45 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.24.0.1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2023
Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Business and Organization MVB Financial Corp. is a financial holding company organized in 2003 as a West Virginia corporation that operates principally through its wholly-owned subsidiary, MVB Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”). The Bank’s consolidated subsidiaries include MVB Edge Ventures, LLC (“Edge Ventures”), Paladin Fraud, LLC (“Paladin Fraud”) and MVB Insurance, LLC, (“MVB Insurance”). The Bank owns a controlling interest in Trabian Technology, Inc. (“Trabian”). Edge Ventures wholly-owns Victor Technologies, Inc. (“Victor”) and MVB Technology, LLC ("MVB Technology"). The Bank also owns an equity method investment in Intercoastal Mortgage Company, LLC (“ICM”) and MVB Financial Corp. owns equity method investments in Warp Speed Holdings, LLC (“Warp Speed”) and Ayers Socure II, LLC (“Ayers Socure II”). MVB Financial's consolidated subsidiaries also includes SPE PR, LLC ("MVB-PR"). Through our professional services entities, which include Paladin Fraud and Trabian, we provide consulting solutions to assist Fintech and corporate clients in building digital products and meeting their fraud defense needs. In February 2023, we completed the sale of the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, ProCo Global, Inc. (“Chartwell,” which does business under the registered trade name Chartwell Compliance). In May 2023, we entered into an agreement with Flexia Payments, LLC ("Flexia," in which Edge Ventures owned a controlling interest), to facilitate the divestiture of our interests in the ongoing business of Flexia. Refer to Note 25 – Acquisitions and Divestitures. We conduct a wide range of business activities through the Bank, primarily commercial and retail (“CoRe”) banking services, as well as Fintech banking. CoRe Banking We offer our customers a full range of products and services including:
l | Various demand deposit accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit;
l | Commercial, consumer and real estate mortgage loans and lines of credit;
l | Debit cards;
l | Cashier’s checks;
l | Safe deposit rental facilities;
l | Non-deposit investment services offered through an association with a broker-dealer; and
l | Insurance and investment services.
Fintech Banking We provide innovative strategies to independent banking and corporate clients throughout the United States. Our dedicated Fintech team specializes in providing banking services to corporate Fintech clients, with a primary focus on operational risk management and compliance. Managing banking relationships with clients in the payments, digital savings, digital assets, crowd funding, lottery and gaming industries is complex, from both an operational and regulatory perspective. We believe that the complexity of serving these industries causes them to be underserved with quality banking services and provides us with a significantly expanded pool of potential customers. When serviced in a safe and efficient manner, we believe these industries provide a source of stable, lower cost deposits and noninterest, fee-based income. We thoroughly analyze each industry in which our customers operate, as well as any new products or services provided, from both an operational and regulatory perspective. Edge Ventures Edge Ventures, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, was created as a management company to provide oversight, alignment and structure for our Fintech companies and allocate resources to help incubate venture businesses and technologies acquired and developed by us. Victor Victor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Edge Ventures. Victor was formed to develop technology to make it faster and easier to launch and scale a broad spectrum of Fintech solutions for the gaming, payments, banking-as-a-service and digital asset sectors. Within a matter of weeks, Fintech developers can build solutions to manage and move money with developer-friendly application programming interfaces. Banks can onboard and manage more programs with Victor’s tailored due diligence, risk assessment and oversight workflow tools. Recognizing the complexity of the Fintech ecosystem, Victor also supports seamless integration with a proven network of value-added technology and service providers. Professional Services Paladin Fraud Paladin Fraud is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. Paladin Fraud provides an extensive and customizable suite of fraud prevention services for merchants, credit agencies, Fintech companies and other vendors to help clients and partners defend against threats. Trabian The Bank owns an 80.8% interest in Trabian. Trabian builds digital products and web and mobile applications for forward-thinking community banks, credit unions, digital banks and Fintech companies. Consistent with the Bank's mission to pursue technology to accelerate community finance, Trabian has created technology platforms that have been instrumental to the success of many of today’s leading Fintech companies. Basis of Presentation The financial statements are consolidated to include the accounts of MVB and its subsidiaries, including the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiaries. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial statements for interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) as presented through the Financial Accounting Statement Board's ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") and with rules and interpretive guidance of the Security and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidated financial statements. Wholly-owned investments or investments in which we have a controlling financial interest, whether majority owned or in certain circumstances a minority interest, are required to be consolidated into our financial statements. We evaluate investments in entities on an ongoing basis to determine the need to consolidate. The Bank owns an 80.8% interest in Trabian, which grants us a controlling interest. Accordingly, we are required to consolidate 100% of Trabian within the consolidated financial statements. The remaining interests of Trabian are accounted for separately as noncontrolling interest within our consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interest represents the portion of ownership and profit or loss that is attributable to the minority owners of these entities. Unconsolidated investments where we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the respective investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Those investments that are not consolidated or accounted for using the equity method of accounting are accounted for under cost or fair value accounting. For investments accounted for under the equity method, we record our investment in non-consolidated affiliates and the portion of income or loss in equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates. We periodically evaluate these investments for impairment. As of December 31, 2023, we hold three equity method investments. See Note 5 – Equity Method Investments for further information. Preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based upon the best available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. An estimate that is particularly significant to the consolidated financial statements relates to the determination of the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”). In certain instances, amounts reported in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. We have evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents include cash on hand, non-interest and interest-bearing deposits with banks. Interest-bearing deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less are considered cash equivalents. Net cash flows are reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows for loans, deposits and short-term borrowing transactions. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 there was no restricted cash. Investment Securities Investment securities at the time of purchase are classified as one of the following: Available-for-Sale Securities - Includes debt that will be held for indefinite periods of time. These securities may be sold in response to changes in market interest or prepayment rates, needs for liquidity and changes in the availability of and yield of alternative investments. Such securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of estimated income tax effect. The income tax effect is released when the securities are sold. Equity Securities - Includes equity securities that are adjusted to fair value on a monthly basis, with the change in value recorded directly on the income statement. We have elected to measure the equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for underlying transactions for identical or similar investments of new issues. The amortized cost of investment in debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, computed by a method that results in a level yield. Gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are computed on the basis of specific identification of the adjusted cost of each security. Our investment portfolio includes securities that are in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2023. We evaluate available-for-sale debt securities to determine whether the unrealized loss is due to credit-related factors or non-credit-related factors. When determining the ACL on securities, we consider such factors as adverse conditions specifically related to a certain security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area, the time frame securities have been in an unrealized loss position, our ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value, whether or not the security has been downgraded by a rating agency and whether or not the financial condition of the security issuer has severely deteriorated. When debt securities are in an unrealized loss position, we first assess whether we intend to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. Debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria are evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that an ACL exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an ACL is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an ACL is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance are recorded as provision for, or reversal of, credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the ACL when management believes the uncollectibility of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. Securities are charged-off against the ACL or, in the absence of any ACL, written down through income when deemed uncollectible by management or when either of the aforementioned criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh, and as such, is required to maintain a minimum investment in stock of the FHLB that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the FHLB. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Bank holds $2.1 million and $10.0 million of stock, respectively, which is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets. The stock is bought from and sold to the FHLB based upon its $100 per share par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated by management for impairment. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (i) a significant decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted; (ii) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance; (iii) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB; and (iv) the liquidity position of the FHLB. Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein. Management considered that the FHLB’s regulatory capital ratios have improved in the most recent quarters, no issues of liquidity are evident, new shares of FHLB stock continue to trade at the $100 per share par value and the FHLB has repurchased shares of excess capital stock from its members during 2023 and 2022. Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses Beginning January 2023, our methodology for determining the ACL is based on the requirements of ASC 326. Loans are stated at amortized cost basis reduced by an ACL. Loans are considered non-accrual when scheduled principal or interest payments are 90 days past due. Interest income on loans is recognized on an accrual basis. The ACL is maintained at a level deemed adequate to absorb forecasted losses over the remaining life of each loan within the portfolio. We consistently apply a quarterly loan review process to continually evaluate loans for changes in credit risk. This process serves as the primary means by which we evaluate the adequacy of the ACL, and is based upon periodic review of the collectability of loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually analyzed using either collateral based or cash flow based valuation methodology. The general component covers all loans that are not individually analyzed. These loans are measured on a collective basis and are pooled with other loans that share similar characteristics. Management has determined there to be several different portfolio segments sharing similar risk characteristics within the loan portfolio. Factors considered in this process include general loan terms, collateral and availability of historical data to support the analysis, with the initial segmentation based on Call Codes. The ACL is calculated for each segment using a discounted cash flow methodology at the loan level, with loss rates, prepayment assumptions and curtailment assumptions driven by each loan’s collateral type. The sub-prime automobile loan segment uses a remaining life methodology using straight-line amortization over the remaining life of the portfolio, due to unique characteristics of this pool. Through a loss driver analysis performed by a third-party vendor, a forecasting model that correlates specific economic factors with credit quality of each loan segment was developed. Peer bank data was identified and used in this process, as we did not have adequate quarterly loan data to analyze over the look-back period to 2007. After the third-party analyzed both historical peer loan data and various economic factors over the same look-back period, two economic variables, national GDP and national unemployment rate, were identified as showing the most correlation to the performance of the loans within each of the pooled segments. Within each loan segment forecast, these two economic variables are forecasted based on expected trends over a 12-month period, before reverting to the long-term average quarterly rate of each variable over the next 12-month period, then maintains this quarterly average for the life of the loan segment. The third-party vendor uses these variables to produce an estimated probability of default for each quarter period and, through a proprietary model, also calculates a loss given default factor to estimate overall losses. The vendor also prepares benchmark studies for prepayment and curtailment rate estimates for each loan segment, as well as recovery lag estimates. With all these factors combined, a forecasted allocation rate is produced for each loan segment. Certain qualitative factors are evaluated to determine additional inherent risks in the loan portfolio, which are not necessarily reflected in the loss forecasting models. These factors are then added to the forecasted allocation percentages to get the adjusted factor to be applied to the pooled loans on a weighted basis. The following qualitative factors are analyzed:
l | Lending policies and procedures
l | Nature and volume of the portfolio
l | Experience and ability of lending management and staff
l | Volume and severity of problem credits
l | Conclusions of loan reviews, audits and exams
l | Value of the underlying collateral
l | Concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such concentrations
l | Economic and business conditions & consumer sentiment
l | Other external factors
We analyze our loan portfolio each quarter to determine the appropriateness of our ACL. A loan that has deteriorated and requires additional collection efforts by the Bank could warrant non-accrual status. A thorough review is presented to the Chief Credit Officer and/or the Special Assets Review Committee (“SARC”), as required with respect to any loan which is in a collection process and to make a determination as to whether the loan should be placed on non-accrual status. The placement of loans on non-accrual status is subject to applicable regulatory restrictions and guidelines. Generally, loans should be placed in non-accrual status when the loan reaches 90 days past due, when it becomes likely the borrower cannot or will not make scheduled principal or interest payments, when full repayment of principal and interest is not expected, or when the loan displays potential loss characteristics. Normally, all accrued interest is reversed against interest income when a loan is placed in non-accrual status, unless Management believes it is likely the accrued interest will be collected. Any payments subsequently received are applied to principal. To remove a loan from non-accrual status, all principal and interest due must be paid up to date and the Bank is reasonably sure of future satisfactory payment performance. Usually, this requires a six-month recent history of payments due. Removal of a loan from non-accrual status will require the approval of the Chief Credit Officer and/or SARC. Loans are moved to individual analysis when, based on current information and events, the loan no longer exhibits similar risk characteristics as its pool, and we analyze the loan individually on a collateral or cash flow basis. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. We also separately evaluate consumer loans for individual analysis. Loans are identified individually by monitoring the delinquency status of the Bank’s portfolio. Once identified, the Bank’s ongoing communications with the borrower allow evaluation of the significance of the payment delays and the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower. When Bank management determines that foreclosure is probable or when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the reporting date and repayment is expected to be substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for selling costs as appropriate. To estimate the liability for off-balance sheet credit exposures, management analyzes the portfolios of unfunded commitments based on the same segmentation used for the ACL calculation. The estimated funding rate for each segment was derived from a funding rate study created by a third-party vendor, which analyzed funding of various loan types over time to develop industry benchmarks at the call report code level. Once the estimated future advances were calculated, the allocation rate applicable to that portfolio segment was applied in the same manner as those used for the ACL calculation. The resulting estimated loss allocations were totaled to determine the liability for unfunded commitments related to these loans, which management considers necessary to anticipate potential losses on those commitments that have a reasonable probability of funding. Once the determination has been made that a loan is to be individually analyzed, the amount of potential credit loss is measured using one of two valuation methods: (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; or (ii) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. The method is selected on a loan-by-loan basis, with management primarily utilizing the fair value of collateral method. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from individual analysis status is made on a quarterly basis. We defer loan origination and commitment fees and direct loan origination costs and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield. Loans Held-for-Sale Loans originated or purchased with the intent to sell are designated as held-for-sale. Loans held-for-sale are carried at fair value, which is determined using quoted secondary market prices or investor commitments when possible. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan, which would be used by other market participants. If the fair value at the reporting date exceeds the amortized cost of a loan, the loan is reported at amortized cost. Loans are occasionally transferred between the held-for-sale and held-for-investment classifications based on management’s intent and ability to hold or sell loan, which may be impacted by secondary market conditions, loan credit quality or other factors. Premises and Equipment Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation, while land is carried at cost. Depreciation expense is computed by the straight-line-method based on the estimated useful lives of assets, which range from seven to 40 years for buildings, three to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, three years for software and lesser of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements. Software Development Software that we develop for internal use may be capitalized when costs are incurred after the preliminary project stage has ended and the application development stage begins. The application development stage includes designing, coding, installing and testing the software. Once the software has been implemented, costs for training and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Capitalized internal use software development costs are included in premises and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Bank-Owned Life Insurance Bank-owned life insurance represents life insurance on the lives of certain of our employees who have provided positive consent allowing us to be the beneficiary of such policies. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value or the amount that can be realized upon surrender of the policy. Income from these policies is not subject to income taxes and is recorded as noninterest income. Equity Method Investments Investments in companies in which we have significant influence over the operating and financing decisions are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Determining if we have significant influence requires judgement based on the facts and circumstances of each investment including level of ownership, legal structure and other qualitative factors which impact our ability to influence the investee's operations, and we review the facts and circumstances each reporting period to determine if we still have significant influence. Equity method investments are recorded initially at cost including costs to acquire the investment. These investments are included in the equity method investments line item on the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the investee's profits and losses in the equity method investments income line item. At the time of investment, we may make a one-time election to record our proportionate share of earnings of the investee on a lag of no more than three months. This election may be made on an investment by investment basis. We review equity method investments for impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances which indicate the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable. Intangible Assets and Goodwill Goodwill is the purchase premium after adjusting for the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment on an annual basis, or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment, at the related reporting unit level. The goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge must be recorded. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit. An impairment loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill and subsequent reversals of goodwill impairment losses are not permitted under applicable accounting guidance. For intangible assets subject to amortization, the recoverability test is performed when a triggering event occurs and an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds fair value and is not recoverable. The carrying value of the intangible asset is considered not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. Intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives are not subject to amortization. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the intangible asset with an indefinite life exceeds its fair value. Derivative Instruments Interest Rate Swaps We entered into interest rate swap agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking clients. We mitigate this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements with highly rated third-party financial institutions. The interest rate swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. Fair value changes are recorded in noninterest income in our consolidated net income statement. Fair Value Hedges We entered into portfolio layer method fair value swaps, designated as hedging instruments, to mitigate the effect of changing interest rates on the fair values of certain designated fixed-rate loans and available-for-sale securities. This involves the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Under the portfolio layer method, the hedged items are designated as a hedged layer of closed portfolios of financial loans and municipal bonds that are anticipated to remain outstanding for the designated hedged periods. Adjustments are made to record the swaps at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair value recognized in interest income. The carrying values of the fair value swaps on the consolidated balance sheets are also adjusted through interest income and other comprehensive income, based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk. Embedded Derivatives We enter into various contracts through the normal course of business and occasionally a contract may include terms and conditions that create an embedded derivative. An embedded derivative may occur even though the purpose of the contract is not intended to be a derivative contract. Components of a contract should be assessed to determine if they meet the definition of a derivative. If it does, we must then assess whether the embedded derivative is clearly and closely related to its host instrument. If the derivative is not clearly and closely related to the host contract, the embedded derivative must be separated from the host instrument and accounted for as a separate derivative. Servicing Assets Servicing assets are recorded when the Bank sells loans and retains the servicing on those loans. On a monthly basis, we track the amount of loans that are sold with servicing retained. We determine the servicing rights value, which is then recorded as an asset and amortized over the period of estimated net servicing revenues. The servicing assets are evaluated for impairment quarterly. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting payments from borrowers, maintaining escrow accounts, remitting payments to third party investors and, when necessary, foreclosure processing. Serviced loans are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the value of servicing assets was $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. We have the ability to sell the guaranteed portion of loans originated through the SBA's 7(a) program. All SBA loan sales are executed on a servicing retained basis. We are required to retain a minimum of 10% of the principal balance in accordance with SBA regulations. Any gain on sale recognized as income is the sum of the premium on the guaranteed portion of the loan and the fair value of the servicing assets recognized, less the discount recorded on the unguaranteed portion of the loan that is retained. The remaining unguaranteed portion of the loan is presented net of the discount, which is recognized as interest income over the underlying loan's remaining term, using the effective interest method. Foreclosed Assets Held for Resale Foreclosed assets held for resale acquired in satisfaction of mortgage obligations and in foreclosure proceedings are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis, with any valuation adjustments charged to the ACL. In subsequent periods, foreclosed assets are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less any costs to sell. Costs relating to improvement of the property are capitalized, while holding costs of the property are charged to other loan origination and maintenance expense in the period incurred. Subsequent declines in fair value and gains or losses on sale are recorded in other noninterest expense and included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Fair Value Measurements Accounting standards require that we adopt fair value measurement for financial assets and financial liabilities. This enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This guidance does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The following summarizes the methods and significant assumptions we use in estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments.
Level I: | Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level II: | Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available, but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
Level III: | Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
Transfers of assets and liabilities between levels within the fair value hierarchy are recognized when an event or change in circumstances occurs. Revenue Recognition We record revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, we must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation. Significant revenue has not been recognized in the current reporting period that results from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods. Our primary sources of revenue are derived from interest and fees earned on loans, investment securities and other financial instruments that are not within the scope of ASC 606. We have evaluated the nature of our contracts with customers and determined that our revenue from contracts with customers is appropriately disaggregated in our consolidated statement of income is not currently necessary. We generally fully satisfy our performance obligations on our contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices are typically fixed within each contract, charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Because performance obligations are satisfied as services are rendered and the transaction prices are fixed, there is little judgment involved in applying ASC 606 that significantly affects the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with customers. Payment Card and Service Charge Income Payment card and service charge income are comprised of service charges on accounts and interchange and debit card transaction fees. Service charges on accounts consist of account analysis fees, monthly service fees, check orders and other account related fees. Our performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other account related fees are largely transactional based and therefore, our performance obligation is satisfied and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. Interchange and debit card transaction fees are primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Bank’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks. The Bank’s performance obligation for debit card and interchange income is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, on a transactional basis. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. We also enter into interchange arrangements with minimum commitment fees. Minimum commitment fees are recognized ratably, until such time that minimum commitment fees are exceeded or expected to be exceeded. Compliance and Consulting Income Compliance and consulting income is comprised revenue generated by Paladin Fraud and Trabian. Paladin Fraud provides an extensive and customizable suite of fraud prevention services for merchants, credit agencies, Fintech companies and other vendors to help clients and partners defend against threats. Trabian provides consulting for the development of online and mobile banking platforms and digital products for Fintech companies. Paladin Fraud and Trabian account for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. The services promised are then evaluated in each contract at inception to determine whether the contract should be accounted for as having one or more performance obligations. Paladin Fraud and Trabian's services included in our contracts are distinct from one another. The transaction price for each contract is determined based upon the consideration expected to be received for the distinct services being provided under the contract. Revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied and the customer obtains control of the goods or services provided. In determining when performance obligations are satisfied, factors considered include contract terms, payment terms and whether there is an alternative future use of the product or service. Consulting engagements may vary in length and scope, but will generally include the review and/or preparation of regulatory filings, business plans, financial models and other risk management services to customers within financial industries. Revenue from consulting services is recognized on a pro rata basis based upon actual labor hours completed as compared to budgeted labor hours for the deliverable. Other Operating Income Other operating income is primarily comprised of ATM fees, wire transfer fees, travelers check fees, revenue streams such as safe deposit box rental fees and other miscellaneous service charges. ATM fees, wire transfer fees and travelers check fees are primarily generated when a Bank’s cardholder uses a non-Bank ATM or a non-Bank cardholder uses a Bank ATM. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Bank determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks and other services. The Bank’s performance obligations for fees and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. The Bank’s performance obligation for the gains and losses on sales of other real estate owned is satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, after each sale of other real estate owned is closed. Stock-Based Compensation Compensation cost is recognized for stock options, performance-based restricted stock units ("PRSUs") and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Comprehensive Income Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, minimum pension liability and investment hedges, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income. Income Taxes The amount reflected as income taxes represents federal and state income taxes on financial statement income. Certain items of income and expense, primarily the provision for credit losses, allowance for losses on foreclosed assets held for resale, depreciation and accretion of discounts on investment securities are reported in different accounting periods for income tax purposes. We and the Bank file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement basis and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rates. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the net deferred tax asset or liability from period to period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the result of timing differences in recognition of revenue and expense for income tax and financial statement purposes. No deferred income tax valuation allowance is provided since it is more likely than not that realization of the deferred income tax asset will occur in future years. We prescribe a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be reversed in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. There is currently no liability for uncertain tax positions and no known unrecognized tax benefits. With limited exception, our federal and state income tax returns for taxable years through 2019 have been closed for purposes of examination by the federal and state taxing jurisdictions. Operating Segments An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities that generates revenue and incurs expense, and the operating results of which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in the determination of resource allocation and performance. While our chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of our various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a company-wide basis. We have identified three reportable segments: CoRe Banking, Mortgage Banking and Financial Holding Company. Transfers of Financial Assets Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when: (i) the assets have been isolated from us, (ii) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and (iii) we do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments provide optional expedients and exceptions for certain contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of rate reform. In December 2022, the FASB issued ASC 2022-06, Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848, which extends the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024. The guidance permits entities to not apply modification accounting or remeasure lease payments in lease contracts if the changes to the contract are related to the discontinuation of the reference rate. If certain criteria are met, the amendments also allow exceptions to the de-designation criteria of the hedging relationship and the assessment of hedge effectiveness during the transition period. In January 2021, ASU 2021-01 was issued by the FASB and clarifies that certain exceptions in reference rate reform apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. As of December 31, 2023, all loans and other relevant financial instruments that referenced LIBOR have been transitioned to the SOFR. In June 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. The amendments clarify that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security, and therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. The amendments also clarify that an entity cannot recognize and measure a contractual sale restriction as a separate unit of account and require additional disclosures related to equity securities with contractual sale restrictions. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. We do not currently expect these amendments to have a material impact our consolidated financial statements. In March 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-02, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structure Using the Proportional Amortization Method. The amendments allow registrants the option to apply the proportional amortization method to account for all types of investments in tax credit structures if certain conditions are met. Prior to these amendments, the option to use the proportional amortization method was limited to only investments in low-income-housing tax credit structures. Under the proportional amortization method, entities amortize the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received and recognize the net amortization and income tax credits and other benefits in the income statement as a component of income tax expense or benefit. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. We do not currently expect these amendments to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segments Disclosures. The amendments are intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the amendments clarify circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss and provide new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable segment. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our consolidated financial statements. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments require disaggregated information about a reporting entity's effect tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. Public business entities will be required to disclose additional information in specified categories with respect to the reconciliation of the effective tax rat to the statutory rate for federal, state, and foreign income taxes. The amendments also require greater detail about individual reconciling items in the rate reconciliation to the extent that the impact of those items exceeds a specified threshold. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our consolidated financial statements. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement In January 2023, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 326, ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates, ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses and ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures all of which clarify codification and correct unintended application of the guidance. Collectively, upon adoption, these updates comprise Accounting Standards Codification Topic 326 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASC 326"). The new guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with an expected credit loss methodology and requires consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an ACL. Purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans will receive an allowance account at the acquisition date that represents a component of the purchase price allocation. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will be recorded through an ACL, with such allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. We formed a cross-functional implementation team. This cross-functional team has completed testing the model and has executed the implementation plan, which included assessment and documentation of processes, internal controls and data sources; model testing and documentation; and system configuration, among other things. We completed the process of implementing a third-party vendor solution to assist us in the application of this standard. Adoption of this pronouncement resulted in an increase in the ACL as a result of changing from an “incurred loss” model, which encompasses allowances for current known and inherent losses within the portfolio, to an “expected loss” model, which encompasses allowances for losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio. In January 2023, we adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective method for loans, leases and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Adoption of this guidance resulted in a $10.0 million increase in the ACL, comprised of increases in the ACL for loans of $8.9 million and the ACL for unfunded commitments of $1.1 million, with $1.2 million of the increase reclassified from the amortized cost basis of PCD financial assets. This increase was offset by $2.1 million related to tax effect, resulting in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings of $6.6 million. Results for reporting periods beginning January 2023 are presented under ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with the incurred loss model. See Note 3 – Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses for further information. The ACL for the majority of the Bank's loans was calculated using a discounted cash flow methodology applied at a loan level with a one-year reasonable and supportable forecast period and a one-year straight-line reversion period. The Bank’s current ACL fluctuates over time due to macroeconomic conditions and forecasts as well as the size and composition of the loan portfolios. We adopted ASC 326 using the prospective transition approach for PCD assets that were previously classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”). In accordance with the pronouncement, management did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption. As mentioned above, the amortized cost basis of the PCD assets was adjusted to reflect the addition of $1.2 million to the ACL. The remaining noncredit discount (based on the adjusted amortized cost basis) is being accreted into interest income at a rate that approximates the effective interest rate beginning in January 2023. With regard to PCD assets, because we elected to disaggregate the former PCI pools and no longer consider these pools to be the unit of account, contractually delinquent PCD loans are now being reported as nonaccrual loans using the same criteria as other loans. In addition to the aforementioned elections, we made the following elections at adoption:
l | to not measure an ACL for accrued interest receivable and instead elected to reverse interest income on those loans that are 90 days past due;
l | to exclude accrued interest receivable from the amortized cost basis of financial instruments subject to ASC 326 and to separately state the balance of accrued interest receivable and other assets on the consolidated balance sheet;
l | as a practical expedient, elected to use the fair value of collateral when determining the ACL for loans if repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty (collateral-dependent loans); and
l | to update our troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") disclosures in accordance with ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, which eliminated the accounting guidance for TDRs for creditors.
In June 2023, we adopted ASU 2022-01, Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer Method, upon entering into an interest rate swap to hedge the fair value of fixed rate mortgages included in a closed portfolio for changes in the daily secured overnight financing rate ("SOFR") benchmark interest rate component of the mortgages. This ASU amends the guidance in ASU 2017-12 and expands what it now calls the portfolio layer method (previously the last-of-layer method) to allow entities to hedge multiple layers of a closed portfolio of assets. It also allows for the use of an amortizing notional swap when entering into a portfolio layer method hedge. Thus, an interest rate swap is considered a hedge of a single layer of the closed portfolio of fixed rate loans. We applied this ASU to the derivatives we entered into during 2023 as further described in Note 20 – Derivatives.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_AccountingPoliciesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 235 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//1943274/2147483426/235-10-50-1 Reference 2: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 235 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org//235/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_SignificantAccountingPoliciesTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration