XML 43 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2020

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

22. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value including a three-level valuation hierarchy, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date reflecting assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. The hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Observable prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities; prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; directly observable market inputs for substantially the full term of the asset and liability; market inputs that are not directly observable but are derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

We use fair value to measure certain assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, primarily securities available-for-sale. For assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value, the fair value measurement criteria may or may not be met during a reporting period and such measurements are therefore considered “nonrecurring” for purposes of disclosing our fair value measurements. Fair value is used on a nonrecurring basis to adjust carrying values for impaired loans and other real estate owned and also to record impairment on certain assets, such as goodwill, core deposit intangible, and other long-lived assets.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the hierarchy. In such cases, the lowest level of inputs that is significant to the measurement is used for to determine the hierarch for the entire asset or liability. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with our quarterly valuation process. There were no transfers between levels during 2020 or 2019.

The following assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated:


	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2020
U.S. Treasuries	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government Agencies		5,544		—		5,544		—
Municipal securities		16,687		—		16,687		—
Mortgage-backed securities		36,578		—		36,578		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations		27,695		—		27,695		—
SBA securities		7,667		—		7,667		—
Corporate bonds		21,419		—		21,419		—
Total	$	115,590	$	—	$	115,590	$	—


	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2019
U.S. Treasuries	$	999	$	999	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government Agencies		10,090		—		10,090		—
Municipal securities		18,291		—		18,291		—
Mortgage-backed securities		43,743		—		43,743		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations		28,605		—		28,605		—
SBA securities		9,486		—		9,486		—
Corporate bonds		8,675		—		8,675		—
Total	$	119,889	$	999	$	118,890	$	—

The following assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of the dates indicated:


	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2020
Performing impaired loans	$	798	$	—	$	—	$	798
Nonperforming impaired loans		8,421		—		—		8,421
OREO		429		—		—		429
Total	$	9,648	$	—	$	—	$	9,648

	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2019
Performing impaired loans	$	789	$	—	$	—	$	789
Nonperforming impaired loans		6,842		—		—		6,842
OREO		574		—		—		574
Total	$	8,205	$	—	$	—	$	8,205

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan may be considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise and liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value which uses substantially observable data, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value or the appraised value contains a significant assumption and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

The Company records OREO at fair value on a nonrecurring basis based on the collateral value of the property. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value which uses substantially observable data, the Company records the OREO as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value or the appraised value contains a significant assumption, and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Management also incorporates assumptions regarding market trends or other relevant factors and selling and commission costs ranging from 5% to 7%. Such adjustments and assumptions are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.