Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

13. Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company uses a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and unobservable inputs:

•

Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

•

Level 3 — Valuation is based upon unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement.

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2014 and 2013, according to the valuation techniques the Company used to determine their fair values.

	March 31, 2014											March 31, 2013
			Fair Value Measurements												Fair Value Measurements
			Using Inputs Considered as												Using Inputs Considered as
	Fair Value		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Fair Value			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Short-term investments
Mutual funds	$	521,000		$	521,000			-			-		$	411,000		$	411,000			-			-
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts		-			-			-			-			683,000			-		$	683,000			-

Liabilities
Other current liabilities
Deferred compensation		521,000			521,000			-			-			411,000			411,000			-			-
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts		159,000			-		$	159,000			-			-			-			-			-
Other liabilities
Warrant liability		10,047,000			-			-		$	10,047,000			2,014,000			-			-		$	2,014,000

The Company’s short-term investments, which fund its deferred compensation liabilities, consist of investments in mutual funds. These investments are classified as Level 1 as the shares of these mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable the Company to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.

The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers and classified as Level 2. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, a loss of $842,000 and a gain of $804,000, respectively, were recorded in general and administrative expenses due to the change in the value of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts subsequent to entering into the contracts.

The Company estimates the fair value of the warrant liability using level 3 inputs and the Monte Carlo simulation model at each balance sheet date. Monte Carlo simulation model requires the input of subjective assumptions including the expected volatility of the underlying stock. These subjective assumptions are based on both historical and other information. Changes in the values assumed and used in the model can materially affect the estimate of fair value. This amount is recorded as a warrant liability which is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2014 and 2013. Any subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrant liability will be recorded in current period earnings as a general and administrative expense. During the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, a loss of $10,443,000 and $389,000 was recorded in general and administrative expenses due to the change in the fair value of the warrant liability.

The assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Supplier Warrant recorded as warrant liability were:

	March 31, 2014

Risk free interest rate		1.11	%
Expected life in years		3.50
Expected volatility		45.90	%
Dividend yield		-
Probability of future financing		0	%

The risk free interest rate used was based on U.S. treasury-note yields with terms commensurate with the remaining term of the warrants. The expected life is based on the remaining contractual term of the warrants and the expected volatility is based on the Company’s daily historical volatility over a period commensurate with the remaining term of the warrants.

A summary of the change to the Company’s warrant liability, as measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is presented below:

	Years Ended March 31,
	2014			2013

Beginning balance	$	2,014,000		$	-
Newly issued		-			1,625,000
Total (gain) loss included in net loss		10,443,000			389,000
Exercises/settlements (1)		(2,410,000	)		-
Net transfers in (out) of Level 3		-			-
Ending balance	$	10,047,000		$	2,014,000

(1)	Represents the fair value of the Cerberus Warrant as of the settlement date (see Note 10).

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 the Company had no significant measurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details