XML 30 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.2

Commitments and Contingencies | 6 Months Ended
--- | ---
Jun. 30, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings and Government Investigations The Company is periodically involved in lawsuits, investigations and claims. While uncertainties exist with respect to the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against it, the Company, based on currently available information, does not believe that any currently pending or threatened legal proceeding to which the Company is a party, or is likely to become a party, including those proceedings identified in this Note 13, will have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. The costs incurred by the Company to defend lawsuits, investigations and claims and amounts the Company pays to other parties because of these matters may be covered by insurance in some circumstances. Litigation and Commercial Claims The Company and a subsidiary of the Company, Mistras Arizona Inspection Services LLC (“Mistras Arizona”), are subject to a lawsuit filed by the State of Arizona and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (collectively “DEQ”). The lawsuit, captioned State of Arizona v. Mistras Group, Inc., Mistras Arizona Inspection Services, LLC and Naiman Phoenix, Ltd., was originally filed on February 27, 2024, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona for Maricopa County, CV 2024-003866 (the "DEQ Complaint"). The DEQ Complaint alleges various violations of Arizona environmental laws and regulations by the Company and Mistras Arizona in connection with the operation by Mistras Arizona of its testing facility in Phoenix, Arizona. The DEQ Complaint seeks, through injunctive relief, the closing of a chromic acid plating line at the testing facility, implementation of a site assessment plan approved by the DEQ, and corrective and remedial action to bring the testing facility into compliance with laws and regulations. In addition, the DEQ Complaint seeks unspecified penalties and costs. The Superior Court held a hearing September 2024 regarding the DEQ’s request for a preliminary injunction. On October 23, 2024, the Superior Court issued a ruling, which declined to issue the preliminary injunction requested by the DEQ, but imposed the following conditions on the Company and Mistras Arizona unless and until modified by the Superior Court or entry of a final judgement: (1) the Company and Mistras Arizona are prohibited from releasing or permitting any release of chromic acid from the facility; (2) within a reasonable time, the Company and Mistras Arizona must complete improvements to the testing facility designed to prevent future discharges of chromium or chromic acid; (3) the Company must notify the DEQ upon completion of the improvement to enable the DEQ to conduct an inspection; and (4) the Company and Mistras Arizona are prohibited from engaging in any chrome plating operations at the testing facility until they notify the DEQ that the improvements have been completed. The DEQ may seek relief if it determines that the improvements are not sufficient to prevent discharges. In April 2025, Mistras Arizona notified the DEQ of its completed improvements, and the DEQ inspected the improvements. Following the DEQ site visit, Mistras Arizona commenced its chrome plating operations on April 28, 2025. The Company intends to continue complying with the Superior Court's ruling. This matter is still in the relatively early stages, including as to factual and expert discovery. It is probable that remediation costs, fines and penalties may be imposed related to this lawsuit. However, the Company is unable to estimate the range of loss that it may incur. In addition, Mistras Arizona’s operations in Phoenix are located at a leased site within the footprint of the Motorola 52nd Street Superfund Site (the “Motorola Site”). Mistras Arizona received a General Notice Letter from the US Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), dated May 21, 2024, informing Mistras Arizona that the EPA has identified it as a potentially responsible party in relation to the Motorola Site. On April 29, 2025, the Company received a notice from the EPA requesting information regarding the improvements and other matters related to Phoenix testing facility. Mistras Arizona provided the EPA with the requested information in July 2025. As it relates to this lawsuit, the recorded probable losses remain an estimate, and actual costs arising from this matter could materially differ depending on the actual costs incurred as well as the availability of additional insurance coverage. Pension Related Contingencies Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries had significant reductions in their unionized workers in 2018. The collective bargaining agreements for the employees of these subsidiaries required contributions for these employees to two national multi-employer pension funds. The reduction in employees resulted in one of the Company's subsidiaries incurring a complete withdrawal to one of the pension funds under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), which was fully satisfied in 2019. The Company has determined that the subsidiary is likely to incur partial or complete withdrawal liability to the other pension fund. The balance of the estimated total amount of this potential liability as of June 30, 2025 is approximately $2.5 million, which were incurred in 2018 and 2019.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 405 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/405-30/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/450/tableOfContent Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478522/954-440-50-1 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 6: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/440/tableOfContent + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration