CONTINGENCIES	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2025
CONTINGENCIES
CONTINGENCIES	10. CONTINGENCIES Class Action Litigation On March 27, 2024, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas by investors in a purported Ponzi scheme operated by two individuals, one of whom maintained accounts at C&N Bank. The plaintiffs have sued C&N Bank, along with another bank, and additional law firm and accounting firm defendants. The case is styled Goldovsky, et al. v. Rauld, et al. Plaintiffs asserted claims against C&N Bank and the other bank for aiding and abetting alleged violations of the Texas Securities Act, and additional claims against the legal and accounting professionals for statutory fraud, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and knowing participation in breach of fiduciary duty. C&N Bank filed motions to dismiss the Texas case for wont of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The Plaintiffs responded to those motions. By order of the District Court judge dated March 27, 2025, C&N Bank’s motion to dismiss for wont of personal jurisdiction was granted. Plaintiffs filed an application for certification of the Texas suit as a class action. On October 16, 2025, the District Court in Texas issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On May 23, 2025, C&N Bank was served with a complaint filed by Goldovsky, et al in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The complaint is predicated upon Texas securities law, alleging substantially the same facts and asserting the same legal arguments as in the Texas case. C&N Bank filed motions to dismiss the Pennsylvania case. Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify the case as class action. C&N Bank filed its response brief in opposition to class certification in the Pennsylvania case on October 22, 2025. C&N Bank believes that it has substantial defenses against the action, and it intends to defend itself against the plaintiffs’ allegations. Based on the information available to the Corporation, the Corporation does not believe at this time that a loss is probable in this matter, nor can a range of possible losses be determined. Accordingly, no liability has been recorded for this litigation matter in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Corporation’s estimate may change from time to time, and actual losses could vary. Other Matters In the normal course of business, the Corporation is subject to pending and threatened litigation in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. In management’s opinion, the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations would not be materially affected by the outcome of these legal proceedings.

CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2025

10. CONTINGENCIES

Class Action Litigation

On March 27, 2024, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas by investors in a purported Ponzi scheme operated by two individuals, one of whom maintained accounts at C&N Bank. The plaintiffs have sued C&N Bank, along with another bank, and additional law firm and accounting firm defendants. The case is styled Goldovsky, et al. v. Rauld, et al. Plaintiffs asserted claims against C&N Bank and the other bank for aiding and abetting alleged violations of the Texas Securities Act, and additional claims against the legal and accounting professionals for statutory fraud, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and knowing participation in breach of fiduciary duty.

C&N Bank filed motions to dismiss the Texas case for wont of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The Plaintiffs responded to those motions. By order of the District Court judge dated March 27, 2025, C&N Bank’s motion to dismiss for wont of personal jurisdiction was granted.

Plaintiffs filed an application for certification of the Texas suit as a class action. On October 16, 2025, the District Court in Texas issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.

On May 23, 2025, C&N Bank was served with a complaint filed by Goldovsky, et al in the US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The complaint is predicated upon Texas securities law, alleging substantially the same facts and asserting the same legal arguments as in the Texas case. C&N Bank filed motions to dismiss the Pennsylvania case. Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify the case as class action. C&N Bank filed its response brief in opposition to class certification in the Pennsylvania case on October 22, 2025.

C&N Bank believes that it has substantial defenses against the action, and it intends to defend itself against the plaintiffs’ allegations. Based on the information available to the Corporation, the Corporation does not believe at this time that a loss is probable in this matter, nor can a range of possible losses be determined. Accordingly, no liability has been recorded for this litigation matter in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Corporation’s estimate may change from time to time, and actual losses could vary.

Other Matters

In the normal course of business, the Corporation is subject to pending and threatened litigation in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. In management’s opinion, the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations would not be materially affected by the outcome of these legal proceedings.