XML 35 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.19.1

Investments | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2019
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract] |
Investments | In August 2007 and December 2008, the Company made an aggregate investment of $7.5 million in kaléo, a privately held specialty pharmaceutical company dedicated to building innovative solutions for serious and life-threatening medical conditions. Tredegar owns Series A-3 Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in kaléo that, taken together, represents on a fully-diluted basis an approximate 20% interest in kaléo. Tredegar accounts for its investment in kaléo under the fair value option. At the time of the initial investment, the Company elected the fair value option of accounting since its investment objectives were similar to those of venture capitalists, which typically do not have controlling financial interests. The estimated fair value of the Company’s investment was $101.7 million as of March 31, 2019 and $84.6 million as of December 31, 2018. The fair value estimate at March 31, 2019 includes a receivable of $17.6 million for a cash dividend declared by kaléo on March 29, 2019 and paid on April 30, 2019 (“kaléo dividend”). This is the first dividend that the Company has received on its investment in kaléo. Future dividends are subject to the discretion of kaléo’s board of directors. The Company recognized a gain on its investment in kaléo of $17.1 million ($14.3 million after taxes), which includes the kaléo dividend, in the first quarter of 2019. Gains or losses associated with the Company’s investment in kaléo are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income and separately stated in the segment operating profit table in Note 10. Kaléo transitioned from a company with net losses in 2017 to a company with net income in 2018. Tredegar’s assessment of kaléo’s risk profile has improved during this transition resulting in a lower discount rate versus a year ago that is applied to kaléo’s projected unlevered after-tax cash flows to estimate kaléo’s enterprise value (“EV”) (the “DCF Method”) and the Company’s underlying share of kaléo’s equity value. Moreover, with net income as well as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), the EV of kaléo can also be estimated by applying the EV-to-adjusted EBITDA multiple of guideline public companies to kaléo’s most recent trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA (the “EBITDA Multiple Method”). The Company estimates the fair value of its investment in kaléo by: (i) computing the weighted average estimated EV utilizing both the DCF Method and EBITDA Multiple Method (including adjustments for any surplus or deficient working capital and estimates of contingent liabilities), (ii) adding cash and cash equivalents, (iii) subtracting interest-bearing debt, (iv) subtracting a private company liquidity discount estimated at 15% of the net result of (i) through (iii) and (v) applying liquidation preferences and fully diluted ownership percentages to the estimated equity value computed in (i) through (iv). The Company’s estimate of kaléo’s EV as of March 31, 2019 was determined by weighting the EBITDA Multiple Method by 80% and the DCF Method by 20%, which was consistent with the weighting applied at December 31, 2018. The heavier weighting towards the EBITDA Multiple Method was due to its heuristic nature and kaléo’s transition and actual performance in 2018, versus the hypothetical nature of the projections used in the DCF Method. The DCF Method projections rely on numerous assumptions and Level 3 inputs, including estimating market growth, market share, pricing, net margins (after allowances for temporary discounts, prompt pay discounts, product returns, wholesaler fees, chargebacks, rebates and copays), selling expenses, R&D expenses, general and administrative expenses, income taxes on unlevered pretax income, working capital, capital expenditures and the risk-adjusted discount rate. In addition, there are various regulatory and legal enforcement efforts, including an ongoing Department of Justice investigation related to kaléo’s Evzio business, which could have a material adverse effect on kaléo’s business that require assessment in any valuation method applied. The table below provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair value at March 31, 2019, of the Company’s investment in kaléo (including the kaléo dividend receivable) for changes in the EBITDA multiple used in applying the EBITDA Multiple Method and the changes in the weighting of the DCF Method.
($ Millions) |  | EV-to-Adjusted EBITDA Multiple
|  | 6.4 x |  | 7.4 x |  | 8.4 x |  | 9.4 x |  | 10.4 x |
Weighting to DCF Method | 50 | % | $ | 90.9 |  | $ | 97.9 |  | $ | 105.0 |  | $ | 112.1 |  | $ | 119.1 |
40 | % | $ | 86.9 |  | $ | 95.4 |  | $ | 103.9 |  | $ | 112.4 |  | $ | 120.8 |
30 | % | $ | 83.0 |  | $ | 92.9 |  | $ | 102.8 |  | $ | 112.7 |  | $ | 122.5 |
20 | % | $ | 79.1 |  | $ | 90.4 |  | $ | 101.7 |  | $ | 113.0 |  | $ | 124.3 |
10 | % | $ | 75.1 |  | $ | 87.9 |  | $ | 100.6 |  | $ | 113.3 |  | $ | 126.0 |
— | % | $ | 71.2 |  | $ | 85.3 |  | $ | 99.5 |  | $ | 113.6 |  | $ | 127.7 |
The ultimate value of the Company’s ownership interest in kaléo will be determined and realized only if and when a liquidity event occurs, and the ultimate value could be materially different from the $101.7 million estimated fair value reflected in the Company’s financial statements at March 31, 2019.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_EquityMethodInvestmentsAndJointVenturesAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for investments and other noncurrent assets. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_InvestmentsAndOtherNoncurrentAssetsTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration