XML 42 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Basis of Accounting
 
The accounts are maintained and the consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is owned. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience, forecasted future events and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions may vary under different assumptions or conditions. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. We believe the accounting policies below are critical in the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains deposits in several financial institutions, which may at times exceed amounts covered by insurance provided by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC").  The Company has not experienced any losses related to amounts in excess of FDIC limits.
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Accounts and Notes Receivable
 
Trade accounts receivable for the nightclub operation is primarily comprised of credit card charges, which are generally converted to cash in two to five days after a purchase is made.  The media division’s accounts receivable is primarily comprised of receivables for advertising sales and Expo registration. The Company’s accounts receivable, other is comprised of employee advances and other miscellaneous receivables. The long-term portion of notes receivable are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognizes interest income on notes receivable based on the terms of the agreement and based upon management’s evaluation that the notes receivable and interest income will be collected. The Company recognizes allowances for doubtful accounts or notes when, based on management judgment, circumstances indicate that accounts or notes receivable will not be collected.
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Inventories
 
Inventories include alcoholic beverages, energy drinks, food, and Company merchandise. Inventories are carried at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis), or market.
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Provisions for depreciation and amortization are made using straight-line rates over the estimated useful lives of the related assets and the shorter of useful lives or terms of the applicable leases for leasehold improvements. Buildings have estimated useful lives ranging from 29 to 40 years. Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements have estimated useful lives between five and 40 years. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives are capitalized. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The cost of assets sold or abandoned and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gains or losses are charged or credited in the accompanying consolidated statement of income of the respective period.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but reviewed on an annual basis for impairment. Definite lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives.  Fully amortized assets are written-off against accumulated amortization.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
In accordance with US GAAP, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.
 
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.
 
For goodwill, the impairment determination is made at the reporting unit level. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. The Company’s annual evaluation for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets was performed as of September 30, 2015. The Company recognized intangible asset impairments in the year ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 related to specific reporting units. See Note O, Impairment of Assets.  The Company did not recognize impairment for the year ended September 30, 2013. All of the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets relate to the nightclubs, except for $567,000 related to the acquisition of the media division and $9.8 million in the energy drink business. Definite lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives. Fully amortized assets are written-off against accumulated amortization.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company calculates the fair value of its assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes to consolidated financial statements when the fair value is different than the carrying value of these financial instruments. The estimated fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of notes receivable and short and long-term debt also approximates fair value since these instruments bear market rates of interest. None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Comprehensive Income
 
The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 220, Reporting Comprehensive Income . Comprehensive income is the total of (1) net income plus (2) all other changes in net assets arising from non-owner sources, which are referred to as items of other comprehensive income. An analysis of changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income is presented in the statement of comprehensive income.
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of alcoholic beverages, food and merchandise, other revenues and services at the point-of-sale upon receipt of cash, check, or credit card charge.
 
Revenues from the sale of magazines and advertising content are recognized when the issue is published and shipped.  Revenues and external expenses related to the Company’s annual Expo convention are recognized upon the completion of the convention.
Sales And Liquor Taxes Policy [Policy Text Block]
Sales and Liquor Taxes
 
The Company recognizes sales and liquor taxes paid as revenues and an equal amount in taxes and permits expense in accordance with FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.  Total sales and liquor taxes aggregated $11.3 million, $10.3 million and $8.5 million for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Advertising and Marketing
 
Advertising and marketing expenses are primarily comprised of costs related to public advertisements and giveaways, which are used for promotional purposes. Advertising and marketing expenses are expensed as incurred and are included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of Income.
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Income Taxes
 
Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In addition, a valuation allowance is established to reduce any deferred tax asset for which it is determined that it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
 
US GAAP creates a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. There are no unrecognized tax benefits to disclose in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Equity Method Investments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Accounting for Investments
 
Investments in companies in which the company has a 20% to 50% interest are accounted for using the equity method and carried at cost and are adjusted for the Company's proportionate share of their undistributed earnings or losses. Investments in Companies in which the Company owns less than a 20% interest are accounted for at cost and reviewed for any impairment.  The 40% investment in one company at September 30, 2012 was recorded in other assets and was a nominal amount. The  40% was sold during the year ended September 30, 2013. During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company also acquired a 50% investment in a nightclub for $ 600,000, which was not yet open at September 30, 2012. This investment was also recorded in other assets at September 30, 2012. During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired the remaining 50% of this operation and became consolidated – see Note M, Acquisitions. This company was sold during the year ended September 30, 2015. Also during the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired approximately 12% of another entity for $600,000. This investment was increased to 15% during the year ended September 30, 2014 and to 51% in October 2014, at which time the subsidiary became part of the consolidated group (see Note M, Acquisitions).
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Earnings Per Common Share
 
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company. Potential common stock shares consist of shares that may arise from outstanding dilutive common stock options and warrants (the number of which is computed using the “treasury stock method”) and from outstanding convertible debentures (the number of which is computed using the “if converted method”). Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) considers the potential dilution that could occur if the Company’s outstanding common stock options, warrants and convertible debentures were converted into common stock that then shared in the Company’s earnings (loss) (as adjusted for interest expense, that would no longer occur if the debentures were converted).
 
Net earnings applicable to common stock and the weighted average number of shares used for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computations are summarized in the table that follows:
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
FOR THE  YEAR ENDED
 
 
 
SEPTEMBER 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to RCIHH shareholders
 
$
9,312
 
$
11,240
 
$
9,191
 
Average number of common shares outstanding
 
 
10,359
 
 
9,816
 
 
9,518
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share
 
$
0.90
 
$
1.15
 
$
0.97
 
Diluted earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to RCIHH shareholders
 
$
9,312
 
$
11,240
 
$
9,191
 
Adjustment to net earnings from assumed conversion of debentures (1)
 
 
29
 
 
821
 
 
57
 
Adjusted net income attributable to RCIHH shareholders
 
 
9,341
 
 
12,061
 
 
9,248
 
Average number of common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common shares outstanding
 
 
10,359
 
 
9,816
 
 
9,518
 
Potential dilutive shares resulting from exercise of warrants and options (2)
 
 
-
 
 
9
 
 
4
 
Potential dilutive shares resulting from conversion of debentures (1)
 
 
47
 
 
812
 
 
93
 
Total average number of common shares outstanding used for dilution
 
 
10,406
 
 
10,637
 
 
9,615
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Rick's shareholders
 
$
0.90
 
$
1.13
 
$
0.96
 
 
*EPS may not foot due to rounding.
Additional shares for options, warrants and debentures amounting to 353,400, 234,189 and  821,440 for the year ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were not considered since they would be antidilutive.
 
(1)  Represents interest expense on dilutive convertible securities that would not occur if they were assumed converted.
(2)  All outstanding warrants and options were considered for the EPS computation.
 
Convertible debentures (principal and accrued interest) outstanding at September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 totaling $4,554,703, $9,276,733 and $7,789,818, respectively, were convertible into common stock at prices ranging from $10.00 to $12.50 in each year. Convertible debentures amounting to $483,953, $9,276,733 and $1,455,075 were dilutive in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]
Stock Options
 
At September 30, 2015, the Company has no stock options outstanding.   The Company recognizes all employee stock-based compensation as a cost in the consolidated financial statements. Equity-classified awards are measured at the grant date fair value of the award. The Company estimates grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The critical estimates are volatility, expected life and risk-free rate. The compensation cost recognized for the year ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was zero, $159,370 and $847,183, respectively. There were 10,000, 369,665 and zero stock option exercises for the years ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Fair Value Accounting
 
The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels.
 
US GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
 
 
Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
Level 2 – Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
 
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
 
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
 
We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale, which are reported at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related income tax effect, if any, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from income and are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses from securities classified as available for-sale are included in comprehensive income. We measure the fair value of our marketable securities based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets, or Level 1 inputs. As of September 30, 2015, available-for-sale securities consisted of the following:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Cost
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Available for Sale
 
Basis
 
Gains
 
Value
 
Tax-Advantaged Bond Fund
 
$
505
 
$
109
 
$
614
 
 
In accordance with US GAAP, we review our marketable securities to determine whether a decline in fair value of a security below the cost basis is other than temporary. Should the decline be considered other than temporary, we write down the cost basis of the security and include the loss in current earnings as opposed to an unrealized holding loss. No losses for other than temporary impairments in our marketable securities portfolio were recognized during the year ended September 30, 2015.
 
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
 
(in thousands)
 
Carrying
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2015
 
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Marketable securities
 
$
614
 
$
614
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Carrying
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2014
 
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Marketable securities
 
$
596
 
$
596
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
Fair Value Assets And Liabilities Measured On Nonrecurring Basis [Policy Text Block]
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis relate primarily to tangible fixed assets, goodwill and othe intangible assets, which are remeasured when the derived fair value is below carrying value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these assets, the Company does not periodically adjust carrying value to fair value except in the event of impairment. If it is determined that impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to fair value and the difference is recorded within income before interest, othe income (expense) and income taxes in the consolidated statement of income.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
(in thousands)
 
September 30
 
Identical Asset
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
Description
 
2015
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Goodwill
 
$
52,641
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
52,641
 
Property and equipment, net
 
 
134,150
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
134,150
 
Indefinite lived intangibles
 
 
55,828
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
55,828
 
Definite lived intangibles, net
 
 
5,169
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
5,169
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value at Reporting Date Using
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
 
 
 
Significant
 
 
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Significant Other
 
Unobservable
 
(in thousands)
 
September 30
 
Identical Asset
 
Observable Inputs
 
Inputs
 
Description
 
2014
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
 
Goodwill
 
$
43,374
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
43,374
 
Property and equipment, net
 
 
113,962
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
113,962
 
Indefinite lived intangibles
 
 
53,968
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
53,968
 
Definite lived intangibles, net
 
 
675
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
675
 
 
 
 
Total Gains (Losses)
 
(in thousands)
 
Years Ended September 30,
 
Description
 
2015
 
2014
 
2013
 
Goodwill
 
$
-
 
$
(613)
 
$
-
 
Property and equipment, net
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
Indefinite lived intangibles
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
Definite lived intangibles, net
 
 
(1,654)
 
 
(1,263)
 
 
-
 
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
 
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which it will adopt the standard in fiscal year 2018.
 
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The purpose of this ASU is to incorporate into U.S. GAAP management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable), and to provide related footnote disclosures. This update is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU clarifies that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU may be applied either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which amends FASB ASU Subtopic 835-30, Interest - Imputation of Interest. The new standard requires that all costs incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the debt. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2015 and is required to be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects that the adoption of this new guidance will result in a reclassification of debt issuance costs on its consolidated balance sheets.
 
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. This ASU is part of the FASB’s initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items, which were previously required to be segregated from the results of ordinary operations and shown separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. Entities were also required to disclose applicable income taxes for the extraordinary item and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. Items which are considered both unusual and infrequent will now be presented separately within income from continuing operations in the income statement or disclosed in notes to the financial statements. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Companies may apply the ASU prospectively, or may also apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, which amends FASB ASU Topic 810, Consolidations. This ASU amends the current consolidation guidance, including introducing a separate consolidation analysis specific to limited partnerships and other similar entities. This ASU requires that limited partnerships and similar legal entities provide partners with either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the general partner in order to be considered a voting interest entity. The specialized consolidation model and guidance for limited partnerships and similar legal entities have been eliminated. There is no longer a presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. For limited partnerships and similar legal entities that qualify as voting interest entities, a limited partner with a controlling financial interest should consolidate a limited partnership. A controlling financial interest may be achieved through holding a limited partner interest that provides substantive kick-out rights. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating the standard, but does not, at this time, anticipate a material impact to the financial statements and footnote disclosures once implemented.
 
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. This ASU does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the requirement to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market under the previous requirement could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. Entities within scope of this update will now be required to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory using LIFO or the retail inventory method. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. The ASU requires an acquirer to recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Acquirers must recognize, in the same reporting period, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The ASU requires entities to classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.