C – Finance Receivables, Net

The Company originates installment sale contracts from the sale of used vehicles at its dealerships. These installment sale contracts typically include interest rates ranging from 14% to 15% per annum, are collateralized by the vehicle sold and typically provide for payments over periods ranging from 18 to 42 months. The weighted average interest rate for the portfolio was approximately 14.9% at July 31, 2015. The Company’s finance receivables are defined as one segment and one class of loans, which is sub-prime consumer automobile contracts. The level of risks inherent in the Company’s financing receivables is managed as one homogeneous pool. The components of finance receivables are as follows:

(In thousands)	July 31, 2015			April 30, 2015
Gross contract amount	$	489,646		$	477,305
Less unearned finance charges		(61,765	)		(59,937	)
Principal balance		427,881			417,368
Less allowance for credit losses		(95,582	)		(93,224	)

Finance receivables, net	$	332,299		$	324,144

Changes in the finance receivables, net are as follows:

	Three Months Ended July 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	324,144		$	293,299
Finance receivable originations		117,341			107,957
Finance receivable collections		(58,943	)		(54,317	)
Provision for credit losses		(35,345	)		(27,876	)
Losses on claims for payment protection plan		(3,155	)		(2,186	)
Inventory acquired in repossession and payment protection plan claims		(11,743	)		(10,086	)
Balance at end of period	$	332,299		$	306,791

Changes in the finance receivables allowance for credit losses are as follows:

	Three Months Ended July 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	93,224		$	86,033
Provision for credit losses		35,345			27,876
Charge-offs, net of recovered collateral		(32,987	)		(24,383	)
Balance at end of period	$	95,582		$	89,526

The factors which influenced management’s judgment in determining the amount of the additions to the allowance charged to provision for credit losses are described below:

The level of actual charge-offs, net of recovered collateral, is the most important factor in determining the charges to the provision for credit losses. This is due to the fact that once a contract becomes delinquent the account is either made current by the customer, the vehicle is repossessed or the account is written off if the collateral cannot be recovered. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables increased to 7.8% for the three months ended July 31, 2015 compared to 6.3% for the same period in the prior year. The increase in net charge-offs for the first three months of fiscal 2016 resulted from an increased frequency of losses as well as an increase in the severity of losses resulting from lower wholesale values at repossession.

Collections and delinquency levels can have a significant effect on additions to the allowance and are reviewed frequently. Collections as a percentage of average finance receivables were 14.0% for the three months ended July 31, 2015 compared to 14.1% for the prior year period. The decrease in collections as a percentage of average finance receivables primarily resulted from the longer average term and slightly higher contract modifications offset by lower delinquencies and a higher level of early pay-offs. Delinquencies greater than 30 days were 3.8% for July 31, 2015 and 4.7% at July 31, 2014.

Macro-economic factors, the competitive environment, and more importantly, proper execution of operational policies and procedures can have a significant effect on additions to the allowance charged to the provision. Unemployment levels, gasoline prices and prices for staple items can potentially have a significant effect on collections and delinquency levels, and ultimately on net charge-offs. We believe our customers continue to be under significant pressure due to the persistent difficult macro-economic environment for the Company’s customer base. We expect these conditions to continue in the near to mid-term future. The Company continues to focus on operational improvements within the collections area such as credit reporting for customers and implementation of GPS technology on vehicles sold.

Credit quality information for finance receivables is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	July 31, 2015					April 30, 2015					July 31, 2014
	Principal Balance		Percent of Portfolio			Principal Balance		Percent of Portfolio			Principal Balance		Percent of Portfolio
Current	$	355,263		83.03	%	$	329,329		78.91	%	$	314,969		79.48	%
3 - 29 days past due		56,247		13.15	%		64,004		15.33	%		62,700		15.82	%
30 - 60 days past due		12,030		2.81	%		12,777		3.06	%		12,853		3.24	%
61 - 90 days past due		2,955		0.69	%		8,463		2.03	%		4,058		1.02	%
> 90 days past due		1,386		0.32	%		2,795		0.67	%		1,737		0.44	%
Total	$	427,881		100.00	%	$	417,368		100.00	%	$	396,317		100.00	%

Accounts one and two days past due are considered current for this analysis, due to the varying payment dates and variation in the day of the week at each period end. Delinquencies may vary from period to period based on the average age of the portfolio, seasonality within the calendar year, the day of the week and overall economic factors. The above categories are consistent with internal operational measures used by the Company to monitor credit results.

Substantially all of the Company’s automobile contracts involve contracts made to individuals with impaired or limited credit histories, or higher debt-to-income ratios than permitted by traditional lenders. Contracts made with buyers who are restricted in their ability to obtain financing from traditional lenders generally entail a higher risk of delinquency, default and repossession, and higher losses than contracts made with buyers with better credit. The Company monitors contract term length, down payment percentages, and collections for credit quality indicators.

	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2015			2014

Principal collected as a percent of average finance receivables		14.0	%		14.1	%
Average down-payment percentage		6.6	%		6.9	%
Average originating contract term (in months )		28.2			27.2

		July 31, 2015				July 31, 2014
Portfolio weighted average contract term, including modifications (in months )			30.4				29.6

The decrease in the principal collected as a percent of average finance receivables was primarily due to the longer average term and slightly higher contract modifications offset by lower delinquencies and a higher level of early pay-offs. The increases in the portfolio weighted average contract term are primarily related to efforts to keep payments affordable, for competitive reasons and to continue to work more with our customers when they experience financial difficulties. In order to remain competitive, term lengths may continue to increase.