XML 30 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.6.0.2

Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2016
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] |
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements | ﻿ 9. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements ﻿ Financial Instruments ﻿ A financial instrument is cash or a contract that imposes an obligation to deliver, or conveys a right to receive cash or another financial instrument. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered to be representative of fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. ﻿ Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ﻿ On December 31, 2016, the Company had open foreign currency forward contracts which are used solely for hedging and not for speculative purposes. Management believes that its use of these instruments to reduce risk is in the Company’s best interest. The counterparties to these financial instruments are financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings. ﻿ Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk ﻿ The Company conducts business internationally and therefore is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company uses derivative financial instruments as cash flow and fair value hedges to manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by reducing the effect of such fluctuations on foreign currency denominated intercompany transactions, inventory purchases and other foreign currency exposures. The currencies hedged by the Company during 2016, 2015 and 2014 include the euro and Mexican peso. In addition, the Company hedged the U.S. dollar against the Swedish krona and euro on behalf of its European subsidiaries in 2016, 2015, and 2014. ﻿ These forward contracts were executed to hedge forecasted transactions and were accounted for as cash flow hedges. As such, the effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss was deferred and reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. The cash flow hedges were highly effective. The effectiveness of the transactions has been and will be measured on an ongoing basis using regression analysis and forecasted future purchases of the currency. ﻿ In certain instances, the foreign currency forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting or are not designated as hedges, and therefore are marked to market with gains and losses recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as a component of other expense (income), net. ﻿ The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are designed to offset some of the gains and losses realized on the underlying foreign currency denominated transactions as follows: ﻿ Euro-denominated Foreign Currency Forward Contracts ﻿ At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held a foreign currency forward contract with an underlying notional amount of $1,601 and $1,647, respectively, to reduce the exposure related to the Company’s euro-denominated intercomp any loans. This contract expired in January 2017. The euro-denominated foreign currency forward contract was not designated as a hedging instrument. For the year s ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company recognized a gain of $57, $336 and $1,205, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations as a component of other expense, net related to the euro-denominated contract. ﻿ U.S. dollar-denominated Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – Cash Flow Hedge ﻿ The Company entered into on behalf of one of its European Electronics subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Swedish krona, U.S. dollar-denominated currency contracts with a notional amount at December 31, 201 5 of $10,007 which expire d ratably on a monthly basis from January 2016 through December 2016. There were no contracts entered into as of December 31, 2016. ﻿ The Company entered into on behalf of one of its European Electronics subsidiaries whose functional currency is the euro, U.S. dollar-denominated currency contracts with a notional amount at December 31, 201 5 of $2,421 which expire d ratably on a monthly basis from January 2016 through December 2016. There were no contracts entered into as of December 31, 2016. ﻿ The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the U.S. dollar-denominated foreign currency forward contracts held as of December 31, 2015 and during 2016 and concluded that the hedges were effective. ﻿ Mexican peso-denominated Foreign Currency Forward Contracts – Cash Flow Hedge ﻿ The Company holds Mexican peso-denominated foreign currency contracts with notional amounts at December 31, 2016 of $5,699 which expire ratably on a monthly basis from January 201 7 through December 2017, compared to $9,780 at December 31, 2015. ﻿ The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the Mexican peso-denominated foreign currency forward contracts held as of June 30, 2014. As a result of the sale of the Wiring business, the Company forecasted that it would purchase Mexican pesos to fulfill only two of the five hedge contracts for the period October 2014 through December 2014. As the purchase of Mexican pesos related to three of the five hedge contracts was not probable, these three contracts attributed to the Wiring business were de-designated as of June 30, 2014, and the associated unrecognized $320 gain at that date was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and recorded in discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the quarter and year of de-designation. On August 4, 2014, the three de-designated hedges were terminated and settled resulting in a nominal gain. ﻿ The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the Mexican peso-denominated foreign currency forward contracts held as of December 31, 201 6 and 2015, and the years then ended, and concluded that the hedges were effective. ﻿ Commodity Price Risk - Cash Flow Hedge ﻿ To mitigate the risk of future price volatility and, consequently, fluctuations in gross margins, the Company entered into fixed price commodity contracts with a financial institution to fix the cost of a portion of the Company’s copper purchases. Copper is a raw material used in a number of the Company’s products. ﻿ The Company did not have any fixed price commodity contracts at December 31, 201 6 and 201 5 compared to an aggregate notional amount of 317 pounds at December 31, 2014. ﻿ The unrealized gain or loss for the effective portion of the hedges were deferred and reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss while the ineffective portion, if any, was reported in the consolidated statements of operations. The effectiveness of the transactions is measured on an ongoing basis using regression analysis and forecasted future copper purchases. ﻿ The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the copper fixed price commodity contracts as of June 30, 2014. As a result of the sale of the Wiring business, the Company forecasted that it would not purchase the quantities of copper to fulfill the two contracts for the period August 2014 through March 2015. As the purchase of copper quantities related to these contracts was not probable, the contracts primarily associated with the Wiring segment not expected to be fulfilled were de-designated at June 30, 2014, and the associated unrecognized $77 gain at that date was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and recorded in discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the quarter and year of de-designation. ﻿ Interest Rate Risk - Fair Value Hedge ﻿ The Company had a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreement (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $45,000 to hedge its exposure to fair value fluctuations on a portion of its senior notes. The Swap was designated as a fair value hedge of the fixed interest rate obligation under the Company’s $175,000 9.5% senior notes. The critical terms of the Swap were aligned with the terms of the senior notes which resulted in no hedge ineffectiveness. The unrealized gain or loss for the effective portion of the hedge was deferred and reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as an asset or liability, as applicable, with the offset to the carrying value of the senior notes. ﻿ Under the Swap, the Company paid a variable interest rate equal to the six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 7.2% and it received a fixed interest rate of 9.5%. The Swap required semi-annual settlements on April 15 and October 15. The difference between amounts received and paid under the Swap was recognized as a component of interest expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. ﻿ In connection with the Company’s notice of redemption issued on September 15, 2014 to redeem all remaining outstanding senior notes, the interest rate fair value hedge was de-designated on that date. On October 23, 2014, the Company terminated the interest rate swap resulting in a gain of $371 recorded in other expense, net in the consolidated statement of operations in the fourth quarter of 2014. ﻿ The Swap reduced interest expense by $641 for the year ended December 31, 2014. ﻿ The notional amounts and fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows: ﻿
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Notional |  | Prepaid expenses |  | Accrued expenses and
﻿ | amounts (A) |  | and other current assets |  | other current liabilities
﻿ |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31, |  |  | December 31,
﻿ | 2016 | 2015 |  | 2016 | 2015 |  | 2016 | 2015
﻿Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿Cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿Forward currency contracts | $5,699 | $22,208 |  | $ - | $474 |  | $28 | $84
﻿Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿Forward currency contracts | $1,601 | $1,647 |  | $ - | $ - |  | $3 | $9
﻿
(A) | Notional amounts represent the gross contract / notional amount of the derivatives outstanding.
﻿ Gross amounts recorded for the cash flow hedges in other comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity and in net income (loss) for the years ended December 31 were as follows: ﻿ ﻿
﻿ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿ |  | Loss recorded |  | Loss reclassified from
﻿ |  | in other comprehensive |  | other comprehensive income
﻿ |  | income (loss) |  | (loss) into net income (loss)
﻿ |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014 |  | 2016 |  | 2015 |  | 2014
﻿Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
﻿Forward currency contracts | $ | (582) | $ | (671) |  | (46) | $ | (164) | $ | (1,060) |  | (310)
﻿Fixed price commodity contracts |  | - |  | - |  | (408) |  | - |  | - |  | (256)
﻿Total derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | $ | (582) | $ | (671) |  | (454) | $ | (164) | $ | (1,060) |  | (566)
﻿ Gains and losses reclassified from comprehensive loss into net income (loss) were recognized in cost of goods sold in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. ﻿ The net deferred loss of $28 on the cash flow hedge derivatives will be reclassified from other comprehensive loss to the consolidated st atements of operations in 2017. The Company has measured the ineffectiveness of the forward currency and commodity contracts and any amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ ﻿ Fair Value Measurements ﻿ The Company’s assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based on the reliability of the inputs used. Fair values estimated using Level 1 inputs consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Fair values estimated using Level 2 inputs, other than quoted prices, are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly and include among other things, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active or inactive as well as inputs other than quoted prices that are observable. For forward currency contracts, inputs include foreign currency exchange rates. Fair values estimated using Level 3 inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs. ﻿ The Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities fair valued using Level 1 or Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2016 or 2015. The fair value of financial assets using Level 2 inputs related to forward currency contracts were $0 and $474 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The fair value of financial liabilities using Level 2 inputs related to forward currency contracts were $31 and $93 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. ﻿ The Company recorded a non-recurring fair value adjustment of $51,458 related to the PST goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company utilized Level 3 inputs to estimate the fair value adjustment for nonfinancial assets. For additional information, see the discussion of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in Note 2. No non-recurring fair value adjustments were required for nonfinancial assets for the year s ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 820 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=36462937&loc=d3e19207-110258 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 30 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14172-108612 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 28 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6957238&loc=d3e14064-108612 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 21 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=49121117&loc=d3e13537-108611 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 16 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=49121117&loc=d3e13504-108611 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 10 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=49121117&loc=d3e13433-108611 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_FairValueDisclosuresTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration