XML 57 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities
Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). A fair value measurement reflects the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best available information. These assumptions include the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.
The Company classifies inputs to measure fair value using a three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. The categorization of financial instruments within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is prioritized into three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) and is defined as follows:
Level 1:
Pricing inputs are based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets (e.g., NYSE or NASDAQ). Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2:
Pricing inputs include benchmark yields, trade data, reported trades and broker dealer quotes, two-sided markets and industry and economic events, yield to maturity, Municipal Securities Rule Making Board reported trades and vendor trading platform data. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using various pricing services and broker pricing information including Electronic Communication Networks and broker feeds.
Level 3:
Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, including the Company’s own assumptions.
The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy. There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between fair value measurement classifications during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements as of September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
Balance as of
September 30, 2015
 
Level 1
Assets:
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
 
$
2,935

 
$
2,935

Total cash equivalents
 
$
2,935

 
$
2,935


The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands): 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
 
$
1,134

 
$
1,134

 
$

Certificates of deposit
 
980

 

 
980

Total cash equivalents
 
$
2,114

 
$
1,134

 
$
980


Other Financial Instruments
On June 10, 2015, the Company issued $120.0 million of 5.50% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “Convertible Notes”) (see Note 6). Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2015. The fair value of the liability component of the Convertible Notes, which approximated its carrying value due to the recent issuance of such Convertible Notes, was $80.4 million as of September 30, 2015. The debt and equity components of the Convertible Notes were measured using Level 3 inputs and are not measured on a recurring basis.