XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Legal proceedings
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Legal proceedings [Abstract]  
Legal proceedings
  (10) Legal proceedings.

 

On April 16, 2012, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing that its Board had determined the existence of the Accounting Irregularities beginning approximately during the second calendar quarter of 2007 and continuing in periods subsequent thereto, which could affect financial information reported since that time. On April 16, 2012, the Company also announced that it had engaged forensic accountants to analyze the Accounting Irregularities, and that financial statements and information reported since the inception of the Accounting Irregularities, believed to begin in the second calendar quarter of 2007, should not be relied upon. The Company brought the Accounting Irregularities to the attention of the SEC in a letter dated April 16, 2012. On June 18, 2012, the Company received written notice that the SEC had initiated a private investigation into the Accounting Irregularities, to determine whether any persons or entities had engaged in any possible violations of the federal securities laws. The Company has cooperated fully, and continue to cooperate fully, with the SEC staff in the investigation. This investigation is still pending as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, and there can be no certainty as to the outcome of this investigation, or to the findings of the SEC.

 

Also, in connection with the Accounting Irregularities, and the subsequent halt in trading of the Company's common stock on the Exchange, the Company has received notice of two lawsuits that have been filed by its shareholders. The first is a lawsuit filed by Grant Barfuss, one of the Company's shareholders, on September 7, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Although Mr. Barfuss desires this suit to be a class action, the court has not certified a class for this suit. Mr. Barfuss filed this suit against DGSE, Dr. L.S. Smith, the Company's former Chief Executive Officer, John Benson, the Company's former Chief Financial Officer, and William H. Oyster, the Company's former Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Barfuss alleges violations of securities laws and seeks unspecified damages, and alleges that certain of the Company's public filings in 2010 and 2011 were false and misleading. The second is a lawsuit filed by Jason Farmer, one of the Company's shareholders, on September 21, 2012 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Mr. Farmer filed this as a derivative lawsuit on behalf of DGSE against William H. Oyster, the Company's former Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer, James D. Clem, the Company's Chief Operating Officer, William Cordeiro, a member of the Company's Board, Craig Alan-Lee, a member of the Company's Board, David Rector, a member of the Company's Board, Dr. Smith and Mr. Benson, the Company's former Chief Financial Officer. Messrs. Clem, Cordeiro, Alan-Lee and Rector are members of the Company's Current Management, and their interests in this suit could be materially adverse to the Company. Mr. Farmer alleges that certain of the Company's proxy statements were false and misleading, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties owed to DGSE and that there was an abuse of control by the defendants. The suit seeks unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages, along with certain corporate governance changes, for DGSE's benefit.

 

The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (the "Comptroller") conducted a sales and use tax audit of DGSE with respect to the period March 1, 2006 through November 30, 2009 and subsequently sent a Notification of Audit Results, by letter dated December 17, 2010, asserting that the Company owes an amount of tax due, plus penalties and interest. The Company submitted a request for redetermination to the Comptroller on January 13, 2011. Some of the issues have been resolved with the auditor, and the auditor's tax adjustment schedules currently show a lower amount of tax due than was previously stated in the assessment letter. By letter dated August 25, 2011, the Comptroller stated that the Company's request for a redetermination hearing has been granted. The hearing has not yet taken place.

 

The Company is currently discussing, both internally among the members of its Board and with its outside counsel, whether it will take legal action against those officers and providers of professional services who were involved in the Accounting Irregularities.