XML 31 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.4
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company has certain financial assets and liabilities which have been classified as either Level 1, 2, or 3 within the fair value hierarchy as described below.

Level 1 — Fair value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Fair value based on inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 — Fair value based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and such inputs are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2022

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (1)

 

$

5,800

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,800

 

Marketable investments (2)

 

 

 

 

 

19,688

 

 

 

19,688

 

Total Assets

 

$

5,800

 

 

$

19,688

 

 

$

25,488

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (1)

 

$

6,885

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,885

 

Marketable investments (2)

 

 

 

 

$

18,509

 

 

 

18,509

 

Total Assets

 

$

6,885

 

 

$

18,509

 

 

$

25,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap (3)

 

$

 

 

$

(294

)

 

$

(294

)

Total Liabilities

 

$

 

 

$

(294

)

 

$

(294

)

(1)
Included in cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)
Marketable investments have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of the reporting period, utilizing third party pricing services or other market observable data. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation methods, including both income and market based approaches and observable market inputs to determine value. These observable market inputs include reportable trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads, broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, current spot rates and other industry and economic events.
(3)
The Company had an interest rate swap contract that hedged the risk of variability from interest payments on its borrowings (refer to Note 4 – Debt and Note 6 – Derivatives and Hedging). The fair value of the interest rate swap was based on mark-to-market valuations prepared by a third-party broker. Those valuations were based on observable interest rates and other observable market data, which the Company considers Level 2 inputs.

During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company did not transfer assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, there have been no changes to the valuation techniques for Level 2 assets and liabilities.

Level 3 activity consisted entirely of the contingent purchase price related to the acquisition of FeedbackNow during 2018. Changes in the fair value of Level 3 contingent consideration were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Contingent

 

 

 

Consideration

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

(2,511

)

Fair value adjustment of contingent purchase price (1)

 

 

(22

)

Payment of contingent purchase price (2)

 

 

2,680

 

Foreign exchange effect

 

 

(147

)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

$

 

(1)
Subsequent to the acquisition of FeedbackNow, the increases in the fair value of the contingent consideration were primarily due to the achievement of contract bookings during these periods. The Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine the fair value and increases or decreases in the simulation’s inputs would have resulted in higher or lower fair value measurements. These amounts were recognized as acquisition and integration costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)
During the third quarter of 2020, the second year financial targets were met and $2.7 million was paid to the sellers during the fourth quarter of 2020.