XML 23 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 3 – Fair Value Measurements



The following table sets forth by level within the ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and the Company’s non-financial assets that were recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.



 











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of December 31, 2017



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

$

45,542 

$

 -

$

 -

$

45,542 

Restricted certificates of deposit

$

5,720 

$

 -

$

 -

$

5,720 

Escrow receivable

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,420 

$

1,420 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of December 31, 2017



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,434 

$

1,434 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of December 31, 2016



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

$

15,156 

$

 -

$

 -

$

15,156 

Restricted certificates of deposit

$

5,970 

$

 -

$

 -

$

5,970 

Escrow receivable

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,910 

$

1,910 



The sale of the Company’s railcar repair and maintenance services business on September 30, 2015 resulted in $1,960 of the aggregate purchase price being placed into escrow in order to secure the indemnification obligations of FCRS and FCSL.  The fair market value of the remaining escrow receivable above represents the escrow balance of $1,470 , after cash received during 2017 of $490 and $1,960 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, net of the fair value of the indemnification obligations, which was estimated using the discounted probability-weighted cash flow method.

The carrying value of property, plant and equipment at the Company’s idled Danville, Illinois manufacturing facility was reduced to its estimated fair market value during the second quarter of 2017, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $333. Fair market value was estimated using the market approach using market data such as recent sales of comparable assets in active markets and estimated salvage values.



The carrying value of property, plant and equipment at the Company’s Johnstown, Pennsylvania administrative facility was reduced to its estimated fair market value during the third quarter of 2016, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1,255.  Fair market value was estimated using the market approach using market data such as recent sales of comparable assets in active markets and estimated salvage values.  The proceeds from sale of the facility during the first quarter of 2017 and the resulting gain on sale were not material.