XML 29 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 6Fair Value Measurements



The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and the Company’s non-financial assets that were recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.



















 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of March 31, 2018



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

$

38,497 

$

 -

$

 -

$

38,497 

Restricted certificates of deposit

$

5,452 

$

 -

$

 -

$

5,452 

Escrow receivable

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,420 

$

1,420 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 













 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of December 31, 2017



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

$

45,542 

$

 -

$

 -

$

45,542 

Restricted certificates of deposit

$

5,720 

$

 -

$

 -

$

5,720 

Escrow receivable

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,420 

$

1,420 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

As of December 31, 2017



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

$

 -

$

 -

$

$1,434 

$

1,434 







The sale of the Company’s railcar repair and maintenance services business on September 30, 2015 resulted in $1,960 of the aggregate purchase price being placed into escrow in order to secure the indemnification obligations of FCRS and FCSL.  The fair market value of the remaining escrow receivable above represents the escrow balance of $1,470 as of each of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 net of the fair value of the indemnification obligations, which was estimated using the discounted probability-weighted cash flow method.

The carrying value of property, plant and equipment at the Company’s Johnstown, Pennsylvania administrative facility was reduced to its estimated fair market value during the third quarter of 2016, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1,255.  Fair market value was estimated using the market approach using market data such as recent sales of comparable assets in active markets and estimated salvage values.  The proceeds from sale of the facility during the first quarter of 2017 and the resulting gain on sale were not material.