XML 34 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Business Acquisition
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Purchase Price Allocation for Business Acquisition [Abstract]  
Business Acquisition

Note 17 – Business Acquisition

On February 28, 2018, the Company acquired substantially all of the operating assets at the Shoals facility of Navistar, Inc. (“Navistar”) and its subsidiary, International Truck and Engine Investments Corporation, including their railcar business, and assumed the lease for the facility (the ”Acquisition”).  The Company had subleased a portion of the Shoals facility since 2013.  As a result of the Acquisition, the Company became the sole tenant of the approximately 2.2 million square-foot facility.  Additionally, the Company offered employment opportunities to the majority of Navistar’s approximately 200 employees on site.  Under the terms of the Acquisition, the total consideration due to Navistar for the purchase of the operating assets was $20,225.  The parties also negotiated a $24,130 lease incentive in favor of the Company in exchange for the Company assuming all remaining contractual lease obligations. Consideration for the acquisition was settled on a net basis and after certain other closing payments resulted in a payment of $2,655 from Navistar to the Company. The $24,130 lease incentive is included in deferred rent, current and deferred rent, long-term in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be amortized over the remaining lease term as a reduction of rent expense.  The Company incurred acquisition costs of approximately $400, which were primarily legal fees that were expensed as incurred.   







The purchase price allocation is as follows:









 

 



 

 

Inventories

$

3,611 

Other current assets

 

95 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

17,169 

Accounts and contractual payables

 

(650)



$

20,225 



The purchase price equaled the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired (fair value hierarchy level 3) and, therefore, no goodwill or bargain purchase was recorded. Substantially all of Navistar’s operations at the Shoals facility were in support of the Company’s activities. Therefore, it is impracticable to determine the amount of operating profit attributable to the acquired business included in the Company’s results of operations since the acquisition date as the Company has integrated the acquired business with its ongoing operations.  Also, the pro forma financial information for the Company’s historical business and the assets acquired was impracticable to calculate as a result of various service, cost sharing and sublease agreements that were in place at the Shoals facility with Navistar.