XML 38 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company holds certain financial instruments, which are recognized and disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in a transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Fair value is measured using the fair value hierarchy and related valuation methodologies as defined in the authoritative literature. This guidance provides a fair value framework that requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment.

The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 -
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 -
Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations, in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3 -
Significant unobservable inputs reflecting management's own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of long-term debt, interest rate swaps, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The carrying amount of these financial instruments approximated their fair value. The Company has two Level 2 fair value measurements all of which relate to the Company’s interest rate swaps. The Company utilizes interest rate swap contracts to manage its targeted mix of fixed and floating rate debt, and these swaps are valued using observable benchmark rates at commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the swaps (market approach). These interest rate swaps are discussed in detail in Note 7. The following table presents financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
 
 
(Level 2)
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
March 31,
2015 Fair Value
 
December 31,
2014 Fair Value
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Interest rate risk activities
Interest rate swap
 
$
26,000

 
$
37,000


There were no non-recurring fair value measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income was as follows:
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Location of Gain
Recognized
in Income on Derivative
 
Amount of Realized/Unrealized Gain Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Three months ended
 
 
 
March 31,
2015
 
March 31,
2014
Interest rate swap
 
Interest expense
 
$
6,000

 
$
13,000


As discussed in Note 7, the Company discontinued the use of hedge accounting for its interest rate swap, effective March 31, 2009 for the Capex swap. The Company has recorded all mark-to-market adjustments within interest expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, since the date the Company discontinued hedge accounting for the swap. It is anticipated that during the next twelve months the expiration and settlement of cash flow hedge contracts along with the amortization of losses on discontinued hedges will result in income statement recognition of amounts currently classified in accumulated other comprehensive loss of approximately $21,000, or $14,000 net of taxes.