XML 52 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
 5 Months Ended 7 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 14, 2022
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Dec. 31, 2019
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]    
graphic
 
As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above, our Compensation Committee has implemented an executive compensation program designed to link a substantial portion of our NEOs' compensation to the achievement of the Company's financial and strategic objectives, and to align our executive pay with changes in the value of our shareholders' investments. The following table shows the CAP to our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO” or “CEO”) for fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020 and the average CAP to our non-PEO NEOs for each fiscal year as compared with the performance of the Company as measured by the total shareholder return (“TSR”), net income, and Adjusted EBITDA and the performance of our peer group's TSR. The dollar values shown for CAP in the table below do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned or paid during the applicable year.
​
Year
 ​ ​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
(Current
CEO)(1)
 ​ ​
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(Current
CEO)(1)(7)
 ​ ​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
(Former
CEO)(2)
 ​ ​
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(Former
CEO)(2)(7)
 ​ ​
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs
 ​ ​
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs(7)
 ​ ​
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
 ​ ​
Net Income
(Loss) ($ in
thousands)(5)
 ​ ​
Adjusted EBITDA ($ in
thousands)(6)
 ​
​
Total
Shareholder
Return(3)
 ​ ​
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return(3)(4)
 ​
​
2022
 ​ ​
$5,824,544
 ​ ​
$5,513,187
 ​ ​
$4,425,156
 ​ ​
$(6,387,623)
 ​ ​
$2,059,452
 ​ ​
$897,701
 ​ ​
$81
 ​ ​
$115
 ​ ​
$62,273
 ​ ​
$116,999
 ​
​
2021
 ​ ​
—
 ​ ​
—
 ​ ​
$5,811,254
 ​ ​
$9,920,085
 ​ ​
$2,125,200
 ​ ​
$3,203,326
 ​ ​
$117
 ​ ​
$151
 ​ ​
$61,634
 ​ ​
$103,820
 ​
​
2020
 ​ ​
—
 ​ ​
—
 ​ ​
$3,420,004
 ​ ​
$1,999,169
 ​ ​
$1,241,280
 ​ ​
$815,963
 ​ ​
$81
 ​ ​
$103
 ​ ​
$(141,841)
 ​ ​
$38,728
 ​
(1)
These amounts reflect the compensation of Mr. Cooper (our “Current CEO”) who was reinstated as the Company's CEO effective June 14, 2022.
(2)
These amounts reflect the compensation of Mr. Beharelle (our “Former CEO”) who resigned as the Company's CEO effective June 14, 2022 (“Resignation Date”).
(3)
These amounts are based on information prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. and assume a $100 investment on fiscal year end (“FYE”) 2019 which was December 29, 2019. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2022. Index Data: Copyright Standard and Poor’s, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
(4)
These amounts represent the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies' stock market capitalization. The peer group used is the S&P 1500 Human Resources and Employment Services Index. The S&P 1500 Human Resources and Employment Services Index is the same index we use in our performance graph in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2022.
(5)
These amounts represent net income (loss) reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Form 10-K for the applicable year.
(6)
The Company has determined that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is the most important financial measure (not otherwise required in the table) used by the Company to link CAP to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year. See Appendix A for definition of Adjusted EBITDA as well as the reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA.
(7)
CAP was calculated according to applicable SEC rules, which require the following adjustments to amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and prior proxy statements:

​
Year
 ​ ​
Executive(s)
 ​ ​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
 ​ ​
Subtract
Stock
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year RS
and RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
RS and
RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair
Value of
Vested
Equity
Awards(e)
 ​ ​
Add Impact
of PSU
Modifications(c)
 ​ ​
Subtract Value
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to Meet
Vesting
Conditions(f)
 ​ ​
Compensation
Actually Paid
 ​
​
2022
 ​ ​
Current CEO
 ​ ​
$5,824,544
 ​ ​
$3,740,891
 ​ ​
$3,305,744
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$123,790
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$5,513,187
 ​
​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$4,425,156
 ​ ​
$3,933,997
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$(94,219)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$6,784,563
 ​ ​
$(6,387,623)
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,059,452
 ​ ​
$933,799
 ​ ​
$334,909
 ​ ​
$306,132
 ​ ​
$(137,017)
 ​ ​
$(708,787)
 ​ ​
$(23,189)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$897,701
 ​
​
2021
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$5,811,254
 ​ ​
$3,467,596
 ​ ​
$1,891,398
 ​ ​
$3,546,361
 ​ ​
$453,094
 ​ ​
$1,190,306
 ​ ​
$47,406
 ​ ​
$447,862
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$9,920,085
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,125,200
 ​ ​
$1,132,650
 ​ ​
$393,937
 ​ ​
$1,349,880
 ​ ​
$189,470
 ​ ​
$192,706
 ​ ​
$14,806
 ​ ​
$69,977
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$3,203,326
 ​
​
2020
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$3,420,004
 ​ ​
$2,056,424
 ​ ​
$1,041,589
 ​ ​
$650,988
 ​ ​
$(181,547)
 ​ ​
$(579,637)
 ​ ​
$(295,804)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$1,999,169
 ​
​
Other NEOs (b)
 ​ ​
$1,241,280
 ​ ​
$615,671
 ​ ​
$351,512
 ​ ​
$104,151
 ​ ​
$(34,060)
 ​ ​
$(111,113)
 ​ ​
$(106,824)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$13,312
 ​ ​
$815,963
 ​
(a)
For 2022 and 2021, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(b)
For 2020, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Defebaugh, Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(c)
The following table shows the estimated and actual payouts of the PSUs awarded as of each FYE date noted, used to calculate CAP above.
​
Estimated/Actual Payout as of:
 ​ ​
2017 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2018 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2019 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2020 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2021 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2022 PSU Award
 ​
​
FYE 2019
 ​ ​
67.0%
 ​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
72.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2020
 ​ ​
68.2%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2020
 ​ ​
​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Pre-Modification in 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
72.5%
 ​ ​
62.4%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2021 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
86.9%
 ​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
150.0%
 ​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2022 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
84.9%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2022
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
75.4%
 ​ ​
85.3%
 ​ ​
89.8%
 ​
(d)
On February 5, 2021, Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen each received a PSU award based on individual performance metrics (“Retention PSUs”), of which up to one-half could have vested on the second anniversary of the grant, and the remaining portion of these shares may vest on the third anniversary of the grant, in each case, only if certain individual performance criteria are met. As of FYE 2022, the Retention PSUs were estimated to payout for Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen at 45%,50% and 45%, respectively; the remainder of the Retentions PSUs may be earned and paid out on the third anniversary of the awards. For further details about the outstanding awards of our NEOs, please refer to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table in the Executive Compensation Tables Section of this proxy statement and prior proxy statements.
(e)
These amounts also include awards that were granted and vested during the same fiscal year. In 2022, this amount represents $123,790 for the fair value of RSUs which were granted and vested for Mr. Cooper for his service as a director of the Company prior to being reinstated as the Company's CEO. In 2020, this amount includes an increase of $8,970 for the average fair value of awards which were granted and vested for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that vested upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement), as well as an offsetting $115,794 reflecting the average change in fair value of the restricted shares, RSUs, and PSUs that vested in 2020 as of their vest date compared to the average fair value as of FYE 2019.
(f)
In 2022, this amount includes $1,830,485 for 66,202 restricted shares and RSUs and $4,954,078 for 153,388 PSUs which were forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. This amount does not include 64,234 RSUs or 80,292 PSUs which were granted to Mr. Beharelle during 2022 and forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. In 2020, this amount represents the average fair value of awards forfeited for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that were forfeited upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement).
     
Company Selected Measure Name     Adjusted EBITDA      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]    
(a)
For 2022 and 2021, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(b)
For 2020, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Defebaugh, Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
     
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]    
(4)
These amounts represent the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies' stock market capitalization. The peer group used is the S&P 1500 Human Resources and Employment Services Index. The S&P 1500 Human Resources and Employment Services Index is the same index we use in our performance graph in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2022.
     
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]    
(7)
CAP was calculated according to applicable SEC rules, which require the following adjustments to amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and prior proxy statements:

​
Year
 ​ ​
Executive(s)
 ​ ​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
 ​ ​
Subtract
Stock
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year RS
and RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
RS and
RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair
Value of
Vested
Equity
Awards(e)
 ​ ​
Add Impact
of PSU
Modifications(c)
 ​ ​
Subtract Value
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to Meet
Vesting
Conditions(f)
 ​ ​
Compensation
Actually Paid
 ​
​
2022
 ​ ​
Current CEO
 ​ ​
$5,824,544
 ​ ​
$3,740,891
 ​ ​
$3,305,744
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$123,790
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$5,513,187
 ​
​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$4,425,156
 ​ ​
$3,933,997
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$(94,219)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$6,784,563
 ​ ​
$(6,387,623)
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,059,452
 ​ ​
$933,799
 ​ ​
$334,909
 ​ ​
$306,132
 ​ ​
$(137,017)
 ​ ​
$(708,787)
 ​ ​
$(23,189)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$897,701
 ​
​
2021
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$5,811,254
 ​ ​
$3,467,596
 ​ ​
$1,891,398
 ​ ​
$3,546,361
 ​ ​
$453,094
 ​ ​
$1,190,306
 ​ ​
$47,406
 ​ ​
$447,862
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$9,920,085
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,125,200
 ​ ​
$1,132,650
 ​ ​
$393,937
 ​ ​
$1,349,880
 ​ ​
$189,470
 ​ ​
$192,706
 ​ ​
$14,806
 ​ ​
$69,977
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$3,203,326
 ​
​
2020
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$3,420,004
 ​ ​
$2,056,424
 ​ ​
$1,041,589
 ​ ​
$650,988
 ​ ​
$(181,547)
 ​ ​
$(579,637)
 ​ ​
$(295,804)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$1,999,169
 ​
​
Other NEOs (b)
 ​ ​
$1,241,280
 ​ ​
$615,671
 ​ ​
$351,512
 ​ ​
$104,151
 ​ ​
$(34,060)
 ​ ​
$(111,113)
 ​ ​
$(106,824)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$13,312
 ​ ​
$815,963
 ​
(a)
For 2022 and 2021, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(b)
For 2020, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Defebaugh, Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(c)
The following table shows the estimated and actual payouts of the PSUs awarded as of each FYE date noted, used to calculate CAP above.
​
Estimated/Actual Payout as of:
 ​ ​
2017 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2018 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2019 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2020 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2021 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2022 PSU Award
 ​
​
FYE 2019
 ​ ​
67.0%
 ​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
72.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2020
 ​ ​
68.2%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2020
 ​ ​
​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Pre-Modification in 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
72.5%
 ​ ​
62.4%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2021 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
86.9%
 ​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
150.0%
 ​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2022 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
84.9%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2022
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
75.4%
 ​ ​
85.3%
 ​ ​
89.8%
 ​
(d)
On February 5, 2021, Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen each received a PSU award based on individual performance metrics (“Retention PSUs”), of which up to one-half could have vested on the second anniversary of the grant, and the remaining portion of these shares may vest on the third anniversary of the grant, in each case, only if certain individual performance criteria are met. As of FYE 2022, the Retention PSUs were estimated to payout for Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen at 45%,50% and 45%, respectively; the remainder of the Retentions PSUs may be earned and paid out on the third anniversary of the awards. For further details about the outstanding awards of our NEOs, please refer to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table in the Executive Compensation Tables Section of this proxy statement and prior proxy statements.
(e)
These amounts also include awards that were granted and vested during the same fiscal year. In 2022, this amount represents $123,790 for the fair value of RSUs which were granted and vested for Mr. Cooper for his service as a director of the Company prior to being reinstated as the Company's CEO. In 2020, this amount includes an increase of $8,970 for the average fair value of awards which were granted and vested for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that vested upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement), as well as an offsetting $115,794 reflecting the average change in fair value of the restricted shares, RSUs, and PSUs that vested in 2020 as of their vest date compared to the average fair value as of FYE 2019.
(f)
In 2022, this amount includes $1,830,485 for 66,202 restricted shares and RSUs and $4,954,078 for 153,388 PSUs which were forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. This amount does not include 64,234 RSUs or 80,292 PSUs which were granted to Mr. Beharelle during 2022 and forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. In 2020, this amount represents the average fair value of awards forfeited for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that were forfeited upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement).
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount     $ 2,059,452 $ 2,125,200 $ 1,241,280  
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount     $ 897,701 3,203,326 815,963  
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]    
(7)
CAP was calculated according to applicable SEC rules, which require the following adjustments to amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement and prior proxy statements:

​
Year
 ​ ​
Executive(s)
 ​ ​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
 ​ ​
Subtract
Stock
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year RS
and RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add Year-
End Fair
Value of
Current
Year PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
RS and
RSU
Awards
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair Value
of Prior
PSU
Awards(c)(d)
 ​ ​
Add
Change in
Fair
Value of
Vested
Equity
Awards(e)
 ​ ​
Add Impact
of PSU
Modifications(c)
 ​ ​
Subtract Value
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to Meet
Vesting
Conditions(f)
 ​ ​
Compensation
Actually Paid
 ​
​
2022
 ​ ​
Current CEO
 ​ ​
$5,824,544
 ​ ​
$3,740,891
 ​ ​
$3,305,744
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$123,790
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$5,513,187
 ​
​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$4,425,156
 ​ ​
$3,933,997
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$(94,219)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$6,784,563
 ​ ​
$(6,387,623)
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,059,452
 ​ ​
$933,799
 ​ ​
$334,909
 ​ ​
$306,132
 ​ ​
$(137,017)
 ​ ​
$(708,787)
 ​ ​
$(23,189)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$897,701
 ​
​
2021
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$5,811,254
 ​ ​
$3,467,596
 ​ ​
$1,891,398
 ​ ​
$3,546,361
 ​ ​
$453,094
 ​ ​
$1,190,306
 ​ ​
$47,406
 ​ ​
$447,862
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$9,920,085
 ​
​
Other NEOs (a)
 ​ ​
$2,125,200
 ​ ​
$1,132,650
 ​ ​
$393,937
 ​ ​
$1,349,880
 ​ ​
$189,470
 ​ ​
$192,706
 ​ ​
$14,806
 ​ ​
$69,977
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$3,203,326
 ​
​
2020
 ​ ​
Former CEO
 ​ ​
$3,420,004
 ​ ​
$2,056,424
 ​ ​
$1,041,589
 ​ ​
$650,988
 ​ ​
$(181,547)
 ​ ​
$(579,637)
 ​ ​
$(295,804)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$1,999,169
 ​
​
Other NEOs (b)
 ​ ​
$1,241,280
 ​ ​
$615,671
 ​ ​
$351,512
 ​ ​
$104,151
 ​ ​
$(34,060)
 ​ ​
$(111,113)
 ​ ​
$(106,824)
 ​ ​
$—
 ​ ​
$13,312
 ​ ​
$815,963
 ​
(a)
For 2022 and 2021, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(b)
For 2020, the Other NEOs were Messrs. Defebaugh, Ferencz, Gafford, and Schweihs and Ms. Owen.
(c)
The following table shows the estimated and actual payouts of the PSUs awarded as of each FYE date noted, used to calculate CAP above.
​
Estimated/Actual Payout as of:
 ​ ​
2017 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2018 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2019 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2020 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2021 PSU Award
 ​ ​
2022 PSU Award
 ​
​
FYE 2019
 ​ ​
67.0%
 ​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
72.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2020
 ​ ​
68.2%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2020
 ​ ​
​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
50.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Pre-Modification in 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
72.5%
 ​ ​
62.4%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2021 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
91.0%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2021
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
86.9%
 ​ ​
75.0%
 ​ ​
150.0%
 ​ ​
​
​
Vest Date in 2022 (post-modification)
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
84.9%
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​
​
FYE 2022
 ​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
​ ​
75.4%
 ​ ​
85.3%
 ​ ​
89.8%
 ​
(d)
On February 5, 2021, Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen each received a PSU award based on individual performance metrics (“Retention PSUs”), of which up to one-half could have vested on the second anniversary of the grant, and the remaining portion of these shares may vest on the third anniversary of the grant, in each case, only if certain individual performance criteria are met. As of FYE 2022, the Retention PSUs were estimated to payout for Messrs. Gafford and Schweihs and Ms. Owen at 45%,50% and 45%, respectively; the remainder of the Retentions PSUs may be earned and paid out on the third anniversary of the awards. For further details about the outstanding awards of our NEOs, please refer to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table in the Executive Compensation Tables Section of this proxy statement and prior proxy statements.
(e)
These amounts also include awards that were granted and vested during the same fiscal year. In 2022, this amount represents $123,790 for the fair value of RSUs which were granted and vested for Mr. Cooper for his service as a director of the Company prior to being reinstated as the Company's CEO. In 2020, this amount includes an increase of $8,970 for the average fair value of awards which were granted and vested for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that vested upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement), as well as an offsetting $115,794 reflecting the average change in fair value of the restricted shares, RSUs, and PSUs that vested in 2020 as of their vest date compared to the average fair value as of FYE 2019.
(f)
In 2022, this amount includes $1,830,485 for 66,202 restricted shares and RSUs and $4,954,078 for 153,388 PSUs which were forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. This amount does not include 64,234 RSUs or 80,292 PSUs which were granted to Mr. Beharelle during 2022 and forfeited upon Mr. Beharelle's Resignation Date. In 2020, this amount represents the average fair value of awards forfeited for non-PEO NEOs (as a result of shares that were forfeited upon Mr. Defebaugh's retirement).
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]    
Our Compensation Committee is focused on the link between executive compensation, Company performance, and value creation for shareholders. While net income is a commonly used indicator of Company performance, our Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA in our compensation program focuses our executive’s attention on core profitability matters that lead to long-term value creation. Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure used by shareholders when evaluating the performance of the Company. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA in the STI program significantly impacts the NEO’s STI program and has a direct impact on CAP to the NEOs in a given year. Shareholders may also use the Company's TSR when evaluating the performance of the Company. This relationship between net income, Adjusted EBITDA, and CAP to our PEO and the average of non-PEO NEOs, which is further supported by the relationship between the CAP to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs and the Company's TSR, can be seen in the charts below.
graphic
 
*
2022 data is based on only our Current CEO's CAP because our Former CEO’s CAP was a negative number.
**
These amounts are based on information prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. and assume a $100 investment on FYE 2019 which was December 29, 2019. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2022. Index Data: Copyright Standard and Poor’s, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]    
Our Compensation Committee is focused on the link between executive compensation, Company performance, and value creation for shareholders. While net income is a commonly used indicator of Company performance, our Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA in our compensation program focuses our executive’s attention on core profitability matters that lead to long-term value creation. Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure used by shareholders when evaluating the performance of the Company. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA in the STI program significantly impacts the NEO’s STI program and has a direct impact on CAP to the NEOs in a given year. Shareholders may also use the Company's TSR when evaluating the performance of the Company. This relationship between net income, Adjusted EBITDA, and CAP to our PEO and the average of non-PEO NEOs, which is further supported by the relationship between the CAP to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs and the Company's TSR, can be seen in the charts below.
graphic
 
*
2022 data is based on only our Current CEO's CAP because our Former CEO's CAP was a negative number.
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]    
Our Compensation Committee is focused on the link between executive compensation, Company performance, and value creation for shareholders. While net income is a commonly used indicator of Company performance, our Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA in our compensation program focuses our executive’s attention on core profitability matters that lead to long-term value creation. Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure used by shareholders when evaluating the performance of the Company. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA in the STI program significantly impacts the NEO’s STI program and has a direct impact on CAP to the NEOs in a given year. Shareholders may also use the Company's TSR when evaluating the performance of the Company. This relationship between net income, Adjusted EBITDA, and CAP to our PEO and the average of non-PEO NEOs, which is further supported by the relationship between the CAP to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs and the Company's TSR, can be seen in the charts below.
graphic
 
*
2022 data is based on only our Current CEO's CAP because our Former CEO's CAP was a negative number.
     
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]    
Our Compensation Committee is focused on the link between executive compensation, Company performance, and value creation for shareholders. While net income is a commonly used indicator of Company performance, our Compensation Committee believes that using Adjusted EBITDA in our compensation program focuses our executive’s attention on core profitability matters that lead to long-term value creation. Adjusted EBITDA is also a measure used by shareholders when evaluating the performance of the Company. Our use of Adjusted EBITDA in the STI program significantly impacts the NEO’s STI program and has a direct impact on CAP to the NEOs in a given year. Shareholders may also use the Company's TSR when evaluating the performance of the Company. This relationship between net income, Adjusted EBITDA, and CAP to our PEO and the average of non-PEO NEOs, which is further supported by the relationship between the CAP to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs and the Company's TSR, can be seen in the charts below.
graphic
 
*
These amounts are based on information prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. and assume a $100 investment on FYE 2019 which was December 29, 2019. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2022. Index Data: Copyright Standard and Poor’s, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
     
Tabular List [Table Text Block]    
The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link CAP to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are listed in the table to the right, each of which is described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above or in prior proxy statements.
Financial Performance Measures
•
Adjusted EBITDA
•
Revenue
•
Return on Equity
•
Adjusted EBITDA Compound Annual Growth Rate
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 81 117 81  
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount     115 151 103  
Net Income (Loss)     $ 62,273,000 $ 61,634,000 $ (141,841,000)  
Company Selected Measure Amount     116,999,000 103,820,000 38,728,000  
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2017 Annual Award           67.00%
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage Vested 2017 Annual Award         68.20%  
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2018 Annual Award         75.00% 91.00%
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2019 Annual Award       86.90% 50.00% 72.00%
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2020 Annual Award     75.40% 75.00% 50.00%  
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage Pre Modification 2018 Annual Award       72.50%    
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage Pre Modification2019 Annual Award       62.40%    
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage Post Modification Vested2018 Annual Award       91.00%    
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2021 Annual Award     85.30% 150.00%    
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage Post Modification Vested2019 Annual Award     84.90%      
Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2022 Annual Award     89.80%      
PEO Name Mr. Beharelle Mr. Cooper   Mr. Beharelle Mr. Beharelle  
Fair Value of Awards Granted and Vested         $ 8,970  
Measure [Axis]: 1            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Measure Name     Adjusted EBITDA      
Non-GAAP Measure Description [Text Block]    
(6)
The Company has determined that Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is the most important financial measure (not otherwise required in the table) used by the Company to link CAP to Company performance for the most recently completed fiscal year. See Appendix A for definition of Adjusted EBITDA as well as the reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA.
     
Measure [Axis]: 2            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Measure Name     Revenue      
Measure [Axis]: 3            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Measure Name     Return on Equity      
Measure [Axis]: 4            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Measure Name     Adjusted EBITDA Compound Annual Growth Rate      
Mr. Beharelle [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
PEO Total Compensation Amount     $ 4,425,156 $ 5,811,254 3,420,004  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     (6,387,623) 9,920,085 1,999,169  
Mr. Cooper [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
PEO Total Compensation Amount     5,824,544 0 0  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     5,513,187 0 0  
Officers Compensation     $ 123,790      
Mr. Gafford [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Retention Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2022 Annual Award     45.00%      
Mr. Schweihs [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Retention Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2022 Annual Award     50.00%      
Ms. Owen [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Retention Performance Share Awards Payout Percentage 2022 Annual Award     45.00%      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Stock Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     $ (3,933,997) (3,467,596) (2,056,424)  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 1,891,398 1,041,589  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 3,546,361 650,988  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 453,094 (181,547)  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 1,190,306 (579,637)  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Vested Equity Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (94,219) 47,406 (295,804)  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Impact of PSU Modifications [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 447,862 0  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Beharelle [Member] | Value of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (6,784,563) 0 0  
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Stock Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (3,740,891)      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     3,305,744      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Vested Equity Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     123,790      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Impact of PSU Modifications [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0      
PEO [Member] | Mr. Cooper [Member] | Value of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0      
Non-PEO NEO [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Restricted Stock Fair Value     $ 1,830,485   115,794  
Number of Restricted Shares     66,202      
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Stock Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     $ (933,799) (1,132,650) (615,671)  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     334,909 393,937 351,512  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Current Year PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     306,132 1,349,880 104,151  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior RS and RSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (137,017) 189,470 (34,060)  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior PSU Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (708,787) 192,706 (111,113)  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Vested Equity Awards [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     (23,189) 14,806 (106,824)  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Impact of PSU Modifications [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 69,977 0  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Value of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Adjustment to Compensation Amount     0 $ 0 $ (13,312)  
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Performance Share Units PSUs [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Number of Value, Share-Based Payment Arrangement, Forfeited     $ 4,954,078      
Number of Share-Based Payment Arrangement, Forfeited     153,388      
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement Period, Net of Forfeitures     80,292      
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Restricted Stock Unit [Member]            
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]            
Share-Based Compensation Arrangement Period, Net of Forfeitures     64,234