<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.(A)(2)
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>b48619cnexv99wxayx2y.txt
<DESCRIPTION>PROXY VOTING POLICY
<TEXT>
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT - 99.(a)(z)

                              THE CHINA FUND, INC.
                       PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Board of Directors of The China Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") hereby adopts the
following policy and procedures with respect to voting proxies relating to Fund
securities managed by Martin Currie Inc. and Asian Direct Capital Management
(the "Listed Investment Manager" and the "Direct Investment Manager",
respectively and the "Investment Managers", collectively).

I.       POLICY

It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Fund (the "Board") to delegate
the responsibility for voting proxies relating to securities held by the Fund to
the Investment Managers as a part of the Managers' general management of the
Fund's assets, subject to the Board's continuing oversight. The Board of
Directors of the Fund hereby delegates such responsibility to the Investment
Managers, and directs each Investment Manager to vote proxies relating to Fund
portfolio securities managed by the Investment Manager consistent with the
duties and procedures set forth below. The Investment Managers may retain one or
more vendors to review, monitor and recommend how to vote proxies in a manner
consistent with the duties and procedures set forth below, to ensure such
proxies are voted on a timely basis and to provide reporting and/or record
retention services in connection with proxy voting for the Fund.

II.      FIDUCIARY DUTY

The right to vote a proxy with respect to securities held by the Fund is an
asset of the Fund. Each Investment Manager, to which authority to vote on behalf
of the Fund is delegated, acts as a fiduciary of the Fund and must vote proxies
in a manner consistent with the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.
In discharging this fiduciary duty, each Investment Manager must maintain and
adhere to its policies and procedures for addressing conflicts of interest and
must vote in a manner substantially consistent with its policies, procedures and
guidelines, as presented to the Board.

III.     PROCEDURES

The following are the procedures adopted by the Board for the administration of
this policy:

         A. Review of Investment Managers' Proxy Voting Procedures. The
         Investment Managers shall present to the Board their policies,
         procedures and other guidelines for voting proxies at least annually,
         and must notify the Board promptly of material changes to any of these
         documents, including changes to policies addressing conflicts of
         interest.

         B. Voting Record Reporting. Each Investment Manager shall provide the
         voting record information necessary for the completion and filing of
         Form-NPX to the Fund at least annually. Such voting record information
         shall be in a form acceptable to the Fund and shall be provided at such
         time(s) as are required for the timely filing of Form-NPX and at such
         additional time(s) as the Fund and the Investment Manager may agree
         from time to time. With respect to those proxies that an Investment
         Manager has identified as

<PAGE>

         involving a conflict of interest (1), the Investment Manager shall
         submit a separate report indicating the nature of the conflict of
         interest and how that conflict was resolved with respect to the voting
         of the proxy.

         C. Record Retention. The each Investment Manager shall maintain such
         records with respect to the voting of proxies as may be required by the
         Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated thereunder or
         by the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules promulgated
         thereunder.

         D. Conflicts of Interest. Any actual or potential conflicts of interest
         between or an Investment Manager and the Fund's shareholders arising
         from the proxy voting process will be addressed by the relevant
         Investment Manager and the Investment Manager's application of its
         proxy voting procedures pursuant to the delegation of proxy voting
         responsibilities to the Investment Manager. In the event that the
         Investment Manager notifies the officer(s) of the Fund that a conflict
         of interest cannot be resolved under the Investment Manager's Proxy
         Voting Procedures, such officer(s) are responsible for notifying the
         Chairman of the Board of the Fund of the irreconcilable conflict of
         interest and assisting the Chairman with any actions he determines are
         necessary.

IV.      REVOCATION

The delegation by the Board of the authority to vote proxies relating to
securities of the Fund is entirely voluntary and may be revoked by the Board, in
whole or in part, at any time.

V.       ANNUAL FILING

The Fund shall file an annual report of each proxy voted with respect to
securities of the Fund during the twelve-month period ended June 30 on Form N-PX
not later than August 31 of each year.(2)

VI.      DISCLOSURES

         A. The Fund shall include in its annual report filed on Form N-CSR:

--------------------

(1) As it is used in this document, the term "conflict of interest" refers to a
situation in which the Investment Managers or affiliated persons of the
Investment Managers have a financial interest in a matter presented by a proxy
other than the obligation they incur as Investment Managers to the Fund which
could potentially compromise the Investment Managers' independence of judgment
and action with respect to the voting of the proxy.

(2) The Fund must file its first report on Form N-PX not later than August 31,
2004, for the twelve-month period beginning July 1, 2003, and ending June 30,
2004.

<PAGE>

                  1. a description of this policy and of the policies and
                  procedures used by the Fund and the Investment Managers to
                  determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities
                  or copies of such policies and procedures; and

                  2. a statement disclosing that a description of the policies
                  and procedures used by or on behalf of the Fund to determine
                  how to vote proxies relating to securities of the Fund is
                  available without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund's
                  toll-free telephone number; through a specified Internet
                  address, if applicable; and on the SEC's website; and

                  3. a statement disclosing that information regarding how the
                  Fund voted proxies relating to Fund securities during the most
                  recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without
                  charge, upon request, by calling the Fund's toll-free
                  telephone number; or through a specified Internet address; or
                  both; and on the SEC's website.

VII.     REVIEW OF POLICY

The Board shall review from time to time this policy to determine its
sufficiency and shall make and approve any changes that it deems necessary from
time to time.

Adopted: September 12, 2003

<PAGE>

         PROXY VOTING POLICY
         ASIAN DIRECT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

INTRODUCTION

Asian Direct Capital Management ("ADCM") seeks to vote proxies in the best
interests of its clients. In the ordinary course, this entails voting proxies in
a way which ADCM believes will maximize the monetary value of each portfolio's
holdings. ADCM takes the view that this will benefit our direct clients (e.g.
investment funds) and, indirectly, the ultimate owners and beneficiaries of
those clients (e.g. fund shareholders).

Oversight of the proxy voting process is the responsibility of the ADCM
Investment Committee. ADCM's Compliance Officer is responsible for implementing
processes and procedures to ensure the objectives of this policy are properly
carried out. In addition to voting proxies, ADCM:

         1)       describes its proxy voting procedures to its clients in Part
                  II of its Form ADV;

         2)       provides the client with this written proxy policy, upon
                  request;

         3)       discloses to its clients how they may obtain information on
                  how ADCM voted the client's proxies;

         4)       matches proxies received with holdings as of record date;

         5)       reconciles holdings as of record date and rectifies any
                  discrepancies;

         6)       generally applies its proxy voting policy consistently and
                  keeps records of votes for each client;

         7)       documents the reason(s) for voting for all non-routine items;
                  and

         8)       keeps records of such proxy voting available for inspection by
                  the client or governmental agencies.

PROCESS

All proxies received on behalf of ADCM clients are voted according to our
guidelines listed below, as long as there are no special circumstances relating
to that company or proxy request.

However, from time to time, proxy votes will be solicited which (i) involve
special circumstances and require additional research and discussion or (ii) are
not directly addressed by our policies. These proxies are identified through a
number of methods, including but not limited to concerns of clients, review by
internal proxy specialists, and questions from consultants.

In instances of special circumstances or issues not directly addressed by our
policies, the Investment Team is consulted for a determination of the proxy
vote. The first determination is whether there is a material conflict of
interest between the interests of our client and those of ADCM. If the
Investment Team determines that there is a material conflict, the process
detailed below under "Potential Conflicts" is followed. If there is no material
conflict, we examine each of the issuer's proposals in detail in seeking to
determine what vote would be in the best interests of our clients. At this
point, the Investment Committee makes a voting decision based on maximizing the
monetary value of each portfolios' holdings. However, the Investment Committee
may determine that a proxy involves the consideration of particularly
significant issues and may seek additional guidance from ADCM's Compliance
Officer, and SSgA Compliance personnel.

ADCM also endeavors to show sensitivity to local market practices when voting
proxies of non-U.S. issuers.

<PAGE>

VOTING

For most issues and in most circumstances, we abide by the following general
guidelines. However, as discussed above, in certain circumstances, we may
determine that it would be in the best interests of our clients to deviate from
these guidelines.

Management Proposals

I.       ADCM votes in support of management on the following ballot items,
         which are fairly common management sponsored initiatives.

         -        Elections of directors who do not appear to have been remiss
                  in the performance of their oversight responsibilities

         -        Approval of auditors

         -        Directors' and auditors' compensation

         -        Directors' liability and indemnification

         -        Discharge of board members and auditors

         -        Financial statements and allocation of income

         -        Dividend payouts that are greater than or equal to country and
                  industry standards

         -        Authorization of share repurchase programs

         -        General updating of or corrective amendments to charter

         -        Change in Corporation Name

         -        Elimination of cumulative voting

II.      ADCM votes in support of management on the following items, which have
potentially substantial financial or best-interest impact:

         -        Capitalization changes which eliminate other classes of stock
                  and voting rights

         -        Changes in capitalization authorization for stock splits,
                  stock dividends, and other specified needs which are no more
                  than 50% of the existing authorization for U.S. companies and
                  no more than 100% of existing authorization for non-U.S.
                  companies

         -        Elimination of pre-emptive rights for share issuance of less
                  than a given percentage (country specific - ranging from 5% to
                  20%) of the outstanding shares

         -        Elimination of "poison pill" rights

         -        Stock purchase plans with an exercise price of not less that
                  85% of fair market value

         -        Stock option plans which are incentive based and not excessive

<PAGE>

         -        Other stock-based plans which are appropriately structured

         -        Reductions in super-majority vote requirements

         -        Adoption of anti-"greenmail" provisions

III. ADCM votes against management on the following items, which have
potentially substantial financial or best interest impact:

         -        Capitalization changes that add "blank check" classes of stock
                  or classes that dilute the voting interests of existing
                  shareholders

         -        Changes in capitalization authorization where management does
                  not offer an appropriate rationale or which are contrary to
                  the best interest of existing shareholders

         -        Anti-takeover and related provisions that serve to prevent the
                  majority of shareholders from exercising their rights or
                  effectively deter appropriate tender offers and other offers

         -        Amendments to bylaws which would require super-majority
                  shareholder votes to pass or repeal certain provisions

         -        Elimination of Shareholders' Right to Call Special Meetings

         -        Establishment of classified boards of directors

         -        Reincorporation in a state which has more stringent
                  anti-takeover and related provisions

         -        Shareholder rights plans that allow the board of directors to
                  block appropriate offers to shareholders or which trigger
                  provisions preventing legitimate offers from proceeding

         -        Excessive compensation

         -        Change-in-control provisions in non-salary compensation plans,
                  employment contracts, and severance agreements which benefit
                  management and would be costly to shareholders if triggered

         -        Adjournment of Meeting to Solicit Additional Votes

         -        "Other business as properly comes before the meeting"
                  proposals which extend "blank check" powers to those acting as
                  proxy

         -        Proposals requesting re-election of insiders or affiliated
                  directors who serve on audit, compensation, and nominating
                  committees.

IV.      ADCM evaluates Mergers and Acquisitions on a case-by-case basis.
Consistent with our proxy policy, we support management in seeking to achieve
their objectives for shareholders. However, in all cases, ADCM uses its
discretion in order to maximize shareholder value. ADCM, generally votes, as
follows:

         -        Against offers with potentially damaging consequences for
                  minority shareholders because of illiquid stock, especially in
                  some non-US markets

<PAGE>

         -        For offers that concur with index calculators treatment and
                  our ability to meet our clients return objectives for passive
                  funds

         -        Against offers when there are prospects for an enhanced bid or
                  other bidders

         -        For proposals to restructure or liquidate closed end
                  investment funds in which the secondary market price is
                  substantially lower than the net asset value

Shareholder Proposals

Traditionally, shareholder proposals have been used to encourage management and
other shareholders to address socio-political issues. ADCM believes that it is
inappropriate to use client assets to attempt to affect such issues. Thus, we
examine shareholder proposals primarily to determine their economic impact on
shareholders.

I.       ADCM votes in support of shareholders on the following ballot items,
which are fairly common shareholder-sponsored initiatives:

         -        Requirements that auditors attend the annual meeting of
                  shareholders

         -        Establishment of an annual election of the board of directors

         -        Mandates requiring a majority of independent directors on the
                  Board of Directors and the audit, nominating, and compensation
                  committees

         -        Mandates that amendments to bylaws or charters have
                  shareholder approval

         -        Mandates that shareholder-rights plans be put to a vote or
                  repealed

         -        Establishment of confidential voting

         -        Expansions to reporting of financial or compensation-related
                  information, within reason

         -        Repeals of various anti-takeover related provisions

         -        Reduction or elimination of super-majority vote requirements

         -        Repeals or prohibitions of "greenmail" provisions

         -        "Opting-out" of business combination provisions

         -        Proposals requiring the disclosure of executive retirement
                  benefits if the issuer does not have an independent
                  compensation committee

II.      In light of recent events surrounding corporate auditors and taking
into account corporate governance provisions released by the SEC, NYSE, and
NASDAQ, ADCM votes in support of shareholders on the following ballot items,
which are fairly common shareholder-sponsored initiatives:

         -        Disclosure of Auditor and Consulting relationships when the
                  same or related entities are conducting both activities

<PAGE>

         -        Establishment of selection committee responsible for the final
                  approval of significant management consultant contract awards
                  where existing firms are already acting in an auditing
                  function

         -        Mandates that Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committee
                  members should all be independent directors

         -        Mandates giving the Audit Committee the sole responsibility
                  for the selection and dismissal of the auditing firm and any
                  subsequent result of audits are reported to the audit
                  committee

III.     ADCM votes against shareholders on the following initiatives, which are
fairly common shareholder-sponsored initiatives:

         -        Limits to tenure of directors

         -        Requirements that candidates for directorships own large
                  amounts of stock before being eligible to be elected

         -        Restoration of cumulative voting in the election of directors

         -        Requirements that the company provide costly, duplicative, or
                  redundant reports; or reports of a non-business nature

         -        Restrictions related to social, political, or special interest
                  issues which affect the ability of the company to do business
                  or be competitive and which have significant financial or
                  best-interest impact

         -        Proposals which require inappropriate endorsements or
                  corporate actions

         -        Requiring the company to expense stock options unless already
                  mandated by FASB (or similar body) under regulations that
                  supply a common valuation model.

         -        Proposal asking companies to adopt full tenure holding periods
                  for their executives.

         -        Proposals requiring the disclosure of executive retirement
                  benefits if the issuer has an independent compensation
                  committee

Shareholder Activism

We at ADCM agree entirely with the United States Department of Labor's position
that "where proxy voting decisions may have an effect on the economic value of
the plan's underlying investment, plan fiduciaries should make proxy voting
decisions with a view to enhancing the value of the shares of stock" (IB 94-2).
Our proxy voting policy and procedures are designed to ensure that our clients
receive the best possible returns on their investments.

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS

As discussed above under Process, from time to time, the Investment Committee
will review a proxy which presents a potential material conflict. For example,
ADCM or its affiliates may provide services to a company whose management is
soliciting proxies, or to another entity which is a proponent of a particular
proxy proposal. Another example could arise when ADCM has business or other
relationships with participants involved in proxy contests, such as a candidate
for a corporate directorship.

<PAGE>

As a fiduciary to its clients, ADCM takes these potential conflicts very
seriously. While ADCM's only goal in addressing any such potential conflict is
to ensure that proxy votes are cast in the clients' best interests and are not
affected by ADCM's potential conflict, there are a number of courses ADCM may
take. The final decision as to which course to follow shall be made by the
Investment Committee.

When the matter falls clearly within one of the proposals enumerated above,
casting a vote which simply follows ADCM's pre-determined policy would eliminate
ADCM's discretion on the particular issue and hence avoid the conflict.

In other cases, where the matter presents a potential material conflict and is
not clearly within one of the enumerated proposals, or is of such a nature that
ADCM believes more active involvement is necessary, the Investment Committee
will follow one of two courses of action. First, ADCM may employ the services of
a third party, wholly independent of ADCM, its affiliates and those parties
involved in the proxy issue, to determine the appropriate vote.

Second, in certain situations the Investment Committee may determine that the
employment of a third party is unfeasible, impractical or unnecessary. In such
situations, the Investment Committee shall make a decision as to the voting of
the proxy. The basis for the voting decision, including the basis for the
determination that the decision is in the best interests of ADCM's clients,
shall be formalized in writing as a part of the minutes to the ADCM Investment
Committee. As stated above, which action is appropriate in any given scenario
would be the decision of the Investment Committee in carrying out its duty to
ensure that the proxies are voted in the clients', and not ADCM's, best
interests.

RECORDKEEPING

In accordance with applicable law, ADCM shall retain the following documents for
not less than five years from the end of the year in which the proxies were
voted, the first two years in ADCM's office:

         1)       ADCM's Proxy Voting Policy and any additional procedures
                  created pursuant to such Policy;

         2)       a copy of each proxy statement ADCM receives regarding
                  securities held by its clients (note: this requirement may be
                  satisfied by a third party who has agreed in writing to do so
                  or by obtaining a copy of the proxy statement from the EDGAR
                  database);

         3)       a record of each vote cast by ADCM (note: this requirement may
                  be satisfied by a third party who has agreed in writing to do
                  so);

         4)       a copy of any document created by ADCM that was material in
                  making its voting decision or that memorializes the basis for
                  such decision; and

         5)       a copy of each written request from a client, and response to
                  the client, for information on how ADCM voted the client's
                  proxies.

<PAGE>

DISCLOSURE OF CLIENT VOTING INFORMATION

Any client who wishes to receive information on how its proxies were voted
should contact ADCM's Compliance Officer.

<PAGE>

                   PROXY VOTING POLICY FOR MARTIN CURRIE, INC.

                    STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR
                                 VOTING PROXIES

INTRODUCTION

As a registered investment adviser, Martin Currie, Inc. ("Martin Currie," "we"
or "us") has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our
clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must exercise voting rights
in the best interests of our clients.

Martin Currie recognizes the importance of good corporate governance in ensuring
that management and boards of directors fulfill their obligations to
shareholders. As part of our investment process, we take into account the
attitudes of management and boards of directors on corporate governance issues
when deciding whether to invest in a company.

Martin Currie is a global investment manager, and invests significantly in
emerging markets. It should be noted that protection for shareholders may vary
significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in some cases may be
substantially less than in the U.S. or developed countries.

This statement is intended to comply with Rule 206(4)-6 of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940. It sets forth the policy and procedures of Martin Currie,
Inc. for voting proxies for our clients, including investment companies
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

PROXY VOTING POLICIES

It is the general policy of Martin Currie to support management of the companies
in which it invests and will cast votes in accordance with management's
proposals. However, Martin Currie reserves the right to depart from this policy
in order to avoid voting decisions that we believe may be contrary to our
clients' best interests.

ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS: In many instances, election of directors is a routine
voting issue. Unless there is a proxy fight for seats on the Board or we
determine that there are other compelling reasons for withholding votes for
directors, we will vote in favor of the management proposed slate of directors.
That said, we believe that directors have a duty to respond to shareholder
actions that have received significant shareholder support. We may withhold
votes for directors that fail to act on key issues such as failure to implement
proposals to declassify boards, failure to implement a majority vote
requirement, failure to submit a rights plan to a shareholder vote and failure
to act on tender offers where a majority of shareholders have tendered their
shares.

APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS: The selection of an independent accountant to audit a
company's financial statements is generally a routine business matter. Martin
Currie believes that management remains in the best position to choose the
accounting firm and will generally support management's recommendation.

CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE: Changes in a company's charter, articles of
incorporation or by-laws are often technical and administrative in nature.
Absent a compelling reason to the contrary, Martin Currie

<PAGE>

will cast its votes in accordance with the company's management on such
proposals. However, we will review and analyze on a case-by-case basis any
non-routine proposals that are likely to affect the structure and operation of
the company or have a material economic effect on the company.

CORPORATE RESTRUCTURINGS, MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: Martin Currie believes proxy
votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are an extension of the investment
decision and will take account of our investment process policy in deciding how
to vote.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: Martin Currie recognizes the importance of good corporate
governance in ensuring that management and the board of directors fulfil their
obligations to the shareholders. We generally favor proposals promoting
transparency and accountability within a company.

SOCIAL AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY: Martin Currie recognizes the importance of
supporting sound and responsible policies in relation to social, political and
environmental issues. However, in the interests of shareholders, we reserve the
right to vote against proposals that are unduly burdensome or result in
unnecessary and excessive costs to the company. We may abstain from voting on
social proposals that do not have a readily determinable financial impact on
shareholder value.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: Martin Currie believes that company management and the
compensation committee of the board of directors should, within reason, be given
latitude to determine the types and mix of compensation and benefit awards
offered. Whether proposed by a shareholder or management, we will review
proposals relating to executive compensation plans and, if deemed excessive, may
vote against the proposals.

PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES

PROXY VOTING

Our Market data team is responsible for the co-ordination of Martin Currie's
proxy voting. They liaise with the Product managers and/or the Proxy voting
committee to ascertain how Martin Currie will vote. They will then instruct the
relevant Custodians. The Market data team is also responsible for ensuring that
full and adequate records of proxy voting are kept.

The Product managers will implement the Proxy voting policies by instructing
proxy voting in accordance with the general principles contained herein.

PROXY VOTING COMMITTEE

A.       WE HAVE FORMED A PROXY VOTING COMMITTEE TO REGULARLY REVIEW OUR GENERAL
PROXY POLICIES AND CONSIDER SPECIFIC PROXY VOTING MATTERS AS AND WHEN DEEMED
NECESSARY. MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEES INCLUDE SENIOR INVESTMENT PERSONNEL AND
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LEGAL & COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT. THE COMMITTEE MAY ALSO
EVALUATE PROXIES WHERE WE FACE A MATERIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (AS DISCUSSED
BELOW).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Martin Currie recognizes that there is a potential conflict of interest when we
vote a proxy solicited by an issuer with whom we have any material business or
personal relationship that may affect how we vote on the issuer's proxy. We
believe that oversight by the proxy voting committee ensures that proxies are
voted with only our clients' best interests in mind. In order to avoid any
perceived conflict of interests, the following procedures have been established
for use when we encounter a potential conflict.

<PAGE>

         1.       The Market data team will refer to the Legal and compliance
                  team any proxy votes that are issued by existing clients or
                  where Martin Currie holds a significant voting percentage of
                  the company. The Legal and compliance team will make the
                  initial determination about whether a material conflict of
                  interest exists based on the facts and circumstances of each
                  particular situation.

         2.       If our proposed vote is consistent with our stated proxy
                  voting policy, no further review is necessary.

         3.       If our proposed vote is contrary to our stated proxy voting
                  policy but is also contrary to management's recommendation, no
                  further review is necessary.

         4.       If our proposed vote is contrary to our stated proxy voting
                  policy and is consistent with management's recommendation, the
                  proposal is escalated to the proxy committee for final review
                  and determination.

PROXIES OF CERTAIN NON-U.S. ISSUERS

Proxy voting in certain countries requires "share blocking." That is,
shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly
before the date of the meeting (usually one-week) with a designated depositary.
During this blocking period, shares that will be voted at the meeting cannot be
sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares are returned to the
clients' custodian banks. Martin Currie may determine that the value of
exercising the vote does not outweigh the detriment of not being able to
transact in the shares during this period. Accordingly, if share blocking is
required we may abstain from voting those shares. In such a situation we would
have determined that the cost of voting exceeds the expected benefit to the
client.

PROXY VOTING RECORD

Clients may obtain information on how Martin Currie voted with respect to their
proxies by contacting our Client services team at Martin Currie, Inc., Saltire
Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH1 2ES, tel.
011-44-131-229-5252, fax 011-44-131-222-2527 or email
clientservices@martincurrie.com

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
