XML 46 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Contingencies
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Contingencies
12.
Contingencies
 
 The Company filed a civil complaint on February 17, 2010 in the U.S. District Court (SD, Cal) against Barry Minkow and the Fraud Discovery Institute, Inc. (collectively, “Minkow”), iBusiness Reporting, and its editor William Lobdell, Tracy Coenen and Sequence, Inc. (collectively, “Coenen”), “Zee Yourself”, and Robert L. Fitzpatrick (“FitzPatrick”) for Defamation, Market Manipulation and Unfair Business Practices, alleging a scheme of market manipulation of Medifast stock for Defendants’ monetary gain, by damaging the business reputation of Medifast and its Take Shape For Life division. Bradley T. MacDonald, former Executive Chairman of Medifast and Company shareholder, joined the lawsuit individually.  The lawsuit seeks $270 million in compensatory damages, punitive damages, and ancillary relief.  In March 2011, the District Court granted in part and denied in part certain Anti-SLAPP Motions to Strike (i.e. motions to dismiss) previously filed by all Defendants.  The Company has appealed that portion of the District Court’s ruling which dismissed its defamation claims against Minkow and Coenen in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  Defendant FitzPatrick’s motion was denied as to the Company’s defamation claim, and FitzPatrick has appealed that portion of the Court’s ruling.  Both appeals have been fully-briefed and oral argument was held on March 5, 2013.  On May 20, 2013, the Court deferred its decision on Medifast and FitzPatrick’s appeals pending the determination of a petition for rehearing en banc in another Anti-SLAPP appeal, Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC, Case No. 11-55016, filed on April 30, 2013.  That petition is currently pending before the Ninth Circuit.
 
On July 20, 2012, Jason Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a proposed consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in response to the FTC’s investigation of certain statements in the Company’s advertising for its weight-loss programs.  On September 17, 2012 the consent decree was entered and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The consent decree replaces a previous consent order entered into by Jason Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the FTC in 1992.  The FTC expressed concern that some of the Company’s advertising contained claims which were not compatible with current standards for substantiation.  Pursuant to the consent decree, the Company agreed to modify certain advertising claims in this regard and agreed to ensure that its clinical studies meet the protocol contained in the consent agreement.  The Company paid a civil penalty of $3.7 million to resolve the FTC’s concerns and avoid protracted legal proceedings.  The Company accrued for the penalty in the second quarter of 2012 as part of selling, general & administration expenses.