v3.10.0.1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, they do not contain all information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. Such unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2017 audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2018.
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring, necessary to fairly state its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The December 31, 2017 balance sheet included herein was derived from the audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures or notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Fair Value Disclosures
 
The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:
 
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, purchase and other deposits, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, due to affiliates and share repurchases payable:
 These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.
 
Derivative Instruments
:  The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The valuation of these instruments is determined using a proprietary model that utilizes observable inputs. As such, the Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs. The proprietary model uses the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are estimated using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit risks to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.
 
Unsecured Credit Facility
:  The fair value of the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6) approximates its carrying value as the interest rates and other terms are comparable to those available in the market place for a similar credit facility.
 
Mortgage notes payable:
 The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Restricted Cash
 
Restricted cash is comprised of funds which are restricted for use as required by certain lenders in conjunction with an acquisition or debt financing and for on-site and tenant improvements.
 
Pursuant to lease agreements, the Company has obligations to pay for $560,740 in site and tenant improvements to be incurred by tenants as of June 30, 2018, including a 72.7% share of the tenant improvements for the Santa Clara property. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had $334,471 and $944,582, respectively, of restricted cash held to fund the improvements.
Other Comprehensive Income Loss [Policy Text Block]
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
For all periods presented, other comprehensive income (loss) is the same as net income (loss).
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Per Share Data
 
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of common stock equals basic earnings per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company has presented net income (loss) per share amounts on the accompanying statements of operations for Class C and S share classes as a combined common share class. Application of the two-class method for allocating income (loss) in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, 
Earnings per Share
, would have resulted in a net loss per share of $(0.02) for Class C shares and $(0.07) for Class S shares for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and a net loss per share of $(0.02) for Class C shares and $(0.11) for Class S shares for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The differences in net income (loss) per share if allocated under this method primarily reflects the lower effective dividends per share for Class S shareholders as a result of the payment of the deferred commission to the Class S distributor of these shares, and also reflects the impact of the timing of the declaration of the dividends relative to the time the shares were outstanding. The Company began offering shares of Class S common stock exclusively to non-U.S. Persons in August 2017
.
 
Since the Company’s board of directors declared distributions for four months (December 2017 through March 2018) during the three months ended March 31, 2018 in order to transition to a process of declaring dividends prior to the beginning of the month, the dividends declared per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2018 reflects seven months of dividends rather than six months of dividends.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
New Accounting Standards Issued and Adopted
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, 
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
 (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09, as amended, requires an entity to use a five-step model to determine when to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries. ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue requirements in
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)
and most industry specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. This ASU requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also to provide certain additional disclosures. The Company evaluated each of its revenue streams and their related accounting policies under ASU 2014-09. Rental income and tenant reimbursements earned from leasing the Company’s real estate properties are excluded from ASU 2014-09 and will be assessed with the adoption of the lease ASU as discussed below. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. However, future real estate sales contracts will qualify as sales to noncustomers. The Company will assess and implement any future recognition of gains or losses on sales of properties according to the provisions of ASU 2014-09.
 
New Accounting Standards Recently Issued and Not Yet Adopted
 
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, 
Leases (Topic 842)
(“ASU 2016-02”). The amendments in ASU 2016-02 change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. Under ASU 2016-02, the accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under Topic 840 leases. The large majority of operating leases shall remain classified as operating leases and lessors should continue to recognize rental income for those leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 may impact the timing, recognition, presentation and disclosures related to the Company’s tenant reimbursements earned from leasing its real estate properties, although the Company does not expect a significant impact. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The Company expects to adopt the practical expedients available for implementation under ASU 2016-02. By adopting the practical expedients, the Company will not be required to reassess (i) whether an expired or existing contract meets the definition of a lease and (ii) the lease classification at the adoption date for expired or existing leases. ASU 2016-02 will also require new disclosures within the notes to its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.