<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-99.77E LEGAL
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>h85202ex77e.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EX-99.77E
<TEXT>
                                                                   SUB-ITEM 77E

       INVESCO VAN KAMPEN TRUST FOR INVESTMENT GRADE NEW YORK MUNICIPALS

                               LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

SETTLED REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO MARKET
TIMING

     On October 8, 2004, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (Invesco), successor by merger
to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. and INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (IFG), both former
investment advisers, along with Invesco Aim Distributors, n/k/a Invesco
Distributors, Inc. (Invesco Distributors) reached final settlements with certain
regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the New York
Attorney General and the Colorado Attorney General, to resolve civil enforcement
actions and/or investigations related to market timing and related activity in
the AIM Funds (n/k/a the Invesco Funds), including those formerly advised by
IFG. As part of the settlements, a $325 million fair fund ($110 million of which
is civil penalties) was created to compensate shareholders harmed by market
timing and related activity in funds formerly advised by IFG. Additionally,
Invesco and Invesco Distributors created a $50 million fair fund ($30 million of
which is civil penalties) to compensate shareholders harmed by market timing and
related activity in funds advised by Invesco, which was done pursuant to the
terms of the settlement. The methodology of the fair funds distributions was
determined by Invesco's independent distribution consultant (IDC Plan), in
consultation with Invesco and the independent trustees of the Invesco Funds, and
approved by the SEC on May 23, 2008.

     The IDC Plan provides for distribution to all eligible investors for the
periods spanning January 1, 2000 through July 31, 2003 (for the IFG Fair Fund)
and January 1, 2001 through September 30, 2003 (for the AIM Fair Fund), their
proportionate share of the applicable Fair Fund to compensate such investors for
injury they may have suffered as a result of market timing in the affected
funds. The IDC Plan includes a provision for any residual amounts in the Fair
Funds to be distributed in the future to the affected funds. Further details
regarding the IDC Plan and distributions thereunder are available on Invesco's
Web site, available at http://www.invesco.com/us.

     On August 30, 2005, the West Virginia Office of the State Auditor -
Securities Commission (WVASC) issued a Summary Order to Cease and Desist and
Notice of Right to Hearing to Invesco and Invesco Distributors (collectively,
Invesco) (Order No. 05-1318). The WVASC made findings of fact that Invesco
allegedly entered into certain arrangements permitting market timing of the
Invesco Funds and failed to disclose these arrangements in the prospectuses for
such Funds, and conclusions of law to the effect that Invesco violated the West
Virginia securities laws. The WVASC ordered Invesco to cease any further
violations and sought to impose monetary sanctions, including restitution to
affected investors, disgorgement of fees, reimbursement of investigatory,
administrative and legal costs and an "administrative assessment" to be
determined by the Commissioner. Invesco is not aware of any further efforts by
WVASC to pursue the prosecution of this matter. Invesco settled all other
regulatory investigations related to market timing, resulting in: 1) affected
shareholders receiving restitution; 2) Invesco paying disgorgement and civil
penalties; and 3) Invesco taking remedial actions to prevent market timing.
Accordingly, Invesco considers this matter resolved.

OTHER ACTIONS INVOLVING INVESCO VAN KAMPEN TRUST FOR INVESTMENT GRADE NEW YORK
MUNICIPALS

The Trust received a shareholder demand letter dated March 25, 2011, from one of
the Trust's shareholders, alleging that the Board and the officers of the Trust
breached their fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty and wasted Trust assets by
causing the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARPS) at their
liquidation value. Specifically, the shareholder claims that the Board and
officers had no obligation to provide liquidity to the ARPS shareholders, the
redemptions were improperly motivated to benefit the prior adviser by preserving
business relationships with the ARPS holders, i.e., institutional investors, and
the market value and fair value of the ARPS were less than par at the time they
were redeemed. The letter alleges that the redemption of the ARPS occurred at
the expense of the Trust and its common shareholders. The letter demands that:
1) the Board take action against the prior adviser and trustees/officers to
recover damages; 2) the Board refrain from authorizing further redemptions or

                                       1

<PAGE>

                                                                    SUB-ITEM 77E

repurchases of ARPS by the Trust at prices in excess of fair value or market
value at the time of the transaction; and 3) if the Trust does not commence
appropriate action, the shareholder will commence a shareholder derivative
action on behalf of the Trust. The Board has formed a Special Litigation
Committee (SLC) to investigate these claims and make a recommendation to the
Board regarding whether maintenance of these claims is in the best interests of
the Trust. After reviewing the findings of the SLC's evaluation of the claims,
the Board announced on July 12, 2011, that it adopted the SLC's recommendation
and voted to reject the demands.

At the present time, management of Invesco and the Invesco Funds are unable to
estimate the impact, if any, that the outcome of the matters described herein
may have on Invesco, Invesco Distributors or the Invesco Funds.

                                       2
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
