Legal Proceedings	9 Months Ended
Legal Proceedings	Sep. 30, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Legal Proceedings	Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company may be involved as a defendant in legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company has adequate legal defense on all legal actions, and the results of any such proceedings would not materially impact the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. The Company provides disclosure and records loss contingencies in accordance with the loss contingencies accounting guidance. In accordance with such guidance, the Company establishes accruals for such matters when potential losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, the Company discloses the possible loss in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. California Labor Actions On March 30, 2023, Paul Lowe v. Rapid Reliable Testing, LLC, et al. was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Lowe Action”). The complaint alleges various wage and hour claims on behalf of the plaintiff and a putative class. The complaint also alleges a derivative class claim for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law and seeks to bring a representative action pursuant to California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). In addition, Corielyn Marie Hall v. Rapid Reliable Testing, LLC, et al. involves two separate actions filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court by plaintiff Corielyn Hall (collectively with the Lowe Action, the “California Labor Actions”). The first action is a class complaint filed on December 14, 2023. Similar to the Lowe Action, it alleges various wage and hour claims on behalf of the plaintiff and a putative class and asserts a derivative class claim for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law. The second action brought by Corielyn Hall was filed on February 20, 2024 and brings claims under PAGA. At the time of this filing, the Company is participating in early mediation with the plaintiffs in the California Labor Actions. Given the overlapping claims and time periods presented in the California Labor Actions, these actions will be mediated concurrently in an effort to reach a global resolution. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to the claims alleged in California Labor Actions. Due to the early stage of these proceedings, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims if they cannot be resolved during mediation. Stockholder Actions On October 27, 2023, Joe Naclerio, individually and purportedly on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a putative class action complaint for violation of federal securities laws in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, its then-Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, another former Chief Executive Officer, current Chief Financial Officer and former Chief Financial Officer (who currently serves as Executive Vice President of Strategy). On January 17, 2024, the Court appointed the Genesee County Employees’ Retirement System as the Lead Plaintiff. On March 18, 2024, the Lead Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company, its now former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, another former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer (who currently serves as Executive Vice President of Strategy). On June 21, 2024, the defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. The motion was fully briefed in September 2024. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any. The Company disputes the allegations of wrongdoing and intends to defend itself vigorously in this matter. On May 30, 2024 and on July 15, 2024, two purported shareholder derivative actions were filed against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company. The Company is named as a nominal defendant in both actions, and the complaints name the Company’s current board of directors, including its Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel, along with two former Chief Executive Officers, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and its Executive Vice President of Strategy. These actions were filed by Ryne Shetterly in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Shetterly Action”), and Salma Daboul in the Supreme Court for the State of New York (the “Daboul Action”). Both actions purport to assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty and other related claims on behalf of the Company. Both assert factual allegations substantially similar to those asserted in the securities class action matter discussed above, seeking various forms of monetary and injunctive relief. On August 29, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order to transfer the Shetterly Action to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. At the time of this filing, no defendants have been served in the Shetterly Action. On September 6, 2024, the plaintiff in the Daboul Action voluntarily discontinued the action. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims. Cybersecurity Action On August 22, 2024, Maria Ballesteros, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed a complaint against Ambulnz NY, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company (“Ambulnz NY”), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York arising from a data security incident that the Company experienced in April 2024 (the “Cybersecurity Action”). The Cybersecurity Action alleges negligence, negligence per se, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of implied contract and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, the California Privacy Act and the California Consumer Records Act, and seeks various forms of monetary and injunctive relief. At the time of this filing, Ambulnz NY still has time to respond to the complaint and is participating in early mediation with the plaintiff. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any. The Company maintains cybersecurity insurance coverage to limit its exposure to losses relating to cybersecurity incidents, including costs arising from litigation such as the Cybersecurity Action. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims if they cannot be resolved during mediation.