XML 24 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Anika Securities, Inc. (a Massachusetts Securities Corporation), and Anika Therapeutics S.r.l. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is the Euro. Assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiary are translated using the exchange rate existing on each respective balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using the monthly average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year. The translation adjustments resulting from this process are included as a component of accumulated currency translation adjustment which resulted in a loss from foreign currency translation of
$0.7
million,
$2.2
million, and
$2.8
million for the years ended
December
31,
2016,
2015,
and
2014,
respectively.
 
The Company recognized a loss from foreign currency transactions of
$0.3
million,
$0.4
million, and
$0.6
million during the years ended
December
31,
2016,
2015,
and
2014,
respectively.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of non-performance. The accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
 
A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Three levels of inputs that
may
be used to measure fair value are:
  
Level
1
– Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level
1
instruments include securities traded on active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
 
Level
2
– Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are directly observable in the market.
 
Level
3
– Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions market participants would use in pricing the instrument.
 
The Company’s financial assets have been classified as Level 
2.
The Company’s financial assets (which include cash equivalents and investments) have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of each reporting period, utilizing
third
party pricing services or other market observable data.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, management specifically analyzes individual accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic conditions, accounts receivable aging trends, and changes in the Company’s customer payment terms. A summary of activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
 
    December 31,
    2016   2015   2014
Balance, beginning of the year   $
167
    $
147
    $
593
 
Amounts provided    
52
     
38
     
-
 
Amounts written off    
(16
)    
(3
)    
(377
)
Translation adjustments    
(9
)    
(15
)    
(69
)
Balance, end of the year   $
194
    $
167
    $
147
 
 
Revenue Recognition - General
 
The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, risk of loss has passed or services have been rendered, the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection from the customer is reasonably assured.
 
Product Revenue
 
Revenues from product sales are recognized when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, which is typically upon shipment to the customer. Amounts billed or collected prior to recognition of revenue are classified as deferred revenue. When determining whether risk of loss has transferred to customers on product sales, or if the sales price is fixed or determinable, the Company evaluates both the contractual terms and conditions of its distribution and supply agreements as well as its business practices.
 
Product revenue also includes royalties. Royalty revenue is based on distributors’ sales and recognized in the same period distributors record their sale of products manufactured by the Company. On a quarterly basis the Company records royalty revenue based upon sales provided to it by its distributor customers.
 
Pursuant to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of
2010,
in conjunction with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a medical device excise tax (“MDET”) became effective on
January
1,
2013
for sales of certain medical devices. Some of the Company’s product sales are subject to the provisions of the MDET. The Company has elected to recognize any amounts related to the MDET under the gross method as allowed under ASC
605
-
45.
For the periods ended
December
31,
2015
and
2014,
amounts included in revenues and costs of goods sold for the MDET were immaterial. On
December
18,
2015,
President Obama signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2016,
which suspends the
2.3
percent MDET beginning on
January
1,
2016,
with the suspension ending on
December
31,
2017.
 
Licensing, Milestone and Contract Revenue
 
Licensing, milestone and contract revenue consist of revenue recognized on initial and milestone payments, as well as contractual amounts received from partners. The Company’s business strategy includes entering into collaborative license, development, and/or supply agreements with partners for the development and commercialization of the Company’s products. Under the milestone method, the Company recognizes a consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following criteria:
 
1.
The consideration is commensurate with either the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone,
 
2.
The consideration relates solely to past performance, and
 
3.
The consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement.
 
A milestone is defined as an event (i) that can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity’s performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance, (ii) for which there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved, and (iii) that would result in additional payments being due to the Company. Non substantive milestones are recognized when there are no further obligations by the Company.
 
The terms of the agreements typically include non-refundable license fees, funding of research and development and payments based upon achievement of certain milestones. The Company adopted ASU
2009
-
13,
Revenue Recognition
in
January
2011,
which amends ASC Subtopic
605
-
25,
Multiple Element Arrangements
(“ASC
605
-
25”)
to require the establishment of a selling price hierarchy for determining the allocable selling price of an item. Under ASC
605
-
25,
as amended by ASU
2009
-
13,
in order to account for an element as a separate unit of accounting, the element must have objective and reliable evidence of selling price of the undelivered elements. In general, non-refundable up-front fees and milestone payments that do not relate to other elements are recognized as revenue over the term of the arrangement as the Company completes its performance obligations.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company
considers only those investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible to cash, and that mature within
three
months from date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds and bank certificates of deposit with an original maturity of less than
90
days.
 
Investments
 
The Company’s investments consist of bank certificates of deposit with an original maturity of more than
90
days. The Company has designated all investments as available-for-sale, and therefore such investments are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. For securities sold prior to maturity, the cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are recorded in interest income, net. Interest is recorded when earned. Investments with original maturities greater than approximately
three
months and remaining maturities less than
one
year are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining maturities greater than
one
year are classified as long-term investments. The Company considers securities with maturities of
three
months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents.
 
All of the Company’s investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. The Company recognizes an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the extent and length of time the investment's fair value has been lower than its cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, extent of the loss related to credit of the issuer, the expected cash flows from the security, the Company’s intent to sell the security, and whether or not the Company will be required to sell the security prior the expected recovery of the investment's amortized cost basis. During the years ended 
December
 
31,
2016
and
2015,
the Company did not record any other-than-temporary impairment charges on its available-for-sale securities because the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
 
The Company has no significant off-balance sheet risks related to foreign exchange contracts, option contracts, or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company’s cash equivalents and investments are held with
two
major international financial institutions.
 
The Company, by policy, routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers. As a result, the Company believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure is limited.
 
As of
December
 
31,
2016
and
2015,
DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine (“Mitek”), represented
66%
and
60%,
respectively, of the Company’s accounts receivable balance, no other single customer accounted for more than
10%
of accounts receivable in either period.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using the
first
-in,
first
-out method. Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Inventory costs associated with product candidates that have not yet received regulatory approval are capitalized if the Company believes there is probable future commercial use and future economic benefit.
 
The Company’s policy is to write-down inventory when conditions exist that suggest inventory
may
be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for the Company’s products and market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of inventory based on a combination of factors including, but not limited to, historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, and estimated current or future market values. Purchasing requirements and alternative usage avenues are explored within these processes to mitigate inventory exposure.
 
When recorded, inventory write-downs are intended to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. Inventory
of
$16.0
million
and
$14.9
million as of
December
31,
2016
and
2015,
respectively, is stated net of inventory reserves of approximately
$0.9
million and
$0.9
million, respectively. If actual demand for the Company’s products deteriorates, or if market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional inventory write-downs
may
be required.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Equipment and software are typically amortized over
two
to
ten
years, and furniture and fixtures over
five
to
seven
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the remaining terms of the related leases. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred; additions and improvements are capitalized. When an item is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation is relieved, and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income. Construction-in-process is stated at cost, which includes the cost of construction and other direct costs attributable to the construction. Construction-in-process is not depreciated until such time as the relevant assets are completed and put into use. Construction-in-process at
December
31,
2016
and
2015
primarily represents the costs of machinery and equipment under installation.
 
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill is the amount by which the purchase price of acquired net assets in a business combination exceeded the fair values of net identifiable assets on the date of acquisition. Acquired IPR&D represents the fair value assigned to research and development assets that the Company acquires that have not been completed at the date of acquisition or are pending regulatory approval in certain jurisdictions. The value assigned to the acquired IPR&D is determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting revenue from the projects, and discounting the net cash flows to present value.
 
Goodwill and IPR&D are evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Factors the Company considers important, on an overall company basis, that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the Company’s use of the acquired assets or the strategy for its overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period, or a reduction of its market capitalization relative to net book value.
 
To conduct impairment tests of goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company’s annual assessment for impairment of goodwill as of
November
30,
2016
indicated that the fair value of its reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit.
 
To conduct impairment tests of IPR&D, the fair value of the IPR&D project is compared to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of the IPR&D project exceeds its fair value. The Company estimates the fair value for IPR&D projects using discounted cash flow valuation models, which require the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including but not limited to, estimating the timing of and expected costs to complete the in-process projects, projecting regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows from product sales resulting from completed projects and in-process projects, and developing appropriate discount rates.
During the
fourth
quarter of
2015,
the Company performed an impairment review of its IPR&D projects as it reassessed its research and development strategy. The Company recorded an impairment charge of
$0.7
million due to the decision to discontinue further development efforts needed to commercialize the Hemostatic Patch in-process development project.
The Company’s annual assessment for impairment of IPR&D indicated that the fair value of its other IPR&D assets as of
November
30,
2016
exceeded their respective carrying values.
  
Long-Lived Assets
 
Long-lived assets primarily include property and equipment, and intangible assets with finite lives. The Company’s intangible assets are comprised of purchased developed technologies, distributor relationships, patents and trade names. These intangible assets are carried at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the intangible assets' useful lives, which range from approximately
five
 to 
sixteen
 years. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets
may
not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of those assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
 
Research and Development
 
Research and development costs consist primarily of clinical trials, salaries and related expenses for personnel, and fees paid to outside consultants and outside service providers, including costs associated with licensing, milestone and contract revenue. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company has stock-based compensation plans under which various types of equity-based awards are granted, including restricted stock units (“RSUs”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), performance units, and stock options. The Company measures the compensation cost of award recipients’ services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the underlying award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. See Note 
12
for a description of the types of stock-based awards granted, the compensation expense related to such awards, and detail of equity-based awards outstanding.
 
For performance-based awards with financial achievement targets, the Company recognizes expense using the graded vesting methodology based on the number of shares expected to vest. Compensation cost associated with these grants was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation method multiplied by the expected number of shares to be issued, which is adjusted based on the estimated probabilities of achieving the performance goals. Changes to the probability assessment and the estimated shares expected to vest will result in adjustments to the related share-based compensation expense that will be recorded in the period of the change. If the performance targets are not achieved, no compensation cost is recognized, and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company recorded approximately
$0.3
million and
$0.4
million related to performance-based awards in
2016
and
2015,
respectively. There was no expense recognized on performance based awards in
2014
as satisfaction of the performance conditions were not considered probable.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company’s income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes. Certain items of income and expense are not reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effects of these timing differences are reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of deductible temporary differences, tax operating losses, and tax credit carry-forwards (including investment tax credits). Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent it believes that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company establishes a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the appropriate valuation. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or increases or decreases this allowance in a given period, it includes the related tax expense or tax benefit within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations in that period.
 
Comprehensive Income
 
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive loss, which includes foreign currency translation adjustments. For the purposes of comprehensive income disclosures, the Company does not record tax provisions or benefits for the net changes in the foreign currency translation adjustment, as it intends to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiary. Accumulated other comprehensive loss is reported as a component of stockholders' equity.
 
Segment Information
 
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. Based on the criteria established by ASC
280,
Segment Reportin
g, the Company has
one
reportable operating segment, the results of which are disclosed in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
Contingencies
 
In the normal course of business, we are involved in various legal proceedings and other matters such as contractual disputes, which are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict. We record accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that we conclude that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated. We consider all relevant factors when making assessments regarding these contingencies. Although the outcomes of these other legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, the Company does not expect the resolution of these other legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.
 
Subsequent Events
 
Events occurring subsequent to
December
 
31,
2016
have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements. See Note
11,
Commitments and Contingencies
, to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the
February
2,
2017
lease extension of the Company’s headquarters facility located in Bedford, Massachusetts.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recently Issued
 
In
May
2014,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU
2014
-
09
supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Topic
605,
Revenue Recognition” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
In
July
2015,
the FASB issued a deferral of ASU
2014
-
09
of
one
year making it effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after
December
15,
2017
while also providing for early adoption not to occur before the original effective date. The Company is assessing the appropriate method for implementing ASU
2014
-
09,
as well as the impact the adoption of ASU
2014
-
09
will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
 
In
February
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842).
ASU
2016
-
02
amends existing leasing accounting requirements. The most significant change will result in the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for virtually all leases. The new guidance will also require significant additional disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. ASU
2016
-
02
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December
15,
2018.
Upon adoption, entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted, and a number of optional practical expedients
may
be elected to simplify the impact of adoption. The Company is assessing ASU
2016
-
02
and the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
  
In
March
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
09,
Compensation (Topic
718)
Stock Compensation. ASU
2016
-
09
identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. ASU
2016
-
09
is effective as of
January
1,
2017.
The Company is assessing ASU
2016
-
09
and the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.
 
In
June
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments (Topic
326)
Credit Losses. ASU
2016
-
13
changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Under the new standard, entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income are to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. An allowance for credit losses will be a valuation account that will be deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. ASU
2016
-
13
is effective as of
January
1,
2020.
Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or footnote disclosures.
 
Recently Adopted
 
In
August
2014,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2014
-
15,
 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU
2014
-
15
defines management’s responsibility to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern at each annual and interim reporting period, and requires additional disclosures in certain circumstances. This guidance is effective for the annual period ending after
December
15,
2016,
and for annual and interim periods thereafter. The Company adopted the new standard in the
fourth
quarter and performed the required assessment. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s disclosures. The Company believe that we have adequate financial resources to support our business for at least the
twelve
months from the issuance date of our financial statements.
 
In
July
2015,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2015
-
11,
 Inventory (Topic
330)
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU
2015
-
11
more closely aligns the measurement of inventory in US GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards by requiring companies using the
first
-in,
first
-out and average costs methods to measure inventory using the lower of standard cost and net realizable value, where net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The provisions of ASU
2015
-
11
are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December
15,
2016.
ASU
2015
-
11
should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company adopted this standard for the interim reporting period ended
March
31,
2016.
The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.