XML 29 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 14 - Income Taxes
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]
14.
          Income Taxes
 
Provisions for income taxes were
$2.6
million and
$3.9
million for the
three
-month periods ended
March
31,
2017
and
2016,
respectively, based on effective tax rates of
31.9%
and
36.1%.
  The decrease in income taxes for the
three
-month period ended
March
31,
2017
resulted from lower income before income taxes as compared to the same period in the prior year along with the decrease in the effective tax rate. The net decrease in the effective tax rate
for the
three
-month period ended
March
31,
2017,
as compared to the same period in
2016,
was primarily due to the increase in the expected research and development and state investment tax credits.  In addition, the Company realized windfall tax benefits related to share-based payments in connection with the adoption of ASU
2016
-
09
during the period. The amount of excess tax benefits recognized as a discrete period income tax benefit was
$0.3
million which decreased the effective tax rate for the interim period by
4.0%.
 
The Company files income tax returns in the United States on a federal basis, in certain U.S. states, and in Italy. The associated tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. Substantially all of the Company’s filings from
2013
through the present tax year remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other taxing authorities for U.S. federal and state tax purposes. The Company’s
2014
filing has been audited by the IRS and closed. The Company’s filings from
2011
 through the present tax year remain subject to examination by the appropriate governmental authorities in Italy. The Company’s
2012
filing has been audited by the Italian tax authorities and closed.
 
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements, the Company performed an analysis to ascertain if it was more likely than not that it would be able to utilize, in future periods, the net deferred tax assets associated with its net operating loss carry-forward. The Company has concluded that the positive evidence outweighs the negative evidence and, thus, that the deferred tax assets not otherwise subject to a valuation allowance are realizable on a “more likely than not” basis. As such, the Company has did not record a valuation allowance at
March
31,
2017
or
December
31,
2016.