XML 19 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.3
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2023
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

7. Fair Value Measurements:

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, amounts due from/to related parties and trade accounts payable: The carrying values reported in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheets for those financial instruments (except for the fair value of non-current portion of amounts due from related party) are considered Level 1 items as they represent liquid assets and liabilities with short-term maturities and are reasonable estimates of their fair values. The carrying value of these instruments is separately reflected in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheets. The fair value of the non-current portion of the amounts due from related parties, determined through Level 3 inputs of the fair value hierarchy by discounting future cash flows using the Partnership’s estimated cost of capital, is $810 as of June 30, 2023, compared to its carrying value of $1,350 as of the same date.
Long-term debt: The $675 Million Credit Facility discussed in Note 6 has an approximate recorded value due to the variable interest rate payable and is thus considered a Level 2 item in accordance with the fair value hierarchy as SOFR rates are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the loans. The fair value of the $675 Million Credit Facility approximates its recorded value, due to its variable interest rates.
Derivative financial instrument: The carrying values reported in the consolidated condensed balance sheets for the swap transaction are determined through Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are derived principally from interest rates, yield curves, and other items that allow value to be determined.

7. Fair Value Measurements (continued):

A fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value has been established by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the determination of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table summarizes the hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of assets and liabilities by valuation technique on a recurring basis as of the valuation date.

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

June 30,

December 31,

Recurring measurements:

    

2023

    

2022

Interest rate swaps

$

28,283

$

34,877