XML 23 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v2.4.0.6

Regulatory and Operational Matters | 12 Months Ended
--- | ---
Dec. 31, 2011
Regulatory and Operational Matters [Abstract] |
Regulatory and Operational Matters | Note 16. Regulatory and Operational Matters The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory—and possibly additional discretionary—actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2011 the Company and the Bank are categorized as “well capitalized” for these purposes. In addition, due to the Bank’s asset profile and current economic conditions in its markets, the Bank’s capital plan pursuant to the Agreement described below does target a minimum 9% Tier 1 leverage capital ratio. The most recent notification from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since then that management believes have changed the Bank’s classification. In February 2009 the Bank entered into a formal written agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Bank has appointed a Compliance Committee of outside directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee must report quarterly to the Board of Directors and to the OCC on the Bank’s progress in complying with the Agreement. The Agreement requires the Bank to review, adopt and implement a number of policies and programs related to credit and operational issues. The Agreement further provides for certain asset growth restrictions for a limited period of time together with limitations on the acceptance of certain brokered deposits and the extension of credit to borrowers whose loans are criticized. The Bank may pay dividends during the term of the Agreement only with prior written permission from the OCC. The Agreement also requires that the Bank develop and implement a three-year capital plan. The Bank has taken or put into process many of the steps required by the Agreement, and does not anticipate that the restrictions included within the Agreement will impair its current business plan. In June 2010 the company entered into a formal written agreement (the “Reserve Bank Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Reserve Bank”). Under the terms of the Reserve Bank Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company are required to take appropriate steps to fully utilize the Company’s financial and managerial resources to serve as a source of strength to the Bank including taking steps to insure that the Bank complies with the Agreement with the OCC. The Reserve Bank Agreement requires the Company to submit, adopt and implement a capital plan that is acceptable to the Reserve Bank. The Company must also report to the Reserve Bank quarterly on the Company’s progress in complying with the Reserve Bank Agreement. The Agreement further provides for certain restrictions on the payment or receipt of dividends, distributions of interest or principal on subordinate debentures or trust preferred securities and the Company’s ability to incur debt or to purchase or redeem its stock without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank. The Company has taken or put into process many of the steps required by the Reserve Bank Agreement, and does not anticipate that the restrictions included within the Reserve Bank Agreement will impair its current business plan. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were (dollars in thousands):
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | To Be Well |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Capitalized Under |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | For Capital |  |  | Prompt Corrective |
|  | Actual |  |  | Adequacy Purposes |  |  | Action Provisions |
2011 |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |  |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |  |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |
The Company: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  | $ | 63,658 |  |  |  | 15.22 | % |  | $ | 33,469 |  |  |  | 8.00 | % |  | $ | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  |  | 58,377 |  |  |  | 13.95 | % |  |  | 16,735 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |  |  | 58,377 |  |  |  | 9.01 | % |  |  | 25,931 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
The Bank: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  | $ | 61,616 |  |  |  | 14.75 | % |  | $ | 33,445 |  |  |  | 8.00 | % |  | $ | 41,806 |  |  |  | 10.00 | %
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  |  | 56,339 |  |  |  | 13.48 | % |  |  | 16,722 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 25,084 |  |  |  | 6.00 | %
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |  |  | 56,339 |  |  |  | 8.69 | % |  |  | 25,929 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 32,411 |  |  |  | 5.00 | %
|  | Actual |  |  | For Capital Adequacy Purposes |  |  | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
2010 |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |  |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |  |  | Amount |  |  | Ratio |
The Company: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  | $ | 80,358 |  |  |  | 17.08 | % |  | $ | 37,643 |  |  |  | 8.00 | % |  | $ | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  |  | 73,822 |  |  |  | 15.69 | % |  |  | 18,822 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |  |  | 73,822 |  |  |  | 9.16 | % |  |  | 32,219 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |
The Bank: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  | $ | 77,705 |  |  |  | 16.54 | % |  | $ | 37,582 |  |  |  | 8.00 | % |  | $ | 46,978 |  |  |  | 10.00 | %
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |  |  | 71,178 |  |  |  | 15.15 | % |  |  | 18,791 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 28,187 |  |  |  | 6.00 | %
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |  |  | 71,178 |  |  |  | 8.84 | % |  |  | 32,203 |  |  |  | 4.00 | % |  |  | 40,253 |  |  |  | 5.00 | %
On October 15, 2010, the Company issued and sold to PNBK Holdings LLC, 33,600,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share. The shares sold to PNBK Holdings LLC represent 87.6% of the Company’s current issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the additional capital, the Bank’s capital ratios increased significantly and helped return it to a “well capitalized” classification under the regulatory framework for prompt correction action. Another factor of this transaction is that the Company has a new Chairman of the Board of Directors, as well as a new President and CEO. These changes to management are key components to the recovery plan and will help the Bank reach its goal of restored profitability. Restrictions on dividends, loans and advances The Company’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. Pursuant to the February 9, 2009 Agreement between the Bank and the OCC, the Bank can pay dividends to the Company only pursuant to a dividend policy requiring compliance with the Bank’s OCC-approved capital program, in compliance with applicable law and with the prior written determination of no supervisory objection by the Assistant Deputy Comptroller. In addition to the Agreement, certain other restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. The approval of the OCC is required to pay dividends in excess of the Bank’s earnings retained in the current year plus retained net earnings for the preceding two years. As of December 31, 2011, the Bank had an accumulated deficit; therefore, dividends may not be paid to the Company. The Bank is also prohibited from paying dividends that would reduce its capital ratios below minimum regulatory requirements. The Company’s ability to pay dividends and incur debt is also restricted by the Reserve Bank Agreement. Under the terms of the Reserve Bank Agreement, the Company has agreed that it shall not declare or pay any dividends or incur, increase or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation (the “Director”) of the Board of Governors. Loans or advances to the Company from the Bank are limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus on a secured basis. Recent Legislative Developments The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Act”) was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act is a significant piece of legislation that will continue to have a major impact on the financial services industry, including the organization, financial condition and operations of banks and bank holding companies. Management continues to evaluate the impact of the Act; however, uncertainty remains as to its operational impact, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Many of the provisions of the Act are aimed at financial institutions that are significantly larger than the Company and the Bank. Notwithstanding this, there are many other provisions that the Company and the Bank are subject to and will have to comply with, including any new rules applicable to the Company and the Bank promulgated by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, a new regulatory body dedicated to consumer protection. As rules and regulations are promulgated by the agencies responsible for implementing and enforcing the Act, the Company and the Bank will have to address each to ensure compliance with applicable provisions of the Act and compliance costs are expected to increase. The Dodd-Frank Act broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Under rules issued by the FDIC in February 2011, the base for insurance assessments changed from domestic deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity. Assessment rates are calculated using formulas that take into account the risks of the institution being assessed. The rule was effective beginning April 1, 2011. This did not have a material impact on the Company. On June 28, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board approved a final debit-card interchange rule. This primarily impacts larger banks and should not have a material impact on the Company. It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on the Company. The financial reform legislation and any implementing rules that are ultimately issued could have adverse implications on the financial industry, the competitive environment, and our ability to conduct business. Management will have to apply resources to ensure compliance with all applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and any implementing rules, which may increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our earnings.

X
- Details
Name: | pnbk_RegulatoryAndOperationalMattersAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | pnbk_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Regulatory and Operational Matters + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | pnbk_RegulatoryAndOperationalMattersTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | pnbk_
Data Type: | nonnum:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration