Income Taxes	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	Note 6: Income Taxes The determination of the amount of deferred income tax assets which are more likely than not to be realized is primarily dependent on projections of future earnings, which are subject to uncertainty and estimates that may change given economic conditions and other factors. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. The deferred tax position has been affected by several significant transactions in prior years. These transactions include provision for loan losses, the levels of non-accrual loans and other-than-temporary impairment write-offs of certain investments, as well as a loss on the bulk sale of loans in 2011. As a result, the Company was in a cumulative net loss position in 2011 and under the applicable accounting guidance, had concluded that it was not more-likely-than-not that the Company would be able to realize its deferred tax assets and, accordingly, had established a full valuation allowance totaling $14.4 million against the deferred tax asset balance remaining after the IRC 382 write-down (see below). As measured under the rules of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Company has undergone a greater than 50% change of ownership in 2010. Consequently, use of the Company’s net operating loss carry forward and certain built in deductions available against future taxable income in any one year are limited. The maximum amount of carry forwards available in a given year is limited to the product of the Company’s fair market value on the date of ownership change and the federal long-term tax-exempt rate, plus any limited carry forward not utilized in prior years. The Company analyzed the impact of its ownership change in 2010 and calculated the annual limitation under IRC 382 to be $284,000. Based on the analysis, the Company had determined that the pre-change net operating losses and net unrealized built-in deductions were approximately $36.2 million. Based on a 20 year carry forward period, the Company could utilize approximately $5.6 million of the pre-change net operating losses and built-in deductions. Therefore, the Company wrote-off approximately $10.4 million of deferred tax assets in 2011. Accordingly, the write-off of the deferred tax asset did not affect the consolidated financial statements as there was a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position of the Company at March 31, 2014. The valuation allowance is analyzed quarterly for changes affecting the deferred tax asset. At March 31, 2014, the company reported taxable income for the second consecutive quarter. However, based on current accounting guidance the Company has not generated taxable income for a sufficient length of time in order to reverse the DTA valuation allowance and, accordingly, had an allowance totaling $17.8 million at March 31, 2014. In the future, when the Company has generated taxable income on a more sustained basis, management’s conclusion regarding the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance could change, resulting in the reversal of all or a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

Note 6: Income Taxes

The determination of the amount of deferred income tax assets which are more likely than not to be realized is primarily dependent on projections of future earnings, which are subject to uncertainty and estimates that may change given economic conditions and other factors. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. The deferred tax position has been affected by several significant transactions in prior years. These transactions include provision for loan losses, the levels of non-accrual loans and other-than-temporary impairment write-offs of certain investments, as well as a loss on the bulk sale of loans in 2011. As a result, the Company was in a cumulative net loss position in 2011 and under the applicable accounting guidance, had concluded that it was not more-likely-than-not that the Company would be able to realize its deferred tax assets and, accordingly, had established a full valuation allowance totaling $14.4 million against the deferred tax asset balance remaining after the IRC 382 write-down (see below).

As measured under the rules of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Company has undergone a greater than 50% change of ownership in 2010. Consequently, use of the Company’s net operating loss carry forward and certain built in deductions available against future taxable income in any one year are limited. The maximum amount of carry forwards available in a given year is limited to the product of the Company’s fair market value on the date of ownership change and the federal long-term tax-exempt rate, plus any limited carry forward not utilized in prior years.

The Company analyzed the impact of its ownership change in 2010 and calculated the annual limitation under IRC 382 to be $284,000. Based on the analysis, the Company had determined that the pre-change net operating losses and net unrealized built-in deductions were approximately $36.2 million. Based on a 20 year carry forward period, the Company could utilize approximately $5.6 million of the pre-change net operating losses and built-in deductions. Therefore, the Company wrote-off approximately $10.4 million of deferred tax assets in 2011. Accordingly, the write-off of the deferred tax asset did not affect the consolidated financial statements as there was a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.

Management has reviewed the deferred tax position of the Company at March 31, 2014. The valuation allowance is analyzed quarterly for changes affecting the deferred tax asset. At March 31, 2014, the company reported taxable income for the second consecutive quarter. However, based on current accounting guidance the Company has not generated taxable income for a sufficient length of time in order to reverse the DTA valuation allowance and, accordingly, had an allowance totaling $17.8 million at March 31, 2014. In the future, when the Company has generated taxable income on a more sustained basis, management’s conclusion regarding the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance could change, resulting in the reversal of all or a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.