Exhibit EX-99.1

Notice to Reader of the Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011

In accordance with National Instrument 51-102, of the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Company discloses that its auditors have not reviewed the unaudited interim financial statements.

The unaudited interim financial statements of North American Nickel Inc. (the “Company”) for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 (“Financial Statements’) have been prepared by management. The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are available at the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. The Financial Statements are stated in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated, and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).


NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC.
Condensed Interim Statement of Financial Position
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars - unaudited))
			June 30,			December 31,
	Notes		2011			2010
						(Note 16)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash		4	$	3,093,712		$	659,227
Marketable securities				-		—
Receivables		5		64,937			26,965
Prepaid expenses and deposits				8,996		—

Total current assets				3,167,645			686,192

Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment		6		6,155		—
Exploration and evaluation assets		7		1,132,374			677,718

Total non-current assets				1,138,529			677,718

Total assets			$	4,306,174		$	1,363,910

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade payables and accrued liabilities		8	$	93,747		$	129,527
Total current liabilities				93,747			129,527

Non-current liabilities
Taxes payable				704
Future income tax liability		11		107,427		—

Total non-current liabilities				108,131		—

Total liabilities				201,878			129,527
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share capital — preferred		9c		604,724			604,724
Share capital — common		9b		17,766,526			14,705,609
Contributed surplus		9b		316,842			182,500
Accumulated other comprehensive loss/income				-		—
Deficit				(14,583,796	)		(14,258,450	)

Total shareholders’ equity				4,104,296			1,234,383

Total equity				4,104,296			1,234,383
Total liabilities and equity			$	4,306,174		$	1,363,910

APPROVED BY THE DIRECTORS:


NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC.
Condensed Interim Statement of Comprehensive Loss/Income
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars - unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
		2011			2010			2011			2010
Notes					(Note 16)						(Note 16)

Expenses
					$						$
Amortization		$	324			—		$	345			—
Consulting	10		19,358			24,075			25,273			24,075
Filing fees			45,277			18,366			46,679			18,366
Investor relation			10,334			9,408			12,204			9,408
General and administrative			3,536			37,578			8,405			44,719
Management fees	10		27,000			16,000			54,000			16,000
Part X11.6 tax			704			—			704			—
Professional fees			63,721			68,359			74,150			68,359
Property investigation			3,850			1,450			3,850			1,450
Salaries			10,866			5,000			22,020			5,000
Stock-based compensation			97,750			—			97,750			—
Travel and accommodation			8,343			—			8,343			—

Loss before other items			(291,062	)		(180,236	)		(353,722	)		(187,377	)
Other items:
Impairment of mineral property and deferred exploration costs (Note 4)			—			(91,000	)		—			(91,000	)
Sale of investment gain/(loss)			—			94,534			—			96,749

Loss before income taxes			(291,062	)		(176,702	)		(353,722	)		(181,628	)
Future income tax recovery (expense)			28,376			—			28,376			—

Net loss for the period		$	(262,686	)	$	(176,702	)	$	(325,346	)	$	(181,628	)

Other comprehensive (loss) income
		$			$			$			$
Unrealized loss on marketable securities			—			—			—			—

Reversal of accumulated other comprehensive income upon sale of subsidiary			—			—			—			—

Total other comprehensive (loss) income			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive loss for the period		$	(262,686	)	$	(176,702	)	$	(325,346	)	$	(181,628	)

Loss per common share — basic and diluted		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
- basic and diluted			42,553,644			5,877,994			38,918,162			5,661,067

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements


NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC.
Condensed Interim Statement of Changes In Equity
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars - unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
	Number of shares		Share capital			Share Subscription			Contributed surplus		Accumulated other			Deficit			Total
											comprehensive loss

Balance at January 1, 2010		6,046,454	$	13,649,333		$	-		$	-	$	24,525		$	(13,728,642	)	$	(54,784	)
Loss for the six months		—		—			—			—		—			(181,628	)		(181,628	)
Share capital issued private placement		19,850,000		1,091,000			141,000			—		—			—			1,232,000
Reversal of accumulated other comprehensive income
upon sale of subsidiary		—		—			—			—		(2,616	)		—			(2,616	)
Available-for-sale investment		—		—			—			—		(21,909	)		—			(21,909	)

Balance at June 30, 2010		25,896,454		14,740,333			141,000			—		—			(13,910,270	)		971,063
Shares issued to acquire mineral properties		7,150,000		429,000			—			—		—			—			429,000
Shares issued for debt		2,640,000		132,000			—			—		—			—			132,000
Share capital issued private placement		150,000		9,000			(141,000	)		182,500		—			—			50,500
Loss for the six months		—		—			—			—		—			(348,180	)		(348,180	)

Balance at December 31, 2010		35,836,454		15,310,333			—			182,500		—			(14,258,450	)		1,234,383
Loss for the period		—		—			—			—		—			(325,346	)		(325,346	)
Share capital issued private placement		15,545,463		3,089,399			—			—		—			—			3,089,399
Shares issued to acquire mineral properties		950,000		57,000			—			—		—			—			57,000
Stock options issued		—		—			—			97,750		—			—			97,750
Warrants issued		—		—			—			36,592		—			—			36,592
Share issue costs		126,000		(85,482	)		—			—		—			—			(85,482	)

Balance at June 30, 2011		52,457,917	$	18,371,250		$	-		$	316,842	$	-		$	(14,583,796	)	$	4,104,296

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC.
Condensed Interim Statement of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars - unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
				Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period	$	(262,686	)	$	(176,702	)	$	(325,346	)	$	(181,628	)
Items not affecting cash
Sale of investment gain/(loss)		—			(65,665	)		—			(67,880	)
Amortization		324			—			345			—
Stock-based compensation		97,750			—			97,750			—
Future income tax recovery		(28,376	)		—			(28,376	)		—
Impairment of mineral properties and deferred
exploration costs		—			91,000			—			91,000

		(192,988	)		(151,367	)		(255,627	)		(158,508	)
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
Receivables		(30,985	)		(2,433	)		(37,972	)		(3,283	)
Prepaid expenses		(8,996	)		—			(8,996	)		—
Trade payables and accrued liabilities		(13,284	)		113,042			(8,269	)		105,905
Taxes payable		704						704
Due to related parties		(73,871	)		—			(27,511	)		—

Cash used in operating activities		(319,420	)		(40,758	)		(337,671	)		(55,886	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures on mineral properties and deferred exploration costs		(257,439	)		(121,152	)		(397,656	)		(121,152	)
Proceeds from sale of investment		—			52,606			—			52,606
Purchase of equipment		—			—			(6,500	)		—

Cash used in investing activities		(257,439	)		(68,546	)		(404,156	)		(68,546	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds on issuance of common shares		3,040,509			1,061,000			3,040,509			1,061,000
Future income tax liability		135,803			—			135,803			—
Cash used in financing activities		3,176,312			1,061,000			3,176,312			1,061,000

Total increase (decrease) in cash during the period		2,599,453			951,696			2,434,485			936,569
Cash at beginning of period		494,259			1,388			659,227			16,515
Cash at end of period	$	3,093,712		$	953,084		$	3,093,712		$	953,084

Cash paid for:
	$			$			$			$
Interest		—			—			—			—

	$			$			$			$
Income taxes		—			—			—			—

Supplemental cash flow information — (Note 14)

The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

North American Nickel Inc. (formerly Widescope Resources Inc.) (the“Company”) was incorporated on September 23, 1983, under the laws of the province of British Columbia, Canada. The head office, principal address and records office of the Company are located at Suite 301 – 260 West Esplanade, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7M 3G7.

The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and development of mineral properties in Canada. The Company has not yet determined whether these properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. The recoverability of amounts shown for mineral property costs is dependent upon a number of factors including environmental risk, legal and political risk, the existence of economically recoverable mineral reserves, confirmation of the Company’s interests in the underlying mineral claims, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete exploration and development, and to attain sufficient net cash flow from future profitable production or disposition proceeds.

On April 7, 2010, and effective May 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) whereby it agreed to sell its 65.42% interest in Outback Capital Inc. dba Pinefalls Gold (“PFG”), a private Alberta exploration company. On April 19, 2010, the Company changed its name from Widescope Resources Inc. to North American Nickel Inc., consolidated its common share capital on a 2:1 basis, whereby each two old shares were exchanged for one new share, and increased its authorized capital from 100,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value (Note 9). All references to common shares, stock options, warrants and weighted average number of shares outstanding in these consolidated financial statements retroactively reflect the share consolidation.

These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. The ability of the Company to continue operations as a going concern is ultimately dependent upon achieving profitable operations. To date, the Company has not generated profitable operations from its resource activities and will need to invest additional funds in carrying out its planned exploration, development and operational activities. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such, the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and cover administrative costs, the Company will use its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed. The Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire interests in additional properties if there is sufficient geologic or economic potential and if adequate financial resources are available to do so.

The condensed interim financial statements were authorized for issue on August 25, 2011 by the Board of Directors of the Company.

Statement of compliance and conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards

The consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Therefore, these financial statements comply with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 34 “Interim Financial Reporting”.

This interim financial report does not include all of the information required of a full annual financial report and is intended to provide users with an update in relation to events and transactions that are significant to an understanding of the changes in financial position and performance of the Company since the end of the last annual reporting period. It is therefore recommended that this financial report be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, this interim financial report, being the first six month IFRS financial report, provides selected significant disclosures that are required in the annual financial statements under IFRS. The disclosures concerning the transition from Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“Canadian GAAP”) to IFRS are provided in Note 16.

Basis of preparation
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis and are based on historical costs, modified where applicable. The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted, which is the Company’s functional currency.

Basis of consolidation
These interim financial statements ending June 30, 2011 include only the accounts of the Company and the comparative periods include the Company and the total operating activities of its 65.42% owned subsidiary, PFG, up to May 31, 2010, when PFG was sold. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Estimates, assumptions and measurement uncertainty
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual outcomes can differ from these estimates.

By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and the effect on the financial statements of changes in such estimates in future periods could be significant. Areas requiring significant use of estimates by management relate to going concern assessments, determining the carrying value and or impairment of mineral properties, determining the fair values of marketable securities and stock-based payments, asset retirement obligations, financial instruments and tax rates used to calculate future income tax balances.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures
Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in profit or loss.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures – cont’d
Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to mining property and development assets within property, plant and equipment.

Recoverability of the carrying amount of any exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

The Company may occasionally enter into farm-out arrangements, whereby the Company will transfer part of the mineral interest, as consideration, for an agreement by the farmee to meet certain exploration and evaluation expenditures which would have otherwise been undertaken by the Company. The Company does not record any expenditures made by the farmee on its behalf. Any cash consideration received from the agreement is credited against the costs previously capitalized to the mineral interest given up by the Company, with any excess cash accounted for as a gain on disposal.

When a project is deemed to no longer have commercially viable prospects to the Company, exploration and evaluation expenditures in respect of that project are deemed to be impaired. As a result, those exploration and evaluation expenditure costs, in excess of estimated recoveries, are written off to the statement of comprehensive loss/income.

Restoration and environmental obligations
The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflect the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. The restoration asset will be depreciated on the same basis as other mining assets.

The Company’s estimates of restoration costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to mining assets with a corresponding entry to the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of reclamation costs, are charged to profit and loss for the period.

The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to profit or loss in the period incurred.

Restoration and environmental obligations (cont’d)
The costs of restoration projects that were included in the provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The costs to prevent and control environmental impacts at specific properties are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets.

Impairment of assets
Impairment tests on intangible assets with indefinite useful economic lives are undertaken annually at the financial year-end. Other non-financial assets, including exploration and evaluation assets are subject to impairment tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Where the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell, the asset is written down accordingly.

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried out on the asset’s cash-generating unit, which is the lowest group of assets in which the asset belongs for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets.

An impairment loss is charged to the profit or loss, except to the extent they reverse gains previously recognized in other comprehensive loss/income.

The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

Financial assets are classified at fair value through profit or loss when they are either held for trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or when they are designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets.

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments, and it is the Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those which are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses.

Non-derivative financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date – the date on which the group commits to purchase the asset.

Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial instrument has been impaired. In the case of available-for-sale financial instruments, a significant and prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered to determine whether impairment has arisen.

Loss per share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shares of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the relevant period.

Diluted earnings / loss per common share is computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shares by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding and all additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive instruments were converted.

Income taxes
Income tax expense comprises of current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in net income except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive loss/income.

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income.

Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax is provided using the balance sheet method of temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Share-based payments
Where equity-settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to the statement of comprehensive loss/income over the vesting period. Performance vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognized over the vesting period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. Non-vesting conditions and market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether these vesting conditions are satisfied. The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition or where a non-vesting condition is not satisfied.

Where the terms and conditions of options are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of the options, measured immediately before and after the modification, is also charged to the statement of comprehensive loss/income over the remaining vesting period.

Where equity instruments are granted to employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the equity instrument granted at the grant date. The grant date fair value is recognized in comprehensive loss/income over the vesting period, described as the period during which all the vesting conditions are to be satisfied.

Where equity instruments are granted to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received in the statement of comprehensive loss/income, unless they are related to the issuance of shares. Amounts related to the issuance of shares are recorded as a reduction of share capital.

When the value of goods and services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.

All equity-settled share based payments are reflected in contributed surplus, until exercised. Upon exercise shares are issued from treasury and the amount reflected in contributed surplus is credited to share capital along with any consideration paid.

Where a grant of options is cancelled or settled during the vesting period, excluding forfeitures when vesting conditions are not satisfied, the Company immediately accounts for the cancellation as an acceleration of vesting and recognizes the amount that otherwise would have been recognized for services received over the remainder of the vesting period. Any payment made to the employee on the cancellation is accounted for as the repurchase of an equity interest except to the extent the payment exceeds the fair value of the equity instrument granted, measured at the repurchase date. Any such excess is recognized as an expense.

Share capital
Financial instruments issued by the Company are classified as equity only to the extent that they do not meet the definition of a financial liability or financial asset. The Company’s common shares, preferred shares, share warrants and flow-through shares are classified as equity instruments.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

The Company will from time to time, issue flow-through common shares to finance a significant portion of its exploration program. Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreements, these shares transfer the tax deductibility of qualifying resource expenditures to investors. On issuance, the Company bifurcates the flow-through share into i) a flow-through share premium, equal to the estimated premium, if any, investors pay for the flow-through feature, which is recognized as a liability and; ii) share capital. Upon expenses being incurred, the Company derecognizes the liability and recognizes a deferred tax liability for the amount of tax reduction renounced to the shareholders. The premium is recognized as other income and the related deferred tax is recognized as a tax provision.

Proceeds received from the issuance of flow-through shares are restricted to be used only for Canadian resource property exploration expenditures within a two-year period. The portion of the proceeds received but not yet expended at the end of the Company’s period is disclosed separately as flow-through share proceeds.

The Company may also be subject to a Part XII.6 tax on flow-through proceeds renounced under the Look-back Rule, in accordance with Government of Canada flow-through regulations. When applicable, this tax is accrued as a financial expense until paid.

Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of income and comprehensive income during the financial period in which they are incurred.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized in profit or loss.

Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a straight-line method to write off the cost of the assets to their residual values over their estimated useful lives. The depreciation and amortization rates applicable to each category of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

This amendment increases the disclosure required regarding the transfer of financial assets, especially if there is a disproportionate amount of transfer transactions that take place around the end of a reporting period. This amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2011.

New standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”
This standard addresses classification and measurement of financial assets and replaces the multiple category and measurement models in IAS 39 for debt instruments with a new mixed measurement model having only two categories: Amortized cost and fair value through profit or loss. IFRS 9 also replaces the models for measuring equity instruments and such instruments are either recognized at the fair value through profit or loss or at fair value through other comprehensive income. Where such equity instruments are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, dividends are recognized in profit or loss to the extent not clearly representing a return of investment: however, other gains and losses (including impairments) associated with such instruments remain in accumulated other comprehensive income indefinitely.

Requirments for financial liabilities were added in October 2010 and they largely carried forward existing requirements in IAS 39, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, except that fair value changes due to credit risk for liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss would generally be recorded in other comprehensive income. This new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. This new standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

New standard IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements”
IFRS 10 requires an entity to consolidate an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Under existing IFRS, consolidation is required when an entity has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. IFRS 10 replaces SIC-12 Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities and parts of IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements.

New standard IFRS 11 “Joint Arrangements”
IFRS 11 requires a venture to classify its interest in a joint arrangement as a joint venture or joint operation. Joint ventures will be accounted for using the equity method of accounting whereas for a joint operation the venturer will recognize its share of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses of the joint operation. Under existing IFRS, entities have the choice to proportionately consolidate or equity account for interests in joint ventures. IFRS 11 supersedes IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures and SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities – Non-monetary Contributions by Venturers.

New standard IFRS 12 “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities”
IFRS 12 establishes disclosure requirements for interests in other entities, such as joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and off balance sheet vehicles. The standard carries forward existing disclosures and also introduces significant additional disclosure requirements that address the nature of, and risks associated with, an entitiy’s interests in other entities.

3. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS NOT YET EFFECTIVE – cont’d

New standard IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement”
IFRS 13 is a comprehensive standard for fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across all IFRS standards. The new standard clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants, at the measurement date. It also establishes disclosures about fair value measurement. Under existing IFRS, guidance on measuring and disclosing fair value is dispersed among the specific standards requiring fair value measurements and in many cases does not reflect a clear measurement basis or consistent disclosure.

Amendments to other standards
In addition, there have been other amendments to existing standards, including IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. IAS 27 addresses accounting for subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates in non-consolidated financial statements. IAS 28 has been amended to include joint ventures in its scope and to address the changes in IFRS 10 to IFRS 13.

Each of the new standards, IFRS 9 to 13 and the amendments to other standards, is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 with early adoption permitted. The Company has not yet begun the process of assessing the impact that the new and amended standards will have on its condensed interim financial statements or whether to early adopt any of the new requirements.

Cash at banks and on hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rate.


NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC.
(formerly Widescope Resources Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF MINERAL PROPERTIES AND DEFERRED EXPLORATION COSTS
							Canada								Greenland

	Post Creek Property		Woods Creek Property		Halcyon Property		Bell Lake Property		Thompson North		South Bay Property		Cedar Property		Maniitsoq Property		Total
Mineral Properties Acquisition
															$
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	44,000	$	19,000	$	33,000	$	43,000	$	120,333	$	120,333	$	120,333		—	$	499,999

Acquisition costs — cash		30,000		15,000		25,000		25,000		—		—		—		—		95,000
Acquisition costs - Shares		18,000		9,000		12,000		18,000		—		—		—		—		57,000

															$
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	92,000	$	43,000	$	70,000	$	86,000	$	120,333	$	120,333	$	120,333		—	$	651,999

Expenditures (recoveries)
															$
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	153,309	$	20,341	$	—	$	560	$	585	$	2,523	$	400		—	$	177,718
Assay and sampling (recovery)		6,043		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		6,043
Automobile costs		1,825		80		—		60		—		—		—		—		1,965
Consulting services		65,865		4,023		6,729		3,033		1,150		120		—		—		80,919
Equipment and supplies		416		416		416		416		—		—		—		—		1,663
Equipment rental		150		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		150
Licenses and fees		—		—		—		434		44,659		—		—		13,738		58,831
Line cutting costs		25,500		—		4,500		—		—		—		—		—		30,000
Shipping and printing costs		593		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		593
Survey costs		103,956		—		18,345		—		—		—		—		—		122,301
Travel and accomodation		192		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		192

Recoveries		—		—				—		—		—		—		—		—
		204,539		4,518		29,990		3,943		45,809		120		—		13,738		302,657
Balance, June 30, 2011		357,849		24,859		29,990		4,503		46,394		2,643		400		13,738		480,375

Total, Balance June 30, 2011	$	449,849	$	67,859	$	99,990	$	90,503	$	166,727	$	122,976	$	120,733	$	13,738	$	1,132,374

The following is a description of the Company’s exploration and evaluation assets and the related spending commitments:

On December 23, 2009 the Company executed a letter of intent whereby the Company has an option to acquire the mineral claim known as the Post Creek Property located within the Sudbury Mining District of Ontario, and paid a non-refundable deposit of $7,500.

On April 5, 2010 the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Post Creek Property and agreed to the following consideration:

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $204,539 (March 31, 2010 — $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Post Creek Property.

The Company’s interest is subject to a 2.5% NSR, of which 1.5% can be repurchased by the Company for $1,500,000. Commencing August 1, 2013, if the Company exercises its option, the Company will be obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $10,000 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

On December 23, 2009 the Company executed a letter of intent whereby the Company has an option to acquire the mineral claim known as the Woods Creek Property located within the Sudbury Mining District of Ontario and paid a non-refundable deposit of $2,500.

On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in the Woods Creek Property and agreed to the following consideration:

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $4,518 (March 31, 2010 - $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Woods Creek Property.

The Company’s interest is subject to a 2.5% NSR, of which 1.5% can be repurchased by the Company for $1,500,000. Commencing August 1, 2013, if the Company exercises its option, the Company will be obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $5,000 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

Halcyon
On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in the Halcyon Property located Ontario and agreed to the following consideration:

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $29,990 (March 31, 2010 - $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Halcyon Property.

The Company’s interest is subject to a 2.5% NSR, of which 1.5% can be repurchased by the Company for $1,500,000. Commencing August 1, 2013, if the Company exercises its option, the Company will be obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $8,000 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire up to a 100% interest in the Bell Lake Property located in Ontario, and agreed to the following consideration:

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $3,943 (March 31, 2010 - $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Bell Lake Property.

The Company’s interest is subject to a 2.5% NSR, of which 1.5% can be repurchased by the Company for $1,500,000. Commencing August 1, 2014, once the Company exercises its option, the Company will be obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $5,000 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

Manitoba Nickel
On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement, with a company with directors in common, to acquire a 100% interest in the Thompson North, South Bay and Cedar Lake properties located in Manitoba, and agreed to consideration of $1,000 cash (paid) and 6,000,000 common shares (issued).The Company’s interest is subject to a 2% NSR, of which 1% can be repurchased by the Company for $1,000,000.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $45,809 (March 31, 2010 — $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Thompson North Property.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $120 (March 31, 2010 — $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the South Bay Property.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $Nil (March 31, 2010 — $Nil) in deferred exploration costs on the Cedar Property.

Maniitsoq — Greenland
On June 15, 2011, the Company paid a license fee on the Maniitsoq property in Greenland. The Company has certain obligations regarding expenditures and reporting, under the terms of the license for fiscal 2011 and 2012.

The authorized capital of the Company comprises an unlimited number of common shares without par value and 100,000,000 Series 1 convertible preferred shares without par value.

Effective April 19, 2010, the Company consolidated its common share capital on a 2:1 basis, whereby each two old shares are equal to one new share and increased its authorized capital from 100,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value. All references to common shares, stock options, warrants and weighted average number of shares outstanding in these consolidated financial statements reflect the share consolidation.

The Company issued 950,000 common shares at a fair value of $57,000 for the acquisition of mineral properties (Note 7).

The Company issued 4,545,463 common shares for a private placement of flow-through shares at $0.22 per share. On issuance, the Company bifurcated the flow-through share into i) a flow-through share premium $135,802.72, investors pay for the flow-through feature, which is recognized as a liability and; ii) share capital $864,199.14.

The Company issued 11,000,000 common shares for a private placement at $0.20 per share and issued 126,000 common shares at $0.20 per share for finder’s fees.

At June 30, 2011, there are 604,724 (December 31, 2010 – 604,724) preferred common shares outstanding. The rights and restrictions of the preferred shares are as follows:

ii)

the holders of the preferred shares are not entitled to vote except at meetings of the holders of the preferred shares, where they are entitled to one vote for each preferred share held;

iv)

the number of the common shares to be received on conversion of the preferred shares is to be determined by dividing the conversion value of the share, $1 per share, by $0.90.

A continuity schedule of outstanding common share purchase warrants at June 30, 2011 is as follows:

At June 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding common share purchase warrants exercisable to acquire common shares of the Company as follows:

The Company has entered into a Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), providing the authority to grant options to directors, officers, employees and consultants enabling them to acquire up to 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Under the Plan, the exercise price of each option equals the market price or a discounted price of the Company’s stock as calculated on the date of grant. The options can be granted for a maximum term of 10 years.

The Company calculates the fair value of all stock-based compensation awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The changes in stock options during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 are as follows:

The weighted average fair value at grant date of options granted during the period ended June 30, 2011 was $0.11 per option (December 31, 2010 $0.10)

These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms of repayment.

Flow-through common shares require the Company to spend an amount equivalent to the proceeds of the issued flow-through common shares on Canadian qualifying exploration expenditures. The Company may be required to indemnify the holders of such shares for any tax and other costs payable by them in the event the Company has not made the required exploration expenditures.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company received $1,000,001.86 from the issue of flow-through shares. These amounts will not be available to the Company for future deduction from taxable income. Effective June 30, 2011, the Company renounced $208,948 to the subscribers under the look-back rule and has incurred $52,237 in deferred tax expense which has not been booked due to the losses to apply against the amount. The Company has booked an amount of $704 which is due regarding the Part Xii.6 tax generated on the renounced expenditures at the period ending June 30, 2011.

Under the IFRS framework, the increase to share capital when flow-through shares are issued is measured based on the current market price of common shares. The incremental proceeds, or “premium”, are recorded as a deferred charge. When expenditures are renounced, a deferred tax

11.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES – cont’d

liability is recognized and the deferred charge is reversed. The net amount is recognized as deferred tax expense. Under IFRS requirements, the Company will record a $135,802 decrease to share capital, a premium liability of $107,427 and a deferred income tax recovery of $28,376.

As future taxable profits of the Company are uncertain, no deferred tax asset has been recognized. As at June 30, 2011, the Company has approximately $572,000 in non-capital losses that can be offset against taxable income in future years which began expiring at various dates commencing in 2009, and approximately $157,000 in capital losses which may be available to offset future taxable capital gains which can be carried forward indefinitely. The potential future tax benefit of these losses has not been recorded as a full-future tax asset valuation allowance has been provided due to the uncertainty regarding the realization of these losses.

The Company manages its capital structure, which consists of share and working capital, and makes adjustments to it, based on the funds available to the Company, in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company’s management to sustain future development of the business.

The properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage; as such the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing cash and raise additional amounts as needed. The Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire interests in additional properties.

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the relative size and nature of the Company, is reasonable.

There were no changes in the Company’s approach to capital management during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company is not exposed to externally imposed capital requirements.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, receivables, marketable securities, trade payables, accrued liabilities and due to related parties. The carrying value of these financial instruments approximates their fair value. Cash is measured based on Level 1 inputs of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company is engaged primarily in the mineral exploration field and manages related industry risk issues directly.

The Company is potentially at risk for environmental reclamation and fluctuations in commodity based market prices associated with resource property interests. Management is of the opinion that the Company addresses environmental risk and compliance in accordance with industry standards and specific project environmental requirements. There is no certainty that all environmental risks and contingencies have been addressed.

Credit risk
The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its cash accounts. This risk is managed through the use of major banks which are high credit quality financial institutions as determined by rating agencies. The Company’s secondary exposure to credit risk is on its receivables. Receivables include primarily goods and services tax due from the Federal Government of Canada. Management believes that the Company has no significant concentration of credit risk arising from operations

Liquidity risk
The Company’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet third party liabilities when due. The Company has working capital of $3,073,898 at June 30, 2011. All of the Company’s liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms. The Company is dependent on management’s ability to raise additional funds so that it can manage its financial obligations. The ability to raise funds in capital markets is impacted by general market and economic conditions and the commodity markets in which the Company conducts business.

Market risk
(a) Interest rate risk
The Company has cash balances and no interest-bearing debt therefore, interest rate risk is minimal.

(b) Foreign currency risk
The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and major purchases are transacted in Canadian dollars: therefore, foreign currency risk is minimal.

ii)

consulting fees: $3,500 per month effective June 1, 2011 the rate changed to $6,000 per month.

Each of the agreements shall be continuous and may only be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties, subject to the provisions that in the event there is a change of effective control of the Company, the party shall have the right to terminate the agreement, within sixty days from the date of such change of effective control, upon written notice to the Company. Within thirty days from the date of delivery of such notice, the Company shall forward to the party the amount of money due and owing to the party hereunder to the extent accrued to the employee to the effective date of termination.

16.

TRANSITION TO IFRS

As a result of the Accounting Standards Board of Canada’s decision to adopt IFRS for publicly accountable entities for

financial reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011, the Company has adopted IFRS in these financial statements,

making them the first six month interim financial statements of the Company under IFRS. The Company previously applied the

available standards under previous Canadian GAAP that were issued by the Accounting Standards Board of Canada.

As required by IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, January 1,

2010 has been considered to be the date of transition to IFRS by the Company. Therefore, the

comparative figures that were previously reported under previous Canadian GAAP have been restated in

accordance with IFRS.

Exemptions applied

The Company has applied the following optional transition
exemptions to full retrospective application of IFRS:

IFRS 2 “Share-based payment” – IFRS 1 allows that full retrospective application may be avoided for certain share-based instruments depending on the

grant date, vesting terms and settlement of any real liabilities. A first-time adopter can elect to not apply IFRS 2 to share-based payments granted

after November 7, 2002 that vested before the later of (a) the date of transition to IFRS and (b) January 1, 2005. The Company plans to elect this

exemption and will apply IFRS 2 to only unvested stock options as at January 1, 2010 being the transition date.

IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” – IFRS 1 allows that a first-time adopter may elect not to apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations

retrospectively to business combinations prior to the date of transition avoiding the requirement to restate prior business

combinations. The Company plans to elect this exemption and as such expects no difference between Canadian GAAP and IFRS on

transition for differences in business combination accounting.

IFRS 1 “Deemed Cost” – allows for exploration and evaluation assets costs to be accounted for in cost centres that include all properties in a large

geographical area. A first-time adopter using such accounting under previous Canadian GAAP may elect to measure exploration and evaluation assets at

the amount determined under the Company’s previous GAAP. The Company plans to elect this exemption and shall continue to test exploration and

evaluation assets in the development phases for impairment at the date of transition to IFRS in accordance with IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation

of Mineral Resources.

Mandatory exceptions applied

IAS 39 “Financial Instruments” the Company has
applied the derecognition of financial assets and
liabilities

exception
requirements
prospectively from
the transition
date. As a result
any non-derivative
financial

assets or
non-derivative
financial
liabilities
derecognized prior
to the Transition
Date in accordance
with pre-

changeover Canadian
GAAP have not been
reviewed for
compliance with IAS
39. The application
of this

exemption has no
impact on the
Company.

The estimates previously made by the Company under
pre-changeover Canadian GAAP were not revised for

the application of
IFRS except where
necessary to
reflect any
difference in
accounting policy
or where there

was objective
evidence that those
estimates were in
error. No
adjustments for
estimates have been
made.

IAS 27 was applied prospectively from the Transition
Date. Total comprehensive income is attributed to the

owners of the
parent and the
non-controlling
interests even if
this results in the
non-controlling
interests

having a deficit
balance. No
adjustment was
required.

16.

TRANSITION TO IFRS – cont’d

Reconciliation to previously reported financial statements

The following tables provide a reconciliation between the amounts previously reported under Canadian GAAP and those anticipated to be reported in accordance with IFRS and related transitional requirements, based on our analysis to date. A summary of each of the noted changes is included in the notes following the reconciliations of the following Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the dates noted below. The anticipated effects of transition from GAAP to IFRS on the cash flow are not material therefore a reconciliation of cash flows has not been presented. The reconciliations and related adjustments have not been audited by the Company’s external auditor.

Consolidated Interim Statement of Financial Position –June 30, 2010
Consolidated Interim Statement of Comprehensive Loss Reconciliation – three months June 30, 2010
Consolidated Interim Statement of Comprehensive Loss Reconciliation – six months June 30, 2010


Consolidated Interim Statement of Financial Position Reconciled to IFRS (unaudited) as follows:
Effect of
Ref		June 30 2010			Transition to IFRS			June 30 2010
CAN GAAP								IFRS
ASSETS
Current assets
					$
Cash		$	953,084			—		$	953,084
Receivables			7,480			—			7,480
Marketable securities			—			—			—
Share subscription receivable			39,000						39,000

Total current assets			999,564			—			999,564
Mineral properties and deferred exploration costs			131,152			—			131,152

					$
Total assets		$	1,130,716			—		$	1,130,716

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade payables and accrued liabilities		$	159,653			—		$	159,653

Total current liabilities			159,653			—			159,653

Total liabilities			159,653			—			159,653
Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Share capital — preferred			604,724			—			604,724
Share capital — common			14,135,609			—			14,135,609
Share subscriptions			141,000			—			141,000
Contributed surplus	a		53,344			(53,344	)		—
Accumulated other comprehensive income			—			—			—
Deficit			(13,963,614	)		53,344			(13,910,270	)

Total shareholders’s equity			971,063			—			971,063

Non-controlling interest			—			—			—

Total equity			971,063			—			971,063
					$
Total liabilities and equity		$	1,130,716			—		$	1,130,716


The Canadian GAAP Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the three months ended June 30, 2010 has been reconciled to IFRS
(unaudited) as follows:
Three Months Ended				Effect of		Three Months Ended
Ref	June 30 2010			Transition to IFRS		June 30 2010
CAN GAAP						IFRS
EXPENSES
	$					$
Consulting		24,075					24,075
Filing fees		18,366					18,366
Investor relation		9,408					9,408
General and administrative		37,578					37,578
Management fees (Note 6)		16,000					16,000
Professional fees		68,359					68,359
Property investigation		1,450					1,450
Salaries		5,000					5,000

LOSS BEFORE OTHER ITEMS		(180,236	)		—		(180,236	)
OTHER ITEMS:
Impairment of mineral property and deferred exploration costs (Note 4)		(91,000	)				(91,000	)
Sale of investment gain/(loss)		94,534					94,534

				$
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD	$	(176,702	)		—	$	(176,702	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE — Basic and diluted
				$
From continuing operations	$	(0.03	)		—	$	(0.03	)



Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and diluted		5,877,994					19,941,566

16. TRANSITION TO IFRS – cont’d Reconciliation to previously reported financial statements – cont’d
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
				$
Net Loss	$	(176,702	)		—	$	(176,702	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—					—

				$
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(176,702	)		—	$	(176,702	)


The Canadian GAAP Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 has been reconciled to IFRS
(unaudited) as follows:
Six Months Ended				Effect of		Six Months Ended
Ref	June 30 2010			Transition to IFRS		June 30 2010
CAN GAAP						IFRS
EXPENSES
	$					$
Consulting		24,075					24,075
Filing fees		18,366					18,366
Investor relation		9,408					9,408
General and administrative		44,719					44,719
Management fees (Note 6)		16,000					16,000
Professional fees		68,359					68,359
Property investigation		1,450					1,450
Salaries		5,000					5,000

LOSS BEFORE OTHER ITEMS		(187,377	)		—		(187,377	)
OTHER ITEMS:
Impairment of mineral property and deferred exploration costs (Note 4)		(91,000	)				(91,000	)
Sale of investment gain/(loss)		96,749					96,749

				$
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD	$	(181,628	)		—	$	(181,628	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE — Basic and diluted
				$
From continuing operations	$	(0.03	)		—	$	(0.03	)



Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and diluted		5,661,067					19,941,566

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
				$
Net Loss	$	(181,628	)		—	$	(181,628	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—					—

				$
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(181,628	)		—	$	(181,628	)

Both Canadian GAAP and IFRS require an entity to undertake quantitative impairment testing where there is an indication of impairment. Further there is a requirement under IFRS for the Company to assess whether indicators of impairment exist at the date of transition to IFRS.

Unlike Canadian GAAP, IFRS requires impairment charges to be reversed if circumstances leading to the impairment no longer exist. The Company has no historic impairment charges which could be reversed as of the transition date.

As at the transition date, there were no indications of impairment under IFRS identified by management, therefore no formal quantitative impairment was undertaken.

On transition to IFRS the Company has elected to change its accounting policy for the treatment of amounts recorded in contributed surplus which relate to stock options which expire unexercised. Under IFRS amounts recorded for expired unexercised stock options will be transferred to deficit on the date of expiry. Previously the Company’s Canadian GAAP policy was to leave such amounts in contributed surplus.

The following presentation adjustment has been identified by management for the Consolidated Balance Sheet which is Non-controlling interests shall be presented in the Consolidated Statement Of Financial Position within equity, separately from the equity of the owners of the parent.

The Company operates in two reportable operating segments being that of the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in two geographic segments being Canada and Greenland..

Subsequent to June 30, 2011, the Company has paid an additional $5,700 on acquiring the Mineral Exploration Licence for exclusive exploration rights on the Maniitsoq Project in Greenland.

In conjunction with the acquisition of the Maniitsoq Mineral Exploration Licence, the Company has entered into an arms length Intellectual Property and Data Acquisition Agreement (the “IP Acquisition Agreement”) with Hunter Minerals Pty Limited (“Hunter”) and Spar Resources Pty Limited (“Spar”). Pursuant to the IP Acquisition Agreement, Hunter and Spar have agreed to sell the IP Rights to the Company in consideration for the Company:

Paying $300,000 in cash ($150,000 to each Hunter and Spar), $200,000 of which has been paid and $100,000 of which will be paid upon acceptance of the IP Acquisition Agreement by the TSX Venture Exchange.

Issuing 12,960,000 share purchase warrants, 6,480,000 to each of Hunter and Spar or their respective nominees, exercisable for a period of five years. 4,750,000 of the warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share, 4,750,000 are exercisable at $0.70 per share; and 3,460,000 are exercisable at $1.00 per share, which warrants will be issued upon acceptance of the IP Acquisition Agreement by the TSX Venture Exchange. The warrants are subject to an accelerated exercise provision in the event the Company relinquishes its interests in the Maniitsoq Licences or any other mineral titles held within a defined area of interest without receiving consideration for such relinquishment.

Granting to each of Hunter and Spar or their designates a 1.25% net smelter returns royalty, subject to rights of NAN to reduce both royalties to a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty upon payment to each of Hunter and Spar (or their designates) of $1,000,000 on or before the 60^th day following a decision to commence commercial production on the mineral properties.


Class of property, plant and equipment	Depreciation rate
Driling and exploration equipment		20	%


	Exploration Equipment			Exploration Equipment
Cost:			Cost:
At December 31, 2010	$	-	At January 1, 2010	$—
Additions		6,500	Additions	—
Disposals			Disposals

At June 30, 2011	$	6,500	At December 31, 2010	$—

Amortization:			Amortization:
At December 31, 2010	$	-	At January 1, 2010	$—
Charge for the period		345.48	Charge for the period	—
Eliminated on disposal			Eliminated on disposal

At June 30, 2011		345	At December 31, 2010	-

Net book value:			Net book value:
At December 31, 2010		-	At January 1, 2010	-

At June 30, 2011		$ 6,155	At December 31, 2010	$ -


	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Trade payables	$	33,915	$	3,253
Amounts due to related parties (Note 10)		59,583	$	87,094
Accrued liabilities		249		39,180

	$	93,747	$	129,527


	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
			Weighted Average				Weighted Average
	Number Outstanding		Exercise Price		Number Outstanding		Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of							$
period		10,000,000	$	0.10		—		—
Granted		11,243,950		0.35		10,000,000		0.10

Outstanding, end of period		21,243,950	$	0.23		10,000,000	$	0.10


Warrants Outstanding		Expiry Date	Exercise Price		Weighted Average remaining contractual life (in years)
	10,000,000	Dec-28-2012		0.10		1.50
	11,243,950	Nov-24-2012		0.35		1.41

	21,243,950					1.45


Rick Mark		Edward D. Ford The accompanying notes are integral part of these consolidated financial statements


Date	Cash		Shares		Exploration
					requirements
On or before April 5, 2010 (paid and issued)	$	12,500		400,000
On or before April 5, 2011 (paid and issued)	$	30,000		300,000	$	15,000	Required costs to date $197,000
On or before April 5, 2012	$	50,000		300,000	$	15,000
On or before April 5, 2013	$	50,000		-	$	15,000


Balance — December 31, 2010	35,231,730	$	14,705,609		$	182,500
Shares issued for private placements	15,545,463		3,089,399			—
Shares issued for mineral properties — non-cash	950,000		57,000			—
Share issue costs	126,000		(85,482	)		—
Stock-based compensation	—		—			134,342

Balance — June 30, 2011	51,853,193	$	17,766,526		$	316,842


Options Outstanding		Options Exercisable		Expiry Date	Exercise Price		Weighted Average remaining contractual life (in years)
	2,950,000		2,950,000	August 27, 2015	$	0.10		4.16
	150,000		150,000	November 25, 2015		0.10		4.41
	200,000		200,000	December 15, 2015		0.10		4.46
	150,000		150,000	May 24, 2016		0.20		4.90
	350,000		350,000	June 29, 2016		0.20		5.00

	3,800,000		3,800,000					4.29


10.		RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
		Related party balances
		The following amounts due to related parties are included in trade payables and accrued liabilities:


	Six month periods ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2011		2010
			$
Geological consulting fees — expensed	$	2,450		—
Geological consulting fees - capitalized		8,050		7,000
Management fees — expensed		27,000		18,000
Stock-based compensation		—		—
	$	37,500	$	25,000


14.		NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
		The Company incurred non-cash financing and investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as follows:


	June 30, 2011		March 31, 2010
Common shares issued for mineral properties (Note 7)	$	57,000	$	—
Stock-based compensation expense recorded as share issuance costs for finders warrants	$	36,592	$	—


15.		COMMITMENTS
		Effective May 1, 2010, the Company entered into the following agreements for services with directors of the Company and a company in which a director has an interest:


Impact on Consolidated Statement of Financial Postion (Unaudited)
	December 31 2010			January 1 2010
Contributed surplus	$	(53,344	)	$	(53,344	)
Adjustment to deficit	$	53,344		$	53,344