XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) design, manufacture, and install laboratory, healthcare, and technical furniture products. The Company’s products include steel, wood, and laminate furniture, fume hoods, biological safety cabinets, laminare flow and ductless fume hoods, adaptable modular and column systems, movable workstations and carts, epoxy resin worksurfaces, sinks and accessories and related design services. The Company’s sales are made through purchase orders and contracts submitted by customers, dealers and agents, a national stocking distributor, and competitive bids submitted by the Company and its subsidiaries located in Singapore, India, and China. The majority of the Company’s products are sold to customers located in North America, primarily within the United States. The Company’s laboratory products are used in chemistry, physics, biology and other general science laboratories in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, industrial, chemical, commercial, educational, government and health care markets. Technical products are used in facilities manufacturing computers and light electronics and by users of computer and networking furniture. Laminate casework is used in educational, healthcare and industrial applications.

Principles of Consolidation The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation and its five international subsidiaries. A brief description of each subsidiary, along with the amount of the Company’s controlling financial interests, is as follows: (1) Kewaunee Labway Asia Pte. Ltd., a dealer for the Company’s products in Singapore, is 100% owned by the Company; (2) Kewaunee Labway India Pvt. Ltd., a dealer for the Company’s products in Bangalore, India, is 90% owned by the Company; (3) Kewaunee Scientific Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. in Bangalore, India, a manufacturing and assembly operation, is 100% owned by the Company; (4) Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Singapore Pte. Ltd., a holding company in Singapore, is 100% owned by the Company; and (5) Kewaunee Scientific (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., a dealer operation for the Company’s products in China, is 100% owned by the Company. All intercompany balances, transactions, and profits have been eliminated. Included in the consolidated financial statements are net assets of $12,268,000 and $12,298,000 at April 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of the Company’s subsidiaries. Net sales by the Company’s subsidiaries in the amount of $25,477,000, $25,579,000, and $25,730,000 were included in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. During the years ended April 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company had cash deposits in excess of FDIC insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from such deposits.

Restricted Cash Restricted cash includes bank deposits of subsidiaries used for performance guarantees against customer orders.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Accounts receivable are stated at the amount owed by the customer, net of allowances for estimated doubtful accounts. The Company evaluates the collectability of its trade accounts receivables based on a number of factors. In circumstances where management is aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, or a project dispute makes it unlikely that all of the receivable owed by a customer will be collected, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded to reduce the recognized receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, a general reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded based on past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable amounts outstanding. Accounts are written off when it is clearly established that the receivable is a bad debt. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for each of the three years ended April 30 was:

 

$ in thousands

   2017      2016      2015  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 202      $ 171      $ 229  

Bad debt provision

     37        74        55  

Doubtful accounts written off (net)

     (48      (43      (113
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

   $ 191      $ 202      $ 171  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Unbilled Receivables Unbilled receivables represent amounts earned which have not yet been billed in accordance with contractually stated billing terms. The amount of unbilled receivables at April 30, 2017 and 2016 was $450,000 and $323,000, respectively.

 

Inventories The majority of inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) double extension method. The LIFO method allocates the most recent costs to cost of products sold; and, therefore, recognizes into operating results fluctuations in costs of raw materials more quickly than other methods. Inventories at our international subsidiaries are measured on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method.

Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is determined for financial reporting purposes principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets or, for leaseholds, over the terms of the related leases, if shorter. Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at April 30:

 

$ in thousands

   2017      2016          Useful Life      

Land

   $ 41      $ 41        N/A        

Building and improvements

     15,892        15,638        10-40 years        

Machinery and equipment

     35,635        34,249        5-10 years        
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     51,568        49,928     

Less accumulated depreciation

     (37,541      (35,810   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Net property, plant and equipment

   $ 14,027      $ 14,118     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Management reviews the carrying value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever changes in circumstances or events indicate that such carrying value may not be recoverable. If projected undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of the potentially impaired asset, the carrying value is reduced to estimated fair value. There were no impairments in fiscal years 2017, 2016, or 2015.

Other Assets Other assets at April 30, 2017 and 2016 included $3,748,000 and $3,867,000, respectively, of assets held in a trust account for non-qualified benefit plans and $75,000 and $62,000, respectively, of cash surrender values of life insurance policies. Life insurance policies are recorded at the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract as of the date of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with the change in cash surrender or contract value being recorded as income or expense during each period.

Use of Estimates The presentation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates impacting the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, inventory valuation, self-insurance reserves, and pension liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments A financial instrument is defined as cash equivalents, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity, or a contract that creates a contractual obligation or right to deliver or receive cash or another financial instrument from another party. The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and equivalents, mutual funds, cash surrender value of life insurance policies, term loans and short-term borrowings. The carrying value of these assets and liabilities approximate their fair value.

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Expanded disclosures about instruments measured at fair value require the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value as follows:

 

Level 1

   Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

   Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 3

   Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

The following tables summarize the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of April 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

 

     2017  

Financial Assets

          Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Trading securities held in non-qualified compensation plans (1)

      $ 3,748      $ —        $ —        $ 3,748  

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies (1)

        —          75        —          75  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

      $ 3,748      $ 75      $ —        $ 3,823  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities

              

Non-qualified compensation plans (2)

      $ —        $ 4,186      $ —        $ 4,186  

Interest rate swap derivatives

        —          62        —          62  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

      $ —        $ 4,248      $ —        $ 4,248  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     2016  

Financial Assets

          Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Trading securities held in non-qualified compensation plans (1)

      $ 3,867      $ —        $ —        $ 3,867  

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies (1)

        —          62        —          62  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

      $ 3,867      $ 62      $ —        $ 3,929  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities

              

Non-qualified compensation plans (2)

      $ —        $ 4,215      $ —        $ 4,215  

Interest rate swap derivatives

        —          166        —          166  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

      $ —        $ 4,381      $ —        $ 4,381  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

  (1) The Company maintains two non-qualified compensation plans which include investment assets in a rabbi trust. These assets consist of marketable securities, which are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned, and life insurance policies, which are valued at their cash surrender value.
  (2) Plan liabilities are equal to the individual participants’ account balances and other earned retirement benefits.

Revenue Recognition Product sales and installation revenue are recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: (1) products have been shipped, or customers have purchased and accepted title to the goods, but because of construction delays, have requested that the Company temporarily store the finished goods on the customer’s behalf; service revenue for installation of products sold is recognized as the installation services are performed, (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (3) the price to the customer is fixed, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company utilizes either the percentage of completion or completed contract method based on facts and circumstances of individual contracts.

Deferred revenue consists of customer deposits and advance billings of the Company’s products where sales have not yet been recognized. Accounts receivable includes retainage in the amounts of $2,839,000 and $1,562,000 at April 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of product sales. Because of the nature and quality of the Company’s products, any warranty issues are determined in a relatively short period after the sale and are infrequent in nature, and as such, warranty costs are immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations and are expensed as incurred.

Product sales resulting from fixed-price construction contracts involve a signed contract for a fixed price to provide the Company’s laboratory furniture and fume hoods for a construction project. In these instances, the Company is usually in the role of a subcontractor, but in some cases may enter into a contract directly with the end-user of the products. Contract arrangements normally do not contain a general right of return relative to the delivered items. Product sales resulting from fixed-price construction contracts are generated from multiple-element arrangements that require separate units of accounting and estimates regarding the fair value of individual elements. The Company has determined that its multiple-element arrangements that qualify as separate units of accounting are (1) product sales and (2) installation services. There is objective and reliable evidence of fair value for both the product sales and installation services and allocation of arrangement consideration for each of these units is based on their relative fair values. Each of these elements represent individual units of accounting, as the delivered item has value to a customer on a stand-alone basis. The Company’s products are regularly sold on a stand-alone basis to customers which provides vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value. The fair value of installation services is separately calculated using expected costs of installation services. Many times the value of installation services is calculated using price quotations from subcontractors to the Company who perform installation services on a stand-alone basis.

Product sales resulting from purchase orders involve a purchase order received by the Company from its dealers or stocking distributor. This category includes product sales for standard products, as well as products which require some customization. Any customization requirements are approved by the customer prior to manufacture of the customized product. Sales from purchase orders are recognized under the terms of the purchase order which generally are freight on board (“FOB”) shipping point and do not include rights of return. Accordingly, these sales are recognized at the time of shipment.

Credit Concentration Credit risk is generally not concentrated with any one customer or industry, although the Company does enter into large contracts with individual customers from time to time. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers. Revenues from three of the Company’s domestic dealers represented in the aggregate approximately 38%, 40%, and 36% of the Company’s sales in fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Accounts receivable for two domestic customers represented approximately 25% and 24% of the Company’s total accounts receivable as of April 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Insurance Effective January 1, 2016, the Company moved from a fully-insured health care program to a self-insured program. The Company accrues estimated losses for claims incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) using actuarial models and assumptions based on historical loss experience. The Company has also purchased specific stop-loss insurance to limit claims above a certain amount. The Company adjusts insurance reserves, as needed, in the event that future loss experience differs from historical loss patterns.

Income Taxes In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” the Company uses the liability method in measuring the provision for income taxes and recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Provision has not been made for income taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries as these earnings are deemed to be permanently reinvested. ASC 740 clarifies the financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under ASC 740, the Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC 740 only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. The Company did not have any significant uncertain tax positions at April 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” in fiscal year 2016 and applied prospective treatment of the standard. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

Research and Development Costs Research and development costs are charged to cost of products sold in the periods incurred. Expenditures for research and development costs were $1,163,000, $1,167,000, and $936,000 for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred, and include trade shows, training materials, sales, samples, and other related expenses. Advertising costs for the years ended April 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $352,000, $311,000, and $404,000, respectively.

Derivative Financial Instruments The Company records derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships. The nature of the Company’s business activities involves the management of various financial and market risks, including those related to changes in interest rates. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes. In May 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby the interest rate payable by the Company on $3,450,000 of outstanding long-term debt was effectively converted to a fixed interest rate of 4.875% for the period beginning May 1, 2013 and ending August 1, 2017. In May 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby the interest rate payable by the Company on $2,600,000 of outstanding long-term debt was effectively converted to a fixed interest rate of 4.37% for the period beginning August 1, 2017 and ending May 1, 2020. In May 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement whereby the interest rate payable by the Company on $1,218,000 of outstanding long-term debt was effectively converted to a fixed interest rate of 3.07% for the period beginning November 3, 2014 and ending May 1, 2020. The Company entered into these interest rate swap arrangements to mitigate future interest rate risk associated with its long-term debt and has designated these as cash flow hedges. (See Note 3)

Foreign Currency Translation The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside the United States are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at fiscal year-end exchange rates. Sales, expenses, and cash flows are translated at weighted average exchange rates for each period. Net translation gains or losses are included in other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments, since it does not provide for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions of these subsidiaries are included in operating expenses.

Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the assumed exercise and conversion of outstanding options under the Company’s stock option plans, except when options have an antidilutive effect. Options to purchase 39,200, 110,100 and 80,800 shares at April 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares at that date, and accordingly such options would have an antidilutive effect.

The following is a reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

Shares in thousands

   2017      2016      2015  

Weighted average common shares outstanding

        

Basic

     2,705        2,667        2,626  

Dilutive effect of stock options

     21        20        32  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

     2,726        2,687        2,658  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accounting for Stock Options Compensation costs related to stock options granted by the Company are charged against operating expenses during their vesting period, under ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. The Company granted stock options for 45,200, 40,200, and 45,800 shares during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. (See Note 5)

New Accounting Standards In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). This update outlines a new comprehensive revenue recognition model that supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance and requires companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The FASB has issued several updates and/or practical expedients to ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 and the subsequent updates and/or practical expedients to the standard will be effective for the Company during the first quarter of our fiscal year 2019 and we do not plan to early adopt. ASU 2014-09 provides two methods of adopting the standard: using either a full retrospective approach or modified retrospective approach. We expect to elect the modified retrospective approach of adopting the standard. We have conducted a preliminary assessment of how ASU 2014-09 is likely to affect us, identifying the Company’s revenue streams and performance obligations. Our contracts with customers currently may be for single performance obligations or for multiple performance obligations. Based on our preliminary assessment, we do not believe the new standard materially changes our accounting policy for these types of performance obligations. We have also evaluated the impact the new standard will have on our existing policies, contracts, accounting processes, internal controls, reporting systems and disclosure processes and are in the process of identifying improvements and or enhancements that we will make to the aforementioned in preparing to comply with the new guidance. We continue to evaluate the implications of the new guidance and at this time do not believe the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, equity or cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” which requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and requires related footnote disclosures. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, ending after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard effective May 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company adopted this standard effective May 1, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory – Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” This guidance changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard effective May 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” This guidance eliminates the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. Instead, the update requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted prospectively or retrospectively. The Company early adopted this guidance prospectively beginning with the Consolidated Balance Sheet at April 30, 2016. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, “Leases.” This guidance establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2020. The Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the adoption of this standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-9, “Stock Compensation – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This guidance simplifies various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard effective May 1, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current incurred loss method used for determining credit losses on financial assets, including trade receivables, with an expected credit loss method. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2021. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Cash Flow Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which clarifies guidance on classification of certain transactions in the statement of cash flows, including classification of debt prepayments, debt extinguishment costs and contingent consideration payments after a business combination. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows – Restricted Cash,” which requires that the statement of cash flows reconcile the change during the period in total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2021. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” which requires that the service cost component of net periodic pension cost is presented in the same line as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the respective employees during the year. The other components of net periodic pension cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside of earnings from operations. This guidance allows for the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this standard in fiscal year 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.