10-K 1 cspi-20190930x10k.htm 10-K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
| EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019.
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
| EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000‑10843

CSP Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Massachusetts |  | 04‑2441294
(State of incorporation) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

175 Cabot Street, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854

(Address of principal executive offices)

(978) 954‑5038

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class |  | Trading Symbol(s) |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |  | CSPI |  | Nasdaq Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10‑K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☒ | Smaller Reporting Company ☒
| Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $40,671,108 based on the closing sale price of $11.15 as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market on March 29, 2019.

As of December 3, 2019, we had outstanding 4,153,742 shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the information required in Part III of this Form 10‑K are incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page
PART I. |
Item 1. | Business | 2
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 11
Item 2. | Properties | 19
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 19
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 19
PART II. |  |
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 20
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 20
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 31
Item 9. | Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures | 32
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 32
Item 9B. | Other Information | 33
PART III. |  |
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 33
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 33
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 33
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 34
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 34
PART IV. |  |
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 34
Item 16. | Form 10‑K Summary | 36

Note: Items 1B, 6 and 7A are not required for Smaller Reporting Companies and therefore are not furnished.

i

Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report on Form 10‑K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. The discussion below contains certain forward-looking statements related but not limited to, among others, statements concerning future revenues and future business plans. Forward-looking statements include statements in which we use words such as “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, the forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and thus we cannot assure you that these expectations will prove to be correct, and actual results may vary from those contained in such forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks and uncertainties in Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

Factors that may cause such variances include, but are not limited to, our dependence on a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, our high dependence on contracts with the U.S. federal government, our reliance in certain circumstances on single sources for supply of key product components, and intense competition in the market segments in which we operate. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this document. We have based the forward-looking statements included in this annual report on Form 10‑K on information available to us on the date of this annual report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, other than as required by law.

1

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

CSP Inc. ("CSPi" or "CSPI" or "the Company" or "we" or "our") was incorporated in 1968 and is based in Lowell, Massachusetts. To meet the diverse requirements of our commercial and defense customers worldwide, CSPi and its subsidiaries develop and market IT integration solutions, advanced security products, managed IT services, cloud services, purpose built network adapters, and high-performance cluster computer systems.

On July 31, 2018, CSPi LTD sold all of the outstanding stock of Modcomp GmbH for $14.4 million cash, and recognized a gain of $16.8 million. The divestiture of our German operations and our increased cash position enables us to focus time and resources on our higher-margin and greater-potential growth opportunities. We are encouraged by the traction of our managed services business in the U.S. and we intend to continue to invest and focus on our new ARIA SDS cyber security products and to capitalize on the proliferation of our wireless service business.

Segments

CSPI operates in two segments: Technology Solutions ("TS") and High Performance Products ("HPP").

TS Segment

The TS segment consists of our wholly-owned Modcomp subsidiary, which operates in the United States and the United Kingdom.

The TS segment generates product revenues by reselling third-party computer hardware and software as a value added reseller ("VAR"). The TS segment generates service revenues by the delivery of integration services for complex IT environments, including advanced security; unified communications and collaboration; wireless and mobility; data center solutions; and network solutions as well as managed IT services ("MSP") that primarily serve the small and mid-sized business market ("SMB").

Third party products and professional services are marketed and sold through the Company’s direct sales force into a variety of vertical markets, including; automotive; defense; health care; education; federal, state and local government; and maritime.

CSPi sold all of the outstanding stock of Modcomp GmbH to Reply AG on July 31, 2018 for total cash consideration of $14.4 million. CSPi recognized a one-time gain of $16.8 million. The Company determined the German subsidiary met the criteria for discontinued operations under ASC 205. The Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations reflect the results of Modcomp GmbH classified as discontinued operations at and as of September 30, 2018. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

HPP Segment

| · |  | The HPP segment revenue comes from four distinct product lines: (i) a cybersecurity solution marketed as ARIA™ Software-Defined Security (“SDS”), which is offered to commercial, original equipment manufacturers ("OEM") and government customers; (ii) the Myricom® network adapters for commercial, government and OEM customers; (iii) the ARIA nVoy Series of appliances for Managed Security Service Providers (“MSSPs”) and end-user customers; and (iv) the legacy Multicomputer product portfolio for digital signal processing ("DSP") applications within the defense markets.

| · |  | The ARIA SDS solution is a software portfolio starting with the underlying platform (orchestrator, light-weight instances), and hosted applications, as well as supporting hardware (turn-key security appliances), all developed to secure an organization’s network, enterprise-wide, to better protect critical devices, applications and high-

2

Table of Contents

value data, such as personally identifiable information ("PII"), from breaches. Revenue will come from the sale of licenses of our software platform components, hosted applications, turnkey appliances and the required support packages. The software licenses are renewable on an annual basis. The ARIA SDS platform and applications can be deployed on our separately sold Myricom adapters that can be deployed within our customers servers, or via our turn-key appliances that can be deployed in data centers or within the customers network to provide network security services. Alternatively, with future releases, organizations will be able deploy ARIA SDS on cloud infrastructure as a service to protect this portion of their IT environment. We had our first sale in the last half of fiscal year 2019 and the pipeline has started to build up for fiscal year 2020. We expect to have additional revenue starting in the second quarter of fiscal year 2020, which we expect will increase throughout the year.

| · |  | We anticipate that the ARIA SDS portfolio will be of value to regulated industries, such as financial services or healthcare, due to the rise of data-privacy regulations enforced at the federal, U.S. state, and international level, as well as industry entities. We also believe the unique, patent-pending approach will be attractive to managed security services providers (MSSP) and OEMs that pursue differentiated security services for their customers. While our initial offerings of the ARIA SDS portfolio are available now, the number of offerings will continue to expand over time.

| · |  | The Myricom network adapters (ARC Series and SIA) are optimized for and sold into markets that require high bandwidth and low latency including (i) packet capture, (ii) financial transactions, and (iii) storage interconnect. And with our SIA organizations that require advanced security features added to their production server deployments. Our primary customers for packet capture include government agencies that need to capture, inject, and analyze network traffic at line rate, and OEMs selling into vendors of computer security appliances. Financial institutions, such as banks, and brokerage firms use Myricom adapters to decrease transaction times. Our storage interconnect customers, primarily in the film industry, use our adapters for video capture and film editing. Organizations that run advanced network security features benefit from the ability to run such applications safely on our adapter preserving server performance for production applications.

| · |  | The nVoy Series of appliances (Packet Recorder and Packet Broker) can be deployed as part of an organization’s data security structure as a new component to complement existing systems and provides data breach verification and notification as well as compliance reporting. The primary customers will be OEMs or MSSPs that are looking to expand their product and services offerings of industry regulation compliance and breach response solutions.

| · |  | Multicomputer products for DSP applications are no longer being actively developed but will continue to be sold for deployment and supported for several years. Revenue flows come from servicing previously deployed products for a modest number of existing high-value defense customers. Therefore, the revenue from these products, as a percentage of overall Company revenue, is expected to decline over time.

Sales Information by Industry Segment

The following table details our sales by operating segment for fiscal years ending September 30, 2019 and 2018. Additional segment and geographical information is set forth in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.

Segment |  | 2019 |  | % |  | 2018 |  | % |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
TS |  | $ | 71,159 |  | 90 | % | $ | 62,437 |  | 86 | %
HPP |  |  | 7,902 |  | 10 | % |  | 10,479 |  | 14 | %
Total Sales |  | $ | 79,061 |  | 100 | % | $ | 72,916 |  | 100 | %

3

Table of Contents

TS Segment

Products and Services

Integration Solutions

In the TS segment, we focus on value-added reseller ("VAR") integrated solutions including third-party hardware, software and technical computer-related consulting services and managed services. Our value proposition is our ability to integrate diverse third-party components together into a complete solution to install the system at the customer site and to offer high value IT consulting services to deliver solutions.

Third-Party Hardware and Software

We sell third-party hardware and software products in the information technology market, with a strategic focus on industry standard servers and data center infrastructure solutions, midrange data storage infrastructure products, network products, unified communications, and IT security hardware and software solutions. Our key offerings include products from HPE/Aruba, Cisco Systems, Palo Alto Networks, DellEMC, Juniper Networks, Citrix, Intel, VMWare, Fortinet, Microsoft and Checkpoint. Through our business relationships with these vendors, we are able to offer competitively priced robust products to meet our customers’ diverse technology needs, providing procurement and engineering expertise in server infrastructure, storage, security, unified communications and networking, to the small-to-medium sized businesses ("SMBs") and large enterprise businesses ("LEBs") with complex IT environments. We offer our customers a single point of contact for complex multi-vendor technology purchases. Many of our SMB customers have unique technology needs and may lack technical purchasing expertise or have very limited IT engineering resources on staff. We also provide installation, integration, logistical assistance and other value-added services that customers may require. Our current customers are in web and infrastructure hosting, education, telecommunications, healthcare services, distribution, financial services, professional services and manufacturing. We target SMBs and LEB customers across all industries.

Professional Services

We provide professional IT consulting services in the following areas:

| · |  | Implementation, integration, migration, configuration, installation services and project management.

| · |  | Hyper-Converged Infrastructure ("HCI") - We assist our clients with designing and implementing HCI solutions from multiple vendors including DellEMC, Nutanix, HPE and Cisco. HCI is a software-centric architecture that tightly integrates compute, storage and virtualization resources in a single system. The benefits of an HCI solution are improved performance, scalability and flexibility all in a reduced footprint.

| · |  | Virtualization - We help our customers implement virtualization solutions using products from companies such as VMWare and Citrix that allow one computer to do the job of multiple computers by sharing resources of a single computer across multiple environments. Virtualization eliminates physical and geographical limitations and enables users to host multiple operating systems and applications on fewer servers. Benefits include energy cost savings, lower capital expenditure requirements, high availability of resources, better desktop management, increased security and improved disaster recovery.

| · |  | Enterprise security intrusion prevention, network access control and unified threat management. Using third-party products from companies like Palo Alto, Aruba Networks, Juniper Networks, Fortinet, Checkpoint and Cisco Systems, our services are designed to ensure data security and integrity through the establishment of virtual private networks, firewalls and other technologies.

| · |  | IT security compliance services. We provide services for IT security compliance with personal privacy laws such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard ("PCI DSS"), t he Health Insurance Portability and

4

Table of Contents

Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), and internal control regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX").

| · |  | Unified communications, wireless and routing and switching solutions using Cisco Systems and Aruba Networks products and services.

| · |  | Custom software applications and solutions development and support. We develop custom applications to customer specifications using industry standard platforms such as Microsoft.Net, SharePoint and OnBase. We are a Microsoft Gold Partner.

| · |  | Managed IT services that include monitoring, reporting and management of alerts for the resolution and preventive general IT and IT security support tasks.

| · |  | Maintenance and technical support for third-party products including hardware and software, operating system and user support.

Managed and Cloud Services

As consumption models continue to evolve in our industry, we have developed a robust managed & cloud services offering to provide alternative solutions to traditional capital expenditure investments in IT solutions and IT operations for our clients. Our value is to provide an elastic offering that will allow the client to scale and consume these offerings with monthly billing options that help control costs and provide economies of scale.

We provide managed and cloud services in the following areas:

| · |  | Proactive monitoring and remote management of IT Infrastructure that includes network (both wired and wireless), data center (which includes compute, storage and virtualization), desktops, unified communications platforms and security.

| · |  | Managed and Hosted Unified Communication as a Service via a Cisco Collaboration offering under an annuity program.

| · |  | Managed Security (firewall, endpoint protection, malware, anti-virus and SIEM).

| · |  | Managed BackUp and Replication.

| · |  | Cloud services that include Microsoft Office 365, Azure, Greencloud and Amazon Web Services.

Markets, Marketing and Dependence on Certain Customers

We are an IT systems integrator and computer hardware and software VAR. We also provide technical services to achieve a value-add to our customers. We operate within the VAR sales channels of major computer hardware and software OEMs, primarily within the geographic areas of our sales offices and across the U.S. We provide innovative IT solutions, including a myriad of infrastructure products with customized integration consulting services and managed services to meet the unique requirements of our customers. We market the products and services we sell through sales offices in the U.S. and the U.K. using our direct sales force.

Competition

Our primary competition in the TS segment is other VARs ranging from small companies that number in the thousands, to large enterprises such as CDW, PC Connection, Insight, Presidio, Dimension Data, and Computacenter Limited. In addition, we compete directly with many of the companies that manufacture the third-party products we sell, including Cisco Systems, IBM, Hewlett Packard (HPE), EMC (now part of Dell) and others. In the network

5

Table of Contents

management, security and storage systems integration services business, our competitors are extensive and vary to a certain degree in each of the geographical markets, but they also include such national competitors as HP/EDS, IBM and Cap Gemini.

Nearly all of our product offerings are available through other channels. Favorable competitive factors for the TS segment include procurement capability, product diversity which enables the delivery of complete and custom solutions to our customers and the strength of our key business relationships with the major IT OEMs. We also consider our ability to meet the unique and/or specialized needs of the SMB and LEB markets and our strong knowledge of the IT products that we sell to be a key competitive advantage. Our ability to provide managed services through our network operations center and the professional IT services required to design and install custom IT solutions to address our customers' IT needs are distinct competitive advantages. Unfavorable competitive factors include low name recognition, limited geographic coverage and pricing.

Backlog

The backlog of customer orders and contracts for the TS segment was approximately $4.0 million at September 30, 2019, as compared to $7.2 million at September 30, 2018. Our backlog can fluctuate greatly. These fluctuations can be due to the timing of receiving large orders for third-party products and/or IT services. It is expected that all of the customer orders in backlog will ship and/or be provided during fiscal year 2020.

HPP Segment

Products and Services

The mission of the HPP team is to deliver a differentiated, smarter approach to cybersecurity. Our software-defined platform makes it easier for organizations to achieve enterprise-wide network security and protection of critical assets, applications and devices by improving their network visibility capabilities and accelerating their incident response.

Products

The ARIA SDS solution will give organizations an automated, central, and coordinated way to accelerate cyber threat detection and response, implement and enforce security polices, control which applications can access critical assets, and to protect applications and the associated data. The ARIA Orchestrator ("SDSo") and instances ("SDSi"), provide the foundation of the ARIA platform, so that a series of lightweight advanced security applications can be deployed, provisioned and managed uniformly across any sized organization.

These instances can be deployed in a variety of scenarios including bare metal servers, virtual machines ("VMs"), and container-based compute environments. The ARIA SDSo will automatically detect any instances and will programmatically execute the specified applications security feature set strengthening an organization's security posture.

For customers that desire a turnkey solution, a bundled offering can be created for deployment and opens the possibility for professional services and integration services offerings to our channel.

ARIA SDS APPLICATIONS

The deployment of hosted applications bring life to the ARIA SDS platform. Application availability will expand over time as new products are released. However, the current offerings we believe have significant market potential.

1) ARIA SDS Packet Intelligence: The ARIA Packet Intelligence ("PI") application directs all of an organization’s network traffic to existing intrusion detection systems (“IDS”) security tools such as security information and event management solutions ("SIEMs"), user and entity behavior analytics ("UEBA"), or network intrusion protection systems ("NIPS” or “IPS"), and making these tools more effective at detecting network-born threats.

6

Table of Contents

The ARIA PI application will be available as licensed functionality within a low-cost high-availability ("HA") security appliance, or probe, that taps into an organization’s network infrastructure, as well as on the Myricom Secure Intelligent Adapter ("SIA"). The probe will be able to mine data at 10-25G line rates and perform remedial actions to stop threats on a per-traffic stream basis while minimizing impact on network traffic performance. Built-in APIs allow compatible 3 rd party threat detection tools to take actions to stop detected threats. It is our belief that competing solutions currently do not provide this mix and level of capability. We will be able to provide a packaged solution by installing 3 rd party IPS/IDS applications, onto ARIA hardware appliances that run alongside and are fed by ARIA SDS applications, such as Packet Intelligence. The ARIA PI application will be able to improve IPS or IDS performance by preprocessing the data feeds, allowing such solutions to run effectively at higher line rates.

2) ARIA SDS Packet Capture: Our Sniffer10G ("SNF") software is used by intelligence agencies for packet capture, network surveillance applications, and to perform detailed cyber-threat analysis. It’s a recommended solution to increase the Zeek IDS (formerly known as Bro) to support 10G line rates rather than the standard 1G. With the introduction of ARIA SDS and the Myricom SIA, SNF will be upgraded to support a 25G line-rate. When used in conjunction with the Packet Intelligence application, the SNF application can provide the details required to determine the exact type of threat and/or identify the compromised data records.

3) ARIA SDS KMS (Key Management Server): The ARIA KMS application will make it easier to add encryption and decryption capabilities to applications which leverage a standards-based key management interoperability protocol ("KMIP") client. For example, each of VMware’s vSphere and vSAN instances leverage a KMIP client to encrypt their application data output. As such, they need to be fed KMIP compatible keys to perform encryption. Depending upon the size of the environment, this could require hundreds of keys per minute. Our KMS key management server solution provides such KMIP keys securely and rapidly at scale while ensuring that the key servers are highly available at all times. Our application was designed to solve the deployment complexity challenges currently associated with key management.

4) ARIA AIR (Automated Investigative Response) The ARIA AIR and Packet Recorder applications will make it easier to detect data breaches and exfiltrated data from critical data applications. Used in conjunction with threat intelligence tools which will alert if an internal system is accessing a bad site, we ingest the alert use it to trigger a search our recordings of the traffic flowing from the critical applications to determine if there is a match. This indicates a breach and provides a record of all the records that have been exfiltrated.

MYRICOM NETWORK ADAPTERS

Myricom ARC Series product line includes a portfolio of Ethernet adapters and specialized software, which is branded as DBL for financial institutions and Sniffer10G ("SNF") for network monitoring. Both are compatible with Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, and VMware ESX. Our adapters act as stand-alone Network Interface Cards ("NIC”) and support purpose-built for applications that provide high bandwidth, low latency and line-rate packet capture, and processing off load for high-frequency financial trading and network traffic analysis applications.

Myricom Secure Intelligent Adapter ("SIA") is our next-generation adapter and will provide additional compute capabilities and specialized hardware to run the ARIA SDS platform and applications. A 25G version of SNF is being developed to deliver higher line rates as required by enterprise and government customers. This will also let these organizations achieve lossless packet capture and packet inspection, which is required for network surveillance use cases and tools, such as lawful intercept, deep packet inspection, forensic tools, and threat detection applications. Other customers for the SIA include OEMs and MSSP partners to run their own applications upon.

ARIA SECURITY APPLIANCES

ARIA Security Appliances provides a standalone solution that can be either deployed in line to provide network security or within a data center to provide security services. These appliances are built with one or multiple built in SIA adapters. This allows for broader options to deploy our services in a turnkey fashion.

7

Table of Contents

nVoy Series is comprised of a 100G Packet Broker and a 10G Packet Recorder appliance optimized to run our ARIA software. These tools assist customers in the deployment of our ARIA solution into higher speed networks, as well as provide the compute and storage intensive functions needs to provide some of our services such as Packet recording.

MULTICOMPUTER PRODUCTS

Multicomputer products portfolio includes the 2000 SERIES VME and 3000 SERIES VXS systems. The 2000 SERIES products, based on PowerPC RISC processors with AltiVec™ technology, high-speed memory, and Myrinet-2000™ cluster interconnect, are currently is use by customers in the aerospace, commercial, and defense markets. The 3000 SERIES VXS product line, incorporating the Freescale QorIQ PowerPC processors with AltiVec technology, targets high-performance DSP, signal intelligence ("SIGINT"), and radar and sonar applications in airborne, shipboard, and unmanned aerial vehicle ("UAV") platforms where space, power, and cooling are at a premium. The HPP segment will continue to ship and repair existing Multicomputer products to its customer base and support an installed base of DSP systems.

Royalties on Multicomputer products

We license the design of certain 2000 SERIES computer processor boards and switch interconnect technology to third parties. In exchange for licensing this technology, we receive a royalty payment for each processor board that utilizes our design for these products.

Markets, Marketing and Dependence on Certain Customers

Aerospace & Defense Market

Our focus for fiscal 2020 and beyond is to continue our support of established Multicomputer and Myricom products allowing system deployments to be made by government entities. These programs have support requirements that often extend beyond twenty years.

Financial Transactions Market

Myricom network adapters with DBL application software address the need for the ultra-low latency required in the world of financial trading. Running DBL on the Myricom ARC Series provides acceleration for 10G Ethernet environments, with benchmarked application-to-application latency in the single digit microsecond range for Linux and Microsoft Windows operating systems.

Packet Capture Market

Myricom Sniffer10G, and in development, the 25G software, running on Myricom Ethernet adapters, provides enterprise and government customers and partners the ability to capture, inject, and analyze network traffic at line rate for all Ethernet packet sizes, with low-cost CPU overhead. Sniffer10G serves the following market segments: network surveillance, monitoring and analysis, testing, measurement, and packet generation, as well as a technology component within intrusion detection systems ("IDS"), forensic tools, and threat detection and response solutions.

Storage Interconnect Market

Myricom ARC Series network adapters are used in a wide range of networked applications, including those that connect to storage subsystems using Ethernet. Many of these customers are using content-creation applications requiring high-performance networking from the storage system to video-editing workstations.

8

Table of Contents

Cyber Security Products Market

The ARIA SDS solution is targeted at organizations that need to get additional functionality out of their current cyber security solutions to find and stop intrusion threats, while also reducing their operating costs. While our ARIA SDS solutions will be offered through our direct sales channel, it is more likely that sales will come through via independent software vendor channels to the end customers. These value added resellers will find ARIA appealing to expand their portfolio of security products and services and replace less-effective tools and processes in their customer environments.

OEMs in the cyber security segments will be candidates for ARIA SDS deployments. These vendors can benefit from integrating the ARIA applications as internal solution toolsets to allow their application to scale, add critical functionality, or solve particular problems, such as poor performance. OEMs are interested in the Myricom Adapters including our SIA running our ARIA SDS applications, for use as Smart NICs within their appliances. We believe this will be a large growing market we can participate in in the coming years.

Another target for the ARIA solution will be the managed security services providers, as these providers’ desire simple, yet differentiated, solutions that can be deployed across their customer bases. The orchestration and automation capabilities found in ARIA SDS are valuable as they allow these security service providers to scale their offerings while increasing the productivity of their security operation center staff.

Competition

CSPi’s competition in the cybersecurity space comes primarily from the large, traditional security vendors like Dell, IBM, and Intel. Due to the ARIA’s approach to network and data security, we also face competition from traditional security tools and current approaches to finding network based attacks. The competition includes common firewall manufacturers with broad portfolios such as Palo Alto or Cisco, and in the case of data packet brokers, Gigamon and Ixia. Competitors for ARIA SDS encryption include applications and appliances provided by Thales, HPE’s Voltaic group, and other smaller market players.

In the crowded security products market, our history of supporting defense and government military programs, strong security application expertise, and the ability to develop optimized products for OEMs will help set us apart. However, we must continually develop new features and solutions to stay abreast of evolving customer requirements and leverage advances in technology. One example is Intel’s chip-level roadmap that may provide additional functionality for our ARIA SDS solution but our competitors could also attempt to leverage this. Some of these competitors may also be potential go-to-market partners or OEM customers looking to integrate our capabilities within their products and solutions.

Customers who need a combination of advanced data protection features and who require optimized application performance are best suited to the ARIA solution. Security adapter products will also leverage previous generation Myricom ARC Series network adapter capabilities that include advanced filtering, support for kernel bypass technologies, lossless packet capture, and precision time stamping. These new capabilities will offer a variety of security service combinations that our customers can put to use.

Manufacturing, Assembly and Testing

Currently, all Multicomputer products are shipped to our customers directly from our plant in Lowell, Massachusetts. Our manufacturing activities consist mainly of final assembly and testing of printed circuit boards and systems that are designed by us and fabricated by outside third-party vendors.

Upon our receipt of material and components from outside suppliers, our quality assurance technicians inspect these products and components. During manufacture and assembly, both sub-assemblies and completed systems are subjected to extensive testing, including burn-in and environmental stress screening designed to minimize equipment failure at delivery and over the useful service life of the system. We also use diagnostic programs to detect and isolate

9

Table of Contents

potential component failures. A comprehensive log is maintained of past failures to monitor the ongoing reliability of our products and improve design standards.

Currently, Myricom products, including the nVoy appliances and Myricom network adapters, are shipped to our customers directly from our plant in Lowell, Massachusetts. The packet recorder and packet broker appliances are sourced from third-party partners, integrated with CSPi software and resold under the CSPi brand. Our network adapters are designed in-house and fabricated by outside third party vendors. Material and components received from outside suppliers are inspected by our quality assurance technicians.

The ARIA SDS solution (platform and applications) will be downloaded and licensed from servers or content-delivery services directly controlled by CSPi. The ARIA software can be sold in conjunction with the Myricom SIA, or our appliances, which may be preloaded with the appropriate images. Licensing will be handled by the ARIA SDSo which will be accessible by CSPi’s licensing severs to allow proper flexible services feature set activation and payment.

We provide a warranty covering defects arising from the sale of Multicomputer and Myricom products, which varies from 90 days to three years, depending upon the particular unit in question.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

Several components used in our HPP segment products are obtained from sole-source suppliers. We are dependent on key vendors such as Xilinx or NXP for a variety of processors for certain products and Wind River Systems, Inc. for VxWorks operating system software. Despite our dependence on these sole-source suppliers, based on our current forecast and our projected sales obligations, we believe we have adequate inventory on hand and our current near-term requirements can be met in the existing supply chain.

Research and Development

For the year ended September 30, 2019, our expenses for R&D were approximately $2.8 million compared to approximately $3.3 million for fiscal year 2018. Expenditures for R&D are expensed as they are incurred. Product development efforts in fiscal year 2019 involved development of the ARIA SDS product set, and enhancements to our Myricom products, in which we expect to continue to make investments related to the development of new hardware adapter products and the ARIA SDS software that enables the hardware to meet the needs of specific applications. Our current R&D plan is intended to extend the usefulness and marketability of these products by adding features and capabilities to meet the needs of our markets.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of trademark and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property rights. We have two pending patents for the ARIA SDS software and will be pursuing additional patent rights over time.

Backlog

The backlog of customer orders and contracts in the HPP segment was approximately $0.5 million at September 30, 2019 as compared to $1.0 million at September 30, 2018. Our backlog can fluctuate greatly. These possible large fluctuations can be due to the timing of receipt of large orders often for purchases from prime contractors for sales to the government. It is expected that all of the customer orders in backlog will ship within the next twelve months from September 30, 2019.

10

Table of Contents

Significant Customers

See Note 18 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information regarding customers which comprised 10% or more of consolidated revenues for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

Employees

As of September 30, 2019, we had approximately 114 full time equivalent employees worldwide for our consolidated operations. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we have had no work stoppages in the last three fiscal years. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

Company Website

The Company’s internet address is http://www.cspi.com. Through that address, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8‑K and amendments to those reports are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Securities and Exchange Commission or Commission). The information contained on the Company’s website is not included in, nor incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10‑K.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Information regarding our sales by geographic area and percentage of sales based on the location to which the products are shipped or services rendered are in Note 18 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

If any of the risks and uncertainties set forth below actually materialize, our business, financial condition and/or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the trading price of our common stock could decline and a stockholder could lose all or part of its, his or her investment. The risks and uncertainties set forth below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations.

We depend on a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue and loss of any customer could significantly affect our business.

Both the HPP and TS segments are reliant upon a small number of significant customers, and the loss of or significant reduction in sales to any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019, one customer accounted for approximately $10.2 million in revenue, or 13% of our total revenues for the fiscal year. In addition, our revenues are largely dependent upon the ability of our customers to continue to grow or need services or to develop and sell products that incorporate our products. No assurance can be given that our customers will not experience financial or other difficulties that could adversely affect their operations and, in turn, our results of operations.

We depend on key personnel and skilled employees and face competition in hiring and retaining qualified employees.

We are largely dependent upon the skills and efforts of our senior management, managerial, sales and technical employees. None of our senior management personnel or other key employees are subject to any employment contracts except Victor Dellovo, our Chief Executive Officer and President. The loss of services of any of our executives or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on our ability to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled technical professionals. Our ability to maintain and renew existing engagements and obtain new business depends, in large part, on our ability to hire and retain technical personnel with the skills that keep pace with continuing changes in our industry standards and technologies. The inability to hire additional qualified personnel could impair our ability to

11

Table of Contents

satisfy or grow our client base. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in retaining current or future employees.

Our success depends in part on our timely introduction of new products and technologies and our results can be impacted by the effectiveness of our significant investments in new products and technologies

We have made significant investments in our Aria SDS cyber security products and services that may not achieve expected returns. We will continue to make significant investments in research, development, and marketing for Aria products, services, and technologies. Commercial success depends on many factors, including innovativeness, developer support, and effective distribution and marketing. If customers do not perceive our latest offerings as providing significant new functionality or other value, they may reduce their purchases of new software and hardware products or upgrades, unfavorably affecting revenue. We may not achieve significant revenue from new product, service, and distribution channel investments for several years. New products and services may not be profitable, and even if they are profitable, operating margins for some new products and businesses may not be as high as the margins we have experienced historically. Developing new technologies and products is complex. It can require long development and testing periods. Significant delays in new releases or significant problems in creating new products or services could adversely affect our revenue.

We depend on contracts with the federal government, primarily with the Department of Defense ("DoD"), for a significant portion of our revenue, and our business could be seriously harmed if the government significantly decreased or ceased doing business with us.

We derived 4% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2019 and 6% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2018 from the DoD as a subcontractor. We expect that the DoD contracts will continue to be important to our business for the foreseeable future. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government generally, the General Services Administration, or any significant agency in the intelligence community or the DoD, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies were to be impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

To be successful, we must respond to the rapid changes in technology. If we are unable to do so on a timely basis our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to enhance our current products and to develop new commercial products on a timely and cost-effective basis in order to respond to technological developments and changing customer needs. The design-in process is typically lengthy and expensive and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to meet the product specifications of our customers in a timely and adequate manner. In addition, if we fail to anticipate or to respond adequately to changes in technology and customer preferences, or if there is any significant delay in product developments or introductions, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the risk of inventory obsolescence. Because of the complexity of our products, we have experienced delays from time to time in completing products on a timely basis. If we are unable to design, develop or introduce competitive new products on a timely basis, our future operating results would be adversely affected, particularly in our HPP segment. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing new products or enhancing our existing products on a timely or cost-effective basis, or that such new products or product enhancements will achieve market acceptance.

We rely on single sources for supply of certain components and our business may be seriously harmed if our supply of any of these components or other components is disrupted.

Several components used in our HPP products are currently obtained from sole-source suppliers. We are dependent on key vendors like Mellanox Technologies for our high-speed interconnect components. Generally, suppliers may terminate our purchase orders without cause upon 30 days’ notice and may cease offering products to us upon 180 days’ notice. Although we do not consider the risk of interruption of supply to be a significant risk in the near term, if in the future, Mellanox Technologies were to limit or reduce the sale of such components to us, or if these or other

12

Table of Contents

component suppliers, some of which are small companies, were to experience future financial difficulties or other problems which could prevent them from supplying the necessary components, such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These sole source and other suppliers are each subject to quality and performance risks, materials shortages, excess demand, reduction in capacity and other factors that may disrupt the flow of goods to us or our customers, which thereby may adversely affect our business and customer relationships.

We have no guaranteed supply arrangements with our suppliers and there can be no assurance that our suppliers will continue to meet our requirements. If our supply arrangements are interrupted, there can be no assurance that we would be able to find another supplier on a timely or satisfactory basis. Any shortage or interruption in the supply of any of the components used in our products, or the inability to procure these components from alternate sources on acceptable terms, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that severe shortages of components will not occur in the future. Such shortages could increase the cost or delay the shipment of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Significant increases in the prices of these components would also materially adversely affect our financial performance since we may not be able to adjust product pricing to reflect the increase in component costs. We could incur set-up costs and delays in manufacturing should it become necessary to replace any key vendors due to work stoppages, shipping delays, financial difficulties or other factors and, under certain circumstances, these costs and delays could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our international operation is subject to a number of risks.

We market and sell our products in certain international markets and we have established operations in the U.K. The sale of our German operation in fiscal year 2018 is treated as discontinued operations in our 2018 financial statements. Foreign-based revenue is determined based on the location to which the product is shipped or services are rendered and represented 8% and 17% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. If revenues generated by foreign activities are not adequate to offset the expense of establishing and maintaining these foreign activities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, there are certain risks inherent in transacting business internationally, such as changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements, export and import restrictions, export controls relating to technology, tariffs and other trade barriers, longer payment cycles, problems in collecting accounts receivable, political instability, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, expatriation controls and potential adverse tax consequences, any of which could adversely impact the success of our international activities. In particular, it is possible activity in the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe will be adversely impacted and that we will face increased regulatory and legal complexities, including those related to tax, trade, and employee relations as a result of Brexit. A portion of our revenues are from sales to foreign entities, including foreign governments, which are primarily paid in the form of foreign currencies. There can be no assurance that one or more of such factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future international activities and, consequently, on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Systems failures may disrupt our business and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Any systems failures, including network, software or hardware failures, whether caused by us, a third party service provider, unauthorized intruders and hackers, computer viruses, natural disasters, power shortages or terrorist attacks, could cause loss of data or interruptions or delays in our business or that of our clients and reputational harm as a security provider. Like other companies, we have experienced cyber security threats to our data and systems, our company sensitive information, and our information technology infrastructure, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, systems failures and temporary disruptions. We may experience similar security threats at customer sites that we operate and manage as a contractual requirement. Prior cyber attacks directed at us have not had a material adverse impact on our business or our financial results, and we believe that our continuing commitment toward threat detection and mitigation processes and procedures will avoid such impact in the future. Due to the evolving nature of these security threats, however, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted.

13

Table of Contents

In addition, the failure or disruption of our email, communications or utilities could cause us to interrupt or suspend our operations or otherwise harm our business. Our property and business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a result of any system or operational failure or disruption and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The systems and networks that we maintain for our clients, although highly redundant in their design, could also fail. If a system or network we maintain were to fail or experience service interruptions, we might experience loss of revenue or face claims for damages or contract termination. Our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all the damages that we might incur and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We face competition that could adversely affect our sales and profitability.

The markets for our products are highly competitive and are characterized by rapidly changing technology, frequent product performance improvements and evolving industry standards. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than we are and have greater access to capital and human resources and in many cases price their products and services less than ours. In addition, due to the rapidly changing nature of technology, new competitors may emerge. Competitors may be able to offer more attractive pricing or develop products that could offer performance features that are superior to our products, resulting in reduced demand for our products. Such competitors could have a negative impact on our ability to win future business opportunities. There can be no assurance that a new competitor will not attempt to penetrate the various markets for our products and services. Their entry into markets historically targeted by us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business could be adversely affected by changes in budgetary priorities of the federal government.

Because we derive a significant percentage of our revenue from contracts with the federal government, changes in federal government budgetary priorities could directly affect our financial performance. A significant decline in government expenditures, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support or a change in federal government contracting policies could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty or not to exercise options to renew contracts.

In years when Congress does not complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year (September 30), government operations are funded through a continuing resolution ("CR") that temporarily funds federal agencies. Recent CRs have generally provided funding at the levels provided in the previous fiscal year and have not authorized new spending initiatives. When the federal government operates under a CR, delays can occur in the procurement of products and services. Historically, such delays have not had a material effect on our business; however, should funding of the federal government by CR be prolonged or extended, it could have significant consequences to our business and our industry.

Additionally, our business could be seriously affected if changes in DoD priorities reduces the demand for our services on contracts supporting some operations and maintenance activities or if we experience an increase in set-asides for small businesses, which could result in our inability to compete directly for contracts.

U.S. Federal government contracts contain numerous provisions that are unfavorable to us.

U.S. Federal government contracts contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that give the government rights and remedies, some of which are not typically found in commercial contracts, including allowing the government to:

| · |  | cancel multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable;

| · |  | claim rights in systems and software developed by us;

14

Table of Contents

| · |  | suspend or debar us from doing business with the federal government or with a governmental agency;

| · |  | impose fines and penalties and subject us to criminal prosecution; and

| · |  | control or prohibit the export of our data and technology.

If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If the government terminates a contract for default, we may be unable to recover even those amounts, and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source. Depending on the value of a contract, such termination could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

As is common with government contractors, we have experienced and continue to experience occasional performance issues under certain of our contracts. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, a performance problem that impacts our performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We may be unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights which could result in the loss of a competitive advantage.

Our ability to compete effectively against other companies in our industry depends, in part, on our ability to protect our current and future proprietary technology under patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and unfair competition laws. We cannot assure that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate, or that others will not develop technologies similar or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in attempting to protect our proprietary rights.

Also, despite the steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy or reverse-engineer aspects of our products develop similar technology independently or otherwise obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary and we may be unable to successfully identify or prosecute unauthorized uses of our technology. Furthermore, with respect to our issued patents and patent applications, we cannot assure that patents from any pending patent applications (or from any future patent applications) will be issued, that the scope of any patent protection will exclude competitors or provide competitive advantages to us, that any of our patents will be held valid if subsequently challenged or that others will not claim rights in or ownership of the patents (and patent applications) and other proprietary rights held by us.

If we become subject to intellectual property infringement claims, we could incur significant expenses and could be prevented from selling specific products.

We may become subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of others in the future. We cannot assure that, if made, these claims will not be successful. Any claim of infringement could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim even if the claim is invalid, and could distract management from other business. Any judgment against us could require substantial payment in damages and could also include an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from offering certain products.

Our need for continued or increased investment in research and development may increase expenses and reduce our profitability.

Our industry is characterized by the need for continued investment in research and development. If we fail to invest sufficiently in research and development, our products could become less attractive to potential customers and our business and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. As a result of the need to maintain or increase spending levels in this area and the difficulty in reducing costs associated with research and development, our operating results could be materially harmed if our research and development efforts fail to result in new products or if revenues fall below expectations. In addition, as a result of our commitment to invest in research and development, spending levels of research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues may fluctuate in the future.

15

Table of Contents

Our results of operations are subject to fluctuation from period to period and may not be an accurate indication of future performance.

We have experienced fluctuations in operating results in large part due to the sale of products and services in relatively large dollar amounts to a relatively small number of customers. Customers specify delivery date requirements that coincide with their need for our products and services. Because these customers may use our products and services in connection with a variety of defense programs or other projects with different sizes and durations, a customer’s orders for one quarter generally do not indicate a trend for future orders by that customer. As such, we have not been able in the past to consistently predict when our customers will place orders and request shipments so that we cannot always accurately plan our manufacturing, inventory, and working capital requirements. As a result, if orders and shipments differ from what we predict, we may incur additional expenses and build excess inventory, which may require additional reserves and allowances and reduce our working capital and operational flexibility. Any significant change in our customers’ purchasing patterns could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and reported earnings per share for a particular quarter. Thus, results of operations in any period should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

High quarterly book-ship ratios may pressure inventory and cash flow management, necessitating increased inventory balances to ensure quarterly revenue attainment. Increased inventory balances tie up additional capital, limiting our operational flexibility. Some of our customers may have become conditioned to wait until the end of a quarter to place orders in the expectation of receiving a discount. Customers conditioned to seek quarter-end discounts increase risk and uncertainty in our financial forecasting and decrease our margins and profitability.

Our quarterly results may be subject to fluctuations resulting from a number of other factors, including:

| · |  | delays in completion of internal product development projects;

| · |  | delays in shipping hardware and software;

| · |  | delays in acceptance testing by customers;

| · |  | a change in the mix of products sold to our served markets;

| · |  | changes in customer order patterns;

| · |  | production delays due to quality problems with outsourced components;

| · |  | inability to scale quick reaction capability products due to low product volume;

| · |  | shortages and costs of components;

| · |  | the timing of product line transitions;

| · |  | declines in quarterly revenues from previous generations of products following announcement of replacement products containing more advanced technology;

| · |  | inability to realize the expected benefits from acquisitions and restructurings, or delays in realizing such benefits;

| · |  | potential asset impairment, including goodwill and intangibles, write-off of deferred tax assets or restructuring charges; and

| · |  | changes in estimates of completion on fixed price service engagements.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, from time to time, we have entered into contracts, referred to as development contracts, to engineer a specific solution based on modifications to standard products. Gross margins from development contract revenues are typically lower than gross margins from standard product revenues. We intend to continue to enter into development contracts and anticipate that the gross margins associated with development contract revenues will continue to be lower than gross margins from standard product sales.

Another factor contributing to fluctuations in our quarterly results is the fixed nature of expenditures on personnel, facilities and marketing programs. Expense levels for these programs are based, in significant part, on expectations of future revenues. If actual quarterly revenues are below management’s expectations, our results of operations will likely be adversely affected. Further, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and changes in estimates in subsequent periods could cause our results of operations to fluctuate.

Changes in regulations could materially adversely affect us.

Our business, results of operations, or financial condition could be materially adversely affected if laws, regulations, or standards relating to us or our products are newly implemented or changed. In addition, our compliance with existing regulations may have a material adverse impact on us. Under applicable federal securities laws, we are required to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures. If we have a material weakness in our internal controls, our results of operations or financial condition may be materially adversely affected or our stock price may decline.

If we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem, we may not be able to recover successfully, which could cause material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm, or legal liability.

If we experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, such as a hurricane, earthquake, terrorist attack, pandemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend, in part, on the availability of our personnel, our office facilities, and the proper functioning of our computer, telecommunication and other related systems and operations. As we attempt to grow our operations, the potential for particular types of natural or man-made disasters, political, economic or infrastructure instabilities, or other country- or region-specific business continuity risks increases.

If we suffer any data breaches involving the designs, schematics, or source code for our products or other sensitive information, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.

We securely store our designs, schematics, and source code for our products as they are created. A breach, whether physical, electronic or otherwise, of the systems on which this sensitive data is stored could lead to damage or piracy of our products. If we are subject to data security breaches from external sources or from an insider threat, we may have a loss in sales or increased costs arising from the restoration or implementation of additional security measures, either of which could adversely affect our business and financial results. Other potential costs could include loss of brand value, incident response costs, loss of stock market value, regulatory inquiries, litigation, and management distraction. In addition, a security breach that involved classified information could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, loss of a government contract, loss of access to classified information, or debarment as a government contractor. Similarly, a breach that involved loss of customer-provided data could subject us to loss of a customer, loss of a contract, litigation costs and legal damages, and reputational harm.

17

Table of Contents

We need to continue to expend resources on research and development ("R&D") efforts, particularly our HPP segment, to meet the needs of our customers. If we are unable to do so, our products could become less attractive to customers and our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our industry requires a continued investment in R&D. As a result of our need to maintain or increase our spending levels for R&D in this area and the difficulty in reducing costs associated with R&D, our operating results could be materially harmed if our revenues fall below expectations. In addition, as a result of CSPI’s commitment to invest in R&D, spending as a percent of revenues may fluctuate in the future. Further, if we fail to invest sufficiently in R&D or our R&D does not produce competitive results, our products may become less attractive to our customers or potential customers, which could materially harm our business and results of operations.

Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over financial reporting.

Effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are necessary for us to provide reliable financial and other reports and effectively prevent fraud. These types of controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the proper preparation of our financial statements, as well as regarding the timely reporting of material information. If we cannot maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, or provide reliable financial statements or SEC reports or prevent fraud, investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information, our common stock could be subject to delisting on the stock exchange where it is traded, our operating results and the trading price of our common stock could suffer and we might become subject to litigation.

While our management will continue to review the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, there is no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives, including the prevention and detection of fraud, all of the time.

Our stock price may continue to be volatile

Historically, the market for technology stocks has been extremely volatile. Our common stock has experienced and may continue to experience substantial price volatility. The following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly:

| · |  | loss of a major customer;

| · |  | loss of a major supplier;

| · |  | the addition or departure of key personnel;

| · |  | variations in our quarterly operating results;

| · |  | announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products or product enhancements;

| · |  | acquisitions, distribution partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

| · |  | regulatory changes;

| · |  | sales of our common stock or other securities in the future;

| · |  | changes in market valuations of technology companies; and

| · |  | fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes.

18

Table of Contents

In addition, the stock market in general and the NASDAQ Global Market and technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against such companies. If any shareholders were to issue a lawsuit, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit and the attention of management could be diverted.

Item 2. Properties

Listed below are our principal facilities as of September 30, 2019. Management considers all facilities listed below to be suitable for the purpose(s) for which they are used, including manufacturing, research and development, sales, marketing, service and administration.

|  |  |  | Owned |  |
|  |  |  | or |  | Approximate
Location |  | Principal Use |  | Leased |  | Floor Area
TS Segment Properties: |  |  |  |  |  |
Modcomp, Inc. |  | Division Headquarters |  | Leased |  | 11,815 S.F.
1182 East Newport Center Drive |  | Sales, Marketing and |  |  |  |
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442 |  | Administration |  |  |  |
Modcomp, Ltd. |  | Sales, Marketing and |  | Leased |  | 887 S.F.
Trinity Court, Molly Millars Lane |  | Administration |  |  |  |
Wokingham, Berkshire |  |  |  |  |  |
United Kingdom |  |  |  |  |  |
HPP Segment Properties: |  |  |  |  |  |
CSP Inc. |  | Corporate Headquarters |  | Leased |  | 13,515 S.F.
175 Cabot Street, Suite 210 |  | Manufacturing, Sales, |  |  |  |
Lowell, MA 01854 |  | Marketing and |  |  |  |
|  | Administration |  |  |  |

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

19

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market information. Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol CSPI. The following table provides the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market for the periods indicated.

|  | 2019 |  | 2018
Fiscal Year: |  | High |  | Low |  | High |  | Low
1st Quarter |  | $ | 13.45 |  | $ | 8.78 |  | $ | 17.00 |  | $ | 10.60
2nd Quarter |  | $ | 11.92 |  | $ | 9.31 |  | $ | 18.89 |  | $ | 10.41
3rd Quarter |  | $ | 15.50 |  | $ | 10.30 |  | $ | 12.18 |  | $ | 8.75
4th Quarter |  | $ | 15.18 |  | $ | 12.21 |  | $ | 14.87 |  | $ | 9.71

Stockholders. We had approximately 65 holders of record of our common stock as of December 3, 2019. This number does not include stockholders for whom shares were held in a “nominee” or “street” name. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our shares of common stock (including shares held in street name) at that date was approximately 1,450.

Dividends. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company declared and paid cash dividends as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount Paid
Fiscal Year |  | Date Declared |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Per Share
2018 |  | 12/19/2017 |  | 12/29/2017 |  | 1/16/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 2/12/2018 |  | 2/28/2018 |  | 3/16/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 5/9/2018 |  | 5/31/2018 |  | 6/15/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 8/13/2018 |  | 8/31/2018 |  | 9/14/2018 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 12/27/2018 |  | 1/7/2019 |  | 1/22/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 2/12/2019 |  | 2/28/2019 |  | 3/14/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 5/8/2019 |  | 5/31/2019 |  | 6/14/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 8/7/2019 |  | 8/30/2019 |  | 9/13/2019 |  | $ | 0.15

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and other portions of this filing contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking information. You should review the “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections of this annual report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this filing.

Overview of Fiscal 2019 Results of Continuing Operations

Revenue increased by approximately $6.2 million, or 8%, to $79.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 versus $72.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018.

Our gross profit margin percentage decreased overall, from 25% of revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 to 23% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

20

Table of Contents

We generated an operating loss of approximately $0.8 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to an operating loss of approximately $1.6 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2018.

On July 31, 2018, we completed the sale of all the outstanding stock of our Germany division of our TS segment. The one time gain recorded due to the sale of all the stock of Modcomp GmbH was approximately $16.8 million. No income taxes were provided as the transaction was a tax-free exchange in the U.K. The Modcomp GmbH’s results have been recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.

The following table details our results of operations in dollars and as a percentage of sales for the fiscal years ended:

|  |  |  |  | % |  |  |  |  | % |
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | of sales |  | September 30, 2018 |  | of sales |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Sales |  | $ | 79,061 |  | 100 | % | $ | 72,916 |  | 100 | %
Costs and expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cost of sales |  |  | 61,035 |  | 77 | % |  | 54,517 |  | 75 | %
Engineering and development |  |  | 2,800 |  | 4 | % |  | 3,277 |  | 4 | %
Selling, general and administrative |  |  | 16,052 |  | 20 | % |  | 16,723 |  | 23 | %
Total costs and expenses |  |  | 79,887 |  | 101 | % |  | 74,517 |  | 102 | %
Operating loss |  |  | (826) |  | (1) | % |  | (1,601) |  | (2) | %
Other income |  |  | 384 |  | — | % |  | 495 |  | 1 | %
Loss before income taxes |  |  | (442) |  | (1) | % |  | (1,106) |  | (2) | %
Income tax (benefit) expense |  |  | (71) |  | — | % |  | 882 |  | 1 | %
Net loss from continuing operations |  |  | (371) |  | (1) | % |  | (1,988) |  | (3) | %
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  | — | % |  | 16,838 |  | 23 | %
Net loss from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  | — | % |  | (410) |  | (1) | %
Total income from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  | — | % |  | 16,428 |  | 22 | %
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (371) |  | (1) | % | $ | 14,440 |  | 19 | %

Revenues

Revenue increased by approximately $6.2 million, or 8%, to $79.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 versus $72.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018. Our HPP segment revenue decreased by approximately $2.6 million primarily due to a decline of $1.7 million in royalty revenues, a decline of $0.2 million in Multicomputer service revenues, and a decline of $1.6 million in Myricom product revenues, partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in Multicomputer product revenues. Our TS segment revenue increased by approximately $8.7 million from an increase of $11.5 million in our U.S. division, partially offset with a decrease of $2.8 million in our U.K. division.

TS segment revenue change by product and services lines for the fiscal years ended September 30 were as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Increase |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | $ |  | % |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Products |  | $ | 59,611 |  | $ | 52,647 |  | $ | 6,964 |  | 13 | %
Services |  |  | 11,548 |  |  | 9,790 |  |  | 1,758 |  | 18 | %
Total |  | $ | 71,159 |  | $ | 62,437 |  | $ | 8,722 |  | 14 | %

The TS segment total revenue increased by approximately $8.7 million due to an increase of $11.5 million in our U.S. division partially offset by a decrease of $2.8 million in our U.K. division. The $7.0 million increase in TS

21

Table of Contents

segment product revenue is attributed to an increase of $9.5 million in our U.S. division offset by a decrease of $2.5 million in our U.K. division. The increase in our U.S. division was primarily associated with two major customers and the decrease in the U.K. division was primarily associated with a decrease with one major customer. The $1.8 million service revenue increase is related to an increase in the U.S. division of $2.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in the U.K. division of $0.2 million.

HPP segment revenue change by product and services lines for the fiscal years ended September 30 were as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Decrease |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | $ |  | % |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Products |  | $ | 6,406 |  | $ | 7,014 |  | $ | (608) |  | (9) | %
Services |  |  | 1,496 |  |  | 3,465 |  |  | (1,969) |  | (57) | %
Total |  | $ | 7,902 |  | $ | 10,479 |  | $ | (2,577) |  | (25) | %

The decrease in HPP product revenues for the period of $0.6 million was primarily the result of an approximately $1.5 million decrease in Myricom product line shipments, partially offset by an increase in Multicomputer product line shipments of approximately $0.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018. The decrease in HPP services revenues of approximately $2.0 million for the period was primarily the result of an approximately $1.7 million decrease in royalty revenues on high-speed processing boards related to the E2D program during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018.

Our total revenues by geographic area based on the location to which the products were shipped or services rendered were as follows:

|  |  |  | Increase (Decrease) |
|  | 2019 |  | % |  | 2018 |  | % |  | $ |  | % |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Americas |  | $ | 72,522 |  | 92 | % | $ | 60,458 |  | 83 | % | $ | 12,064 |  | 20 | %
Europe |  |  | 4,056 |  | 5 | % |  | 10,325 |  | 14 | % |  | (6,269) |  | (61) | %
Asia |  |  | 2,483 |  | 3 | % |  | 2,133 |  | 3 | % |  | 350 |  | 16 | %
Totals |  | $ | 79,061 |  | 100 | % | $ | 72,916 |  | 100 | % | $ | 6,145 |  | 8 | %

The $12.1 million increase in the Americas revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 is primarily due to increased revenues by our TS segment of approximately $15.2 million, partially offset with decreased sales by our HPP segment of approximately $3.1 million. The $6.3 million decrease in Europe revenue is primarily due to decreased sales by our UK division of approximately $5.5 million combined with a decrease by our TS segment’s US division of approximately $0.3 million and a decrease in our HPP segment of approximately $0.5 million. The decrease in sales to Europe is due to one large customer that had significantly lower activity for the year ended September 30, 2019 when compared to September 30, 2018. The $0.4 million increase in Asia is primarily the result of increased revenues by our HPP segment of $1.1 million partially offset with a $0.7 million decrease in our TS segment.

Gross Margins

Our gross margins ("GM") decreased by approximately $0.4 million to $18.0 million in fiscal year 2019 as compared to gross margins of $18.4 million in fiscal year 2018.

22

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes GM changes by segment for fiscal years 2019 and 2018:

|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | Increase (Decrease) |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |
TS |  | $ | 13,889 |  | 20 | % | $ | 12,262 |  | 20 | % | $ | 1,627 |  | — | %
HPP |  |  | 4,137 |  | 52 | % |  | 6,137 |  | 59 | % |  | (2,000) |  | (7) | %
Total |  | $ | 18,026 |  | 23 | % | $ | 18,399 |  | 25 | % | $ | (373) |  | (2) | %

The impact of product mix within our TS segment on gross margins for the fiscal years ended September 30 was as follows:

|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | Increase |
|  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Products |  | $ | 7,462 |  | 13 | % | $ | 6,886 |  | 13 | % | $ | 576 |  | — | %
Services |  |  | 6,427 |  | 56 | % |  | 5,376 |  | 55 | % |  | 1,051 |  | 1 | %
Total |  | $ | 13,889 |  | 20 | % | $ | 12,262 |  | 20 | % | $ | 1,627 |  | — | %

The overall TS segment gross margin as a percentage of sales remained the same in fiscal year 2019 when compared to fiscal year 2018. The $0.6 million increase in our TS segment product gross margins resulted from an increase in product revenues in the U.S. division, partially offset by a decrease in the U.K division. The $1.1 million increase in the TS segment service gross margins primarily resulted from increased service revenues in the U.S. division.

The impact of product mix on gross margins within our HPP segment for the fiscal years ended September 30 was as follows:

|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | Increase (Decrease) |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |  | GM$ |  | GM% |
Products |  | $ | 2,719 |  | 42 | % | $ | 2,775 |  | 40 | % | $ | (56) |  | 2 | %
Services |  |  | 1,418 |  | 95 | % |  | 3,362 |  | 97 | % |  | (1,944) |  | (2) | %
Total |  | $ | 4,137 |  | 52 | % | $ | 6,137 |  | 59 | % | $ | (2,000) |  | (7) | %

The overall HPP segment gross margins as a percentage of sales decreased to 52% in fiscal year 2019 from 59% in fiscal year 2018. The 7% decrease in gross margin as a percentage of sales in the HPP segment was primarily attributed to the impact of a decrease of $1.7 million in high margin Multicomputer royalty revenues.

Engineering and Development Expenses

The following table details our engineering and development expenses by operating segment for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:

|  | For the Year ended September 30, |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | % of |  |  |  |  | % of |  |  |  |  |  |
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |  | 2019 |  | Total |  | 2018 |  | Total |  | $ Decrease |  | % Decrease |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
By Operating Segment: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
TS |  | $ | — |  | — | % | $ | — |  | — | % | $ | — |  | — | %
HPP |  |  | 2,800 |  | 100 | % |  | 3,277 |  | 100 | % |  | (477) |  | (15) | %
Total |  | $ | 2,800 |  | 100 | % | $ | 3,277 |  | 100 | % | $ | (477) |  | (15) | %

Engineering and development expenses decreased by $0.5 million to $2.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to $3.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018. The current fiscal year expenses were primarily for product engineering expenses incurred in connection with the development of the new

23

Table of Contents

ARIA SDS cyber security products. The decreased engineering and development expenses for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 is primarily attributed to a decrease in consulting related expenses.

Selling, General and Administrative

The following table details our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses by operating segment for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:

|  | For the year ended September 30, |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | % of |  |  |  |  | % of |  | $ Increase |  | % Increase |
|  | 2019 |  | Total |  | 2018 |  | Total |  | (Decrease) |  | (Decrease) |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
By Operating Segment: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
TS segment |  | $ | 11,630 |  | 72 | % | $ | 11,086 |  | 66 | % | $ | 544 |  | 5 | %
HPP segment |  |  | 4,422 |  | 28 | % |  | 5,637 |  | 34 | % |  | (1,215) |  | (22) | %
Total |  | $ | 16,052 |  | 100 | % | $ | 16,723 |  | 100 | % | $ | (671) |  | (4) | %

For fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, the TS segment SG&A spending increase of approximately $0.5 million is substantially the result of an increase in our U.S. division of $1.2 million primarily attributed to variable selling expenses and additional engineering and sales hires. This was partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in the U.K. division attributed to reduction in staff and variable compensation expense.

For fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, the HPP segment SG&A spending decrease of $1.2 million is primarily attributed to decreases in expenses related to the sale of our German operations, audit expenses, and variable compensation.

Other Income/Expenses

The following table details our other income/expenses for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:

|  | For the year ended |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Increase |
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018 |  | (Decrease) |
|  | (Amounts in thousands) |
Interest expense |  | $ | (99) |  | $ | (85) |  | $ | (14) |
Interest income |  |  | 323 |  |  | 20 |  |  | 303 |
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |  |  | 157 |  |  | 263 |  |  | (106) |
Other income, net |  |  | 3 |  |  | 297 |  |  | (294) |
Total other income (expense), net |  | $ | 384 |  | $ | 495 |  | $ | (111) |

The decrease to other income (expenses) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 was primarily driven by a decrease in Other income, net of $0.3 million and a decrease of $0.1 million foreign exchange gain (loss), partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in interest income.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $71 thousand, which reflected an effective tax rate of 16.1% for the year ended September 30, 2019. The tax benefit includes an increase in the valuation allowance for net operating losses for state income tax related in the High Performance Products segment where we also had a reversal of the uncertain tax position of $54 thousand as that the statute of limitations have expired. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the income tax expense was approximately $882 thousand, which reflected an effective tax rate of (79.7%). The impact of the Tax Reform Act, which was recorded in fiscal year 2018, included remeasurement of the Company’s US deferred tax assets and liabilities to a 24.3% for current and 21% for the non-current portions resulted in

24

Table of Contents

a tax expense of approximately $588 thousand consisting of a reduction of the Company’s net deferred tax asset. The Company recorded tax expense of approximately $771 thousand related to the deemed repatriation.

As of September 30, 2019, management assessed the positive and negative evidence in the U.S. operations, and estimated that we will have sufficient future taxable income to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. Significant objective positive evidence included the cumulative profits that we realized in recent fiscal years. This evidence enhances our ability to consider other subjective evidence such as our projections for future growth. Other factors that we considered are the likelihood for continued royalty income in future years, new product revenue from cyber security products, and our expectation that the TS segment will continue to be profitable in future years. On the basis of this evaluation, as of September 30, 2019, we have concluded that our U.S. deferred income tax asset related to net operating losses carryforward for the High Performance Products segment is more likely than not to be realized except for certain state net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carry forwards. We recorded a $235 thousand valuation allowance for certain state-related assets that are not likely to be realized. It should be noted however, that the amount of the deferred tax asset not to be realized could be adjusted in future years, if estimates of taxable income during the carryforward periods are increased, or if there is objective positive evidence in the form of cumulative earnings.

We also continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.K. deferred tax assets as we have experienced cumulative losses and do not have any indication that the operation will be profitable in the future to an extent that will allow us to utilize much of our net operating loss carryforwards. To the extent that actual experience deviates from our assumptions, our projections would be affected and hence our assessment of realizability of our deferred tax assets may change.

Results of Discontinued Operations

CSPi LTD, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, sold all of the outstanding stock of Modcomp GmbH to Reply AG, an affiliate of Reply SpA, a holding company for a worldwide group of companies, on July 31, 2018 for $14.4 million cash, and recognized a gain of $16.8 million. The divestiture of CSPi’s German operations and our increased cash position will enable us to focus time and resources on our higher-margin and greater-potential growth opportunities. We are encouraged by the traction of our managed services business in the U.S. and we intend to continue to invest and focus on our new ARIA SDS cyber security products and to capitalize on the proliferation of our wireless service business. This divestiture of our German operations is another positive step toward our future growth.

The following table is a summary of the operating results of the Germany division of our TS segment which have been reflected as discontinued operations. See Note 2 for additional information.

|  | For the year ended
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Revenues |  | $ | — |  | $ | 18,365
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |  | $ | — |  | $ | (410)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of liquidity is our cash and cash equivalents, which decreased by approximately $7 million to $18.1 million as of September 30, 2019 from $25.1 million as of September 30, 2018.

Significant sources of cash for the year ended September 30, 2019 included an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $6.4 million, proceeds from debt of approximately $1.0 million, and a decrease in refundable income taxes of approximately $0.6 million. More than offsetting these significant sources of cash were an increase in long term receivables of approximately $5.3 million, an increase in other assets and deferred costs of approximately $3.1 million, an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $2.1 million, and payment of dividends of approximately $2.5 million.

25

Table of Contents

C ash held by our foreign subsidiary in the United Kingdom totaled approximately $9.1 million as of September 30, 2019, which consists of 3.1 million euros, 0.2 million British Pounds, and 5.9 million U.S. Dollars. This cash is included in our total cash and cash equivalents reported above.

As of September 30, 2018, the Company maintained a line of credit that allows for borrowings of up to $1.0 million. Availability under the facility was reduced by outstanding borrowings thereunder. The interest rates on outstanding borrowings was London Inter-Bank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.5%, with a floor of 4%. Borrowings under the credit agreements are required to be repaid on demand in certain circumstances, upon termination of the agreements, or may be prepaid by the Company without penalty. The Company had no amounts outstanding under the line of credit at September 30, 2018. This line of credit closed during fiscal year 2019.

As of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, the Company also maintained an inventory line of credit that may be used by the TS segment in the U.S. to purchase inventory from approved vendors with payment terms which exceed those offered by the vendors. In fiscal year 2019, HPP gained access to this inventory line of credit, but did not use it. No interest accrues under the inventory line of credit when advances are paid within terms, however, late payments are subject to an interest charge of Prime plus 5%. The credit agreement for the inventory line of credit contains financial covenants which require the Company to maintain the following TS segment-specific financial ratios: (1) a minimum current ratio of 1.2, (2) tangible net worth of no less than $4.0 million, and (3) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to total net worth of less than 5.0:1. As of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, Company borrowings under the inventory line of credit were $2.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

For more information, please refer to Note 16 - Lines of Credit, in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10‑K.

If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy working capital requirements, we may need to access funds through bank loans, the equity markets, or other means. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise any such capital on terms acceptable to us, on a timely basis or at all. If we are unable to secure additional financing, we may not be able to complete development or enhancement of products, take advantage of future opportunities, respond to competition or continue to effectively operate our business.

Based on our current plans and business conditions, management believes that the Company’s available cash and cash equivalents, the cash generated from operations and availability on our lines of credit will be sufficient to provide for the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to uncollectible receivables, inventory valuation, goodwill and intangibles, income taxes, deferred compensation, revenue recognition, retirement plans, restructuring costs and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical performance and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements: revenue recognition; valuation allowances, specifically the allowance for doubtful accounts and net deferred tax asset valuation allowance; inventory valuation; intangibles; and pension and retirement plans.

26

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Effective October 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for effects of initial adoption. The following reflects the accounting policy change for revenue starting on the date of adoption:

We derive revenue from the sale of integrated hardware and software, third-party service contracts, professional services, managed services, financing of hardware and software, and other services.

We recognize revenue from hardware upon transfer of control, which is at a point in time typically upon shipment when title transfers. Revenue from software is recognized at a point in time when the license is granted.

We recognize revenue from third-party service contracts as either gross sales or net sales depending on whether the Company is acting as a principal party to the transaction or simply acting as an agent or broker based on control and timing. The Company is a principal if it controls the good or service before that good or service is transferred to the customer. We record revenue as gross when the Company is a principal party to the arrangement and net of cost when we are acting as a broker or agent. Under gross sales recognition, the entire selling price is recorded in revenue and our cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded in cost of goods sold. Under net sales recognition, the cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded as a reduction to revenue resulting in net sales equal to the gross profit on the transaction. Third-party service contracts are sold in different combinations with hardware, software, and services. We have determined the third-party services contracts are a single performance obligation in each sale. When the Company is an agent, revenue is typically recorded at a point in time. When the Company is the principal, revenue is recognized over the contract term.

Professional services generally include implementation, installation, and training services. Professional services are considered a series of distinct services that form one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as services are performed.

Revenue generated from managed services is recognized over the term of the contract. Certain managed services contracts include financing of hardware and software. Revenues from arrangements which include financing are allocated considering relative standalone selling prices of lease and non-lease components within the agreement. The lease components include the hardware and software, which are subject to ASC 840. The non-lease component includes the managed services and is subject to ASC 606.

Other services generally include revenue generated through our royalty, extended warranty, multicomputer repair, and maintenance contracts. Royalty revenue is sales-based and recognized on date of subsequent sale of the product, which occurs on the date of customer shipment. Revenue from extended warranty contracts is recognized evenly over the period of the warranty. Multicomputer repair services revenue is recognized upon control transfer when the customer takes possession of the computer at time of shipping. Revenue generated from maintenance services is recognized evenly over the term of the contract.

Variable consideration is immaterial. Any products sold with right to return exists with the manufacturer. Managed service contracts contain the right to refund if canceled within 30 days of inception. Any products with a standard warranty are treated as a warranty obligation under ASC 460, Guarantees.

The following policies are applicable to our major categories of segment revenue transactions:

TS Segment Revenue

TS Segment revenue is derived from the sale of hardware, software, professional services, third-party service contracts, maintenance contracts, managed services, and financing of hardware and software. Financing revenue is

27

Table of Contents

recognized in accordance with ASC 840, Leases. Financing revenue is recorded in revenue as equipment leasing and is part of the Company’s operations.

Third-party service contracts are evaluated to determine whether such service revenue should be recorded as gross sales or net and whether over time or at point in time.

HPP Segment Revenue

HPP segment revenue is derived from the sale of integrated hardware and software, maintenance, and other services through the Multicomputer and Myricom product lines.

Myricom revenue is derived from the sale of products, which are comprised of both hardware and embedded software which is essential to the products functionality, and post contract maintenance and support. Post contract maintenance and support is considered immaterial in the context of the contract and therefore is not a separate performance obligation.

Significant Judgments

The input method using labor hours expended relative to the total expected hours is used to recognize revenue for professional services. Only the hours that depict the Company’s performance toward satisfying a performance obligation are used for progress. An estimate for professional services is made at the beginning of each contract based on prior experience and monitored throughout the services. This method is most appropriate as it depicts the measure of progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligation.

When product and services are sold together, the allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation is calculated using a budgeted cost-plus margin approach. Due to the complex nature of these contracts, there is significant judgment in allocating the transaction price. These estimates are periodically reviewed by project managers, engineers, and other staff involved to ensure estimates are appropriate. For items sold separately, including hardware, software, professional services, maintenance contracts, other services, and third-party service contracts, there is no allocation performed as there is one performance obligation.

Contract Assets and Liabilities

When the Company has performed work but does not have an unconditional right to payment, a contract asset is recorded. When the Company has the right to bill a customer, accounts receivable is recorded as an unconditional right exists. Contract liabilities arise when payment is received before the Company transfers a good or service to the customer.

Contract Costs

Incremental costs of obtaining a contract involving customer transactions where the revenue and the related transfer of goods and services are less than a one-year period, are expensed as incurred, utilizing the practical expedient in ASC 340‑40‑25‑4. For a period greater than one year, incremental contract costs are capitalized if the Company expects to recover these costs. These costs are only capitalized if the contract is obtained. The costs are amortized over the contract term and expected renewal periods. The period of amortization is generally three to six years. Incremental costs are related to commissions in the TS portion of the business.

Costs to fulfill a contract are capitalized when the costs are related to a contract or anticipated contract, generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying performance obligations in the future, and costs are recoverable. Costs to fulfill a contract are related to the TS portion of the business and involve activities performed before managed services can be completed. Current capitalized fulfillment costs are in the account other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

28

Table of Contents

Other

Projects are typically billed upon completion or at certain milestones. Product and services are typically billed when shipped or as services are being performed. Payment terms are typically 30 days to pay in full except in Europe where it could be up to 90 days. There are certain contracts that do contain a financing component. See Note 3 for details. Most of the Company’s contracts are less than one year. As a practical expedient, the Company has elected not to adjust the amount of consideration for effects of a significant financing component when it is anticipated the promised good or service will be transferred and the subsequent payment will be one year or less. The Company elected to use the optional exemption to not disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that have an original expected duration of one year or less. This is due to a low amount of performance obligations less than one year being unsatisfied at each period end. Most of these contracts are related to product sales. The Company has certain contracts that have an original term of more than one year. The royalty agreement is longer than one year and managed service contracts are generally longer than one year.

Product Warranty Accrual

Our product sales generally include a 90‑day to three-year hardware warranty. At time of product shipment, we accrue for the estimated cost to repair or replace potentially defective products. Estimated warranty costs are based upon prior actual warranty costs for substantially similar products.

Engineering and Development Expenses

Engineering and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation and other headcount-related expenses associated with product development. Engineering and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs. We consider technological feasibility for our software products to be reached upon the release of the software, accordingly, no internal software development costs have been capitalized.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We also reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. This methodology requires estimates and judgments in the determination of the recoverability of deferred tax assets and in the calculation of certain tax liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded against the gross deferred tax assets that management believes, after considering all available positive and negative objective evidence, historical and prospective, with greater weight given to historical evidence, that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized.

In addition, we are required to recognize in the consolidated financial statements, those tax positions determined to be more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the positions as of the reporting date. If a tax position is not considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are recognized.

In addition, the calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. The Company records liabilities for estimated tax obligations in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions. These estimated tax liabilities include the provision for taxes that may become payable in the future.

29

Table of Contents

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that are not subject to amortization are also required to be tested annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. We did not have intangible assets with indefinite lives at any time during the two years ended September 30, 2019. Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally three to ten years, and are carried at net book value. The remaining useful lives of intangible assets are evaluated on an annual basis. Intangible assets subject to amortization are also tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the fair value of an intangible asset subject to amortization is determined to be less than its carrying value, then an impairment charge is recorded to write down that asset to its fair value.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. The recoverability of inventories is based upon the types and levels of inventories held, forecasted demand, pricing, competition and changes in technology. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Pension and Retirement Plans

The funded status of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans is recognized prospectively on the consolidated balance sheet. Gains and losses, prior service costs and credits and any remaining transition amounts that have not yet been recognized through pension expense will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic pension/post-retirement benefits expense. Additionally, plan assets and obligations are measured as of our fiscal year-end balance sheet date (September 30).

We have defined benefit and defined contribution plans in the U.K. and in the U.S. In the U.K., the Company provides defined benefit pension plans for certain employees and former employees and defined contribution plans for the majority of the employees. The defined benefit plans in the U.K. are closed to newly hired employees and have been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. In the U.S., the Company provides defined contribution plans that cover most employees and supplementary retirement plans to certain employees and former employees who are now retired. These supplementary retirement plans are also closed to newly hired employees and have been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. These supplementary plans are funded through whole life insurance policies. The Company expects to recover all insurance premiums paid under these policies in the future, through the cash surrender value of the policies and any death benefits or portions thereof to be paid upon the death of the participant. These whole life insurance policies are carried on the balance sheet at their cash surrender values as they are owned by the Company and not assets of the defined benefit plans. In the U.S., the Company also provides for officer death benefits and post-retirement health insurance benefits through supplemental post-retirement plans to certain officers. The Company also funds these supplemental plans’ obligations through whole life insurance policies on the officers.

Pension expense is based on an actuarial computation of current future benefits using estimates for expected return on assets, expected compensation increases and applicable discount rates. Management has reviewed the discount rates and rates of return with our consulting actuaries and investment advisers and concluded they were reasonable. A decrease in the expected return on pension assets would increase pension expense. Expected compensation increases are estimated based on historical and expected increases in the future. Increases in estimated compensation increases would result in higher pension expense while decreases would lower pension expense. Discount rates are selected based upon rates of return on high quality fixed income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefit. A decrease in the discount rate would result in greater pension expense while an increase in the discount rate would decrease pension expense.

30

Table of Contents

The Company funds its pension plans in amounts sufficient to meet the requirements set forth in applicable employee benefits laws and local tax laws. Liabilities for amounts in excess of these funding levels are accrued and reported in the consolidated balance sheets.

Inflation and Changing Prices

Management does not believe that inflation and changing prices had significant impact on sales, revenues or income during fiscal years 2019 or 2018. There is no assurance that the Company’s business will not be materially and adversely affected by inflation and changing prices in the future.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The consolidated financial statements are included herein.

| Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 38
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2019 and 2018 | 39
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 | 40
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 | 41
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 | 42
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 | 43
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 44

31

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2019. Our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and other members of our senior management team supervised and participated in this evaluation. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a‑15(e) and 15d‑15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ("SEC") rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2019, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rule 13a‑15(f) under the Exchange Act, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of a company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by a company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. It includes those policies and procedures that:

| · |  | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of a company;

| · |  | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of a company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of directors of a company; and

| · |  | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of a company’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2019. In making its assessment of internal control, management used the criteria described in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") of the Treadway Commission. As a result of its assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2019.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls

32

Table of Contents

may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This Annual Report on Form 10‑K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2019 was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that call for the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned “Nominees for Election”, “Our Board of Directors”, “Our Executive Officers”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Corporate Governance” in our Schedule 14A Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned “Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Compensation of Non-Employee Directors” in our Schedule 14A Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.

The equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders consist of the CSP, Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") and the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. In fiscal 2019 and 2018, the Company granted to certain key employees, certain officers including its Chief Executive Officer and non-employee directors’ shares of non-vested common stock instead of stock options. The vesting periods for the key employees’, officers’, the Chief Executive Officer’s and the non-employee directors’ non-vested stock awards are four years, three years and one year, respectively. The following

33

Table of Contents

table sets forth information as of September 30, 2019 regarding the total number of securities outstanding under these equity compensation plans.

|  | (a) (1)(2) |  | (b) |  | (c)
|  |  |  |  |  | Number of securities
|  |  |  |  |  | remaining available for future
|  | Number of securities to be |  | Weighted-average |  | issuance under equity
|  | issued upon exercise of |  | exercise price of outstanding |  | compensation plans (excluding
|  | outstanding options, |  | stock options, warrants and |  | securities reflected in column
Plan Category |  | warrants and rights |  | rights |  | (a))(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |  | 192,735 |  | $ | 3.75 |  | 417,668

| (1) |  | Includes 190,735 non-vested shares issued and 2,000 stock options issued.

| (2) |  | Does not include purchase rights under the ESPP, as the purchase price and number of shares to be purchased under the ESPP are not determined until the end of the relevant purchase period.

| (3) |  | Includes 320,715 shares available for future issuance under the stock incentive and stock option plans and 96,953 under the ESPP.

We incorporate additional information required by this Item by reference to the section captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Schedule 14A Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the section captioned “Corporate Governance” in our Schedule 14A Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned “Fees for Professional Services” and “Pre-approval Policies and Procedures” in our Schedule 14A Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) (1) Financial statements filed as part of this report:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2019 and 2018

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

34

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2) Financial statement schedules

All other financial statements and schedules not listed have been omitted since the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto included in Item 8, or is not applicable, material or required.

(3) Exhibits

|  |  |  |  |  | Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No. |  | Description |  | Filed with this Form 10‑K |  | Form |  | Filing Date |  | Exhibit No.
3.1 |  | Articles of Organization and amendments thereto |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 26, 2007 |  | 3.1
3.2 |  | By-laws, as amended December 13, 2012 |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 20, 2012 |  | 3.2
10.1 |  | Form of Employee Invention and Non-Disclosure Agreement |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | November 22, 1996 |  | 10.3
10.2 |  | CSPI Supplemental Retirement Income Plan |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 29, 2008 |  | 10.2
10.3* |  | 2007 Stock Incentive Plan |  |  |  | DEF 14A |  | March 30, 2007 |  | B
10.4* |  | 2014 Variable Compensation (Executive Bonus) and Base Programs dated November 12, 2013 |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 23, 2014 |  | 10.10
10.5* |  | Death Benefit and Retirement Benefit Agreement between the Company and Victor Dellovo dated September 13, 2013 |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 24, 2013 |  | 10.11
10.6* |  | Form of Change of Control Agreement with Gary W. Levine dated January 11, 2008 |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 23, 2010 |  | 10.11
10.7* |  | 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan |  |  |  | DEF 14A |  | January 6, 2014 |  | A
10.8* |  | 2015 Stock Incentive Plan |  |  |  | DEF 14RA |  | January 25, 2019 |  | A
10.9 |  | 2015 Lowell, MA Lease |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 24, 2015 |  | 10.21
10.10 |  | 2015 Deerfield Beach, FL Lease |  |  |  | 10‑K |  | December 24, 2015 |  | 10.20
10.11* |  | Executive Retention and Service Agreement with Victor Dellovo, dated September 4, 2012 |  |  |  | 10‑Q |  | February 14, 2018 |  | 10.1
10.12* |  | Forms of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement |  |  |  | 10‑Q |  | February 14, 2018 |  | 10.2
10.13 |  | Share Purchase and Assignment Agreement |  |  |  | 8‑K |  | June 27, 2018 |  | 2.1
21.1 |  | Subsidiaries |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
23.1 |  | Consent of RSM LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
101.INS |  | XBRL Instance |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
101.SCH |  | XBRL Taxonomy Schema |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
101.CAL |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
101.DEF |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

35

Table of Contents

101.LAB |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
101.PRE |  | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

*Management contract or compensatory plan.

Item 16. Form 10‑K Summary

None.

36

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| CSP INC.
| By: | /s/ Victor Dellovo
|  | Victor Dellovo Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: December 10, 2019

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name |  | Title |  | Date
/s/ Victor Dellovo |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |  | December 10, 2019
Victor Dellovo |  |  |
/s/ Gary W. Levine |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |  | December 10, 2019
Gary W. Levine |  |  |
/s/ Mike Newbanks |  | Vice President of Finance (Chief Accounting Officer) |  | December 10, 2019
Mike Newbanks |  |  |
/s/ C. Shelton James |  | Director |  | December 10, 2019
C. Shelton James |  |  |  |
/s/ Raymond Charles Blackmon |  | Director |  | December 10, 2019
Raymond Charles Blackmon |  |  |  |
/s/ Marilyn T. Smith |  | Director |  | December 10, 2019
Marilyn T. Smith |  |  |  |
/s/ Izzy Azeri |  | Director |  | December 10, 2019
Izzy Azeri |  |  |  |

37

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of CSP Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CSP Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ RSM US LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

Boston, Massachusetts

December 10, 2019

38

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except par value)

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
ASSETS |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | $ | 18,099 |  | $ | 25,107
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $138 and $87 |  |  | 15,114 |  |  | 11,980
Unbilled accounts receivable |  |  | — |  |  | 1,166
Investment in lease, net-current portion |  |  | 367 |  |  | 246
Inventories |  |  | 7,818 |  |  | 7,558
Refundable income taxes |  |  | 487 |  |  | 480
Other current assets |  |  | 4,649 |  |  | 1,878
Total current assets |  |  | 46,534 |  |  | 48,415
Property, equipment and improvements, net |  |  | 1,273 |  |  | 847
Other assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Intangibles, net |  |  | 37 |  |  | 48
Investment in lease, net-less current portion |  |  | 417 |  |  | 564
Long term receivable |  |  | 5,328 |  |  | —
Deferred income taxes |  |  | 1,946 |  |  | 1,895
Cash surrender value of life insurance |  |  | 3,718 |  |  | 3,441
Other assets |  |  | 116 |  |  | 65
Total other assets |  |  | 11,562 |  |  | 6,013
Total assets |  | $ | 59,369 |  | $ | 55,275
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |  | $ | 16,175 |  | $ | 9,277
Line of credit |  |  | 2,459 |  |  | 3,247
Note payable - current portion |  |  | 317 |  |  | —
Deferred revenue |  |  | 741 |  |  | 1,197
Pension and retirement plans |  |  | 335 |  |  | 340
Total current liabilities |  |  | 20,027 |  |  | 14,061
Pension and retirement plans |  |  | 6,904 |  |  | 6,168
Note payable - noncurrent portion |  |  | 684 |  |  | —
Income taxes payable |  |  | 694 |  |  | 709
Other noncurrent liabilities |  |  | 632 |  |  | 535
Total liabilities |  |  | 28,941 |  |  | 21,473
Commitments and contingencies |  |  |  |  |  |
Shareholders’ equity: |  |  |  |  |  |
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; authorized, 7,500 shares; issued and outstanding 4,154 and 4,017 shares, respectively |  |  | 42 |  |  | 40
Additional paid-in capital |  |  | 15,733 |  |  | 14,661
Retained earnings |  |  | 27,246 |  |  | 29,926
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |  |  | (12,593) |  |  | (10,825)
Total shareholders’ equity |  |  | 30,428 |  |  | 33,802
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |  | $ | 59,369 |  | $ | 55,275

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

39

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands, except for per share data)

|  |  | For the year ended
|  |  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  |  | 2019 |  | 2018
Sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  |  | $ | 66,017 |  | $ | 59,661
Services |  |  |  | 13,044 |  |  | 13,255
Total sales |  |  |  | 79,061 |  |  | 72,916
Cost of sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  |  |  | 55,836 |  |  | 50,000
Services |  |  |  | 5,199 |  |  | 4,517
Total cost of sales |  |  |  | 61,035 |  |  | 54,517
Gross profit |  |  |  | 18,026 |  |  | 18,399
Operating expenses: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Engineering and development |  |  |  | 2,800 |  |  | 3,277
Selling, general and administrative |  |  |  | 16,052 |  |  | 16,723
Total operating expenses |  |  |  | 18,852 |  |  | 20,000
Operating loss |  |  |  | (826) |  |  | (1,601)
Other income (expense): |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Foreign exchange gain |  |  |  | 157 |  |  | 263
Other income, net |  |  |  | 227 |  |  | 232
Total other income |  |  |  | 384 |  |  | 495
Loss before income taxes |  |  |  | (442) |  |  | (1,106)
Income tax (benefit) expense |  |  |  | (71) |  |  | 882
Net loss from continuing operations |  |  |  | (371) |  |  | (1,988)
Discontinued operations: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Gain from sale of discontinued operations |  |  |  | — |  |  | 16,838
Loss from discontinued operations |  |  |  | — |  |  | (410)
Net income from discontinued operations |  |  |  | — |  |  | 16,428
Net (loss) income |  |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | 14,440
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |  |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | 13,842
Net loss from continuing operations per share – basic |  |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.52)
Gain per share from sale of discontinued operations - basic |  |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.41
Net loss from discontinued operations per share – basic |  |  |  | — |  |  | (0.11)
Total income per share of discontinued operations - basic |  |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.30
Net (loss) income per share – basic |  |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | 3.62
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic |  |  |  | 3,924 |  |  | 3,822
Net loss from continuing operations per share – diluted |  |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.52)
Gain per share from sale of discontinued operations - diluted |  |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.32
Net loss from discontinued operations per share – diluted |  |  |  | — |  |  | (0.11)
Total income per share of discontinued operations - diluted |  |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.21
Net (loss) income per share – diluted |  |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | 3.55
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted |  |  |  | 3,924 |  |  | 3,901

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

40

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in thousands)

|  | For the Year Ended
|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | 14,440
Other comprehensive income (loss): |  |  |  |  |  |
Unrealized actuarial (loss) gain on minimum pension liability, net of tax effect |  |  | (1,003) |  |  | 470
Foreign currency translation loss adjustments |  |  | (765) |  |  | (1,132)
Other comprehensive loss |  |  | (1,768) |  |  | (662)
Total comprehensive (loss) income |  | $ | (2,139) |  | $ | 13,778

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

41

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Year Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:

(Amounts in thousands)

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  |  | other |  | Total
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | comprehensive |  | Shareholders’
For the year ended September 30, 2018: |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | loss |  | Equity
Balance as of September 30, 2017 |  | 3,935 |  | $ | 40 |  | $ | 13,717 |  | $ | 17,407 |  | $ | (10,163) |  | $ | 21,001
Comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 14,440 |  |  | — |  |  | 14,440
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (662) |  |  | (662)
Exercise of stock options |  | 5 |  |  | — |  |  | 22 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 22
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 691 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 691
Restricted stock cancellation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Restricted stock issuance |  | 54 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan |  | 23 |  |  | — |  |  | 231 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 231
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.48 per share) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,921) |  |  | — |  |  | (1,921)
Balance as of September 30, 2018 |  | 4,017 |  | $ | 40 |  | $ | 14,661 |  | $ | 29,926 |  | $ | (10,825) |  | $ | 33,802
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Additional |  |  |  |  | other |  | Total
|  |  |  |  |  |  | Paid-in |  | Retained |  | comprehensive |  | Shareholders’
For the year ended September 30, 2019: |  | Shares |  | Amount |  | Capital |  | Earnings |  | loss |  | Equity
Balance as of September 30, 2018 |  | 4,017 |  | $ | 40 |  | $ | 14,661 |  | $ | 29,926 |  | $ | (10,825) |  | $ | 33,802
Comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Adoption of ASU 2014-09 (see note 1) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 158 |  |  | — |  |  | 158
Net loss |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (371) |  |  | — |  |  | (371)
Other comprehensive loss |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (1,768) |  |  | (1,768)
Exercise of stock options |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | 3 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 3
Stock-based compensation |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 792 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 792
Restricted stock cancellation |  | (3) |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Restricted stock issuance |  | 108 |  |  | 1 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 1
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan |  | 31 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 277 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 278
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.60 per share) |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | (2,467) |  |  | — |  |  | (2,467)
Balance as of September 30, 2019 |  | 4,154 |  | $ | 42 |  | $ | 15,733 |  | $ | 27,246 |  | $ | (12,593) |  | $ | 30,428

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

42

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

|  | For the year ended
|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
Cash flows used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net loss from continuing operations |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | (1,988)
Net income from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 16,428
Net (loss) income |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | 14,440
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation |  |  | 405 |  |  | 506
Amortization of intangibles |  |  | 11 |  |  | 119
Loss on disposal of property, equipment and improvements |  |  | — |  |  | 4
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | (16,838)
Foreign exchange gain |  |  | (157) |  |  | (263)
Non-cash changes in accounts receivable |  |  | 53 |  |  | (38)
Non-cash changes in inventories |  |  | 503 |  |  | 555
Stock-based compensation expense on stock options and restricted stock awards |  |  | 792 |  |  | 691
Deferred income taxes |  |  | (209) |  |  | 173
(Increase) decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance |  |  | (134) |  |  | 9
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |  |  | (2,128) |  |  | 5,191
Decrease (increase) in life insurance receivable |  |  | 256 |  |  | (256)
Increase in inventories |  |  | (777) |  |  | (2,562)
Decrease (increase) in refundable income taxes |  |  | 585 |  |  | (654)
Increase in other assets and deferred costs |  |  | (3,091) |  |  | (522)
Decrease (increase) in investment in lease |  |  | 26 |  |  | (810)
Increase in long term receivable |  |  | (5,328) |  |  | —
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |  |  | 7,232 |  |  | (2,538)
Increase in deferred revenue |  |  | (244) |  |  | 262
Decrease in pension and retirement plans liabilities |  |  | (353) |  |  | (120)
(Decrease) increase in income taxes payable |  |  | (500) |  |  | 464
(Decrease) increase in other long term liabilities |  |  | 100 |  |  | 576
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations |  |  | (3,329) |  |  | (1,611)
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 4,491
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |  |  | (3,329) |  |  | 2,880
Cash flows used in investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Life insurance premiums paid |  |  | (144) |  |  | (150)
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 14,387
Purchases of property, equipment and improvements |  |  | (832) |  |  | (438)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations |  |  | (976) |  |  | 13,799
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | (154)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |  | (976) |  |  | 13,645
Cash flows used in financing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Dividends paid |  |  | (2,467) |  |  | (1,921)
Net borrowings under line-of-credit agreement |  |  | (788) |  |  | 137
Proceeds from debt |  |  | 1,001 |  |  | —
Principal payments on capital leases |  |  | (276) |  |  | (70)
Proceeds from issuance of shares under equity compensation plans |  |  | 280 |  |  | 253
Net cash used in financing activities |  |  | (2,250) |  |  | (1,601)
Effects of exchange rate on cash |  |  | (453) |  |  | (238)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (7,008) |  |  | 14,686
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |  |  | 25,107 |  |  | 10,421
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |  | $ | 18,099 |  | $ | 25,107
Supplementary cash flow information: |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash paid for income taxes |  | $ | 52 |  | $ | 900
Cash paid for interest |  | $ | 68 |  | $ | 73
Supplementary non-cash financing and investing activities: |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-cash purchases of property and equipment |  | $ | 141 |  | $ | 865

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

43

Table of Contents

CSP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018

Organization and Business

CSP Inc. ("CSPi" or "CSPI" or "the Company" or "we" or "our") was founded in 1968 and is based in Lowell, Massachusetts. To meet the diverse requirements of commercial and defense customers worldwide, CSPI and its subsidiaries develop and market IT integration solutions, advanced security products, managed IT services, purpose built network adapters, and high-performance cluster computer systems. The Company operates in two segments, its High Performance Products ("HPP") segment and its Technology Solutions ("TS") segment.

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

Foreign Currency Translation

The U.S. Dollar is the reporting currency for all periods presented. The financial information for entities outside the United States is measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation adjustment is reflected as accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets. Currency transaction gains and losses are recorded as other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition are considered cash equivalents.

Research and Development Expense

For the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, our expenses for research and development were approximately $2.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Expenditures for research and development are expensed as they are incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, including intangible assets subject to amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Management assesses the recoverability of the long-lived assets (other than goodwill) by comparing the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets against their respective carrying amounts. The amount of impairment, if any, is calculated based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Intangible assets that are not subject to amortization are also required to be tested annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. We did not have intangible assets with indefinite lives at any time during the two years ended September 30, 2019. Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, generally three to ten years, and are carried at net book value. The remaining useful lives of intangible assets are evaluated on an annual basis. Intangible assets subject to amortization are

44

Table of Contents

also tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the fair value of an intangible asset subject to amortization is determined to be less than its carrying value, then an impairment charge is recorded to write down that asset to its fair value.

Investment in lease, net

A lease receivable for equipment is recorded at lease inception, which includes future minimum lease payments at present value using the implicit interest rate, net of unearned interest income. Interest income is recognized on a monthly basis utilizing the effective-interest method. Interest income is recorded in revenue as equipment leasing is part of the Company’s central operations.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out method. The recoverability of inventories is based upon the types and levels of inventories held, forecasted demand, pricing, competition and changes in technology. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. As of September 30, 2019, and September 30, 2018, the Company maintained inventory reserves of $3.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

Property, Equipment and Improvements

The components of property, equipment and improvements are stated at cost. The Company provides for depreciation by use of the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (three to seven years). Leasehold improvements are amortized by use of the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Property, equipment and improvements are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the fair value of property, equipment and improvements is determined to be less than their carrying value, then an impairment charge is recorded to write down that asset to its fair value.

Trade Accounts Receivable, Long Term Receivable, and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are stated at amounts that have been billed to customers less an allowance for doubtful accounts. Allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded for the estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The estimates for the allowance for doubtful accounts are based on the length of time the receivables are past due, current business environment, and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Accounts receivable are charged off against the reserve when management has determined they are uncollectible. Within trade accounts receivable and long-term receivable are financing agreements with an original payment term of greater than one year. Interest income earned on these receivables is recognized using the effective interest method. See Note 3 Accounts and Long Term Receivables.

Pension and Retirement Plans

The funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans is recognized on the consolidated balance sheet. Gains and losses, prior service costs and credits and any remaining transition amounts that have not yet been recognized through pension expense will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic pension/postretirement benefits expense. Additionally, plan assets and obligations are measured as of our fiscal year-end balance sheet date (September 30).

We have defined benefit and defined contribution plans in the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) and in the U.S. In the U.K. the Company provides defined benefit pension plans for certain employees and former employees and defined contribution plans for the majority of the employees. The defined benefit plan in the U.K. is closed to newly hired

45

Table of Contents

employees and has been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. In the U.S., the Company also provides defined contribution plans that cover most employees and supplementary retirement plans to certain employees and former employees who are now retired. These supplementary retirement plans are also closed to newly hired employees and have been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. These supplementary plans are funded through whole life insurance policies. The Company expects to recover all insurance premiums paid under these policies in the future, through the cash surrender value of the policies and any death benefits or portions thereof to be paid upon the death of the participant. These whole life insurance policies are carried on the balance sheet at their cash surrender values as they are owned by the Company and not assets of the defined benefit plans. In the U.S., the Company also provides for officer death benefits and post-retirement health insurance benefits through supplemental post-retirement plans to certain officers. The Company also funds these supplemental plans’ obligations through whole life insurance policies on the officers.

Pension expense is based on an actuarial computation of current future benefits using estimates for expected return on assets, expected compensation increases and applicable discount rates. Management has reviewed the discount rates and rates of return with our consulting actuaries and investment advisor and concluded they were reasonable. A decrease in the expected return on pension assets would increase pension expense. Expected compensation increases are estimated based on historical and expected increases in the future. Increases in estimated compensation increases would result in higher pension expense while decreases would lower pension expense. Discount rates are selected based upon rates of return on high quality fixed income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefit. A decrease in the discount rate would result in greater pension expense while an increase in the discount rate would decrease pension expense.

The Company funds its pension plans in amounts sufficient to meet the requirements set forth in applicable employee benefits laws and local tax laws. Liabilities for amounts in excess of these funding levels are accrued and reported in the consolidated balance sheets.

Segment Information

We have two operating segments; (i) High Performance Products ("HPP") and (ii) Technology Solutions ("TS"). In the HPP segment, we design, manufacture and deliver products and services to customers that require specialized cyber security services, networking and signal processing products. In the TS segment, we focus on value added reseller ("VAR") integrated solutions including third party hardware, software and technical computer-related consulting and managed services. The operations and assets of our HPP segment are located in the United States. The operations and assets of our TS segment are located in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Revenue Recognition

Effective October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. See below for effects of initial adoption. The following reflects the accounting policy change for revenue starting on the date of adoption:

We derive revenue from the sale of integrated hardware and software, third-party service contracts, professional services, managed services, financing of hardware and software, and other services.

We recognize revenue from hardware upon transfer of control, which is at a point in time typically upon shipment when title transfers. Revenue from software is recognized at a point in time when the license is granted.

We recognize revenue from third-party service contracts as either gross sales or net sales depending on whether the Company is acting as a principal party to the transaction or simply acting as an agent or broker based on control and timing. The Company is a principal if it controls the good or service before that good or service is transferred to the customer. We record revenue as gross when the Company is a principal party to the arrangement and net of cost when we are acting as a broker or agent. Under gross sales recognition, the entire selling price is recorded in revenue and our cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded in cost of goods sold. Under net sales recognition, the cost

46

Table of Contents

to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded as a reduction to revenue resulting in net sales equal to the gross profit on the transaction. Third-party service contracts are sold in different combinations with hardware, software, and services. We have determined the third-party services contracts are a single performance obligation in each sale. When the Company is an agent, revenue is typically recorded at a point in time. When the Company is the principal, revenue is recognized over the contract term.

Professional services generally include implementation, installation, and training services. Professional services are considered a series of distinct services that form one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as services are performed.

Revenue generated from managed services is recognized over the term of the contract. Certain managed services contracts include financing of hardware and software. Revenues from arrangements which include financing are allocated considering relative standalone selling prices of lease and non-lease components within the agreement. The lease components include the hardware and software, which are subject to ASC 840. The non-lease component includes the managed services and is subject to ASC 606.

Other services generally include revenue generated through our royalty, extended warranty, multicomputer repair, and maintenance contracts. Royalty revenue is sales-based and recognized on date of subsequent sale of the product, which occurs on the date of customer shipment. Revenue from extended warranty contracts is recognized evenly over the period of the warranty. Multicomputer repair services revenue is recognized upon control transfer when the customer takes possession of the computer at time of shipping. Revenue generated from maintenance services is recognized evenly over the term of the contract.

Variable consideration is immaterial. The right of return risk lies with the original manufacturer of the product. Managed service contracts contain the right to refund if canceled within 30 days of inception. Any products with a standard warranty are treated as a warranty obligation under ASC 460, Guarantees.

The following policies are applicable to our major categories of segment revenue transactions:

TS Segment Revenue

TS Segment revenue is derived from the sale of hardware, software, professional services, third-party service contracts, maintenance contracts, managed services, and financing of hardware and software. Financing revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 840, Leases. Financing revenue is recorded in revenue as equipment leasing and is part of the Company’s operations.

Third-party service contracts are evaluated to determine whether such service revenue should be recorded as gross or net sales and whether over time or at point in time.

HPP Segment Revenue

HPP segment revenue is derived from the sale of integrated hardware and software, maintenance, and other services through the Multicomputer and Myricom product lines.

Myricom revenue is derived from the sale of products, which are comprised of both hardware and embedded software which is essential to the products functionality, and post contract maintenance and support. Post contract maintenance and support is considered immaterial in the context of the contract and therefore is not a separate performance obligation.

47

Table of Contents

See disaggregated revenues below by products/services and geography.

|  |  |  | Technology Solutions Segment |  |
|  | High |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Performance |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Products |  | United |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Consolidated
For the year ended September 30, |  | Segment |  | Kingdom |  | U.S. |  | Total |  | Total
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  | $ | 6,406 |  | $ | 4,936 |  | $ | 54,540 |  | $ | 59,476 |  | $ | 65,882
Service |  |  | 1,496 |  |  | 380 |  |  | 11,168 |  |  | 11,548 |  |  | 13,044
Finance * |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 135 |  |  | 135 |  |  | 135
Total sales |  | $ | 7,902 |  | $ | 5,316 |  | $ | 65,843 |  | $ | 71,159 |  | $ | 79,061

* Finance revenue is related to equipment leasing and is not subject to the guidance on revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606).

Significant Judgments

The input method using labor hours expended relative to the total expected hours is used to recognize revenue for professional services. Only the hours that depict the Company’s performance toward satisfying a performance obligation are used for progress. An estimate for professional services is made at the beginning of each contract based on prior experience and monitored throughout the services. This method is most appropriate as it depicts the measure of progress towards satisfaction of the performance obligation.

When product and services are sold together, the allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation is calculated using a budgeted cost-plus margin approach. Due to the complex nature of these contracts, there is significant judgment in allocating the transaction price. These estimates are periodically reviewed by project managers, engineers, and other staff involved to ensure estimates are appropriate. For items sold separately, including hardware, software, professional services, maintenance contracts, other services, and third-party service contracts, there is no allocation performed as there is one performance obligation.

Contract Assets and Liabilities

When the Company has performed work but does not have an unconditional right to payment, a contract asset is recorded. When the Company has the right to bill a customer, accounts receivable is recorded as an unconditional right exists. Current contract assets were $0.6 million and $1.1 million as of September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, respectively. The current portion is recorded in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. There were no non-current contract assets as of September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018. The difference in the balances is due to regular timing differences between when work is performed and having an unconditional right to payment.

Contract liabilities arise when payment is received before the Company transfers a good or service to the customer. Current contract liabilities were $0.7 million and $0.9 million as of September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, respectively. The current portion of contract liabilities is recorded in deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets. The long-term portion of contract liabilities were $0.3 million as of September 30, 2019. There were none at October 1, 2018. These non-current liabilities are recorded in other noncurrent liabilities. Revenue recognized for the year ended September 30, 2019 that was included in contract liabilities as of the beginning of the period was $0.8 million.

Contract Costs

Incremental costs of obtaining a contract involving customer transactions where the revenue and the related transfer of goods and services are less than a one-year period, are expensed as incurred, utilizing the practical expedient in ASC 340‑40‑25‑4. For a period greater than one year, incremental contract costs are capitalized if the Company

48

Table of Contents

expects to recover these costs. These costs are only capitalized if the contract is obtained. The costs are amortized over the contract term and expected renewal periods. The period of amortization is generally three to six years. Incremental costs are related to commissions in the TS portion of the business. Current capitalized contract costs are within the account other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets for the periods ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018. The portion of current capitalized costs was $85 thousand and $71 thousand as of September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, respectively. There are no non-current capitalized costs on the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of incremental costs amortized for the year ended September 30, 2019 was $235 thousand, which is recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses. There was no impairment related to incremental costs capitalized during the year ended September 30, 2019.

Costs to fulfill a contract are capitalized when the costs are related to a contract or anticipated contract, generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying performance obligations in the future, and costs are recoverable. Costs to fulfill a contract are related to the TS portion of the business and involve activities performed before managed services can be completed. Current capitalized fulfillment costs are in the account other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of current capitalized costs was $47 thousand and $60 thousand as of September 30, 2019 and October 1, 2018, respectively. There are no non-current capitalized fulfillment costs on the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of fulfillment costs amortized for year ended September 30, 2019 was $13 thousand, which is recorded in cost of sales. There was no impairment related to fulfillment costs capitalized.

Other

Projects are typically billed upon completion or at certain milestones. Product and services are typically billed when shipped or as services are being performed. Payment terms are typically 30 days to pay in full except in Europe where it could be up to 90 days. Most of the Company’s contracts are less than one year. As a practical expedient, the Company has elected not to adjust the amount of consideration for effects of a significant financing component when it is anticipated the promised good or service will be transferred and the subsequent payment will be one year or less. There are certain contracts that do contain a financing component. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company elected to use the optional exemption to not disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that have an original expected duration of one year or less. This is due to a low amount of performance obligations less than one year being unsatisfied at each period end. Most of these contracts are related to product sales.

The Company has certain contracts that have an original term of more than one year. The royalty agreement is longer than one year and managed service contracts are generally longer than one year. For these contracts the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied as of September 30, 2019 is mainly related to managed service contracts and is set forth in the table below:

|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Fiscal 2020 |  | $ | 2,019
Fiscal 2021 |  |  | 1,033
Fiscal 2022 |  |  | 300
Fiscal 2023 |  |  | 60
|  | $ | 3,412

Product Warranty Accrual

Our product sales generally include a hardware warranty which ranges from 90‑days to three-years. At time of product shipment, we accrue for the estimated cost to repair or replace potentially defective products. Estimated warranty costs are based upon prior actual warranty costs for substantially similar products.

49

Table of Contents

Engineering and Development Expenses

Engineering and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, stock-based compensation and other headcount-related expenses associated with product development. Engineering and development expenses also include third-party development and programming costs. We consider technological feasibility for our software products to be reached upon the release of the software, accordingly, no internal software development costs have been capitalized.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We also reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. This methodology requires estimates and judgments in the determination of the recoverability of deferred tax assets and in the calculation of certain tax liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded against the gross deferred tax assets that management believes, after considering all available positive and negative objective evidence, historical and prospective, with greater weight given to historical evidence, that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized.

In addition, we are required to recognize in the consolidated financial statements, those tax positions determined to be more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the positions as of the reporting date. If a tax position is not considered more-likely-than-not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits, no benefits of the position are recognized.

In addition, the calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. The Company records liabilities for estimated tax obligations in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions. These estimated tax liabilities include the provision for taxes that may become payable in the future.

Earnings per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the maximum dilution that would have resulted from the assumed exercise and share repurchase related to dilutive stock options and is computed by dividing net income by the assumed weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

We are required to present earnings per share ("EPS") utilizing the two class method because we had outstanding, non-vested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, which are considered participating securities.

50

Table of Contents

Basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the Company’s reported net income attributable to common stockholders are as follows:

|  | For the years ended
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands except per share data)
Loss from continuing operations |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | (1,988)
Gain from sale of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 16,838
Loss from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | (410)
Total income from discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 16,428
Net (loss) income |  |  | (371) |  |  | 14,440
Less: net income attributable to nonvested common stock |  |  | — |  |  | 598
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | 13,842
Weighted average total shares outstanding – basic |  |  | 3,924 |  |  | 3,987
Less: weighted average non–vested shares outstanding |  |  | — |  |  | 165
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic |  |  | 3,924 |  |  | 3,822
Potential common shares from non–vested stock awards and the assumed exercise of stock options |  |  | — |  |  | 79
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted |  |  | 3,924 |  |  | 3,901
Net loss from continuing operations per share – basic |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.52)
Net income from discontinued operations per share – basic |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.30
Net (loss) income share – basic |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | 3.62
Net (loss) from continuing operations per share – diluted |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.52)
Net income from discontinued operations per share – diluted |  | $ | — |  | $ | 4.21
Net (loss) income per share – diluted |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | 3.55

All anti-dilutive securities, including stock options, are excluded from the diluted income per share computation. Non-vested restricted stock awards of 165,000 shares were excluded from net income per share for the year ended September 30, 2018, and their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including stock options and nonvested shares of restricted common stock based on estimated fair values of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock option grants. The fair value of nonvested restricted share awards is equal to the quoted market price of our common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant. The fair value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Because stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for

51

Table of Contents

estimated forfeitures and will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 consisted of options and restricted stock granted pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive and employee stock purchase plans of approximately $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions in the U.S. and the U.K. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Subsequent Events

The Company recognizes in the consolidated financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the statement of financial position, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing.

Accounting standards recently adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The standard outlines a five-step model whereby revenue is recognized as performance obligations within a contract are satisfied. The standard also requires new, expanded disclosures regarding revenue recognition. The ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach only to contracts that were not completed as of adoption date. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initial application as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. This resulted in an increase of $158 thousand to retained earnings as of October 1, 2018. This was primarily due to revenue related to customer support in the HPP segment no longer being deferred, which resulted in a decrease of deferred revenue as part of the cumulative effect. Additionally, revenue from software sales is no longer being deferred under ASC 606 as recognition is now when control transfers to the customer. There were no previous period financial statement adjustments.

52

Table of Contents

The effects of ASC 606 adoption for the Company for the condensed consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet are as follows:

|  | Year ended September 30, 2019
|  | (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|  |  |  |  | Balances |  | Effect of
|  |  |  |  | without |  | change
|  | As |  | adoption of |  | Higher/
|  | Reported |  | ASC 606 |  | (Lower)
Total sales |  | $ | 79,061 |  | $ | 78,563 |  | $ | 498
Total cost of sales |  |  | 61,035 |  |  | 60,567 |  |  | 468
Gross profit |  |  | 18,026 |  |  | 17,996 |  |  | 30
Operating loss |  |  | (826) |  |  | (856) |  |  | 30
Income tax benefit |  |  | (71) |  |  | (76) |  |  | 5
Net loss |  |  | (371) |  |  | (396) |  |  | 25
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |  | $ | (371) |  | $ | (396) |  | $ | 25
Basic earnings per share |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.10) |  | $ | 0.01
Diluted earnings per share |  | $ | (0.09) |  | $ | (0.10) |  | $ | 0.01

|  | As of September 30, 2019
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
|  |  |  |  | Balances |  | Effect of
|  |  |  |  | without |  | change
|  | As |  | adoption of |  | Higher/
|  | Reported |  | ASC 606 |  | (Lower)
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable |  | $ | 15,114 |  | $ | 14,929 |  | $ | 185
Unbilled accounts receivable |  |  | — |  |  | 565 |  |  | (565)
Inventories |  |  | 7,818 |  |  | 8,484 |  |  | (666)
Other current assets |  |  | 4,649 |  |  | 4,069 |  |  | 580
Deferred tax asset |  |  | 1,946 |  |  | 2,000 |  |  | (54)
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Deferred revenue |  | $ | 741 |  | $ | 1,444 |  | $ | (703)
Shareholders' Equity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Retained Earnings |  | $ | 27,246 |  | $ | 27,063 |  | $ | 183

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10), which included updates to the recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities. It also modified the disclosure requirements, which are reflected in Note 19. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This ASU will reduce diversity in practice for classifying cash payments and receipts in the statement of cash flows for a number of common transactions. It will also clarify when identifiable cash flows should be separated versus classified based on their predominant source or use. This ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This ASU requires the seller and buyer to recognize at the transaction date the current and deferred income tax consequences of intercompany asset transfers (except transfers of

53

Table of Contents

inventory). Under current GAAP, the seller and buyer defer the consolidated tax consequences of an intercompany asset transfer from the period of the transfer to a future period when the asset is transferred out of the consolidated group, or otherwise affects consolidated earnings. This standard will cause volatility in companies’ effective tax rates, particularly for those that transfer intangible assets to foreign subsidiaries. For public entities, the new standard is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity may early adopt the standard but only at the beginning of an annual period for which it has not issued or made available for issuance financial statements (interim or annual). The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805) (“ASU No. 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides a framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. ASU 2017-01 provides more consistency in applying the business combination guidance, reduces the costs of application, and makes the definition of a business more operable. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim and annual periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This ASU requires employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other post-retirement benefit plans to report the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. Employers are required to present the other components of net benefit costs in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost will be eligible for asset capitalization. For public entities, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that annual period. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective October 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

New accounting standards not adopted as of September 30, 2019

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑02, Leases (Topic 842), an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This ASU requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for most lease arrangements. The new standard is effective for the Company on October 1, 2019. The standard mandates a modified retrospective transition method for all entities and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt the new lease guidance using the modified retrospective approach at the period of adoption (October 1, 2019) with no adjustment to prior period disclosures. A package of three practical expedients that is applicable to all leases as lessee or lessor will be adopted. This includes not reassessing whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, not reassessing lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and not reassessing initial direct cost for any existing lease under ASC Topic 840. The Company also elected the practical expedient as a lessee to not separate non-lease components. A material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet is anticipated due to the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases, which are currently not recorded. There is no material effect anticipated in the statement of operations. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016‑02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016‑13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This ASU will change how entities account for credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities entities will be required to estimate lifetime expected credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities entities will be required to recognize an allowance for credit losses rather than a reduction to the carrying value of the asset. Additionally, there will be a significant increase in the amount of disclosures by year of origination for certain financing receivables. For public entities, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that annual period. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016‑13 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

54

Table of Contents

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate on the gross deferred tax amounts at the date of enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2018‑02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Under this ASU companies will no longer be required to value non-employee awards differently from employee awards, but the accounting remains different for attribution and a contractual term election for valuing nonemployee equity share options. Equity-classified awards to nonemployees will now be measured at the grant date using fair value of the equity instruments the company is obligated to issue and recognition is associated with the probable outcome. Awards are subsequently measured using stock compensation guidance unless they are modified after the nonemployee stops providing goods or services. Existing disclosure requirements within the stock compensation guidance also apply to nonemployee awards. For public entities, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2018‑07 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715‑20), Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Under this ASU existing disclosures not considered cost beneficial are removed, disclosures identified as relevant are added, and there is added clarification regarding specific existing disclosures. For public entities, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2018‑14 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

2. Discontinued Operations of TS segment

On July 31, 2018, CSPi LTD, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, completed its sale of all of the outstanding stock of Modcomp GmbH, to Reply AG, an affiliate of Reply SpA, a holding company for a worldwide group of companies, pursuant to the terms of a Share Purchase and Assignment Agreement dated June 27, 2018. Modcomp GmbH, dba CSPI GmbH, through itself and its wholly owned subsidiaries, provided managed security services to customers primarily in Germany.

Upon the closing of the Share Purchase Agreement, Reply AG paid to CSPI total cash at closing of approximately $14.4 million, which consisted of the original purchase price of $11.7 million plus an adjustment at closing for Net Cash (as defined in the Share Purchase Agreement) of approximately $2.7 million. An additional €400 thousand is included in escrow and will be recorded if and when received by the Company. Accordingly, CSPi determined that the assets and liabilities of this reportable segment met the discontinued operations criteria in U.S. GAAP in the year ended September 30, 2018. The gain recorded due to the sale of all the stock of Modcomp GmbH was approximately $16.8 million. No income taxes were provided as the transaction was a tax-free exchange in the U.K. As such, Modcomp GmbH’s results have been recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.

55

Table of Contents

Summarized Discontinued Operations Financial Information

As the sale of the subsidiary occurred prior to September 30, 2018 there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

The following table summarizes the results of discontinued operations for the years ended September 30, 2019, and 2018.

|  | For the year ended |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |
Sales |  | $ | — |  | $ | 18,365 |
Cost of sales |  |  | — |  |  | 15,843 |
Gross profit |  |  | — |  |  | 2,522 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |  | — |  |  | 2,837 |
Operating loss |  |  | — |  |  | (315) |
Other expenses |  |  | — |  |  | (95) |
Loss before income taxes |  |  | — |  |  | (410) |
Income tax expense |  |  | — |  |  | — |
Loss from discontinued operations |  | $ | — |  | $ | (410) |
Gain from sale of discontinued operations |  |  | — |  |  | 16,838 |
Total income from discontinued operations |  | $ | — |  | $ | 16,428 |

3. Accounts and Long Term Receivable

Within accounts receivable and long term receivable there are amounts due reflecting sales whose payment terms exceed one year. This financing is separate from agreements with a leasing component, see Note 4 for financing through leases. These receivables are included in Accounts Receivable and Long Term Receivable in the amount of $2.1 million and $5.0 million as of September 30, 2019. The long-term receivable carries a weighted interest rate of 6.9%, which reflects the approximate interest rate consistent with a separate financing transaction with the customer. The Company did not finance any sales of hardware, software, or services in fiscal year 2018, except for agreements containing a lease which is described in Note 4.

There is not an allowance for credit losses nor impairments for accounts and long term receivables with a contractual maturity of over one year. There was also no activity in the allowance for credit losses of these receivables for the year ended September 30, 2019. All these agreements are looked at as one portfolio in determining credit losses. There are various factors that are considered in extending a customer payment terms longer than one year including payment history, economic conditions, and capacity to pay. The credit quality of customers is monitored by payment activity. The unearned income represents a rate similar to market.

Contractual maturities of outstanding financing with an original contractual maturity over one year are as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 2,502
2021 |  |  | 2,258
2022 |  |  | 1,880
2023 |  |  | 1,423
Total payments |  |  | 8,063
Less: unearned income |  |  | 976
Total, net of unearned income |  | $ | 7,087

56

Table of Contents

The current portion of $2.1 million is within accounts receivable. Total long term receivable was $5.3 million at September 30, 2019, which included $5.0 million from financing and $0.3 million that did not have a financing component. The $0.3 million was recorded as the contract it relates to is noncancelable.

4. Investment in Lease

Investment in Lease, net

The Company enters into certain agreements where it supplies equipment to be used in a customer’s IT infrastructure in conjunction with the Company providing managed services. Agreements contain a lease because the customer has a right to use the equipment for a stated period of time. The leases are either a direct-financing or sales-type. At lease inception a lease receivable is recorded, which includes future minimum lease payments at present value using the implicit interest rate. Interest income is recognized on a monthly basis utilizing the effective-interest method. Interest income from leases is recorded in revenue as equipment leasing is part of the Company’s central operations.

A summary of components for the Company’s investment in lease, net is as follows:

| September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
| (Amounts in thousands)
Investment in lease, gross | $ | 889 |  | $ | 1,038
Unearned income |  | (105) |  |  | (228)
Total investment in lease, net | $ | 784 |  | $ | 810
Current portion | $ | 367 |  | $ | 246
Noncurrent portion | $ | 417 |  | $ | 564

The schedule of future minimum lease payments receivable is as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 451
2021 |  |  | 356
2022 |  |  | 67
2023 |  |  | 12
2024 |  |  | 3
Minimum lease payments including interest |  | $ | 889
Amount representing interest |  |  | (105)
Minimum lease payments excluding interest |  | $ | 784

5. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Raw materials |  | $ | 671 |  | $ | 1,098
Work-in-process |  |  | 93 |  |  | 226
Finished goods |  |  | 7,054 |  |  | 6,234
Total |  | $ | 7,818 |  | $ | 7,558

57

Table of Contents

6. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

|  | Effect of |  |  |  |  | Accumulated
|  | Foreign |  | Minimum |  | Other
|  | Currency |  | Pension |  | Comprehensive
|  | Translation |  | Liability |  | Loss
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Balance as of September 30, 2017 |  | $ | (3,214) |  | $ | (6,949) |  | $ | (10,163)
Change in period |  |  | (1,132) |  |  | 475 |  |  | (657)
Tax effect of change in period |  |  | — |  |  | (5) |  |  | (5)
Balance as of September 30, 2018 |  | $ | (4,346) |  | $ | (6,479) |  | $ | (10,825)
Change in period |  |  | (765) |  |  | (1,063) |  |  | (1,828)
Tax effect of change in period |  |  | — |  |  | 60 |  |  | 60
Balance as of September 30, 2019 |  | $ | (5,111) |  | $ | (7,482) |  | $ | (12,593)

The changes in the minimum pension liability are net of amortization of net loss of $127 thousand in 2019 and net gain of $151 thousand in 2018 included in net periodic pension cost.

7. Income Taxes

The components of income before income tax and income tax (benefit) expense are comprised of the following:

|  | For the Years Ended
|  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Income before income tax: |  |  |  |  |  |
U.S. |  | $ | (663) |  | $ | (1,077)
Foreign |  |  | 221 |  |  | (29)
|  | $ | (442) |  | $ | (1,106)
Income tax (benefit) expense: |  |  |  |  |  |
Current: |  |  |  |  |  |
Federal |  | $ | (141) |  | $ | 771
State |  |  | 122 |  |  | 47
Foreign |  |  | — |  |  | —
|  |  | (19) |  |  | 818
Deferred: |  |  |  |  |  |
Federal |  |  | (73) |  |  | 259
State |  |  | 21 |  |  | (118)
Foreign |  |  | — |  |  | (77)
|  |  | (52) |  |  | 64
|  | $ | (71) |  | $ | 882

As of September 30, 2019, management assessed the positive and negative evidence in the U.S. operations, and estimated we will have sufficient future taxable income to utilize the existing deferred tax assets, except for certain state net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Significant objective positive evidence included the cumulative profits that we realized over the most recent years. This evidence enhances our ability to consider other subjective evidence such as our projections for future growth. Other factors we considered are the likelihood for new revenue from cyber security products, continued royalty income in future years, and our expectation that the TS segment will continue to be profitable in future years. On the basis of this evaluation, as of September 30, 2019, we have concluded that our U.S. deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be realized. It should be noted however, that the amount of the deferred tax

58

Table of Contents

asset realized could be adjusted in future years, if estimates of taxable income during the carryforward periods are reduced, or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative loses is present.

The recording and ultimate reversal of valuation allowances for our deferred tax asset requires significant judgment associated with past and projected performance. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider our taxable future earnings and the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences. We recorded a valuation allowance which reduced the gross deferred tax asset to an amount that we believed was more likely than not to be realized because of the cumulative losses incurred in the U.K. in recent years, which represented sufficient negative evidence to record a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets.

We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.K. deferred tax assets as we have experienced cumulative loses and do not have any indication that the operation will be profitable in the future to an extent that will allow us to utilize much of our net operating loss carryforwards. To the extent that actual experience deviates from our assumptions, our projections would be affected and hence our assessment of realizability of our deferred tax assets may change.

Reconciliation of federal statutory rate and income tax expense to the Company’s effective tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:

|  | For the Years Ended September 30, |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |
|  | (Dollar amounts in thousands) |
Computed “expected” tax benefit |  | $ | (93) |  | 21.0 | % | $ | (269) |  | 24.3 | %
Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |  |  | (73) |  | 16.5 | % |  | (107) |  | 9.7 | %
Foreign operations |  |  | (46) |  | 10.4 | % |  | (70) |  | 6.3 | %
Permanent differences |  |  | 31 |  | (7.0) | % |  | (14) |  | 1.3 | %
Change in valuation allowance |  |  | 235 |  | (53.2) | % |  | 118 |  | (10.7) | %
Deferred revenue |  |  | (48) |  | 10.9 | % |  | — |  | — | %
Impact of 965 one-time transition tax |  |  | — |  | — | % |  | 771 |  | (69.7) | %
Federal tax rate change |  |  | — |  | — | % |  | 588 |  | (53.2) | %
Payable true up |  |  | 17 |  | (3.8) | % |  | — |  | — | %
Uncertain tax liability adjustment |  |  | (41) |  | 9.3 | % |  | 11 |  | (1.0) | %
Research & development credit |  |  | (90) |  | 20.4 | % |  | (125) |  | 11.3 | %
Other items |  |  | 37 |  | (8.4) | % |  | (21) |  | 2.0 | %
Income tax (benefit) expense |  | $ | (71) |  | 16.1 | % | $ | 882 |  | (79.7) | %

59

Table of Contents

For the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, temporary differences, which give rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities), are as follows:

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Deferred tax assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Pension |  | $ | 1,378 |  | $ | 1,390
Intangibles |  |  | 81 |  |  | 104
Other reserves and accruals |  |  | 291 |  |  | 451
Inventory reserves and other |  |  | 619 |  |  | 502
State credits, net of federal benefit |  |  | 380 |  |  | 380
Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards |  |  | 928 |  |  | 626
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards |  |  | 1,393 |  |  | 1,489
Foreign exchange on intercompany loan |  |  | 7 |  |  | 7
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | (232) |  |  | (396)
Gross deferred tax assets |  |  | 4,845 |  |  | 4,553
Less: valuation allowance |  |  | (2,899) |  |  | (2,658)
Realizable deferred tax asset |  |  | 1,946 |  |  | 1,895
Gross deferred tax liabilities |  |  | — |  |  | —
Net deferred tax assets |  | $ | 1,946 |  | $ | 1,895

The deferred tax valuation allowance increased by approximately $241 thousand, which was primarily due to the U. S. valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset for certain state net operating losses carryover. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers its taxable future earnings and the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance which reduces the gross deferred tax asset to an amount which management believes will more likely than not be realized. The valuation allowance was determined by assessing both positive and negative evidence whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are realizable. Such assessment is done on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. The Company's inability to project future profitability in certain states beyond fiscal year 2019 and the cumulative losses incurred in recent years in the U.K. represent sufficient negative evidence to record a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets.

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Reform Act") was enacted. The legislation significantly changes U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporate income tax rates, implementing a territorial tax system, expanding the tax base and imposing a tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Reform Act permanently reduces the U.S. corporate federal income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. The Company has recognized the impact of the Tax Reform Act in these consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in 2018. The impact of the remeasurement of the Company’s US deferred tax assets and liabilities to 21% resulted in a tax expense of approximately $0.6 million consisting of a reduction of the Company’s net deferred tax asset. The Company recorded tax expense of approximately $0.8 million related to the deemed repatriation tax.

The Company’s used a blended U.S. statutory tax rate for fiscal 2018 of 24.28% and in fiscal 2019 the corporate tax rate was 21%.

As of September 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards for federal purposes of approximately $2 million and $1 million, respectively, which are available to offset future taxable income

60

Table of Contents

with no expiration. The Company had U.S. net operating loss carryforwards for state purposes of approximately $4.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, which are available to offset future taxable income through 2035.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company had other state tax credit carryforwards of $55 thousand available to reduce future state tax expense which has unlimited carryover status.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company concluded that a net increase of $241 thousand of the valuation allowances for the U.S. was appropriate. As part of the Company’s analysis, the Company evaluated, among other factors, its recent history of generating taxable income in state jurisdictions and its near-term forecasts of future taxable income. The net increase in the Company’s valuation allowance of $241 thousand is to reserve for certain state net operating losses and state tax credit carryforwards that the Company believes will expire unused.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company had U.K. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8.2 million that have an indefinite life with no expiration.

Undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $11.0 million and $12.7 million at September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company's is considering cash distribution of undistributed foreign earnings in the future and will continue to assess the potential impact of any future distributions on U.S. Taxes. The state tax impact of a distribution of foreign earnings and profits would not be material.

In addition, the calculation of the Company's tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. The Company records liabilities for estimated tax obligations in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions. These estimated tax liabilities include the provision for taxes that may become payable in the future.

As of September 30, 2019, the total amount of uncertain tax liabilities was reversed since the statute of limitations have expired on the potential uncertain tax position.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

|  | For the Year Ended |  | For the Year Ended
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year |  | $ | 220 |  | $ | 209
Accrued penalties and interest |  |  | 13 |  |  | 11
Reversal for statute of limitations |  |  | (233) |  |  | —
Balance, end of period |  | $ | — |  | $ | 220

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has reviewed the tax positions taken on returns filed domestically and in its foreign jurisdictions for all open years, generally fiscal 2015 through 2019, and believes that tax adjustments in any audited year will not be material.

61

Table of Contents

8. Property, Equipment and Improvements, Net

Property, equipment and improvements, net consist of the following:

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Leasehold improvements |  | $ | 224 |  | $ | 224
Equipment |  |  | 8,397 |  |  | 7,574
Automobiles |  |  | 98 |  |  | 101
|  |  | 8,719 |  |  | 7,899
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |  |  | (7,446) |  |  | (7,052)
Property, equipment and improvements, net |  | $ | 1,273 |  | $ | 847

The Company uses the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets to record depreciation expense. Depreciation expense was $405 thousand and $506 thousand for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

9. Acquired Intangible Assets

As of September 30, 2019 and 2018, intangible assets are as follows:

|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
|  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Average |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Remaining |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Amortization |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  | Amortization |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |
|  | Period |  | Gross |  | Amortization |  | Net |  | Period |  | Gross |  | Amortization |  | Net
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Customer list |  | 5 years |  | $ | 910 |  | $ | 873 |  | $ | 37 |  | 6 years |  | $ | 910 |  | $ | 864 |  | $ | 46
Non-compete agreements |  | 0 years |  |  | 93 |  |  | 93 |  |  | — |  | 0 years |  |  | 93 |  |  | 93 |  |  | —
Developed technology |  | 0 years |  |  | 30 |  | $ | 30 |  | $ | — |  | 0 years |  |  | 30 |  | $ | 30 |  | $ | —
Trade name |  | 0 years |  |  | 140 |  | $ | 140 |  | $ | — |  | 0 years |  |  | 140 |  | $ | 138 |  | $ | 2
Total |  |  |  | $ | 1,173 |  | $ | 1,136 |  | $ | 37 |  |  |  | $ | 1,173 |  | $ | 1,125 |  | $ | 48

Amortization expense on these intangible assets was $11 thousand and $119 thousand for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Annual amortization expense related to intangible assets for each of the following successive fiscal years is as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  |  | 9
2021 |  |  | 9
2022 |  |  | 9
2023 |  |  | 9
2024 |  |  | 1
Total |  | $ | 37

62

Table of Contents

10. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:

|  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Accounts payable |  | $ | 13,495 |  | $ | 4,466
Commissions |  |  | 359 |  |  | 312
Compensation and fringe benefits |  |  | 992 |  |  | 1,836
Professional fees and shareholders’ reporting costs |  |  | 369 |  |  | 308
Taxes, other than income |  |  | 353 |  |  | 313
Warranty |  |  | 105 |  |  | 108
Other |  |  | 502 |  |  | 1,934
|  | $ | 16,175 |  | $ | 9,277

11. Note Payable

In September 2019, the Company borrowed $1.0 million with a 5.0% rate of interest related to a multi-year agreement with a customer (see Note 3 for the disclosure related to the receivable). Payments are due each month and maturities are outlined in the tables below.

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 359
2021 |  |  | 359
2022 |  |  | 359
Total |  |  | 1,077
Less: note discount |  |  | 76
Total |  | $ | 1,001

As of September 30, 2019 |  | (Amounts in thousands)
Current |  | $ | 359
Less: note discount |  |  | 42
Note payable - current portion |  | $ | 317
Noncurrent |  | $ | 718
Less: note discount |  |  | 34
Note payable - noncurrent portion |  | $ | 684

12. Product Warranties

Product warranty activity for the years ended September 30 was as follows:

|  | 2019 |  | 2018
Balance at the beginning of the period |  | $ | 107,538 |  | $ | 121,450
Accruals for warranties for products sold in the period |  |  | 34,207 |  |  | 26,539
Fulfillment of warranty obligations |  |  | (37,007) |  |  | (40,451)
Balance at the end of the period |  | $ | 104,738 |  | $ | 107,538

These amounts are within accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

63

Table of Contents

13. Stock Based Incentive Compensation

In 2015, the Company adopted the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2015 Plan") and authorized 300,000 shares of common stock to be reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. During 2019 an additional 300,000 shares of common stock were authorized to be reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. As of September 30, 2019, there were 320,715 shares available to be granted under the 2015 Plan. Under all of the stock incentive plans, both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted to officers, key employees and other persons providing services to the Company. All of the Company’s stock incentive plans have a ten year life.

Awards issued under any of the stock option plans are not affected by termination of the plan. The Company issues stock options at their fair market value on the date of grant. Vesting of stock options granted pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive plans is determined by the Company’s compensation committee. Generally, options granted to employees vest over four years and expire ten years from the date of grant. Options granted to non-employee directors have historically included cliff vesting after six months from the date of grant and expire three years from the date of grant. In fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Company granted certain officers including its Chief Executive Officer and non-employee directors, and key employees shares of nonvested common stock instead of stock options. The vesting periods for the officers’, the Chief Executive Officer’s and the non-employee directors’ nonvested stock awards are four years, three years and one year, respectively. The vesting period for the key employees’ awards is four years.

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and awards of nonvested stock based on estimated fair values, as described in Note 1. Stock-based compensation expense incurred and recognized for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to stock options and nonvested stock granted to employees and non-employee directors under the Company’s stock incentive and employee stock purchase plans totaled approximately $792 thousand and $691 thousand, respectively. The classification of the cost of stock-based compensation, in the consolidated statements of operations, is consistent with the nature of the services being rendered in exchange for the share based payment.

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:

|  | Years Ended
|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Cost of sales |  | $ | 7 |  | $ | 5
Engineering and development |  |  | 49 |  |  | 32
Selling, general and administrative |  |  | 736 |  |  | 654
Total |  | $ | 792 |  | $ | 691

For the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company granted 33,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 55,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 35,000 shares granted to the Chief Executive Officer, and 20,000 nonvested shares to its non-employee directors. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted 12,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 40,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 30,000 to its Chief Executive Officer and 20,000 nonvested shares to its non-employee directors.

The Company measures the fair value of nonvested stock awards based upon the market price of its common stock as of the date of grant. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate and the weighted average expected life of the options, at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is equal to the divided per share declared, divided by the closing share price on the date the options were granted. All equity compensation awards granted for the years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 were nonvested stock awards.

64

Table of Contents

As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, expense for grants beginning upon adoption on October 1, 2005 has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The forfeiture rates for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were based on actual forfeitures.

No cash was used to settle equity instruments granted under share-base payment arrangements in any of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2019.

The following tables provide summary data of stock option award activity:

|  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  |
|  |  |  | Weighted |  | Average |  | Aggregate
|  |  |  | average |  | Remaining |  | Intrinsic
|  | Number |  | exercise |  | Contractual |  | Value
|  | of Shares |  | price |  | Term |  | (in thousands)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017 |  | 9,376 |  |  | 4.49 |  | — |  |  | —
Granted |  | — |  | $ | — |  | — |  |  | —
Expired |  | (1,250) |  |  | 6.82 |  | — |  |  | —
Forfeited |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | —
Exercised |  | (4,626) |  |  | 4.67 |  | — |  |  | —
Outstanding at September 30, 2018 |  | 3,500 |  | $ | 3.42 |  | — |  |  | —
Granted |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | —
Expired |  | (500) |  | $ | 2.99 |  | — |  |  | —
Forfeited |  | — |  |  | — |  | — |  |  | —
Exercised |  | (1,000) |  |  | 2.99 |  | — |  |  | —
Outstanding at September 30, 2019 |  | 2,000 |  | $ | 3.75 |  | .98 Years |  | $ | 19
Exercisable at September 30, 2019 |  | 2,000 |  | $ | 3.75 |  | .98 Years |  | $ | 19
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2019 |  | 2,000 |  | $ | 3.75 |  | .98 Years |  | $ | 19

There were no stock options granted in the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $8 thousand and $34 thousand, respectively.The following table provides summary data of nonvested stock award activity:

|  |  |  | Weighted |  | Weighted |  |  |
|  |  |  | Average |  | Average |  | Aggregate
|  | Number of |  | grant date |  | Remaining |  | Intrinsic
|  | nonvested |  | Fair |  | Contractual |  | Value
|  | shares |  | Value |  | Term |  | (in thousands)
Nonvested shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 |  | 179,821 |  | $ | 8.64 |  | 2.23 Years |  | $ | 1,987
Activity in 2018: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  | 72,000 |  | $ | 11.83 |  | — |  |  | —
Vested |  | (80,969) |  | $ | 8.18 |  | — |  |  | —
Forfeited |  | (16,500) |  | $ | 8.90 |  | — |  |  | —
Nonvested shares outstanding at September 30, 2018 |  | 154,352 |  | $ | 10.34 |  | 2.11 Years |  | $ | 2,025
Activity in 2019: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  | 108,000 |  | $ | 9.98 |  | — |  |  | —
Vested |  | (68,867) |  | $ | 10.39 |  | — |  |  | —
Forfeited |  | (2,750) |  | $ | 8.91 |  | — |  |  | —
Nonvested shares outstanding at September 30, 2019 |  | 190,735 |  | $ | 10.12 |  | 2.21 Years |  | $ | 2,560
Vested at September 30, 2019 |  | 400,700 |  | $ | 7.17 |  | 0.20 Years |  | $ | 5,377
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2019 |  | 591,435 |  | $ | 8.12 |  | 0.85 Years |  | $ | 7,937

65

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2019, there was $1.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements (including nonvested stock awards) granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans. This cost is expected to be expensed over a weighted average period of approximately 2.50 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $716 thousand and $662 thousand, respectively.

14. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In December 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan covering up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock (the "ESPP"), which was ratified by a vote of the Company’s shareholders in February 2014. Under the ESPP, the Company’s employees may purchase shares of common stock at a price per share that is currently 95% of the lesser of the fair market value as of the beginning or end of semi-annual option periods. Pursuant to the ESPP, the Company issued 29,238 and 22,895 shares for the two years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively.

15. Pension and Retirement Plans

We have defined benefit and defined contribution plans in the U.K. and in the U.S. In the U.K., the Company provides defined benefit pension plans for certain employees and former employees and defined contribution plans for the majority of the employees. The defined benefit plans in the U.K. are closed to newly hired employees and have been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. In the U.S., the Company also provides defined contribution plans that cover most employees and supplementary retirement plans to certain employees and former employees who are now retired. These supplementary retirement plans are also closed to newly hired employees and have been for the two years ended September 30, 2019. These supplementary plans are funded through whole life insurance policies. The Company expects to recover all insurance premiums paid under these policies in the future, through the cash surrender value of the policies and any death benefits or portions thereof to be paid upon the death of the participant. These whole life insurance policies are carried on the balance sheet at their cash surrender values as they are owned by the Company and not assets of the defined benefit plans. In the U.S., the Company also provides for officer death benefits and post-retirement health insurance benefits through supplemental post-retirement plans to certain officers. The Company also funds these supplemental plans’ obligations through whole life insurance policies on the officers.

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company funds its pension plans in amounts sufficient to meet the requirements set forth in applicable employee benefits laws and local tax laws. Liabilities for amounts in excess of these funding levels are accrued and reported in the consolidated balance sheet.

The domestic supplemental retirement plans have life insurance policies which are not considered plan assets but were purchased by the Company as a vehicle to fund the costs of the plan. These insurance policies are included in the balance sheet at their cash surrender value, net of policy loans, aggregating $2.2 million and $2.1 million as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The loans against the policies have been taken out by the Company to pay the premiums. The costs and benefit payments for these plans are paid through operating cash flows of the Company to the extent that they cannot be funded through the use of the cash values in the insurance policies. The Company expects that the recorded value of the insurance policies will be sufficient to fund all of the Company’s obligations under these plans.

66

Table of Contents

Assumptions:

The following table provides the weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations at:

|  | Domestic |  | International |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2018 |
Discount rate: |  | 3.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 1.90 | % | 2.90 | %
Expected return on plan assets: |  |  |  |  |  | 3.40 | % | 3.80 | %
Rate of compensation increase: |  |  |  |  |  | — | % | — | %

The following table provides the weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended:

|  | Domestic |  | International |
|  | September 30, |  | September 30, |
|  | 2019 |  | 2018 |  | 2019 |  | 2018 |
Discount rate: |  | 4.00 | % | 3.75 | % | 1.90 | % | 2.80 | %
Expected return on plan assets: |  |  |  |  |  | 3.40 | % | 3.70 | %
Rate of compensation increase: |  |  |  |  |  | — | % | — | %

For domestic plans, the discount rate was determined by comparison against the FTSE pension liability index for AA rated corporate instruments. The Company monitors other indices to assure that the pension obligations are fairly reported on a consistent basis. The international discount rates were determined by comparison against country specific AA corporate indices, adjusted for duration of the obligation.

The periodic benefit cost and the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations are based on actuarial assumptions that are reviewed on an annual basis. The Company revises these assumptions based on an annual evaluation of long-term trends, as well as market conditions that may have an impact on the cost of providing retirement benefits.

67

Table of Contents

The components of net periodic benefit costs related to the U.S. and international plans are as follows:

|  | Year Ended September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | U.K. |  | U.S. |  | Total |  | U.K. |  | U.S. |  | Total
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Pension: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Interest cost |  | $ | 362 |  | $ | 24 |  | $ | 386 |  | $ | 370 |  | $ | 25 |  | $ | 395
Expected return on plan assets |  |  | (327) |  |  | — |  |  | (327) |  |  | (312) |  |  | — |  |  | (312)
Amortization of net gain (loss) |  |  | 149 |  |  | (3) |  |  | 146 |  |  | 170 |  |  | (1) |  |  | 169
Net periodic benefit cost |  | $ | 184 |  | $ | 21 |  | $ | 205 |  | $ | 228 |  | $ | 24 |  | $ | 252
Post Retirement: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Service cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | 34 |  | $ | 34 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 40 |  | $ | 40
Interest cost |  |  | — |  |  | 53 |  |  | 53 |  |  | — |  |  | 47 |  |  | 47
Amortization of net loss |  |  | — |  |  | (20) |  |  | (20) |  |  | — |  |  | (18) |  |  | (18)
Net periodic cost |  | $ | — |  | $ | 67 |  | $ | 67 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 69 |  | $ | 69
Pension: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Decrease in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | 914 |  |  | 18 |  | $ | 932 |  | $ | (462) |  | $ | (7) |  | $ | (469)
Post Retirement: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Decrease in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | 131 |  |  | 131 |  |  | — |  |  | (6) |  |  | (6)
Total: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Decrease in minimum liability included in comprehensive income (loss) |  | $ | 914 |  | $ | 149 |  | $ | 1,063 |  | $ | (462) |  | $ | (13) |  | $ | (475)

68

Table of Contents

The following table presents an analysis of the changes in 2019 and 2018 of the benefit obligation, the plan assets and the funded status of the plans:

|  | Years Ended September 30
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | Foreign |  | U.S. |  | Total |  | Foreign |  | U.S. |  | Total
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Pension: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance beginning of year |  | $ | 12,874 |  | $ | 585 |  | $ | 13,459 |  | $ | 13,285 |  | $ | 677 |  | $ | 13,962
Service cost |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | —
Interest cost |  |  | 362 |  |  | 24 |  |  | 386 |  |  | 370 |  |  | 25 |  |  | 395
Changes in actuarial assumptions |  |  | 1,273 |  |  | 15 |  |  | 1,288 |  |  | (165) |  |  | (7) |  |  | (172)
Foreign exchange impact |  |  | (772) |  |  | — |  |  | (772) |  |  | (364) |  |  | — |  |  | (364)
Benefits paid |  |  | (290) |  |  | (110) |  |  | (400) |  |  | (252) |  |  | (110) |  |  | (362)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year |  | $ | 13,447 |  | $ | 514 |  | $ | 13,961 |  | $ | 12,874 |  | $ | 585 |  | $ | 13,459
Changes in fair value of plan assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |  | $ | 8,270 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 8,270 |  | $ | 8,239 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 8,239
Actual gain on plan assets |  |  | 194 |  |  | — |  |  | 194 |  |  | 291 |  |  | — |  |  | 291
Company contributions |  |  | 545 |  |  | 110 |  |  | 655 |  |  | 227 |  |  | 110 |  |  | 337
Foreign exchange impact |  |  | (481) |  |  | — |  |  | (481) |  |  | (235) |  |  | — |  |  | (235)
Benefits paid |  |  | (290) |  |  | (110) |  |  | (400) |  |  | (252) |  |  | (110) |  |  | (362)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |  | $ | 8,238 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 8,238 |  | $ | 8,270 |  |  | — |  | $ | 8,270
Funded status \ net amount recognized |  | $ | (5,209) |  | $ | (514) |  | $ | (5,723) |  | $ | (4,604) |  | $ | (585) |  | $ | (5,189)
Post Retirement: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Change in projected benefit obligation (“PBO”): |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Balance beginning of year |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,318 |  | $ | 1,318 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,255 |  | $ | 1,255
Service cost |  |  | — |  |  | 34 |  |  | 34 |  |  | — |  |  | 40 |  |  | 40
Interest cost |  |  | — |  |  | 53 |  |  | 53 |  |  | — |  |  | 47 |  |  | 47
Changes in actuarial assumptions |  |  | — |  |  | 111 |  |  | 111 |  |  | — |  |  | (24) |  |  | (24)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,516 |  | $ | 1,516 |  | $ | — |  | $ | 1,318 |  | $ | 1,318
Funded status \ net amount recognized |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,516) |  | $ | (1,516) |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,318) |  | $ | (1,318)

69

Table of Contents

The amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:

|  | Years Ended September 30
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | Foreign |  | U.S. |  | Total |  | Foreign |  | U.S. |  | Total
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Pension: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accrued benefit liability |  | $ | (5,209) |  | $ | (514) |  | $ | (5,723) |  | $ | (4,604) |  | $ | (585) |  | $ | (5,189)
Deferred tax |  |  | — |  |  | 15 |  |  | 15 |  |  | (1) |  |  | 22 |  |  | 21
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  |  | 6,165 |  |  | 24 |  |  | 6,189 |  |  | 5,251 |  |  | 13 |  |  | 5,264
Net amount recognized |  | $ | 956 |  | $ | (475) |  | $ | 481 |  | $ | 646 |  | $ | (550) |  | $ | 96
Post Retirement: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accrued benefit liability |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,516) |  | $ | (1,516) |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,320) |  | $ | (1,320)
Deferred tax |  |  | — |  |  | 41 |  |  | 41 |  |  | — |  |  | 93 |  |  | 93
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |  |  | — |  |  | 113 |  |  | 113 |  |  | — |  |  | 34 |  |  | 34
Net amount recognized |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,362) |  | $ | (1,362) |  | $ | — |  | $ | (1,193) |  | $ | (1,193)
Total pension and post retirement: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accrued benefit liability |  | $ | (5,209) |  | $ | (2,030) |  | $ | (7,239) |  | $ | (4,604) |  | $ | (1,904) |  | $ | (6,508)
Deferred tax |  |  | — |  |  | 56 |  |  | 56 |  |  | (1) |  |  | 115 |  |  | 114
Accumulated other comprehensive income |  |  | 6,165 |  |  | 137 |  |  | 6,302 |  |  | 5,251 |  |  | 47 |  |  | 5,298
Net amount recognized |  | $ | 956 |  | $ | (1,837) |  | $ | (881) |  | $ | 646 |  | $ | (1,742) |  | $ | (1,096)
Accumulated Benefit Obligation: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Pension |  | $ | (13,447) |  | $ | (514) |  | $ | (13,961) |  | $ | (12,874) |  | $ | (585) |  | $ | (13,459)
Post Retirement |  |  | — |  |  | (1,516) |  |  | (1,516) |  |  | — |  |  | (1,320) |  |  | (1,320)
Total accumulated benefit obligation |  | $ | (13,447) |  | $ | (2,030) |  | $ | (15,477) |  | $ | (12,874) |  | $ | (1,905) |  | $ | (14,779)

Plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets are attributable to unfunded domestic supplemental retirement plans, and our U.K. retirement plan.

Accrued benefit liability reported as:

|  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Current accrued benefit liability |  | $ | 335 |  | $ | 340
Non-current accrued benefit liability |  |  | 6,904 |  |  | 6,168
Total accrued benefit liability |  | $ | 7,239 |  | $ | 6,508

As of September 30, 2019 and 2018, the amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income, consisted of deferred net losses totaling approximately $6.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

The amount of net deferred loss expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost for the year ending September 30, 2019, is approximately $229 thousand.

Contributions

The Company expects to contribute $0.4 million to its pension plans for fiscal 2020.

70

Table of Contents

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (amounts in thousands):

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 401
2021 |  | $ | 408
2022 |  | $ | 441
2023 |  | $ | 475
2024 |  | $ | 514
Thereafter |  | $ | 843

Plan Assets

At September 30, 2019, our pension plan in the U.K. was the only plan with assets, holding investments of approximately $8.2 million. Pension plan assets are managed by a fiduciary committee. The Company’s investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maximize the long-term rate of return on plan assets within an acceptable level of risk while maintaining adequate funding levels. Local regulations, local funding rules, and local financial and tax considerations are part of the funding and investment process. In deciding on the investments to be held, the trustees take into account the risk of possible fluctuations in income from, and market values of, the assets as well as the risk of departing from an asset profile which broadly matches the liability profile. The committee has invested the plan assets in a single pooled fund with an authorized investment company (the “Fund”). The Fund selected by the trustees is consistent with the plan’s overall investment principles and strategy described herein. There are no specific targets as to asset allocation other than those contained within the Fund that is managed by the authorized investment company.

The fair value of the assets held by the U.K. pension plan by asset category are as follows:

|  | Fair Values as of
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018
|  | Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as |  | Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
Asset Category |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3 |  | Total |  | Level 1 |  | Level 2 |  | Level 3
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
Cash on deposit |  | $ | 279 |  | $ | 279 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 36 |  | $ | 36 |  | $ | — |  | $ | —
Pooled funds |  |  | 7,959 |  |  | 7,959 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  |  | 8,234 |  |  | 8,234 |  |  | — |  |  | —
Total plan assets |  | $ | 8,238 |  | $ | 8,238 |  | $ | — |  | $ | — |  | $ | 8,270 |  | $ | 8,270 |  | $ | — |  | $ | —

The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are equal to the yields to maturity of appropriate indices for government and corporate bonds and by adding a premium to the government bond return for equities. The expected rate of return on cash is the Bank of England base rate in force at the effective date.

Level 1 investments represent mutual funds for which a quoted market price is available on an active market. These investments primarily hold stocks or bonds, or a combination of stocks and bonds.

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company has defined contribution plans in domestic and international locations under which the Company matches a portion of the employee’s contributions and may make discretionary contributions to the plans. The Company’s contributions were $178 thousand and $204 thousand for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

71

Table of Contents

16. Lines of Credit

As of September 30, 2018, the Company maintained a line of credit that allows for borrowings of up to $1.0 million. Availability under the facility was reduced by outstanding borrowings thereunder. The interest rates on outstanding borrowings was London Inter-Bank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") plus 2.5%, with a floor of 4%. Borrowings under the credit agreements are required to be repaid on demand in certain circumstances, upon termination of the agreements, or may be prepaid by the Company without penalty. The Company had no amounts outstanding under the line of credit during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. This line of credit closed during fiscal year 2019.

As of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, the Company also maintained an inventory line of credit that may be used by the TS segment in the U.S. to purchase inventory from approved vendors with payment terms which exceed those offered by the vendors. In fiscal year 2019, HPP gained access to this inventory line of credit, but did not use it in fiscal year 2019. No interest accrues under the inventory line of credit when advances are paid within terms, however, late payments are subject to an interest charge of Prime plus 5%. The credit agreement for the inventory line of credit contains financial covenants which require the Company to maintain the following TS segment-specific financial ratios: (1) a minimum current ratio of 1.2, (2) tangible net worth of no less than $4.0 million, and (3) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to total net worth of less than 5.0:1. As of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, Company borrowings under the inventory line of credit were $2.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

17. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company occupies office space under lease agreements expiring at various dates during the next two years, which all have renewal options and escalation clauses. The leases are classified as operating leases and provide for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance. The Company also leases equipment under lease agreements expiring at various dates during the next four years.

The Company was obligated under non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 475
2021 |  |  | 173
2022 |  |  | 58
2023 |  |  | 43
Total |  | $ | 749

Occupancy expenses under the operating leases approximated $0.7 million in 2019 and $0.8 million in 2018.

Capital Leases

The Company leases equipment under agreements expiring at various times during the next four years. The Company has the capital lease obligation within its consolidated balance sheets. The current portion of $0.4 million is within accounts payable and accrued expenses and the long-term portion of $0.3 million is included in other long term liabilities. The assets acquired under the capital leases were sub-leased to a customer. See Investment in Lease Note 4.

72

Table of Contents

The Company was obligated under non-cancelable capital leases as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30: |  | (Amounts in thousands)
2020 |  | $ | 363
2021 |  |  | 285
2022 |  |  | 51
2023 |  |  | 5
Minimum lease payments including interest |  | $ | 704
Amount representing interest |  |  | (46)
Minimum lease payments excluding interest |  | $ | 658

Common Stock Repurchase

From time to time the Company’s Board of Directors passes resolutions to authorize the Company to purchase shares of its outstanding common stock. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the years ended years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. As of September 30, 2019, the Company is authorized to repurchase an additional 201 thousand shares pursuant to such resolutions.

18. Segment Information

The following table presents certain operating segment information.

|  |  |  |  | Technology Solutions Segment |  |  |
|  | High |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Performance |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Products |  | United |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Consolidated
For the year ended September 30, |  | Segment |  | Kingdom |  | U.S. |  | Total |  | Total
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
2019 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  | $ | 6,406 |  | $ | 4,936 |  | $ | 54,675 |  | $ | 59,611 |  | $ | 66,017
Service |  |  | 1,496 |  |  | 380 |  |  | 11,168 |  |  | 11,548 |  |  | 13,044
Total sales |  |  | 7,902 |  |  | 5,316 |  |  | 65,843 |  |  | 71,159 |  |  | 79,061
Income (loss) from operations |  |  | (3,085) |  |  | (62) |  |  | 2,321 |  |  | 2,259 |  |  | (826)
Total assets |  |  | 11,548 |  |  | 10,530 |  |  | 37,291 |  |  | 47,821 |  |  | 59,369
Capital expenditures |  |  | 310 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 516 |  |  | 522 |  |  | 832
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 230 |  |  | 6 |  |  | 180 |  |  | 186 |  |  | 416
2018 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Sales: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Product |  | $ | 7,014 |  | $ | 7,501 |  | $ | 45,146 |  | $ | 52,647 |  | $ | 59,661
Service |  |  | 3,465 |  |  | 606 |  |  | 9,184 |  |  | 9,790 |  |  | 13,255
Total sales |  |  | 10,479 |  |  | 8,107 |  |  | 54,330 |  |  | 62,437 |  |  | 72,916
Income (loss) from operations |  |  | (2,777) |  |  | (475) |  |  | 1,651 |  |  | 1,176 |  |  | (1,601)
Total assets |  |  | 14,869 |  |  | 13,854 |  |  | 26,552 |  |  | 40,406 |  |  | 55,275
Capital expenditures |  |  | 99 |  |  | 1 |  |  | 338 |  |  | 339 |  |  | 438
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 243 |  |  | 7 |  |  | 375 |  |  | 382 |  |  | 625

Profit (loss) from operations is sales less cost of sales, engineering and development, selling, general and administrative expenses but is not affected by either non-operating charges/income or by income taxes. Non-operating charges/income consists principally of investment income and interest expense. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

73

Table of Contents

The following table details the Company’s sales by operating segment for fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The Company’s sales by geographic area based on the location of where the products were shipped or services rendered are as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | % of |
2019 |  | Americas |  | Europe |  | Asia |  | Total |  | Total |
|  | (Amounts in thousands) |
TS |  | $ | 67,228 |  | $ | 3,285 |  | $ | 646 |  | $ | 71,159 |  | 90 | %
HPP |  |  | 5,294 |  |  | 771 |  |  | 1,837 |  |  | 7,902 |  | 10 | %
Total |  | $ | 72,522 |  | $ | 4,056 |  | $ | 2,483 |  | $ | 79,061 |  | 100 | %
% of Total |  |  | 92 | % |  | 5 | % |  | 3 | % |  | 100 | % |  |
2018 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
TS |  | $ | 52,034 |  | $ | 9,059 |  | $ | 1,344 |  | $ | 62,437 |  | 86 | %
HPP |  |  | 8,424 |  |  | 1,266 |  |  | 789 |  |  | 10,479 |  | 14 | %
Total |  | $ | 60,458 |  | $ | 10,325 |  | $ | 2,133 |  | $ | 72,916 |  | 100 | %
% of Total |  |  | 83 | % |  | 14 | % |  | 3 | % |  | 100 | % |  |

Substantially all Americas amounts are United States.

Long-lived assets by geographic location at years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
North America |  | $ | 1,270 |  | $ | 844
Europe |  |  | 3 |  |  | 3
Totals |  | $ | 1,273 |  | $ | 847

Deferred tax assets by geographic location at years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

|  | September 30, |  | September 30,
|  | 2019 |  | 2018
|  | (Amounts in thousands)
North America |  | $ | 1,946 |  | $ | 1,895
Europe |  |  | — |  |  | —
Totals |  | $ | 1,946 |  | $ | 1,895

The following table lists customers from which the Company derived revenues in excess of 10% of total revenues for the years ended years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.

|  | For the years ended |
|  | September 30, 2019 |  | September 30, 2018 |
|  |  |  |  | % of |  |  |  |  | % of |
|  | Amount |  | Revenues |  | Amount |  | Revenues |
|  | (Amounts in millions) |
Customer A |  | $ | 3.8 |  | 5 | % | $ | 7.5 |  | 10 | %
Customer B |  | $ | 10.2 |  | 13 | % | $ | 1.1 |  | 3 | %

In addition, accounts receivable from Customer A totaled approximately $0.3 million, or 1%, and approximately $1.1 million, or 9%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. Accounts receivable and long term receivable from Customer B totaled approximately $7.4 million, or 36%, and approximately $0.2 million, or 2%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. We believe that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to the accounts receivable with these customers as of September 30, 2019. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019.

74

Table of Contents

19. Fair Value Disclosures

Under the fair value standards fair value is based on the exit price and defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement should reflect all the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A fair value hierarchy is established in the authoritative guidance outlined in three levels ranking from Level 1 to level 3 with Level 1 being the highest priority.

Level 1: observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly

Level 3: unobservable inputs (e.g., a reporting entity’s or other entity’s own data)

The Company had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring (except our pension plan assets, see Note 15) or non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2019 or September 30, 2018.

To estimate fair value of the financial instruments below quoted market prices are used when available and classified within Level 1. If this data is not available, we use observable market based inputs to estimate fair value, which are classified within Level 2. If the preceding information is unavailable, we use internally generated data to estimate fair value which is classified within Level 3.

|  | As of September 30, 2019 |  |  | As of September 30, 2018 |  |  |  |
|  | Carrying Amount |  |  | Fair Value |  |  | Carrying Amount |  |  | Fair Value |  | Fair Value Level |  | Reference
|  | (Amounts in thousands) |  |  |  |
Assets: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 18,099 |  | $ | 18,099 |  | $ | 25,107 |  | $ | 25,107 |  | 1 |  | Consolidated Balance Sheets
Accounts & long term receivable* |  | 7,087 |  |  | 7,087 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | 3 |  | Note 3
Liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Note payable |  | 1,001 |  |  | 1,001 |  |  | — |  |  | — |  | 2 |  | Note 11

*Original maturity over one year

Cash and cash equivalents

Carrying amount approximated fair value.

Accounts and long term receivable with original maturity over one year

Fair value was estimated by discounting future cash flows based on the current rate with similar terms.

Note Payable

Fair value was estimated based on quoted market prices.

Fair value of accounts receivable with an original maturity of one year or less and accounts payable was not materially different from their carrying values at September 30, 2019, and 2018.

75

Table of Contents

20. Dividend

For the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company declared and paid cash dividends as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Amount Paid
Fiscal Year |  | Date Declared |  | Record Date |  | Date Paid |  | Per Share
2018 |  | 12/19/2017 |  | 12/29/2017 |  | 1/16/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 2/12/2018 |  | 2/28/2018 |  | 3/16/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 5/9/2018 |  | 5/31/2018 |  | 6/15/2018 |  | $ | 0.11
2018 |  | 8/13/2018 |  | 8/31/2018 |  | 9/14/2018 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 12/27/2018 |  | 1/7/2019 |  | 1/22/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 2/12/2019 |  | 2/28/2019 |  | 3/14/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 5/8/2019 |  | 5/31/2019 |  | 6/14/2019 |  | $ | 0.15
2019 |  | 8/7/2019 |  | 8/30/2019 |  | 9/13/2019 |  | $ | 0.15

76