XML 54 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 5 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
5.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets, we do not amortize goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, but instead measure these assets for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that impairment exists. We amortize intangible assets that have definite lives so that the economic benefits of the intangible assets are being utilized over their weighted-average estimated useful life.

The impairment analysis of goodwill and intangible assets consists first of a review of various qualitative factors of the identified reporting units to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, including goodwill. This review includes, but is not limited to, an evaluation of the macroeconomic, industry or market, and cost factors relevant to the reporting unit as well as financial performance and entity or reporting unit events that may affect the value of the reporting unit. If this review leads to the determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, further impairment testing is not required. However, if this review cannot support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, or at our discretion, quantitative impairment steps are performed.

The quantitative impairment test for goodwill consists of a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit with the carrying amount of the reporting unit to which it is assigned. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The impairment test for intangible assets with indefinite lives consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with their carrying amounts. If the carrying value of the intangible assets exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We determine the fair value of the reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing based on a discounted cash flow model. We determine the fair value of our intangibles assets with indefinite lives (trademarks) through a royalty relief income valuation approach.

We have determined that during the third quarter of 2012 a triggering event, as defined within FASB ASC Topic 350, occurred as a result of the decrease in our market valuation in relation to our shareholder’s equity.   As such, we accelerated the review of our goodwill and intangible assets from October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012.  Based upon the results of that review, we have determined that no impairment was necessary for either goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible assets.

a. Goodwill

The following table summarizes the goodwill activity by segment for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011:

   
Battery &
Energy Products
   
Communications
Systems
   
Discontinued
Operations
   
Total
 
                         
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 4,758     $ 11,493     $ 2,025     $ 18,276  
                                 
Effect of foreign currency translations
    73       -       -       73  
                                 
Balance at October 2, 2011
    4,831       11,493       2,025       18,349  
                                 
Effect of foreign currency translations
    7       -       -       7  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2011
    4,838       11,493       2,025       18,356  
                                 
Sale of RedBlack Communications
                    (2,025 )     (2,025 )
Effect of foreign currency translations
    6       -       -       6  
                                 
Balance at September 30, 2012
  $ 4,844     $ 11,493     $ -     $ 16,337  

b. Intangible Assets

The composition of intangible assets was:

   
September 30, 2012
 
   
Gross
Assets
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Net
 
                   
Trademarks
  $ 3,564     $ -     $ 3,564  
Patents and technology
    4,493       3,635       858  
Customer relationships
    3,995       3,308       687  
Distributor relationships
    379       324       55  
Non-compete agreements
    216       216       -  
                         
Total intangible assets
  $ 12,647     $ 7,483     $ 5,164  

   
December 31, 2011
 
   
Gross
Assets
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Net
 
                   
Trademarks
  $ 3,563     $ -     $ 3,563  
Patents and technology
    4,492       3,440       1,052  
Customer relationships
    3,993       3,143       850  
Distributor relationships
    378       310       68  
Non-compete agreements
    396       396       -  
                         
Total intangible assets
  $ 12,822     $ 7,289     $ 5,533  

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $122 and $372 for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $155 and $469 for the three- and nine-month periods ended October 2, 2011, respectively.

The change in the cost value of total intangible assets from December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012 is a result of the effect of foreign currency translations and the disposition of fully amortized intangible assets in conjunction with our sale of RedBlack Communications.