5. GOODWILL	6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2025
GOODWILL
NOTE 5 - GOODWILL	NOTE 5—GOODWILL Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The Company tests for goodwill impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset is more likely than not impaired. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of February in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. The Company has one reporting unit. The Company had a goodwill balance of $8.0 million as of both September 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025. The goodwill resulted from the acquisition of MikaMonu Group Ltd. in fiscal 2016. The Company completed its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 and concluded that there was no impairment, as it was more likely than not that the fair value of its sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and the performance of a quantitative impairment test was not required.

5. GOODWILL

6 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2025

NOTE 5—GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The Company tests for goodwill impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset is more likely than not impaired. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of February in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. The Company has one reporting unit.

The Company had a goodwill balance of $8.0 million as of both September 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025. The goodwill resulted from the acquisition of MikaMonu Group Ltd. in fiscal 2016.

The Company completed its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 and concluded that there was no impairment, as it was more likely than not that the fair value of its sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and the performance of a quantitative impairment test was not required.