XML 34 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.26.1

Commitments and Contingencies | 3 Months Ended
--- | ---
Mar. 31, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] |
Commitments and Contingencies | 13. Commitments and Contingencies Warranty Liabilities The Company provides a limited warranty on most of the products it sells. The estimated warranty return costs associated with products sold through DTC channels are expensed at the time of sale and included in cost of revenues. The estimated warranty return costs associated with products sold through the wholesale channel are recorded at the time of sale and included as an offset to net revenues. Estimates for DTC warranty costs are based primarily on historical warranty claims, estimated warranty costs and the estimate warranty claim rate. Estimates for wholesale warranty costs are based primarily on the historical warranty claim amounts and the estimated claim rate and may be adjusted for any current or expected trends as appropriate. Actual warranty claim costs could differ from these estimates. The Company regularly assesses and adjusts the estimate of accrued warranty claims by updating claims rates for actual trends and projected claim costs. The Company classifies estimated warranty costs expected to be paid beyond a year as a long-term liability. The Company has accrued $27.5 million and $26.7 million in estimated future warranty costs as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Chief Executive Officer Cash Bonus Award On January 26, 2024, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) approved an amendment to the Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement. Under the amendment, the Company agreed that, among other things, the Chief Executive Officer will be eligible to earn a cash payment of up to $5.0 million, less tax and other required withholdings, based on the volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s Class A common stock on NASDAQ during the period from March 16, 2026 through June 30, 2026 subject to his continued employment with the Company. The amount earned will be payable in quarterly installments commencing with the first payroll period following June 30, 2026. The Company determined the provisions surrounding the future bonus payment require it to be accounted for as a liability at fair value on the date of the transaction, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period of change. The Company recorded a de minimis compensation expense reduction in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 related to this future bonus payment. Senior Leadership Team Special Recognition Bonus On January 26, 2024, the Board unanimously approved a special recognition bonus payment to certain members of the Company’s senior leadership team. The bonus was awarded to incentivize retention and continued engagement with the Company during these challenging times in the bedding industry. Each participant is eligible to earn a special recognition bonus payment equal to 15 months of their regular salary. The special recognition bonus payment is paid as follows, subject to the employee’s continued employment with the Company: 10% was paid in August 2024, 20% was paid in February 2025, and the remaining 70% was to be paid in August 2025. Certain members of the Company’s senior leadership team agreed to postpone their August 2025 payment until January 2026 for a 15% premium on the amount that was due to be paid in August 2025. Related to this bonus payment, the Company recorded no compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and a de minimis compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. Long-Term Incentive Cash Bonus Awards On July 17, 2025, the Board unanimously approved a long-term incentive cash award to those employees eligible to participate in the Company’s 2017 Plan. The incentive award payment is based on a combination of time-based payments over a three-year period and performance-based payments paid in three years if certain financial performance targets are met. On June 20, 2024, the Board unanimously approved a performance long-term incentive cash award to those employees eligible to participate in the Company’s 2017 Plan. The incentive award payment is based on a performance goal of the volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on NASDAQ on March 31, 2027. The Company determined the provisions surrounding the performance cash long-term incentive award require it to be accounted for as a liability at fair value at each reporting period, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings in the period of change. The Company recorded a de minimis amount of compensation expense in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 related to these future award payments. Rights of Securities Holders On January 23, 2024, in connection with the issuance of the 2024 Warrants, the Company entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement with holders of the Warrants (the “Holders”), providing for the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of the 2024 Warrants, the shares issuable upon the exercise of the 2024 Warrants and Common Stock held by the Holders as of such date, subject to customary terms and conditions. On March 12, 2025 in connection with the issuance of the 2025 Warrants, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Holders, providing for the registration of the 2025 Warrants, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants, and the Common Stock held by the Holders as of such date (the “Registrable Securities”). On May 2, 2025 in connection with the issuance of the 2025 Additional Warrants, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “Third Amended Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Holders, providing for the registration under the Securities Act of the 2025 Additional Warrants, the shares issuable upon the exercise of the 2025 Additional Warrants, other warrants held by the Holders (and shares issuable upon exercise thereof) and the Common Stock held by the Holders as of such date (the “2025 Additional Registrable Securities”), subject to customary terms and conditions. On May 2, 2025 in connection with the issuance of the SGI Warrants, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “SGI Registration Rights Agreement” and collectively with the 2025 Registration Rights Agreement and the Third Amended Registration Rights Agreement, the “Registration Rights Agreements”) with SGI, providing for the registration under the Securities Act of the SGI Warrants, the shares issuable upon the exercise of the SGI Warrants, and the Common Stock held by SGI as of such date (the “SGI Registrable Securities” and collectively with the 2025 Registrable Securities and 2025 Additional Registrable Securities, the “Registrable Securities”), subject to customary terms and conditions. The Registration Rights Agreements entitle the investors party thereto to demand registration of the Registrable Securities and also to piggyback on the registration of Company securities by the Company and other Company securityholders. The Company will be responsible for the payment of the Holders’ expenses in connection with any offering or sale of Registrable Securities, including underwriting discounts or selling commissions, placement agent or broker fees or similar discounts, commissions or fees relating to the sale of certain Registrable Securities. The registration statement filed on May 23, 2025, which registered the Registrable Securities, was declared effective by the SEC on May 30, 2025. SGI Commercial Arrangements On May 2, 2025, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Master Retailer Agreement (the “MRA Amendment”) with Mattress Firm, a business unit of SGI, which provides that SGI, through its Mattress Firm stores, will expand its inventory of the Company’s products across its national store network from approximately 5,000 mattress slots to a minimum of 12,000 mattress slots. The agreement includes a $3.5 million fee to be paid by the Company to reimburse Mattress Firm for certain costs in transitioning to the product placement required by the agreement. The fee is accounted for under the provisions of ASC 606—Revenue from Contracts with Customers as consideration payable to a customer as a reduction of revenue over the life of the contract and is included in accrued rebates and allowances on the audited consolidated balance sheets. The Company recorded $0.3 million as a reduction of revenue in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Also on May 2, 2025, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Master Vendor Supply and Services Agreement (the “Sherwood Agreement” and together with the MRA Amendment the “SGI Agreements”) with Tempur Sherwood, LLC, a subsidiary of Tempur Sealy. The Sherwood Agreement provides that Tempur Sherwood, LLC will have the exclusive right to assemble certain product lines, such as Purple Royale, that the Company sells to Mattress Firm. The SGI Agreements expire on December 31, 2027. Revenue for certain product arrangements is presented differently depending on the nature of the underlying manufacturing relationships and the application of ASC 606—Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under the guidance, payments to Tempur Sherwood, LLC are evaluated to determine whether they are economically linked to the underlying customer arrangement. The Company has concluded that payments to Tempur Sherwood, LLC are economically linked to the Mattress Firm MRA Amendment and therefore represent consideration payable to a customer. As a result of the Purple Royale launch, these payments are recorded as a reduction of revenue, and revenue is presented on a net basis. The Company recorded $4.9 million in consideration paid to Tempur Sherwood, LLC as a reduction of revenue in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026. In connection with the SGI Agreements, the Company issued to SGI the SGI Warrants to purchase 8.0 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a strike price of $1.50 per share. The SGI Warrants include full-ratchet anti-dilution protections, subject to a floor of $0.6979 with respect to adjustments to the exercise price and expire on March 12, 2035. The Company determined the warrants are required to be accounted for as a liability at the fair value of $6.5 million on the date of the transaction (see Note 11 – Warrant Liabilities). The fair value of the warrants on the date of the transaction is accounted for under the provisions of ASC 606—Revenue from Contracts with Customers and deemed to be consideration payable to a customer as a reduction of revenue over the life of the contract. The Company recorded $0.6 million as a reduction of revenue in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Non-Income Related Taxes The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., No.17-494, reversed a longstanding precedent that remote sellers are not required to collect state and local sales taxes. The Company cannot predict the effect of these and other attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on e-commerce. The Company currently collects and reports on sales tax in all states in which it does business. However, the application of existing, new or revised taxes on the Company’s business, in particular, sales taxes, value-added tax and similar taxes would likely increase the cost of doing business online and decrease the attractiveness of selling products over the internet. The application of these taxes on the Company’s business could also create significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture data and collect and remit taxes. There have been, and will continue to be, substantial ongoing costs associated with complying with the various indirect tax requirements in the numerous markets in which the Company conducts or will conduct business. Legal Proceedings On December 16, 2022, Purple’s founders filed a complaint against Purple Inc. in the Fourth Judicial District Court in the State of Utah. In that suit, the plaintiffs alleged that they each entered into employment agreements with Purple LLC in February 2018. The plaintiffs contended that certain corporate transactions reduced their “ownership interest and voting power in Purple” and that, as a result, they should have continued to be paid a salary when they retired from Purple LLC. The plaintiffs calculated that they were each owed “no less than $500,000” in unpaid salary. In October 2023, the Court granted Purple Inc.’s motion and ordered that the claims brought by the plaintiffs be dismissed in full, with prejudice. The Court entered a final judgment dismissing the case in January 2024. The plaintiffs appealed. After oral arguments, on April 3, 2025, the Utah Court of Appeals ordered the case return to the District Court for further fact finding. The Utah Supreme Court declined to hear the case, sending back for further action at the trial court that we expect will continue throughout 2026. The Company maintains insurance to cover the costs of defending against claims of this nature and intends to continue to vigorously defend against these claims in the course of the plaintiffs’ appeal. On April 3, 2023, Purple’s founders filed a complaint against Purple LLC in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint alleges that Purple LLC breached the limited liability company agreement of Purple LLC by failing to pay the full amount of tax distributions owed under the agreement. The plaintiffs seek damages of approximately $3.0 million in allegedly unpaid tax distributions as well as legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with the litigation. On June 13, 2023, Purple LLC filed an answer to the complaint denying the plaintiffs’ allegations, setting forth its affirmative defenses, and requesting dismissal of all claims and entry of judgment in Purple LLC’s favor. A trial date has been set for October 2026. The outcome of the litigation cannot be predicted at this stage in the proceedings. Purple LLC denies all allegations and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. On April 16, 2024, Purple’s founders, in their capacity as a former landlord of Purple LLC, brought a lawsuit against Purple LLC, as lessee, for amounts allegedly owed under a real estate lease which the parties terminated effective September 30, 2023. In the suit, the plaintiffs allege approximately $2.5 million in damages, based primarily on a dispute regarding whether Purple LLC left the premises in the condition required by the lease. The plaintiffs further claim approximately $0.8 million in holdover rent, as well as unspecified amounts in interest, late fees, liquidated damages, attorney fees and costs. Fact discovery is scheduled to conclude in 2026. The court has not yet set a date for trial. Purple LLC denies all allegations and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. On July 24, 2024, a former part-time employee filed a class action lawsuit against Purple LLC in California Superior Court in the County of Alameda alleging failure to pay all wages, failure to pay overtime pay rate, failure to provide all meal periods, and other employment-related causes of action. The suit seeks damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief on behalf of all non-exempt California employees of Purple LLC during the applicable statutory periods. On September 30, 2024, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding a claim for penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act. Purple LLC and the plaintiffs mediated the claims on May 8, 2025, which resulted in the parties agreeing to a settlement. The settlement agreement has been signed by the parties and are currently waiting for the California Superior Court to approve the settlement. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). The Company estimates that approximately $5.3 million of its previous tariff payments are subject to this ruling. On March 6, 2026, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade against the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), the CBP commissioner, and the United States of America seeking a full refund of all IEEPA tariffs that the Company has paid to the United States. The financial impact of these events is uncertain, as it is unclear to what extent duties will be refunded by CBP, what processes will govern such refunds, or if the Company can fully collect the related amounts claimed. No adjustments have been recorded in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as the Company will apply the involuntary conversion model which results in recognition of recoveries when reimbursement is probable. The Company is from time to time involved in various other claims, legal proceedings and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that adverse decisions in any such pending or threatened proceedings, or any amount that the Company might be required to pay by reason thereof, would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or future results of the Company.

X
- References No definition available. + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/440/tableOfContent Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 450 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/450/tableOfContent Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef -Topic 405 -SubTopic 30 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/405-30/tableOfContent Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 954 -SubTopic 440 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478522/954-440-50-1 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -Subparagraph (c) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147482648/440-10-50-4 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration