XML 53 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND IMPAIRMENT
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
5.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND IMPAIRMENT
 
Goodwill
 
The carrying value of goodwill was $12,308,661 and $12,308,661 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
 
Identifiable intangible assets
 
The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
 
 
2013
 
 
2012
 
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
4,631,577
 
$
5,551,149
 
Amortization expense
 
 
(907,223)
 
 
(919,572)
 
Balance at end of year
 
$
3,724,354
 
$
4,631,577
 
 
The Company has recorded the fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, using the income approach. The following table sets forth the components of these intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
 
 
Estimated
 
Adjusted
 
 
 
 
Net
 
 
 
Useful
 
Carrying
 
Accumulated
 
as of
 
 
 
Life
 
Amount
 
Amortization
 
12/31/2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade name
 
20 years
 
$
704,458
 
$
(260,641)
 
$
443,817
 
Patents and copyrights
 
17 years
 
 
1,117,842
 
 
(454,421)
 
 
663,421
 
Non-compete agreements
 
5 years
 
 
310,000
 
 
(268,667)
 
 
41,333
 
Developed technology
 
7 years
 
 
3,941,310
 
 
(3,295,135)
 
 
646,175
 
Backlog
 
3 years
 
 
303,400
 
 
(303,400)
 
 
-
 
Non-contractual customer relationships
 
15 years
 
 
3,268,568
 
 
(1,338,960)
 
 
1,929,608
 
 
 
 
 
$
9,645,578
 
$
(5,921,224)
 
$
3,724,354
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
 
 
Adjusted
 
 
 
 
Net
 
 
 
Carrying
 
Accumulated
 
as of
 
 
 
Amount
 
Amortization
 
12/31/2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade name
 
$
704,458
 
$
(229,975)
 
$
474,483
 
Patents and copyrights
 
 
1,117,842
 
 
(396,575)
 
 
721,267
 
Non-compete agreements
 
 
310,000
 
 
(206,667)
 
 
103,333
 
Developed technology
 
 
3,941,310
 
 
(2,760,370)
 
 
1,180,940
 
Backlog
 
 
303,400
 
 
(303,400)
 
 
-
 
Non-contractual customer relationships
 
 
3,268,568
 
 
(1,117,014)
 
 
2,151,554
 
 
 
$
9,645,578
 
$
(5,014,001)
 
$
4,631,577
 
 
The following summarizes amortization of acquisition related intangible assets included in the statement of operations:
 
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales
 
$
771,416
 
$
771,416
 
General and administrative
 
 
135,807
 
 
148,156
 
 
 
$
907,223
 
$
919,572
 
 
The Company expects that amortization expense for the next five succeeding years will be as follows:
 
2014
 
$
416,657
2015
 
$
310,458
2016
 
$
310,458
2017
 
$
310,458
2018
 
$
310,458
 
These amounts are subject to change based upon the review of recoverability and useful lives that are performed at least annually. 
 
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment
 
The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets of acquired businesses is considered goodwill.  Under authoritative guidance, purchased goodwill is not amortized, but rather it is periodically reviewed for impairment.  The Company had goodwill of $12,308,661 and $12,308,661 at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  This goodwill resulted from the acquisitions of Mobilisa, Inc. and Positive Access Corporation.  
 
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill and concluded that no impairment charge was required for either year. Under authoritative guidance, the Company can use industry and Company specific qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that impairment exists, before using a two-step quantitative analysis. Events or changes in circumstances which could trigger an impairment review include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, other entity specific events and sustained decrease in share price.
 
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, after a review of these qualitative factors, the Company determined that it was necessary to perform a two-step quantitative analysis. The first step is to compare the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit, including goodwill to its carrying value.  If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not impaired otherwise, there is an indication that goodwill may be impaired and the amount of loss, if any is measured by performing step two.  Under step two, the impairment loss, if any, is measured by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of Goodwill.
 
The Company engaged an outside consulting firm to perform this analysis. This firm appraised the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit is excess of its carrying value as of the reporting date, so no second step was necessary. The firm used the income approach, on a debt-free basis, to perform its analysis, because of the uniqueness of the Company and unrepresentative nature of the Company’s historical performance.
 
Based on the outside consultant’s report and the Company’s review of its market capitalization and movement in stock price, Management determined that no impairment of Goodwill exists as of December 31, 2013. 
 
The Company also considered whether long-lived assets including intangibles were also impaired.  These assets are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, which is provided for by charges to income on a basis consistent with the utilization of the assets over their useful lives.   The carrying value of intangible and long-lived assets is reviewed periodically by the Company for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment.  If such circumstances exist, the Company would estimate the future, undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset, and compare that to the carrying value.  If the carrying value exceeds the estimated cash flows, the asset would be written down to its estimated fair value.  As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company determined that there was no impairment of intangible assets.