XML 16 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Intangible Assets and Goodwill

3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

 

The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets for six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2014   $ 3,307,797  
Addition: Acquisition of patent     125,000  
Deduction: Amortization expense     (504,207 )
Balance at June 30, 2015   $ 2,928,590  

 

The following summarizes amortization of intangible assets included in the statement of operations:

 

    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2015     2014     2015     2014  
Cost of sales   $ 59,163     $ 59,163     $ 229,735     $ 183,191  
General and administrative     138,520       33,952       274,472       67,904  
    $ 197,683     $ 93,115     $ 504,207     $ 251,095  

 

As a result of a decline in the Company’s stock price during the second quarter of 2015, the Company concluded that this development was deemed a “triggering” event requiring that goodwill be tested for impairment as of June 30, 2015.

 

The carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill was $8,101,661 as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Company performed the first step of the goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2015 in order to identify potential impairment by comparing its fair value to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value was determined using certain valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis and an estimation of an implied control premium, in addition to the Company’s market capitalization on the measurement date. The implied control premium selected was developed based on certain observable market data of comparable companies. The market capitalization is sensitive to the volatility of the Company’s stock price. Based upon the first step of the goodwill impairment test performed as of June 30, 2015, the Company determined that the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess of its carrying amount by approximately 21% and therefore the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.