20-F 1 zk1618397.htm 20-F

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

o | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Or

x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

Or

o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report……………….. For the transition period from to

Commission File number: 000-23288
SILICOM LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter and as translated into English)

ISRAEL
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

14 Atir Yeda Street,
Kfar Sava 4464323, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)
Mr. Eran Gilad, CFO and Company Secretary
Telephone: +972-9-764-4555
E-mail: erang@silicom.co.il
14 Atir Yeda Street,
Kfar Sava 4464323, Israel
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None |  | None
Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares, NIS 0.01 nominal value per share |  | NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
7,311,563
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No x
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No x
Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o |  | Accelerated filer x |  | Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this fling:
US GAAP x International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board o Other o
If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
2

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes o No o
This annual report on Form 20-F includes certain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The use of the words “projects,” “expects,” “may,” “plans” or “intends”, or words of similar import, identifies a statement as “forward-looking.” There can be no assurance, however, that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations or projections. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations or projections include the risks and uncertainties relating to our business described in this report at Item 3 titled “Risk Factors.”
As used herein or in any document incorporated by reference hereto, the “Company”, “Silicom Ltd.”, “Silicom”, “Registrant”, “we”, “us”, or “our” refers to Silicom Ltd. and its subsidiaries. We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in United States dollars and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. All references herein to “dollars” or “$” are to United States dollars, and all references to “Shekels” or “NIS” are to New Israeli Shekels.
3

Table of Contents

PART I. | 6
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS | 6
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE | 7
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION | 7
A. Selected Financial Data |  | 7
B. Capitalization and indebtedness | 11
C. Reason for the offer and use of proceeds | 11
D. Risk Factors | 11
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY. | 27
A. History and Development of the Company |  | 27
B. Business Overview |  | 29
Principal Markets | 32
Manufacturing and Suppliers | 32
Marketing Channels | 35
Patents and Licenses | 37
Competition | 38
Governmental Regulation Affecting the Company | 39
C. Organizational Structure |  | 40
D. Property, Plant and Equipment |  | 40
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 41
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS | 41
Critical Accounting Policies | 42
A. Operating Results | 45
Impact of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations, Liabilities and Assets | 49
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources | 49
C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc. | 51
D. Trend Information | 53
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements | 54
F. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations | 55
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES | 56
A. Directors and Senior Management | 56
B. Compensation | 59
C. Board Practices | 62
Board of Directors | 64
External Directors | 64
Audit Committee | 68
Compensation Committee | 70
Internal Auditor | 75
D. Employees | 75
E. Share Ownership | 77

4

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | 78
A. Major Shareholders | 78
B. Related Party Transactions | 79
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING | 84
A. Offer and listing details | 84
Markets and Share Price History | 84
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 115
Interest Rate Risk | 115
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk | 116
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES | 118
PART II. | 118
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES | 118
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 118
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 118
Disclosure Controls and Procedures | 118
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | 118
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls | 119
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting | 119
ITEM 15T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 119
ITEM 16. RESERVED | 119
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT | 119

5

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS | 120
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES | 120
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES | 120
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS | 121
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT | 121
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 121
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE | 123
PART III. | 123
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 123
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 123
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS | 123

6

Part I.
Item 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not Applicable.
Item 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not Applicable.
Item 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected Financial Data
The selected data presented below under the captions “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheets Data” for and as of the end of each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2015, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the report thereon, are included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which are set forth in Item 18 – “Financial Statements” and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this annual report.
7

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  |  | 2014 |  |  |  | 2015 |
Sales |  | $ | 39,633 |  |  | $ | 48,729 |  |  | $ | 73,298 |  |  | $ | 75,622 |  |  | $ | 82,738 |
Cost of sales |  |  | 22,430 |  |  |  | 28,849 |  |  |  | 43,865 |  |  |  | 44,835 |  |  |  | 48,659 |
Gross profit |  |  | 17,203 |  |  |  | 19,880 |  |  |  | 29,433 |  |  |  | 30,787 |  |  |  | 34,079 |
Research and development costs |  |  | 4,165 |  |  |  | 4,401 |  |  |  | 5,465 |  |  |  | 6,480 |  |  |  | 9,702 |
Sales and marketing expenses |  |  | 2,677 |  |  |  | 3,081 |  |  |  | 3,818 |  |  |  | 4,418 |  |  |  | 5,651 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 1,890 |  |  |  | 2,369 |  |  |  | 2,572 |  |  |  | 2,798 |  |  |  | 3,611 |
Contingent consideration expense (benefit) |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | (3,090 | )
Total operating expenses |  |  | 8,732 |  |  |  | 9,851 |  |  |  | 11,855 |  |  |  | 13,741 |  |  |  | 15,874 |
Operating income |  |  | 8,471 |  |  |  | 10,029 |  |  |  | 17,578 |  |  |  | 17,046 |  |  |  | 18,205 |
Financial income, net |  |  | 439 |  |  |  | 752 |  |  |  | 404 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 220 |
Income before income taxes |  |  | 8,910 |  |  |  | 10,781 |  |  |  | 17,982 |  |  |  | 17,309 |  |  |  | 18,425 |
Income tax expenses |  |  | 667 |  |  |  | 910 |  |  |  | 905 |  |  |  | 2,704 |  |  |  | 1,905 |
Net income(1) |  |  | 8,243 |  |  |  | 9,871 |  |  |  | 17,077 |  |  |  | 14,605 |  |  |  | 16,520 |
Net income per share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic income per ordinary share |  | $ | 1.195 |  |  | $ | 1.424 |  |  | $ | 2.404 |  |  | $ | 2.033 |  |  | $ | 2.273 |
Diluted income per ordinary share |  | $ | 1.178 |  |  | $ | 1.417 |  |  | $ | 2.357 |  |  | $ | 1.996 |  |  | $ | 2.242 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to compute basic income per share (in thousands) |  |  | 6,896 |  |  |  | 6,934 |  |  |  | 7,103 |  |  |  | 7,184 |  |  |  | 7,269 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to compute diluted income per share (in thousands) |  |  | 6,995 |  |  |  | 6,968 |  |  |  | 7,246 |  |  |  | 7,319 |  |  |  | 7,368 |

(1) Net income is after deduction of taxes on income, which have been reduced by virtue of tax benefits to which the Company is entitled in its capacity as an "Approved Enterprise, "Benefited Enterprise" or "Preferred Enterprise", as applicable with respect to each of the years indicated above, under Israeli law. As such, the Company was required to pay taxes at a reduced effective rate. The Company selected the 2004 tax year (for which the tax benefits ended at the end of 2013), the 2006 tax year, the 2009 tax year and the 2012 tax year as its Year of Election under its capacity as Approved Enterprise or Benefited Enterprise for each of the Years of Election. In 2014 the Company elected to be taxed under its capacity as a Preferred Enterprise, following which its benefits under the Investment Law under its capacities as Approved Enterprise or Benefited Enterprise, as applicable, were ceased. As of 2014, the benefits under the Investment Law under the Company's capacity as a Preferred Enterprise commenced. See Note 14C to the Financial Statements and “Item 10” - Additional Information - Taxation.”
8

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA

|  | 2011 |  |  | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
Total assets |  | $ | 72,865 |  |  | $ | 89,033 |  |  | $ | 105,257 |  |  | $ | 122,436 |  |  | $ | 139,998 |
Total current liabilities |  | $ | 6,438 |  |  | $ | 11,789 |  |  | $ | 11,948 |  |  | $ | 19,006 |  |  | $ | 19,814 |
Long-term liability |  | $ | 2,153 |  |  | $ | 2,278 |  |  | $ | 2,618 |  |  | $ | 2,698 |  |  | $ | 7,350 |
Shareholders' equity |  | $ | 64,274 |  |  | $ | 74,966 |  |  | $ | 90,691 |  |  | $ | 100,732 |  |  | $ | 112,834 |
Capital stock |  | $ | 20 |  |  | $ | 21 |  |  | $ | 21 |  |  | $ | 21 |  |  | $ | 21 |
Number of ordinary shares issued(1) |  |  | 6,940,059 |  |  |  | 7,022,397 |  |  |  | 7,154,984 |  |  |  | 7,233,604 |  |  |  | 7,299,315 |

(1) Including 14,971 held by one of our subsidiaries - Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. Under the Israeli Companies Law 5759-1999 (the "Companies Law") these shares held by such subsidiary are non-voting shares.
The following table sets forth information regarding the exchange rates of U.S. dollars per NIS for the periods indicated. Average rates are calculated by using the daily representative rates as reported by the Bank of Israel on the last day of each month during the periods presented.

|  | NIS per U.S. $ |
Year Ended December 31, |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | Average |  |  | Period End |
2015 |  |  | 4.053 |  |  |  | 3.761 |  |  |  | 3.887 |  |  |  | 3.902 |
2014 |  |  | 3.994 |  |  |  | 3.402 |  |  |  | 3.577 |  |  |  | 3.889 |
2013 |  |  | 3.728 |  |  |  | 3.471 |  |  |  | 3.601 |  |  |  | 3.471 |
2012 |  |  | 4.028 |  |  |  | 3.715 |  |  |  | 3.844 |  |  |  | 3.733 |
2011 |  |  | 3.821 |  |  |  | 3.395 |  |  |  | 3.582 |  |  |  | 3.821 |

9

The following table sets forth the high and low daily representative rates for the NIS as reported by the Bank of Israel for each of the prior six months.

|  | NIS per U.S. $ |
Month |  | High |  |  | Low |  |  | Average |  |  | Period End |
March 2016 |  |  | 3.912 |  |  |  | 3.766 |  |  |  | 3.868 |  |  |  | 3.766 |
February 2016 |  |  | 3.964 |  |  |  | 3.871 |  |  |  | 3.908 |  |  |  | 3.91 |
January 2016 |  |  | 3.983 |  |  |  | 3.913 |  |  |  | 3.950 |  |  |  | 3.951 |
December 2015 |  |  | 3.905 |  |  |  | 3.855 |  |  |  | 3.881 |  |  |  | 3.902 |
November 2015 |  |  | 3.921 |  |  |  | 3.868 |  |  |  | 3.889 |  |  |  | 3.877 |
October 2015 |  |  | 3.923 |  |  |  | 3.816 |  |  |  | 3.863 |  |  |  | 3.867 |

The NIS to U.S. Dollar exchange rate on March 31, 2016, as published by the Bank of Israel, was NIS 3.766.
Dividends
Prior to 2013, we had not paid dividends to our shareholders. On January 14, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors adopted a policy for distributing dividends, subject to all applicable laws. According to this policy, each year we will distribute a dividend of up to 50% of our annual distributable profits. As part of the stated policy, the Company's Board of Directors reserves the right to declare additional dividend distributions, to change the rate of dividend distributions (either as a policy or on a one-time basis), to cancel a specific distribution or to cancel the policy as a whole at any time, at its sole discretion. The actual distribution of a dividend will be subject to meeting the conditions required by applicable law, including the distribution tests set forth in Section 302 of the Companies Law, and to the specific decision of the Company's Board of Directors for each distribution. Future dividend policies will be reviewed by the Board of Directors based upon conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors. Our ability to pay cash dividends may be restricted by instruments governing any of our obligations.
Dividends paid by an Israeli resident company to non-Israeli shareholders are generally subject to withholding tax in Israel at a rate of up to 25% (or 30% if such non-Israeli shareholder is a “substantial shareholder”), but the actual withholding rate may be lower or higher than 25% depending upon the type of shareholder. In our case, the applicable withholding tax rate will also depend on the particular Israeli production facilities that have generated the earnings that are the source of the specific dividend and, accordingly, the applicable withholding rate may change from time to time.
On March 18, 2013 our Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $0.55 (NIS 2.03 according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 18, 2013, as reported by the Bank of Israel) per share payable on April 17, 2013 to shareholders of record as of April 4, 2013, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $3.9 million (approximately NIS 14.4 million according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 18, 2013, as reported by the Bank of Israel) for 2012. Taxes were withheld at source by the Company as required pursuant to Israeli law.
10

On March 18, 2014 our Board of Directors declared a continuing dividend for 2013 of US $1.00 (NIS 3.462 according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 18, 2014, as reported by the Bank of Israel) per share payable on April 17, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 3, 2014, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.2 million (approximately 24.9 million according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 18, 2014, as reported by the Bank of Israel) for 2013. Taxes were withheld at source by the Company as required pursuant to Israeli law.
On March 23, 2015 our Board of Directors declared a continuing dividend for 2014 of US $1.00 (NIS 4.018 according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 23, 2015, as reported by the Bank of Israel) per share payable on April 21, 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 6, 2015, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.3 million (approximately 29.3 million according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 23, 2015, as reported by the Bank of Israel) for 2014. Taxes were withheld at source by the Company as required pursuant to Israeli law.
On March 21, 2016 our Board of Directors declared a continuing dividend for 2015 of US $1.00 (NIS 3.855 according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 21, 2016, as reported by the Bank of Israel) per share payable on April 14, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 4, 2016, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.3 million (approximately 28.1 million according to the NIS-USD exchange rate as of March 21, 2016, as reported by the Bank of Israel) for 2015. Taxes were withheld at source by the Company as required pursuant to Israeli law.
For more information on the taxation of dividends generally, and for our calculation of the tax withheld on the dividends paid as detailed above, see the section entitled “Taxation of Dividends” in Section 10.E “Taxation”.
Holders of our ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States, Israeli or other tax consequences of the receipt of any dividend distributions made to our shareholders, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local taxes, and of any taxes withheld at source by the Company.
B. Capitalization and indebtedness
Not Applicable
C. Reason for the offer and use of proceeds
Not Applicable
D. Risk Factors
This annual report and statements that we may make from time to time may contain forward-looking information. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations, statements or projections. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations, statements or projections include the risks and uncertainties relating to our business described below.
11

Risks Relating to Our Business
The markets for our products change rapidly and demand for new products is difficult to predict.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. For example, the migration to higher line rate Ethernet solutions, the adaptation of new bus interfaces and increased use of emerging technologies such as Cloud, Virtualization and SDN, cause our OEM customers to demand such new products and technologies. In the event that our OEM customers decide to begin using new technologies, we may not be able to develop products for the new technologies in a timely manner. Our OEM customers may also select competing products despite our ability to develop products incorporating new technologies. For Example, with the shift towards running applications in the Cloud we anticipate that the demand will grow for add-on adapters and products which address the challenges presented by the Cloud, such as power, heat and space limitations in such environments which increase the need for essential building blocks in generic servers, which can be potentially served by our products. However there is no assurance that our OEM customers will buy such products from us or that we will continue to generate significant sales in this area or other areas in which we operate. Consequently, we may suffer from reduced sales to such OEMs and accumulate unusable inventory which can be used only with older technologies. We intend to continue investing in product and technology development. Although we have recorded growing sales of our line of products (to which the majority of our revenues are attributable), there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in the marketing of our current products and in developing, manufacturing and marketing enhanced and new products in a timely manner.
The market for cloud-based and cloud-focused solutions is at a relatively early stage of development, and if it develops in ways that are different from what we anticipate or expect, our business could be harmed.
The market for cloud-based solutions is at an early stage relative to physical appliances and on-premise networking solutions, and these types of deployments may not achieve or sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance, or may end up being implemented differently than current expectations in the market place.
In view of an anticipated increase in Cloud-based data centers utilizing virtualization and SDN, the systems are expected to be increasingly based on generic server platforms. These platforms will all need offload capabilities in order to address the performance challenges realized due to the huge amount of traffic, the high volume of data, the need to encrypt such data, the need to run in virtualized environment, which by itself is a challenge for the server CPU, and the need to include switching within the server for high efficiency SDN. We anticipate that consequently the demand for add-on adapters which address these challenges will grow. Power, heat and space limitations in such environments increase the need for hardware accelerators. Such systems will require essential building blocks in their own generic severs, which can be served by our products.
12

While we believe that we address the above needs with a comprehensive suite of products, many factors may affect the market acceptance of cloud-based and cloud-focused solutions, and/or the acceptance of add-on products incorporated into such solutions. Some of these factors include the possibility of seeing a reduction in the number of physical servers and appliances required by the providers of cloud based or virtualized solutions, or the evolving of different architecture designs which provide for functionality our products offer without the need for add on adapters.
If significant organizations providing Cloud based solutions or other virtualized networks do not perceive the benefits of our cloud-focused and virtualized network based solutions, or if our competitors or new market entrants are able to develop solutions for this sector that do not require add on products such as ours, or offer features that are, or are perceived to be, more effective than ours, this trend of moving towards the cloud but without needing our products for use in such virtualization environments would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The market for our products is highly competitive and some of our competitors may be better positioned than we are.
The market for our products is highly competitive. We face competition from numerous companies, some of which are more established, benefit from greater market recognition and have greater financial, production and marketing resources than we do. For example, in the network interface cards for which we have developed our Server Adapters, our main competitor is Intel, which may offer solutions competing with our developed products. In addition, Caswell, Lanner and Napatech are the main competitors of some of our Smart Cards products. There may be other solutions which might also compete with our other products. We cannot guarantee that our present or contemplated products will continue to be distinguishable from those of our competitors or that the marketplace will find our products preferable to those of our competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that competitive pressures will not result in price reductions that could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition and the results of our operations. For more information regarding our competitors see "Item 4B. – Information on the Company – Business Overview – Competition".
13

We may need to invest significantly in research and development and business development in order to diversify our product offering and enter new markets.
Most of our revenues are generated from the sale of our networking and data infrastructure solution products. The technology industry in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. While these changes could lead to a reduction in the demand for our existing products, they could also create an opportunity for us to expand our product offering to our existing customers and to new customers. Accordingly, our future success may depend on our ability to diversify our product offering and enter new markets, which could involve numerous risks, including:

| · | Substantial research and development and business development expenditures, which could divert funds from other corporate uses and/or have a significant negative effect on our short-term results;

| · | Diversion of management’s attention from our core business; and

| · | Entering markets in which we have little or no experience.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully complete the development and market introduction of new products and no assurance that we will be able to successfully enter new markets. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may experience difficulty in developing new, commercially successful products at acceptable release times.
We conduct extensive research, development and engineering activities. Our efforts emphasize the development of new products, cost reduction of current products, and the enhancement of existing products, generally in response to rapidly changing customer preferences, technologies and industry standards. We cannot guarantee the continued success of our latest lines of products, which include Bypass Switches, Intelligent Bypass Switches, the SETAC product family, the CPE/Edge/Appliance Units and Low End Appliances, nor that they will continue to be widely accepted by the marketplace or that any of our ongoing development efforts will result in other commercially successful products, that such products will be released in a timely manner or that we will be able to respond effectively to technological changes or new product announcements by others.
Significant growth in markets demanding functionality similar to the functionality offered by certain of our products may cause manufacturers to integrate such characteristics into server motherboards or increase the market share of appliances that already have such functionality in-built, eliminating the need for our add-on products.
A significant portion of our products sold are add-on adapters that are added to existing servers in order to improve their functionality. If demand for improved functionality similar to the functionality of our add-on adapters increases significantly, server manufacturers may begin incorporating such functionality as a part of the basic design of their servers, thereby eliminating the need to achieve such functionality through add-on adapters. Furthermore, the market share of special purpose appliances that already have such functionality built-in may increase, consequently reducing the market share of solutions based on servers with add-on adapters. We cannot assure you that such a trend will not occur in connection with our add-on adapters or any of our other products. Such a trend would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
14

Our OEM customers may replace the appliances they currently use with appliances that do not require our cards or incorporate cards other than ours.
Many of the OEMs that use appliances which include our cards do so for a few years, and then consider migration to newer generations of appliances. We cannot guarantee that our cards will be needed or selected for such new appliances or compatible with them. A decision by a current OEM customer or customers to select a new appliance without including our cards in such new appliance may have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may experience difficulty in developing solutions for appliances with proprietary interfaces which may be used by some of our potential customers.
The market for networking appliances includes appliances that make use of proprietary interfaces. These appliances are offered to our potential customers in addition to the customary server-based appliances which use standard interfaces. Our potential customers may decide to use appliances with proprietary interfaces instead of the customary server-based appliances for which several manufacturers may provide add-on cards. There could be no assurance that we would be able to develop non-standard add-on cards for appliances with proprietary interfaces or, if we are successful in developing such cards, that manufacturers of the proprietary interfaces or the customers electing to use these interfaces will make use of our cards in such non-standard environments.
Our ability to accurately forecast future sales is severely limited due to the short lead time of customer orders.
As a result of the short lead time for firm purchase orders, we are unable to accurately forecast future revenues from product sales. As a result, even dramatic fluctuation in revenue (whether increase or decrease) might not be detected until the very end of a financial quarter, which may not enable us to monitor costs in a timely manner to compensate for such fluctuation.
The short lead time of customer orders combined with the long lead time of our suppliers when ordering certain components for our products could result in either a surplus or lack of sufficient supplies, and impact negatively on our finances.
While we are generally required to fill orders for our products within one or two weeks following the receipt of a firm purchase order, we must place orders of certain components for our products between sixteen and twenty weeks prior to delivery. As a result, we must have a significant amount of components in our inventory to be able to meet our best forecasts of projected purchase orders as opposed to on the basis of firm purchase orders. In the event that firm purchase orders are significantly lower than such forecasts, a significant part of our inventory will not be used and we may be unable to adjust costs in a timely manner to compensate for revenue shortfalls and in the event that firm purchase orders exceed such forecasts, we will not be able to fill such purchase orders which may lead to the loss of business from a customer.
15

The loss of a significant customer may have a material adverse effect on us.
We depend on a small amount of customers for our products. Our top three customers accounted for approximately 35% of our revenues in 2015 (out of which our top customer accounted for approximately 20% of our revenues in 2015). We expect that a small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Loss or cancellation of business from, significant changes in deliveries to, or decreases in the prices of products sold to, one or more of our key customers has, in the past, significantly reduced our revenues for a reporting period and could, in the future, harm our margins, financial condition and business.
The loss or ineffectiveness of any of our original equipment manufacturer relationships or a reduction of purchase orders or sales efforts by such original equipment manufacturers may have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.
Our sales and marketing strategy is to develop and maintain strategic relationships with leading original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") in the servers industry and server-based systems industry, which integrate our products into their systems. These OEMs are not within our control, are not obligated to purchase our products, and may select other products that may compete with our lines of products. A reduction in their sales efforts or discontinuance of sales of our products by our OEMs could lead to reduced sales and could materially adversely affect our operating results. Use of OEMs also entails the risk that they will build up inventories in anticipation of a growth in sales. If such growth does not occur as anticipated, such OEMs may substantially decrease the amount of products ordered in subsequent quarters or discontinue product orders. The termination or loss of either one of our key OEM relationships or several OEM relationships at approximately the same time, without being able to compensate this loss with sales to other OEM customers might have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.
We are dependent on key personnel.
Our success has been, and will be, dependent to a large degree on our ability to retain the services of key personnel and to attract additional qualified personnel in the future. Competition for such personnel is intense. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract, assimilate or retain key personnel in the future and our failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to prevent others from claiming that we have infringed their proprietary rights.
We cannot guarantee that one or more parties will not assert infringement claims against us. The cost of responding to claims could be significant, regardless of whether the claims have merit. Significant and protracted litigation may be necessary to determine the scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement, regardless of whether the claims have merit. Although we believe that all our products use only our intellectual property, or intellectual property which is properly licensed to us, in the event that any infringement claim is brought against us and infringement is proven, we could be required to discontinue the use of the relevant technology, to cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, to incur significant litigation damages, costs and expenses, to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain licenses to the alleged infringing technology and to pay royalties to use such licenses. There can be no assurance that we would be able to develop any such alternative technologies or obtain any such licenses on terms commercially acceptable to us.
16

On March 2, 2012 Internet Machines LLC, a Texas limited liability company filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Court”) against numerous defendants (including many switch manufacturers) with respect to certain patents for switches, and included our US subsidiary amongst the list of defendants named in such lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that the defendants have infringed certain patents purported to be owned by Internet Machines LLC and seeks unspecified compensation for damages as well as injunctive relief. The defendants filed answers and counterclaims to the complaint asserting that they do not infringe any claims of the asserted patents and the claims of the patents are invalid and/or unenforceable. On April 28, 2015, the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice by the Court.
Although in the past we have resolved a claim of infringement through a license agreement, the terms of which did not have a material effect on our business, any infringement claim or other litigation against us, could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. While there are no other lawsuits or other claims currently pending against us or our subsidiaries regarding the infringement of patents or intellectual property rights of others, except for any such claims or legal proceedings that, if adversely determined, would not adversely affect the use or exploitation of such intellectual property right by the Company or by (i) any of our subsidiaries; (ii) our recently acquired assets from ADI Engineering, Inc.; or (iii) the creation, development, manufacturing, marketing, provision, distribution, licensing, or sale of any product or service created, developed, manufactured or otherwise provided by any of the Company, any or our subsidiaries or in relation to the assets recently acquired by us from ADI under the assets purchase agreement dated October 28, 2015, we have been a party to such claims in the past and may be party to such claims in the future.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual proprietary rights.
Our success, ability to compete, and future revenue growth are dependent and will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. It is possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies and processes. Any of our existing, acquired, or future patents or other rights to our intellectual property may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. If our intellectual property rights do not adequately protect our technology, our competitors may be able to offer products similar to ours.
In order to establish and protect the technology we use in our products, we primarily rely on a combination of non-disclosure agreements and technical measures, and to a lesser degree on patents. We enter into confidentiality arrangements with our employees, key consultants and other third parties with whom we conduct business. In addition, our employees and key consultants involved in the development of our technologies are required to sign non-compete and invention assignment agreements. We also control access to and distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these efforts, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products, services or technology without our authorization.
17

Despite perceived exclusive access to any intellectual property rights obtained via acquisition, and our best efforts during any such acquisition process to secure such rights, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products, services or technology without our authorization, or others may assert infringement claims against us with respect to a product of ours which utilizes such acquired intellectual property rights.
We believe that the measures we take afford only limited protection, and accordingly, there can be no assurance that the steps we take will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology or the independent development of similar technologies by others. The process of seeking patent protection may take a long time and be expensive. We cannot assure you that patents will be issued from pending or future applications or that, if patents are issued, they will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted under the patents will provide us with meaningful protection or any commercial advantage. In addition, we cannot assure you that other countries in which we market our services and products will protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States. Effective intellectual property enforcement may be unavailable or limited in some countries. It may be difficult for us to protect our intellectual property from misuse or infringement by other companies in these countries. Our inability to enforce our intellectual property rights in some countries may harm our business and results of operations. Litigation, which could result in substantial costs to us and diversion of our resources, may also be necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights.
Further, we cannot assure you that we will at all times enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or that courts will uphold our intellectual property rights, or enforce the contractual arrangements that we have entered into to protect our proprietary technology, which could reduce our opportunities to generate revenues. Our confidentiality and non-competition agreements may not be enforceable and our proprietary technology may not remain a secret. Others may develop similar technology and use this technology to compete with us. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, former employees and other unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.
Loss of our sources for certain key components could harm our operations.
Although we generally use standard parts and components for our products, certain key components used in our products are currently available from only one source, and others are available from a limited number of sources, on which we depend. Nevertheless, we believe that we maintain a sufficient inventory of these components to protect against delays in deliveries. However, we cannot guarantee that we will not experience delays in the supply of critical components in the future or that we will have a sufficient inventory of critical components at such time to produce products at full capacity. For example, a key component in many of our cards is manufactured by Intel, one of our competitors. While we have not encountered difficulties in purchasing such components from Intel's distributors, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to purchase such components without delays or at reasonable prices. In the event that we are not able to purchase key components of our products from our limited sources, or are able to purchase these key components only under unreasonable terms, we may need to redesign certain products. We cannot guarantee that we will have adequate resources for such a redesign or that such a redesign will be successful. Such inability to obtain alternative resources or to successfully redesign our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
18

Inability to receive information from our key component manufacturers could affect our ability to develop new products required by our OEM customers and by the industry in which we operate.
Our products are based on networking controllers which are manufactured by eitherBroadcom, Cavium or Intel. In order to design our products, we need to receive information that enables us to design products with the use of such controllers. There can be no assurance that we will continue to receive all the information required for designing products with the use of new controllers continuously released by the above mentioned companies. Intel and Cavium are our competitors and Broadcom may also compete with our products. Such competition may also affect their decisions regarding the sharing of information with us. The inability to obtain such information may adversely affect our ability to develop new products required by our OEM customers and by the industry in which we operate.
Our networking and data infrastructure solution products which are sold by us mainly to OEMs, are characterized by long sales cycles.
We sell our networking and data infrastructure solution products mainly to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. The decision making process of our OEM customers includes several time consuming processes, resulting from the critical importance of our products in their systems. They need to define the required configuration of their server system/appliance, derive the need and type of adapters or other add-on products, evaluate our products, intensively test and qualify our products and then (or in parallel) negotiate the terms for a purchase. It may therefore take 12 months or more from the time we first contact a prospective customer before such customer implements our cards in its system constituting what is known as a Design Win. Additionally, once a Design Win for one of our products is secured, our sales of these products typically involve significant capital investment decisions by prospective end customers, as well as a significant amount of time to educate such end customers as to the benefits of systems and appliances that include our products. As a result, before purchasing systems and appliances which include our products (and consequently facilitating sales of our products), companies spend a substantial amount of time performing internal reviews and obtaining capital expenditure approvals, consequently lengthening the period of time required for a Design Win to mature into consistent sales. These long sales cycles make it difficult to predict when and to what extent discussions with potential customers will materialize into sales and could cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate widely from period to period. In addition, our allocation of significant resources to potential sales opportunities that do not materialize into sales could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
19

We may make acquisitions or pursue mergers that could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.
As part of our business strategy, we have sought and may continue to seek to invest in or acquire other businesses, technologies or assets, and we may enter into joint ventures or other strategic relationships with third parties.
We may assume liabilities, incur amortization expenses related to intangible assets or realize large and immediate write-offs in connection with future acquisitions. In addition, the future valuation of these acquisitions may decrease from the market price paid by us, which may result in the writing-off, or impairment, of the relevant assets. In addition, our operation of any acquired or merged businesses, technologies or assets could involve numerous risks, including:

| · | Post-merger integration problems resulting from the combination of any acquired operations with our own operations or from the combination of two or more operations into a new merged entity;

| · | Diversion of management’s attention from our core business;

| · | Substantial expenditures, which could divert funds from other corporate uses;

| · | Entering markets in which we have little or no experience; and

| · | Loss of key employees of the acquired operations.

We cannot be certain that any acquisition or merger will be successful. If the operation of the business of any acquisition or merger disrupts our operations, our business may suffer. In addition, even if we successfully integrate the acquired business with our own, we may not receive the intended benefits of the acquisition.
We may be subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and customer initiatives relating to the environment, conflict minerals or other social responsibility issues, which may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act included disclosure requirements regarding the use of "conflict" minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries (“DRC”) and procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to prevent the sourcing of such "conflict" minerals. These requirements will require companies to diligence, disclose and report whether or not such “conflict” minerals originate from the DRC. The implementation of these requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals such as cassiterite, wolframite, coltan, and gold which are used in the manufacture of certain components used in our products. As a result, this could limit the pool of suppliers who can provide us DRC "conflict free" components and parts, and we may not be able to obtain DRC "conflict free" products or supplies in sufficient quantities for our operations. Also, because our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our customers, shareholders and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for the minerals used in our products. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict mineral free. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals and metals used in our products. For additional information see "Item 4 Information on the Company – Business Overview."
20

Risks Relating to Operations in Israel and Internationally
The tax benefits available to us under Israeli law require us to meet several conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which would increase our taxes.
Our production facilities have been granted "Approved Enterprise" or "Benefited Enterprise" status in past years and currently hold a "Preferred Enterprise" status and since and as such, we are entitled to certain tax benefits. To be eligible for these tax benefits, we must meet certain conditions. If we fail to meet these conditions in the future, the tax benefits could be reduced or canceled and we could be required to refund any tax benefits we might already have received. These tax benefits may not be continued in the future at their current levels, or at any level. In recent years, the Israeli government has reduced the benefits available and has indicated that it may further reduce or eliminate some of these benefits in the future. The termination or reduction of these benefits may increase our income tax expense in the future. To the best of our knowledge, to date we have met the conditions for benefits under each of our "Approved Enterprise" and "Benefited Enterprise" plans and under our "Preferred Enterprise" status in all material respects. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to meet such conditions in the future. If these tax benefits are reduced, cancelled or discontinued, our Israeli taxable income would be subject to regular Israeli corporate tax rates. The standard corporate tax rate for Israeli companies in 2013 was 25.0%, was increased to 26.5% for 2014 and 2015 and reduced to 25% in 2016 and thereafter. See Item 10 "Additional Information – Taxation – Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959" for more information about our "Benefited Enterprise" status.
The recent Amendment Number 7 to the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 1984 may cause ambiguity regarding its implementation and have an adverse effect on the Company
On July 29, 2015, the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, enacted Amendment Number 7 to the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development Law, 1984 (the "R&D Law" and the "R&D Amendment", respectively). The R&D Amendment, effective as of January 1, 2016 amends material provisions of the R&D Law, such as royalty rates, changes to royalty rates upon transfer of manufacturing rights abroad etc., leaves substantial discretion with a new authority which shall be established to replace the current Office of the Chief Scientist of Israel (the "OCS") and includes only guidelines to some of the core issues of the R&A Law, thus currently causing much ambiguity as to the implementation of the R&D Amendment and its effect on companies which developed know-how using funds received from the OCS. In addition, it is still not clear if the R&D Amendment will have a retroactive effect, which may change the terms of grants previously received from the OCS.
21

The political environment and hostilities in Israel could harm our business.
Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a state of hostility has existed between Israel and the Arab countries in the region. This state of hostility has varied in degree and intensity over time. There has also been conflict and unrest between Israel, the Palestinian Authority and certain terrorist groups operating within the Palestinian Authority and Lebanon. In addition, internal conflicts within neighboring counties such as Egypt and Syria also affect Israel, both directly and indirectly. A significant increase in violence began in September 2000 and has continued with varying levels of severity through 2013, such as Israel’s war with the Hezbollah militant group in July and August of 2006. In December 2008 and January 2009 there was an escalation in violence among Israel, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority and other groups, as well as extensive hostilities along Israel’s border with the Gaza Strip, which resulted in missiles being fired from the Gaza Strip into Southern Israel. Similar hostilities accompanied by missiles being fired from the Gaza Strip into Southern Israel, as well at areas more centrally located near Tel Aviv and at areas surrounding Jerusalem, occurred during November 2012. During the summer of 2014, another escalation in violence among Israel, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority and other groups took place. This escalation became known as "Operation Protective Edge", which resulted in missiles being fired from the Gaza Strip into Southern and Central Israel, as well as civil insurrection of Palestinians in the West Bank. In October 2015, Israel encountered another escalation in violence with the Palestinian population, which resulted in clashes between Israel and armed Palestinians on the border with Gaza, in the West Bank and in Israeli cities. Since February 2011, Egypt has experienced political turbulence and an increase in terrorist activity in the Sinai Peninsula, following the resignation of Hosni Mubarak as president. This included protests throughout Egypt, and the appointment of a military regime in his stead, followed by the elections to parliament which brought groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood (which had been previously outlawed by Egypt), and the subsequent overthrow of this elected government by a military regime instead. Such political turbulence and violence may damage peaceful and diplomatic relations between Israel and Egypt, and could affect the region as a whole. Similar civil unrest and political turbulence has occurred in other countries in the region, including Syria which shares a common border with Israel, and is affecting the political stability of those countries. Since April 2011, internal conflict in Syria has escalated, and evidence indicates that chemical weapons have been used in the region. Intervention may be contemplated by outside parties in order to prevent further chemical weapon use. This instability and any intervention may lead to deterioration of the political and economic relationships that exist between the State of Israel and some of these countries, and may have the potential for additional conflicts in the region. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also believed to have a strong influence among extremist groups in the region, such as Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iran is known to support the government of Syria in its battles against various rebel militia groups in Syria. Furthermore, 2014 saw the rise of an Islamic fundamentalist group, known as ISIS. Following swift conquering operations, ISIS gained control of vast areas in the Middle East, including in Iraq and Syria, which contributed to the turmoil experienced in these areas. As a result, the United States armed forces have engaged in limited operations to eradicate ISIS and recently, Russia's armed forces have also engaged in limited operations to defeat ISIS and other rebel groups operating in Syria. These situations may potentially escalate in the future to more violent events which may affect Israel and us. Furthermore, several countries still restrict trade with Israeli companies and additional countries may impose such restrictions as a result of changes in the military and/or political conditions in Israel and/or the surrounding countries, which may limit our ability to make sales in, or purchase components from, those countries. Any future armed conflict, political instability, continued violence in the region or restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. While such hostilities did not in the past have a material adverse impact on our business, we cannot guarantee that hostilities will not be renewed and have such an effect in the future. The political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have contracts claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital or obtain components used in our products. Since many of our facilities are located in Israel, we could experience serious disruptions if acts associated with this conflict result in any serious damage to our facilities. Any insurance coverage we may have may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur and any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any future armed conflict or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and harm our results of operations.
22

Many of our employees in Israel are required to perform military reserve duty.
All non-exempt male adult citizens and permanent residents of Israel under the age of 40, or older for reserves officers or citizens with certain occupations, as well as certain female adult citizens and permanent residents of Israel, are obligated to perform military reserve duty and may be called to active duty under emergency circumstances. In recent years, there have been significant call-ups of military reservists, and it is possible that there will be additional call-ups in the future. While we have operated effectively despite these conditions in the past, we cannot assess what impact these conditions may have in the future, particularly if emergency circumstances arise. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more of our executive officers or key employees or a significant number of our other employees due to military service. Any disruption in our operations would harm our business.
Exchange rate fluctuations and international risks could increase the cost of our operations.
Approximately 97% of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and may be subject to government controls and other risks, including, in some cases, export licenses, federal restrictions on export, currency fluctuations, political instability, trade restrictions, and changes in tariffs and freight rates. Our U.S. dollar costs in Israel and Denmark will increase further to the extent that inflation in Israel and Denmark exceeds the devaluation of the NIS and Danish Krone ("DKK"), respectively, against the dollar, if the timing of such devaluation lags behind inflation in Israel or Denmark, or if the dollar devalues against the NIS or DKK.
23

We are affected by worldwide downturns in industries based on technology.
The volatility in the securities markets discussed above and its effect on high-technology companies may have a ripple effect on our performance. In the downturn which the markets experienced beginning in 2001, technology companies dealing in communications and computers were severely affected and some were forced to cease operations. We felt the effects of this downturn in 2001 through 2003. We were also affected by the downturn in the economic markets which began in 2008, posing a risk to industries based on technology as well as the overall economy. We can give no assurance that our results will not be affected on a going forward basis by any economic downturns.
General economic conditions may adversely affect the Company’s results.
Uncertainty in global economic conditions, including any disruption in financial and credit markets, pose a risk to the overall economy that could impact demand for our and our customers’ products, as well as our ability to manage commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors. If the global economic situation worsens, our business could be negatively impacted, including such areas as reduced demand for our products and services, or supplier or customer disruptions, which could reduce our revenues or our ability to collect our accounts receivable and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to our Ordinary Shares
We are affected by volatility in the securities markets.
The securities markets in general have experienced volatility which has particularly affected the securities of many high-technology companies and particularly those in the fields of communications, software and internet, including companies that have a significant presence in Israel. This volatility has often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies and may cause difficulties in raising additional financing required to effectively operate and develop their businesses. Such difficulties and the volatility of the securities markets in general may affect our financial condition and results.
We may experience a decline in our share price and there is no guarantee that our share price will rise at all.
Our share price fell during recent periods of uncertainty in global economic conditions and we expect it to continue to be affected by such uncertainty to the extent that it continues. We cannot assure you that our share price will stabilize, or not decline, in the coming fiscal year.
We may not be able to fulfill our dividend policy in the future.
We have announced a dividend policy for distributing up to 50% of our annual distributable profits as a dividend. Our Board of Directors declared a dividend for 2012 which was distributed in April 2013, for 2013 which was distributed in April 2014, for 2014 which was distributed in April 2015 and for 2015 which was distributed in April 2016. Our ability to distribute dividends in the future may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this report. As part of the stated dividend policy the Company's Board of Directors reserves the right to declare additional dividend distributions, to change the rate of dividend distributions (either as a policy or on a one-time basis), to cancel a specific distribution or to cancel the policy as a whole at any time, at its sole discretion. Any dividend will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at the time as our board of directors may consider relevant. Our ability to pay cash dividends may be restricted by instruments governing any of our obligations. We are restricted by Israeli law to pay dividends in any fiscal year only out of “profits,” as defined by the Israeli Companies Law, unless otherwise authorized by an Israeli court, and provided that the distribution is not reasonably expected to impair our ability to fulfill our outstanding and expected obligations. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue paying dividends or increase our payment of dividends in the future, nor is there any assurance that our Board of Directors will not change our dividend policy in the future. If we are unable to fulfill our stated dividend policy, or pay dividends at levels anticipated by investors in our shares, the market price of our shares may be negatively affected and the value of our shareholders’ investment may be reduced. See “Item 8.A Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information”, under the caption “8A – Dividend Policy” for additional information regarding the payment of dividends.
24

If we fail to meet continued listing standards of NASDAQ, our shares may be delisted, which could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of our shares
Our ordinary shares are currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The NASDAQ has requirements that a company must meet in order to remain listed on NASDAQ. In particular, NASDAQ rules require us to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share of our ordinary shares. If the closing bid price of our common stock were to fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days or we do not meet other listing requirements, we would fail to be in compliance with NASDAQ’s listing standards. There can be no assurance that we will continue to meet the minimum bid price requirement, or any other requirement in the future. If we fail to meet the minimum bid price requirement, The NASDAQ Stock Market may initiate the delisting process with a notification letter. If we were to receive such a notification, we would be afforded a grace period of 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. In order to regain compliance, our ordinary shares would need to maintain a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days. If our ordinary shares were to be delisted, our liquidity would be adversely affected and our market price could decrease.
The trading volume of our shares has been low in the past and may be low in the future, resulting in lower than expected market prices for our shares.
Our shares have been traded at low volumes in the past and may be traded at low volumes in the future for reasons related or unrelated to our performance. This low trading volume may result in lower than expected market prices for our ordinary shares and our shareholders may not be able to resell their shares for more than they paid for them.
25

Israeli courts might not enforce judgments rendered outside of Israel.
We are incorporated in Israel. All of our executive officers and all of our directors are non-residents of the United States, and a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult to enforce a judgment obtained in the United States against us or any such persons. It may also be difficult to enforce civil liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws in original actions instituted in Israel. However, subject to certain time limitations, Israeli courts may enforce U.S. final executory judgments for liquidated amounts in civil matters obtained after due trial before a court of competent jurisdiction (according to the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel) which enforces similar Israeli judgments, provided that the requisite procedural and legal requirements are adhered to. If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court, it generally will be payable in NIS, which can then be converted into foreign currency at the rate of exchange of such foreign currency on the date of payment. Pending collection, the amount of the judgment of an Israeli court stated in NIS (without any linkage to a foreign currency) ordinarily will be linked to the Israeli consumer price index plus interest at the annual statutory rate prevailing at such time. Judgment creditors bear the risk of unfavorable exchange rates.
If we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences.
We will be a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, if 75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year, including our pro-rata share of the gross income of any company, U.S. or foreign, in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, is passive income. Alternatively, we will be considered to be a PFIC if at least 50% of our assets in a taxable year, averaged over the year and ordinarily determined based on fair market value and including our pro-rata share of the assets of any company in which we are considered to own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the shares by value, are held for the production of, or produce, passive income. If we were to be a PFIC, and a U.S. Holder does not make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund,” or QEF, or a “mark-to-market” election, “excess distributions” to a U.S. Holder, and any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on a disposition or our ordinary shares, would be taxed in an unfavorable way. Among other consequences, our dividends, to the extent that they constituted excess distributions, would be taxed at the regular rates applicable to ordinary income, rather than the 15% maximum rate applicable to certain dividends received by an individual from a qualified foreign corporation, and certain "interest" charges may apply. In addition, gains on the sale of our shares would be treated in the same way as excess distributions. The tests for determining PFIC status are applied annually and it is difficult to make accurate predictions of future income and assets, which are relevant to the determination of PFIC status. In addition, under the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, it is unclear whether we would be permitted to use a gross loss from sales (sales less cost of goods sold) to offset our passive income in the calculation of gross income. As a result of our substantial cash position, if the value of our shares declines, there is a substantial risk that we will be classified as a PFIC under the asset test described above. There can be no assurance that we will not be classified as a PFIC by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. In light of the uncertainties described above, no assurance can be given that we will not be a PFIC in any year. A U.S. Holder who makes a QEF election is taxed currently on such holder's proportionate share of our earnings. If the IRS determines that we are a PFIC for a year with respect to which we have determined that we were not a PFIC, however, it might be too late for a U.S. Holder to make a timely QEF election, unless the U.S. Holder qualifies under the applicable Treasury regulations to make a retroactive (late) election. U.S. Holders who hold ordinary shares during a period when we are a PFIC will be subject to the foregoing rules, even if we cease to be a PFIC, subject to exceptions for U.S. Holders who made a timely QEF or mark-to-market election, or certain other elections. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a Qualified Election Fund election. Accordingly, our shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of PFIC rules.
26

Our investment portfolio may be impaired by disruptions in the financial and credit markets.
Our investment portfolio currently consists of corporate debt securities which the Company classified at December 31, 2015 as "held-to-maturity". As of December 31, 2015, we hold approximately US$ 32.9 million in corporate debt securities.
Due to possible significant disruptions in the financial and credit markets, the corporate debt securities in our portfolio are subject to a possible increased risk of default due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other factors affecting the issuers of those securities. In addition, securities in our portfolio are subject to other risks, such as credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks, which may be exacerbated by market disruptions, and which may impair the assets. We may be required to adjust the carrying value of our investment securities due to a default, lack of liquidity or other event, if the event constitutes an impairment which is considered to be other-than-temporary. As of December 31, 2015, we were not required to adjust the carrying value of our investment securities since there were no other-than-temporary impairments.
This loss would be recorded in our consolidated statement of operations which could materially adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY.
A. History and Development of the Company
Our legal and commercial name is Silicom Ltd. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel in 1987, and we operate under Israeli law and legislation. Our registered and principal executive offices are located in Israel at 14 Atir Yeda Street, Kfar Sava, Israel 4464323, and our telephone number is +972-(0)9-764-4555.
Our shares have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market since January 2, 2014 under the ticker symbol “SILC”. Prior thereto our shares were listed on the NASDAQ Global Market (previously known as the NASDAQ National Market) under the ticker symbol “SILC” (and previously “SILCF”) from February 11, 2008. Prior thereto, our shares were listed on the NASDAQ Capital Mark.et (previously known as the NASDAQ Small-Cap). On December 20, 2005, we obtained the approval of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, for the listing of our shares on TASE. Trading of our shares on TASE commenced on December 27, 2005. On October 26, 2015, our Board of Directors resolved to act to delist the Company’s shares from trading on the TASE. Consequently, we applied to the TASE and requested that TASE initiate the delisting process. On October 29, 2015, the TASE announced to the TASE members on the TASE electronic filing site, the MAYA, and on the ISA electronic filing site, the MAGNA, that the last trading day in the Company's shares on the TASE shall be January 26, 2016 and that on January 28, 2016, the Company's shares shall be delisted from trading on the TASE. Accordingly, the last trading day in our shares on the TASE was January 26, 2016, and on January 28, 2016, our shares were delisted from trading on the TASE. Our shares are currently listed only on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. See Item 9. “The Offer and Listing - Markets and Share Price History”.
27

In March 2014, we filed a "shelf" registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. We may sell up to $80,000,000 of our ordinary shares in one or more offerings pursuant to this registration statement.
In December 2014, we entered into a share purchase agreement with Fiberblaze, a provider of high performance application acceleration solutions for the mobile, telecommunication, network monitoring, cyber security, financial and related industries, Nikolaj Herman, Fiberblaze Holding APS, a Danish company, Hilmer APS, a Danish company, and Jakob Hilmer, for the purchase of the entire share capital of Fiberblaze and Fiberblaze US (the "Fiberblaze SPA") in consideration for an amount of approximately $10 million, plus such additional amounts in the event Fiberblaze meets pre-determined criteria. For additional information regarding the Fiberblaze SPA, see "Item 10 – Additional Information – Material Contracts" and Note 3B to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
In September 2015, we, together with our wholly owned subsidiary, Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc., entered into an asset purchase agreement with ADI Engineering, Inc. ("ADI"), a US company which provides Intel-based products targeted at SDN, NFV, IoT ("Internet of Things"), Cloud computing and Virtualization, Steve Yates and Patricia Yates (the "ADI APA") for the purchase of ADI's assets in consideration for an amount equal to $10 million in cash at closing, and an additional consideration subject to the attainment of certain future performance milestones. For additional information regarding the ADI APA, see "Item 10 – Additional Information – Material Contracts" And Note 3A to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Principal capital expenditures and divestitures
From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, our capital expenditures totaled to approximately $20,771 thousand (compared to $16,682 thousand during 2014 and $929 thousand during 2013), of which approximately $1,608 thousand (compared to $1,179 thousand during 2014 and $788 thousand during 2013) can be attributed to machinery and equipment, approximately $1,374 thousand (compared to $659 thousand during 2014 and $141 thousand during 2013) can be attributed to office furniture and equipment and leasehold improvements, and approximately $17,802 thousand can be attributed to the ADI APA. We have financed our capital expenditures from our available internal resources, and expect to continue to finance our capital expenditures in a similar manner in 2016.
28

B. Business Overview
We are currently engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and support of high performance networking and data infrastructure solutions for a broad range of servers, server based systems and communications devices. Our products are sold to OEM customers who offer networking appliances, servers and storage devices. As the market moves to utilize applications within virtualization based Cloud Data Centers, our products are now offered in this market as well.
Products
Our products are comprised of:

| (i) | Server network interface cards with and without bypass (Server Adapters);

| (ii) | Intelligent and programmable cards, with features such as encryption, acceleration, data compression, redirection, time stamping, network capture solutions, FPGA based ultra-low latency solutions, other offload features and/or compute blades (Smart Cards); and

| (iii) | Stand-alone Products (including Bypass Switches, Intelligent Bypass Switches, the patented SETAC (Server To Appliance Converter) product family and the CPE/Edge/Low End Appliance Units.

Server Adapters
We have developed a line of products for the server networking industry which facilitates interaction between servers and switches, allowing them to communicate with each other through a larger number of ports and with higher performance than their original manufacturer designed capabilities. Our designs have resulted in powerful products that allow server-based systems to fully exploit the high speed potential of 1/10/25/40/100 Gigabit Ethernet. The products have either one, two, four, six or eight ports, which plug into the servers which need to have such capabilities.
Following demands from customers and potential customers, we also designed some of these same server adapter products with a bypass feature. Intended for mission-critical environments, Silicom’s Gigabit Ethernet Bypass Networking Cards feature innovative bypass circuitry to maintain continuity of network connectivity in the event of an appliance failure. Upon the occurrence of an appliance failure, the card’s bypass mechanism automatically reroutes traffic to bypass faulty components, enabling customers to have reliable and always available network accessibility. As with all of Silicom’s Multiport Gigabit Ethernet Networking Cards, the Bypass Cards also improve server throughput and performance during normal operations by introducing more ports and better throughput while reducing network congestion, simplifying network management, and minimizing CPU utilization.
29

Smart Cards
Our Smart Card products include server adapters such as: (a) redirector cards, (b) encryption and data compression hardware acceleration cards, (c) time stamping and full FPGA based network capture and mobile OSS distribution solutions, (d) Network processor acceleration cards, (e) VHIO – a product off-loading virtualization switching from the CPU, (f) FPGA based ultra-low latency solutions, and (g) compute blades which offer general compute capability in networking intensive environment.
Our redirector cards improve performance by: (a) enabling traffic filtering in order to reduce the amount of traffic received by the server, limiting it to only essential traffic for the server CPU, and consequently improving server performance, and (b) load-balancing between external servers and/or CPUs and/or CPU cores increasing the efficiency of the server.
Our product line of high-performance encryption cards is designed to improve the throughput of internet security appliances and other networking appliances. The products improve the performance of networking appliances by independently executing encryption tasks, thereby accelerating the encryption process and freeing the CPUs of such appliances for other activities. In 2013 we announced the launch of a new high-performance PCI Express Server encryption and compression card family based on the Intel® Communications Chipset 89xx series. During 2014 we achieved our first design win of our Coleto Creek encryption and compression card, from one of our existing customers, a market-leading provider of smart network solutions, who will use the Coleto Creek and Quad-Port 10G Networking cards in one of its next-generation network appliances, and during 2015 we achieved additional design wins for this solution. This product line can off-load not only encryption functionality, but compression functionality as well. The market need for compression off-load was previously limited to some content delivery and WAN optimization networking appliances; however, such compression off-load is now becoming more and more important in the storage market especially within the Big-Data area, which is the market sector that is the primary target of this functionality.
Our 1G/10G/40G/100G Nano-Second Time-Stamping/Full Capturing adapters, are based either on a combined Intel networking silicon and our proprietary time-stamping FPGA (field programmable gate array), or on a pure FPGA based solution, working at wire speed to time-imprint packets at high resolutions and accuracy, process packet, load balance between packets and provide full capturing solutions in a variety of scenarios. Our PCI-E Network processor based Smart Cards are targeted for server acceleration by providing a packet processing platform which can be used to off-load packet processing applications from the main CPU onto a processor card, and consequently freeing CPU cycles for the main application and improving server performance.
In 2014 we launched a new Cloud Virtualization Off-Loading solution with open stack support – the SmartSilc VHIO 1.0, which is our first product utilizing a Virtualization Off-Load Engine. As a network processor blade incorporated within cloud compute nodes and network nodes, SmartSilc VHIO 1.0 offloads all network and storage I/O tasks from the Hypervisor, significantly reducing CPU utilization and consequently improving the performance of any compute node in which it is installed. In addition, its implementation of NAT, firewall and other tasks previously carried out in the network node frees the network node to become an additional compute node.
30

Our FPGA based ultra-low latency solutions are used for the programming process needed to achieve line-speed data processing with ultra-low latency. These features are required in Network Monitoring/Capture/Analysis solutions for telecommunications, Lawful Interception, data centers and the Algorithmic HFT (High Frequency Trading) niche of the financial service market, as well as the emerging mobile OSS/BSS markets.
Our compute blades offer general compute capability in networking intensive environment. These compute blades could be integrated in an appliance, micro server, CPE equipment and alike. In addition, we use our low end compute blades for IoT. The growing IoT market requires compute nodes for an unlimited number of applications. Such compute nodes are required to be low-cost, and we are addressing such need by basing our compute blades mostly on using Intel’s low-end compute silicon and optimizing it for high performance at the low-cost.
Stand-alone Products
Our Stand-alone Products include (i) Bypass Switches and Intelligent Bypass Switches which allow the use of our solutions even where the networking component of the solution is already present, (ii) the patented SETAC product family, a unique solution that enables standard servers to be configured as network appliances with high-density front networking ports and easy port modularity, including Switched SETAC which adds the functionality of a switch to such a solution, (iii) CPE/Edge/Low End Appliance Units, which integrate our compute blades and enable us to offer a stand-alone solution with general compute capability in networking intensive environment to the customer.
We developed stand-alone bypass solutions which allow the use of our solutions even where the networking component of the solution is already present. We market stand-alone bypass units for: (a) entry level bypass switch 1/10Gbps, directed at power failure bypass; and (b) high end 1G/10G/40G/100Gbps Intelligent Bypass Solution which includes switch with self-generating heartbeat and versatile monitoring and control options.
Our SETAC products convert standard servers to network appliances. The SETAC product line includes SETAC converters (comprised of PCI-Express G2 and G3 adapters, cables and Silicom’s backplane), which interface with Silicom’s front loading I/O Express Modules adapters. SETAC products are installed by a simple process of placing Silicom’s I/O Express Modules adapters into a server’s hard drive slots. This combination enables standard servers to be configured as network appliances with server-grade reliability, front-end access, field replaceable architecture and a stable technology environment, thus creating a complete network appliance platform solution that provides us with a competitive edge. To the best of our knowledge we are currently the only company offering such a unique solution in the hardware networking appliance industry.
31

In December 2014, we announced the achievement of our first design win of our Switched SETAC solution, a new cloud platform designated to save space, energy and costs in cloud and data center services by integrating x86 standard motherboards, switching capability utilizing commercial off-the-shelf switching silicon, our Redirector features and potential support for SDN/NFV protocols from a provider of cloud based cyber security and application delivery solutions. Pursuant to this announcement, we announced in December 2014 the achievement of another design win of our Switched SETAC (the accelerated version), from a European provider of PDI solutions. This unique product adds Network Processor acceleration to the many additional features and benefits of the Switched SETAC, by allowing applications to be offloaded from the main CPU to the Network Processor modules, thus resulting in high performance while maintaining all Switched SETAC capabilities. During 2015 we announced an additional design win achievement of our Switched SETAC solution.
In addition, we are now offering to the market full computing platforms in a networking intensive environment. Such platforms are based on compute blades, integrating such blades into a full CPE/EDGE/Appliance Units. Such units offer a stand-alone solution with general compute capability in networking intensive environment. These units are also offered as CPE or edge equipment required as a part of a Cloud solution and also as low-end branch office appliances carrying mostly networking applications.
We cannot assure that any of our products will be commercially successful, that our development efforts will result in commercially successful products, that such products will be released in a timely manner or that we will be able to respond effectively to technological changes or new product announcements by our competitors.
We cannot assure you that revenue generated from our current suite of products and solutions will reach or exceed historical levels in any future period. A decrease in the price of, or demand for, any of these products or solutions, or a significant increase in our costs of manufacturing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Principal Markets
The principal markets in which we compete are set forth more particularly in, and are incorporated by reference to Note 12A to the consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 18 of this annual report. In 2013, 2014 and 2015 approximately 76%, 71% and 66% respectively, were in North America 13%, 15% and 20% respectively, of our sales were in Europe, and 11%, 14% and 14% respectively, were in Asia-Pacific. Our main business is not seasonal, and we believe that there are sufficient sources and raw materials available to sustain it.
Manufacturing and Suppliers
Our manufacturing operations consist primarily of producing finished goods from (i) components purchased from third parties, (ii) sub-assemblies manufactured by sub-contractors, and (iii) turnkey manufacturers. In addition, we perform testing and quality assurance procedures with respect to the components and sub-assemblies which are incorporated into our final products and the final products themselves.
32

We seek to monitor quality with respect to each stage of the production process including, but not limited to, the selection of component suppliers, warehouse procedures and final testing, packaging and shipping. We have been certified as complying with "ISO 9001:2008" and "ISO 14001:2004", which are the quality control standard used in our industry. We believe that our quality assurance procedures have been instrumental in achieving a high degree of reliability for our products. We intend to continue to maintain and improve the efficiency of such procedures.
Although we generally use standard parts and components for our products, certain key components used in our products are currently available from only one source, and others are available from a limited number of sources. Components currently available from one source include proprietary Gigabit Ethernet chipsets and other components, including other semiconductor devices and transformers, as well as plastic and metal product housings. We believe that we maintain a sufficient inventory of these components to protect against delays in deliveries. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act included disclosure requirements regarding the use of "conflict" minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries (“DRC”) and procedures regarding a manufacturer's efforts to prevent the sourcing of such "conflict" minerals. These requirements will require companies to diligence, disclose and report whether or not such “conflict” minerals originate from the DRC. This implementation of these requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals such as cassiterite, wolframite, coltan, gold and their derivatives (tantalum, tin, and tungsten) which are used in the manufacture of certain components used in our products, as well as affect the companies we use to manufacture components of our products. As a result, this could limit the pool of suppliers who can provide us DRC "conflict free" components and parts, and we may not be able to obtain DRC "conflict free" products or supplies in sufficient quantities for our operations. In circumstances where conflict minerals in our products are found to be sourced from the DRC, we may take actions to change materials or designs to reduce the possibility that our purchase of conflict minerals may fund armed groups in the region. These actions could add engineering and other costs to the manufacture of our products, and we may not be able to obtain "conflict free" products or supplies in sufficient quantities for our operations. In addition, we incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals and metals used in our products, as further elaborated below. Also, because our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our customers, shareholders and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for the minerals used in our products. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict mineral free. There can be no assurance that we will not experience delays in the supply of critical components in the future or that we will have a sufficient inventory of critical components at such time to produce products at full capacity. If we do experience such delays and there is an insufficient inventory of critical components at that time, our operations and financial results would be adversely affected.
33

In June 2014 and May 2015, we issued our Specialized Disclosure Report for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, respectively, in compliance with Rule 13p-1 under the Exchange Act, according to which, some conflict minerals (gold, tantalum, tin, and tungsten) are necessary to the functionality or production of certain of our products. Conflict minerals are obtained, via our direct suppliers, from sources worldwide, and our desire is not to eliminate those originating in the DRC and adjourning countries but rather to obtain conflict minerals from sources that do not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the DRC and adjourning countries.
We have also adopted a policy with respect to the sourcing of conflict minerals, according to which as part of our commitment to corporate responsibility and respecting human rights in our own operations and in our global supply chain, it is our goal to seek to use tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold in our products that are "DRC conflict free", while continuing to support responsible in-region mineral sourcing from the DRC and adjoining countries.
Furthermore, since the origin of conflict minerals cannot be determined with any certainty once the ores are smelted, refined and converted to ingots, bullion or other conflict minerals containing derivatives, we rely on our direct suppliers to assist with our reasonable country of origin inquiry and due diligence efforts, including the identification of smelters and refiners, for the conflict minerals contained in the materials which they supply to us.
Based on our reasonable country of origin inquiry and due diligence process, we concluded that during 2013 and 2014 (i) we manufactured and contracted to manufacture products as to which conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of our products and (ii) as a result of the reasonable country of origin inquiry and due diligence measures, we determined that our products to which conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of our products are “DRC Conflict Undeterminable” (as defined in Rule 13p-1 under the Exchange Act). We made this determination due to insufficient information provided by some of its active suppliers and manufacturers who supplied it with some of the necessary conflict minerals, which originated in the DRC and adjoining countries, but who were unable to indicate whether such necessary conflict minerals were from recycle or scrap sources, were DRC conflict free or were not found to be DRC conflict free.
Firm purchase orders for our products generally include an agreed supply date for the supply of our products. In addition, we may agree to fill orders for our products within short periods of time after receipt of a firm purchase order based on the immediate availability of our products and/or components in our inventory. Consequently, we need to maintain inventory at levels that are in accordance with our forecasts and those of our customers. There can be no assurance that such forecasts will indeed materialize into firm purchase orders and consequently we cannot guarantee that the full volume of such inventory will be delivered against firm purchase orders and not remain unused.
34

Marketing Channels
The principal market sectors for our products are:

| (i) | Network appliances, including WAN Optimization, Internet Security, Cyber Security, Application Delivery, Traffic Management, Network Monitoring and Analytics, High Frequency Trading (HFT) for the financial service market and other mission-critical sectors;

| (ii) | Servers;

| (iii) | Data storage including Big Data;

| (iv) | The “Cloud” (virtualized data centers with and without SDN); and

| (v) | Network CPE/EDGE/Low End appliances; and

| (vi) | IOT.

Our main business model for our line of products is called the Design Win Model. The following are the main aspects of this model:

| · | We approach a potential customer or are approached by such customer.

| · | If the customer shows interest in the products and we believe that achievement of a business relationship with the customer is possible, we ship products for such customer’s evaluation.

| · | During the evaluation process the customer receives a few units of the relevant product for initial basic testing. If the evaluation process is successful, we ship products for qualification.

| · | During the qualification process the customer receives a larger amount of our products for more specific testing, which may include certain adaptations of our products to its specific needs.

| · | If the qualification process is successful, we enter into negotiations regarding the terms of a business relationship.

| · | In some cases, typically with the larger customers, the evaluation and qualification process may take 12 months or more.

Once all phases mentioned above are concluded, the customer will purchase products from us in order to incorporate such products within its server based systems, and then sell such systems with our cards embedded in them. The sale of our products within such systems is the objective of our Design Win Model. In most cases once we secure a Design Win our customer will continue to buy our cards for as long as it continues to sell its server based system.
35

Over the last few years, our sales and marketing has been carried out through a network of strategic relationships with leading original equipment manufacturers which sell our products, generally as a part of their systems and sometimes under their own private labels. Our current original equipment manufacturer customers are mostly active in the Internet Security market, Application Delivery market, Traffic management market, Network Monitoring market, data storage market, general servers market, WAN optimization market and other server based applications. Our customers sell their products, to the Governments, Enterprise (headquarter and branch) and to Data Centers (regular and virtualized, including to the Cloud). They are referred to in this report as OEMs, or OEM customers. Our strategy of carrying out strategic relationships with OEM customers continues to be the strategy under which we operate. We believe that these relationships enable us to take advantage of the superior financial resources and market presence of these companies to increase our sales and establish, maintain and strengthen our position and reputation in the market. In addition, we believe that relationships with OEMs improve access to new technologies developed by such OEMs, thereby ensuring smooth integration of our products and technology with those of the OEMs. In furtherance of this strategy, during the last few years we entered into strategic arrangements with OEMs and continued securing successful Design Wins with OEMs who purchase our products. Revenues from sales of our products to OEM customers in 2015 constituted substantially all of our revenues. We expect the percentage of our revenues that is derived from sales to OEM customers to continue at similar percentage levels, though we believe that within our group of OEM customers we will gradually increase the proportion of our sales to Cloud/Virtualized data Center/SDN customers. This is due to the fact that: (a) the market is moving towards running applications in the Cloud; and, (b) Cloud and web 2.0 companies are typically either using standard servers or design their own “white boxes” into both of which we offer our solutions. While there are no assurances that such solutions will be accepted by such Cloud and Web 2.0 players, we believe that this trend represents significant potential for us.
The loss of some of our OEM customers, or any single key OEM customer, may have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results and we cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into strategic relationships with OEMs in the future. Normal payment terms of our OEM customers are up to 90 days net. Approximately 95% of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and may be subject to government controls and other risks, including, in some cases, export licenses, federal restrictions on export, currency fluctuations, political instability, trade restrictions and changes in tariffs and freight rates. We have experienced no material difficulties to date as a result of these factors.
Our arrangements with our OEM customers (and distributors and resellers when applicable) are generally non-exclusive. We have generally experienced good relations with our customers and are not aware of any pending terminations other than with respect to products that newer technologies have eliminated the need for.
36

Our OEM customers, distributors and resellers are not within our control. They are not obligated to purchase products from us and may represent other lines of products. A reduction in sales effort or discontinuance of sales of our products by our OEM customers could lead to reduced sales and could materially adversely affect our operating results, as we experienced during the second quarter of 2015, during which we updated our revenue projections for such quarter due to a softening of demand from some of our customers, due to longer-than-expected decision making processes together with the slower market deployment of our high-potential design wins and our new solutions for upcoming industry trends. Use of OEMs also entails the risk that OEMs will build up inventories in anticipation of a growth in sales. If such growth does not occur as anticipated, these OEMs may substantially decrease the amount of products ordered from us in subsequent quarters, discontinue product orders or even attempt to return unsold products. The loss or ineffectiveness of several of our OEM relationships at approximately the same time, or the loss of any key OEM customer, might have a material adverse effect on us.
Patents and Licenses
Our success and ability to compete are dependent to a significant degree on our technology. In order to establish and protect the technology we develop and/or acquire to use in our products, we primarily rely on a combination of non-disclosure agreements and technical measures, and to a lesser degree on patent. These measures afford only limited protection, and accordingly, there can be no assurance that the steps we take will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology or the independent development of similar technologies by others. Despite our efforts to protect our technology, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products and develop similar hardware or software or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, there can be no assurance that one or more parties will not assert infringement claims against us. The cost of responding to claims could be significant, regardless of whether the claims are valid. We cannot assure that the scope of any issued patent will adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or that patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted under the patents will provide us with meaningful protection or any commercial advantage.
On April 8, 2010, we filed a patent application in the United States in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, or the USPTO, for the "Server-Based Network Appliance", to protect our proprietary intellectual property with respect to SETAC products. On June 12, 2012 we were issued patent No. 8,199,523 entitled ‘Server-Based Network Appliance’ from the United States Patent and Trademark Office with respect to our SETAC product. The patent will expire in October, 2030. The patent covers a server-based network appliance in which a computer motherboard is mounted in a case with the bus slots of the motherboard adjacent to the rear side of the case. Communication adapter cards are mounted in the case so that the ports of these cards are accessible at the front panel. Bus extension circuitry inside the case connects the bus slots on the motherboard with the communication adapter cards, as though the cards were plugged into the motherboard. This configuration, which is used in the our SETAC product, gives the convenience of connecting and replacing modules via the front panel while using standard motherboards, which are not normally designed for front-panel access.
37

During 2012-2013, we developed a Nano-Second Time-Stamping NIC. The NIC combines Intel’s networking silicon and the Company’s time-stamping FPGA (field programmable gate array), working at wire speed to time-imprint packets.
On September 16, 2013, we acquired all of the intellectual property related to the unique Virtualization Off-Load Engine developed during the last two years by Net Perform Technology, Ltd., a privately held company registered in Hong Kong, China. The Virtualization Off-Load Engine is able to off-load CPU tasks onto a separate intelligent add-on card, thereby freeing up server cycles and improving the server’s Networking and Storage I/O. Through the acquisition, we secured exclusive access to this important technology, which we anticipate will provide us with a significant competitive advantage. We intend to continue developing, improving and utilizing this technology, as we did through the SmartSilc VHIO 1.0. Despite perceived exclusive access to this product, and our best efforts during the acquisition process to secure same, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products, services or technology without our authorization, or may assert a claim of infringement regarding the product.
On February 8, 2015 we filed a patent application (14/616,718) in the USPTO with respect to Hybrid Networking Application Switch.
For additional information regarding the risks to the Company with respect to patents and other intellectual property rights see the risk factor entitled “We may not be able to protect our intellectual proprietary rights” under Item 3.D - “Risk Factors”.
Competition
The networking and data infrastructure solutions industry is highly competitive. We face competition from numerous companies, some of which are more established, benefit from greater market recognition and have greater financial, production and marketing resources than we do. We cannot guarantee that our present or any contemplated products will continue to be distinguishable from those of our competitors or that the marketplace will find our products preferable to those of our competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that competitive pressures will not result in price reductions that could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition and the results of our operations.
38

We believe that our expanded feature set coupled with the general wide spectrum of solutions we offer gives us a competitive edge.
With respect to Server Adapters, our main competitor is Intel. In the Server Adapter product line, our competition is not as significant. To the best of our knowledge, our only significant competitors in this industry are Interface Masters, Portwell, Caswell, Lanner and Adlink. In addition, there may be other local solutions which might also compete with our products. Although the situation may change in the future, we believe that our competition in the bypass card market is less significant than our competition in the non-bypass card market.
In the Smart Cards products sector, our competition is fragmented, and differs with respect to the specific solution being offered by us. In this sector, Cavium, Tilera (now a part of Mellanox), Netronome, Napatech, Solarflare Myricom (a subsidiary of CSP), Lanner and Caswell compete with certain of our Smart Cards. With respect to the encryption products of our Smart Cards sector, our main competitor is Cavium. With respect to the compression products of our Smart Cards sector, our main competitors are Cavium and Exar. In addition, Lanner, Portwell and Nexcom compete with our compute blades and network processor based cards.
In the Stand-alone Products sector, our competition is fragmented, and differs with respect to the specific solution being offered by us. With respect to the Bypass Switches and Intelligent Bypass Switches solutions (in which solutions are offered in the form of an external box instead of an embedded card), to the best of our knowledge our main competitors are Net Optics (subsidiary of IXIA), Gigamon, and Interface Masters. With respect to our unique SETAC solution, to the best of our knowledge, there is no direct competition to our products. As network appliances may be built based on either standard servers or special hardware appliances, our SETAC products are designed to improve and enhance the competitive positioning of standard servers in the network appliance industry compared to the special hardware appliances alternative. We believe that the products offered by suppliers of special hardware appliances such as Portwell, Caswell, Nexcom, Lanner and Advantech do not provide similar solutions as the SETAC solution and therefore constitute only non-direct competition. With respect to our CPE/Edge/Low End Appliance products, to the best of our knowledge our main competitors are Portwell, Caswell, Lanner and Nexcom.
Governmental Regulation Affecting the Company
We are affected by the terms of research and development grants we have received from the OCS. Under the terms of Israeli Government participation, a royalty of 3% or up to 5% of the net sales of products developed from a project funded by the OCS must be paid under the terms of the pre-R&D Amendment regime, beginning with the commencement of sales of products developed with grant funds and ending when a dollar-linked amount equal to 100% of such grants plus interest at LIBOR is repaid. The terms of Israeli Government participation also impose significant restrictions on manufacturing outside Israel of products developed with government grants, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the pre-R&D Amendment regime. In addition, according to the pre-R&D Amendment regime the transfer to third parties of technologies developed through such projects is subject to approval of the OCS. Following the R&D Amendment there is currently much ambiguity regarding its implementation and its effect on research and development grants received prior thereto. For additional information see “Item 10. Additional Information – Taxation”.
39

In addition, we receive certain tax benefits and reduced tax rates from the Israeli government due to our status as a “Preferred Enterprise” under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments-1959, as amended. See “Item 10. Additional Information – Taxation”. The entitlement to these benefits is conditional upon our fulfillment of the conditions stipulated by the law and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In the event of failure to comply with these conditions, the benefits could be canceled and we would be required to refund the amount of the benefits, in whole or in part, with the addition of linkage differences and interest.
C. Organizational Structure
We have the following two wholly owned subsidiaries:

| · | Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. – a private company incorporated in the United States.

Fiberblaze A/S – a private company incorporated in Denmark. On December 10, 2014, we entered into the Fiberblaze SPA for the purchase of the entire holdings in Fiberblaze, pursuant to which we became its sole shareholder. As part of the Fiberblaze SPA, we have also purchased Fiberblaze US LLC, a private company incorporated in the United States, being a 100% owned subsidiary of Fiberblaze. See "Item 10. Additional Information – C. Material Contracts" for additional information on the Fiberblaze SPA.
In addition, two of our founders, Messrs. Yehuda and Zohar Zisapel, are also founders of, and in certain instances still directors and/or material shareholders of some of the corporations within the “Rad Group”. See Item 7. “Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions" for additional information on our relationships with members of this group of companies.
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
We do not own any real property, but we lease property at five locations. Our executive offices are located in Kfar Sava, Israel and our research and development facilities are located in Kfar Sava, Israel, in Søborg, Denmark and in Charlottesville, Virginia, the United States.
In November 2007, we renewed the term of the lease for our Kfar Sava offices until December 31, 2008, and have been extending such lease each year. During 2013 we extended the lease further until April, 2015, when the lease terminated in accordance with its terms. This facility was approximately 1,050 square meters in size, and we paid a monthly rent of approximately $16,000. In April 2015, following the termination of our lease due to our election not to renew it, we moved to our new offices in Kfar Sava, which we lease for a period of five years, ending in February 28, 2020, with an option to renew the term for an additional five years period. This facility is approximately 1,500 square meters in size and the monthly payments (which include various management services) are approximately $32,000.
40

We have conducted our manufacturing in Yokneam, Israel since 2000. In January 2014, following the termination our lease (which was in effect since January 2009) due to our election not to exercise our option to renew it, we moved to a new facility in Yokneam, which we lease pursuant to a sub-lease for a period of three years, ending in December 31, 2016, with an option to renew the term for an additional period of three years. This facility is approximately 2,400 square meters in size plus additional warehouse areas of approximately 250 meters in size and the monthly payments (which include rental payments, as well as fees for various management and upkeep services) are approximately $45,000.
We lease office space in Charlottesville, Virginia, the United States. The lease is for a period of 26 months ending in December 31, 2017. This facility is approximately 929 square meters in size and the monthly payments are approximately $11,000.
As of February 2004, we sub-lease office space in Paramus, New Jersey, from our affiliate, Radcom Equipment, Inc. Our current sub-lease extends until December 31, 2016. Currently, the monthly rent payments for this space are approximately $2,000. See “Item 7 – Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
We lease office space in Søborg, Denmark of approximately 472 square meters, until September 2016. If we will choose not to extend our current lease pass such date, we will seek to lease a new facility for its office space. The monthly rent payments for this space are approximately $8,000.
We believe that our facilities in Israel, the United States and Denmark are suitable and adequate for our operations as currently conducted. In the event that additional facilities are required or we need to seek alternative rental properties, we believe that we could obtain such additional or alternative facilities at commercially reasonable prices.
Item 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved staff comments.
Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
General
Silicom was incorporated in Israel and commenced operations in 1987. We have traditionally been engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and support of connectivity solutions for computers. We are currently engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and support of high performance networking and data infrastructure solutions for a broad range of servers, server based systems and communications devices. Our products are sold to OEM customers who offer networking appliances, servers and storage devices. As the market moves to utilize applications within virtualization based Cloud Data Centers, our products are now offered in this market sector as well. In 2013, 2014 and 2015 we recorded sales from all of our networking and data infrastructure solutions of approximately $73.3 million, $75.6 million and $82.7 million, respectively. We primarily sell our products through original equipment manufacturers and, to a lesser extent, through independent distributors (on a non-exclusive basis).
41

Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below.

| · | Goodwill and other intangible assets - Goodwill reflects the excess of the purchase price of business acquired over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but instead is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.

The Company operates in one operating segment and this segment comprises one reporting unit.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 provides an entity the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount prior to performing the two-step goodwill impairment test. If this is the case, the two-step goodwill impairment test is required. If it is more likely than-not that the fair value of a reporting is greater than its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.
If the two-step goodwill impairment test is required, first, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying amount (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the entity must perform step two of the impairment test (measurement). Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, step two does not need to be performed. During the year ended December 31, 2015, no impairments were found and therefore no impairment losses were recorded.
Intangible assets that are not considered to have an indefinite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful lives of up to 3 years. The acquired customer relationships, current technology, intellectual property and backlog are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits realized. This accounting policy results in amortization of such intangible assets in the straight-line method.
42

| · | Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the "weighted average-cost" method. We write down obsolete or slow moving inventory to its market value.

| · | Marketable securities – We account for investments which we intend and are able to hold to maturity, that are classified as held-to-maturity investments as defined in ASC 320-10, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”.

When other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the amortized cost basis of the investment and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings.
43

| ● | Income Taxes – We account for income taxes under ASC 740-10, "Accounting for Income taxes". Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred taxes assets to the amount expected to be realized. Valuation allowances in respect of deferred taxes were recorded in respect of the following matter:

| ● | Deferred tax assets that, as we believe, are more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the potential of realization of deferred tax assets, we consider projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as current or non-current items in accordance with the nature of the assets or liabilities to which they relate. When there are no underlying assets or liabilities the deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified in accordance with the period of expected reversal. Income tax expenses represent the tax payable for the period and the changes during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. In 2012, Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. utilized all of its loss carry-forward (in 2011, all of the valuation allowance referred to loss carry-forward related to Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc.) and therefore all related deferred tax assets and valuation allowance were derecognized. As of December 31, 2015, the deferred tax assets were $1,545 thousand and the deferred tax liabilities were $268 thousand, whereas in 2014, the deferred tax assets were to $913 thousand and the deferred tax liabilities were $543 thousand.
We recognize the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.
ASC 740, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. This interpretation prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition of tax positions, classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. ASC 740 requires significant judgment in determining what constitutes an individual tax position as well as assessing the outcome of each tax position.
44

As of January 1, 2015 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we did not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits. In addition, we do not expect that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months.

| · | Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – The Company recognizes compensation expense in accordance with ASC topic 718, "Compensation – stock compensation" based on estimated grant date fair value using an option-pricing model. Some of our share-based awards granted after January 1, 2008 include features that are not supported by the Black and Scholes valuation model, such as an expiration date to occur if the closing price of the Shares falls below 50% of the grant date share price. Therefore for such share-based awards granted after January 1, 2008, the Company recognizes compensation expense based on estimated grant date fair value using the Monte Carlo option-pricing model or the Binomial option-pricing model, while for the remaining share-based awards granted after January 1, 2008 the Company recognizes compensation expense based on estimated grant date fair value using the Black and Scholes model.

A. Operating Results
You should read the following management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in this annual report. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the relationship (in percentages) of items from our Consolidated Statement of Operations Data to our total sales:
Year Ended December 31,

|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
Sales |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | %
Cost of sales |  |  | 59.8 |  |  |  | 59.3 |  |  |  | 58.8 |
Gross profit |  |  | 40.2 |  |  |  | 40.7 |  |  |  | 41.2 |
Research and development costs |  |  | 7.5 |  |  |  | 8.6 |  |  |  | 11.7 |
Sales and marketing expenses |  |  | 5.2 |  |  |  | 5.8 |  |  |  | 6.8 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 3.5 |  |  |  | 3.7 |  |  |  | 4.4 |
Contingent consideration expense (benefit) |  |  | 0.0 |  |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  | (3.7 | )
Operating Income |  |  | 24.0 |  |  |  | 22.5 |  |  |  | 22.0 |
Financial income, net |  |  | 0.5 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 0.3 |
Income before income taxes |  |  | 24.5 |  |  |  | 22.9 |  |  |  | 22.3 |
Income tax expenses |  |  | 1.2 |  |  |  | 3.6 |  |  |  | 2.3 |
Net Income |  |  | 23.3 |  |  |  | 19.3 |  |  |  | 20.0 |

45

Sales in 2015 increased by 9.4% to 82,738 thousand compared to $75,622 thousand in 2014. The increase in sales was mainly attributed to our continued success in our target markets including those driven by trends like Cyber security, Cloud Computing, SDN, NFV, Virtualization and other trends, and to our continued success in expanding our product offering and customer base.
Sales in 2014 increased moderately by 3.2% to $75,622 thousand compared to $73,298 thousand in 2013. Our modest growth in 2014 was mainly attributed to the following overlapping factors - continued increase of ongoing orders from existing customers, continued integration of our products into some of our larger customers' product lines and the continued expansion of our customer base, offset by a lower demand for our products from our largest customer (who is not a competitor of the Company) in the total amount of approximately $6.4 million during 2014, representing approximately 8.5% of our sales in 2014. Such lower demand was attributed to the customer's typical refresh and upgrade cycle, which occurs every few years and during which our sales to customers undergoing such cycle may either decline, increase or remain steady. During 2014, the customer replaced one of its appliances which embedded Silicom cards with cards of another company. All of the above, coupled with a sharp growth of 50.4% in 2013 which created high comparable sales number for 2014, lead to our modest growth in 2014.
Gross profit in 2015 was $34,079 thousand compared to $30,787 thousand in 2014. Gross profit as a percentage of sales in 2015 was 41.2%, compared to 40.7% in 2014. Our gross profit is largely dependent on the mix of products we sell during a specific year. The higher gross profit percentage in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily a result of changes to the mix of products we sold in 2015. Gross profit is also affected, among other factors, by amortization of acquired intangible assets in the amount of $655 thousand, compared with $40 thousand in 2014 as well as by write-downs of inventory made with respect to any obsolete or slow moving inventory we can no longer use. The inventory write-downs as a percentage of sales in 2015 decreased to 0.3%, compared to 1.4% in 2014.
Gross profit in 2014 was $30,787 thousand compared to $29,433 thousand in 2013. Gross profit as a percentage of sales in 2014 was 40.7%, compared to 40.2% in 2013. Our gross profit is largely dependent on the mix of products we sell during a specific year. The higher gross profit percentage in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily a result of changes to the mix of products we sold in 2014. Gross profit is also affected, among other factors, by write-downs of inventory made with respect to any obsolete or slow moving inventory we can no longer use. The inventory write-downs as a percentage of sales in 2014 decreased to 1.4%, compared to 2.6% in 2013.
46

Research and development costs in 2015 increased by 49.7% to $9,702 thousand compared to $6,480 thousand in 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to the increase in the number of our research and development employees required for our continued investment in new product development, enhancements to existing products and the development of new networking and connectivity technologies expanding our product offering to our target markets, which contributed approximately $2,999 thousand to such increase and to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets which amounted to approximately $693thousand in 2015, compared to $95 thousand in 2014, offset by a relative strengthening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since a significant portion of our research and development expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels) of approximately $470 thousand.
Research and development costs in 2014 increased by 18.6% to $6,480 thousand compared to $5,465 thousand in 2013. This increase was mainly attributed to our continued investment in new product development, enhancements to existing products and the development of new networking and connectivity technologies which contributed approximately $876 thousand to such increase, to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets which amounted to approximately $95 thousand in 2014, compared to $20 thousand in 2013, and to a relative weakening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since a significant portion of our research and development expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels), which contributed approximately $44 thousand to such increase.
Sales and marketing expenses in 2015 increased by 27.9% to $5,651 thousand compared to $4,418 thousand in 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to our continued investment in the promotion of our server networking products to our target markets including those driven by trends like Cyber security, Cloud Computing, SDN, NFV, Virtualization and other trends, by, among others, our continued effort to expand exposure of our product offering and expanding our customer base , which contributed approximately $1,176 thousand to such increase and to an increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets which amounted to approximately $262 thousand in 2015, compared to $10 thousand in 2014, offset by a relative strengthening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since a significant portion of our sales and marketing expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels) of approximately $205 thousand.
Sales and marketing expenses in 2014 increased by 15.7% to $4,418 thousand compared to $3,818 thousand in 2013. This increase was mainly attributed to our continued investment in the promotion of our server networking products, which contributed approximately $581 thousand to such increase, and to a relative weakening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since part of our selling and marketing expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels), which contributed approximately $ 19 thousand to such increase.
47

General and administrative expenses in 2015 increased by 29.1% to $3,611 thousand compared to $2,798 thousand in 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to the growth in our activity, which contributed approximately $685 thousand to such increase, and to acquisition related expenses, which contributed approximately $299 thousand to such increase, offset by a relative strengthening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since a significant portion of our sales and marketing expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels) of approximately $171 thousand.
In 2015 we had a contingent consideration benefit in the amount of $3,090 thousand compared to an expense of $45 thousand in 2014. For additional information see Note 3B to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
General and administrative expenses in 2014 increased by 10.5% to $2,843 thousand (out of which $45 thousand expenses were related to contingent consideration), compared to $2,572 thousand in 2013. This increase was mainly attributed to the growth in our activity, which contributed approximately $250 thousand to such increase, and to a relative weakening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (since a significant portion of our general and administrative expenses are incurred in New Israeli Shekels), which contributed approximately $21 thousand to such increase.
Financial income, net in 2015 decreased by 16.3% to $220 thousand compared to $263 thousand in 2014. The decrease was primarily attributed to increase in expenses attributed to the relative strengthening of the US Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (a significant portion of our balance sheet assets and obligations are denominated in New Israeli Shekels), and to increase in bank fees.
Financial income, net in 2014 decreased by 34.9% to $263 thousand compared to $404 thousand in 2013. The decrease was primarily caused by the relative weakening of the US dollar against the New Israeli Shekel (a significant portion of our balance sheet assets and obligations are denominated in New Israeli Shekels), which created a net financial expense in US dollars from exchange rate differences, and the decrease in yields from investments in marketable securities.
In 2015 we recorded current income tax expenses of $2,848 thousand and deferred income tax benefit of $907 thousand compared to similar current income tax expenses of $2,903 thousand and deferred income tax benefit of $219 thousand in 2014. The increase in deferred income tax benefit was mainly attributed to tax benefits relating to share based compensation provided by us to our employees and directors, which amounted to $242 thousand compared to $0 thousand in 2014, to an increase in deferred income tax benefit in relation to amortization of acquired intangible assets, which amounted to $280 thousand in 2015 compared to $19 thousand in 2014, and to tax loss carryforwards, which amounted to $179 thousand in 2015 compared to $0 thousand in 2014. In addition, in 2015 we recorded income tax benefits relating to prior years of $36 thousand, and in 2014 we recorded income tax expenses relating to prior years of $20 thousand.
48

In 2014 we recorded current income tax expenses of $2,903 thousand and deferred income tax benefit of $219 thousand compared to current income tax expenses of $1,428 thousand and deferred income tax benefit of $552 thousand in 2013. In addition, in 2014 we recorded income tax expenses relating to prior years of $20 thousand, and in 2013 we recorded income tax expenses relating to prior years of $29 thousand.
In 2015 we recorded net income of $16,520 thousand compared to net income of $14,605 thousand in 2014, a 13.1% increase. This increase was mainly due to the increase in our activity and sales.
In 2014 we recorded net income of $14,605 thousand compared to net income of $17,077 thousand in 2013, a 14.5% decrease. This decrease was mainly due to higher operating expenses which we incurred during 2014 and to a higher corporate income tax rate effective as of 2014, whereas our sales remained similar to previous years.
Impact of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations, Liabilities and Assets
Since the majority of our revenues are denominated and paid in U.S. dollars, we believe that inflation in Israel and in Denmark and fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rates do not have any material effect on our revenue. Inflation in Israel or Denmark and the Israeli and Danish currency as well as U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations, may however, have an effect on our expenses and, as a result, on our net income/loss. The cost of our Israeli and Danish operations, as expressed in U.S. dollars, is influenced by the extent to which any change in the rates of inflation in Israel or Denmark are not offset (or are offset on a lagging basis) by a change in valuation of the NIS or DKK in relation to the U.S. dollar.
We do not presently engage in any hedging or other transactions intended to manage the risks relating to foreign currency exchange rate or interest rate fluctuations. However, we may in the future undertake such transactions, if management determines that it is necessary to offset such risks.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2015, we had working capital of $59,419 thousand and our current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) was 4.00. Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015 increased by $288 thousand to $18,178 thousand, compared to $17,890 thousand as of December 31, 2014.
We did not have any short-term bank deposits in 2015, compared to $4,000 thousand short-term bank deposits as of December 31, 2014.
Short-term marketable securities decreased by $6,531 thousand to $8,636 thousand, compared to $15,167 thousand as of December 31, 2014, and long-term marketable securities increased by $3,888 thousand to $24,246 thousand, compared to $20,358 thousand as of December 31, 2014. The net decrease of $6,355 thousand in these four balance sheet items in 2015 was mainly due to acquisitions which contributed an expenditure of approximately $10,000 thousand to such changes, to payment of dividend which contributed approximately $7,300 thousand to such changes and to property, plant and equipment expenditures which contributed approximately $3,000 thousand to such changes, offset by positive cash provided by operating activities in the amount of $13,000 thousand and to consideration received in connection with exercise of options to purchase our ordinary shares in the amount of approximately $943 thousands.
49

Trade receivables (including trade receivable from related parties; For additional information regarding trade receivables from related parties see "Item 7B. – Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions – Related Party Transactions.") increased to $23,768 thousand as of December 31, 2015, compared to $18,831 thousand as of December 31, 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to the increase of our activity.
Other receivables decreased to $1,380 thousand as of December 31, 2015, compared to $1,632 thousand as of December 31, 2014.
Trade payables increased to $8,556 thousand as of December 31, 2015, compared to $8,236 thousand as of December 31, 2014. Other payables and accrued liabilities increased to $11,147 thousand as of December 31, 2015, compared to $5,783 thousand as of December 31, 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to the payment of contingent consideration which the Company is obligated to pay under the Fiberblaze SPA to the Fiberblaze sellers in the amount of $1,498 thousand pursuant to achievement of certain pre-determined milestones and to the payment of the first contingent consideration which the Company is obligated to pay under the ADI APA to the ADI sellers in the amount of $3,000 thousand pursuant to the achievement of certain pre-determined first milestone.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2015 amounted to $13,287 thousand compared to $20,684 thousand in 2014. The cash provided by operating activities in 2015 was the result of our positive operating income.
Inventories increased to $26,321 thousand as of December 31, 2015, compared to $25,449 thousand as of December 31, 2014.
Capital expenditures on property and equipment for the year ended at December 31, 2015 were $2,969 thousand, compared to $1,838 thousand as of December 31, 2014. This increase was mainly attributed to investment in our leased property designated to better accommodate our needs.
We have cash and cash equivalents that we believe are sufficient for our present requirements. Furthermore, our cash resources are sufficient to fund our operating needs for at least the next twelve months.
50

C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
Since we commenced operations, we have conducted extensive research, development and engineering activities. Our efforts emphasize the development of new products, cost reduction of current products, and the enhancement of existing products, generally in response to rapidly changing customer preferences, technologies and industry standards.
Because the market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards, our success depends upon our ability to select, develop, manufacture and market new and enhanced products in a timely manner to meet changing market needs. As such, we invest significant resources in research and new product development, enhancements to existing products, and the development of new networking and connectivity technologies, and we expect to continue to do so.
As of June 2012 we have a patent No. 8,199,523 entitled ‘Server-Based Network Appliance’ from the United States Patent and Trademark Office with respect to our SETAC product.
As of December 2014, we own or have licenses or similar rights with respect to Fiberblaze, including Fiberblaze's high performance OEM hardware platform for Ethernet and network interface product family, registered names and domain name.
As of September 2015, we own all intellectual property and intellectual property rights in which ADI has an ownership interest or have licenses or similar right where ADI has such licenses or rights, including with respect to custom embedded, communications and networking products based on the latest Intel silicon, registered names and domain name.
We cannot assure you that the scope of any issued patent will adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or that patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted under the patents will provide us with meaningful protection or any commercial advantage.
On September 16, 2013, we acquired all of the intellectual property related to the unique Virtualization Off-Load Engine developed during the last two years by Net Perform Technology, Ltd., a privately held company registered in Hong Kong, China. The Virtualization Off-Load Engine is able to off-load CPU tasks onto a separate intelligent add-on card, thereby freeing up server cycles and improving the server’s Networking and Storage I/O. Through the acquisition, we secured exclusive access to this important technology, and we intend to continue developing and improving upon this technology. Despite perceived exclusive access to this product, and our best efforts during the acquisition process to secure same, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products, services or technology without our authorization, or assert a claim of infringement regarding the product.
51

On February 8, 2015 we filed a patent application (14/616,718) in the USPTO with respect to Hybrid Networking Application Switch.
For additional information regarding the risks to the Company with respect to patents and other intellectual property rights see the risk factor entitled “We may not be able to protect our intellectual proprietary rights” under Item 3.D - “Risk Factors”.
The Government of Israel encourages research and development projects oriented towards products for export or projects which will otherwise benefit the Israeli economy. In each of the three fiscal years from 1999 to 2001, we received grants from the OCS for the development of systems and products. We have received from the OCS up to 30% of certain research and development expenditures for particular projects. Under the terms of Israeli Government participation as in effect prior to the R&D Amendment, a royalty of 2% or up to 5% of the net sales of products developed from a project funded by the OCS must be paid, beginning with the commencement of sales of products developed with grant funds and ending when a dollar-linked amount equal to 100% of such grants without interest, for projects approved prior to December 2000, and plus interest at LIBOR, for amounts received after that date, is repaid. The terms of Israeli Government participation, as in effect prior to the R&D Amendment, also place restrictions on the location of the manufacturing of products developed with government grants, which, in general, must be performed in Israel, and on the transfer to third parties of technologies developed through projects in which the government participates. The R&D Amendment amended the core terms of the Israeli Government participation and placed substantial discretion in a new authority established to replace the OCS and provided only guidelines regarding material terms such as royalty rates and transfer of know-how developed with government grants. See “Item 10. Additional Information - Taxation”. We received approximately 20% of certain research and development expenditures for a particular project in 2003 and approximately 30% of such expenditures for a particular project in 2004. We did not have any new grant programs with the OCS from 2005 to 2015. In August 2005, we received approval for a $54 thousand dollar grant from the Korea-Israel Industrial Research and Development Foundation, or Koril-RDF, in connection with the joint development of a certain product with a Korean company. Under the terms of this grant we are required to repay the amounts received at a rate of 2.5% per year of our gross sales of the product developed with the grant in each such year, until 100% of the grant (and any other sums received from Koril-RDF) are repaid. The annual payment for every year following the first sale of the product will not exceed certain percentages of the amounts received from Koril-RDF. As of January 2006 and to date, our research and development activities have been sponsored and funded by us, and we did not participate in any new encouragement programs or received any additional grants from the OCS or Koril-RDF. As of December 31, 2015, we have closed all of our OCS funded programs, and do not anticipate having any sales of products funded by OCS grants or be required to pay any royalties to the OCS with respect thereto.
52

We expect that we will continue to commit resources to research and development in the future. As of March 31, 2016, we had 83 employees engaged primarily in research and development and design activities of which 49 employees in Israel, 20 in Denmark and 14 in the U.S.A. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, our research and development expenses were $5,465, $6,480 and $9,702 respectively, constituting approximately 7.5%, 8.6% and 11.7% respectively, of our sales. The increase in our research and development expenses in 2015 compared to 2014 was mainly attributed to the increase in the number of our research and development employees required for our continued investment in new product development, enhancements to existing products and the development of new networking and connectivity technologies expanding our product offering to our target markets, as well as to the increase in amortization of acquired intangible assets. For additional information concerning commitments to pay royalties on sales of products developed from projects funded by the OCS, see “Item 10. Additional Information - Taxation.”
D. Trend Information
In today’s network-based environment, there is a growing demand for server-based systems. We believe that the markets for such systems are continuously growing. Exploding data and internet traffic increase the need for connectivity and bandwidth, which results in the increased need of networking throughput, connectivity, compute power and storage. Such growing demand was the basis for the emerging technologies of virtualization, cloud and SDN, all of which are targeting the implementation of a more effective model for all the above mentioned tasks.
In view of such an anticipated increase in Cloud-based data centers utilizing virtualization and SDN, the systems are expected to be increasingly based on generic server platforms. These platforms will all need offload capabilities in order to address the performance challenges realized due to the huge amount of traffic, the high volume of data, the need to encrypt such data, the need to run in virtualized environment, which by itself is a challenge for the server CPU, and the need to include switching within the server for high efficiency SDN. We anticipate that consequently the demand for add-on adapters which address these challenges will grow. Power, heat and space limitations in such environments increase the need for hardware accelerators. Such systems will require essential building blocks in their own generic severs, which can be served by our products.
We address the above needs with a comprehensive suite of cards that integrate encryption and compression functionality, with the Virtualization Off-Load Engine which is able to off-load these CPU tasks onto a separate intelligent add-on card thereby freeing up server cycles and improving the server’s Networking and Storage I/O, with our generic off-loading platforms based on network processors and with our redirector cards which deal with load balancing between servers/CPUs/CPU cores and perform traffic filtering to increase the efficiency of the server. We believe that our Server network interface cards (with and without bypass), Intelligent and programmable cards, and Stand-alone products will all continue to be key driver of our growth in the coming years. A distinct advantage of these products is that the demand in the server based industry has been continuously growing, especially as our products are suited to the growth in Big Data and the Cloud (including SDN).
The sales cycles in the markets for our products are long, and continuing to achieve Design Wins according to the process described above and obtaining new customers is time consuming. However, each Design Win we have achieved and do achieve may represent an opportunity for sustained, long-term revenues once we establish a relationship with a customer.
53

Although we expect our business and products to further develop in the coming years, there is no assurance that we will continue to generate significant sales in the areas in which we operate.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
On July 22, 2002, our Audit Committee and the Board of Directors approved an Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers. Our shareholders approved the terms of this agreement in a General and Extraordinary Meeting held on January 7, 2004. In Amendment 3 to the Companies Law, the instances in which a company may indemnify its officers and directors were broadened. In December 2007 each of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved a new form of Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers so as to reflect this amendment. Our shareholders approved the terms of this new Indemnification Agreement in January 2008. The Agreement provides that the directors and officers will be exempt from liability in certain circumstances. The Agreement also provides for the indemnification by us for certain obligations and expenses imposed on the officer in connection with an act performed in his or her capacity as an officer of the Company. This right to indemnification is limited, and does not cover, among other things, a breach of an officer’s duty of loyalty, a willful breach of an officer’s duty of care, or a reckless disregard for the circumstances or consequences of a breach of duty of care. The right to indemnification also does not cover acts that are taken intentionally to unlawfully realize personal gain. The maximum amount of our liability under these Indemnification Agreements for any monetary obligation imposed on an officer or a director in favor of another person by a judgment is currently $3,000,000 for each instance of a covered scenario. In addition we would be liable to indemnify the officer or director for all reasonable litigation expenses with respect to certain proceedings. We are not aware of any material pending action that may result in anyone claiming such indemnification.
An amendment in 2011 to the Israeli Securities Law, and a corresponding amendment to the Companies Law, authorized the Israeli Securities Authority to impose administrative sanctions against Israeli public companies and their office holders for certain violations of the Israeli Securities Law or the Companies Law. These sanctions include monetary sanctions and certain restrictions on serving as a director or senior officer of a public company for certain periods of time. The Israeli Securities Law and to the Companies Law provide that only certain types of such liabilities may be reimbursed by indemnification and insurance. Specifically, legal expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by an individual in the applicable administrative enforcement proceeding and certain compensation payable to injured parties for damages suffered by them are permitted to be reimbursed via indemnification or insurance, provided that such indemnification and insurance are authorized by the company's articles of association, and receive the requisite corporate approvals. In January 2012 each of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved a new form of Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers serving in such capacities from time to time so as to reflect this amendment, and at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders held on April 11, 2012 our shareholders approved these amendments to the Articles of Association and a revised form of Indemnification Agreement for directors serving in such capacity from time to time.
54

As per Amendment 20 to the Companies Law, it was decided on July 31, 2013, at the Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders to adopt the Executive Compensation Policy of the Company, which was recommended by our Compensation Committee and approved by our Board of Directors. The Executive Compensation Policy included the above referenced form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into by the Company with our directors and officers serving in such capacities from time to time. The Executive Compensation Policy also noted that going forward, any change to the Indemnification Agreement, including any changes which materially depart from the key terms of the current agreement (provided that such changes apply equally to all executives of the Company, including directors) will be submitted to the Company’s Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors for their approval but shall not, unless required by law or the Company’s Articles of Association, be presented at a General Meeting of the shareholders. As set forth in the Companies Law, an Executive Compensation Policy for a period exceeding three years has to be re-approved once every three years. Accordingly, we intend to bring our amended Executive Compensation Policy for shareholders approval on the next annual general meeting of our shareholders.
We are not party to any other material off-balance sheet arrangements or contingent obligations.
F. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations
The following table shows our outstanding contractual obligations by category and by payments due as of December 31, 2015:

|  | Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations |  | Total |  |  | Less than 1 year |  |  | 1-3 years |  |  | 3-5 years |  | More than 5 years
Operating Leases |  | $ | 2,877 |  |  | $ | 1,434 |  |  | $ | 1,010 |  |  | $ | 433 |  |
Purchase Obligations |  | $ | 12,714 |  |  | $ | 12,714 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Total |  | $ | 15,591 |  |  | $ | 14,148 |  |  | $ | 1,010 |  |  | $ | 433 |  |

Our total outstanding contingencies in respect of OCS royalty-bearing participations received or accrued, net of royalties paid or accrued before interest, amounted to approximately $2,960 thousand as of December 31, 2015 which are attributable to sales of certain discontinued products. As of the date of this annual report, all of our OCS programs have been closed per our request, we are not anticipating any sales of our products developed with OCS funding and accordingly don't expect to be required to pay any royalties to the OCS. In the unlikely event we do sell products developed using OCS funding, we will be required to pay royalties to the OCS as set forth in the R&D Law.
55

Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Company's Balance Sheet:
The liability for employees’ severance benefits amounted to approximately $2,251 thousand as of December 31, 2015.
The liability for employees’ severance benefits is calculated on the basis of the latest monthly salary paid to each employee multiplied by the number of years of employment. The liability is covered by the amounts deposited by us into employees’ managers’ insurance and/or pension fund accounts in respect of severance obligations to such employees, including accumulated income thereon as well as by the unfunded provision reflected on the balance sheet. Such liability will be removed, either by termination of employment or retirement. While the timing of such obligations cannot be pre-determined (and as such were not included in the above table), such liability will be removed, either by termination of employment or retirement.
Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following table and notes thereto set forth information regarding our directors and senior management as of March 31, 2016.

Name | Age | Position with Company
Avi Eizenman(1) | 58 | Active Chairman of the Board
Shaike Orbach(1) | 64 | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Zohar Zisapel(2) | 67 | Former Director
Ayelet Aya Hayak | 46 | External Director
Ilan Erez | 48 | External Director
Eli Doron(3) | 63 | Director
Eran Gilad | 48 | Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary

(1) | Was re-elected for an additional one-year term, commencing as of July 28, 2015.

(2) | Served as a Director until his cessation of service on July 28, 2015.

(3) | Was elected for a one-year term, commencing as of July 28, 2015.

56

Avi Eizenman co-founded the Company in 1987 and has served as a Director since its inception. Mr. Eizenman also served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from the Company’s inception until April 1, 2001, and on such date, he resigned from his positions as President and Chief Executive Officer and was appointed Active Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Eizenman served as head of the ASIC department at Scitex Ltd. in 1986. From 1979 until 1985, Mr. Eizenman held various positions, including project manager, ASIC specialist and engineer, with the Electronic Research & Development Department of the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Mr. Eizenman holds a B.Sc. degree, with honors, in Electrical Engineering from the Technion, and an M.B.A. from Tel Aviv University.
Shaike Orbach has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2001. In December 2001, Mr. Orbach was named a Director, replacing Zohar Zisapel, who resigned from the Board of Directors. Prior to that, for a period of four and a half years, Mr. Orbach was President and CEO of Opgal Ltd., a high-tech subsidiary of Israel’s Rafael and El-Op corporations. Previously, he was General Manager of Edusoft, an Israeli company the shares of which were traded on the NASDAQ National Market (now, the NASDAQ Global Market), and Managing Director of Tecsys Ltd. He holds a B.Sc degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Technion.
Zohar Zisapel is a co-founder of the Company. He served as a Director from the Company's inception and until 2001. In September 2010, he was elected again as Director in the Company and served as Director until July 2015. Mr. Zisapel is also a founder and a director of RAD Data Communications Ltd., of which he served as CEO from January 1982 until January 1998 and has served as chairman from 1998 until 2013. Mr. Zisapel serves as chairman of two other public companies – Ceragon Networks Ltd. (Ticker Symbol CRNT) and RADCOM Ltd. (Ticker Symbol RDCM) – and as chairman or director of several private companies. The Company has certain dealings with members of the Rad Group (see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” below). Since July 2008, Mr. Zisapel has been a director of Amdocs Limited (Ticker Symbol DOX). Mr. Zisapel received a B.Sc. and a M.Sc. in electrical engineering from the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, and an M.B.A. from Tel Aviv University.
Ayelet Aya Hayak was elected by the shareholders as an external director for an initial three-year term commencing July 1, 2013 and is expected to be recommended for a second three-year term in the next annual general meeting of our shareholders. Ms. Hayak serves as a director in several public companies, among which are New Horizon Group Ltd., One Software Technologies (O.S.T.) Ltd., MYDAS Fund Investments Ltd., Danel (Adir Yehushua) Ltd., B.S.R. Projects Ltd., Financitech Ltd., and M.I. Holdings Ltd. Additionally, Ms. Hayak also serves as the chairman of the board of directors of S.D.S (Star Defense Systems) Ltd. Between 2009 and 2011 Ms. Hayak served as the CEO of Paula Ltd. Ms. Hayek holds a BA degree in accounting and business administration from the Tel Aviv College of Management and is also a Certified Public Accountant.
57

Ilan Erez has co-Managed the Software Business Unit of 3D Systems Corporation (NYSE: DDD) since May 2015. 3D Systems provides comprehensive 3D products and services, including 3D printers, print materials, on-demand parts services and digital design and manufacturing tools. From 2005 to 2015, Mr. Erez served as Chief Financial Officer of Cimatron Ltd. (Ticker Symbol CIMT) engaged in the design and sale of CAD/CAM software for the tool-making and discrete manufacturing industries, since July 2005. From 1998 to 2005 Mr. Erez served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. He also served as VP Operations of the Company from May 2001 to 2005. From 1996 to 1998 Mr. Erez served as Controller and assistant to the Chief Executive Officer at Bio-Dar Ltd. From 1994 to 1996 Mr. Erez served as an auditor at Kesselman & Kesselman, a member of Price Waterhouse Coopers. Mr. Erez is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel and holds a B.A in Accounting and Economics from the Hebrew University and an LL.M. in Business Law from Bar-Ilan University. Mr. Ilan Erez has served as an external director of the Company since 2010, was re-elected by the shareholders as an external director for a second three-year term commencing July 1, 2013 and is expected to be recommended for an third three year term in the next annual general meeting of our shareholders.
Eran Gilad was our Chief Financial Officer since May 2005 and the Secretary of the Company since 2012. From 1995 to 2005 Mr. Gilad held senior financial and operational positions in various public and private companies operating in the high-tech field. He is a Certified Public Accountant in Israel and holds an M.A in Economics from Tel-Aviv University and a B.A in Accounting and Economics from Tel-Aviv University.
Eli Doron is the founder of Connesta Ltd. ("Connesta"), an Israeli high-tech company engaged in developing and providing SaaS virtual control room solutions, founded in 2011. From inception, Mr. Doron serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Connesta. Prior thereto and during 2010, Mr. Doron was the Chief Executive Officer of Computerized Electricity Systems ("CES"). Prior to joining CES, Mr. Doron was the co-founder of Radvision Ltd. (formerly Nasdaq: RVSN. Acquired by Avaya Ltd. in 2011; "Radvision"). From 1992 and until 2009 Mr. Doron served as the Chief Technology Officer of Radvision, and from 2006 and until 2009 he served as President of Radvision. Prior to founding Radvision and from 1983, Mr. Doron served at SIMTECH Advanced Training and Simulation Systems Ltd., initially as hardware manager and from 1998 as Chief Technology Officer. Prior thereto and from 1977, Mr. Doron served as an electronic engineer at MBT Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd. Mr. Doron holds a B.Sc degree in electronics and computer science from Ben-Gurion University and an M.B.A. degree from the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom.
58

B. Compensation
In accordance with the Companies Law, the following table presents information regarding compensation actually received by our five most highly paid executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2015. All amounts are in USD.

Name and Position |  | Salary and Benefits(1) |  |  | Cash Bonus(2) |  |  | Equity-based Compensation(3) |  |  | Total |
Avi Eizenman – Active Chairman |  |  | 467,024 |  |  |  | 162,300 |  |  |  | 538,768 |  |  |  | 1,168,092 |
Yeshayahu ("Shaike") Orbach – CEO and President |  |  | 318,310 |  |  |  | 162,300 |  |  |  | 538,768 |  |  |  | 1,019,378 |
David Castiel – VP Engineering |  |  | 190,099 |  |  |  | 16,723 |  |  |  | 91,586 |  |  |  | 298,407 |
David Hendel – VP Research and Development |  |  | 188,175 |  |  |  | 16,723 |  |  |  | 91,586 |  |  |  | 296,482 |
Elad Blatt – VP Business Development and Sales North America |  |  | 179,938 |  |  |  | 21,867 |  |  |  | 91,586 |  |  |  | 293,391 |

| (1) | "Salary and Benefits" include annual salary or service fees paid, payments to the National Insurance Institute, manager's insurance and pension funds, severance, advanced education funds, basic health insurance, vacation pay, recuperation pay, tax gross-up payments, automobile-related expenses, telephone expenses and benefits and perquisites as mandated by Israeli or applicable law.

| (2) | "Cash Bonus" includes bonus payments as recorded in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.

| (3) | "Equity-based Compensation" includes the expense recorded in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 with respect to equity-based compensation granted to the executive offices detailed above.

The aggregate direct remuneration paid to all persons as a group who served in the capacity of director or executive officer during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $2,535 thousand. The aggregate amount accrued to provide for severance payments to all persons as a group who served in the capacity of director or executive officer as of the year ended December 31, 2015 was $921 thousand. The severance terms of our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, as previously approved by the audit committee, board of directors and shareholders of the Company, and in accordance with the Executive Compensation Policy of the Company which was approved by the shareholders, may entitle them, in certain circumstances, to additional payments. We have not paid any compensation to Zohar Zisapel for serving on our board of directors until his cessation of service on July 2015. We do pay cash compensation to Avi Eizenman who is an active Chairman of the Board, and to Shaike Orbach, who is the President and Chief Executive Officer.
59

Avi Eizenman and Shaike Orbach may also be entitled to cash bonuses by meeting some pre-determined thresholds, and as calculated based on a pre-determined formulas set by our board of directors, as approved by the annual general meeting of our shareholders for the years 2013 and 2014-2016 on April 30, 2014. Mr. Eizenman and Mr. Orbach's 2014-2016 cash bonuses may not exceed the value of 18 of their monthly salaries, respectively, and their cash bonus formulas are taking into consideration the erosion rate from the 2013 annual bonus formulas, according to which their cash bonus formulas were based on achieving one or more of the following thresholds: (i) the Company's actual revenue for 2013 was 80% or more of the pre-determined budget target; and (ii) the Company's actual operating profit for 2013 was 65% or more of the pre-determined budget target, and are based on achieving one or more of the following thresholds: (i) the Company's actual revenue for any of the years 2014-2016 is 80% or more of the pre-determined budget target for the relevant year; and (ii) the Company's actual operating profit for any of the years 2014-2016 is 65% or more of the pre-determined budget target for the relevant year. The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, raise or lower such annual cash bonuses by up to 20%. Furthermore, in accordance with the Company's recoupment policy, Mr. Eizenman and Mr. Orbach may be required to reimburse the Company for the cash bonuses (or any part thereof) paid in the previous 3 years, in the event such cash bonuses were based on financial data included in the Company's financial statements that were found to be inaccurate and were subsequently restated.
Non-employee directors, including External Directors within the meaning of the Companies Law, are entitled to be paid cash compensation for board and any committee member services, as applicable, in accordance with the amounts which are permitted under the Companies Regulations (Rules Regarding Compensation and Expenses of External Directors) - 2000 enacted pursuant to the Companies Law. Office holders, including External Directors or Independent Directors, may waive their entitlement to their compensation, subject to applicable law.
All our officers other than the external directors work full time for us. We do not currently grant any variable bonus or equity based compensation, nor any separation payments to our non-employee directors. Certain of the compensation previously paid to our directors was paid in the form of options under the Silicom Directors Share Incentive Option Plan (1994) (under which there are presently no options outstanding) and certain of such compensation is paid in the form of options which were granted under the Share Option Plan (2004) or RSU’s which will be granted under the Silicom Ltd - Global Share Incentive Plan (2013), described below.
60

On December 30, 2004, our shareholders adopted our Share Option Plan (2004). Under the original terms of the Share Option Plan (2004) up to a maximum of 282,750 of our ordinary shares are reserved for issuance, subject to certain adjustments, upon the exercise of options granted to employees, directors, officers, consultants and service providers. In December 2007, the Board of Directors increased the number of our ordinary shares available for issuance under the Share Option Plan (2004) by 300,000. In August 2012, the Board of Directors increased the number of our ordinary shares available for issuance under the Share Option Plan (2004) by an additional 500,000. The Share Option Plan (2004) is administered by the board of directors, which designates the optionees, dates of grant, vesting periods and the exercise price of options. The options are non-assignable except by the laws of descent. Certain tax advantages apply to certain of our directors, officers and employees with respect to options granted to them under the Share Option Plan (2004). As of March 31, 2016, we have granted a total of 1,036,000 options under the Share Option Plan (2004), of which (i) 200,000 options were granted to Mr. Avi Eizenman, such that: (a) 30,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $2.53 (which would have otherwise terminated on December 30, 2014); (b) 40,000 expired in July 2008, (c) 40,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $3.82 (which would have otherwise terminated on the earlier of October 15, 2016 or the closing price of our shares falling below $1.91), (d) 50,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $18.82 (which would have otherwise terminated on the earlier December 21, 2018 or the closing price of our shares falling below $9.41), and (d) 40,000 were granted with an exercise price of $15.28 and a termination date of the earlier of September 13, 2020 or the closing price of our shares falling below $7.64, of which 20,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $15.28; (ii) 30,000 options were granted to Mr. Yehuda Zisapel (who was formerly a Director of the Company) and exercised at an exercise price of $2.53 (which would have terminated on December 30, 2014); (iii) 200,000 options were granted to Mr. Shaike Orbach, of which (a) 30,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $2.53 (which would have otherwise terminated on December 30, 2014), (b) 40,000 expired in July 2008, (c) 40,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $3.82 (which would have otherwise terminated on the earlier of October 15, 2016 or the closing price of our shares falling below $1.91), (d) 50,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $18.82 (which would have otherwise terminated on the earlier of December 21, 2018 or the closing price of our shares falling below $9.41) and (e) 40,000 were exercised at an exercise price of $15.28 (which would have otherwise terminated on the earlier of September 13, 2020 or the closing price of our shares falling below $7.64); (iv) 30,000 options were granted to Ms. Einat Domb-Har (who was a former external director of the Company) and exercised at an exercise price of $2.53 (which would have terminated on December 30, 2014) ; and (v) 30,000 options were granted to Mr. Ilan Kalmanovich (who was a former external director of the Company) and exercised at an exercise price of $2.53 (which would have terminated on December 30, 2014). 36,625 of the options granted under the Share Option Plan (2004) were returned to the company due to certain employees who left their positions not exercising their options and 200,000 of the options granted under the Share Option Plan (2004) expired without exercise due to the expiration of their term. The Share Option Plan (2004) expired at the end of 2014, upon which expiration any unallocated shares under this plan have been returned to the general pool of registered but unissued share capital of the Company.
61

On October 21, 2013, our board of directors adopted our Global Share Incentive Plan (2013). On April 30, 2014, the annual general meeting of our shareholders approved the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013) to qualify for incentive stock options for U.S. tax purposes. The Global Share Incentive Plan (2013) is administered by the board of directors, which determines the number of our ordinary shares available for issuance under the plan, designates the award recipients and types of awards, dates of grant, vesting periods and the exercise price of awards. Under the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013) the Company may grant awards of options, restricted shares, restricted share units (“RSU’s”) or other equity based awards. The board of directors has determined that initially up to a maximum of 500,000 of our ordinary shares are reserved for issuance, subject to certain adjustments, upon the exercise of equity based awards granted to employees, directors, officers, consultants and service providers. The awards are non-assignable except by the laws of descent. Certain tax advantages apply to certain of our directors, officers and employees with respect to equity based awards granted to them under Global Share Incentive Plan (2013). As of March 31, 2016, we have granted a total of 82,000 RSUs under the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013), of which a total of (i) 25,000 RSUs were granted to Mr. Avi Eizenman, and (ii) 25,000 RSUs were granted to Mr. Shaike Orbach, pursuant to the approval of our compensation committee, board of directors and annual general meeting of our shareholders, which gave effect to such grants in its meeting on April 30, 2014.
In addition, in March 2015, our compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, have approved the grant of a total of 92,591 options under the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013), of which a total of (i) 13,333 options were granted to Mr. Avi Eizenman, and (ii) 13,333 options were granted to Mr. Shaike Orbach, which, pursuant to the approval of our Annual General Meeting, became effective on July 28, 2015.
C. Board Practices
Each of Avi Eizenman and Shaike Orbach was re-elected, and Eli Doron was elected, to the board of directors most recently on July 28, 2015 to serve until the next Annual General Meeting, which is currently scheduled to convene in June 2016, subject to the Companies Law and our Amended and Restated Articles of Association. Avi Eizenman is a founder of the Company and has served as a Director since our inception in 1987. On July 1, 2010 Mr. Ilan Erez was elected as an external director for an initial term of three years in accordance with Section 245(a) of the Israeli Companies Law, with such terms ending as of July 1, 2013. At the Annual General Meeting of our shareholders held on April 14, 2013, the shareholders re-elected Mr. Ilan Erez as an external director for an additional second three-year term, and elected Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak as an external director for an initial three-year term, with such terms of office for the external directors commencing as of July 1, 2013. Mr. Ilan Erez and Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak are expected to be brought for re-election as External Directors for a third three-year term and second three-year term, respectively, on the next Annual General Meeting of our shareholders, scheduled to convene in June, 2016.
62

None of the members of the board of directors is entitled to receive any severance or similar benefits upon termination of his or her service with the board of directors, except for Avi Eizenman, who also functions as the active Chairman of the Board and Shaike Orbach, who also functions as President and Chief Executive Officer (See “Item 6.B. Directors and Senior Management – Compensation” above).
In December 2007 our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved severance arrangements for each of Mr. Avi Eizenman and Mr. Shaike Orbach, which provide for extended notice provisions and severance payments in the event of termination. The arrangements were approved by our shareholders in January 2008, and include the following main terms and conditions (identical with respect to each of Mr. Avi Eizenman and Mr. Shaike Orbach):
Notice of Termination
The termination of the executive’s employment, by him or by us, for any reason other than cause (which is generally defined as willful conduct or omission materially injurious to the company), death or disability, shall require 12 months advance written notice. If, however, following a change in control transaction, either: (i) he shall give notice of termination of his employment for good reason (which is generally defined as an adverse change to the status, responsibilities, salary or other material terms of his employment); or (ii) we shall give notice of termination of his employment for any reason other than cause or disability, 18 months advance written notice shall be required. A change in control transaction includes transactions such as sale of all or substantially all of the company’s shares or assets, or a merger, acquisition, or other reorganization in which control of our company changes following such transaction.
Severance Payments
If the executive’s employment shall be terminated for any reason other than cause, he shall be entitled to receive his last full monthly salary multiplied by the number of years (or portions thereof) that he was employed by us (i.e. the severance amount he would be entitled to receive under the Israeli law, had we terminated his employment for any reason other than cause) (the “Severance Law Amount”). If, however, his employment shall be terminated: (i) by the company for any reason other than cause or disability; or (ii) by him for a good reason following a change in control, he shall be entitled to receive one and half times the Severance Law Amount. If the executive’s employment under the arrangement is terminated by reason of death or disability, then, in addition to the above, he shall be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to his last full monthly salary multiplied by twelve 12 months.
As per Amendment 20 to the Companies Law, it was decided at the Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders on July 31, 2013, to adopt the Executive Compensation Policy of the Company, which included the above referenced extended notice provisions, and severance payments in the event of termination, with respect to each of Mr. Avi Eizenman and Mr. Shaike Orbach. The Executive Compensation Policy is expected to be brought for shareholders re-approval at our next Annual General Meeting scheduled to convene in June 2016.
63

Board of Directors
Our Articles of Association provide for a board of directors of not less than two and not more than eight members. Each director (except external directors) is elected to serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected. Other officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors. The Articles of Association of the Company provide that any director may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the approval by the Board of Directors, appoint another person to serve as a substitute director and may cancel such appointment. Under the Companies Law, a person who is already serving as a director will not be permitted to act as a substitute director. Additionally, the Companies Law prohibits a person from serving as a substitute director for more than one director. Appointment of a substitute director for a member of a board committee is only permitted if the substitute is a member of the board of directors and does not already serve as a member of such committee. If the committee member being substituted is an external director, the substitute may only be another external director who possesses the same expertise as the external director being substituted. The term of appointment of a substitute director may be for one meeting of the board of directors or for a specified period or until notice is given of the cancellation of the appointment. To our knowledge, no director currently intends to appoint any other person as a substitute director, except if the director is unable to attend a meeting of the board of directors.
External Directors
Under the Companies Law, companies registered under the laws of Israel the shares of which have been offered to the public in or outside of Israel are required to appoint no less than two external directors. No person may be appointed as an external director if such person is a relative (as defined in the Companies Law) of a controlling shareholder or if such person, or the person’s relative, partner, employer or any entity under the person’s control, has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of the person’s appointment to serve as external director, any affiliation with any of either the company, any entity or person controlling, controlled by or under common control with the company, or relatives of such person. The term “affiliation” includes:

| · | an employment relationship;

| · | a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis;

| · | control; and

| · | service as an office holder.

The Israeli Minister of Justice, in consultation with the Israeli Securities Authority, may determine that certain matters will not constitute an affiliation, and has issued certain regulations with respect thereof.
64

If the company does not have a controlling shareholder or a shareholder who holds company shares entitling him to vote at least 25% of the votes in a shareholders meeting, then the company may not appoint as an external director any person or such person’s relative, partner, employer or any entity under the person’s control, who has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of the person’s appointment to serve as external director, any affiliation with the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, a substantial shareholder who holds at least 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of the company or voting rights which entitle him to vote at least 5% of the votes in a shareholders meeting, or the Chief Financial Officer.
A person shall be qualified to serve as an external director only if he or she possesses “expertise in finance and accounting” or “professional qualifications”. At least one external director must possess expertise in finance and accounting.
A director can satisfy the requirements of having “expertise in finance and accounting” if due to his or her education, experience and qualifications he or she has acquired expertise and understanding in business and accounting matters and financial statements, in a manner that allows him or her to understand, in depth, the company’s financial statements and to spur a discussion regarding the manner in which the financial data is presented.
A public company's board of directors must evaluate the proposed external director's expertise in finance and accounting, by considering, among other things, such candidate’s education, experience and knowledge in the following: (i) accounting and auditing issues typical to the field in which the company operates and to companies of a size and complexity similar to such company; (ii) the company's independent public accountant’s duties and obligations; (iii) preparation of the company’s consolidated financial statements and their approval in accordance with the Companies Law and the Israeli Securities Law - 1961.
A director is deemed to be “professionally qualified” if he or she meets any of the following criteria: (i) has an academic degree in any of the following professions: economics, business administration, accounting, law or public administration; (ii) has a different academic degree or has completed higher education in a field that is the company’s main field of operations, or a field relevant to his or her position; or (iii) has at least five years experience in any of the following, or has at least a cumulative total of at least five years experience in any two of the following: (A) a senior position in the business management of a corporation with a significant extent of business, (B) a senior public position or a senior position in public service, or (C) a senior position in the company's main field of operations. As with a candidate’s expertise in finance and accounting, the board of directors here too must evaluate the proposed external director's "professional qualification" in accordance with the criteria set forth above.
65

The declaration required by law to be signed by a candidate to serve as an external director must include a statement by such candidate concerning his or her education and experience, if relevant, in order that the board of directors may properly evaluate whether such candidate meets the requirements of having "expertise in finance and accounting" or being "professionally qualified" as set forth in the regulations. Additionally, the candidate should submit documents and certificates that support the statements set forth in the declaration.
No person may serve as an external director if the person’s position or other business activities create, or may create, a conflict of interest with the person’s responsibilities as an external director or may otherwise interfere with the person’s ability to serve as an external director. Additionally, no person may serve as an external director if the person, the person’s relative, spouse, employer or any entity controlling or controlled by the person, has a business or professional relationship with someone with whom affiliation is prohibited, even if such relationship is not maintained on a regular basis, excepting negligible relationships, or if such person received from the company any compensation as an external director in excess of what is permitted by the Companies Law. Pursuant to the recently enacted amendment to the Companies Regulations (Matters Which do not Constitute Affiliation), 2006, effective as of April 3, 2016 (the "Amendment to the Affiliation Regulations"), business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis between the company and the external director will not constitute affiliation if the relationship commenced after the appointment of the external director for office, the company and the external director consider the relationship to be negligible and the audit committee approved, based on information presented to it, that the relationship is negligible, and the external director declared that he did not know and could not have reasonably know about the formation of the relationship and has no control over its existence or termination. If, at the time external directors are to be appointed, all current members of the board of directors who are not controlling shareholders or relatives of such shareholders are of the same gender, then at least one external director must be of the other gender.
External directors are to be elected for a term of three years by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, provided that either:

| · | the majority includes at least a majority of the shares held by non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who are present and voting at the meeting; or

| · | the total number of shares held by non-controlling and disinterested shareholders that voted against the election of the director does not exceed two percent of the aggregate voting rights in the company.

66

External directors may be re-elected for two additional terms of three years each, provided that with respect to the appointment for each such additional three-year term, one of the following has occurred: (i) the reappointment of the external director has been proposed by one or more shareholders holding together 1% or more of the aggregate voting rights in the company and the appointment was approved at the general meeting of the shareholders by a simple majority, provided that: (1)(a) in calculating the majority, votes of controlling shareholders or shareholders having a personal interest in the appointment as a result of an affiliation with a controlling shareholder and abstentions are disregarded and (b) the total number of shares of shareholders who do not have a personal interest in the appointment as a result of an affiliation with a controlling shareholder and/or who are not controlling shareholders, present and voting in favor of the appointment exceed 2% of the aggregate voting rights in the company, and (2) pursuant to a recently enacted amendment to the Companies Law (“Amendment 22”), effective as of January 10, 2014, the external director who has been nominated in such fashion is not a linked or competing shareholder, and does not have or has not had, on or within the two years preceding the date of such person’s appointment to serve as another term as external director, any affiliation with a linked or competing shareholder. The term “linked or competing shareholder” means the shareholder(s) who nominated the external director for reappointment or a material shareholder of the company holding more than 5% of the shares in the company, provided that at the time of the reappointment, such shareholder(s) of the company, the controlling shareholder of such shareholder(s) of the company, or a company under such shareholder(s) of the company’s control, has a business relationship with the company or are competitors of the company; the Israeli Minister of Justice, in consultation with the Israeli Securities Authority, may determine that certain matters will not constitute a business relationship or competition with the company; (ii) the reappointment of the external director has been proposed by the board of directors and the appointment was approved by the majority of shareholders required for the initial appointment of an external director; or (iii) pursuant to a recently enacted amendment to the Companies Law (“Amendment 26”), effective as of November 25, 2014, the external director has proposed himself for reappointment and the reappointment was approved in accordance with Sub-section (i) above.
However, under regulations promulgated pursuant to the Companies Law, companies whose shares are listed for trading on specified exchanges outside of Israel, including the Nasdaq Global Select, Global and Capital Markets, may elect external directors for additional terms that do not exceed three years each, beyond the three three-year terms generally applicable, provided that, if an external director is being re-elected for an additional term or terms beyond three three-year terms: (i) the audit committee and board of directors must determine that, in light of the external director’s expertise and special contribution to the board of directors and its committees, the re-election for an additional term is to the company’s benefit; (ii) the external director must be re-elected by the required majority of shareholders and subject to the terms specified in the Companies Law; and (iii) the term during which the nominee has served as an external director and the reasons given by the audit committee and board of directors for extending his or her term of office must be presented to the shareholders prior to their approval.
External directors may be removed only by the same percentage of shareholders as is required for their election, or by a court, and then only if the external directors cease to meet the statutory qualifications for their appointment, violate their duty of loyalty to the company or are found by a court to be unable to perform their duties on a full time basis. External directors may also be removed by an Israeli court if they are found guilty of bribery, fraud, administrative offenses in a company or use of inside information. Each committee of a company’s board of directors which has been granted any authority normally reserved for the board of directors must include at least one external director; provided, however, that the audit committee and compensation committee must each include all external directors then serving on the board of directors.
67

Following termination of service as an external director, a public company, a controlling shareholder thereof and any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder, may not grant any benefit, directly or indirectly, to any person who served as an external director of such public company, or to his or her spouse or child, including, not appointing such person, or his or her spouse or child, as an office holder of such public company or of any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder of such public company, not employing such person or his or her spouse or child and not receiving professional services for pay from such person, either directly or indirectly, including through a corporation controlled by such person, all until the lapse of two years from termination of office with respect to the external director, his or her spouse or child; and with respect to other relatives of the former external director - until the lapse of one year from termination of office.
An external director is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with service provided as an external director. At the Annual Shareholders Meeting of the Company held on April 14, 2013, the shareholders of the Company re-elected Mr. Ilan Erez as an external director for second three-year term and elected Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak as an external director for an initial three-year term, with such terms of office for the external directors having commenced as of July 1, 2013. Mr. Ilan Erez and Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak are expected to be brought for re-election as External Directors for a third three-year term and second three-year term, respectively, on the next Annual General Meeting of our shareholders, scheduled to convene in June, 2016.
Audit Committee
The Companies Law requires public companies to appoint an audit committee. The responsibilities of the audit committee pursuant to the Companies Law include identifying irregularities in the management of our business and approving related party transactions as required by law, classifying company transactions as extraordinary transactions or non-extraordinary transactions and as material or non-material transactions in which an officer has an interest (which will have the effect of determining the kind of corporate approvals required for such transaction), assessing the proper function of the company’s internal audit regime and determining whether its internal auditor has the requisite tools and resources required to perform his role and to regulate the company's rules on employee complaints, reviewing the scope of work of the company’s independent accountants and their fees, and implementing a whistleblower protection plan with respect to employee complaints of business irregularities. Pursuant to Amendment 22, effective as of January 10, 2014, the responsibilities of the audit committee under the Companies Law also include the following matters: (i) to establish procedures to be followed in respect of related party transactions with a controlling shareholder (where such are not extraordinary transactions), which may include, where applicable, the establishment of a competitive process for such transaction, under the supervision of the audit committee, or individual, or other committee or body selected by the audit committee, in accordance with criteria determined by the audit committee; and (ii) to determine procedures for approving certain related party transactions with a controlling shareholder, which were determined by the audit committee not to be extraordinary transactions, but which were also determined by the audit committee not to be negligible transactions.
68

Under the Companies Law, an audit committee must consist of at least three directors, including all the external directors of the company, and a majority of the members of the audit committee must be independent or external directors. The Companies Law defines independent directors as either external directors or directors who: (1) meet the requirements of an external director, other than the requirement to possess accounting and financial expertise or professional qualifications, with Audit Committee confirmation of such; (2) have been directors in the company for an uninterrupted duration of less than 9 years (and any interim period during which such person was not a director which is less than 2 years shall not be deemed to interrupt the duration); and, (3) were classified as such by the company.
The following persons may not be a member of the audit committee:

| · | The chairman of the board of directors,

| · | Any director employed by or otherwise providing services to the company or to the controlling shareholder or entity under such controlling shareholder's control,

| · | Any director who derives his salary primarily from a controlling shareholder,

| · | A controlling shareholder, or

| · | Any relative of a controlling shareholder.

According to the Companies Law, (1) the chairman of the audit committee must be an external director, (2) the required quorum for audit committee meetings and decisions is a majority of the committee members, of which the majority of members present must be independent and external directors, and (3) any person who is not eligible to serve on the audit committee is further restricted from participating in its meetings and votes, unless the chairman of the audit committee determines that such person’s presence is necessary in order to present a certain matter, provided however, that company employees who are not controlling shareholders or relatives of such shareholders may be present in the meetings but not for the actual votes, and likewise, company counsel and company secretary who are not controlling shareholders or relatives of such shareholders may be present in the meetings and for the decisions if such presence is requested by the audit committee.
69

Currently, Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak, Mr. Ilan Erez and Mr. Eli Doron serve as members of our audit committee, and Mr. Ilan Erez serves as the chairperson.
Compensation Committee
On December 5, 2010, our board of directors established a compensation committee, composed of at least two directors who were initially Mr. Zohar Zisapel (a former director in the Company), as chairman, and Mr. Avi Eizenman. At the time, its sole function was to recommend, to the board of directors, certain executive compensation matters and any other matters as the board of directors decided from time to time.
In December 2012, Amendment 20 to the Companies Law (“Amendment 20”) went into effect, pursuant to which, the Board of Directors of Israeli publicly traded companies are required to appoint a compensation committee comprised of at least three members, including all external directors, who must also comprise a majority of the members of the compensation committee. In addition, the chairman of the compensation committee must be an external director. Following the compensation committee's recommendations, the Board of Directors is required to establish a compensation policy, which includes a framework for establishing the terms of office and employment of the office holders and guidelines with respect to the structure of the variable pay of office holders. Such guidelines are the basis for adequate balance between the components of compensation, which exists when a linkage is maintained between compensation and performance and the creation of value for shareholders in the Company, while maintaining the Company’s ability to recruit and maintain talented officeholders and incentivizing them to pursue the Company’s objectives. In particular, an appropriate balance between the fixed component (base salary and additional benefits) and the variable component and capital compensation avoids placing an exaggerated emphasis on one component.
The following persons may not be a member of the compensation committee:

| · | The chairman of the board of directors,

| · | Any director employed by or otherwise providing services to the company or to the controlling shareholder or entity under such controlling shareholder's control,

| · | Any director who derives his salary primarily from a controlling shareholder,

| · | A controlling shareholder, or

| · | Any relative of a controlling shareholder.

70

The responsibilities of the compensation committee include the following:

| 1. | To recommend to the Board of Directors as to a compensation policy for officers of the company, as well as to recommend, once every three years to extend the compensation policy subject to receipt of the required corporate approvals;

| 2. | To recommend to the Board of Directors as to any updates to the compensation policy which may be required;

| 3. | To review the implementation of the compensation policy by the Company;

| 4. | To approve transactions relating to terms of office and employment of certain Company office holders, which require the approval of the compensation committee pursuant to the Companies Law; and

| 5. | To exempt, under certain circumstances, a transaction relating to terms of office and employment from the requirement of approval of the shareholders meeting.

In December 2012, our Board of Directors changed the composition of the members of our compensation committee by removing Mr. Avi Eizenman from the compensation committee, and appointing the Company’s two external directors, Mr. Ilan Erez and Ms. Einat Domb-Har to our compensation committee, and appointing Mr. Ilan Erez as chairman of our compensation committee. On July 1, 2013, following the election of Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak as an external director instead of Ms. Einat Domb-Har, Ms. Aya Hayak replaced Ms. Domb-Har on our compensation committee. Following the election of Mr. Eli Doron as a member of our board of directors, Mr. Eli Doron replaced Mr. Zohar Zisapel on our compensation committee. Our compensation committee has been charged by the Board of Directors to act in accordance with the powers and prerogatives delegated to it by the Companies Law and take any decisions and make any recommendations to the Board all as set forth in the Companies Law.
Pursuant to Amendment 27 to the Companies Law, effective as of April 3, 2016 ("Amendment 27"), the audit committee may serve as the company's compensation committee, provided that it meets the composition requirements of the compensation committee.
Under Section 267B(a) and Parts A and B of Annex 1A of the Companies Law, which were legislated as part of Amendment 20, a company’s compensation policy shall be determined based on, and take into account, the following parameters:

| a. | advancement of the goals of the Company, its working plan and its long term policy;

| b. | the creation of proper incentives for the office holders while taking into consideration, inter alia, the Company’s risk management policies;

| c. | the Company’s size and nature of its operations;

| d. | the contributions of the relevant office holders in achieving the goals of the Company and profit in the long term in light of their positions;

| e. | the education, skills, expertise and achievements of the relevant office holders;

| f. | the role of the office holders, areas of their responsibilities and previous agreements with them;

| g. | the correlation of the proposed compensation with the compensation of other employees of the Company, and the effect of such differences in compensation on the employment relations in the company; and

| h. | the long term performance of the office holder.

71

In addition, the compensation policy should take into account that in the event the compensation paid to office holders shall include variable components – it should address the ability of the board of directors to reduce the value of the variable component from time to time or to set a cap on the exercise value of convertible securities components that are not paid out in cash. Additionally, in the event that the terms of office and employment include grants or payments made upon termination – such grants should take into consideration the length of the term of office or period of employment, the terms of employment of the office holder during such period, the company’s success during said period and the office holder’s contribution to obtaining the company’s goals and maximizing its profits as well as the circumstances and context of the termination.
In addition, the compensation policy must set forth standards and rules on the following issues: (a) with respect to variable components of compensation - basing the compensation on long term performance and measurable criteria (though a non-material portion of the variable components can be discretionary awards taking into account the contribution of the officer holder to the company. Pursuant to Amendment 27, variable components in the amount of up to a three month salary of the relevant office holder, on an annual basis, shall be considered a non-material portion of the variable components); (b) establishing the appropriate ratio between variable components and fixed components and placing a cap on such variable components (including a cap on the grant date value of convertible securities components that are not paid out in cash); (c) setting forth a rule requiring an office holder to return amounts paid, in the event that it is later revealed that such amounts were paid on the basis of data which prove to be erroneous and resulted in an amendment and restatement of the company’s financial statements; (d) determining minimum holding or vesting periods for equity based variable components of compensation, while taking into consideration appropriate long term incentives; and (e) setting a cap on grants or benefits paid upon termination.
The board of directors of a company is obligated to adopt a compensation policy after considering the recommendations of the compensation committee. The final adoption of the compensation committee is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the company, which such approval is subject to certain special majority requirements, as set forth in the Israeli Companies Law, pursuant to which one of the following must be met:

| (i) | the majority of the votes includes at least a majority of all the votes of shareholders who are not controlling shareholders of the company or who do not have a personal interest in the compensation policy and participating in the vote; abstentions shall not be included in the total of the votes of the aforesaid shareholders; or

| (ii) | the total of opposing votes from among the shareholders described in subsection (i) above does not exceed 2% of all the voting rights in the company.

72

Nonetheless, even if the shareholders of the company do not approve the compensation policy, the board of directors of a company may approve the compensation policy, provided that the compensation committee and, thereafter, the board of directors determined, based on detailed, documented, reasons and after a second review of the compensation policy, that the approval of the compensation policy is for the benefit of the company.
Executive Compensation Policy
On July 31, 2013, an Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders of the Company took place, approving the Executive Compensation Policy (the “Policy”), which had been recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors, for the Company’s directors and office holders, in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law. The Policy is expected to be brought for re-approval of our shareholder at the next Annual General Meeting of our shareholders, scheduled to convene in June, 2016.
The Policy includes, among other issues prescribed by the Companies Law, a framework for establishing the terms of office and employment of the office holders, a recoupment policy, and guidelines with respect to the structure of the variable pay of office holders.
Each of our compensation committee and board of directors may engage compensation advisors and other professionals to assist in formulating compensation packages in line with the Policy, including, without limitation, to assist in collecting relevant data, framing the appropriate factors to be considered and evaluating the different factors being considered.
All compensation arrangements of office holders are to be approved in the manner prescribed by applicable law. Our office holders, including External Directors or Independent Directors, may waive their entitlement to their compensation, subject to applicable law.
Our recoupment policy relating to office holder compensation allows for the recovery of all or a portion of any compensation paid to our office holders that was paid during the previous three years on the basis of financial data included in our financial statements in any fiscal year that were found to be inaccurate and were subsequently restated. In such event, we will seek reimbursement from the office holders to the extent such office holders would not have been entitled to all or a portion of such compensation, based on the financial data included in the restated financial statements. Our compensation committee will be responsible for approving the amounts to be recouped and for setting terms for such recoupment from time to time. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, the recoupment policy will not be triggered in the event of a financial restatement due to changes in the applicable reporting or accounting standards. The above noted recoupment policy does not derogate from any relevant recoupment or clawback provisions under any applicable law or regulatory rules which apply to us.
73

All of our office holders (other than non-employee directors) may be incentivized through cash bonuses and long-term equity-based incentives to provide the office holder with a stake in our success – thus linking the office holder’s long-term financial interests with the interests of our shareholders. In accordance with the Policy, the incentives are developed through a program that sets performance targets based on each office holder’s role and scope. Actual payments are driven by the business and individual performance vis-à-vis the performance targets set at the beginning of the year. The formula for the performance targets and the maximum variable components payable to each office holder (other than directors) shall be presented and recommended by our Chief Executive Officer and reviewed and approved by our compensation committee and our board of directors. The formula for the performance targets and the maximum variable components payable to any employee office holders who are also directors shall be presented and recommended by our compensation committee and reviewed and approved by our board of directors and our shareholders. The maximum value of the variable compensation components for an office holder at the Company shall not exceed eighty percent of such office holder’s total compensation package on an annual basis. The maximum annual value of the equity-based long-term compensation components and cash bonuses of all of our office holders shall not exceed two percent of our market cap.
Unless otherwise specified in the terms of the variable compensation of an office holder, our Policy dictates that the board of directors shall not have discretion to unilaterally reduce such office holder's variable compensation. Equity based compensation may be granted in any form permitted under our equity incentive plans, as in effect from time to time (collectively, the "Equity Incentive Plans"), including stock options, restricted share units and restricted stock. Equity grants to office holders shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Equity Incentive Plans. All equity-based incentives granted to our office holders shall be subject to vesting periods in order to promote long-term retention of the awarded office holders. Unless determined otherwise in a specific award agreement approved by the compensation committee and the board of directors, grants to our office holders other than directors shall vest gradually over a period of between two to four years. We do not have any equity ownership guidelines that require any of our office holders to hold a stated number or fixed percentage of our ordinary shares, nor do they have to continue to hold for any period of time shares in the Company which they acquired as a result of the exercise of fully vested equity grants. The value of the equity-based compensation shall be calculated on the grant date, according to acceptable valuation practices at the time of grant. The board of directors shall not have discretion to limit the value of the equity-based compensation at the time of exercise. The board of directors may, following approval by our compensation committee, extend the period of time for which an award to an office holder is to remain exercisable, or make provisions with respect to the acceleration of the vesting period of any office holder’s awards, including, without limitation, in connection with a corporate transaction involving a change of control.
74

Our compensation committee will periodically review the Policy and monitor its implementation, and recommend to our board of directors and shareholders to amend the Policy as it deems necessary from time to time. The term of the Policy shall be three years as of the date of its adoption on July 31, 2013, during which, the Board of Directors is required to examine the Policy and revise it from time to time, if the circumstances under which it had been adopted have materially changed. Following such three year term, the Policy, including any revisions recommended by our compensation committee and approved by our board of directors, as applicable, will be brought once again to the shareholders for approval.
Internal Auditor
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public company must appoint an internal auditor, who is nominated by the audit committee. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other matters, whether our actions comply with the law and orderly business procedure. Under the Companies Law, the internal auditor may be an employee of the company but not an office holder (as defined in Item 10 below), nor an affiliate, nor a relative of an office holder or affiliate, and he or she may not be our independent accountant or its representative. Doron Cohen of Fahn Kaneh Control Management Ltd. (a subsidiary of Fahn Kanne & Co. - Grant Thornton Israel) serves as our internal auditor.
D. Employees
The number of employees over the last three financial years is set forth in the table below.

As of December 31 |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
Total Employees |  |  | 143 |  |  |  | 197 |  |  |  | 238 |
Marketing, Sales, Customer Services |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 26 |
Research & Development |  |  | 41 |  |  |  | 66 |  |  |  | 81 |
Manufacturing |  |  | 75 |  |  |  | 97 |  |  |  | 114 |
Corporate Operations and Administration |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 17 |

As of March 31, 2016, we had 237 employees, including 25 in marketing, sales and customer services, 83 in research and development, 113 in manufacturing, and 16 in corporate operations and administration. All such employees, except for 23 employees of our subsidiaries in the United States and 29 of our subsidiary in Denmark, are based in Israel. We consider our relations with our employees excellent and have never experienced a labor dispute, strike or work stoppage. None of our employees is represented by a labor union. We do not employ a significant number of temporary employees, but we do use temporary employees from time to time, as necessary.
75

In Israel we are subject to certain labor statutes and national labor court precedent rulings, as well as to certain provisions of the collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut (General Federation of Labor in Israel) and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations including the Industrialists' Associations. These provisions of collective bargaining agreements are applicable to our Israeli employees by virtue of expansion orders issued in accordance with relevant labor laws by the Israeli Ministry of Labor and Welfare, and which apply such agreement provisions to our employees even though they are not directly part of a union that has signed a collective bargaining agreement. The laws and labor court rulings that apply to our employees principally concern the minimum wage laws, procedures for dismissing employees, determination of severance pay, leaves of absence (such as annual vacation or maternity leave), sick pay and other conditions for employment. The expansion orders which apply to our employees principally concern the requirement for length of the work day and workweek, mandatory contributions to a pension fund, annual recreation allowance, travel expenses payment and other conditions of employment. We generally provide our employees with benefits and working conditions beyond the required minimums.
Israeli law generally requires severance pay, which may be funded by managers' insurance and/or a pension fund described below, upon the retirement or death of an employee or termination of employment without cause (as defined in the law). The payments to the managers’ insurance and/or pension fund in respect of severance pay amount to approximately 8.33% of an employee’s wages, in the aggregate. Furthermore, Israeli employees and employers are required to pay predetermined sums to the National Insurance Institute, which is similar to the United States Social Security Administration. Such amounts also include payments for national health insurance. The payments to the National Insurance Institute are equal to approximately 14.25% of an employee’s wages, of which the employee contributes approximately 49% and the employer contributes approximately 51%.
A general practice followed by us, is the contribution of funds on behalf of most of our employees either to a fund known as managers' insurance or to a pension fund, or to a combination of both. Such practice was further reinforced in July 1, 2008, when we entered into agreements with a majority of its employees in order to implement Section 14 to the Severance Pay Law, according to which the payment of monthly deposits by us into managers’ insurance and/or pension fund are in respect of severance obligation to such employees. See Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements. These funds provide a combination of savings plan, insurance and severance pay benefits to the employee, giving the employee a lump sum payment upon retirement and securing the severance pay or part of it, if legally entitled, upon termination of employment. Each employee contributes an aggregate amount equal to between 5% and 5.5% of his base salary to such funds, and we contribute, in the aggregate, between 13.3% and 15.8% of the employee’s base salary, with such amount including the 8.33% which is contributed as severance pay as noted above.
76

E. Share Ownership
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2016, the number of shares owned by our officers, directors and senior management. The percentages shown are based on 7,311,563 ordinary shares outstanding as of March 31, 2016:

Name and Address |  | Number of Shares and Options Owned 1 |  |  | Percent of Outstanding Shares |
Zohar Zisapel2, 3 |  |  | 1,511,722 |  |  |  | 20.68 | %
Avi Eizenmann |  |  | 247,618 |  |  |  | 3.37 | %
Shaike Orbach |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |
Eli Doron |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |
Ayelet Aya Hayak |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |
Ilan Erez |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |
Eran Gilad |  |  | * |  |  |  | * |
All directors and officers as a group |  |  | 1,759,340 |  |  |  | 23.92 | %

* Denotes ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares.

1 | The table above includes the number of shares and options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Ordinary shares subject to these options are deemed beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the ownership percentage of the person or group holding these options, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the ownership percentage of any other person. Except where otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, based on information furnished to us by such owners or otherwise disclosed in any public filings, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

2 | Based on Schedule 13D/A filed on March 5, 2009.

3 | Zohar Zisapel ceased serving as a director in the Company as of July 28, 2015.

See also “Item 6. Directors and Senior Management – Compensation.”
77

Item 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
The shareholders of the Company who beneficially own over 5% or more of each class of shares, as well as the number of shares owned and the percentage of outstanding shares owned by each, and additional information, is set forth below. The voting rights of our major shareholders do not differ from the voting rights of other holders of our ordinary shares. All of the information with respect to beneficial ownership of the Ordinary Shares is given to the best of our knowledge.

Name of Shareholder |  | Number of Shares and Options Owned 1 |  |  | Percentage of Outstanding Shares |
Zohar Zisapel2 |  |  | 1,511,722 |  |  |  | 20.68 | %
Dov Yelin/Yair Lapidot/Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd.3 |  |  | 552,712 |  |  |  | 7.56 | %
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd.4 |  |  | 415,898 |  |  |  | 5.69 | %

1 | The table above includes the number of shares and options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Ordinary shares subject to these options are deemed beneficially owned for the purpose of computing the ownership percentage of the person or group holding these options, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the ownership percentage of any other person. Except where otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, based on information furnished to us by such owners or otherwise disclosed in any public filings, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

2 Based on Schedule 13D/A filed on March 5, 2009.

3 | As reported on the Schedules 13G/A filed by each of Dov Yelin, Yair Laipdot and Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd., an Israeli investment management firm (collectively, “Yelin Lapidot”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2016, and as further updated in correspondence by Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd. with the Company, dated as of March 31, 2016, all 552,712 ordinary shares of the Company are beneficially owned by Yelin Lapidot via two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Subsidiaries”), Yelin Lapidot Provident Funds Management Ltd. which holds 248,024 Ordinary Shares of the Company, and Yelin Lapidot – Mutual Funds Management Ltd. which holds 304,688 Ordinary Shares of the Company. Yelin Lapidot has reported on the Schedules 13G/A that: (i) Messrs. Yelin and Lapidot each own 24.38% of the share capital and 25% of the voting rights, and are responsible for the day-to-day management, of Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd., (ii) the Subsidiaries operate under independent management and make their own independent voting and investment decisions, (iii) that any economic interest or beneficial ownership in any of the Ordinary Shares of the Company covered by the report on Schedule 13G is held for the benefit of the members of the provident funds or mutual funds, as the case may be, and (iv) the report on Schedule 13G/A shall not be construed as an admission by Messrs. Yelin and Lapidot, Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd. or the Subsidiaries that he or it is the beneficial owner of any of the Ordinary Shares of the Company covered by report on Schedule 13G/A, and that each of them disclaims beneficial ownership of any such ordinary shares of the Company.

4 | As reported on the Schedule 13G/A filed by Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services Ltd. ("Harel"), an Israeli insurance company publicly traded on the TASE, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 2016, of the 415,898 Ordinary Shares (i) 405,495 are held for members of the public through, among others, provident funds and/or pension funds and/or index-linked securities and/or insurance policies, which are managed by subsidiaries of Harel, each of which subsidiaries operates under independent management and makes independent voting and investment decisions, and (ii) 10,403 Ordinary Shares are beneficially held for Harel's own account. Harel also reported that the report on Schedule 13G/A shall not be construed as an admission by Harel that it is the beneficial owner of more than 10,403 ordinary shares of the Company covered by the report on Schedule 13G/A.

78

The Company's major shareholders do not have different voting rights.
As of March 31, 2016, there were approximately 5 record holders of ordinary shares, including approximately 2 record holders in the United States. Collectively, these 2 record holders in the United States held less than 1% of the outstanding ordinary shares.
B. Related Party Transactions
Messrs. Yehuda and Zohar Zisapel are brothers and are our founders. On July 15, 2010 Mr. Yehuda Zisapel resigned from serving as director on our board of directors. On September 2, 2010, Mr. Zohar Zisapel was appointed as a director on our board until July 28, 2015, when he ceased serving as a director. Messrs. Yehuda and Zohar Zisapel are also founders, directors and principal shareholders of several other corporations within the “Rad Group”, as described in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.
There are other members of the Rad Group that are actively engaged in designing, manufacturing, marketing and supporting data communications products, none of which are currently the same as our products. Certain products of members of the Rad Group are complementary to, and may be used in connection with, our products.
The Rad Group provides us with certain services, and is reimbursed by us for the costs of providing such services. During 2015, we purchased from the Rad Group internet services for an amount of up to $51,500, testing services for our products for an amount of up to $147,000, car leasing services for an amount of up to $6,000 and insurance services for an amount of up to $55,000. We also sub-lease office space in Paramus, New Jersey, for an amount of up to $24,000 (monthly rent payments of approximately $2,000) from Radcom Equipment, Inc., an affiliated company of the Rad Group. We began to sub-lease this space in February 2004; the sub-lease was in effect until January 31, 2006 and was renewed for additional one-year periods through December 31, 2014. On January 1, 2015, we extended the sub-lease for an additional two-year period until December 31, 2016.
79

During 2015, we sold external bypass switches and Server Adapters to members of the Rad Group for an amount of approximately $1,154,000.
The material terms of the arrangements with the Rad Group, described in the preceding paragraphs, occur within the Company's ordinary course of business, and on market terms. We believe that such arrangements are neither material to us nor unusual in their nature or conditions. We further believe that the terms of the transactions in which we have engaged and are currently engaged with other members of the Rad Group are generally no less favorable to us than terms which might be available to us from unaffiliated third parties.
Our board of directors approved a resolution under which sales to or purchases from any members of the Rad Group must meet certain criteria or otherwise be specifically approved by the relevant corporate bodies, as applicable in accordance with Israeli law. These criteria included a stipulation that transactions between us and members of the Rad Group relate to standard equipment, services and products purchased or sold by us and the Rad Group, as applicable. Our board of directors approved sales to or purchases from the Rad Group, from time to time, of standard equipment, services and products, which are (i) within our ordinary course of business and (ii) at least at market terms and at a value lower than 0.5% of our annual turnover per transaction and 2.5% of our annual turnover for all such transactions in a financial year, aggregated together. Our management is required to examine on a quarterly basis whether transactions with the Rad Group comply with such criteria. Transactions which do not meet the criteria will require specific corporate approvals in the applicable manner prescribed by Israeli law. Further, all future related party transactions and arrangements (or modifications of existing ones) with members of the Rad Group, transactions in which office holders of the Company have a personal interest, or transactions which raise issues of such office holders’ fiduciary duties, could require additional corporate approvals as applicable under the Companies Law.
Except as indicated above, we do not currently directly compete with other members of the Rad Group and do not currently contemplate engaging in competition with any other member of the Rad Group in the future. However, opportunities to develop, manufacture or sell new products (or otherwise enter new fields) may arise in the future, which opportunities might be pursued by us or by one or more other members of the Rad Group to the exclusion of (or in competition with) other members of the Rad Group (including us). In the event that any such opportunity arises, the directors then in office will determine whether or not we should seek to pursue it. Any such determination will be based upon such factors as the directors then deem relevant. However, in making any such determination, the directors will be bound by their fiduciary duties to the Company (and to any other corporation or other person to whom they then owe a fiduciary duty).
80

On July 22, 2002, our audit committee and the Board of Directors approved an Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers. Our shareholders approved the terms of this agreement in a General and Extraordinary Meeting held on January 7, 2004. In Amendment 3 to the Companies Law, effective as of 2005, the instances in which a company may indemnify its officers and directors were broadened. In December 2007 each of our audit committee and Board of Directors approved a new form of Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers so as to reflect this amendment. Our shareholders approved the terms of this new Indemnification Agreement in January 2008. According to Amendment 16 to the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968 (the "Israeli Securities Law"), and to a corresponding amendment to the Companies Law, both effective as of 2011, the Israeli Securities Authority is authorized to impose administrative sanctions against companies like ours and their office holders for certain violations of the Israeli Securities Law or the Companies Law. These sanctions include monetary sanctions and certain restrictions on serving as a director or senior officer of a public company for certain periods of time. The Israeli Securities Law and the Companies Law provide that only certain types of such liabilities may be reimbursed by indemnification and insurance. Specifically, legal expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by an individual in the applicable administrative enforcement proceeding and certain compensation payable to injured parties for damages suffered by them are permitted to be reimbursed via indemnification or insurance, provided that such indemnification and insurance are authorized by the company's articles of association, and receive the requisite corporate approvals. In January 2012 each of our audit committee and Board of Directors approved a new form of Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers so as to reflect this amendment, and our shareholders approved these amendments to the Articles of Association and a revised form of Indemnification Agreement for directors at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders held on April 11, 2012.
The Indemnification Agreement provides that our directors and officers will be exempt from liability in certain circumstances. The Indemnification Agreement also provides for the indemnification by the Company for certain obligations and expenses imposed on the officer in connection with act performed in his or her capacity as an officer of the Company. This right to indemnification is limited, and does not cover, among other things, a breach of an officer’s duty of loyalty, a willful breach of an officer’s duty of care, or a reckless disregard for the circumstances or consequences of a breach of a duty of care. The right to indemnification also does not cover acts that are taken intentionally to unlawfully realize personal gain. The maximum amount of our liability under these Indemnification Agreements for any monetary obligation imposed on an officer or a director in favor of another person by a judgment is currently $3,000,000 for each instance of a covered scenario. In addition we would be liable to indemnify the officer or director for all reasonable litigation expenses with respect to certain proceedings. We have maintained liability insurance for our directors and officers. On September 23, 2007 our shareholders approved the procurement of a policy, which provides for total coverage of up to $4,000,000. All of our directors are parties to our Indemnification Agreements and are covered by our directors and officers insurance policy.
81

As per Amendment 20, it was decided on July 31, 2013, at the Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders to adopt the Executive Compensation Policy of the Company, which was recommended by our compensation committee and approved by our board of directors. Our approved Executive Compensation Policy includes the above referenced form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into by the Company with our directors and officers serving in such capacities from time to time, as well as the above referenced directors and officers liability insurance policy. Under the Executive Compensation Policy, any change to the Indemnification Agreement or the insurance policy, including the cost and/or any changes which materially depart from the key terms of the current agreement and/or insurance policy (provided that such changes apply equally to all executives of the Company, including directors) will be submitted to the Company’s compensation committee and the board of directors for their approval but shall not, unless required by law or the Company’s Articles of Association, be presented at a General Meeting of the shareholders.
See also “Item 6. Directors and Senior Management – Compensation.”
Item 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Our consolidated financial statements and other financial information are included herein on pages F-1 through F-44.
A1. See Item 18 for our consolidated financial statements.
A2. See Item 18 for our consolidated financial statements, which cover the last three financial years.
A3. See page F-3 for the audit report of our accountants, entitled “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
A4. Not applicable.
A5. Not applicable.
A6. See Note 12A to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report for the geographic distribution of our sales based on the location of the customer.
A7. Litigation
82

On March 2, 2012 Internet Machines LLC, a Texas limited liability company filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Court”) against numerous defendants (including many switch manufacturers) with respect to certain patents for switches, and included our US subsidiary amongst the list of defendants named in such lawsuit. The lawsuit claimed that the defendants infringed certain patents purported to be owned by Internet Machines LLC and sought unspecified compensation for damages as well as injunctive relief. The defendants filed answers and counterclaims to the complaint asserting that they did not infringe any claims of the asserted patents and the claims of the patents were invalid and/or unenforceable. While one of our switch suppliers (which was also named as a defendant in the aforesaid lawsuit) agreed to indemnify us with respect to certain liabilities, there was no certainty that we would have been ultimately able to collect all or any amounts under such indemnity should we would have been found liable under the lawsuit. On September 4, 2012, the Court granted the defendants' motion to stay the pending litigation and on April 28, 2015, the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice by the Court.
Other than the above, we are not a party to any material litigation and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that would have a material adverse effect on us or our business.
A8. Dividend Policy
Prior to 2013, we had not paid dividends in the past. On January 14, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors has adopted a policy for distributing dividends, subject to all applicable laws. According to this policy, each year we will distribute a dividend of up to 50% of our annual distributable profits. As part of the stated policy, the Company's Board of Directors reserves the right to declare additional dividend distributions, to change the rate of dividend distributions (either as a policy or on a one-time basis), to cancel a specific distribution or to cancel the policy as a whole at any time, at its sole discretion. The actual distribution of a dividend will be subject to meeting the conditions required by applicable law, including the distribution tests set forth in Section 302 of the Companies Law, and to the specific decision of the Company's Board of Directors for each distribution. Future dividend policy will be reviewed by the Board of Directors based upon conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors. Our ability to pay cash dividends may be restricted by instruments governing any of our obligations.
Dividends paid by an Israeli company to shareholders residing outside Israel are generally subject to withholding of Israeli income tax at a rate of 25-30%. Such tax rates apply unless a lower rate is provided in a treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence. In our case, the applicable withholding tax rate will also depend on the particular Israeli production facilities that have generated the earnings that are the source of the specific dividend and, accordingly, the applicable rate may change from time to time.
On March 18, 2013 our Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $0.55 per share which was paid on April 17, 2013 to shareholders of record as of April 4, 2013, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $3.9 million for 2012.
83

On March 18, 2014 our Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $1.00 per share payable on April 17, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 3, 2014, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.2 million for 2013.
On March 23, 2015 our Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $1.00 per share payable on April 21, 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 6, 2015, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.3 million for 2014.
On March 21, 2016 our Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $1.00 per share payable on April 14, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 4, 2016, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.3 million for 2015.
B. Significant Changes
Since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report, no significant changes have occurred.
Item 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. Offer and listing details
Markets and Share Price History
Following our delisting from trading on the TASE, the only trading market for our ordinary shares is the NASDAQ Global Select Market, where our shares have been listed and traded under the symbol SILC since January 2, 2014. Prior thereto our shares were listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Market (previously NASDAQ National Market) under the symbol SILC (previously SILCF) from February 11, 2008. Prior thereto, our shares were listed and traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market (previously known as the NASDAQ Small-Cap).
The table below sets forth the high and low reported sales prices in dollars of our ordinary shares, as reported by NASDAQ during the indicated periods:

PERIOD |  | LOW |  |  | HIGH |
LAST 6 CALENDAR MONTHS |  |  |  |  |  |
March 2016 |  |  | 29.9 |  |  |  | 34.2 |
February 2016 |  |  | 26.15 |  |  |  | 30.39 |
January 2016 |  |  | 26.94 |  |  |  | 33.82 |
December 2015 |  |  | 25.00 |  |  |  | 30.59 |
November 2015 |  |  | 26.81 |  |  |  | 33.1 |
October 2015 |  |  | 25.72 |  |  |  | 33.96 |
FINANCIAL QUARTERS DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
First Quarter 2016 |  |  | 26.15 |  |  |  | 30.39 |
Fourth Quarter 2015 |  |  | 25.00 |  |  |  | 33.96 |
Third Quarter 2015 |  |  | 24.86 |  |  |  | 37.24 |
Second Quarter 2015 |  |  | 34.8 |  |  |  | 44.54 |
First Quarter 2015 |  |  | 32.15 |  |  |  | 48.43 |
Fourth Quarter 2014 |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 38.11 |
Third Quarter 2014 |  |  | 26.02 |  |  |  | 42.45 |
Second Quarter 2014 |  |  | 41.11 |  |  |  | 63.91 |
FIVE MOST RECENT FULL FINANCIAL YEARS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2015 |  |  | 24.86 |  |  |  | 48.43 |
2014 |  |  | 26.00 |  |  |  | 73.44 |
2013 |  |  | 33.84 |  |  |  | 46.15 |
2012 |  |  | 15.02 |  |  |  | 18.50 |
2011 |  |  | 13.10 |  |  |  | 19.33 |

84

On December 27, 2005, our shares commenced trading on the TASE in Israel under the symbol “SILC” (in Hebrew letters). On October 26, 2015, our Board of Directors resolved to act to delist the Company’s shares from trading on the TASE. The last trading day in our shares on the TASE was January 26, 2016, and on January 28, 2016, our shares were delisted from trading on the TASE. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices, in NIS, of the ordinary shares on the TASE, until delisted from trading as set forth above:

PERIOD |  | LOW |  |  | HIGH |
LAST SIX CALENDAR MONTHS1 |  |  |  |  |  |
January 20161 |  |  | 125.00 |  |  |  | 169.00 |
December 2015 |  |  | 97.08 |  |  |  | 116.00 |
November 2015 |  |  | 104.5 |  |  |  | 127.60 |
October 2015 |  |  | 102.00 |  |  |  | 131.10 |
September 2015 |  |  | 101.3 |  |  |  | 113.8 |
August 2015 |  |  | 96.01 |  |  |  | 109.5 |
FINANCIAL QUARTERS DURING THE PAST TWO YEARS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
First Quarter 20161 |  |  | 125.00 |  |  |  | 169.00 |
Fourth Quarter 2015 |  |  | 97.08 |  |  |  | 131.10 |
Third Quarter 2015 |  |  | 96.01 |  |  |  | 141.60 |
Second Quarter 2015 |  |  | 134.90 |  |  |  | 178.30 |
First Quarter 2015 |  |  | 125.00 |  |  |  | 189.60 |
Fourth Quarter 2014 |  |  | 100.50 |  |  |  | 149.70 |
Third Quarter 2014 |  |  | 89.74 |  |  |  | 144.00 |
Second Quarter 2014 |  |  | 142.00 |  |  |  | 223.50 |
FIVE MOST RECENT FULL FINANCIAL YEARS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
2015 |  |  | 96.01 |  |  |  | 189.60 |
2014 |  |  | 89.74 |  |  |  | 257.20 |
2013 |  |  | 66.50 |  |  |  | 166.60 |
2012 |  |  | 51.60 |  |  |  | 73.00 |
2011 |  |  | 44.16 |  |  |  | 80.64 |

(1) Until January 28, 2016, when the Company's shares were delisted from trading on the TASE in accordance with the Company's initiated delisting procedure.
85

Item 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share Capital
Not applicable
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
Articles of Association
Our shareholders approved our Amended and Restated Articles of Association (“Articles”) on January 24, 2008, as well as certain additional amendments to the Articles on April 11, 2012. Our objective as stated in the Articles is to carry on any business and perform any act which is not prohibited by law.
We have currently outstanding only one class of shares, our Ordinary Shares, having a nominal value of NIS 0.01 per share. Holders of Ordinary Shares have one vote per share, and are entitled to participate equally in the payment of dividends and share distributions and, in the event of a liquidation of the Company, in the distribution of assets after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors. No preferred shares are currently authorized.
86

Our Articles require that we hold our annual general meeting of shareholders each year no later than 15 months from the last annual meeting, at a time and place, either within or without the State of Israel, determined by the board of directors, upon 21 days’ prior notice to our shareholders or 35 days’ prior notice to the extent required with respect to certain matters as required under the regulations to the Companies Law. In general, no business may be commenced at a general meeting until a quorum of two or more shareholders holding at least 33 1/3% of the voting rights is present in person or by proxy. Shareholders may vote in person or by proxy.
In general, a simple majority is required to amend our articles of association.
Pursuant to the Israeli Companies Law, resolutions regarding the following matters must be passed at a general meeting of shareholders:

| · | appointment or termination of our auditors;

| · | appointment and dismissal of external directors;

| · | approval of interested party acts and transactions requiring general meeting approval as provided in sections 255 and 268 to 275 of the Israeli Companies Law;

| · | a merger as provided in section 320(a) of the Israeli Companies Law;

| · | the exercise of the powers of the board of directors, if the board of directors is unable to exercise its powers and the exercise of any of its powers is vital for our proper management, as provided in section 52(a) of the Israeli Companies Law;

| · | amendments to our articles of association;

| · | approval of an increase or decrease of the registered share capital.

An extraordinary general meeting may be convened by demand of two directors or by written request of one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued share capital and 1% of the voting rights or one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of the voting rights. Shareholders requesting a special meeting must include in their request all relevant information, including the reason that such subject is proposed to be brought before the special meeting.
Our ordinary shares may generally be freely transferred under our amended and restated articles of association, unless the transfer is restricted or prohibited by applicable law or the rules of the stock exchange on which the shares are traded. The ownership or voting of our ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in any way by our amended and restated articles of association or the laws of the State of Israel, except under certain circumstances for ownership by nationals of certain countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.
The Companies Law
We are subject to the provisions of the Companies Law. The Companies Law codifies the fiduciary duties that “office holders,” including directors and executive officers, owe to a company. An office holder, as defined in the Companies Law, is a general manager (also referred to as the “chief executive officer”), chief business manager, deputy general manager, vice general manager, executive Vice-President, Vice-President, any other person assuming the responsibilities of any of the foregoing positions without regard to such person's title, as well as a director, or another manager directly subordinate to the general manager. Each person listed in the table in “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees” above is an office holder of Silicom.
87

The Companies Law requires that an office holder of a company promptly disclose, no later than the first board meeting in which such transaction is discussed, any personal interest that he or she may have and all related material information known to him or her, in connection with any existing or proposed transaction by the company. In addition, if the transaction is an extraordinary transaction, the office holder must also disclose any personal interest held by the office holder’s relative (which includes for these purposes any members of his/her (or his/her spouse's) immediate family or the spouses of any such members of his or her (or his/her spouse's) immediate family), or by any corporation in which the office holder or the office holder’s relative is a 5% or greater shareholder, holder of 5% or more of the voting power, director or general manager or in which he or she has the right to appoint at least one director or the general manager. An extraordinary transaction is defined as a transaction not in the ordinary course of business, not on market terms, or that is likely to have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
In the case of a transaction in which an office holder of the company has a personal interest and which is not an extraordinary transaction, after the office holder complies with the above disclosure requirement, board approval is required unless the articles of association of the company provide otherwise. The transaction must be for the benefit of the company. If the transaction is an extraordinary transaction, then, in addition to any approval required by the articles of association, it must also be approved by the audit committee and by the board of directors, and, under specified circumstances, by a meeting of the shareholders, as well.
Subject to certain exceptions provided for in the regulations to the Companies Law, agreements regarding directors’ terms of compensation require the approval of the compensation committee, board of directors and the shareholders of the company. The transaction must be for the benefit of the company.
In matters concerning an extraordinary transaction in which a person has a personal interest, as well as matters concerning his or her terms of compensation, he or she shall not be permitted to vote on the matter or be present in the audit committee or board of directors meeting in which the matter is considered, however, with respect to an office holder, he/she may be present at the meeting discussions if the chairman determines that the presence of the office holder is necessary in order to present the matter. However, if a majority of the audit committee or of the board of directors has a personal interest in the matter then:

| · | all of the directors are permitted to vote on the matter and attend the meeting in which the matter is considered; and

| · | the matter requires approval of the shareholders at a general meeting.

According to the Companies Law, the personal interest disclosure requirements discussed above also apply to a controlling shareholder of a public company. Such requirements also apply to certain shareholders of a public company who have a personal interest in the adoption by the shareholders of certain proposals with respect to (i) certain private placements that will increase their relative holdings in the company, (ii) certain special tender offers or forced bring along share purchase transactions, (iii) election of external directors, (iv) approval of a compensation policy governing the terms of employment and compensation of office holders, (v) approval of the terms of employment and compensation of the general manager, (vi) approval of the terms of employment and compensation of office holders of the company when such terms deviate from the compensation policy previously approved by the company’s shareholders, and (vii) approving the appointment of either (1) the chairman of the board or his/her relative as the chief executive officer of the company, or (2) the chief executive officer or his/her relative as the chairman of the board of directors of the company. If any shareholder casting a vote at a shareholders meeting in connection with such proposals as aforesaid does not notify the company if he, she or it has a personal interest with respect to such proposal, his, her or its vote with respect to the proposal will be disqualified.
88

The term “controlling shareholder” is defined as a shareholder who has the ability to direct the activities of a company, other than if this power derives solely from the shareholder’s position on the board of directors or any other position with the company, and the definition of "controlling shareholder" in connection with matters governing: (i) extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, (ii) certain private placements in which the controlling shareholder has a personal interest, (iii) certain transactions with a controlling shareholder or relative with respect to services provided to or employment by the company, (iv) the terms of employment and compensation of the general manager, and (v) the terms of employment and compensation of office holders of the company when such terms deviate from the compensation policy previously approved by the company’s shareholders, also includes shareholders that hold 25% or more of the voting rights if no other shareholder owns more than 50% of the voting rights in the company (and the holdings of two or more shareholders which each have a personal interest in such matter will be aggregated for the purposes of determining such threshold).
In general, extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, and agreements relating to non-office holder employment and compensation terms of a controlling shareholder (or a relative of such) or to the provision of services to the company by such controlling shareholder (or relative of such), require the approval of the audit committee, the board of directors and the shareholders of the company. Agreements relating to the terms of office and employment of a controlling shareholder (or relative of such) as an office holder in the company require the approval of the compensation committee, the board of directors and the shareholders of the company.
The shareholder approval for such matters requiring shareholder disclosure of a personal interest as noted above, generally must either include at least a majority of the shares held by non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who actively participate in the voting process (without taking abstaining votes into account), or, alternatively, the total shareholdings of the non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who vote against the transaction must not represent more than two percent of the voting rights in the company. The shareholder approval for approving the appointment of either (1) the chairman of the board or his/her relative as the chief executive officer of the company, or (2) the chief executive officer or his/her relative as the chairman of the board of directors of the company, must either include at least two-thirds of the shares held by non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who actively participate in the voting process (without taking abstaining votes into account), or, alternatively, the total shareholdings of the non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who vote against the transaction must not represent more than two percent of the voting rights in the company. Agreements and extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, or agreements relating to any employment terms of a controlling shareholder (or relative if such) or to the provision of services to the company by such controlling shareholder (or relative if such), as aforesaid, with duration exceeding three years, are subject to re-approval once every three years by the audit committee (or compensation committee, as applicable), the board of directors and the shareholders of the company. Extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest may be approved in advance for a period exceeding three years if the audit committee determines such approval reasonable under the circumstances. In addition, agreements and extraordinary transactions with duration exceeding three years which were approved prior to Amendment 16 to the Companies Law, which was passed by the Israeli legislature, the Knesset, in March 2011 and which came into effect gradually during the year 2011 (the “Amendment 16”) will need to be re-approved by the proper corporate actions at the later of (i) the first general meeting held after May 14, 2011, (ii) November 14, 2011 or (iii) the expiration of three years from the date on which they were originally approved, even though they were properly approved prior to the passing of the Amendment 16.
89

The board of directors of an Israeli company whose shares or debentures are publicly traded is obligated to adopt a compensation policy governing the terms of office and employment of office holders, after considering the recommendations of the compensation committee. The final adoption of the compensation policy is subject to the approval of the shareholders of the company. Such shareholder approval is subject to certain special majority requirements, as set forth in the Companies Law, pursuant to which the shareholder majority approval must also either include at least a majority of the shares held by non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who actively participate in the voting process (without taking abstaining votes into account), or, alternatively, the total shareholdings of the non-controlling and disinterested shareholders who voted against the transaction must not represent more than two percent of the voting rights in the company.
Nonetheless, even if the shareholders of the company do not approve the proposed compensation policy, the board of directors of a company may approve the proposed compensation policy, provided that the compensation committee and, thereafter, the board of directors resolved, based on detailed, documented, reasons and after a second review of the compensation policy, that the approval of such compensation policy is for the benefit of the company.
Pursuant to the Companies Law, the terms of office and employment of an office holder in a public company should be in accordance with the company’s compensation policy. Nonetheless, provisions were established in the Companies Law that allow a company, under special circumstances, to approve terms of office and employment that are not in line with the approved compensation policy.
90

Terms of office and employment of office holders who are neither directors nor the general manager and which comply with the company’s compensation policy require approval by the (i) compensation committee; and (ii) the board of directors. Approval of terms of office and employment for such office holders which do not comply with the compensation policy may nonetheless be approved subject to two cumulative conditions: (i) the compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors, approved the terms after having taken into account the various policy considerations and mandatory requirements set forth in the Companies Law with respect to office holder compensation, and (ii) the shareholders of the company approved the terms of office and employment for such office holders by means of the special majority required for approving the compensation policy (as detailed above). Following the Amendment to the Affiliation Regulations, non-material changes to the terms of compensation of office holders who are subordinated to the company general manager will require only general manager approval, provided that the company's compensation policy includes a reasonable range for such non-material changes.
Terms of office and employment of the general manager which comply with the company’s compensation policy require approval by the (i) compensation committee; (ii) the board of directors and (iii) the shareholders of the company by means of the special majority required for approving the compensation policy (as detailed above). Approval of terms of office and employment for the general manager which do not comply with the compensation policy may nonetheless be approved subject to two cumulative conditions: (i) the compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors, approved the terms after having taken into account the various policy considerations and mandatory requirements set forth in the Companies Law with respect to office holder compensation, and (ii) the shareholders of the company approved the terms of office and employment for the general manager which deviate from the compensation policy by means of the special majority required for approving the compensation policy (as detailed above). Notwithstanding the foregoing, a company may be exempted from receiving shareholder approval with respect to the terms of office and employment of a proposed candidate for general manager if such candidate meets certain independence criteria, the terms of office and employment are in line with the compensation policy, and the compensation committee has determined for specified reasons that presenting the matter for shareholder approval would thwart the proposed engagement. In addition, following the Amendment to the Affiliation Regulations, the terms of compensation of the general manager will not require shareholders approval when extending or re-approving the company's engagement with its general manager, provided that such terms are not more beneficial compared to his previous compensation terms approved by the shareholders pursuant to the Companies Law and provided that such terms comply with the company's compensation policy.
Terms of office and employment of office holders (including the general manager) that are not directors may nonetheless be approved by the company despite shareholder rejection, provided that a company’s compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors have determined to approve such terms of office and employment based on detailed reasoning, after having re-examined the proposed terms of office and employment, and having taken the shareholder rejection into consideration.
91

Terms of office and employment of directors which comply with the company’s compensation policy require approval by the (i) compensation committee; (ii) the board of directors and (iii) the shareholders of the company. Approval of terms of office and employment for directors of a company which do not comply with the compensation policy may nonetheless be approved subject to two cumulative conditions: (i) the compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors, approved the terms after having taken into account the various policy considerations and mandatory requirements set forth in the Companies Law with respect to office holder compensation, and (ii) the shareholders of the company have approved the terms by means of the special majority required for approving the compensation policy (as detailed above).
Private placements in a public company require approval by a company’s board of directors and shareholders in the following cases:

1. | A private placement that meets all of the following conditions:

| · | The private placement will increase the relative holdings of a shareholder that holds five percent or more of the company’s outstanding share capital, assuming the exercise of all of the securities convertible into shares held by that person, or that will cause any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a holder of more than five percent of the company's outstanding share capital.

| · | 20 percent or more of the voting rights in the company prior to such issuance are being offered.

| · | All or part of the consideration for the offering is not cash or registered securities, or the private placement is not being offered at market terms.

2. | A private placement which results in anyone becoming a controlling shareholder of the public company.

In addition, under the Companies Law, certain transactions or a series of transactions are considered to be one private placement. A private placement that meets all of the above conditions, and which must be approved by the shareholders, must also be for the benefit of the company.
Any placement of securities that does not fit the above description may be issued at the discretion of the board of directors.
Under the Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to act in good faith towards the company and other shareholders when exercising his or her rights and refrain from abusing his power in the company, including, among other things, voting in the general meeting of shareholders on the following matters:

| · | any amendment to the articles of association;

| · | an increase of the company’s authorized share capital;

| · | a merger; or

| · | approval of interested party acts and transactions that require general meeting approval as provided in sections 255 and 268 to 275 of the Israeli Companies Law.

92

Furthermore, the Companies Law requires that a shareholder refrain from acting in a discriminatory manner towards other shareholders.
The Companies Law does not describe the substance of the aforementioned duties of shareholders, but provides that laws applicable to a breach of contract, adjusted according to the circumstances shall apply to a breach of such duties. With respect to the obligation to refrain from acting discriminatorily, a shareholder that is discriminated against can petition the court to instruct the company to remove or prevent the discrimination, as well as provide instructions with respect to future actions.
In addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who knows that it possesses power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any shareholder who, pursuant to the provisions of a company's articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder in the company is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company. The breach of such duty is governed by Israeli contract laws. The Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty to act with fairness, but provides that laws applicable to a breach of contract, adjusted according to the circumstances, and taking into account the status within the company of such shareholder, shall apply to a breach of such duty.
The Companies Law requires that specified types of transactions, actions and arrangements be approved as provided for in a company’s articles of association and in some circumstances by the audit committee or compensation committee, by the board of directors and by the general meeting of the shareholders.
As stated above, the Israeli legislature, the Knesset, approved Amendment 16 to the Companies Law which came into effect during 2011, Amendment 20 which came into effect at the end of 2012, and Amendment 22 which came into effect at the beginning of 2014 and Amendment 26 which came into effect at the end of 2014. The purposes of these amendments to the Companies Law were to revise and enhance existing provisions governing corporate governance practices of Israeli companies, to regulate executive pay in Israeli publicly traded companies and to revise and enhance existing provisions governing approval of executive compensation. The principal provisions set forth in these amendments to the Companies Law are incorporated into the above discussions of the Company. Additional changes to the Companies Law pursuant to these recently passed amendments include:

| · | Code of Corporate Governance. Under the Sixteenth Amendment, a code of recommended corporate governance practices has been attached as an annex to the Companies Law. In the explanatory notes to the legislation, the Knesset noted that an "adopt or disclose non-adoption" regulation would be issued by the Israeli Securities Authority with respect to such code. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Israeli Securities Authority has issued reporting instructions with respect to this code which are applicable only to publicly traded companies whose securities are traded solely on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and which report solely to the Israeli Securities Authority.

| · | Fines. The Israeli Securities Authority shall be authorized to impose fines on any person or company performing a violation, in connection with a publicly traded company which reports to the Israeli Securities Authority, and specifically designated as a violation under the Sixteenth Amendment.

93

Although we expect to be in compliance with the Companies Law, there is no assurance that we will not be required to adjust our current corporate governance practices, as discussed in this annual report, pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Law, and recently passed amendments to the Companies Law.
The Israeli Securities Law and the Securities Law Amendment
On February 27, 2011, an amendment to the Israeli Securities Law came into effect (the “Securities Law Amendment”), which applies to Israeli public companies, including companies the securities of which are also listed on NASDAQ Global Market. The main purpose of the Securities Law Amendment is creating an administrative enforcement procedure to be used by the Israeli Securities Authority ("ISA") to enhance the efficacy of enforcement in the securities market in Israel. The new administrative enforcement procedure may be applied to any company or person (including director, officer or shareholder of a company) performing any of the actions specifically designated as breaches of law under the Securities Law Amendment.
Furthermore, the Securities Law Amendment requires that the chief executive officer of a company supervise and take all reasonable measures to prevent the company or any of its employees from breaching the Israeli Securities Law.
Under the Securities Law Amendment, a company cannot obtain insurance against or indemnify a third party (including its officers and/or employees) for any administrative procedure and/or monetary fine (other than for certain legal expenses and payments of damages to an injured party). The Securities Law Amendment permits insurance and/or indemnification for expenses related to an administrative procedure, such as reasonable legal fees, provided that it is permitted under the company's articles of association. In January 2012 each of our Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved a new form of Indemnification Agreement with our directors and officers serving in such positions from time to time so as to reflect this amendment, subject to approval of our shareholders to the relevant changes required to our Articles of Association. Our shareholders approved these amendments to the Articles of Association and a revised form of Indemnification Agreement for directors serving in such capacity from time to time, at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders held on April 11, 2012. As per Amendment 20, it was decided on July 31, 2013, at the Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders to adopt the Executive Compensation Policy of the Company, which had been recommended by our Compensation Committee and approved by or Board of Directors. Our approved Executive Compensation Policy includes the above referenced form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into by the Company with our directors and officers serving in such capacities from time to time.
We continue to examine the implications of the Securities Law Amendment and to review all of our internal policies and procedures in order to ensure compliance with all the securities laws to which we are subject; however, its effect and consequences, as well as our scope of exposure, are yet to be entirely determined in practice. There is no assurance that we will not be required to take certain actions in order to enhance our compliance with the provisions of the Securities Law Amendment, such as adopting and implementing an internal enforcement plan as well as additional internal policies and procedures in order to reduce our exposure to potential breaches of the Israeli Securities Law.
94

NASDAQ Listing Rules and Home Country Practices
Below is a concise summary of the significant ways in which our corporate practices, which are in accordance with Israeli law and practice, including the provisions of the Companies Law, differ from the requirements which may be applicable to domestic U.S. listed companies:

| · | Distribution of annual and quarterly reports to shareholders – Under Israeli law we are not required to distribute annual and quarterly reports directly to shareholders and the generally accepted business practice in Israel is not to distribute such reports to shareholders. We do however make our audited financial statements available to our shareholders prior to our annual general meeting and furnish our quarterly and annual financial results with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 6-K.

| · | Independence, Nomination and Compensation of Directors – A majority of our board of directors may not necessarily be comprised of independent directors as defined in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). Our board of directors contains two external directors in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law. Israeli law does not require, nor do our external directors conduct, regularly scheduled meetings at which only they are present. In addition, with the exception of our external directors, our directors are elected for terms of one year or until the following annual meeting, by a general meeting of our shareholders. The nominations for director which are presented to our shareholders are generally made by our board of directors. One or more shareholders of a company holding at least one percent of the voting power of the company may nominate a currently serving external director for an additional three year term. Israeli law does not require the adoption of and our board has not adopted a formal written charter or board resolution addressing the nomination process and related matters. Compensation of our directors and other officers of the Company is determined in accordance with Israeli law.

| · | Audit Committee – Our audit committee does not meet with all the requirements of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605. We are of the opinion that the members of our audit committee comply with the requirements of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(3) and Rule 10A-3(b) of the general rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and all requirements under Israeli law. Our audit committee has not adopted a formal written audit committee charter specifying the items enumerated in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(1).

95

| · | Compensation Committee - We follow the provisions of the Companies Law with respect to matters in connection with the composition and responsibilities of our compensation committee, office holder compensation, and any required approval by the shareholders of such compensation. Israeli law, and our amended and restated articles of association, do not require that a compensation committee composed solely of independent members of our board of directors determine (or recommend to the board of directors for determination) an executive officer’s compensation, as required under NASDAQ’s listing standards related to compensation committee independence and responsibilities; nor do they require that the Company adopt and file a compensation committee charter. Instead, our compensation committee has been established and conducts itself in accordance with provisions governing the composition of and the responsibilities of a compensation committee as set forth in the Companies Law. Furthermore, the compensation of office holders is determined and approved by our compensation committee and our board of directors, and in certain circumstances by our shareholders, either in consistency with our previously approved Executive Compensation Policy or, in special circumstances in deviation therefrom, taking into account certain considerations set forth in the Companies Law. The requirements for shareholder approval of any office holder compensation, and the relevant majority or special majority for such approval, are all as set forth in the Companies Law. Thus, we will seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions with respect to office holder compensation requiring such approval under the requirements of the Companies Law, including seeking prior approval of the shareholders for the Executive Compensation Policy and for certain office holder compensation, rather than seeking approval for such corporate actions in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules.

| · | Quorum – Under Israeli law a company is entitled to determine in its articles of association the number of shareholders and percentage of holdings required for a quorum at a shareholders meeting. Our Articles of Association provide that a quorum of two or more shareholders, present in person or by proxy, holding shares conferring in the aggregate more than thirty three and a third (33 1/3 %) percent of the voting power of the Company is required for commencement of business at a general meeting.

| · | Approval of Related Party Transactions – All related party transactions are approved in accordance with the requirements and procedures for approval of interested party acts and transactions, set forth in sections 268 to 275 of the Companies Law.

| · | Shareholder Approval – We seek shareholder approval for all corporate action requiring such approval, in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law.

| · | Equity Compensation Plans - We do not necessarily seek shareholder approval for the establishment of, and amendments to, stock option or equity compensation plans (as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)), as such matters are not subject to shareholder approval under Israeli law. We will attempt to seek shareholder approval for our stock option or equity compensation plans (and the relevant annexes thereto) to the extent required in order to ensure they are tax qualified for our employees in the United States. However, even if such approval is not received, then the stock option or equity compensation plans will continue to be in effect, but the Company will be unable to grant options to its U.S. employees that qualify as Incentive Stock Options for U.S. federal tax purpose. Our stock option or other equity compensation plans are also available to our non-U.S. employees, and provide features necessary to comply with applicable non-U.S. tax laws.

96

C. Material Contracts
All of our contracts over the past two years have been entered into in the ordinary course of business, except for some of our real property leases, the Fiberblaze SPA and the ADI APA.
Fiberblaze Share Purchase Agreement
On December 10, 2014, we entered into the Fiberblaze SPA with Fiberblaze, Fiberblaze Holding APS, a Danish company ("Fiberblaze Holding"), Hilmer APS, a Danish company ("Hilmer"), Jakob Hilmer and Nikolaj Herman (Fiberblaze Holding and Hilmer together, the "Selling Shareholders"). Under the Fiberblaze SPA, we purchased all of the share capital of Fiberblaze and Fiberblaze US LLC, a New York company and wholly owned subsidiary of Fiberblaze, for consideration of approximately $10,000,000 in cash (of which $3,000,000 was deposited in an escrow account to be distributed in accordance with specific terms or to be released to the Selling Shareholders upon the lapse of 18 months from the date of the Fiberblaze SPA), subject to certain adjustments, as well as additional consideration to be paid upon the attainment of future performance milestones relating to Fiberblaze revenues and achievement of design wins until August 31, 2015 (the "Additional Consideration"). Ninety percent of the Additional Consideration shall be paid, if applicable, in cash (the "Cash Additional Consideration"), and the remaining ten percent shall be paid by way of a grant of stock options of the Company with an exercise price equal to the closing trading price of the Company's ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the date of grant (the "Option-based Additional Consideration"). In April 2016, we have fully paid such Additional Consideration in the total amount of approximately $1,460,000 as set forth above, whereby we have paid approximately $1,300,000 as the Cash Additional Consideration and have granted 6,704 stock options as the Option-based Additional Consideration.
ADI Engineering Asset Purchase Agreement
On September 30, 2015, we, together with one of our wholly owned subsidiaries Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc., entered into the ADI APA with ADI, Steve Yates and Patricia Yates. Under the ADI APA, we purchased ADI's assets in consideration for an amount equal to $10,000,000 in cash at closing, as well as additional consideration to be paid upon the attainment of future performance milestones relating to ADI revenues for each of the years 2015, 2016 and 2017, which shall be determined as a percentage of the revenues which are in excess with respect to each relevant milestone (the "Excess Consideration"). In April 2016 we have paid the Excess Consideration for 2015 in the total amount of $3,000,000. For additional information see Note 3A to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Information regarding our real property leases is provided in “Item 4. Information on the Company – Property, Plant and Equipment” and "Item 19. Exhibits".
D. Exchange Controls
Under current Israeli laws and regulations, any dividends or other distributions paid in respect of our ordinary shares purchased by nonresidents of Israel with certain non-Israeli currencies (including U.S. dollars) and any amounts payable upon the dissolution, liquidation or winding up of our affairs, as well as the proceeds of any sale in Israel of our securities to an Israeli resident, will be freely repatriable in such non-Israeli currencies, provided that Israeli income tax has been paid on (or withheld from) such payments. Because exchange rates between the NIS and the U.S. dollar fluctuate continuously, U.S. shareholders will be subject to any such currency fluctuation during the period from when such dividend is declared through the date payment is made in U.S. dollars.
97

There are currently no Israeli currency control restrictions on remittances of dividends on our ordinary shares, proceeds from the sale of the shares or interest or other payments to non-residents of Israel, except under certain circumstances, for shareholders who are subjects of countries that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.
E. Taxation
The following is a summary of some of the current tax law applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us. The following also contains a discussion of specified Israeli tax consequences to our shareholders and government programs from which we benefit. To the extent that the discussion is based on tax legislation (including the legislation passed as part of the recent tax reform in Israel) that has not been subject to judicial or administrative interpretation, there can be no assurance that the views expressed in the discussion will be accepted by the tax authorities in question.
The discussion is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations.
Holders of our ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States, Israeli or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, or receipt of any dividend distributions made to our shareholders, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local taxes, and of any taxes withheld at source by the Company.
General Corporate Tax
As of 2016, Israeli companies are subject to corporate tax at the rate of 25%. However, the effective tax rate payable by a company which derives income from a Benefited Enterprise (as further discussed below) may be considerably less.
In 2006, transfer pricing regulations came into force, following the introduction of Section 85A of the Israeli Tax Ordinance (New Version), 5721- 1961, referred to herein as the Israeli Tax Ordinance, under Amendment 132. The transfer pricing rules require that cross-border transactions between related parties be carried out implementing an arms’ length principle and reported and taxed accordingly.
In 2008, the Knesset passed an amendment to the Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments), 1985, which limits the scope of the law starting in 2008 and thereafter. Starting in 2008, the revenues for tax purposes are measured in nominal values, excluding certain adjustments for changes in the consumer price index carried out in the period up to December 31, 2007. The amended law includes, among other provisions, the elimination of the inflationary additions and deductions and the additional deduction for depreciation for the period starting in 2008.
98

Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959
Certain of our facilities have been granted “Benefited Enterprise” status under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959, as amended (the “Investment Law”). The Investment Law provides that a capital investment in eligible facilities may, upon application to the Israel Investment Center of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the State of Israel (referred to as the Investment Center), be designated as a Benefited Enterprise. Each certificate of approval for a Benefited Enterprise relates to a specific investment program delineated both by its financial scope, including its capital sources and its physical characteristics, for example, the equipment to be purchased and utilized pursuant to the program. The tax benefits derived from any such certificate of approval relate only to taxable income attributable to the specific Benefited Enterprise.
An amendment to the Investment Law which came into effect as of April 1, 2005 (the "First Amendment”) has significantly changed the provisions of the Investment Law. The First Amendment determined criteria for the approval of a facility as a Benefited Enterprise, such as provisions generally requiring that at least 25% of the income of a Benefited Enterprise will be derived from exports. Additionally, as explained below, the First Amendment sets forth major changes in the manner in which tax benefits were awarded under the Investment Law whereby companies would no longer require Investment Center approval (and Benefited Enterprise status) in order to qualify for tax benefits. However, the Investment Law provides that terms and benefits included in any certificate of approval already granted will remain subject to the provisions of the Investment Law as in effect on the date of such approval. Therefore the tax benefits granted to our Benefited Enterprises under the Investment Law will generally not be subject to the provisions of the First Amendment. Many of the requirements under the Investment Law following the First Amendment were amended again in a second amendment to the Investment Law (the “Second Amendment”), as will be described below.
Tax Benefits Prior to the First Amendment
In general, taxable income of a company derived from a Benefited Enterprise was subject to tax exemption and/or reduced corporate tax (this will also apply to Benefited Enterprises approved after the First Amendment, as explained below). The reduced corporate tax rate applies for a period of time termed the “benefit period”. The benefit period was a period of seven years commencing with the year in which the Benefited Enterprise first generates taxable income. In any event, the benefit period was limited to 12 years from the commencement of production or operation, or 14 years from the year in which the approval was received, whichever is earlier. Under certain circumstances (as further detailed below), the benefit period may have been extended to a maximum of ten years from the commencement of the benefit period. In the event that a company was operating under more than one approval or that only part of its capital investments were approved (a “Mixed Enterprise”), its effective corporate tax rate was the result of a weighted combination of the various applicable rates.
99

Prior to the First Amendment, a company owning a Benefited Enterprise approved after April 1, 1986 (or prior thereto provided no government grants or loans had previously been granted regarding such enterprise) was entitled to elect (as we have) to forego certain Government grants extended to Benefited Enterprises in return for an “alternative route” of tax benefits (the “Alternative Route”). Under the Alternative Route, a company’s undistributed income derived from a Benefited Enterprise was exempt from corporate tax for a period of between two and ten years from the first year of taxable income, depending on the geographic location of the Benefited Enterprise within Israel, and such company was eligible for the reduced tax rates under the Investment Law for the remainder of the benefit period as mentioned above.
Our production facilities have been granted “Benefited Enterprise” status under the Alternative Route according to the Investment Law. The initial Benefited Enterprise status was granted in 1988 (“Initial Benefited Enterprise”). An extension program was granted Benefited Enterprise status in 1995 (the “Extended Benefited Enterprise”). Income derived from our Benefited Enterprises is tax exempt during six years of the seven year tax benefit period and is subject to a reduced tax rate of 25% in the seventh year. The seven year period of benefits commences in the year the Benefited Enterprise first earns taxable income but is limited to twelve years from commencement of production or fourteen years from date of approval, whichever is earlier. The period of tax benefits, relating to our Initial Benefited Enterprise, commenced in 1991 and expired in 1997. The period of tax benefits relating to our Extended Benefited Enterprise commenced in 1997 and expired in 2006, as explained below.
In June 1995, we reached an agreement with the tax authorities regarding our entitlement to benefits under the Investment Law. The agreement, effective from tax year 1994 and thereafter, relates to the method of determination of taxable income from our research and development activities. Pursuant to the agreement, for the purpose of determining our tax liability, our income will be allocated to our manufacturing plant and to our research and development center, according to a formula based on the net costs plus royalties of the research and development center and our profitability. Income allocated to the expansion of the manufacturing plant will benefit from a ten-year tax exemption, while income allocated to the research and development center will benefit from a two-year exemption, and for a five-year period immediately following will be taxed at a 25% rate.
Our income to be attributed to our Extended Benefited Enterprise in any year will be computed as a ratio of the increase in our sales turnover, if any, in that year to our turnover in the year before the Extended Benefited Enterprise commenced its tax benefits entitlement. The tax authorities have reserved their right to reconsider our claim to such tax benefits in future years.
100

The entitlement to the above benefits is conditional upon our fulfillment of the conditions stipulated by the law, regulations published thereunder and the instruments of approval for the specific investments in the Benefited Enterprise. In the event of failure to comply with these conditions, the benefits may be canceled and we may be required to refund the amount of the benefits, in whole or in part, with the addition of linkage differences, interest and penalties. Should we derive income from sources other than the Benefited Enterprise during the relevant periods of benefits, such income will be taxable at regular corporate tax rates stated above.
A company that elected the Alternative Route prior to the First Amendment and that subsequently paid a dividend out of tax exempted income derived from the Benefited Enterprise(s) will be subject to Company Tax in the year the dividend is distributed in respect of the amount distributed (including the corporate tax thereon), at the rate that would have been applicable had the company not elected the Alternative Route (25%). In addition, the dividend recipient is taxed at the rate applicable to dividends from Benefited Enterprises (20%), if the dividend is distributed during the tax exemption period or within a specified period thereafter (in the event, however, that the company qualified as a Foreign Investors' Company, there was no such time limitation).
Subject to certain provisions concerning income subject to the Alternative Route, all dividends are considered to be attributable to the entire enterprise and the effective tax rate is the result of a weighted combination of the various applicable tax rates. Under the Investment Law, a company that has elected the alternative package of benefits was not required to distribute exempt retained profits, and may generally decide from which year’s profits to declare dividends.
The Investment Law also provided that a Benefited Enterprise was entitled to accelerated depreciation on its property and equipment that were included in an approved investment program. We have not utilized this benefit.
Grants and certain other incentives received by a company in accordance with the Investment Law remained subject to final ratification by the Israel Investment Center and final determination by the Israel Tax Authority. Such ratification and determination were conditional upon fulfillment of all of the terms of the approved program.
Tax Benefits under the First Amendment
As a result of the First Amendment, a company was no longer required to acquire Benefited Enterprise status in order to receive the tax benefits previously available under the Alternative Route and therefore such companies did not need to apply to the Investment Center for this purpose. However, the Investment Center continued granting Benefited Enterprise status to companies seeking Governmental grants. A company could have claimed the tax benefits offered by the Investment Law directly in its tax returns, provided that its facilities meet the criteria for tax benefits set forth in the First Amendment (a “Benefited Enterprise”). Companies were also entitled to approach the Israeli Tax Authority for a pre-ruling regarding their eligibility for benefits under the First Amendment. The First Amendment included provisions intended to ensure that a company will not enjoy both government grants and tax benefits for the same investment program.
101

Tax benefits were available under the First Amendment to production facilities and other eligible facilities, which were generally required to derive more than 25% of their business income from exports. In order to receive the tax benefits, the First Amendment stated that the company must make an investment in the Benefited Enterprise exceeding a minimum amount specified in the Investment Law. Such investment could have been made over a period of no more than three years, such period concluding at the end of the year in which the company requested to have the tax benefits apply to its Benefited Enterprise (the “Year of Election”). Where the company requested to have the tax benefits apply to an expansion of existing facilities, only the expansion was considered a Benefited Enterprise and the company’s effective tax rate was the result of a weighted combination of the applicable rates. In the case of an expansion of existing facilities, the minimum investment required in order to qualify as a Benefited Enterprise was determined as a certain percentage of the company’s production assets before the expansion and in any case was not less than NIS 300,000.
The tax benefits which were available under the First Amendment to qualifying income of a Benefited Enterprise were determined by the geographic location of the Benefited Enterprise in Israel. The Investment Law divides the country into three zones – A, B and C, so that a Benefited Enterprise operating in Zone A (which generally includes areas remote from the center of Israel) received the greatest benefits and Benefited Enterprises in Zone C received the least benefits.
The First Amendment provided that a company producing income from a Benefited Enterprise in Zone A could have elected either that (i) the undistributed income derived from the Benefited Enterprise will be fully tax exempt for the entire benefit period described below (“tax exemption”), in which case the ordinary provisions described below concerning the taxation of the company and shareholder for distribution of dividends will apply; or (ii) that the income from its Benefited Enterprise will be subject to corporate tax at a rate of a 11.5%, in which case dividends paid out of such income to a foreign resident will be taxed at a rate of 4% and to an Israeli resident will be taxed at a rate of 20%, and the company will not be subject to additional tax upon dividend distribution. Further benefits were available in the event of certain large investments by multinational companies. Benefited Enterprises located in Zones B and C was exempt from tax for six and two years, respectively, and subject to tax at a rate of 10%-25% for the remainder of the benefit period, depending on the extent of foreign investment in the Company, as described above.
Dividends paid out of income derived by a Benefited Enterprise, or out of dividends received from a company whose income was derived from a Benefited Enterprise, were generally subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% (or 20% if the Year of Election is 2014 onwards) or less under certain anti double-taxation treaties, such tax being deductible at source. The reduced withholding tax rate of 20% was limited to dividends and distributions out of income derived during the benefit period and actually paid at any time up to 12 years thereafter. A company qualified for tax benefits under the First Amendment which paid a dividend out of income derived by its Benefited Enterprise during the tax exemption period will be subject to corporate tax in respect of the gross amount of the dividend. The rate of the tax was the rate which would have been applicable had the company not been tax exempt. Such tax rate was lower in the case of a qualified “Foreign Investors’ Company”.
102

The period for which tax benefits were available under the First Amendment was also determined by the geographical location of the Benefited Enterprise in Israel. The benefit period for Benefited Enterprises in Zone A ended on the earlier of (i) a period of ten years from the tax year in which the company first derived taxable income from the Benefited Enterprise (the “Commencement Year”); or (ii) twelve years (or in certain cases fourteen years) from the first day of the Year of Election. The benefit period for Benefited Enterprises in Zones B and C was extended until the earlier of (i) seven years from the Commencement Year or (ii) 12 years from the first day of the Year of Election. This period could have been extended for Benefited Enterprises owned by a “Foreign Investors’ Company” during all or part of the benefit period.
Additionally, the First Amendment sets forth a minimal amount of foreign investment required for a company to be regarded a Foreign Investors’ Company.
We have selected the 2004 tax year, the 2006 tax year, the 2009 tax year and the 2012 tax year to be our Year of Election, from which the period of benefits under the Investment Law commenced.
There can be no assurance that we will attain approval for additional tax benefits under the Amendment, or receive approval for Benefited Enterprises in the future.
The Second Amendment to the Investment Law
The Israeli legislature, the Knesset, approved significant changes to the Investment Law, which revamped the tax incentive regime in Israel and which became effective as of January 6, 2011. The main changes enacted under the Second Amendment are, inter alia, as follows:

| · | Replacement of all future tax incentives under the existing law as amended by the First Amendment; as a result, commencing 2011, industrial companies that meet the conditions set out by the Second Amendment will no longer be entitled to the existing tax incentives provided under the First Amendment, such as the exemption from tax on undistributed profits and a reduced tax rate thereafter, but rather to the tax incentives under the Second Amendment.

| · | Under the transition provisions, any tax benefits obtained prior to 2011 shall continue to apply until expired, unless the company elects to apply the provisions of the Second Amendment to its income.

| · | Pursuant to the second Amendment, a Preferred Enterprise is entitled to a reduced corporate flat tax rate of 15% with respect to its preferred income derived by its Preferred Enterprise in 2011-2012, unless the Preferred Enterprise is located in a certain development zone, in which case the rate will be 10%. Such corporate tax rates are 12.5% and 7% with respect to 2013 and 16% and 9% with respect to 2014 and thereafter. Income derived by a Preferred Company from a ‘Special Preferred Enterprise’ (as such term is defined in the Investment Law) would be entitled, during a benefits period of 10 years, to further reduced tax rates of 8%, or to 5% if the Special Preferred Enterprise is located in a certain development zone. Under the Second Amendment, the tax incentives offered by the Investment Law are no longer dependant neither on minimum qualified investments nor on foreign ownership.

| · | Companies will be able to enjoy both government grants and tax benefits concurrently. Governmental grants will not necessarily be dependent on the extent of enterprise’s investment in assets and/or equipment. Commencing 2011, the approval of “Preferred Enterprise” status by either the Israeli Tax Authorities or the Investment Center will be accepted by the other. Therefore a Preferred Enterprise will be eligible to receive both tax incentives and government grants, under certain conditions.

103

“Preferred Income” is defined as income from the sale of products of the Preferred Enterprise (including components that were produced by other enterprises); income from the sale of semiconductors by other non related enterprises which use the Preferred Enterprise’s self-developed know-how; income for providing a right to use the Preferred Enterprise’s know-how or software; royalties from the use of the know-how or software which was confirmed by the Head of The Investment Center to be related to the production activity of the Preferred Enterprise and services with respect to the aforementioned sales. In addition, the definition of “Preferred Income” also includes income from the provision of industrial R&D services to foreign residents to the extent that the services were approved by the Head of Research for the Industrial Development and Administration.
A “Preferred Enterprise” is defined as an Industrial Enterprise (including, inter alia, an enterprise which develops software, an enterprise which provides approved R&D services to foreign residents and an enterprise which the Chief Scientist confirmed is carrying out R&D in the field of alternative energy), which generally more than 25% of its business income is from export to market consisting more than 14 million residents. As mentioned above, the new tax incentives no longer depend on minimum qualified investments nor on foreign ownership.
Chapter B2 of the Investment Law determines the conditions and limitations applying to the tax benefits offered to a “Special Preferred Enterprise”. Chapter B2 determines that a “Special Preferred Enterprise” will be able to enjoy corporate income tax rate in a rate of 5% if located in a preferred zone and 8% if not located in a preferred zone.
A “Special Preferred Enterprise” is defined following the Second Amendment as a Preferred Enterprise which meets one of the following conditions: (a) its Preferred Income is equal to or exceeds NIS 1.5 billion; (b) the total income of the company which owns the Preferred Enterprise or which operates in the same field of the Preferred Enterprise and which consolidates in its financial reports the company that owns the Preferred Enterprise equals or exceeds NIS 20 billion; and (c) its business plan was approved by the authorities as significantly benefitting the Israeli economy, either by an investment of at least NIS 400 - 800 million in assets; 100 - 150 million NIS in R&D or the employment of at least 250 to 500 new employees, for preferred zones and regular zones, respectively.
104

Dividends paid out of income attributed to a Preferred Enterprise are generally subject to withholding tax at source at a rate of 15% (20% as of 2014) or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable tax treaty, subject to the submission and approval of a request submitted on behalf of the recipient of such dividends to the Israel Tax Authority. However, if such dividends are paid to an Israeli company no tax will be withheld. Such an exemption may apply under the transition rules also to dividends distributed to an Israeli company by an Israeli company which owns a Benefited Enterprise or a Benefited Enterprise and which elected to convert to the new law until June 30, 2015 (in respect to their existing programs).
The Company elected in 2014 to apply the provisions of the Second Amendment to the Investment Law to its income commencing with the 2014 fiscal year. Thus, as of the 2014 fiscal year, we will no longer be entitled to the existing tax incentives provided under the First Amendment, such as the exemption from tax on undistributed profits and a reduced tax rate thereafter, but rather to the tax incentives under the Second Amendment.
There can be no assurance that we will comply with the conditions of the Investment Law in the future or that we will be entitled to any additional benefits under the amended Investment Law under the First Amendment and/or the Second Amendment and whether the influence of the changes to the Investment Law will be beneficial to the Company or not.
Law for the Encouragement of Industrial Research and Development, 1984
Under the terms of the pre-R&D Amendment regime, research and development programs approved by the Research Committee (the “Research Committee”) of the OCS were eligible for grants or loans if they met certain criteria, in return for the payment of royalties from the sale of the product developed in accordance with the program and subject to other restrictions. Once a project was approved, the OCS would award grants of up to 50% of the project’s expenditures in return for royalties, usually at the rate of 3% to 5% of sales of products developed with such grants. For projects approved after January 1, 1999, the amount of royalties payable is up to a dollar-linked amount equal to 100% of such grants plus interest at LIBOR.
The terms of these grants prohibited the manufacture outside of Israel of the product developed in accordance with the program without the prior consent of the Research Committee of the OCS. Such approval, if granted, was generally subject to an increase in the total amount to be repaid to the OCS to between 120% and 300% of the amount granted, depending on the extent of the manufacturing to be conducted outside of Israel.
105

The R&D Law, as in effect prior to the R&D Amendment, also provided that know-how from the research and development, which is used to produce the product, may not be transferred to Israeli third parties without the approval of the Research Committee. Until 2005, the Research Law stated that such know-how may not be transferred to non-Israeli third parties at all. An amendment to the Research Law set forth certain exceptions to this rule; however, the practical implications of such exceptions were quite limited. The R&D Law, as in effect prior to the R&D Amendment, stressed that it is not just transfer of know-how that is prohibited, but also transfer of any rights in such know-how. Such restriction did not apply to exports from Israel of final products developed with such technologies. It was possible to receive approval of the transfer only if the transferee undertook to abide by all of the provisions of the R&D Law and regulations promulgated thereunder, including the restrictions on the transfer of know-how and the obligation to pay royalties. There could be no assurance that such consent, if requested, would be granted or, if granted, that such consent would be on reasonable commercial terms.
On July 29, 2015, the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, enacted the R&D Amendment, designated to provide the ability to respond quickly to the challenges of a changing world, after reaching the conclusion that the pre-R&D Amendment regime was found to not to have the required flexibility in today's rapidly changing world. Pursuant to the R&D Amendment, the OCS shall be replaced with the newly established National Authority for Technological Innovation (the "Authority"), which will be comprised of a Council body, the Chief Scientist, the Director General and a member of the Research Committee. According to the R&D Amendment, the Council will have broad discretion regarding material matters, including with respect to the new funding programs ("Tracks"), will be required to determine certain characteristics (which are mainly technical but also include the type of Benefit ("Benefit", as defined under the R&D Amendment, includes grants, loans, exemptions, discounts, guarantees and additional means of assistance, but with the exclusion of purchase of shares), to be granted as well as its scope, conditions for receipt of approval for the Benefit and the identity of the party which is permitted to perform the approved activities, and may determine additional matters, including delay in payment of the Benefit and requests for provision of guarantees for its receipt, payment of an advance by the Authority, what know-how will be developed and requirements regarding its full or partial ownership, provisions regarding transfer, disclosure or exposure of know-how to third parties in Israel and abroad (including payment or non-payment for the same, as well as ceilings for such payments), requirements with respect to manufacture in Israel and transfer of manufacture abroad (including payment for such transfer), performance of innovative activities for the benefit of third parties, etc. In addition, while the pre-R&D Amendment regime provided base-line default terms and conditions with respect to the core issues relevant for OCS grant recipients, as provided above, these default provisions have been largely rescinded by the R&D Amendment. Many of these matters will now be decided separately for each Track by the Council, based on certain guidelines stipulated in the R&D Amendment. Such guidelines provide, for example, that considerable preference should be given to having ownership of OCS-funded know-how and rights vest with the Benefit recipient and/or with an Israeli company, with transfer of know-how and related rights abroad to be permitted only in exceptional circumstances. In addition, the R&D Amendment determines that the transfer of manufacturing rights abroad, whether under a license or otherwise, shall only be allowed in special circumstances. Nonetheless, these matters are merely guidelines, and the essential matters will be determined by the Council in its discretion. While the R&D Amendment is designated to provide flexibility in the rapidly changing business environment, leaving the above essential matters to the Council's discretion currently causes much ambiguity as to the implementation of the R&D Amendment. In addition, it should be noted that the R&D Amendment will come into force on January 1, 2016, after which it seems that the p pre-R&D Amendment regulations which determined material matters such as royalty rates, changes to royalty rates upon transfer of manufacturing rights abroad etc. will be rescinded, thus adding to the current uncertainty created by the R&D Amendment.
106

Tax Benefits for Research and Development
Israeli tax law allows, under certain conditions, a tax deduction in the year incurred for expenditures (including capital expenditures) in scientific research and development projects, if the expenditures are approved by the relevant Israeli Government Ministry (determined by the field of research) and the research and development is for the promotion of the enterprise and is carried out by or on behalf of the company seeking such deduction. Such expenditures not so approved are required to be deducted over a three-year period. Though we received such approvals for the years 2006, 2007 and 2008 and could deduct the expenditures in the year the expenditures were incurred, we chose to deduct the expenditures over a three-year period. We also received such approvals for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and deducted such expenditures in the year the expenditures were incurred.
Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969
Under the Law for the Encouragement of Industry (Taxes), 1969 (the “Industry Encouragement Law”), Industrial Companies (as defined below) are entitled to the following tax benefits:
(a) Amortization of purchases of know-how and patents over eight years for tax purposes.
(b) Amortization of expenses incurred in connection with certain public securities issuances over a three-year period.
(c) Accelerated depreciation rates on equipment and buildings.
Eligibility for benefits under the Industry Encouragement Law is not subject to receipt of prior approval from any governmental authority. Under the Industry Encouragement Law, an “Industrial Company” is defined as a company resident in Israel, at least 90% of the income of which, in any tax year, determined in Israeli currency, exclusive of income from government loans, capital gains, dividends, interest and linkage differences, is derived from an “Industrial Enterprise” owned by it. An “Industrial Enterprise” is defined as an enterprise whose major activity in a given tax year is industrial production activity.
107

We believe that we currently qualify as an Industrial Company within the definition of the Industry Encouragement Law. No assurance can be given that we will continue to qualify as an Industrial Company or that the benefits described above will be available in the future.
Calculation of Results for Tax Purposes
The Israeli Income Tax Regulations (Rules for Maintaining Accounting Records of Foreign Investors’ Companies and Certain Partnerships and Determining Their Taxable Income) - 1986 provide that as a Foreign Investors’ Company (as defined in the Investment Law described above) is eligible to calculate its taxable income in accordance with these regulations, and therefore, if we elect to follow such regulations, our taxable income or loss is to be calculated in dollars. We have elected to apply these regulations and accordingly our taxable income or loss is calculated in dollars in the manner set forth in such regulations.
Taxation of our Shareholders
Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Israeli Resident Shareholders. Until the end of the year 2002 and provided we maintained our status as an industrial corporation, capital gains from the sale of our securities were generally exempt from Israeli Capital Gains Tax. This exemption did not apply to a shareholder whose taxable income is determined pursuant to the Israeli Income Tax Law (Inflationary Adjustments) 1985, or to a person whose gains from selling or otherwise disposing of our securities were deemed to be business income.
On January 1, 2003 an amendment to the Israeli tax regime became effective. This was followed by new amendments made to the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance which were enacted in 2011 which have an effect for income derived as of 2012.
An individual is subject to a 25% tax rate on real capital gains derived from the sale of shares, as long as the individual is not a "substantial shareholder" in the company issuing the shares. A “substantial shareholder” is generally a person who alone, or together with his relative or another person who collaborates with him on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the “Means of control” of the corporation. “Means of control” generally include the right to vote, receive profits, nominate a director or an officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act, and all regardless of the source of such right.
A substantial shareholder will be subject to tax at a rate of 30% in respect of real capital gains derived from the sale of shares issued by a company in which he or she is a substantial shareholder. The determination of whether the individual is a substantial shareholder will be made on the date on which the securities are sold. In addition, the individual will be deemed to be a substantial shareholder if at any time during the 12 months preceding the date of sale, he or she was a substantial shareholder.
108

Capital Gains Taxes Applicable to Non-Israeli Resident Shareholders. Shareholders that are not Israeli residents are generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax on any gains derived from the sale, exchange or disposition of our shares, provided that such shareholders did not acquire their shares prior to our initial public offering on the TASE and such gains were not derived from a permanent establishment or business activity of such shareholders in Israel. However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemptions if an Israeli resident(s) (i) have a controlling interest of 25% or more in such non-Israeli corporation or (ii) are the beneficiaries of or are entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
In addition, under the U.S.-Israel Income Tax Treaty, 1995, or the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the sale, exchange or disposition of our shares by a shareholder who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty) holding the shares as a capital asset is exempt from Israeli capital gains tax unless either (i) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of our voting capital during any part of the 12-month period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition or (ii) the capital gains arising from such sale are attributable to a permanent establishment of the shareholder located in Israel; or (iii) the shareholder, being an individual, was present in Israel for a period of time or several periods of time, which aggregate to a total of 183 days or more, during a single taxable year. In either case, the sale, exchange or disposition of the shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the U.S. resident would be permitted to claim a credit for the tax against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to the sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits. The U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.
Shareholders may be required to demonstrate that they are exempt from tax on their capital gains in order to avoid withholding at source at the time of sale.
Taxation of Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends.
Residents of Israel are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our shares at the rate of 25%, which tax will be withheld at the source. With respect to a person who is a substantial shareholder at the time of receiving the dividend or on any date within the 12 months preceding such date, the applicable tax rate is 30%.
In case of dividends paid out of the profits of a Preferred Enterprise, the applicable tax rate is 20% for an individual and 0% for a corporation.
109

Taxation of Non-Israeli Shareholders on Receipt of Dividends.
Non-residents of Israel are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our shares at the rate of 25% or 30%, if such person (including a non-Israeli corporation) is a substantial shareholder at the time of recipient of the dividend or on any date in the 12 months preceding such date, which tax will be withheld at the source, unless a different rate is provided in a tax treaty between Israel and the shareholder’s country of residence. Under the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty) is 25% or 15% in the case of dividends paid out of the profits of an Approved Enterprise (as such term is defined in the Investment Law), subject to certain conditions. However, generally, the maximum rate of withholding tax on dividends that are paid to a U.S. corporation holding 10% or more of our outstanding voting capital throughout the tax year in which the dividend is distributed as well as the previous tax year and the dividend is not paid from the profits of an Approved Enterprise, the Israeli tax withheld may not exceed 12.5%, subject to certain conditions. A non-resident of Israel who receives dividends from which tax was withheld is generally exempt from the duty to file returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided such income was not derived from a business conducted in Israel by the taxpayer, and the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel.
In case of dividends paid out of the profits of a Preferred Enterprise, the applicable tax rate is 20%.
Residents of the United States will generally have taxes in Israel withheld at source.
110

With regards to the distribution of dividends on April 17, 2013, April 17, 2014, April 21, 2015 and April 14, 2016, we provided the following data regarding the calculation of the rate of tax being withheld at source:

Source |  | % of Dividend |  |  | Individual Tax % |  |  | Corporations Tax % |  |  | Foreign Resident Tax % |
Dividend Distributed on April 17, 2013 |
Regular Income |  |  | 34.6031 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 25 |
Benefited Enterprise |  |  | 65.3969 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |
Dividend Distributed on April 17, 2014 |
Regular Income |  |  | 52.9928 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 25 |
Benefited Enterprise |  |  | 47.0071 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 15 |
Dividend Distributed on April 21, 2015 |
Regular Income |  |  | 5.5888 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 25 |
Benefited Enterprise |  |  | 12.7771 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 15 |
Preferred Enterprise |  |  | 81.6341 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 20 |
Dividend Distributed on April 14, 2016 |
Regular Income |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 25 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 25 |
Preferred Enterprise |  |  | 100.0000 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 20 |

With regards to the distribution of dividend dated April 17, 2013, the weighted tax for individuals was 18.46031%, for corporations 9.80954%, and for foreign residents 18.46031%. With regards to the distribution of dividend dated April 17, 2014, the weighted tax for individuals was 20.29928%, for corporations 7.05108%, and for foreign residents 20.29928%. With regards to the distribution of dividend dated April 21, 2015, the weighted tax for individuals was 19.64059%, for corporations 0.00000%, and for foreign residents 19.64059 %. With regards to the distribution of dividend dated April 14, 2016, the weighted tax for individuals was 20.00000%, for corporations 0.00000%, and for foreign residents 20.00000 %.
The above noted dividend distributions with respect to the fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 are each from income sources which would not generate additional tax liability to the Company as a result of such distributions. We anticipate that any future dividends distributed pursuant to our previously announced dividend policy, will likewise be distributed from income sources which will not impose additional tax liabilities on us.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status under U.S. Federal Income Tax Law
In general, a non-U.S. corporation will be classified for U.S. tax purposes as a passive foreign investment company (hereafter also referred to as a “PFIC”) in any taxable year in which either (i) 75% or more of its gross income (including the pro-rata gross income of any company (U.S. or foreign) in which it is considered to own 25% or more of the ordinary shares by value) for the taxable year is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of all of its gross assets (including the pro-rata fair market value of the assets of any company in which it is considered to own 25% or more of the ordinary shares by value) during the taxable year, calculated quarterly by value, produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. Passive income for these purposes includes items such as dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions.
111

If we are classified as a passive foreign investment company, highly complex rules will apply to our U.S. shareholders. Accordingly, U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application of such rules.
If a corporation is a passive foreign investment company, a U.S. shareholder will be subject to one of three alternative taxing regimes:
The simplest is the “QEF” regime. If the shareholder elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then each year the shareholder includes in its gross income a proportionate share of the PFIC’s ordinary income and net capital gain. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a Qualified Election Fund election. A second regime may be elected if the PFIC stock is “marketable.” The U.S. shareholder may elect to “mark the stock to market” each year. At the end of each taxable year, the shareholder recognizes gain equal to the excess of the fair market value of the PFIC stock over the shareholder’s tax basis in the stock. (Losses may also be recognized to the extent of previously recognized gains.)
A U.S. shareholder making neither of these elections is subject to the “excess distribution” regime. The tax is triggered when the shareholder receives an “excess distribution” from the PFIC. An excess distribution is either (1) a distribution with respect to stock that is greater than 125% of the average of such distributions over the preceding three years, or (2) 100% of the gain from the disposition of shares in the PFIC.
An excess distribution is subject to special tax rules. In most cases, only a portion of it is included in the gross income of the U.S. shareholder and taxed at normal rates. The remainder is never so included, but is used as the basis for calculating a “deferred tax amount”, which is simply added to the shareholder’s tax liability.
The deferred tax amount is computed as follows. The excess distribution is first ratably allocated, share by share, to each day of the shareholder’s holding period. Portions allocated to the current year, and to any pre-PFIC years (that is, years before 1987, when there were no PFICs, or years before the first year in which the company was a PFIC with respect to that shareholder), are included in ordinary income for the current year. Portions allocated to prior PFIC years are hypothetically taxed at the highest marginal rate in effect for those years (without regard to the shareholder’s actual rate or to any deductions or credits for those years). To this hypothetical tax is added the interest that the shareholder would have paid if it were simply paying that tax late for that year. The sum of the tax and the interest charge is the deferred tax amount, which cannot be offset or otherwise affected by current net operating losses or other deductions.
A U.S. person who inherits shares in a foreign corporation that was a PFIC in the hands of the decedent (who did not make either of the elections described above), is denied the otherwise available step-up in the tax basis of such shares to fair market value at the date of death. The U.S. person steps into the shoes of the decedent and will be subject to the rules described above.
Although a determination as to a corporation’s PFIC status is made annually, an initial determination that a corporation is a PFIC for any taxable year generally will cause the above-described consequences to apply for all future years as to U.S. shareholders who held shares in the corporation at any time during the PFIC taxable year and who made neither a valid QEF election with respect to such shares nor a valid election to mark such shares to market. This will be true even if the corporation loses its PFIC status in later years. However, with respect to a PFIC that does not make any distributions or deemed distributions, the above tax treatment would apply only to gains realized on the disposition of such shares by a U.S. shareholder.
112

If we are classified as a PFIC, complicated rules will apply to our U.S. shareholders. Our status in future years will depend on our assets and activities in those years, although shareholders will be treated as continuing to own an interest in a passive foreign investment company if we are a passive foreign investment company in any year in which a shareholder owns our shares, unless certain elections are made.
This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a U.S. shareholder in light of his or her particular circumstances or to a U.S. shareholder subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law. We do not currently intend to prepare or provide the information that would enable you to make a Qualified Election Fund election. U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income taxation rules to which they will be subject, as well as the PFIC rules, including the advisability, procedure and timing of making a mark-to-market election, in connection with their holding of our shares, including warrants or rights to acquire our shares.
Certain Reporting Requirements
Certain U.S. investors are required to file IRS Form 926, Return by U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation, and certain U.S. Investors may be required to file IRS Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, reporting transfers of cash or other property to us and information relating to the U.S. investor and us. Substantial penalties may be imposed upon a U.S. investor that fails to comply. Each U.S. investor should consult its own tax advisor regarding these requirements.
In addition, recently enacted legislation imposes new reporting requirements for the holder of certain foreign financial assets, including equity of foreign entities, if the aggregate value of all of these assets exceeds certain thresholds. Our shares are expected to be subject to these new reporting requirements unless the shares are held in an account at a domestic financial institution. Penalties may apply to any failure to comply with such reporting requirements. U.S. investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of this legislation.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting Requirements
Generally, information reporting requirements will apply to distributions with respect to our shares or proceeds on the disposition of our shares paid within the United States (and, in certain cases, outside the United States) to U.S. investors other than certain exempt recipients, such as corporations. Furthermore, backup withholding (currently at 28%) may apply to such amounts if the U.S. investor fails to (i) provide a correct taxpayer identification number, (ii) report interest and dividends required to be shown on its U.S. federal income tax return, or (iii) make other appropriate certifications in the required manner. U.S. investors who are required to establish their exempt status generally must provide such certification on IRS Form W-9.
113

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as backup withholding from a payment may be credited against a U.S. investor’s U.S. federal income tax liability and such U.S. investor may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS and furnishing any required information in a timely manner.
Tax Assessment
The company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Israel, U.S.A and Denmark.
The Israeli tax returns of the Company are open for examination by the Israeli Tax Authority for tax years beginning in 2013.
The Federal tax returns of our U.S. subsidiary are open for examination by the Federal Tax Authorities for tax years beginning in 2012. The New Jersey state tax returns of the subsidiary are open to examination by the New Jersey State Tax Authority for the tax years beginning in 2011. The California State Tax returns of the U.S. subsidiary are open to examination by the California State Tax Authority for tax years beginning in 2011. The Virginia State Tax returns of the U.S. subsidiary are open to examination by the Virginia State Tax Authority for tax periods beginning in October 28, 2015.
The Danish tax returns of our Danish subsidiary are open for examination by the Danish Tax Authority for tax years beginning on September 1, 2011.
The Federal tax returns or our U.S. granddaughter company held by our Danish subsidiary, as well as its New York State tax returns and New York City tax returns, are open for examination by the Federal, New York State and New York City Tax Authorities, respectively, for tax years beginning in June 2012.
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable
G. Statement by experts
Not applicable
H. Documents on Display
We are required to file reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the regulations thereunder applicable to foreign private issuers. Although as a foreign private issuer we are not required to file periodic information as frequently or as promptly as United States companies, we generally do publicly announce our quarterly and year-end results promptly and file periodic information with the SEC under cover of Form 6-K. We are also exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and other provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
114

You may review a copy of our filings with the SEC, including any exhibits and schedules, at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. As a foreign private issuer, all documents which were filed after November 4, 2002 on the SEC's EDGAR system will be available for retrieval on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. These SEC filings are also available to the public on (i) the Israel Securities Authority’s Magna website at www.magna.isa.gov.il, (ii) the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange website at http://www.maya.tase.co.il, and (iii) from commercial document retrieval services. The documents referred to in this document may be inspected at the Company’s offices, located at 14 Atir Yeda Street, Kfar Sava, Israel 4464323.
Any statement in this annual report about any of our contracts or other documents is not necessarily complete. If the contract or document is filed as an exhibit to the annual report the contract or document is deemed to modify the description contained in this annual report. We urge you to review the exhibits themselves for a complete description of the contract or document.
Our website is http://www.silicom.co.il. We do not intend for any information contained on our internet website to be considered part of this annual report, and we have included our website address in this annual report solely as an inactive textual reference. We will post on our website any materials required to be posted on such website under applicable corporate or securities laws and regulations, including posting any XBRL interactive financial data required to be filed with the SEC, and any notices of general meetings of our shareholders.
I. Subsidiary information
Not applicable
Item 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss related to changes in market prices, including interest rates and foreign exchange rates, of financial instruments that may adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our primary market risk exposures relate to our investment portfolio and fluctuation of the exchange rate of the US Dollar, which is the primary currency in which we conduct our operations, against the NIS with respect to the Company's operations, and against the DKK and Euro with respect to Danish operations.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2015, our investment portfolio consisted of approximately 32.9 million invested in corporate debt securities and government debt securities. These securities are classified as "held to maturity". The majority of the Company's investments (approximately 30.4 million) are in fixed-rate instruments, while a small portion of its investments (approximately 2.5 million) are in variable-rate instruments. Therefore, the Company's exposure to interest rate risk from variable-rate instruments is generally very limited and not material to the Company. In addition, since the securities are "held to maturity", any changes in fair value of the Company's instruments due to fluctuations in the interest rates, that are not classified as other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI), do not affect the Company's profit or loss.
115

For quantitative information on the Company's marketable securities, please see Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
As of December 31, 2015 we did not have any short or long term interest bearing loans or debts, hence with respect to the Company's business operations, we do not have any exposure to interest rate risk.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Most of our revenues are generated in U.S. dollars. In addition, most of our costs are denominated and determined in U.S. dollars and NIS. According to the salient economic factors indicated in ASC 830 “Foreign Currency Matters” (formerly SFAS No. 52), “Foreign Currency Translation,” our cash flow, sale price, sales market, expense, financing and inter-company transactions, and arrangement indicators, are predominantly denominated in U.S. dollars, and so, the U.S. dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which we operate. Thus, the U.S. dollar is our functional and reporting currency. In our balance sheet, we re-measure into U.S. dollars all monetary accounts (principally cash and cash equivalents and liabilities) that are maintained in other currencies. For this re-measurement, we use the relevant foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Any gain or loss that results from this re-measurement is reflected in the statement of operations as appropriate. We measure and record non-monetary accounts in our balance sheet in U.S. dollars. For this measurement, we use the U.S. dollar value in effect at the date that the asset or liability was initially recorded in our balance sheet (the date of the transaction).
As of December 31, 2015 we had accounts receivable in NIS or in funds linked thereto in the amount of $1,249 thousand. Market risk was estimated as the potential decrease in balance resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase in the year-end Dollar exchange rate. Assuming such increase in the Dollar exchange rate, the balance of our accounts receivable would decrease by $114 thousand. As of December 31, 2015 we had accounts payable in NIS or linked thereto in the amount of $7,312 thousand. Market risk was estimated as the potential increase in balance resulting from a hypothetical 10% decrease in the year-end Dollar exchange rate. Assuming such decrease in the Dollar exchange rate, the balance of our accounts payable would increase by $812 thousand.
116

As of December 31, 2015, the foreign currency exchange rate risk for Silicom deriving from our accounts receivable in DKK or in Euro is negligible.
In 2015 there was an increase of 0.33% in the Dollar exchange rate to the NIS which resulted in an aggregate decrease in the fair value of our assets of $14 thousand and an aggregate decrease in the fair value of our liabilities of $31 thousand.
Since the majority of our revenues is denominated and paid in U.S. dollars, we believe that fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rate do not have a significant effect on our accounts receivable. Inflation in Israel and the Israeli currency as well as U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations may have only a limited effect on our accounts payable, as described above. Inflation in Denmark and the Danish currency as well as U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations are expected to have only a limited effect on our accounts payable.
Our operating expenses may be affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as it relates to the NIS. By way of example, a hypothetical 10% weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the currencies in which our operating expenses are denominated in 2015 would have resulted in an increase in operating expenses of approximately $1,118 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, our operating expenses may be affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as it relates to the DKK. By way of example, a hypothetical 10% weakening in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the currencies in which our operating expenses are denominated in 2015 would have resulted in an increase in operating expenses of approximately $433 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2015.
As of December 31, 2015, all of our investments, other than a portion of our cash and cash equivalents comprising a small portion of our overall investment portfolio, consisted of investments denominated in U.S. dollars, and our portfolio is therefore not subject to significant exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
As of December 31, 2015, we were not engaged in any hedging or other transactions intended to manage the risks relating to foreign currency exchange rate or interest rate fluctuations.
Credit Risk
Our investment portfolio includes held to maturity marketable securities. These securities include investments issued by highly rated corporations or investments issued by agencies of governments. As of December 31, 2015, the rating of the securities in our portfolio was at least A (except for approximately $1.9M investment in one security rated BBB+). Nonetheless, these investments are subject to general credit and counterparty risks (such as that the counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations), which were exacerbated by the recent turmoil that has affected the financial markets and the global economy and caused credit issues for a number of reputable financial institutions. Any changes in fair value of our investment securities due to credit risk do not affect our profit or loss unless there is OTTI (referred to in ASC 320-10).
117

As of December 31, 2015, we were not required to adjust the carrying value of our investment securities since there were no other-than-temporary impairments.
Item 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not Applicable.
PART II.
Item 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
Item 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
Item 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
118

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, the end of our fiscal year. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)."
Based on our assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
This annual report includes, on page F-4 of this form 20-F, an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm on management's assessment of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitation, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 15T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Not Applicable.
Item 16. Reserved
Item 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our board of directors had determined that both Ms. Ayelet Aya Hayak and Mr. Ilan Erez were our audit committee financial experts.
119

Item 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
Our company has adopted a code of ethics, which applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our Director of Finance and our Corporate Controller. A copy of the code of ethics is attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
Item 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table presents fees for professional services for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, audit-related services and tax services rendered by Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International.

|  | 2015 |  |  | 2014 |
Audit Fees(1) |  | $ | 110,000 |  |  | $ | 110,000 |
Audit-Related Fees(2) |  | $ | 22,000 |  |  | $ | 49,000 |
Tax Fees(3) |  | $ | 37,500 |  |  | $ | 28,000 |

(1) Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and services normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2) Audit-Related Fees consist of accounting consultation and consultation on financial accounting standards, not arising as part of the audit.
(3) Tax Fees are the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, other than in connection with the Audit. Tax compliance involves audit of original and amended tax returns, tax planning and tax advice.
Audit committee's pre-approval policies and procedures
We are required to obtain the approval of our audit committee (and subsequently the consent of the board of directors and shareholders) before engaging our independent auditors, Somekh Chaikin, a member firm of KPMG International, to audit our consolidated financial statements, as well as to provide other audit or permitted non-audit services to us. This policy, which is designed to assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of our auditors, requires pre-approval from the audit committee on an annual basis for the various audit and non-audit services that may be performed by our auditors. Our audit committee is not permitted to approve the engagement of our auditors for any services that would be inconsistent with maintaining the auditor's independence or that are not permitted by applicable law.
Item 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not Applicable.
120

Item 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
Not Applicable.
Item 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Not Applicable.
Item 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies as required under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market, due to an exemption that we obtained from NASDAQ as foreign private issuer which enables us to comply with our home country laws of the State of Israel, including the provisions of the Companies Law, in lieu of NASDAQ Listing Rules. Below is a concise summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the corporate governance requirements of NASDAQ applicable to domestic U.S. listed companies:

| · | We are not required to distribute annual and quarterly reports directly to shareholders, but we do make our audited financial statements available to our shareholders prior to our annual general meeting and furnish our quarterly and annual financial results with the SEC on Form 6-K.

| · | A majority of our board of directors may not necessarily be comprised of independent directors as defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules, but our board of directors contains two external directors in accordance with the Companies Law. Israeli law does not require, nor do our external directors conduct, regularly scheduled meetings at which only they are present. In addition, with the exception of our external directors, our directors are elected for terms of one year or until the following annual meeting, by a general meeting of our shareholders. The nominations for director which are presented to our shareholders are also generally made by our board of directors. Pursuant to the Companies Law, one or more shareholders of a company holding at least one percent of the voting power of the company may nominate a currently serving external director for an additional three year term. Israeli law does not require the adoption of and our board has not adopted a formal written charter or board resolution addressing the nomination process and related matters. Compensation of our directors and other officers of the Company is determined in accordance with Israeli law.

| · | Our audit committee has not adopted a formal written audit committee charter specifying the items enumerated in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(1). We believe that the members of our audit committee comply with the requirements of the Israeli law, as well as NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(3) and Rule 10A-3(b) of the general rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. For a detailed discussion please refer to "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees- Audit Committee".

121

| · | As opposed to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5620(c)(3), which sets forth a minimum quorum for a shareholders meeting, under Israeli law a company is entitled to determine in its articles of association the number of shareholders and percentage of holdings required for a quorum at a shareholders meeting. Our current articles of association provide that a quorum of two or more shareholders, present in person or by proxy, holding shares conferring in the aggregate more than thirty three and a third (33 1/3 %) percent of the voting power of the Company is required.

| · | All related party transactions are approved in accordance with the requirements and procedures for approval of interested party acts and transactions set forth in the Companies Law, and are not subject to the review process set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5630. For a detailed discussion please refer to "Item 10. Additional Information- the Companies Law".

| · | We seek shareholder approval for all corporate action requiring such approval in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Law rather than under the requirements of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, including (but not limited to) the appointment or termination of auditors, appointment and dismissal of directors, approval of interested party acts and transactions requiring general meeting approval as discussed above and a merger.

| · | We follow the provisions of the Companies Law with respect to matters in connection with the composition and responsibilities of our compensation committee, office holder compensation, and any required approval by the shareholders of such compensation. Israeli law, and our amended and restated articles of association, do not require that a compensation committee composed solely of independent members of our board of directors determine (or recommend to the board of directors for determination) an executive officer’s compensation, as required under NASDAQ listing standards related to compensation committee independence and responsibilities; nor do they require that the Company adopt and file a compensation committee charter. Instead, our compensation committee has been established and conducts itself in accordance with provisions governing the composition of and the responsibilities of a compensation committee as set forth in the Companies Law. Furthermore, the compensation of office holders is determined and approved by our compensation committee and our board of directors, and in certain circumstances by our shareholders, either in consistency with our previously approved Executive Compensation Policy or, in special circumstances in deviation therefrom, taking into account certain considerations set forth in the Companies Law. The requirements for approval by the shareholders for any office holder compensation, and the relevant majority or special majority for such approval, are all as set forth in the Companies Law. Thus, we will seek shareholder approval for all corporate actions with respect to office holder compensation requiring such approval under the requirements of the Companies Law, including seeking prior approval of the shareholders for the Executive Compensation Policy and for certain office holder compensation, rather than seeking approval for such corporate actions in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules.

122

| · | We do not necessarily seek shareholder approval for the establishment of, and amendments to, stock option or equity compensation plans (as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)), as such matters are not subject to shareholder approval under Israeli law. We will attempt to seek shareholder approval for our stock option or equity compensation plans (and the relevant annexes thereto) to the extent required in order to ensure they are tax qualified for our employees in the United States. However, if such approval is not received, then the stock option or equity compensation plans will continue to be in effect, but the Company will be unable to grant options to its U.S. employees that qualify as Incentive Stock Options for U.S. federal tax purpose. Our stock option or other equity compensation plans are also available to our non-U.S. employees, and provide features necessary to comply with applicable non-U.S. tax laws.

Item 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
PART III.
Item 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not Applicable.
Item 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See pages F-1 to F-41.
Item 19. EXHIBITS

1.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Association, adopted on January 24, 2008, filed by us as an Exhibit to our registration statement on Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

1.2 | Amendment to Articles of Association of the Registrant incorporated by reference to Proposal 5 found in Exhibit 2 to the Form 6-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference.

123

4.1 | Lease between the Company, C.P.M Medical Equipment Ltd. and Klimotech Ltd., for premises in Kfar Sava, Israel, dated December 3, 2014. As this lease is written in Hebrew, a summary is included in the Exhibit.

4.2 | Sublease Agreement between the Company and Lumenis Ltd. for the site of our manufacturing facility in Yokneam, Israel, dated August 1, 2013, and an amendment dated November 21, 2013, filed by us as an Exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference. As this sublease agreement and the amendment are written in Hebrew, a summary was included in the Exhibit.

4.3 | Lease between Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. and RAD Data Communications Inc., for space in Mahwah, New Jersey, dated as of September 1, 1997, filed by us as an Exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.4 | Sublease Agreement between Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. and Radcom Equipmet, Inc., for space in Paramus, New Jersey, dated as of February 1, 2004, filed by us as an Exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.5 | The Executive Compensation Policy of the Registrant approved by the Shareholders on July 31, 2013, filed by us as Annex A to Proposal 1 found in Exhibit 2 to the Form 6-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 26, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.6 | Share Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Fiberblaze A/S, Fiberblaze Holding APS, and Hilmer APS, dated December 10, 2014, filed by us as an Exhibit to our annual report on form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.7 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc., ADI Engineering, Inc., Steve Yates and Patricia Yates, dated September 30, 2015.

8. | List of subsidiaries.

124

11.1 | Code of Ethics, filed by us as an Exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

12.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

12.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.1 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

13.2 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

15.1 | Consent of Somekh Chaikin, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, a member firm of KPMG International.

125

SIGNATURES
The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

| SILICOM LIMITED By: /S/ Shaike Orbach Shaike Orbach Chief Executive Officer

April 26, 2016
126

Silicom Ltd.
and its Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Financial Statements
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2015

Contents

|  | Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |  | F - 3
Consolidated Balance Sheets |  | F - 4
Consolidated Statements of Operations |  | F - 6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity |  | F - 7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |  | F - 8
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |  | F - 9

F - 2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Silicom Ltd.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Silicom Ltd. and subsidiaries (hereinafter - “the Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
March 21, 2016
F - 3

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31

|  |  |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | Note |  |  | US$ thousands |  |  | US$ thousands |
Assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current assets |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents |  | 4 |  |  |  | 17,890 |  |  |  | 18,178 |
Short-term bank deposits |  | 2F |  |  |  | 4,000 |  |  |  | - |
Marketable securities |  | 2G, 5 |  |  |  | 15,167 |  |  |  | 8,636 |
Accounts receivable: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade, net |  | 2H |  |  |  | 18,441 |  |  |  | 23,295 |
Other |  |  |  |  |  | 1,632 |  |  |  | 1,380 |
Related parties |  |  |  |  |  | 390 |  |  |  | 473 |
Inventories |  | 6 |  |  |  | 25,449 |  |  |  | 26,321 |
Deferred tax assets |  | 14G |  |  |  | 567 |  |  |  | 950 |
Total current assets |  |  |  |  |  | 83,536 |  |  |  | 79,233 |
Marketable securities |  | 2G, 5 |  |  |  | 20,358 |  |  |  | 24,246 |
Assets held for employees' severance benefits |  | 9 |  |  |  | 1,425 |  |  |  | 1,374 |
Deferred tax assets |  | 14G |  |  |  | 346 |  |  |  | 595 |
Property, plant and equipment ("PPE"), net |  | 7 |  |  |  | 2,458 |  |  |  | 3,825 |
Intangible assets, net |  | 8B |  |  |  | 2,071 |  |  |  | 5,164 |
Goodwill |  | 8A |  |  |  | 12,242 |  |  |  | 25,561 |
Total assets |  |  |  |  |  | 122,436 |  |  |  | 139,998 |

Avi Eizenman |  | Shaike Orbach |  | Eran Gilad
Chairman of the Board of Directors |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer

Kfar-Saba, Israel
March 21, 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 4

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 (Continued)

|  |  |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | Note |  |  | US$ thousands |  |  | US$ thousands |
Liabilities and shareholders' equity |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Trade accounts payable |  |  |  |  |  | 8,216 |  |  |  | 8,544 |
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses |  |  |  |  |  | 5,783 |  |  |  | 11,147 |
Contingent consideration |  | 3 |  |  |  | 4,728 |  |  |  | - |
Related parties |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 12 |
Deferred tax liabilities |  | 14G |  |  |  | 259 |  |  |  | 111 |
Total current liabilities |  |  |  |  |  | 19,006 |  |  |  | 19,814 |
Long-term liabilities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Contingent consideration |  | 3 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 4,942 |
Liability for employees' severance benefits |  | 9 |  |  |  | 2,414 |  |  |  | 2,251 |
Deferred tax liabilities |  | 14G |  |  |  | 284 |  |  |  | 157 |
Total liabilities |  |  |  |  |  | 21,704 |  |  |  | 27,164 |
Commitments and contingencies |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Shareholders' equity |  | 11 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Ordinary shares, ILS 0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
authorized; 7,233,604 and 7,299,315 issued as at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively; |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
7,218,633 and 7,284,344 outstanding as at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 21 |
Additional paid-in capital |  |  |  |  |  | 41,245 |  |  |  | 44,101 |
Treasury shares (at cost) - 14,971 ordinary shares as at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2014 and 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | (38 | ) |  |  | (38 | )
Retained earnings |  |  |  |  |  | 59,504 |  |  |  | 68,750 |
Total shareholders' equity |  |  |  |  |  | 100,732 |  |  |  | 112,834 |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |  |  |  |  |  | 122,436 |  |  |  | 139,998 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 5

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31

|  |  |  |  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  |  |  |  | US$ thousands |
|  | Note |  |  | Except for share and per share data |
Sales* |  | 12 |  |  |  | 73,298 |  |  |  | 75,622 |  |  |  | 82,738 |
Cost of sales |  |  |  |  |  | 43,865 |  |  |  | 44,835 |  |  |  | 48,659 |
Gross profit |  |  |  |  |  | 29,433 |  |  |  | 30,787 |  |  |  | 34,079 |
Operating expenses |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Research and development** |  |  |  |  |  | 5,465 |  |  |  | 6,480 |  |  |  | 9,702 |
Sales and marketing |  |  |  |  |  | 3,818 |  |  |  | 4,418 |  |  |  | 5,651 |
General and administrative |  |  |  |  |  | 2,572 |  |  |  | 2,798 |  |  |  | 3,611 |
Contingent consideration expense (benefit) |  | 3 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | (3,090 | )
Total operating expenses |  |  |  |  |  | 11,855 |  |  |  | 13,741 |  |  |  | 15,874 |
Operating income |  |  |  |  |  | 17,578 |  |  |  | 17,046 |  |  |  | 18,205 |
Financial income, net |  | 13 |  |  |  | 404 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 220 |
Income before income taxes |  |  |  |  |  | 17,982 |  |  |  | 17,309 |  |  |  | 18,425 |
Income taxes |  | 14 |  |  |  | 905 |  |  |  | 2,704 |  |  |  | 1,905 |
Net income |  |  |  |  |  | 17,077 |  |  |  | 14,605 |  |  |  | 16,520 |
Income per share: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Basic income per ordinary share (US$) |  | 2T |  |  |  | 2.404 |  |  |  | 2.033 |  |  |  | 2.273 |
Diluted income per ordinary share (US$) |  |  |  |  |  | 2.357 |  |  |  | 1.996 |  |  |  | 2.242 |
Weighted average number of ordinary |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
shares used to compute basic income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
per share (in thousands) |  |  |  |  |  | 7,103 |  |  |  | 7,184 |  |  |  | 7,269 |
Weighted average number of ordinary |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
shares used to compute diluted income |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
per share (in thousands) |  |  |  |  |  | 7,246 |  |  |  | 7,319 |  |  |  | 7,368 |

* Including sales to related parties in the amount of US$ 851 thousand, US$ 1,041 thousand and US$ 1,154 thousand in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.
** Including services from related parties in the amount of US$ 133 thousand, US$ 243 thousand and US$ 285 thousand in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 6

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

|  | Ordinary shares |  |  | Additional paid-in capital |  |  | Treasury shares |  |  | Retained earnings |  |  | Total shareholders’ equity |
|  | Number of shares(1) |  |  | US$ thousands |
Balance at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
January 1, 2013 |  |  | 7,007,426 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 36,065 |  |  |  | (38 | ) |  |  | 38,918 |  |  |  | 74,966 |
Exercise of options |  |  | 132,587 |  |  |  | *- |  |  |  | 1,893 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,893 |
Share-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 668 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 668 |
Dividend (US $0.55 per share) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (3,913 | ) |  |  | (3,913 | )
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 17,077 |  |  |  | 17,077 |
Balance at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2013 |  |  | 7,140,013 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 38,626 |  |  |  | (38 | ) |  |  | 52,082 |  |  |  | 90,691 |
Exercise of options |  |  | 78,620 |  |  |  | *- |  |  |  | 1,353 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,353 |
Share-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,266 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,266 |
Dividend (US $1.00 per share) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (7,183 | ) |  |  | (7,183 | )
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 14,605 |  |  |  | 14,605 |
Balance at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2014 |  |  | 7,218,633 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 41,245 |  |  |  | (38 | ) |  |  | 59,504 |  |  |  | 100,732 |
Exercise of options and RSUs(2) |  |  | 65,711 |  |  |  | *- |  |  |  | 943 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 943 |
Share-based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,913 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 1,913 |
Dividend (US $1.00 per share) |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (7,274 | ) |  |  | (7,274 | )
Net income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 16,520 |  |  |  | 16,520 |
Balance at |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
December 31, 2015 |  |  | 7,284,344 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 44,101 |  |  |  | (38 | ) |  |  | 68,750 |  |  |  | 112,834 |

(1) | Net of 14,971 shares held by Silicom Inc. |  |
(2) | Restricted share units (hereinafter - "RSUs") |  |
* | Less than 1 thousand. |  |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 7

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31

|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Cash flows from operating activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income |  |  | 17,077 |  |  |  | 14,605 |  |  |  | 16,520 |
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
net cash provided by operating activities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Depreciation and amortization |  |  | 659 |  |  |  | 996 |  |  |  | 2,767 |
Write-down of obsolete inventory |  |  | 1,926 |  |  |  | 1,029 |  |  |  | 219 |
Liability for employees' severance benefits, net |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | (86 | ) |  |  | (112 | )
Discount on marketable securities, net |  |  | 729 |  |  |  | 758 |  |  |  | 561 |
Share-based compensation expense |  |  | 668 |  |  |  | 1,266 |  |  |  | 1,998 |
Deferred taxes |  |  | (552 | ) |  |  | (219 | ) |  |  | (907 | )
Capital (gain) loss |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (3 | )
Changes in assets and liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Accounts receivable - trade |  |  | (2,322 | ) |  |  | (3,248 | ) |  |  | (4,850 | )
Accounts receivable - other |  |  | (114 | ) |  |  | 188 |  |  |  | 127 |
Accounts receivable - related parties |  |  | (139 | ) |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (83 | )
Inventories |  |  | (15,909 | ) |  |  | 3,416 |  |  |  | (939 | )
Trade accounts payable |  |  | (1,474 | ) |  |  | 1,321 |  |  |  | 234 |
Other accounts payable and accrued expenses |  |  | 1,220 |  |  |  | 649 |  |  |  | 853 |
Contingent consideration adjustments |  |  | - |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  | (3,090 | )
Accounts payable - related parties |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | (30 | ) |  |  | (8 | )
Net cash provided by operating activities |  |  | 1,918 |  |  |  | 20,684 |  |  |  | 13,287 |
Cash flows from investing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Proceeds from (investments in) short term bank deposits, net |  |  | (473 | ) |  |  | (1,000 | ) |  |  | 4,000 |
Sale of property, plant and equipment |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 19 |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |  |  | (822 | ) |  |  | (1,858 | ) |  |  | (2,984 | )
Investment in intangible assets |  |  | (100 | ) |  |  | (100 | ) |  |  | - |
Proceeds from maturity of marketable securities |  |  | 12,500 |  |  |  | 14,750 |  |  |  | 15,100 |
Purchases of marketable securities |  |  | (11,384 | ) |  |  | (11,740 | ) |  |  | (12,935 | )
Business acquisition, net of acquired cash (see Note 3) |  |  | - |  |  |  | (10,048 | ) |  |  | (10,000 | )
Net cash used in investing activities |  |  | (279 | ) |  |  | (9,996 | ) |  |  | (6,800 | )
Cash flows from financing activities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercise of options |  |  | 1,893 |  |  |  | 1,353 |  |  |  | 943 |
Dividend |  |  | (3,913 | ) |  |  | (7,183 | ) |  |  | (7,274 | )
Net cash used in financing activities |  |  | (2,020 | ) |  |  | (5,830 | ) |  |  | (6,331 | )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held |  |  | 72 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 132 |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |  |  | (309 | ) |  |  | 4,893 |  |  |  | 288 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |  |  | 13,306 |  |  |  | 12,997 |  |  |  | 17,890 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |  |  | 12,997 |  |  |  | 17,890 |  |  |  | 18,178 |
Supplementary cash flow information |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
A. Non-cash transactions: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Investments in PPE and intangible assets |  |  | 207 |  |  |  | 87 |  |  |  | 72 |
B. Cash paid during the year for: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Income taxes |  |  | 2,154 |  |  |  | 1,277 |  |  |  | 4,487 |

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F - 8

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - General
Silicom Ltd. is an Israeli corporation engaged in designing, manufacturing, marketing and supporting high performance networking and data infrastructure solutions for a broad range of servers, server based systems and communications devices.
The Company’s shares have been traded in the United States on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System ("NASDAQ”) since February 1994. Since January 2, 2014 the Company's shares have been traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (prior thereto they were traded on the NASDAQ Global Market). The Company’s shares had been traded in Israel on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ("TASE"), since December 2005. Since June 16, 2013 the Company's shares had been included in the Tel-Aviv 100 Index. In January 28, 2016, the Company delisted from trading in the TASE.
Silicom markets its products directly, through Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) which sell the Company’s connectivity products under their own private labels or incorporate the Company’s products into their products.
In these financial statements the terms "Company" or "Silicom" refer to Silicom Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. (hereinafter - "Silicom Inc.") and Fiberblaze A/S, (hereinafter - "Fiberblaze"), whereas the term "subsidiaries" refers to Silicom Inc. and Fiberblaze.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies, which are applied consistently throughout the periods presented, are as follows:

| A. | Financial statements in US dollars

Substantially all sales of the Company are made outside of Israel (see Note 12A regarding geographical distribution), in US dollars ("dollars"). Most purchases of materials and components, and a significant part of the marketing costs are made or incurred, primarily in dollars. Therefore, the functional currency of the Company is the dollar.
Transactions and monetary balances in other currencies are translated into the functional currency using the current exchange rate.
All exchange gains and losses from remeasurement of monetary balance sheet items denominated in non-dollar currencies are reflected in earnings when they arise.
F - 9

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| B. | Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

| C. | Estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the useful lives of PPE, deferred tax assets, inventory, investments, goodwill, intangible assets, share-based compensation and other contingencies.

| D. | Business combinations

The Company accounts for business combination in accordance with ASC No. 805, "Business Combinations". ASC No. 805 requires recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. Any excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over purchase price and any subsequent changes in estimated contingencies are to be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

| E. | Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of deposit to be cash equivalents.

| F. | Short-term bank deposits

Short term bank deposits consist of bank deposits with original maturities of more than three months and up to twelve months.

| G. | Marketable securities

The Company classifies its marketable securities as held-to-maturity as they are debt securities in which the Company has the intent and ability to hold to maturity. Held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities are recorded at amortized cost adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts.
Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized or accreted over the life of the related held-to-maturity security as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method.
F - 10

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| G. | Marketable securities (cont’d)

Such amortization and accretion is included in the "Financial income, net" line item in the consolidated statements of operations.
When other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss.
A decline in the market value of HTM security below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in an impairment to reduce the carrying amount to fair value. To determine whether an impairment is other than temporary, the Company considers all available information relevant to the collectibility of the security, including past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts when developing estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year end, forecasted performance of the investee, and the general market condition in the geographic area or industry the investee operates in.
If the Company intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings.

| H. | Trade accounts receivable, net

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts collected on trade accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio. In establishing the required allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market conditions and its customers’ financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, and the current receivables aging and current payment patterns.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the provision for doubtful accounts receivable amounted to US$ 20 thousand.

| I. | Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the "weighted average-cost" method. The Company writes down obsolete or slow moving inventory to its market value, on a quarterly basis.
F - 11

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| J. | Assets held for employees’ severance benefits

Assets held for employees’ severance benefits represent contributions to severance pay funds and cash surrender value of insurance policies. The assets are recorded at their current cash redemption value.

| K. | Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets at the following annual rates:

|  | % |
Machinery and equipment |  |  | 15 - 33 |
Office furniture and equipment |  |  | 6 - 33 |
Leasehold improvements |  |  | 10 - 20 |

| L. | Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill reflects the excess of the purchase price of business acquired over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but instead is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
The Company operates in one operating segment and this segment comprises one reporting unit.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 provides an entity the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount prior to performing the two-step goodwill impairment test. If this is the case, the two-step goodwill impairment test is required. If it is more likely than-not that the fair value of a reporting is greater than its carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.
If the two-step goodwill impairment test is required, first, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying amount (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the entity must perform step two of the impairment test (measurement). Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, step two does not need to be performed. During the year ended December 31, 2015, no impairments were found and therefore no impairment losses were recorded.
F - 12

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| L. | Goodwill and other intangible assets (cont’d)

Intangible assets that are not considered to have an indefinite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful lives of up to 3 years. The acquired customer relationships, current technology, intellectual property and backlog are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits realized. This accounting policy results in amortization of such intangible assets in the straight-line method.

| M. | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets Subsections of FASB ASC Subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment - Overall long-lived assets, such as property, plant, equipment and purchase intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or an asset group to be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

| N. | Revenue recognition

Revenues from sales of products are recognized upon delivery provided that the collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, no significant obligations in respect of installation remain and the price is fixed or determinable.
Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and, therefore, are excluded from revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

| O. | Research and development costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
F - 13

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| P. | Allowance for product warranty

The Company grants service warranties related to certain products to end-users. The Company estimates its obligation for such warranties to be immaterial on the basis of historical experience. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include an accrual for warranty obligations.

| Q. | Treasury shares

Treasury shares are recorded at cost and presented as a reduction of shareholders' equity.

| R. | Income taxes

Deferred taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method based on the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

| S. | Share-based compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense based on estimated grant date fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation -Stock Compensation as follows: When portions of an award vest in increments during the requisite service period (graded-vesting award), the Company’s accounting policy is to recognize compensation cost for the award over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.

| T. | Basic and diluted earnings per share

Basic income per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding. Diluted income per ordinary share calculation is similar to basic income per ordinary share except that the weighted average of common shares outstanding is increased to include outstanding potential common shares during the period if dilutive. Potential common shares arise from stock options and RSUs, and the dilutive effect is reflected by the application of the treasury stock method.
F - 14

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| T. | Basic and diluted earnings per share (cont’d)

The following table summarizes information related to the computation of basic and diluted income per ordinary share for the years indicated.

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
Net income attributable to ordinary shares |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
(US$ thousands) |  |  | 17,077 |  |  |  | 14,605 |  |  |  | 16,520 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
used in basic income per ordinary share calculation |  |  | 7,103,021 |  |  |  | 7,184,114 |  |  |  | 7,268,536 |
Add assumed exercise of outstanding dilutive potential |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
ordinary shares |  |  | 143,011 |  |  |  | 134,792 |  |  |  | 99,448 |
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
used in diluted income per ordinary share calculation |  |  | 7,246,032 |  |  |  | 7,318,906 |  |  |  | 7,367,984 |
Basic income per ordinary shares (US$) |  |  | 2.404 |  |  |  | 2.033 |  |  |  | 2.273 |
Diluted income per ordinary shares (US$) |  |  | 2.357 |  |  |  | 1.996 |  |  |  | 2.242 |
The weighted average number of shares related to options |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
and RSUs excluded from the diluted earnings per share |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
calculation because of anti-dilutive effect |  |  | - |  |  |  | 37,304 |  |  |  | 43,181 |

| U. | Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, comprehensive income equals net income.

| V. | Fair Value Measurements

The Company's financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits, marketable securities, trade and other receivables and trade accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments, except for marketable securities, approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these investments. The fair value of marketable securities is presented in Note 5 to these consolidated financial statements. Assets held for severance benefits are recorded at their current cash redemption value.
F - 15

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| V. | Fair Value Measurements (cont’d)

The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels:
Level 1 Inputs: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs: Other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 Inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at measurement date.

| W. | Concentrations of risks

| (1) | Credit risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits, marketable securities, trade receivables and assets held for employees’ severance benefits. Cash and cash equivalents balances of the Company, which are subject to credit risk, consist of cash accounts held with major financial institutions. Short-term bank deposits balances of the Company, which are subject to credit risk, consist of short-term bank deposits held with a major Israeli Bank. Marketable securities consist of held to maturity marketable securities issued by highly rated corporations. As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the ratings of the securities in the Company's portfolio were at least BBB+. Nonetheless, these investments are subject to general credit and counterparty risks (such as that the counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations). Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the Company’s diverse customer base and their wide geographical dispersion. The Company closely monitors extensions of credit and has never experienced significant credit losses.

| (2) | Significant customers

The Company depends on a small amount of customers for its products. The Company's top three customers accounted for approximately 35% of its revenues in 2015. The Company expects that a small number of customers will continue to account for a significant portion of its revenues for the foreseeable future.

| X. | Liabilities for loss contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
F - 16

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont’d)

| Y. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements

| (1) | In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The standard can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

| (2) | In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, which, for entities that do not measure inventory using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory method, changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU also eliminates the requirement for these entities to consider replacement cost or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin when measuring inventory. This ASU is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual period.

| (3) | In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust the financial statements for measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. The ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted.

| (4) | In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which requires entities with a classified balance sheet to present all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

| (5) | In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize most of their leases on balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted.

F - 17

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3 – Acquisitions

| A. | ADI Engineering, Inc.

On October 28, 2015 (hereinafter – "closing date") the Company acquired certain assets from ADI Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter – "ADI"), a privately-held, US-based provider of custom embedded communications and networking products, for an aggregate purchase price of US$ 10,000 thousand in cash and estimated contingent consideration of US$ 7,802 thousand in cash and in options to ordinary shares, payable in three yearly payments, after the closing, subject to the attainment of certain performance milestones until December 31, 2017. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration is classified at level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 2V). Of the total purchase price of US$ 17,802 thousand, US$ 222 thousand was attributed to tangible assets, US$ 4,261 thousand was attributed to intangible assets and US$ 13,319 thousand was attributed to goodwill. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. The goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes for 10 years.
If new information is obtained within one year from the acquisition date about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date, the Company will retrospectively adjust the relevant amounts that were recognized at the time of the acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition have not been presented because it is not material to the consolidated results of operations.
In connection with the first contingent payment consideration, the Company is obligated to pay ADI an amount of US$ 3,000 thousand as the first milestone was achieved. This obligation is included as part of the other accounts payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet. In addition, the company maintains a US$ 4,942 thousand liability on its balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 in connection with the contingent consideration.

| B. | Fiberblaze

On December 10, 2014 (hereinafter – "closing date"), the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares and voting interests of Fiberblaze, a provider of high performance application acceleration solutions, for an aggregate purchase price of US$ 10,161 thousand in cash and estimated contingent consideration of US$ 4,683 thousand in cash and in options to ordinary shares, subject to the attainment of certain performance milestones until August 31, 2015. The fair value measurement of the contingent consideration is classified at level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 2V). Of the total estimated purchase price of US$ 14,844 thousand, US$ 2,022 thousand was attributed to tangible assets, US$ 1,996 thousand was attributed to intangible assets, US$ 12,242 thousand was attributed to goodwill and US$ 1,416 was attributed to liabilities assumed. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition have not been presented because it is not material to the consolidated results of operations.
In connection with the contingent payment consideration, the Company is obligate to pay to the Fiberblaze sellers an amount of US$ 1,498 thousand as the milestones were partly achieved. This obligation is included as part of the other accounts payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet.
F - 18

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Cash and Cash Equivalents |  |  |  |

|  | December 31 |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Cash |  |  | 14,172 |  |  |  | 12,329 |
Cash equivalents * |  |  | 3,718 |  |  |  | 5,849 |
|  |  | 17,890 |  |  |  | 18,178 |

* | Comprised mainly of deposits in banks as at December 31, 2014 and 2015 carrying a weighted average interest rate of 0.14% and 0.11%, respectively.

F - 19

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 - Marketable Securities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

The Company's investment in marketable securities as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 are classified as “held-to-maturity” and consist of the following:

|  |  |  |  | Gross |  |  | Gross |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | unrealized |  |  | unrealized |  |  |  |
|  | Amortized |  |  | holding |  |  | holding |  |  | Aggregate |
|  | cost basis** |  |  | gains |  |  | (losses) |  |  | fair value* |
|  | US$ thousands |
At December 31, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Held to maturity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  | 8,720 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (90 | ) |  |  | 8,630 |
Non-Current |  |  | 24,418 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (255 | ) |  |  | 24,163 |
|  |  | 33,138 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (345 | ) |  |  | 32,793 |
At December 31, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Held to maturity: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Corporate debt securities |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Current |  |  | 15,328 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (69 | ) |  |  | 15,259 |
Non-Current |  |  | 20,536 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (271 | ) |  |  | 20,265 |
|  |  | 35,864 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (340 | ) |  |  | 35,524 |

* | Fair value is being determined using quoted market prices in active markets (Level 1). |
** | Including accrued interest in the amount of US$ 339 thousand and US$ 256 thousand as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 respectively. The accrued interest is presented as part of other account receivable on the balance sheet. |

Activity in marketable securities in 2015 |  | US$ thousands |
Balance at January 1, 2015 |  |  | 35,864 |
Purchases of marketable securities |  |  | 12,935 |
Discount on marketable securities, net |  |  | (561 | )
Proceeds from maturity of marketable securities |  |  | (15,100 | )
Balance at December 31, 2015 |  |  | 33,138 |

F - 20

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 - Marketable Securities (Cont’d) |  |

The following table summarizes the gross unrealized losses on investment securities for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized and the fair value of those securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2015:

|  | Less than 12 months |  |  | 12 months or more |  |  | Total |
|  | Unrealized Losses |  |  | Fair value |  |  | Unrealized Losses |  |  | Fair value |  |  | Unrealized Losses |  |  | Fair value |
Held to maturity:
Corporate debt securities |  |  | (138 | ) |  |  | 12,789 |  |  |  | (207 | ) |  |  | 20,004 |  |  |  | (345 | ) |  |  | 32,793 |

The unrealized losses on the investments were caused by changes in interest rate. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until maturity and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any of the securities before recovery; therefore these investments are not considered other than temporarily impaired.

Note 6 - Inventories |  |  |  |  |

|  | December 31 |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Raw materials and components |  |  | 8,275 |  |  |  | 9,598 |
Products in process |  |  | 11,263 |  |  |  | 9,013 |
Finished products |  |  | 5,911 |  |  |  | 7,710 |
|  |  | 25,449 |  |  |  | 26,321 |

F - 21

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 7 - Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |  |  |  |  |

|  | December 31 |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Machinery and equipment |  |  | 5,338 |  |  |  | 6,906 |
Office furniture and equipment |  |  | 433 |  |  |  | 608 |
Leasehold improvements |  |  | 1,023 |  |  |  | 2,205 |
Property, plant and equipment |  |  | 6,794 |  |  |  | 9,719 |
Accumulated depreciation |  |  | (4,336 | ) |  |  | (5,894 | )
Property, Plant and equipment, net |  |  | 2,458 |  |  |  | 3,825 |

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were US$ 639 thousand, US$ 891 thousand and US$ 1,599 thousand, respectively.
F - 22

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

A. | Goodwill

Changes in goodwill as of December 31, 2015 are as follows:

|  | US$ thousands |
Balance at January 1, 2014 |  |  | - |
Business acquisition (see Note 3B) |  |  | 12,242 |
Balance at January 1, 2015 |  |  | 12,242 |
Business acquisition (see Note 3A) |  |  | 13,319 |
Balance at December 31, 2015 |  |  | 25,561 |

B. | Other intangible assets

Net other intangible assets as of December 31, 2015 are as follows:

|  |  |  |  | December 31 |
|  |  |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | Useful life |  |  | US$ thousands |
Original cost: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Intellectual property |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 200 |  |  |  | 200 |
Current technology |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 1,456 |  |  |  | 3,833 |
Customer relationships |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 540 |  |  |  | 1,937 |
Backlog |  |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 487 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,196 |  |  |  | 6,457 |
Accumulated amortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Intellectual property |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87 |  |  |  | 154 |
Current technology |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 654 |
Customer relationships |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 272 |
Backlog |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 213 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 125 |  |  |  | 1,293 |
Other intangible assets, Net: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Intellectual property |  |  |  |  |  |  | 113 |  |  |  | 46 |
Current technology |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,428 |  |  |  | 3,179 |
Customer relationships |  |  |  |  |  |  | 530 |  |  |  | 1,665 |
Backlog |  |  |  |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 274 |
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,071 |  |  |  | 5,164 |

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were US$ 20 thousand, US$ 105 thousand and US$ 1,168 thousand, respectively.
F - 23

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9 - Assets Held and Liability for Employees' Severance Benefits

| A. | Under Israeli law and labor agreements, Silicom is required to make severance payments to retired or dismissed employees and to employees leaving employment in certain other circumstances.

In respect of the liability to the employees, individual insurance policies are purchased and deposits are made with recognized severance pay funds.
The liability for severance pay is calculated on the basis of the latest salary paid to each employee multiplied by the number of years of employment. The liability is covered by the amounts deposited including accumulated income thereon as well as by the unfunded provision.

| B. | According to Section 14 to the Severance Pay Law ("Section 14") the payment of monthly deposits by a company into recognized severance and pension funds or insurance policies releases it from any additional severance obligation to the employees that have entered into agreements with the company pursuant to such Section 14. Commencing July 1, 2008, the Company has entered into agreements with a majority of its employees in order to implement Section 14. Therefore, as of that date, the payment of monthly deposits by the Company into recognized severance and pension funds or insurance policies releases it from any additional severance obligation to those employees that have entered into such agreements and therefore the Company incurs no additional liability since that date with respect to such employees. Amounts accumulated in the pension funds or insurance policies pursuant to Section 14 are not supervised or administrated by the Company and therefore neither such amounts nor the corresponding accrual are reflected in the balance sheet.

| C. | Consequently, the assets held for employees' severance benefits reported on the balance sheet, in respect of deposits for those employees who have signed agreements pursuant to Section 14, represent the redemption value of deposits made through June 30, 2008. The liability for employee severance benefits, with respect to those employees, represents the liability of the Company for employees' severance benefits as of June 30, 2008.

As a result of the implementation of Section 14, as described above, the liability with respect to those employees is calculated on the basis of number of years of employment as of June 30, 2008, multiplied by the latest salary paid. The liability is covered by the amounts deposited, including accumulated income thereon, as well as by the unfunded provision. Such liability will be removed, either upon termination of employment or retirement.

| D. | Expenses recorded with respect to employees' severance payments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were US$ 578 thousand, US$ 432 thousand and US$ 543 thousand, respectively.

F - 24

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies

Lease commitments

The premises and facilities occupied by the Company are leased under various operating lease agreements. Furthermore, the Company has entered into several operating lease agreements for motor vehicles in Israel.

The agreements related to leases in Israel are in Israeli Shekel (“ILS”) or in ILS, linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index or to the US Dollars. The agreements related to leases in the USA are in US Dollars and the agreements related to leases in Denmark are in Danish Krone (“DKK”).

The minimum future rental payments under the above leases at exchange rates in effect on December 31, 2015, are as follows:

Year ended December 31 |  |  | US$ thousands |
2016 |  |  |  | 1,434 |
2017 |  |  |  | 582 |
2018 and on |  |  |  | 861 |

Of the amounts above, US$ 24 thousand in 2016, relate to related parties.
Rental expenses under the lease agreements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 were US$ 837 thousand, US$ 1,243 thousand and US$ 1,403 thousand, respectively.
F - 25

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity
Share based compensation

| A. | On July 21, 2004, the Board resolved, subject to shareholders’ approval that was given on December 30, 2004, to adopt the Share Option Plan (2004) (the "2004 Plan"). Option grants to employees under the 2004 Plan, including terms of vesting and the exercise price, are subject to the Board of Directors' approval. Option grants to directors and certain other officers are generally subject to the approvals of the Compensation Committee as well as Board of Directors, and grants to directors or a CEO will also generally have to be approved by the Shareholders. The term of the options shall not exceed 10 years from the date that the option was granted.

The 2004 Plan initially covered up to 282,750 options and subsequent to an amendment by the board in 2007 it covered up to 582,750 options. In August 2012, the Board of Directors increased the number of the ordinary shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan by an additional 500,000. All options are at a conversion rate of 1:1.
On October 21, 2013 the Board resolved to adopt the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013) (the "2013 Plan") and to reserve up to 500,000 ordinary shares for issuance under the 2013 Plan to employees, directors, officers and consultants of the Company or of any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company. Grants under the 2013 Plan, whether as options, restricted stock units, restricted stock or other equity based awards, including their terms, are subject to the Board of Directors' approval. Grants to directors and certain other officers are generally subject to the approvals of the Compensation Committee as well as Board of Directors, and grants to directors or a CEO (and under certain circumstances certain other officers) will also have to be approved by the Shareholders.

| B. | Options or RSUs granted to Israeli residents may be granted under Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance pursuant to which the awards of options, or the ordinary shares issued upon their exercise, must be deposited with a trustee for at least two years following the date of grant. Under Section 102, any tax payable by an employee from the grant or exercise of the awards is deferred until the transfer of the awards or ordinary shares by the trustee to the employee or upon the sale of the awards or ordinary shares. Capital gains on awards granted under the plans are subjected to tax of 25% to be paid by the employee, and the Company is not entitled to a tax deduction. Gains which are not capital gains on awards under the plans are subjected to regular tax rates on individuals, and the Company is entitled to a tax deduction for such gains.

F - 26

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd)
Share based compensation (cont'd)

| C. | During 2014 and 2015, the Company granted 74,000 and 8,000 RSUs respectively to certain of its directors, employees and consultants under the 2013 Plan. In relation to those grants:

| 1. | The vesting period of the RSUs ranges between 2 to 3 years from the date of grant.

| 2. | The fair value of RSUs is estimated based on the market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, less an estimate of dividends that will not accrue to RSUs holders prior to vesting.

| 3. | The Company recognizes compensation expenses on these RSUs based on estimated grant date fair value, with the following assumptions:

|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
Expected dividend yield |  |  | 2.06% |  |  |  | 3.22% |
Termination rate |  |  | 4.35% |  |  |  | 0% |

F - 27

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd)
Share based compensation (cont'd)

| D. | On July 28, 2015, the Company granted, in the aggregate, 89,907 options to certain of its directors and employees under the 2013 Plan. In relation to this grant:

| 1. | The exercise price for the options (per ordinary share) was US$ 26.91 and the Option expiration date was the earlier to occur of: (a) July 28, 2023; and (b) the closing price of the shares falling below US$ 13.46 at any time after the date of grant. The options vest and become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant.

| 2. | The Company recognizes compensation expenses on these options based on estimated grant date fair value using the Binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Average Risk-free interest rate (a) |  |  | 2.08% |
Expected dividend yield |  |  | 2.09% |
Average expected volatility (b) |  |  | 53.01% |
Termination rate |  |  | 9% |
Suboptimal rate (c) |  |  | 3.4% |

(a) | Risk-free interest rate represents risk free US$ zero-coupon US Government Bonds at time of grant.
(b) | Expected average volatility represents a weighted average standard deviation rate for the price of the Company’s ordinary shares on the NASDAQ National Market.
(c) | Suboptimal rate represents the multiple of the increase in the market share price on the day of grant of the option which, should it come to pass, will lead to exercise of the option by the employee. It is the average suboptimal rate of the Company and similar companies.

F - 28

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd) |

Share based compensation (cont'd)

| E. | The following table summarizes information regarding stock options as at December 31, 2015:

|  |  | Options outstanding |  |  | Options exercisable |
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted average |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted average |
|  |  |  |  |  | remaining |  |  |  |  |  | remaining |
Exercise price |  |  | Number |  |  | contractual life |  |  | Number |  |  | contractual life |
US$ |  |  | of options |  |  | (in years) |  |  | of options |  |  | (in years) |
15.28 |  |  |  | 129,044 |  |  |  | 4.7 |  |  |  | 129,044 |  |  |  | 4.7 |
26.91 |  |  |  | 85,657 |  |  |  | 7.6 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |
|  |  |  | 214,701 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 129,044 |  |  |  |  |

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 is US$ 3,825 thousand and US$ 2,229 thousand, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 is US$ 1,556 thousand and US$ 1,938 thousand, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, is US$ 2,400 thousand and US$ 1,785 thousand, respectively.
The intrinsic value of the options at the date of grant is zero.

F - 29

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd) |

Share based compensation (cont'd)

F. The stock option activity under the abovementioned plans is as follows:

|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted |
|  |  |  |  | Weighted |  |  | average |
|  | Number |  |  | average |  |  | grant date |
|  | of options |  |  | exercise price |  |  | fair value |
|  |  |  |  | US$ |  |  | US$ |
Balance at January 1, 2013 |  |  | 413,087 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  |  | (132,587 | ) |  |  | 14.28 |  |  |  | 6.61 |
Forfeited |  |  | (7,750 | ) |  |  | 15.28 |  |  |  | 6.54 |
Balance at December 31, 2013 |  |  | 272,750 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercised |  |  | (78,620 | ) |  |  | 17.19 |  |  |  | 7.70 |
Forfeited |  |  | (2,000 | ) |  |  | 15.28 |  |  |  | 6.54 |
Balance at December 31, 2014 |  |  | 192,130 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  |  | 89,907 |  |  |  | 26.91 |  |  |  | 10.04 |
Exercised |  |  | (61,711 | ) |  |  | 15.28 |  |  |  | 6.54 |
Forfeited |  |  | (5,625 | ) |  |  | 24.07 |  |  |  | 9.19 |
Balance at December 31, 2015 |  |  | 214,701 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Exercisable at December 31, 2015 |  |  | 129,044 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

F - 30

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd)

Share based compensation (cont'd)

| G. | The Restricted Share Units activity under the abovementioned plans is as follows:

|  |  |  |  | Weighted |
|  | Number of |  |  | average |
|  | Restricted |  |  | grant date |
|  | Share Units |  |  | fair value |
|  | US$ |  |  | US$ |
Balance at January 1, 2014 |  |  | - |  |  |  |
Granted |  |  | 74,000 |  |  |  | 46.07 |
Balance at December 31, 2014 |  |  | 74,000 |  |  |  |  |
Granted |  |  | 8,000 |  |  |  | 29.09 |
Vested |  |  | (4,000 | ) |  |  | 46.07 |
Balance at December 31, 2015 |  |  | 78,000 |  |  |  |  |

The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015 is US$ 2,604 thousand and US$ 2,363 thousand, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs vested as of December 31, 2015 is US$ 117 thousand.

F - 31

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity (cont'd) |  |  |  |

Share based compensation (cont'd)
H. During 2013, 2014 and 2015, the Company recorded share-based compensation expenses. The following summarizes the allocation of the stock-based compensation expenses:

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |  |  | US$ thousands |  |  | US$ thousands |
Cost of sales |  |  | 103 |  |  |  | 124 |  |  |  | 150 |
Research and development costs |  |  | 193 |  |  |  | 340 |  |  |  | 455 |
Selling and marketing expenses |  |  | 177 |  |  |  | 366 |  |  |  | 502 |
General and administrative expenses |  |  | 195 |  |  |  | 436 |  |  |  | 806 |
|  |  | 668 |  |  |  | 1,266 |  |  |  | 1,913 |

As of December 31, 2015, there were US$ 1,553 thousand of unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock options and RSUs to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.34 years.

F - 32

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12 - Geographic areas and major customers |  |  |

| A. | Information on sales by geographic distribution:

The Company has one operating segment.
Sales are attributed to geographic distribution based on the location of the customer.

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
North America |  |  | 55,655 |  |  |  | 53,712 |  |  |  | 54,537 |
Europe |  |  | 9,257 |  |  |  | 11,421 |  |  |  | 16,331 |
Asia-Pacific |  |  | 8,386 |  |  |  | 10,489 |  |  |  | 11,870 |
|  |  | 73,298 |  |  |  | 75,622 |  |  |  | 82,738 |

| B. | Sales to single customers exceeding 10% of sales (US$ thousands):

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Customer “A” |  |  | 24,512 |  |  |  | 18,083 |  |  |  | 16,320 |

F - 33

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12 - Geographic areas and major customers (cont'd) |  |  |

C. Information on Long lived assets by geographic areas:
The following table presents the locations of the Company’s long lived assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2015:

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
North America |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 22 |
Europe |  |  | 14,230 |  |  |  | 13,588 |
Israel |  |  | 2,424 |  |  |  | 20,894 |
Other |  |  | 112 |  |  |  | 46 |
|  |  | 16,771 |  |  |  | 34,550 |

Note 13 - Financial Income (Expenses), Net

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Interest income |  |  | 1,290 |  |  |  | 1,266 |  |  |  | 1,026 |
Discount on marketable securities, net |  |  | (643 | ) |  |  | (758 | ) |  |  | (561 | )
Exchange rate differences, net |  |  | (89 | ) |  |  | (95 | ) |  |  | (148 | )
Bank charges |  |  | (154 | ) |  |  | (150 | ) |  |  | (97 | )
|  |  | 404 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 220 |

F - 34

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income

| A. | Measurement of results for tax purposes under the Israeli Income Tax Regulations (Rules for Maintaining Accounting Records of Foreign Invested Companies and Certain Partnerships and Determining Their Taxable Income) - 1986

As a "foreign invested company" (as defined in the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments-1959), the Company's taxable income or loss is calculated in US Dollars.

| B. | Corporate tax rate in Israel

Taxable income of Israeli companies is subject to tax at the rate of 25% in 2013, and 26.5% in 2014 and 2015.
In January 2016, the regular tax rate in Israel was reduced to 25% as from 2016 and thereafter.

| C. | Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter - the “Law”)

| 1. | On December 29, 2010 the Knesset approved the Economic Policy Law for 2011-2012, which includes an amendment to the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments – 1959 (hereinafter – “the Amendment to the Law”). The Amendment to the Law is effective from January 1, 2011 and its provisions will apply to preferred income derived or accrued in 2011 and thereafter by a Preferred Company, per the definition of these terms in the Amendment to the Law.

Companies can choose to not be included in the scope of the Amendment to the Law and to stay in the scope of the law before its amendment until the end of the benefits period.
Under the Amendment to the Law, which the Company started applying in 2014, upon an irrevocable election made by a company, a uniform corporate tax rate will apply to all preferred income of such company. Under the law, when the election is made, the uniform tax rate (for 2014 and on) will be 9% in areas in Israel designated as Development Zone A and 16% elsewhere in Israel. The profits of these Preferred Companies will be freely distributable as dividends, subject to a withholding tax of 20%.
Should the Company derive income from sources other than the “Preferred Enterprise” during the relevant period of benefits, such income will be taxable at the regular corporate tax rates for the applicable year.
F - 35

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income (cont’d)

| C. | Tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (hereinafter - the “Law”) (cont'd)

| 2. | Through the end of 2013 tax year, the Company has elected to be taxed under the alternative benefits method, whereby the Company waives grants in return for tax exemptions. For the manufacturing plant in Yokneam the Company was entitled to an exemption from tax on its taxable income for a period of ten years beginning from the year of election; For the research and development center the Company was entitled to an exemption from tax on its taxable income for two years beginning from the year of election, and not more than 25%, on its taxable income in the next eight years.

| 3. | In the event of distribution by the Company of cash dividends out of its retained earnings that were generated prior to 2014 tax year and were tax exempt due to the “Approved Enterprise” or "Benefited Enterprise" status, the Company would be subjected to a maximum of 25% corporate tax on the amount distributed, and a further 15% withholding tax would be deducted from the amounts distributed to the shareholders.

Out of the Company’s retained earnings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, approximately US$ 44,742 thousand and US$ 44,892 thousand respectively are tax-exempt, due to “Approved Enterprise” and "Benefited Enterprise" status. If such tax-exempt income is distributed by cash dividend (including a liquidation dividend), it would be taxed at the reduced corporate tax rate applicable to such profits (up to 25%) and an income tax liability of up to approximately US$ 11,186 thousand and US$ 11,223 thousand would be incurred as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company anticipates that any future dividends distributed pursuant to its dividend policy, will be distributed from income sources which will not impose additional tax liabilities on the Company. The Company intends to reinvest the amount of its tax-exempt income. Accordingly, no deferred income taxes have been provided on income attributable to the Company’s “Approved Enterprise" or "Benefited Enterprise". If the Company was to declare a dividend from its tax-exempt income, an income tax expense would be recognized in the period a dividend is declared.
F - 36

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income (cont’d)
D. Taxation of the subsidiaries

| 1. | The subsidiary Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc. files tax returns to US federal tax authorities and to state tax authorities in the states of New Jersey, California and Virginia.

| 2. | The subsidiary Fiberblaze is taxed according to the tax laws in Denmark and its subsidiary files tax returns to US federal tax authorities, New York state tax authorities and to the city of New York tax authorities.

| 3. | The Company has not provided for Israeli income and foreign withholding taxes on US$ 1,846 thousands of its non-Israeli subsidiaries' undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2015. The earnings could become subject to tax if earnings are remitted or deemed remitted as dividends or upon sale of a subsidiary.

The Company currently has no plans to repatriate those funds and intends to indefinitely reinvest them in its non-Israeli operations. The unrecognized deferred tax liability associated with these temporary differences was approximately US$ 231 thousands at December 31, 2015.
E. Tax assessments
For the Israeli jurisdiction the Company has final tax assessments for all years up to and including the tax year ended December 31, 2012. In December 2014 the Company has filed a request to reopen the tax assessments for 2009 through 2012, in order to obtain tax benefits that the Company believes it is entitled to. As of December 31, 2015, the Company's request has not been accepted by the Israeli tax authority.
For the US Federal jurisdictions, Silicom Inc. has final tax assessments for all years up to and including the tax year ended December 31, 2011. For the New-Jersey state jurisdiction, Silicom Inc. has final tax assessments for all years up to and including the tax year ended December 31, 2010. For the California state jurisdiction, Silicom Inc. has open tax assessments for 2011 through 2015. For the Virginia state jurisdiction, Silicom Inc. has open tax assessments for 2015.
For the Danish jurisdiction, Fiberblaze A/S has final tax assessments for all years up to and including the tax year ended August 31, 2012.
For the US Federal jurisdiction, New York State and New York City jurisdictions, Fiberblaze US LLC has open tax assessments for tax years ended August 31, 2012, August 31, 2013, August 31, 2014, for the four months ended December 31, 2014, and for the tax year ended December 31, 2015.
F - 37

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

| F. | Income before income taxes and income taxes expense (benefit) included in the consolidated statements of operations

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Income (loss) before income taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Israel |  |  | 16,857 |  |  |  | 16,522 |  |  |  | 19,486 |
Foreign jurisdiction |  |  | 1,125 |  |  |  | 787 |  |  |  | (1,061 | )
|  |  | 17,982 |  |  |  | 17,309 |  |  |  | 18,425 |
Current taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Israel |  |  | 949 |  |  |  | 2,494 |  |  |  | 2,383 |
Foreign jurisdiction |  |  | 479 |  |  |  | 409 |  |  |  | 465 |
|  |  | 1,428 |  |  |  | 2,903 |  |  |  | 2,848 |
Current tax (benefits) expenses relating |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
to prior years: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Israel |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | - |
Foreign jurisdiction |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (36 | )
|  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | (36 | )
Deferred taxes: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Israel |  |  | (552 | ) |  |  | (200 | ) |  |  | (437 | )
Foreign jurisdiction |  |  | - |  |  |  | (19 | ) |  |  | (470 | )
|  |  | (552 | ) |  |  | (219 | ) |  |  | (907 | )
Income tax expense |  |  | 905 |  |  |  | 2,704 |  |  |  | 1,905 |

F - 38

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income (cont’d)

| G. | Deferred income taxes

The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:

|  | December 31 |  |  | December 31 |
|  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |  |  | US$ thousands |
Deferred tax assets: |  |  |  |  |  |
Accrued employee benefits |  |  | 248 |  |  |  | 247 |
Research and development costs |  |  | 636 |  |  |  | 679 |
Tax loss carryforwards |  |  | - |  |  |  | 177 |
PPE |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 16 |
Inventory |  |  | - |  |  |  | 160 |
Share based compensation |  |  | - |  |  |  | 245 |
Other |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 21 |
Total gross deferred tax assets |  |  | 913 |  |  |  | 1,545 |
Deferred tax liabilities: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Inventory |  |  | (99 | ) |  |  | - |
Intangible assets |  |  | (444 | ) |  |  | (243 | )
Goodwill |  |  | - |  |  |  | (61 | )
Other |  |  | - |  |  |  | 36 |
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |  |  | (543 | ) |  |  | (268 | )
Net deferred tax assets |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 1,277 |
In Israel |  |  | 913 |  |  |  | 1,348 |
Foreign jurisdictions |  |  | (543 | ) |  |  | (71 | )
Net deferred tax assets |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 1,277 |
Current deferred tax assets |  |  | 567 |  |  |  | 950 |
Current deferred tax liabilities |  |  | (259 | ) |  |  | (111 | )
Non-current deferred tax assets |  |  | 346 |  |  |  | 595 |
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |  |  | (284 | ) |  |  | (157 | )
Net deferred tax assets |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 1,277 |

F - 39

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14 - Taxes on Income (cont'd)

| H. | Reconciliation of the statutory tax expense to actual tax expense

|  | Year ended December 31 |
|  | 2013 |  |  | 2014 |  |  | 2015 |
|  | US$ thousands |
Income before income taxes |  |  | 17,982 |  |  |  | 17,309 |  |  |  | 18,425 |
Statutory tax rate in Israel |  |  | 25.0 | % |  |  | 26.5 | % |  |  | 26.5 | %
|  |  | 4,496 |  |  |  | 4,587 |  |  |  | 4,883 |
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Non-deductible operating expenses, net |  |  | 205 |  |  |  | 476 |  |  |  | 209 |
Non-taxable income |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (819 | )
Prior year adjustments |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | (36 | )
Tax effect due to "Approved/Benefited/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferred Enterprise" status |  |  | (4,396 | ) |  |  | (2,588 | ) |  |  | (2,368 | )
Taxes related to foreign jurisdictions |  |  | 198 |  |  |  | 181 |  |  |  | 250 |
Changes in tax rate |  |  | 399 |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | 35 |
Creation of deferred taxes for tax losses and |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
benefits from previous years for which deferred |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
taxes were not created in the past |  |  | - |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | (252 | )
Other |  |  | (26 | ) |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 3 |
Income tax expense |  |  | 905 |  |  |  | 2,704 |  |  |  | 1,905 |

| I. | Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes

ASC 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. This standard prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also requires significant judgment in determining what constitutes an individual tax position as well as assessing the outcome of each tax position.
During 2013, 2014 and 2015 the Company and its subsidiaries did not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits and thus, no related interest and penalties were accrued.
In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries do not expect that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next twelve months.
F - 40

Silicom Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 15 - Subsequent Events
On March 21, 2016 Silicom's Board of Directors declared a dividend of US $1.00 per share payable on April 14, 2016 to shareholders of record as of April 4, 2016, and in the aggregate amount of approximately US $7.3 million for 2015.
In March 2016, the Company’s compensation committee and board of directors, respectively, have approved the grant of a total of 97,078 options under the Global Share Incentive Plan (2013), of which options granted to directors and office holders are subject to the approval of the Annual General Meeting, which is currently scheduled to convene no later than June 2016, as prescribed under the Israeli Companies Law, 1999 and the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Association.
F - 41