During the six-month period ended June 28, 2020, there were no changes in the Company's significant accounting policies from its disclosures in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2019, except for the new accounting standards adopted during the six months ended June 28, 2020. For a discussion of the significant accounting policies, please see the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 13, 2020. For a discussion of the new accounting standards adopted during the first six months of 2020, see “New Accounting Pronouncements” below.

The Company applies Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to recognize revenue. The guidance states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

Under the new standard revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those products or services.

•

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;

•

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract;

•

Determination of the transaction price;

•

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and

•

Recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

As part of its assessment of each contract, the Company evaluates certain factors including the customer’s ability to pay, or credit risk. For each contract, the Company considers the promise to transfer products, each of which is distinct, to be the identified performance obligations. In determining the transaction price, the price stated on the purchase order is typically fixed and represents the net consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled, and therefore there is no variable consideration. As the Company’s standard payment terms are less than one year, the Company has elected, as a practical expedient, to not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component. The Company allocates the transaction price to each distinct product based on its relative stand-alone selling price. The product price as specified on the purchase order is considered the stand-alone selling price as it is an observable source that depicts the price as if sold to a similar customer in similar circumstances.

The Company applies Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and related ASUs, which provide supplementary guidance and clarifications to account operating and finance leases. Under Topic 842, all significant lease arrangements are generally recognized at lease commencement. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date. A ROU asset and corresponding lease liability is not recorded for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less (short term leases) and the Company recognizes lease expense for these leases as incurred over the lease term.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset during the reasonably certain lease terms and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company primarily uses its incremental borrowing rate, based on the information available at commencement date, in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments related to initial direct cost and prepayments and excludes lease incentives. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. As of June 28, 2020, the Company’s right-of-use assets was approximately $2.2 million and lease liability was approximately $2.2 million as presented on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 8 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for more details.

The Company recognizes assets acquired (including goodwill and identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities assumed at fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of such assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized in earnings, after the expiration of the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related expenses and acquisition-related restructuring costs are recognized in earnings in the period in which they are incurred

Goodwill represents the excess fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are annually tested for impairment and more often if there is an indicator of impairment. Company recognized goodwill of $185,000 due to tax benefits that arose from intangible assets acquired in the SensiML acquisition.

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the

Company's ability to recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to estimate future cash flows and the fair value of long-lived assets. No impairment has been recognized to-date.

Cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash includes an amount of $100,000 pledged as cash security related to the use of credit cards as of June 28, 2020 and December 29, 2019.

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU, No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This new standard modifies certain disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The Company adopted this standard prospectively effective December 30, 2019 with no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementations Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. Under the new standard, implementations costs related to a cloud computing arrangement will be deferred or expensed as incurred, in accordance with the existing internal-use software guidance for similar costs. The new standard also prescribes the balance sheet, income statement and cash flow classification of the capitalized implementation costs and related amortizations expenses. The effective date for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the effective date is fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company adopted this standard prospectively effective December 30, 2019 with no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (“ASU 2016-13”) Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires the measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at amortized cost. ASU 2016-13 replaces the existing incurred loss impairment model with an expected loss model which requires the use of forward-looking information to calculate credit loss estimates. It also eliminates the concept of other-than-temporary impairment and requires credit losses related to certain available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. These changes result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 using the modified retrospective approach on December 30, 2019 with no impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles of ASC 740, in order to reduce the cost and complexity of its application. These changes include elimination to the exceptions for (1) Intra-period tax allocation, (2) Deferred tax liabilities related to outside basis differences, and (3) Year-to-date losses in interim periods. This standard is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.