XML 41 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
v3.25.3

N-2 - $ / shares | 12 Months Ended |  |  |  |  |
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
Sep. 30, 2025 | Sep. 30, 2024 | Sep. 30, 2023 | Sep. 30, 2022 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020
Cover [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001490349 |  |  |  |  |
Amendment Flag | false |  |  |  |  |
Securities Act File Number | 1-35040 |  |  |  |  |
Document Type | 10-K |  |  |  |  |
Entity Registrant Name | PHENIXFIN CORPORATION |  |  |  |  |
Entity Address, Address Line One | 445 Park Avenue |  |  |  |  |
Entity Address, Address Line Two | 10th Floor |  |  |  |  |
Entity Address, City or Town | New York |  |  |  |  |
Entity Address, State or Province | NY |  |  |  |  |
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code | 10022 |  |  |  |  |
City Area Code | (212) |  |  |  |  |
Local Phone Number | 859-0390 |  |  |  |  |
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | No |  |  |  |  |
Entity Emerging Growth Company | false |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk Factors [Table Text Block] | Item 1A. Risk Factors Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware of various risks, including those described below. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K, before you decide whether to make an investment in our securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. The risks described below, as well as additional risks and uncertainties presently unknown by us or currently not deemed significant could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In such case, our NAV and the trading price of our common stock or other securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. RISK RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE Certain Risks in the Current Environment We are currently operating in a period of capital markets disruptions and economic uncertainty. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect the yields, and increase the risks of, our investments in portfolio companies, and make it more difficult for us to raise equity capital should we choose to do so. From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. The U.S. economy, as well as other major economies, may experience a recession, and we anticipate our businesses would be materially and adversely affected by a prolonged recession in the United States and other major markets. Disruptions in the capital markets have increased the spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. Any recession or future significant market events or disruptions (e.g. pandemics, war, natural disasters or terrorist activities) could have an adverse impact on the ability of lenders to originate loans, the volume and type of loans originated, the ability of borrowers to make payments and the volume and type of amendments and waivers granted to borrowers and remedial actions taken in the event of a borrower default, each of which could negatively impact the amount and quality of loans available for investment by the Company and returns to the Company, among other things. Recession, pandemics and other future market disruptions and/or illiquidity could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and have a material negative impact on our operating results and the fair values of our debt and equity investments. We may have to access, if available, alternative markets for debt and equity capital, and a severe disruption in the global financial markets, deterioration in credit and financing conditions or uncertainty regarding U.S. government spending and deficit levels or other global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, between 2008 and 2009, the U.S. and global capital markets were unstable as evidenced by periodic disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. Despite actions of the U.S. federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. Equity capital may be difficult to raise during periods of adverse or volatile market conditions because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than NAV without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. Volatility and dislocation in the capital markets can also create a challenging environment in which to raise or access debt capital. The current market and future market conditions similar to those experienced from 2008 through 2009 for any substantial length of time could make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience, including being at a higher cost in a rising interest rate environment. If any of these conditions appear, they may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to increase returns to equity holders through the effective use of leverage, and negatively impact our operating results. In addition, significant changes or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). Significant changes in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell our investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Governmental authorities worldwide have taken increased measures to stabilize the markets and support economic growth. The success of these measures is unknown and they may not be sufficient to address the market dislocations or avert severe and prolonged reductions in economic activity. Events outside of our control, including terrorist attacks, acts of war, natural disasters, significant tariffs or public health crises, could negatively affect the portfolio companies in which we invest and make the valuation of those investments more uncertain. Periods of market volatility have occurred and could continue to occur in response to pandemics or other events outside of our control, including terrorist attacks, acts of war, natural disasters, significant tariffs, public health crises or similar events. These types of events have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect operating results for us and for our portfolio companies. The large-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 resulted in sanctions and market disruptions, including declines in regional and global stock markets, unusual volatility in global commodity markets and significant devaluations of Russian currency. The extent and duration of the military action are impossible to predict but could be significant. Market disruption caused by the Russian military action, and any counter measures or responses thereto (including international sanctions, a downgrade in a country’s credit rating, purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts, tariffs, changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, cyberattacks and espionage) could continue to have severe adverse impacts on regional and/or global securities and commodities markets, including markets for oil and natural gas. These impacts may include reduced market liquidity, distress in credit markets, further disruption of global supply chains, increased risk of inflation, and limited access to investments in certain international markets and/or issuers. In addition, the conflicts in the Middle East and terrorist acts may cause significant volatility in the markets and/or market disruptions. The extent and duration of these military actions, conflicts and resulting market disruptions are impossible to predict, but have been and could continue to be substantial, and any such market disruptions could affect our portfolio companies’ operations. As a result, our portfolio investments could decline in value or our valuation of them could become uncertain. We have evaluated subsequent events from September 30, 2025 through the filing date of this annual report on Form 10-K. However, as the discussion in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the Company’s financial statements for the annual period ended September 30, 2025, the analysis contained herein may not fully account for market event impacts. As of September 30, 2025, the Company valued its portfolio investments in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) based on the facts and circumstances known by the Company at that time, or reasonably expected to be known at that time. Due to the overall volatility that market events may have caused during the months following our most recent valuation (as of September 30, 2025), any valuations conducted now or in the future in conformity with U.S. GAAP could result in a lower fair value of our portfolio. Trade negotiations and related government actions may create regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and our investment strategies and adversely affect the profitability of portfolio companies. Recently, the U.S. government has indicated its intent to alter its approach to international trade policy and in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements and treaties with foreign countries, and has made proposals and taken actions related thereto, and has proposed and/or taken actions to increase tariffs or other duties on goods or products being imported into the U.S. For example, the U.S. government has imposed, and may in the future increase, tariffs on certain foreign goods, including from China, such as steel and aluminum. Some foreign governments, including China, have instituted retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods. Recently, the current U.S. presidential administration has proposed and/or imposed significant increases to tariffs on goods imported into the U.S., including from China, Canada, and Mexico. We cannot predict how or what tariffs will be imposed or what retaliatory measures other countries, including China, may take in response to tariffs proposed or imposed by the U.S. Such uncertainty and/or tariffs or counter-measures could further increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of portfolio companies whose businesses rely on imported goods. There is uncertainty as to further actions that may be taken under the current U.S. presidential administration with respect to U.S. trade policy, including with respect to the proposed tariffs. Further governmental actions related to the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers, or changes to international trade agreements or policies, could create further regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and adversely affect their businesses and financial condition, particularly to the extent the revenues and profitability of their businesses rely on goods imported from outside of the United States. Government Policies, Changes in Laws, and International Trade. Governmental regulatory activity, especially that of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, may have a significant effect on interest rates and on the economy generally, which in turn may affect the price of the securities in which the Company plans to invest. High interest rates, the imposition of credit controls or other restraints on the financing of takeovers or other acquisitions could diminish the number of merger tender offers, exchange offers or other acquisitions, and as a consequence have a materially adverse effect on the activities of the Company Moreover, changes in U.S. federal, state, and local tax laws, U.S. federal or state securities and bankruptcy laws or in accounting standards may make corporate acquisitions or restructurings less desirable or make risk arbitrage less profitable. Amendments to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or other relevant laws could also alter an expected outcome or introduce greater uncertainty regarding the likely outcome of an investment situation. In addition, governmental policies could create uncertainty for the global financial system and such uncertainty may increase the risks inherent to the Company and its activities. For example, tariffs and restrictions, as well as other changes in U.S. trade policy, have resulted in, and may continue to trigger, retaliatory actions by affected countries, including imposing trade sanctions on certain U.S. products. A “trade war” of this nature has the potential to increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of companies whose businesses rely on imports and exports. Prospective investors should realize that any significant changes in governmental policies (including tariffs and other policies involving international trade) could have a material adverse impact on the Company and its investments. Rising interest rates may increase our borrowing costs and reduce the net return that we are able to achieve on debt investments in portfolio companies, and may also increase the risk of default on our portfolio company loans. In 2023, the Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates. Additional interest rate increases may come. Changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from our performance to the extent we are exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility. In periods of rising interest rates, such as the current interest rate environment, to the extent we borrow money subject to a floating interest rate, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income. Further, rising interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if such increases cause our borrowing costs to rise at a rate in excess of the rate that our investments yield. Further, rising interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if we hold investments with floating interest rates, subject to specified minimum interest rates (such as a SOFR floor), while at the same time engaging in borrowings subject to floating interest rates not subject to such minimums. In such a scenario, rising interest rates may increase our interest expense, even though our interest income from investments is not increasing in a corresponding manner as a result of such minimum interest rates. If general interest rates rise, there is a risk that the portfolio companies in which we hold floating rate securities will be unable to pay escalating interest amounts, which could result in a default under their loan documents with us. Rising interest rates could also cause portfolio companies to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. In addition, rising interest rates may increase pressure on us to provide fixed rate loans to our portfolio companies, which could adversely affect our net investment income, as increases in our cost of borrowed funds would not be accompanied by increased interest income from such fixed-rate investments. Further downgrades of the U.S. credit rating, automatic spending cuts, or another government shutdown could negatively impact our cost of borrowing and the net return on our investments. U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of additional credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns, or a recession in the United States. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling on multiple occasions, ratings agencies have lowered or threatened to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or its perceived creditworthiness could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. Absent further quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, these developments could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. If our borrowing costs were to rise on account of these factors, and we were unable to raise the rates of return on our portfolio company debt, our net return on investments would decline. Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies, increase our funding costs and limit our access to capital. Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. In the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major domestic and international financial institutions. In particular, in past periods of instability, the financial services sector was negatively impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing their capital positions and abilities to lend and invest. In addition, continued uncertainty between the United States and other countries, including China and Russia, with respect to trade policies, treaties, and tariffs, among other factors, have caused disruption in the global markets. There can be no assurance that market conditions will not worsen in the future. In an economic downturn, we may have non-performing assets or non-performing assets may increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of any collateral securing our loans. A severe recession may further decrease the value of such collateral and result in losses of value in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, assets and net worth. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us on terms we deem acceptable. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results. The occurrence of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any such unfavorable economic conditions, including rising interest rates, may also increase our funding costs, limit our access to capital markets or negatively impact our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets. In addition, any future financial market uncertainty could lead to financial market disruptions and could further impact our ability to obtain financing. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. Risks Related to Our Business As a result of our internalized operating structure, including our internalized management and investment functions, we may incur significant costs and face significant risks associated with being self-managed, including adverse effects on our business and financial condition. Effective January 1, 2021, we operate under an internalized operating structure, including our management and investment functions. There can be no assurances that our internalized operating structure will be beneficial to us and our stockholders, as we may not be able to effectively replicate the services previously provided to us by our former investment adviser and administrator. While we no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we previously paid under the investment management and administration agreements with our previous adviser and administrator, we have other significant direct expenses. These include general and administrative costs, legal, accounting and other governance expenses and costs and expenses related to managing our portfolio. We also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants. In addition, we may be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to pay distributions. As an internally managed BDC, we are dependent upon our management team and other professionals, and if we are not able to hire and retain qualified personnel, we will not realize the benefits of an internally managed BDC. Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders depends upon the performance of our management team and professionals. We may experience difficulty identifying, engaging and retaining management, investment and general and administrative personnel with the necessary expertise and credit-related investment experience. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to offer more competitive and flexible compensation structures, such as offering both a profit-sharing plan and an equity incentive plan, is subject to the limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, which could limit our ability to attract and retain talented investment management professionals. If we are unable to attract and retain highly talented professionals for the internal management of our Company, we will not realize the benefits of an internally managed BDC, and the results of our operation could deteriorate. We may suffer credit and capital losses. Making private debt and private equity investments is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk of credit and capital loss, and therefore an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with a low tolerance for risk. These risks are likely to increase during an economic recession, such as the economic recession or downturn that the United States and many other countries have recently experienced or are experiencing. Because we use borrowed funds to make investments or fund our business operations, we are exposed to risks typically associated with leverage which increase the risk of investing in us. We have borrowed funds, including through the issuance of $57.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.25% unsecured notes due November 1, 2028 (the “Notes” or the “2028 Notes”) to leverage our capital structure, which is generally considered a speculative investment technique. In addition, on December 15, 2022, the Company entered into a 3-year $50.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Woodforest Bank, N.A. (“Woodforest”), Valley National Bank, and Axiom Bank, (collectively, the “Lenders”), which was amended on February 21, 2024 to increase the principal amount of loan available under the Credit Facility by $12.5 million to $62.5 million. On August 5, 2024 (the “Second Amendment Effective Date”), in order to increase the size of the Credit Facility, the parties to the Credit Facility amended the Credit Facility, effective as of the Second Amendment Effective Date (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment increased the principal amount of loan available under the Credit Facility by $25 million to $87.5 million. On April 17, 2025 (the “Third Amendment Effective Date”), in order to extend the term and increase the size of the Credit Facility, the parties to the Credit Facility amended the terms of the Credit Facility, effective as of the Third Amendment Effective Date (the “Third Amendment”). The Third Amendment increased the principal amount of the loan available under the Credit Facility by $12.5 million to $100.0 million (with potential access to up to an additional $50.0 million pursuant to an uncommitted accordion provision) and appointed BankUnited, N.A. to assume all agency and syndication responsibilities from the prior agent and lenders. The Amendment also extended the term of the credit facility to April 17, 2030, five years from the Third Amendment Effective Date. Other material terms remain substantially unchanged. As a result:
| ● | our common stock may be exposed to an increased risk of loss because a decrease in the value of our investments may have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did not use leverage;
| ● | if we do not appropriately match the assets and liabilities of our business, adverse changes in interest rates could reduce or eliminate the incremental income we make with the proceeds of any leverage;
| ● | our ability to pay distributions on our common stock may be restricted if our asset coverage ratio with respect to each of our outstanding senior securities representing indebtedness and our outstanding preferred shares, as defined by the 1940 Act, is not at least 200% and any amounts used to service indebtedness or preferred stock would not be available for such distributions;
| ● | any credit facility to which we became a party may be subject to periodic renewal by our lenders, whose continued participation cannot be guaranteed;
| ● | any credit facility to which we became a party may contain covenants restricting our operating flexibility;
| ● | we, and indirectly our stockholders, bear the cost of issuing and paying interest or dividends on such securities; and
| ● | any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common shares.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks and other financial institutions, which we collectively refer to as “senior securities”, only in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio equals at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) after each issuance of senior securities. For a discussion of the terms of the Notes, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources.” As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company under the 1940 Act. The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business. We anticipate that our investments generally will be made in private companies. Substantially all of these securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will be otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company. A substantial portion of our portfolio investments will be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our valuation designee under the oversight of our board of directors and, as a result, there may be uncertainty regarding the value of our portfolio investments. The debt and equity securities in which we invest for which market quotations are not readily available will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s valuation designee, under the oversight of our board of directors. Most of our investments (other than cash and cash equivalents) will be classified as Level 3 under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This means that our portfolio valuations will be based on unobservable inputs and our own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability in question. We expect that inputs into the determination of fair value of our portfolio investments will require significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable market data are available, such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes, which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimers materially reduces the reliability of such information. We have retained the services of independent valuation firms to review the valuation of various loans and securities. The types of factors that we may take into account in determining the fair value of our investments generally include, as appropriate, comparison to publicly traded securities including such factors as yield, maturity and measures of credit quality, the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these loans and securities existed. Our NAV could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such loans and securities. We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer. We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. We also have not adopted any policy restricting the percentage of our assets that may be invested in a single portfolio company. To the extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, our NAV may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the market’s assessment of the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified investment company. Beyond our income tax diversification requirements under Subchapter M of the Code, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. (Note our significant investments in our affiliates FlexFIN and NSG – see Risks Related to our Investments). We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments, the value of our common stock and our rate of return on invested capital. A reduction in the interest rates on new investments relative to interest rates on current investments could also have an adverse impact on our net interest income. Further increases in interest rates could decrease the value of any investments we hold which earn fixed interest rates and also could increase our interest expense, thereby decreasing our net income. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate, which could reduce the value of our common stock. Loans under our Credit Facility and the financial credit we extend to our portfolio companies bear interest based on SOFR, but experience with SOFR based loans is limited. Loans under our current Credit Facility bear interest at a rate based upon the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Also, the secured terms loans that we make to our portfolio companies and the secured notes of our portfolio companies in which we invest bear interest at SOFR based rates. SOFR is considered to be a risk-free rate, and USD LIBOR was a risk weighted rate. Thus, SOFR tends to be a lower rate than USD LIBOR, because SOFR does not contain a risk component. This difference may negatively impact our net interest margin of our investments. Also, the use of SOFR based rates is relatively new, and experience with SOFR based rate loans is limited. There could be unanticipated difficulties or disruptions with the calculation and publication of SOFR based rates. This could result in increased borrowing costs for the Company or could adversely impact the interest income we receive from our portfolio companies or the market value of the financial obligations that are due to us from our portfolio companies. Because we use debt to finance various investments, changes in interest rates will affect our cost of capital and net investment income. Because we borrow money to make certain investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income in the event we use our existing debt to finance our investments. In periods of rising interest rates, such as the current period we are in, our cost of funds will increase to the extent we access any credit facility with a floating interest rate, which could reduce our net investment income to the extent any debt investments have fixed interest rates. We expect that our long-term fixed-rate investments will be financed primarily with issuances of equity and long-term debt securities. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. You should also be aware that, to the extent we make floating debt investments, a rise in the general level of interest rates typically leads to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. If our investments are not managed effectively, we may be unable to achieve our investment objective. Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to manage our business, which will depend on the internalized management team. Accomplishing this result is largely a function of the internalized management team’s ability to provide quality and efficient services to us. They may also be required to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow our rate of investment. Any failure to manage our business effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may experience fluctuations in our periodic operating results. We could experience fluctuations in our periodic operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the performance of our portfolio companies, the level of our expenses (including the interest rates payable on our borrowings), the dividend rates payable on preferred stock we issue, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods. Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC could reduce our operating flexibility. If we fail to maintain our status as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more onerous regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility. We may have difficulty paying required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, such as PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discount, which could be significant relative to our overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as a result of PIK arrangements are included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash. Since in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to raise cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify and maintain our tax treatment as a RIC and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax. See “Taxation as a RIC” and “Failure to Qualify as a RIC”. We may not be able to pay distributions to our shareholders. We cannot assure that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to pay cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by, among other things, the impact of one or more of the risk factors described herein. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC could limit our ability to pay distributions. As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to us under the 1940 Act. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC tax treatment, compliance with applicable BDC regulations, and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our stockholders in the future. The highly competitive market in which we operate may limit our investment opportunities. A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make. We compete with other BDCs and investment funds (including public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, SBICs and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds). Additionally, because competition for investment opportunities generally has increased among alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have begun to invest in areas in which they have not traditionally invested. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities has intensified in recent years and may intensify further in the future. Some of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions and valuation requirements that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC and the tax consequences of qualifying as a RIC. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this existing and potentially increasing competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective. We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. A significant part of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market for investments in mid-sized companies is underserved by traditional commercial banks and other financial institutions. A significant increase in the number and/or size of our competitors in this target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, several of our competitors have greater experience operating under the regulatory restrictions of the 1940 Act and under an internalized management structure. In the event we make distributions, we would need additional capital to finance our growth and such capital may not be available on favorable terms or at all. We have elected and intend to qualify annually to be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we must meet certain requirements, including source-of-income, asset diversification and distribution requirements in order to not have to pay corporate-level U.S. on income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, which allows us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level U.S. federal income tax liability. As a BDC, we are generally required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities, which includes all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) at the time we issue any debt or preferred stock. This requirement limits the amount of our leverage. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt or issuing preferred stock and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. We cannot assure you that debt and equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, and debt financings may be restricted by the terms of any of our outstanding borrowings. In addition, as a BDC, we are generally not permitted to issue common stock priced below NAV without stockholder approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease new lending and investment activities, and our NAV could decline. Our board of directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval. Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive certain of our operating policies and strategies (including our investment objective) without prior notice and without stockholder approval. However, absent stockholder approval, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, operating results or value of our stock. Nevertheless, the effects could adversely affect our business and impact our ability to make distributions and cause you to lose all or part of your investment. Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for loss on invested equity capital. If we use leverage to partially finance our investments, which we have done historically, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. We issued the Notes, entered into the Credit Facility, and may issue other debt securities or enter into other types of borrowing arrangements in the future. If the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause our NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock distributions or scheduled debt payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and we only intend to use leverage if expected returns will exceed the cost of borrowing. As of September 30, 2025, there was $149.2 million of outstanding borrowings. The weighted average interest rate charged on our borrowings as of September 30, 2025 was 6.5% (exclusive of debt issuance costs). We will need to generate sufficient cash flow to make these required interest payments. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the Notes, the holders thereof will have the right to declare the principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest on the outstanding Notes to be due and payable immediately. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the Credit Facility or any other credit facility we enter into, the lenders thereunder would likely have a superior claim to our assets over our stockholders. We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions. Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control and adversely affect our business. There could be:
| ● | sudden electrical or telecommunications outages;
| ● | natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes;
| ● | disease pandemics (such as the COVID-19 outbreak);
| ● | events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts; and
| ● | cyber-attacks.
These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. A failure of cybersecurity systems, as well as the occurrence of events unanticipated in our disaster recovery systems and management continuity planning could impair our ability to conduct business effectively. The occurrence of a disaster, such as a cyber-attack against us, certain portfolio companies, or against a third-party that has access to our data or networks, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of our disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error, could have an adverse effect on our ability to communicate or conduct business (including the business of certain portfolio companies), negatively impacting our operations and financial condition. This adverse effect can become particularly acute if those events affect our electronic data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or impact the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of our data. We depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures, our computer systems, networks, and data, like those of other companies, could be subject to cyber-attacks and unauthorized access, use, alteration, or destruction, such as from physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized tampering, malware and computer virus attacks, or system failures and disruptions. If one or more of these events occurs, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary, and other information processed, stored in, and transmitted through our computer systems and networks. Such an attack could cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations, which could result in financial losses, litigation, regulatory penalties, client dissatisfaction or loss, reputational damage, and increased costs associated with mitigation of damages and remediation. Third parties with which we do business and certain of our portfolio companies may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information, as well as customer, counterparty, employee and borrower information. Cybersecurity failures or breaches our service providers (including, but not limited to, accountants, custodians, transfer agents and administrators), and the issuers of securities in which we invest, also have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with our ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, the inability of our stockholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputation damages, reimbursement of other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure or destruction of data, or other cybersecurity incidents, with increased costs and other consequences, including those described above. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. Privacy and information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance with those changes, may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. We currently do not maintain insurance coverage relating to cybersecurity risks, and we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are not fully insured. Technological innovations and industry disruptions, including those related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, may negatively impact us. Technological innovations, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, have disrupted traditional approaches in multiple industries and can permit companies to achieve success and in the process disrupt markets and market practices. We can provide no assurance that new businesses and approaches will not be created that would compete with us and/or our portfolio companies or alter the market practices in which we have been designed to function within and on which we depend on for our investment return. New approaches could damage our investments, disrupt the market in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of investments. We may, subject to internal policies, use artificial intelligence or machine learning in connection with our business activities. The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning carries with it certain risks, including the risks that inputs include confidential or personally identifiable information and that outputs contain inaccuracies and errors. The applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning, including those in the investment and financial sectors, continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict all of the future risks that may arise from such developments. We cannot control the use of artificial intelligence or machine learning in our portfolio companies or third-party products or services and therefore could be exposed to associated risks if our portfolio companies, third-party service providers or any counterparties use artificial intelligence or machine learning in their business activities. Risks Related to Our Investments We may not realize gains from our equity investments. When we make a debt investment, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. Our equity investments may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline significantly in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. Our investments are very risky and highly speculative. We have invested materially in senior secured first lien term loans and senior secured second lien term loans issued by private companies. Senior Secured Loans There is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additional capital, and, in some circumstances, our lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. In addition, deterioration in a portfolio company’s financial condition and prospects, including its inability to raise additional capital, may be accompanied by deterioration in the value of the collateral for the loan. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies. Equity Investments When we invest in senior secured first lien term loans or senior secured second lien term loans, we may receive warrants or other equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. The warrants or equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our warrants or equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any warrants or equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. In addition, investing in private companies involves a number of significant risks. See “Our investments in private portfolio companies may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment” below. Our investments in private portfolio companies may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Investments in private companies involve a number of significant risks. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the ability of our investment professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments. Private companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment. In addition, they typically have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns. Additionally, private companies are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us. Private companies also generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position. In addition, our executive officers and directors may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in these types of companies. We have invested in secured debt issued by our portfolio companies. In the case of our senior secured first lien term loans, the portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with the debt securities in which we invest. With respect to our senior secured second lien term loans, the portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks above or equally with the debt securities in which we invest. In the case of debt ranking above the senior secured second lien term loans in which we invest, we would be subordinate to such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company and therefore the holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share any distributions on an equal and ratable basis with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. Additionally, certain loans that we make to portfolio companies may be secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any. The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: (1) the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; (2) the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; (3) the approval of amendments to collateral documents; (4) releases of liens on the collateral; and (5) waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected. Our portfolio companies may prepay loans, which prepayment may reduce stated yields if capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields. Our loans to portfolio companies are prepayable at any time, and most of them at no premium to par. It is uncertain as to when each loan may be prepaid. Whether a loan is prepaid will depend both on the continued positive performance of the portfolio company and the existence of favorable financing market conditions that allow such company the ability to replace existing financing with less expensive capital. As market conditions change frequently, it is unknown when, and if, this may be possible for each portfolio company. In the case of some of these loans, having the loan prepaid early may reduce the achievable yield for us below the stated yield to maturity contained herein if the capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields. Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio and our ability to make follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies may be restricted. Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, provided that there are no restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments in order to: (1) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (2) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (3) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our initial investment. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. Our failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make such follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, because we are inhibited by compliance with BDC requirements or because we might lose our RIC tax treatment. We also may be restricted from making follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies to the extent that affiliates of ours hold interests in such companies. As of September 30, 2025, 15.3% of our total assets were invested in NSG, our insurance business. This significant exposure subjects our Company to various risks associated with such business to a much greater extent than companies not similarly concentrated. As of September 30, 2025, 11.7% of our total assets were invested in FlexFIN, our affiliate’s asset-based lending business. This significant exposure subjects our Company to various risks associated with such business (which are identified below) to a much greater extent than companies not similarly concentrated. Client borrowers, particularly with respect to asset-based lending activities, may lack the operating history, cash flows or balance sheet necessary to support other financing options and may expose us to additional risk. A portion of our loan portfolio consists, through FlexFIN, of asset-based lending involving gemstones. Some of these products arise out of relationships with clients who lack the operating history, cash flows or balance sheet necessary to qualify for other financing options. This could increase our risk of loss. 11.7% of the Company’s total assets (as of September 30, 2025) are invested in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business and its activities are influenced by volatility in prices of gemstones and jewelry. Our affiliate’s asset-based lending business is impacted by volatility in gemstone and jewelry prices. Among the factors that can impact the price of gemstones and jewelry are supply and demand of gemstones; political, economic, and global financial events; movement of the U.S. dollar versus other currencies; and the activity of large speculators and other participants. A significant decline in market prices of gemstones could result in reduced collateral value and losses, (i.e., a lower balance of asset-based loans outstanding for the Company’s affiliate.) The gemstones and jewelry business is subject to the risk of fraud and counterfeiting. The gemstones business is exposed to the risk of loss as a result of fraud in its various forms. We seek to minimize our exposure to fraud through a number of means, including third-party authentication and verification and the establishment of procedures designed to detect fraud. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing or identifying fraud, or in obtaining redress in the event such fraud is detected. We may be subject to risks associated with our investments in unitranche loans Unitranche loans provide leverage levels comparable to a combination of first lien and second lien or subordinated loans, and may rank junior to other debt instruments issued by the portfolio company. Unitranche loans generally allow the borrower to make a large lump sum payment of principal at the end of the loan term, and there is a heightened risk of loss if the borrower is unable to pay the lump sum or refinance the amount owed at maturity. From the perspective of a lender, in addition to making a single loan, a unitranche loan may allow the lender to choose to participate in the “first out” tranche, which will generally receive priority with respect to payments of principal, interest and any other amounts due, or to choose to participate only in the “last out” tranche, which is generally paid only after the first out tranche is paid. We may participate in “first out” and “last out” tranches of unitranche loans and make single unitranche loans, and we may suffer losses on such loans if the borrower is unable to make required payments when due. Covenant-Lite Loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants. A significant number of high yield loans in the market may consist of covenant-lite loans, or “Covenant-Lite Loans.” A significant portion of the loans in which we may invest or get exposure to through our investments may be deemed to be Covenant-Lite Loans. Such loans do not require the borrower to maintain debt service or other financial ratios and do not include terms which allow the lender to monitor the performance of the borrower and declare a default if certain criteria are breached. Ownership of Covenant-Lite Loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants. As a BDC, our ability to invest in public companies and foreign companies is limited by the 1940 Act. To maintain our tax treatment as a BDC, we are not permitted to acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” specified in the 1940 Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets (with certain limited exceptions). Subject to certain exceptions for follow-on investments and distressed companies, an investment in an issuer that has outstanding securities listed on a national securities exchange may be treated as qualifying assets only if such issuer has a market capitalization that is less than $250 million at the time of such investment. In addition, we may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in opportunistic investments which will be intended to diversify or complement the remainder of our portfolio and to enhance our returns to stockholders. These investments may include private equity investments, securities of public companies that are broadly traded and securities of non-U.S. companies. We expect that these public companies generally will have debt securities that are non-investment grade. Our investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments. A portion of our investments may be in securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Although it is anticipated that most of our investments will be denominated in U.S. dollars, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency may change in relation to the U.S. dollar. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk or, that if we do, such strategies will be effective. As a result, a change in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our profitability. Hedging transactions may expose us to additional risks. We may engage in currency or interest rate hedging transactions. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price. While we may enter into transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek or be able to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities. We currently expect that a significant portion of our investments will involve lending directly to private companies. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations turn out to be inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us. If we invest in the securities and obligations of distressed and bankrupt issuers, we might not receive interest or other payments. We may invest in the securities and obligations of distressed and bankrupt issuers, including debt obligations that are in covenant or payment default. Such investments generally are considered speculative. The repayment of defaulted obligations is subject to significant uncertainties. Defaulted obligations might be repaid only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings, during which the issuer of those obligations might not make any interest or other payments. We may not realize gains from our equity investments. We are subject to risks associated with significant investments in one or more economic sectors and/or industries, including the business services sector, which includes our investment in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business. At times, the Company may have a significant portion of its assets invested in securities of companies conducting business within one or more economic sectors and/or industries, including the Services: Business sector, which includes our investment in an asset-based lending business and the insurance sector. Companies in the same sector or industry may be similarly affected by economic, regulatory, political or market events or conditions, which may make the Company more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in that sector or industry than companies that invest more broadly. Generally, the more broadly the Company invests, the more it spreads risk and potentially reduces the risks of loss and volatility. As of September 30, 2025, investments in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business constituted 11.7% of our total assets. See above, under Item 1A for risk factors related to our investment in that business. Risks Related to Our Operations as a BDC and a RIC Regulations governing our operation as a BDC may limit our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our business requires a substantial amount of capital to operate and grow. We may acquire additional capital from the issuance of senior securities (including debt and preferred stock), the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or from securitization transactions. However, we may not be able to raise additional capital in the future on favorable terms or at all. Additionally, we may only issue senior securities up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act permits us to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) after such issuance or incurrence. If our assets decline in value and we fail to satisfy this test, we may be required to liquidate a portion of our investments and repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales or repayment may be disadvantageous, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to us under the 1940 Act. Changes in the laws or regulations governing our business, or changes in the interpretations thereof, and any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Changes in the laws or regulations or the interpretations of the laws and regulations that govern BDCs, RICs or non-depository commercial lenders could significantly affect our operations and our cost of doing business. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations and are subject to judicial and administrative decisions that affect our operations, including our loan originations, maximum interest rates, fees and other charges, disclosures to portfolio companies, the terms of secured transactions, collection and foreclosure procedures and other trade practices. If these laws, regulations or decisions change, or if we expand our business into jurisdictions that have adopted more stringent requirements than those in which we currently conduct business, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply, or we might have to restrict our operations. In addition, if we do not comply with applicable laws, regulations and decisions, we may lose licenses needed for the conduct of our business and may be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties. As an internally managed BDC, we are subject to certain restrictions that may adversely affect our ability to offer certain compensation structures. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to offer more competitive and flexible compensation structures, such as offering both a profit-sharing plan and an equity incentive plan, is subject to the limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, which limits our ability to attract and retain talented investment management professionals. As such, these limitations could inhibit our ability to grow, pursue our business plan and attract and retain professional talent, any or all of which may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As an internally managed BDC, we are dependent upon our management team and investment professionals for their time availability and for our future success, and if we are not able to hire and retain qualified personnel, or if we lose key members of our senior management team, our ability to implement our business strategy could be significantly harmed. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders depends upon the performance of our management team and investment professionals. We depend upon the members of our management and our investment professionals for the identification, final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. These employees have critical industry experience and relationships on which we rely to implement our business plan. If we lose the services of key members of our senior management team, we may not be able to operate the business as we expect, and our ability to compete could be harmed, which could cause our operating results to suffer. We believe our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to identify, attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly skilled employees. If we do not succeed in identifying, attracting and retaining such personnel, we may not be able to operate our business as we expect. As an internally managed BDC, our compensation structure is determined and set by our Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee. This structure currently includes salary, bonus and incentive compensation. We are subject to limitations by the 1940 Act on our ability to employ an incentive compensation structure that directly ties performance of our investment portfolio and results of operations to incentive compensation. Members of our senior management team may receive offers of more flexible and attractive compensation arrangements from other companies, particularly from investment advisers to externally managed BDCs that are not subject to the same limitations on incentive-based compensation that we are subject to as an internally managed BDC. A departure by one or more members of our senior management team could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot predict how tax reform legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business. Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us, our investments, or our stockholders. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. We cannot predict with certainty how any changes in the tax laws might affect us, our stockholders, or our portfolio investments. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to us and our stockholders of such qualification, or could have other adverse consequences. Stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities. Legislation that became effective in 2018 may allow the Company to incur additional leverage, which could increase the risk of investing in the Company. The 1940 Act generally prohibits the Company from incurring indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets). However, in March 2018, the SBCA was signed into law, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs. The SBCA included changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement from 200% to 150%, if certain requirements are met. Under the 1940 Act, the Company is allowed to increase its leverage capacity if our stockholders representing at least a majority of the votes cast, when a quorum is present, approve a proposal to do so. If we receive stockholder approval, we would be allowed to increase our leverage capacity on the first day after such approval. Alternatively, the 1940 Acts allows the majority of our independent directors to approve an increase in our leverage capacity, and such approval would become effective after the one-year anniversary of such proposal. In either case, we would be required to make certain disclosures on our website and in SEC filings regarding, among other things, the receipt of approval to increase our leverage, our leverage capacity and usage, and risks related to leverage. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and increases the risk of investing in our securities. Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital. As we use leverage to partially finance our investments, our stockholders will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the NAV attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect the Company’s ability to pay common stock dividends, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. See “Regulation”. Our intent is that a substantial portion of the investments that we acquire will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could be found to be in violation of the 1940 Act provisions applicable to BDCs and possibly lose our tax treatment as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We would become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax if we are unable to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or satisfy RIC distribution requirements. We have elected, and intend to qualify annually, to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. No assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our qualification as a RIC. To maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements.
| ● | The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we timely distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next year and pay a 4% U.S. federal excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year that generated such taxable income.
| ● | The source of income requirement is satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our gross income for each taxable year from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or other securities or foreign currencies or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (as defined in the Code).
| ● | The asset diversification requirement is satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity securities of a “qualified publicly traded partnership”). In addition, no more than 25% of the value of our assets can be invested in the securities, other than U.S. Government securities or securities of other RICs, (1) of one issuer (2) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (3) of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships”.
If we fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment for any reason or are subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax, the resulting corporate-level taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. In addition, to the extent we had unrealized gains, we would have to establish deferred tax liabilities for taxes, which would reduce our NAV accordingly. In addition, our stockholders would lose the tax credit realized if we, as a RIC, decide to retain the net realized capital gain and make deemed distributions of net realized capital gains, and pay taxes on behalf of our stockholders at the end of the tax year. The loss of this pass-through tax treatment could have a material adverse effect on the total return of an investment in our common stock. Risks Relating to an Investment in Our Securities Investing in our securities may involve an above average degree of risk. The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of risk and, therefore, an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance. Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may, at times, trade at a discount to their NAV and the Company’s shares have not traded at or above NAV since the first quarter of 2015. Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may, at times, trade at a discount from NAV. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies and business development companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our NAV per share may decline. Our common stock has not traded at or above NAV since the first quarter of 2015, and we cannot predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or below NAV in the future. The market price of our common stock fluctuates. The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock fluctuates and may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:
| ● | significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of business development companies or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of the companies;
| ● | changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to BDCs or RICs;
| ● | loss of our qualification as a RIC or BDC;
| ● | changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
| ● | changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
| ● | changes in accounting guidelines governing valuation of our investments;
| ● | any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
| ● | departure of our key personnel;
| ● | operating performance of companies comparable to us;
| ● | general economic trends and other external factors; and
| ● | loss of a major funding source.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. The Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price of our common stock. The NAV per share of our common stock may be diluted if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current NAV per share of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock. While we currently do not have the requisite stockholder approval to sell shares of our common stock at a price or prices below our then current NAV per share, we may seek such approval in the future. In addition, at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we received approval from our stockholders to authorize the Company, with the approval of our board of directors, to issue securities to, subscribe to, convert to, or purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in one or more offerings, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the proxy statement. Such authorization has no expiration. Any decision to sell shares of our common stock below its then current NAV per share or issue securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock would be subject to the determination by our board of directors that such issuance is in our and our stockholders’ best interests. If we were to sell shares of our common stock below its then current NAV per share, such sales would result in an immediate dilution to the NAV per share of our common stock. This dilution would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current NAV per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders’ interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest in us than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted. If we issue warrants or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, the exercise or conversion price per share could be less than NAV per share at the time of exercise or conversion (including through the operation of anti-dilution protections). Because we would incur expenses in connection with any issuance of such securities, such issuance could result in a dilution of the NAV per share at the time of exercise or conversion. This dilution would include reduction in NAV per share as a result of the proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders’ interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Further, if our current stockholders do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below the then current NAV per share, their voting power will be diluted. For example, if we sell an additional 10% of our shares of common stock at a 5% discount from NAV, a stockholder who does not participate in that offering for its proportionate interest will suffer NAV dilution of up to 0.5% or $5 per $1,000 of NAV. The terms of the Credit Facility place restrictions on our and/or our subsidiaries’ activities. The terms of the Credit Facility place restrictions on our and/or our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, issue securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations, and in certain cases we may need the approval of BankUnited, as the Administrative Agent, in order to incur further indebtedness. In addition, the Credit Facility contains customary events of default for credit facilities of this type, including (without limitation): nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts after a stated grace period; inaccuracy of material representations and warranties; change of control; violations of covenants, subject in certain cases to stated cure periods; and certain bankruptcies and liquidations. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Company may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, which would adversely affect our liquidity position and, in turn, could force us to dispose of investments at inopportune times at reduced prices. Repayment could also adversely affect our ability to implement our investment strategy and achieve our investment objectives. If we issue preferred stock, the NAV and market value of our common stock may become more volatile. If we issue preferred stock, we cannot assure you that such issuance would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock would likely cause the NAV and market value of our common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of leverage to the holders of our common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of our common stock than if we had not issued preferred stock. Any decline in the NAV of our investments would be borne entirely by the holders of our common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in NAV to the holders of our common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock. This greater NAV decrease would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price for our common stock. We might be in danger of failing to maintain the required asset coverage of the preferred stock or of losing our ratings on the preferred stock or, in an extreme case, our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund a redemption of some or all of the preferred stock. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of our common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, including higher advisory fees if our total return exceeds the dividend rate on the preferred stock. Holders of preferred stock may have different interests than holders of our common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue would have the right to elect members of the board of directors and class voting rights on certain matters. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue, voting separately as a single class, would have the right to elect two members of the board of directors at all times and in the event dividends become two full years in arrears, would have the right to elect a majority of our directors until such arrearage is completely eliminated. In addition, preferred stockholders would have class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status, and accordingly would be able to veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies or the terms of any credit facility to which the Company is a party, might impair our ability to maintain our qualification as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. While we would intend to redeem our preferred stock to the extent necessary to enable us to distribute our income as required to maintain our qualification as a RIC, there can be no assurance that such actions could be effected in time to meet the tax requirements. Our business and operations could be negatively affected if we become subject to any securities class actions and derivative lawsuits, which could cause us to incur significant expense, hinder execution of investment strategy and impact our stock price. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been brought against that company. Stockholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing in the BDC space recently. Securities litigation and stockholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s and our board of directors’ attention and resources from our business. Additionally, such securities litigation and stockholder activism could give rise to perceived uncertainties as to our future, adversely affect our relationships with service providers and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Also, we may be required to incur significant legal fees and other expenses related to any securities litigation and activist stockholder matters. Further, our stock price could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and stockholder activism. Risks of the Insurance Business As of September, 2025, 15.3% of our total assets were invested in NSG, our insurance business, which subjects the Company to various additional special risks. Risks Related to Life Insurance Actual claims and benefits payments may differ from actuarial assumptions and may adversely affect NSG’s financial results, capitalization and financial condition. Due to the nature of the underlying risks and the uncertainty associated with the determination of liabilities for future policy benefits and claims, NSG cannot precisely determine the amounts which it will ultimately pay to settle these liabilities. Because of the inability to determine with precision the amounts required to settle future policy benefits and claims, NSG must rely on actuarial assumptions. Liabilities for future policy benefits and claims are established based on actuarial estimates of how much NSG will need to pay for future benefits and claims. NSG’s earnings significantly depend upon the extent to which its actual claims experience and benefit payments on its products are consistent with such assumptions. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, including with respect to guaranteed options, but those assumptions may be incorrect. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior at the time of pricing, including regarding the selection and utilization of the guaranteed options inherent within certain of its products. A material increase in the valuation of liabilities for future benefit payments could result to the extent that emerging and actual experience deviates from policyholder option utilization assumptions. These assumptions are based in part on expected persistency of the products, which change the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Persistency could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including adverse economic conditions, as well as by developments affecting policyholder perception of NSG and perceptions arising from any potential adverse publicity or negative rating agency actions. If NSG’s actual claims experience differs from the assumptions used to establish reserves for its liabilities, NSG may be required to increase its reserves. NSG evaluates its liabilities regularly based on accounting requirements (which change from time to time), the assumptions and models used to establish the liabilities, as well as actual experience. For example, amounts actually paid may vary materially from the estimated amounts, particularly when those payments may not occur until well into the future. To the extent that actual claims and benefits experience differs from the underlying assumptions used in establishing such liabilities, NSG could be required to increase its reserves for liabilities. An increase in reserves required for any of the above reasons, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations and its profitability measures, as well as materially impact its capitalization, statutory free cash flow and liquidity. This could impact NSG’s risk-based capital ratios and its financial strength ratings, which are necessary to support its product sales, and, in certain circumstances, ultimately impact its solvency. See also “NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition” below. Pricing accuracy depends on accurate morbidity and mortality estimates, but the data on which such estimates are based may be insufficient, incorrect or incomplete. In order to price products accurately, NSG must develop and apply appropriate morbidity and mortality estimates, closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends, and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy to cover these risks. Pricing adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to cover NSG’s cost of sales, costs of operations (including payment of policy benefits) and to earn a profit. Pricing adequacy is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation: availability of sufficient reliable data; incorrect or incomplete analysis of available data; uncertainties inherent in estimates and assumptions; selection and application of appropriate rating formulae or other pricing methodologies; adoption of successful pricing strategies; prediction of policyholder life expectancy and retention; unforeseen or unanticipated events, legislation, regulatory action or court decisions; and unexpected changes in interests rates or inflation. Such risks may result in NSG’s pricing being based on outdated, inadequate, or inaccurate data, or inappropriate analyses, assumptions, or methodologies, and may cause NSG to estimate incorrectly future changes in the frequency or severity of claims. As a result, NSG could underprice risks, which would negatively affect NSG’s margins, or it could overprice risks, which could reduce NSG’s volume and competitiveness. Public health crises, extreme mortality events or similar occurrences may adversely impact NSG’s business, financial condition, or results of operations. NSG’s life insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality, such as a pandemic or other event that causes a large number of deaths, and the likelihood, timing and severity of such events cannot be predicted. Economic uncertainty resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could impact sales of certain of NSG’s products, and NSG may decide or otherwise be required to provide relief to customers adversely affected by such an event. In addition, the impact of climate change could cause changes in the frequency or severity of outbreaks of certain diseases. Circumstances resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could affect the incidence of claims, utilization of benefits, lapses or surrenders of policies and payments on insurance premiums, any of which could impact the revenues and expenses associated with NSG’s products. NSG cannot be certain that the liabilities it has established for claims arising from a catastrophe will be adequate to cover actual claim liabilities. Conversely, improvements in medical care and other developments which positively affect life expectancy can cause NSG’s assumptions with respect to longevity, which it uses when it prices its products, to become incorrect and, accordingly, can adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Liquidity may be adversely affected by policyholder withdrawals and surrenders or if holders of whole life policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater-than-anticipated levels. NSG’s insurance business is exposed to the risk of unanticipated or extraordinary early policyholder withdrawals or surrenders. Early withdrawal and surrender levels may differ from anticipated levels for a variety of reasons, including changes in economic conditions, changes in policyholder behavior or financial needs or increases in surrenders among policies that are no longer subject to surrender charges. In addition, NSG faces potential liquidity risks if policyholders with mature policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater levels than anticipated. If NSG experiences unanticipated early withdrawal or surrender activity or greater than expected lump sum distributions of endowment maturities and lacks sufficient cash flow from its insurance operations to support payment of these benefits, NSG may have to sell its investments in order to meet cash needs or be forced to obtain third-party financing. The availability of such financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the availability of credit in general or more specifically in the insurance industry, the strength or weakness of the capital markets, NSG’s credit capacity, and the perception of NSG’s long- or short-term financial prospects. If NSG is forced to sell its investments on unfavorable terms or obtain financing with unfavorable terms, it could have an adverse effect on NSG’s liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. Changes in surrender activity may also result in remeasurement gains or losses which could increase volatility in NSG’s results of operations. Risks Related to Property & Casualty Insurance If NSG is unable to accurately assess its underwriting risk, its financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. NSG’s underwriting success depends on its ability to accurately assess the risks associated with the business it writes and retains. NSG relies on the experience of its underwriting staff in assessing those risks, and on information provided by insureds or their representatives when underwriting insurance policies. While NSG may make inquiries to validate or supplement the information provided, it may make underwriting decisions based on incorrect or incomplete information. A misunderstanding of the nature or extent of the risks may cause NSG to fail to establish appropriate premium rates which could adversely affect its financial results. The usefulness of models as a tool to evaluate risk is subject to a high degree of uncertainty which could result in actual losses that are materially different from NSG’s estimates and could have a significant adverse impact on NSG’s financial results. NSG’s approach to risk management relies on subjective variables that entail significant uncertainties, and small changes in assumptions which depend heavily on judgment and foresight can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. For example, NSG relies on catastrophe modeling results in its decision-making regarding the upper limits of its catastrophe reinsurance protection. These models simulate loss estimates based on a set of assumptions that impact loss potential, and may not produce accurate predictions. Models used to assess risk are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. These uncertainties can include, among other things, that they may not address all possible hazards, may not reflect the true frequency of events, may not accurately reflect a risk’s vulnerability or susceptibility to damage for a given event, may not accurately represent loss potential to insurance or reinsurance contract coverage limits and other contract terms and may not accurately reflect judicial, political or regulatory impacts. NSG’s losses and loss expense reserves may be inadequate to cover its actual losses, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows. NSG maintains losses and loss expense reserves based on its estimate of the ultimate payment of all claims that have been or could be incurred in the future, and the related costs of adjusting those claims. However, reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather an estimate of what NSG expects settlement and administration claims will cost, and its actual liability may be greater or less than the estimate. These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase NSG’s exposure to losses and there is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of loss reserves. Uncertainties may result from factors including, but not limited to, the emergence of new information after there has been time to appreciate the full extent of covered losses; new theories of liability that are enforced retroactively by courts; increases in the number and severity of claims; increases in costs (such as medical, legal or supply chain costs) to remedy covered losses; and the risk of unanticipated assessments from state underwriting associations or windstorm pools related to losses in excess of the associations or pool’s ability to pay. Unexpected changes in the interpretation of NSG’s coverage or provisions, including loss limitations and exclusions, in its policies could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurances that loss limitations or exclusions in NSG’s policies will be enforceable in the manner intended. As industry practices as well as legal, judicial, social, and other conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. While these limitations and exclusions help NSG to assess and mitigate its loss exposure, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void a limitation or exclusion, or that legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of such limitations or exclusions. In addition, court decisions could read policy exclusions narrowly so as to expand coverage. This could adversely affect NSG’s business by broadening coverage beyond its underwriting intent or by increasing the frequency or severity of claims, and could result in higher than anticipated losses. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until after insurance contracts are issued, and the full extent of liability under such contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could materially and adversely affect its business. Many factors could affect NSG’s ability to accurately and timely pay claims, including the training and experience of its claims representatives, the effectiveness of management, and its ability to develop or select and implement appropriate procedures and systems to support its claims functions, among other factors. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could lead to regulatory action or litigation, undermine its reputation, and adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The property and casualty insurance business is historically cyclical in nature, which may affect NSG’s financial performance, cause its operating results to vary from quarter to quarter and may not be indicative of future performance. The supply of property and casualty insurance is related to prevailing prices, the level of insured losses and the level of capital available to the industry that, in turn, may fluctuate in response to changes in rates of return on investments being earned in the insurance industry. As a result, the property and casualty insurance business historically has been a cyclical industry characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excessive underwriting capacity as well as periods when shortages of capacity increased premium levels. In addition, demand for property and casualty insurance depends on numerous factors, including the frequency and severity of catastrophic events, levels of capacity, the introduction of new capital providers and general economic conditions. All of these factors fluctuate and may contribute to price declines in the insurance industry generally. As a result, NSG’s operating results are subject to fluctuation. If actual renewals do not meet expectations or if NSG chooses not to write renewals because of pricing conditions, its written premium in future years and its future operations would be materially adversely affected. Risks Related to the Insurance Business Generally Competition for business in the insurance industry is intense. NSG faces competition from specialty insurance companies, standard insurance companies and underwriting agencies. Competition among insurance companies is based on a number of factors, including reputation, name recognition, credit ratings, financial strength ratings, relationships with distribution partners, terms and conditions of products offered, and speed of claims payment. In recent years, the insurance industry has undergone increasing consolidation, which may further increase competition. In addition, some of NSG’s competitors are larger and have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than NSG has, and are able to absorb large losses more easily. NSG’s competitors may also offer more competitive pricing, a broader range of products and have greater claims-paying ability. NSG may not be able to continue to compete successfully in the insurance markets. Increased competition in these markets could result in a change in the supply and demand for insurance, affect NSG’s ability to price its products at risk-adequate levels, and lead to reduced profitability or loss of market share. Because NSG’s business depends on insurance retail agents and brokers, NSG is exposed to certain risks arising out of its reliance on these distribution channels. NSG’s products are distributed through independent retail agents and brokers. Retail agents and brokers generally own the renewal rights, making NSG’s business model dependent on its relationships with, and the success of, the retail agents and brokers with whom it does business. NSG relies on a core number of brokers that account for a substantial number of policies, and its relationships with its brokers and retail agents may be discontinued at any time. If one or more such distributors were to terminate its relationship with NSG or reduce the amount of sales it produces, NSG’s results of operations could be adversely affected. Even if the relationships do continue, they may not be on terms that are profitable for NSG. A deterioration in the relationships with distributors or failure to provide competitive compensation could lead these distributors to place more premium with other carriers and less premium with NSG. Also, NSG’s distributors may in any event choose to concentrate their efforts in selling their firm’s own products or other competitors’ products instead of NSG’s products. NSG could also be adversely affected by consolidation in its distribution sales channels. Consolidation could result in loss of market access. NSG could also be negatively affected due to loss of talent as the people most knowledgeable about NSG’s products and with whom NSG has developed strong working relationships exit the business following an acquisition, or, increases in its commission costs as larger distributors acquire more negotiating leverage over their fees. Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers, are collected directly by the brokers and remitted to NSG, and NSG could be adversely affected if the brokers collect premiums but do not remit them to NSG. Despite the premiums not being paid to NSG, NSG may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy. Consequently, NSG assumes a degree of credit risk associated with the brokers with which it works. Similarly, if NSG is limited in its ability to cancel policies for non-payment, its underwriting profits may decline and its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Insurance companies are subject to extensive regulation, which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may change from time to time. NSG is subject to extensive regulation which may adversely affect its ability to achieve its business objectives, and noncompliance with these regulations could subject NSG to penalties, including fines and suspensions, which may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Applicable laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation, and changes in regulation could limit NSG’s discretion or make it more expensive to conduct business. In addition, state insurance regulators have broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations. In some instances, where there is uncertainty as to applicability, NSG follows practices based on its interpretations of regulations or practices that it believes generally to be followed by the industry which may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory authorities. If NSG does not have the requisite licenses and approvals or does not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, state insurance regulators could preclude or temporarily suspend it from carrying on some or all of its activities in their state or could otherwise penalize NSG. This could adversely affect NSG’s ability to operate its business. Further, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities could interfere with NSG’s operations and require it to bear additional costs of compliance, which could adversely affect its ability to operate its business. Also, because its products are sold through independent agents, NSG has less control over how products are sold, including with respect to legal compliance. While NSG expects its agents to comply with their contractual obligations and applicable law, NSG has limited control over how such agents conduct their business. If violations are attributed to NSG, NSG could incur significant fines, and if attributed to its agents, may cause the agents to stop selling NSG’s products. NSG may be unable to purchase reinsurance in amounts desired on acceptable terms, and reinsurers may default or fail to perform. NSG purchases reinsurance from third parties to limit its risk on individual policies, and in the case of property insurance, limit its risk in the event of a catastrophe in various geographic areas (including, without limitation, the risk of hurricanes and tornado activity in the states in which it operates). If NSG is unable to renew expiring reinsurance contracts or enter into new reinsurance arrangements on acceptable terms, NSG’s loss exposure could increase, which would increase potential losses related to such loss events. If NSG is unwilling to bear an increase in loss exposure, it may need to reduce the level of its underwriting commitments which could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, reinsurers may exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts NSG enters into with them. NSG, like other insurance companies, could write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection, but these gaps in reinsurance protection expose NSG to greater risk and greater potential losses. Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to NSG to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, it does not relieve NSG (the ceding insurer) of its primary liability to policyholders. Reinsurers may not pay claims NSG incurs on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Any disputes with reinsurers regarding coverage under reinsurance contracts could be time consuming, costly, and uncertain of success. In addition, NSG’s reinsurance may be concentrated among a few reinsurance carriers, meaning that if one or more of these reinsurers do not renew, default on payment of claims, or become insolvent, NSG could incur increased net losses and its financial condition could be adversely affected. A downgrade or potential downgrade in NSG’s financial strength rating could adversely affect its business. Participants in the insurance industry use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers. Downgrades in NSG’s financial strength rating could cause NSG’s partners to choose more highly rated competitors; increase the cost or reduce the availability of reinsurance; limit or prevent the ability to write or renew insurance contracts; limit access to capital markets; increase costs of capital; reduce new sales of insurance products; increase regulatory scrutiny; provide termination rights to reinsurers; require reduced pricing to remain competitive; and increase the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contract holders and policyholders, among other consequences. Performance of NSG’s investment portfolio is subject to a variety of investment risks that could adversely affect its financial results. NSG’s results of operations depend, in part, on the performance of its investment portfolio, and its investments are subject to general economic conditions and market risks as well as risks inherent to specific securities. NSG’s primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. Should interest rates decline, a low interest rate environment would place pressure on NSG’s net investment income. Increases in interest rates could cause the values of NSG’s fixed income securities portfolios to decline, with the magnitude of the decline depending on the duration of securities included in its portfolio and the amount by which interest rates increase. During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of NSG’s securities if trading becomes less frequent or market data becomes less observable. In addition, in times of financial market disruption, certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data may become illiquid. In those cases, the valuation process includes inputs that are less observable and require more subjectivity and management judgment. If NSG is forced to sell certain of its investments during periods of market volatility or disruption, market prices may be lower than their carrying. This could result in realized losses, which could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. It could also affect financial ratios, bringing NSG out of compliance with its credit instruments and rating agency capital adequacy measures. NSG’s debt investments are subject to the risk that investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or due to deterioration in the financial condition of an insurer that guarantees the issuer’s payments. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturity securities (where rated) could also have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities. Mortgage loans are subject to a variety of risks relating to the supply and demand of leasable commercial space, creditworthiness of tenants and partners, capital markets volatility, interest rate fluctuations and issuer defaults, among others. NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition. NSG maintains reserves to cover its estimated exposure for claims relating to its issued insurance policies. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of exposure, but instead represent NSG’s best estimates using actuarial and statistical procedures. Reserve estimates are refined as experience develops. Because establishing reserves is an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of future losses, future developments may require NSG to increase policy benefit reserves, which would restrict its use of cash that might otherwise be used for other purposes, negatively affecting its results of operations, and limit the dividends and distributions that it is able to make to the Company. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements, and failure to meeting these requirements could subject it to regulatory action or other restrictions. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could result in regulatory action, prevent NSG from selling new business or require guarantees, all of which could have a material and adverse impact on NSG’s competitiveness, operational flexibility, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to satisfy these requirements could also preclude NSG from making dividends and distributions to the Company. A decline in NSG’s risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio could result in increased scrutiny by insurance regulators and rating agencies and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. The NAIC has established model regulations that provide minimum capitalization requirements based on RBC formulas for insurance companies. A failure to meet these requirements could subject NSG to increased scrutiny or corrective action imposed by insurance regulators, including limitations on its ability to write additional business, increased regulatory supervision, or seizure or liquidation. A decline in RBC ratio, whether or not it results in a failure to meet applicable RBC requirements, could limit NSG’s ability to make distributions, could result in a loss of customers or new business or result in a downgrade of NSG’s financial strength rating. Employees of NSG or its third-party service providers may take excessive risks which could negatively affect NSG’s financial condition and business. The individuals who conduct NSG’s business, including its management personnel, sales intermediaries, investment professions, and other employees, as well as employees of various third-party service providers, make decision that could expose NSG to risk. These include decisions such as setting underwriting guidelines and standards, product design and pricing, determining what assets to purchase for investment and when to sell them, which business opportunities to pursue, among other decisions. Such individuals may take excessive risks regardless of the structure of NSG’s risk management framework or its compensation program and practices, which may not effectively deter excessive risk-taking or misconduct. Similarly, NSG’s controls and procedures may not be effective. If NSG’s employees and the employees of third-party service providers take excessive risks, it could suffer material losses in its investment portfolio, be subject to regulatory sanctions and experience harm to its reputation. Difficult conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. The business and results of operations of domestic insurance companies generally are materially affected by conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally. An economic downturn may be characterized by increases in inflation, higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment or lower consumer spending. As a result, the demand for insurance products and their utilization could be adversely affected, as customers are unwilling or unable to purchase policies, choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop paying insurance premiums altogether, surrender their life insurance policies for their cash value or otherwise seek to utilize the cash benefits of their policies or file property and casualty claims at elevated rates. Depending on their level of occurrence, these customer actions could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. Climate change could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s business. Climate change could have a significant impact on longer-term natural weather trends, potentially impacting both NSG’s property and casualty insurance business and its life insurance business. Rising temperatures and changes in weather patterns could impact storm frequency and severity and thereby negatively affect claims experience, reinsurance costs and product pricing in NSG’s property and casualty insurance business. Climate change may also impact life expectancies, influencing mortality assumptions used in pricing and reserve calculations in its insurance business. Because of the unpredictability of the long-term effects of climate change, NSG may be unable to accurately factor these effects into its assumptions and models, and its business could suffer as a result. |  |  |  |  |
NAV Per Share | $ 80.24 | $ 79.37 | $ 70.75 | $ 57.49 | $ 57.08 | $ 55.3
RISK RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | RISK RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE Certain Risks in the Current Environment We are currently operating in a period of capital markets disruptions and economic uncertainty. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect the yields, and increase the risks of, our investments in portfolio companies, and make it more difficult for us to raise equity capital should we choose to do so. From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. The U.S. economy, as well as other major economies, may experience a recession, and we anticipate our businesses would be materially and adversely affected by a prolonged recession in the United States and other major markets. Disruptions in the capital markets have increased the spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. Any recession or future significant market events or disruptions (e.g. pandemics, war, natural disasters or terrorist activities) could have an adverse impact on the ability of lenders to originate loans, the volume and type of loans originated, the ability of borrowers to make payments and the volume and type of amendments and waivers granted to borrowers and remedial actions taken in the event of a borrower default, each of which could negatively impact the amount and quality of loans available for investment by the Company and returns to the Company, among other things. Recession, pandemics and other future market disruptions and/or illiquidity could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and have a material negative impact on our operating results and the fair values of our debt and equity investments. We may have to access, if available, alternative markets for debt and equity capital, and a severe disruption in the global financial markets, deterioration in credit and financing conditions or uncertainty regarding U.S. government spending and deficit levels or other global economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, between 2008 and 2009, the U.S. and global capital markets were unstable as evidenced by periodic disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. Despite actions of the U.S. federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. Equity capital may be difficult to raise during periods of adverse or volatile market conditions because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than NAV without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. Volatility and dislocation in the capital markets can also create a challenging environment in which to raise or access debt capital. The current market and future market conditions similar to those experienced from 2008 through 2009 for any substantial length of time could make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience, including being at a higher cost in a rising interest rate environment. If any of these conditions appear, they may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to increase returns to equity holders through the effective use of leverage, and negatively impact our operating results. In addition, significant changes or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). Significant changes in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell our investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Governmental authorities worldwide have taken increased measures to stabilize the markets and support economic growth. The success of these measures is unknown and they may not be sufficient to address the market dislocations or avert severe and prolonged reductions in economic activity. Events outside of our control, including terrorist attacks, acts of war, natural disasters, significant tariffs or public health crises, could negatively affect the portfolio companies in which we invest and make the valuation of those investments more uncertain. Periods of market volatility have occurred and could continue to occur in response to pandemics or other events outside of our control, including terrorist attacks, acts of war, natural disasters, significant tariffs, public health crises or similar events. These types of events have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect operating results for us and for our portfolio companies. The large-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 resulted in sanctions and market disruptions, including declines in regional and global stock markets, unusual volatility in global commodity markets and significant devaluations of Russian currency. The extent and duration of the military action are impossible to predict but could be significant. Market disruption caused by the Russian military action, and any counter measures or responses thereto (including international sanctions, a downgrade in a country’s credit rating, purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts, tariffs, changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, cyberattacks and espionage) could continue to have severe adverse impacts on regional and/or global securities and commodities markets, including markets for oil and natural gas. These impacts may include reduced market liquidity, distress in credit markets, further disruption of global supply chains, increased risk of inflation, and limited access to investments in certain international markets and/or issuers. In addition, the conflicts in the Middle East and terrorist acts may cause significant volatility in the markets and/or market disruptions. The extent and duration of these military actions, conflicts and resulting market disruptions are impossible to predict, but have been and could continue to be substantial, and any such market disruptions could affect our portfolio companies’ operations. As a result, our portfolio investments could decline in value or our valuation of them could become uncertain. We have evaluated subsequent events from September 30, 2025 through the filing date of this annual report on Form 10-K. However, as the discussion in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the Company’s financial statements for the annual period ended September 30, 2025, the analysis contained herein may not fully account for market event impacts. As of September 30, 2025, the Company valued its portfolio investments in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) based on the facts and circumstances known by the Company at that time, or reasonably expected to be known at that time. Due to the overall volatility that market events may have caused during the months following our most recent valuation (as of September 30, 2025), any valuations conducted now or in the future in conformity with U.S. GAAP could result in a lower fair value of our portfolio. Trade negotiations and related government actions may create regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and our investment strategies and adversely affect the profitability of portfolio companies. Recently, the U.S. government has indicated its intent to alter its approach to international trade policy and in some cases to renegotiate, or potentially terminate, certain existing bilateral or multi-lateral trade agreements and treaties with foreign countries, and has made proposals and taken actions related thereto, and has proposed and/or taken actions to increase tariffs or other duties on goods or products being imported into the U.S. For example, the U.S. government has imposed, and may in the future increase, tariffs on certain foreign goods, including from China, such as steel and aluminum. Some foreign governments, including China, have instituted retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. goods. Recently, the current U.S. presidential administration has proposed and/or imposed significant increases to tariffs on goods imported into the U.S., including from China, Canada, and Mexico. We cannot predict how or what tariffs will be imposed or what retaliatory measures other countries, including China, may take in response to tariffs proposed or imposed by the U.S. Such uncertainty and/or tariffs or counter-measures could further increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of portfolio companies whose businesses rely on imported goods. There is uncertainty as to further actions that may be taken under the current U.S. presidential administration with respect to U.S. trade policy, including with respect to the proposed tariffs. Further governmental actions related to the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers, or changes to international trade agreements or policies, could create further regulatory uncertainty for our portfolio companies and adversely affect their businesses and financial condition, particularly to the extent the revenues and profitability of their businesses rely on goods imported from outside of the United States. Government Policies, Changes in Laws, and International Trade. Governmental regulatory activity, especially that of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, may have a significant effect on interest rates and on the economy generally, which in turn may affect the price of the securities in which the Company plans to invest. High interest rates, the imposition of credit controls or other restraints on the financing of takeovers or other acquisitions could diminish the number of merger tender offers, exchange offers or other acquisitions, and as a consequence have a materially adverse effect on the activities of the Company Moreover, changes in U.S. federal, state, and local tax laws, U.S. federal or state securities and bankruptcy laws or in accounting standards may make corporate acquisitions or restructurings less desirable or make risk arbitrage less profitable. Amendments to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or other relevant laws could also alter an expected outcome or introduce greater uncertainty regarding the likely outcome of an investment situation. In addition, governmental policies could create uncertainty for the global financial system and such uncertainty may increase the risks inherent to the Company and its activities. For example, tariffs and restrictions, as well as other changes in U.S. trade policy, have resulted in, and may continue to trigger, retaliatory actions by affected countries, including imposing trade sanctions on certain U.S. products. A “trade war” of this nature has the potential to increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of companies whose businesses rely on imports and exports. Prospective investors should realize that any significant changes in governmental policies (including tariffs and other policies involving international trade) could have a material adverse impact on the Company and its investments. Rising interest rates may increase our borrowing costs and reduce the net return that we are able to achieve on debt investments in portfolio companies, and may also increase the risk of default on our portfolio company loans. In 2023, the Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates. Additional interest rate increases may come. Changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from our performance to the extent we are exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility. In periods of rising interest rates, such as the current interest rate environment, to the extent we borrow money subject to a floating interest rate, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income. Further, rising interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if such increases cause our borrowing costs to rise at a rate in excess of the rate that our investments yield. Further, rising interest rates could also adversely affect our performance if we hold investments with floating interest rates, subject to specified minimum interest rates (such as a SOFR floor), while at the same time engaging in borrowings subject to floating interest rates not subject to such minimums. In such a scenario, rising interest rates may increase our interest expense, even though our interest income from investments is not increasing in a corresponding manner as a result of such minimum interest rates. If general interest rates rise, there is a risk that the portfolio companies in which we hold floating rate securities will be unable to pay escalating interest amounts, which could result in a default under their loan documents with us. Rising interest rates could also cause portfolio companies to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. In addition, rising interest rates may increase pressure on us to provide fixed rate loans to our portfolio companies, which could adversely affect our net investment income, as increases in our cost of borrowed funds would not be accompanied by increased interest income from such fixed-rate investments. Further downgrades of the U.S. credit rating, automatic spending cuts, or another government shutdown could negatively impact our cost of borrowing and the net return on our investments. U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of additional credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns, or a recession in the United States. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling on multiple occasions, ratings agencies have lowered or threatened to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or its perceived creditworthiness could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. Absent further quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, these developments could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. If our borrowing costs were to rise on account of these factors, and we were unable to raise the rates of return on our portfolio company debt, our net return on investments would decline. Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies, increase our funding costs and limit our access to capital. Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our debt investments during these periods. In the past, instability in the global capital markets resulted in disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major domestic and international financial institutions. In particular, in past periods of instability, the financial services sector was negatively impacted by significant write-offs as the value of the assets held by financial firms declined, impairing their capital positions and abilities to lend and invest. In addition, continued uncertainty between the United States and other countries, including China and Russia, with respect to trade policies, treaties, and tariffs, among other factors, have caused disruption in the global markets. There can be no assurance that market conditions will not worsen in the future. In an economic downturn, we may have non-performing assets or non-performing assets may increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of any collateral securing our loans. A severe recession may further decrease the value of such collateral and result in losses of value in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, assets and net worth. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us on terms we deem acceptable. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results. The occurrence of recessionary conditions and/or negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Any such unfavorable economic conditions, including rising interest rates, may also increase our funding costs, limit our access to capital markets or negatively impact our ability to obtain financing, particularly from the debt markets. In addition, any future financial market uncertainty could lead to financial market disruptions and could further impact our ability to obtain financing. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to Our Business [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Our Business As a result of our internalized operating structure, including our internalized management and investment functions, we may incur significant costs and face significant risks associated with being self-managed, including adverse effects on our business and financial condition. Effective January 1, 2021, we operate under an internalized operating structure, including our management and investment functions. There can be no assurances that our internalized operating structure will be beneficial to us and our stockholders, as we may not be able to effectively replicate the services previously provided to us by our former investment adviser and administrator. While we no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we previously paid under the investment management and administration agreements with our previous adviser and administrator, we have other significant direct expenses. These include general and administrative costs, legal, accounting and other governance expenses and costs and expenses related to managing our portfolio. We also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants. In addition, we may be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and ability to pay distributions. As an internally managed BDC, we are dependent upon our management team and other professionals, and if we are not able to hire and retain qualified personnel, we will not realize the benefits of an internally managed BDC. Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders depends upon the performance of our management team and professionals. We may experience difficulty identifying, engaging and retaining management, investment and general and administrative personnel with the necessary expertise and credit-related investment experience. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to offer more competitive and flexible compensation structures, such as offering both a profit-sharing plan and an equity incentive plan, is subject to the limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, which could limit our ability to attract and retain talented investment management professionals. If we are unable to attract and retain highly talented professionals for the internal management of our Company, we will not realize the benefits of an internally managed BDC, and the results of our operation could deteriorate. We may suffer credit and capital losses. Making private debt and private equity investments is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk of credit and capital loss, and therefore an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with a low tolerance for risk. These risks are likely to increase during an economic recession, such as the economic recession or downturn that the United States and many other countries have recently experienced or are experiencing. Because we use borrowed funds to make investments or fund our business operations, we are exposed to risks typically associated with leverage which increase the risk of investing in us. We have borrowed funds, including through the issuance of $57.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.25% unsecured notes due November 1, 2028 (the “Notes” or the “2028 Notes”) to leverage our capital structure, which is generally considered a speculative investment technique. In addition, on December 15, 2022, the Company entered into a 3-year $50.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Woodforest Bank, N.A. (“Woodforest”), Valley National Bank, and Axiom Bank, (collectively, the “Lenders”), which was amended on February 21, 2024 to increase the principal amount of loan available under the Credit Facility by $12.5 million to $62.5 million. On August 5, 2024 (the “Second Amendment Effective Date”), in order to increase the size of the Credit Facility, the parties to the Credit Facility amended the Credit Facility, effective as of the Second Amendment Effective Date (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment increased the principal amount of loan available under the Credit Facility by $25 million to $87.5 million. On April 17, 2025 (the “Third Amendment Effective Date”), in order to extend the term and increase the size of the Credit Facility, the parties to the Credit Facility amended the terms of the Credit Facility, effective as of the Third Amendment Effective Date (the “Third Amendment”). The Third Amendment increased the principal amount of the loan available under the Credit Facility by $12.5 million to $100.0 million (with potential access to up to an additional $50.0 million pursuant to an uncommitted accordion provision) and appointed BankUnited, N.A. to assume all agency and syndication responsibilities from the prior agent and lenders. The Amendment also extended the term of the credit facility to April 17, 2030, five years from the Third Amendment Effective Date. Other material terms remain substantially unchanged. As a result:
| ● | our common stock may be exposed to an increased risk of loss because a decrease in the value of our investments may have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did not use leverage;
| ● | if we do not appropriately match the assets and liabilities of our business, adverse changes in interest rates could reduce or eliminate the incremental income we make with the proceeds of any leverage;
| ● | our ability to pay distributions on our common stock may be restricted if our asset coverage ratio with respect to each of our outstanding senior securities representing indebtedness and our outstanding preferred shares, as defined by the 1940 Act, is not at least 200% and any amounts used to service indebtedness or preferred stock would not be available for such distributions;
| ● | any credit facility to which we became a party may be subject to periodic renewal by our lenders, whose continued participation cannot be guaranteed;
| ● | any credit facility to which we became a party may contain covenants restricting our operating flexibility;
| ● | we, and indirectly our stockholders, bear the cost of issuing and paying interest or dividends on such securities; and
| ● | any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common shares.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks and other financial institutions, which we collectively refer to as “senior securities”, only in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio equals at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) after each issuance of senior securities. For a discussion of the terms of the Notes, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources.” As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company under the 1940 Act. The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business. We anticipate that our investments generally will be made in private companies. Substantially all of these securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will be otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company. A substantial portion of our portfolio investments will be recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our valuation designee under the oversight of our board of directors and, as a result, there may be uncertainty regarding the value of our portfolio investments. The debt and equity securities in which we invest for which market quotations are not readily available will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our Chief Financial Officer, the Company’s valuation designee, under the oversight of our board of directors. Most of our investments (other than cash and cash equivalents) will be classified as Level 3 under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This means that our portfolio valuations will be based on unobservable inputs and our own assumptions about how market participants would price the asset or liability in question. We expect that inputs into the determination of fair value of our portfolio investments will require significant management judgment or estimation. Even if observable market data are available, such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes, which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimers materially reduces the reliability of such information. We have retained the services of independent valuation firms to review the valuation of various loans and securities. The types of factors that we may take into account in determining the fair value of our investments generally include, as appropriate, comparison to publicly traded securities including such factors as yield, maturity and measures of credit quality, the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these loans and securities existed. Our NAV could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such loans and securities. We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer. We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. We also have not adopted any policy restricting the percentage of our assets that may be invested in a single portfolio company. To the extent that we assume large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, our NAV may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the market’s assessment of the issuer. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified investment company. Beyond our income tax diversification requirements under Subchapter M of the Code, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. (Note our significant investments in our affiliates FlexFIN and NSG – see Risks Related to our Investments). We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments, the value of our common stock and our rate of return on invested capital. A reduction in the interest rates on new investments relative to interest rates on current investments could also have an adverse impact on our net interest income. Further increases in interest rates could decrease the value of any investments we hold which earn fixed interest rates and also could increase our interest expense, thereby decreasing our net income. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate, which could reduce the value of our common stock. Loans under our Credit Facility and the financial credit we extend to our portfolio companies bear interest based on SOFR, but experience with SOFR based loans is limited. Loans under our current Credit Facility bear interest at a rate based upon the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Also, the secured terms loans that we make to our portfolio companies and the secured notes of our portfolio companies in which we invest bear interest at SOFR based rates. SOFR is considered to be a risk-free rate, and USD LIBOR was a risk weighted rate. Thus, SOFR tends to be a lower rate than USD LIBOR, because SOFR does not contain a risk component. This difference may negatively impact our net interest margin of our investments. Also, the use of SOFR based rates is relatively new, and experience with SOFR based rate loans is limited. There could be unanticipated difficulties or disruptions with the calculation and publication of SOFR based rates. This could result in increased borrowing costs for the Company or could adversely impact the interest income we receive from our portfolio companies or the market value of the financial obligations that are due to us from our portfolio companies. Because we use debt to finance various investments, changes in interest rates will affect our cost of capital and net investment income. Because we borrow money to make certain investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income in the event we use our existing debt to finance our investments. In periods of rising interest rates, such as the current period we are in, our cost of funds will increase to the extent we access any credit facility with a floating interest rate, which could reduce our net investment income to the extent any debt investments have fixed interest rates. We expect that our long-term fixed-rate investments will be financed primarily with issuances of equity and long-term debt securities. We may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. You should also be aware that, to the extent we make floating debt investments, a rise in the general level of interest rates typically leads to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. If our investments are not managed effectively, we may be unable to achieve our investment objective. Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to manage our business, which will depend on the internalized management team. Accomplishing this result is largely a function of the internalized management team’s ability to provide quality and efficient services to us. They may also be required to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow our rate of investment. Any failure to manage our business effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may experience fluctuations in our periodic operating results. We could experience fluctuations in our periodic operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the performance of our portfolio companies, the level of our expenses (including the interest rates payable on our borrowings), the dividend rates payable on preferred stock we issue, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods. Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC could reduce our operating flexibility. If we fail to maintain our status as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more onerous regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility. We may have difficulty paying required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, such as PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discount, which could be significant relative to our overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as a result of PIK arrangements are included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash. Since in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to maintain our tax treatment as a RIC. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to raise cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify and maintain our tax treatment as a RIC and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax. See “Taxation as a RIC” and “Failure to Qualify as a RIC”. We may not be able to pay distributions to our shareholders. We cannot assure that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to pay cash distributions. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by, among other things, the impact of one or more of the risk factors described herein. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC could limit our ability to pay distributions. As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to us under the 1940 Act. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC tax treatment, compliance with applicable BDC regulations, and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our stockholders in the future. The highly competitive market in which we operate may limit our investment opportunities. A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make. We compete with other BDCs and investment funds (including public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, SBICs and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds). Additionally, because competition for investment opportunities generally has increased among alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have begun to invest in areas in which they have not traditionally invested. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities has intensified in recent years and may intensify further in the future. Some of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions and valuation requirements that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC and the tax consequences of qualifying as a RIC. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this existing and potentially increasing competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective. We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. A significant part of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market for investments in mid-sized companies is underserved by traditional commercial banks and other financial institutions. A significant increase in the number and/or size of our competitors in this target market could force us to accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, several of our competitors have greater experience operating under the regulatory restrictions of the 1940 Act and under an internalized management structure. In the event we make distributions, we would need additional capital to finance our growth and such capital may not be available on favorable terms or at all. We have elected and intend to qualify annually to be taxed for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we must meet certain requirements, including source-of-income, asset diversification and distribution requirements in order to not have to pay corporate-level U.S. on income we distribute to our stockholders as distributions, which allows us to substantially reduce or eliminate our corporate-level U.S. federal income tax liability. As a BDC, we are generally required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total senior securities, which includes all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) at the time we issue any debt or preferred stock. This requirement limits the amount of our leverage. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt or issuing preferred stock and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. We cannot assure you that debt and equity financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, and debt financings may be restricted by the terms of any of our outstanding borrowings. In addition, as a BDC, we are generally not permitted to issue common stock priced below NAV without stockholder approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease new lending and investment activities, and our NAV could decline. Our board of directors may change our investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice or stockholder approval. Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive certain of our operating policies and strategies (including our investment objective) without prior notice and without stockholder approval. However, absent stockholder approval, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would have on our business, operating results or value of our stock. Nevertheless, the effects could adversely affect our business and impact our ability to make distributions and cause you to lose all or part of your investment. Because we borrow money, the potential for loss on amounts invested in us will be magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for loss on invested equity capital. If we use leverage to partially finance our investments, which we have done historically, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. We issued the Notes, entered into the Credit Facility, and may issue other debt securities or enter into other types of borrowing arrangements in the future. If the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause our NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock distributions or scheduled debt payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and we only intend to use leverage if expected returns will exceed the cost of borrowing. As of September 30, 2025, there was $149.2 million of outstanding borrowings. The weighted average interest rate charged on our borrowings as of September 30, 2025 was 6.5% (exclusive of debt issuance costs). We will need to generate sufficient cash flow to make these required interest payments. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the Notes, the holders thereof will have the right to declare the principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest on the outstanding Notes to be due and payable immediately. If we are unable to meet the financial obligations under the Credit Facility or any other credit facility we enter into, the lenders thereunder would likely have a superior claim to our assets over our stockholders. We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions. Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control and adversely affect our business. There could be:
| ● | sudden electrical or telecommunications outages;
| ● | natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes;
| ● | disease pandemics (such as the COVID-19 outbreak);
| ● | events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts; and
| ● | cyber-attacks.
These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. A failure of cybersecurity systems, as well as the occurrence of events unanticipated in our disaster recovery systems and management continuity planning could impair our ability to conduct business effectively. The occurrence of a disaster, such as a cyber-attack against us, certain portfolio companies, or against a third-party that has access to our data or networks, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of our disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error, could have an adverse effect on our ability to communicate or conduct business (including the business of certain portfolio companies), negatively impacting our operations and financial condition. This adverse effect can become particularly acute if those events affect our electronic data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or impact the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of our data. We depend heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures, our computer systems, networks, and data, like those of other companies, could be subject to cyber-attacks and unauthorized access, use, alteration, or destruction, such as from physical and electronic break-ins or unauthorized tampering, malware and computer virus attacks, or system failures and disruptions. If one or more of these events occurs, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary, and other information processed, stored in, and transmitted through our computer systems and networks. Such an attack could cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations, which could result in financial losses, litigation, regulatory penalties, client dissatisfaction or loss, reputational damage, and increased costs associated with mitigation of damages and remediation. Third parties with which we do business and certain of our portfolio companies may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risks. We outsource certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of our information, as well as customer, counterparty, employee and borrower information. Cybersecurity failures or breaches our service providers (including, but not limited to, accountants, custodians, transfer agents and administrators), and the issuers of securities in which we invest, also have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with our ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, the inability of our stockholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputation damages, reimbursement of other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. While we engage in actions to reduce our exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure or destruction of data, or other cybersecurity incidents, with increased costs and other consequences, including those described above. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. Privacy and information security laws and regulation changes, and compliance with those changes, may result in cost increases due to system changes and the development of new administrative processes. In addition, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks. We currently do not maintain insurance coverage relating to cybersecurity risks, and we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are not fully insured. Technological innovations and industry disruptions, including those related to artificial intelligence and machine learning, may negatively impact us. Technological innovations, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, have disrupted traditional approaches in multiple industries and can permit companies to achieve success and in the process disrupt markets and market practices. We can provide no assurance that new businesses and approaches will not be created that would compete with us and/or our portfolio companies or alter the market practices in which we have been designed to function within and on which we depend on for our investment return. New approaches could damage our investments, disrupt the market in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of investments. We may, subject to internal policies, use artificial intelligence or machine learning in connection with our business activities. The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning carries with it certain risks, including the risks that inputs include confidential or personally identifiable information and that outputs contain inaccuracies and errors. The applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning, including those in the investment and financial sectors, continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict all of the future risks that may arise from such developments. We cannot control the use of artificial intelligence or machine learning in our portfolio companies or third-party products or services and therefore could be exposed to associated risks if our portfolio companies, third-party service providers or any counterparties use artificial intelligence or machine learning in their business activities. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to Our Investments [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Our Investments We may not realize gains from our equity investments. When we make a debt investment, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. Our equity investments may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline significantly in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. Our investments are very risky and highly speculative. We have invested materially in senior secured first lien term loans and senior secured second lien term loans issued by private companies. Senior Secured Loans There is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the business and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additional capital, and, in some circumstances, our lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. In addition, deterioration in a portfolio company’s financial condition and prospects, including its inability to raise additional capital, may be accompanied by deterioration in the value of the collateral for the loan. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies. Equity Investments When we invest in senior secured first lien term loans or senior secured second lien term loans, we may receive warrants or other equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. The warrants or equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our warrants or equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any warrants or equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience. In addition, investing in private companies involves a number of significant risks. See “Our investments in private portfolio companies may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment” below. Our investments in private portfolio companies may be risky, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Investments in private companies involve a number of significant risks. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the ability of our investment professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments. Private companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment. In addition, they typically have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns. Additionally, private companies are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us. Private companies also generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position. In addition, our executive officers and directors may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in these types of companies. We have invested in secured debt issued by our portfolio companies. In the case of our senior secured first lien term loans, the portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with the debt securities in which we invest. With respect to our senior secured second lien term loans, the portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks above or equally with the debt securities in which we invest. In the case of debt ranking above the senior secured second lien term loans in which we invest, we would be subordinate to such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company and therefore the holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share any distributions on an equal and ratable basis with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. Additionally, certain loans that we make to portfolio companies may be secured on a second priority basis by the same collateral securing senior secured debt of such companies. The first priority liens on the collateral will secure the portfolio company’s obligations under any outstanding senior debt and may secure certain other future debt that may be permitted to be incurred by the portfolio company under the agreements governing the loans. The holders of obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral will generally control the liquidation of, and be entitled to receive proceeds from, any realization of the collateral to repay their obligations in full before us. In addition, the value of the collateral in the event of liquidation will depend on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. There can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens after payment in full of all obligations secured by the first priority liens on the collateral. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the loan obligations secured by the second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the portfolio company’s remaining assets, if any. The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the loans we make to our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: (1) the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; (2) the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; (3) the approval of amendments to collateral documents; (4) releases of liens on the collateral; and (5) waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected. Our portfolio companies may prepay loans, which prepayment may reduce stated yields if capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields. Our loans to portfolio companies are prepayable at any time, and most of them at no premium to par. It is uncertain as to when each loan may be prepaid. Whether a loan is prepaid will depend both on the continued positive performance of the portfolio company and the existence of favorable financing market conditions that allow such company the ability to replace existing financing with less expensive capital. As market conditions change frequently, it is unknown when, and if, this may be possible for each portfolio company. In the case of some of these loans, having the loan prepaid early may reduce the achievable yield for us below the stated yield to maturity contained herein if the capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater expected yields. Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio and our ability to make follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies may be restricted. Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, provided that there are no restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments in order to: (1) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (2) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (3) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our initial investment. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. Our failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make such follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, because we are inhibited by compliance with BDC requirements or because we might lose our RIC tax treatment. We also may be restricted from making follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies to the extent that affiliates of ours hold interests in such companies. As of September 30, 2025, 15.3% of our total assets were invested in NSG, our insurance business. This significant exposure subjects our Company to various risks associated with such business to a much greater extent than companies not similarly concentrated. As of September 30, 2025, 11.7% of our total assets were invested in FlexFIN, our affiliate’s asset-based lending business. This significant exposure subjects our Company to various risks associated with such business (which are identified below) to a much greater extent than companies not similarly concentrated. Client borrowers, particularly with respect to asset-based lending activities, may lack the operating history, cash flows or balance sheet necessary to support other financing options and may expose us to additional risk. A portion of our loan portfolio consists, through FlexFIN, of asset-based lending involving gemstones. Some of these products arise out of relationships with clients who lack the operating history, cash flows or balance sheet necessary to qualify for other financing options. This could increase our risk of loss. 11.7% of the Company’s total assets (as of September 30, 2025) are invested in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business and its activities are influenced by volatility in prices of gemstones and jewelry. Our affiliate’s asset-based lending business is impacted by volatility in gemstone and jewelry prices. Among the factors that can impact the price of gemstones and jewelry are supply and demand of gemstones; political, economic, and global financial events; movement of the U.S. dollar versus other currencies; and the activity of large speculators and other participants. A significant decline in market prices of gemstones could result in reduced collateral value and losses, (i.e., a lower balance of asset-based loans outstanding for the Company’s affiliate.) The gemstones and jewelry business is subject to the risk of fraud and counterfeiting. The gemstones business is exposed to the risk of loss as a result of fraud in its various forms. We seek to minimize our exposure to fraud through a number of means, including third-party authentication and verification and the establishment of procedures designed to detect fraud. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing or identifying fraud, or in obtaining redress in the event such fraud is detected. We may be subject to risks associated with our investments in unitranche loans Unitranche loans provide leverage levels comparable to a combination of first lien and second lien or subordinated loans, and may rank junior to other debt instruments issued by the portfolio company. Unitranche loans generally allow the borrower to make a large lump sum payment of principal at the end of the loan term, and there is a heightened risk of loss if the borrower is unable to pay the lump sum or refinance the amount owed at maturity. From the perspective of a lender, in addition to making a single loan, a unitranche loan may allow the lender to choose to participate in the “first out” tranche, which will generally receive priority with respect to payments of principal, interest and any other amounts due, or to choose to participate only in the “last out” tranche, which is generally paid only after the first out tranche is paid. We may participate in “first out” and “last out” tranches of unitranche loans and make single unitranche loans, and we may suffer losses on such loans if the borrower is unable to make required payments when due. Covenant-Lite Loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants. A significant number of high yield loans in the market may consist of covenant-lite loans, or “Covenant-Lite Loans.” A significant portion of the loans in which we may invest or get exposure to through our investments may be deemed to be Covenant-Lite Loans. Such loans do not require the borrower to maintain debt service or other financial ratios and do not include terms which allow the lender to monitor the performance of the borrower and declare a default if certain criteria are breached. Ownership of Covenant-Lite Loans may expose us to different risks, including with respect to liquidity, price volatility, ability to restructure loans, credit risks and less protective loan documentation, than is the case with loans that contain financial maintenance covenants. As a BDC, our ability to invest in public companies and foreign companies is limited by the 1940 Act. To maintain our tax treatment as a BDC, we are not permitted to acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” specified in the 1940 Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets (with certain limited exceptions). Subject to certain exceptions for follow-on investments and distressed companies, an investment in an issuer that has outstanding securities listed on a national securities exchange may be treated as qualifying assets only if such issuer has a market capitalization that is less than $250 million at the time of such investment. In addition, we may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in opportunistic investments which will be intended to diversify or complement the remainder of our portfolio and to enhance our returns to stockholders. These investments may include private equity investments, securities of public companies that are broadly traded and securities of non-U.S. companies. We expect that these public companies generally will have debt securities that are non-investment grade. Our investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments. A portion of our investments may be in securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Although it is anticipated that most of our investments will be denominated in U.S. dollars, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency may change in relation to the U.S. dollar. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk or, that if we do, such strategies will be effective. As a result, a change in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our profitability. Hedging transactions may expose us to additional risks. We may engage in currency or interest rate hedging transactions. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price. While we may enter into transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek or be able to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. The disposition of our investments may result in contingent liabilities. We currently expect that a significant portion of our investments will involve lending directly to private companies. In connection with the disposition of an investment in private securities, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the portfolio company typical of those made in connection with the sale of a business. We may also be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment to the extent that any such representations turn out to be inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities that ultimately yield funding obligations that must be satisfied through our return of certain distributions previously made to us. If we invest in the securities and obligations of distressed and bankrupt issuers, we might not receive interest or other payments. We may invest in the securities and obligations of distressed and bankrupt issuers, including debt obligations that are in covenant or payment default. Such investments generally are considered speculative. The repayment of defaulted obligations is subject to significant uncertainties. Defaulted obligations might be repaid only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings, during which the issuer of those obligations might not make any interest or other payments. We may not realize gains from our equity investments. We are subject to risks associated with significant investments in one or more economic sectors and/or industries, including the business services sector, which includes our investment in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business. At times, the Company may have a significant portion of its assets invested in securities of companies conducting business within one or more economic sectors and/or industries, including the Services: Business sector, which includes our investment in an asset-based lending business and the insurance sector. Companies in the same sector or industry may be similarly affected by economic, regulatory, political or market events or conditions, which may make the Company more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in that sector or industry than companies that invest more broadly. Generally, the more broadly the Company invests, the more it spreads risk and potentially reduces the risks of loss and volatility. As of September 30, 2025, investments in our affiliate’s asset-based lending business constituted 11.7% of our total assets. See above, under Item 1A for risk factors related to our investment in that business. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to Our Operations as a BDC and a RIC [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Our Operations as a BDC and a RIC Regulations governing our operation as a BDC may limit our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Our business requires a substantial amount of capital to operate and grow. We may acquire additional capital from the issuance of senior securities (including debt and preferred stock), the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or from securitization transactions. However, we may not be able to raise additional capital in the future on favorable terms or at all. Additionally, we may only issue senior securities up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act permits us to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% (or 150% if, pursuant to the 1940 Act, certain requirements are met) after such issuance or incurrence. If our assets decline in value and we fail to satisfy this test, we may be required to liquidate a portion of our investments and repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales or repayment may be disadvantageous, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s asset coverage was 207.8% after giving effect to leverage and therefore the Company’s asset coverage is above 200%, the minimum asset coverage requirement applicable to us under the 1940 Act. Changes in the laws or regulations governing our business, or changes in the interpretations thereof, and any failure by us to comply with these laws or regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Changes in the laws or regulations or the interpretations of the laws and regulations that govern BDCs, RICs or non-depository commercial lenders could significantly affect our operations and our cost of doing business. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations and are subject to judicial and administrative decisions that affect our operations, including our loan originations, maximum interest rates, fees and other charges, disclosures to portfolio companies, the terms of secured transactions, collection and foreclosure procedures and other trade practices. If these laws, regulations or decisions change, or if we expand our business into jurisdictions that have adopted more stringent requirements than those in which we currently conduct business, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply, or we might have to restrict our operations. In addition, if we do not comply with applicable laws, regulations and decisions, we may lose licenses needed for the conduct of our business and may be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties. As an internally managed BDC, we are subject to certain restrictions that may adversely affect our ability to offer certain compensation structures. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to offer more competitive and flexible compensation structures, such as offering both a profit-sharing plan and an equity incentive plan, is subject to the limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, which limits our ability to attract and retain talented investment management professionals. As such, these limitations could inhibit our ability to grow, pursue our business plan and attract and retain professional talent, any or all of which may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As an internally managed BDC, we are dependent upon our management team and investment professionals for their time availability and for our future success, and if we are not able to hire and retain qualified personnel, or if we lose key members of our senior management team, our ability to implement our business strategy could be significantly harmed. As an internally managed BDC, our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders depends upon the performance of our management team and investment professionals. We depend upon the members of our management and our investment professionals for the identification, final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our investments. These employees have critical industry experience and relationships on which we rely to implement our business plan. If we lose the services of key members of our senior management team, we may not be able to operate the business as we expect, and our ability to compete could be harmed, which could cause our operating results to suffer. We believe our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to identify, attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly skilled employees. If we do not succeed in identifying, attracting and retaining such personnel, we may not be able to operate our business as we expect. As an internally managed BDC, our compensation structure is determined and set by our Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee. This structure currently includes salary, bonus and incentive compensation. We are subject to limitations by the 1940 Act on our ability to employ an incentive compensation structure that directly ties performance of our investment portfolio and results of operations to incentive compensation. Members of our senior management team may receive offers of more flexible and attractive compensation arrangements from other companies, particularly from investment advisers to externally managed BDCs that are not subject to the same limitations on incentive-based compensation that we are subject to as an internally managed BDC. A departure by one or more members of our senior management team could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot predict how tax reform legislation will affect us, our investments, or our stockholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business. Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us, our investments, or our stockholders. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. We cannot predict with certainty how any changes in the tax laws might affect us, our stockholders, or our portfolio investments. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to us and our stockholders of such qualification, or could have other adverse consequences. Stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities. Legislation that became effective in 2018 may allow the Company to incur additional leverage, which could increase the risk of investing in the Company. The 1940 Act generally prohibits the Company from incurring indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets). However, in March 2018, the SBCA was signed into law, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs. The SBCA included changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement from 200% to 150%, if certain requirements are met. Under the 1940 Act, the Company is allowed to increase its leverage capacity if our stockholders representing at least a majority of the votes cast, when a quorum is present, approve a proposal to do so. If we receive stockholder approval, we would be allowed to increase our leverage capacity on the first day after such approval. Alternatively, the 1940 Acts allows the majority of our independent directors to approve an increase in our leverage capacity, and such approval would become effective after the one-year anniversary of such proposal. In either case, we would be required to make certain disclosures on our website and in SEC filings regarding, among other things, the receipt of approval to increase our leverage, our leverage capacity and usage, and risks related to leverage. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique and increases the risk of investing in our securities. Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital. As we use leverage to partially finance our investments, our stockholders will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the NAV attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect the Company’s ability to pay common stock dividends, scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. See “Regulation”. Our intent is that a substantial portion of the investments that we acquire will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could be found to be in violation of the 1940 Act provisions applicable to BDCs and possibly lose our tax treatment as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We would become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax if we are unable to maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code or satisfy RIC distribution requirements. We have elected, and intend to qualify annually, to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. No assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain our qualification as a RIC. To maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements.
| ● | The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we timely distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next year and pay a 4% U.S. federal excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year that generated such taxable income.
| ● | The source of income requirement is satisfied if we obtain at least 90% of our gross income for each taxable year from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or other securities or foreign currencies or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies and net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (as defined in the Code).
| ● | The asset diversification requirement is satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement, at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity securities of a “qualified publicly traded partnership”). In addition, no more than 25% of the value of our assets can be invested in the securities, other than U.S. Government securities or securities of other RICs, (1) of one issuer (2) of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (3) of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships”.
If we fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment for any reason or are subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax, the resulting corporate-level taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. In addition, to the extent we had unrealized gains, we would have to establish deferred tax liabilities for taxes, which would reduce our NAV accordingly. In addition, our stockholders would lose the tax credit realized if we, as a RIC, decide to retain the net realized capital gain and make deemed distributions of net realized capital gains, and pay taxes on behalf of our stockholders at the end of the tax year. The loss of this pass-through tax treatment could have a material adverse effect on the total return of an investment in our common stock. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Relating to an Investment in Our Securities [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Relating to an Investment in Our Securities Investing in our securities may involve an above average degree of risk. The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and a higher risk of volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of risk and, therefore, an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance. Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may, at times, trade at a discount to their NAV and the Company’s shares have not traded at or above NAV since the first quarter of 2015. Shares of closed-end investment companies, including business development companies, may, at times, trade at a discount from NAV. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies and business development companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our NAV per share may decline. Our common stock has not traded at or above NAV since the first quarter of 2015, and we cannot predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or below NAV in the future. The market price of our common stock fluctuates. The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock fluctuates and may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:
| ● | significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of business development companies or other companies in our sector, which are not necessarily related to the operating performance of the companies;
| ● | changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to BDCs or RICs;
| ● | loss of our qualification as a RIC or BDC;
| ● | changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
| ● | changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
| ● | changes in accounting guidelines governing valuation of our investments;
| ● | any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
| ● | departure of our key personnel;
| ● | operating performance of companies comparable to us;
| ● | general economic trends and other external factors; and
| ● | loss of a major funding source.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. The Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change in control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price of our common stock. The NAV per share of our common stock may be diluted if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current NAV per share of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock. While we currently do not have the requisite stockholder approval to sell shares of our common stock at a price or prices below our then current NAV per share, we may seek such approval in the future. In addition, at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we received approval from our stockholders to authorize the Company, with the approval of our board of directors, to issue securities to, subscribe to, convert to, or purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in one or more offerings, subject to certain conditions as set forth in the proxy statement. Such authorization has no expiration. Any decision to sell shares of our common stock below its then current NAV per share or issue securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock would be subject to the determination by our board of directors that such issuance is in our and our stockholders’ best interests. If we were to sell shares of our common stock below its then current NAV per share, such sales would result in an immediate dilution to the NAV per share of our common stock. This dilution would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current NAV per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders’ interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest in us than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted. If we issue warrants or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, the exercise or conversion price per share could be less than NAV per share at the time of exercise or conversion (including through the operation of anti-dilution protections). Because we would incur expenses in connection with any issuance of such securities, such issuance could result in a dilution of the NAV per share at the time of exercise or conversion. This dilution would include reduction in NAV per share as a result of the proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders’ interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Further, if our current stockholders do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below the then current NAV per share, their voting power will be diluted. For example, if we sell an additional 10% of our shares of common stock at a 5% discount from NAV, a stockholder who does not participate in that offering for its proportionate interest will suffer NAV dilution of up to 0.5% or $5 per $1,000 of NAV. The terms of the Credit Facility place restrictions on our and/or our subsidiaries’ activities. The terms of the Credit Facility place restrictions on our and/or our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, issue securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations, and in certain cases we may need the approval of BankUnited, as the Administrative Agent, in order to incur further indebtedness. In addition, the Credit Facility contains customary events of default for credit facilities of this type, including (without limitation): nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts after a stated grace period; inaccuracy of material representations and warranties; change of control; violations of covenants, subject in certain cases to stated cure periods; and certain bankruptcies and liquidations. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the Company may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, which would adversely affect our liquidity position and, in turn, could force us to dispose of investments at inopportune times at reduced prices. Repayment could also adversely affect our ability to implement our investment strategy and achieve our investment objectives. If we issue preferred stock, the NAV and market value of our common stock may become more volatile. If we issue preferred stock, we cannot assure you that such issuance would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock would likely cause the NAV and market value of our common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of leverage to the holders of our common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of our common stock than if we had not issued preferred stock. Any decline in the NAV of our investments would be borne entirely by the holders of our common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in NAV to the holders of our common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock. This greater NAV decrease would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price for our common stock. We might be in danger of failing to maintain the required asset coverage of the preferred stock or of losing our ratings on the preferred stock or, in an extreme case, our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund a redemption of some or all of the preferred stock. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of our common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, including higher advisory fees if our total return exceeds the dividend rate on the preferred stock. Holders of preferred stock may have different interests than holders of our common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue would have the right to elect members of the board of directors and class voting rights on certain matters. Holders of any preferred stock we might issue, voting separately as a single class, would have the right to elect two members of the board of directors at all times and in the event dividends become two full years in arrears, would have the right to elect a majority of our directors until such arrearage is completely eliminated. In addition, preferred stockholders would have class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status, and accordingly would be able to veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies or the terms of any credit facility to which the Company is a party, might impair our ability to maintain our qualification as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. While we would intend to redeem our preferred stock to the extent necessary to enable us to distribute our income as required to maintain our qualification as a RIC, there can be no assurance that such actions could be effected in time to meet the tax requirements. Our business and operations could be negatively affected if we become subject to any securities class actions and derivative lawsuits, which could cause us to incur significant expense, hinder execution of investment strategy and impact our stock price. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been brought against that company. Stockholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing in the BDC space recently. Securities litigation and stockholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s and our board of directors’ attention and resources from our business. Additionally, such securities litigation and stockholder activism could give rise to perceived uncertainties as to our future, adversely affect our relationships with service providers and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Also, we may be required to incur significant legal fees and other expenses related to any securities litigation and activist stockholder matters. Further, our stock price could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and stockholder activism. |  |  |  |  |
Risks of the Insurance Business [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks of the Insurance Business As of September, 2025, 15.3% of our total assets were invested in NSG, our insurance business, which subjects the Company to various additional special risks. Risks Related to Life Insurance Actual claims and benefits payments may differ from actuarial assumptions and may adversely affect NSG’s financial results, capitalization and financial condition. Due to the nature of the underlying risks and the uncertainty associated with the determination of liabilities for future policy benefits and claims, NSG cannot precisely determine the amounts which it will ultimately pay to settle these liabilities. Because of the inability to determine with precision the amounts required to settle future policy benefits and claims, NSG must rely on actuarial assumptions. Liabilities for future policy benefits and claims are established based on actuarial estimates of how much NSG will need to pay for future benefits and claims. NSG’s earnings significantly depend upon the extent to which its actual claims experience and benefit payments on its products are consistent with such assumptions. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, including with respect to guaranteed options, but those assumptions may be incorrect. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior at the time of pricing, including regarding the selection and utilization of the guaranteed options inherent within certain of its products. A material increase in the valuation of liabilities for future benefit payments could result to the extent that emerging and actual experience deviates from policyholder option utilization assumptions. These assumptions are based in part on expected persistency of the products, which change the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Persistency could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including adverse economic conditions, as well as by developments affecting policyholder perception of NSG and perceptions arising from any potential adverse publicity or negative rating agency actions. If NSG’s actual claims experience differs from the assumptions used to establish reserves for its liabilities, NSG may be required to increase its reserves. NSG evaluates its liabilities regularly based on accounting requirements (which change from time to time), the assumptions and models used to establish the liabilities, as well as actual experience. For example, amounts actually paid may vary materially from the estimated amounts, particularly when those payments may not occur until well into the future. To the extent that actual claims and benefits experience differs from the underlying assumptions used in establishing such liabilities, NSG could be required to increase its reserves for liabilities. An increase in reserves required for any of the above reasons, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations and its profitability measures, as well as materially impact its capitalization, statutory free cash flow and liquidity. This could impact NSG’s risk-based capital ratios and its financial strength ratings, which are necessary to support its product sales, and, in certain circumstances, ultimately impact its solvency. See also “NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition” below. Pricing accuracy depends on accurate morbidity and mortality estimates, but the data on which such estimates are based may be insufficient, incorrect or incomplete. In order to price products accurately, NSG must develop and apply appropriate morbidity and mortality estimates, closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends, and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy to cover these risks. Pricing adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to cover NSG’s cost of sales, costs of operations (including payment of policy benefits) and to earn a profit. Pricing adequacy is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation: availability of sufficient reliable data; incorrect or incomplete analysis of available data; uncertainties inherent in estimates and assumptions; selection and application of appropriate rating formulae or other pricing methodologies; adoption of successful pricing strategies; prediction of policyholder life expectancy and retention; unforeseen or unanticipated events, legislation, regulatory action or court decisions; and unexpected changes in interests rates or inflation. Such risks may result in NSG’s pricing being based on outdated, inadequate, or inaccurate data, or inappropriate analyses, assumptions, or methodologies, and may cause NSG to estimate incorrectly future changes in the frequency or severity of claims. As a result, NSG could underprice risks, which would negatively affect NSG’s margins, or it could overprice risks, which could reduce NSG’s volume and competitiveness. Public health crises, extreme mortality events or similar occurrences may adversely impact NSG’s business, financial condition, or results of operations. NSG’s life insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality, such as a pandemic or other event that causes a large number of deaths, and the likelihood, timing and severity of such events cannot be predicted. Economic uncertainty resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could impact sales of certain of NSG’s products, and NSG may decide or otherwise be required to provide relief to customers adversely affected by such an event. In addition, the impact of climate change could cause changes in the frequency or severity of outbreaks of certain diseases. Circumstances resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could affect the incidence of claims, utilization of benefits, lapses or surrenders of policies and payments on insurance premiums, any of which could impact the revenues and expenses associated with NSG’s products. NSG cannot be certain that the liabilities it has established for claims arising from a catastrophe will be adequate to cover actual claim liabilities. Conversely, improvements in medical care and other developments which positively affect life expectancy can cause NSG’s assumptions with respect to longevity, which it uses when it prices its products, to become incorrect and, accordingly, can adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Liquidity may be adversely affected by policyholder withdrawals and surrenders or if holders of whole life policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater-than-anticipated levels. NSG’s insurance business is exposed to the risk of unanticipated or extraordinary early policyholder withdrawals or surrenders. Early withdrawal and surrender levels may differ from anticipated levels for a variety of reasons, including changes in economic conditions, changes in policyholder behavior or financial needs or increases in surrenders among policies that are no longer subject to surrender charges. In addition, NSG faces potential liquidity risks if policyholders with mature policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater levels than anticipated. If NSG experiences unanticipated early withdrawal or surrender activity or greater than expected lump sum distributions of endowment maturities and lacks sufficient cash flow from its insurance operations to support payment of these benefits, NSG may have to sell its investments in order to meet cash needs or be forced to obtain third-party financing. The availability of such financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the availability of credit in general or more specifically in the insurance industry, the strength or weakness of the capital markets, NSG’s credit capacity, and the perception of NSG’s long- or short-term financial prospects. If NSG is forced to sell its investments on unfavorable terms or obtain financing with unfavorable terms, it could have an adverse effect on NSG’s liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. Changes in surrender activity may also result in remeasurement gains or losses which could increase volatility in NSG’s results of operations. Risks Related to Property & Casualty Insurance If NSG is unable to accurately assess its underwriting risk, its financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. NSG’s underwriting success depends on its ability to accurately assess the risks associated with the business it writes and retains. NSG relies on the experience of its underwriting staff in assessing those risks, and on information provided by insureds or their representatives when underwriting insurance policies. While NSG may make inquiries to validate or supplement the information provided, it may make underwriting decisions based on incorrect or incomplete information. A misunderstanding of the nature or extent of the risks may cause NSG to fail to establish appropriate premium rates which could adversely affect its financial results. The usefulness of models as a tool to evaluate risk is subject to a high degree of uncertainty which could result in actual losses that are materially different from NSG’s estimates and could have a significant adverse impact on NSG’s financial results. NSG’s approach to risk management relies on subjective variables that entail significant uncertainties, and small changes in assumptions which depend heavily on judgment and foresight can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. For example, NSG relies on catastrophe modeling results in its decision-making regarding the upper limits of its catastrophe reinsurance protection. These models simulate loss estimates based on a set of assumptions that impact loss potential, and may not produce accurate predictions. Models used to assess risk are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. These uncertainties can include, among other things, that they may not address all possible hazards, may not reflect the true frequency of events, may not accurately reflect a risk’s vulnerability or susceptibility to damage for a given event, may not accurately represent loss potential to insurance or reinsurance contract coverage limits and other contract terms and may not accurately reflect judicial, political or regulatory impacts. NSG’s losses and loss expense reserves may be inadequate to cover its actual losses, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows. NSG maintains losses and loss expense reserves based on its estimate of the ultimate payment of all claims that have been or could be incurred in the future, and the related costs of adjusting those claims. However, reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather an estimate of what NSG expects settlement and administration claims will cost, and its actual liability may be greater or less than the estimate. These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase NSG’s exposure to losses and there is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of loss reserves. Uncertainties may result from factors including, but not limited to, the emergence of new information after there has been time to appreciate the full extent of covered losses; new theories of liability that are enforced retroactively by courts; increases in the number and severity of claims; increases in costs (such as medical, legal or supply chain costs) to remedy covered losses; and the risk of unanticipated assessments from state underwriting associations or windstorm pools related to losses in excess of the associations or pool’s ability to pay. Unexpected changes in the interpretation of NSG’s coverage or provisions, including loss limitations and exclusions, in its policies could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurances that loss limitations or exclusions in NSG’s policies will be enforceable in the manner intended. As industry practices as well as legal, judicial, social, and other conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. While these limitations and exclusions help NSG to assess and mitigate its loss exposure, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void a limitation or exclusion, or that legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of such limitations or exclusions. In addition, court decisions could read policy exclusions narrowly so as to expand coverage. This could adversely affect NSG’s business by broadening coverage beyond its underwriting intent or by increasing the frequency or severity of claims, and could result in higher than anticipated losses. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until after insurance contracts are issued, and the full extent of liability under such contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could materially and adversely affect its business. Many factors could affect NSG’s ability to accurately and timely pay claims, including the training and experience of its claims representatives, the effectiveness of management, and its ability to develop or select and implement appropriate procedures and systems to support its claims functions, among other factors. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could lead to regulatory action or litigation, undermine its reputation, and adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The property and casualty insurance business is historically cyclical in nature, which may affect NSG’s financial performance, cause its operating results to vary from quarter to quarter and may not be indicative of future performance. The supply of property and casualty insurance is related to prevailing prices, the level of insured losses and the level of capital available to the industry that, in turn, may fluctuate in response to changes in rates of return on investments being earned in the insurance industry. As a result, the property and casualty insurance business historically has been a cyclical industry characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excessive underwriting capacity as well as periods when shortages of capacity increased premium levels. In addition, demand for property and casualty insurance depends on numerous factors, including the frequency and severity of catastrophic events, levels of capacity, the introduction of new capital providers and general economic conditions. All of these factors fluctuate and may contribute to price declines in the insurance industry generally. As a result, NSG’s operating results are subject to fluctuation. If actual renewals do not meet expectations or if NSG chooses not to write renewals because of pricing conditions, its written premium in future years and its future operations would be materially adversely affected. Risks Related to the Insurance Business Generally Competition for business in the insurance industry is intense. NSG faces competition from specialty insurance companies, standard insurance companies and underwriting agencies. Competition among insurance companies is based on a number of factors, including reputation, name recognition, credit ratings, financial strength ratings, relationships with distribution partners, terms and conditions of products offered, and speed of claims payment. In recent years, the insurance industry has undergone increasing consolidation, which may further increase competition. In addition, some of NSG’s competitors are larger and have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than NSG has, and are able to absorb large losses more easily. NSG’s competitors may also offer more competitive pricing, a broader range of products and have greater claims-paying ability. NSG may not be able to continue to compete successfully in the insurance markets. Increased competition in these markets could result in a change in the supply and demand for insurance, affect NSG’s ability to price its products at risk-adequate levels, and lead to reduced profitability or loss of market share. Because NSG’s business depends on insurance retail agents and brokers, NSG is exposed to certain risks arising out of its reliance on these distribution channels. NSG’s products are distributed through independent retail agents and brokers. Retail agents and brokers generally own the renewal rights, making NSG’s business model dependent on its relationships with, and the success of, the retail agents and brokers with whom it does business. NSG relies on a core number of brokers that account for a substantial number of policies, and its relationships with its brokers and retail agents may be discontinued at any time. If one or more such distributors were to terminate its relationship with NSG or reduce the amount of sales it produces, NSG’s results of operations could be adversely affected. Even if the relationships do continue, they may not be on terms that are profitable for NSG. A deterioration in the relationships with distributors or failure to provide competitive compensation could lead these distributors to place more premium with other carriers and less premium with NSG. Also, NSG’s distributors may in any event choose to concentrate their efforts in selling their firm’s own products or other competitors’ products instead of NSG’s products. NSG could also be adversely affected by consolidation in its distribution sales channels. Consolidation could result in loss of market access. NSG could also be negatively affected due to loss of talent as the people most knowledgeable about NSG’s products and with whom NSG has developed strong working relationships exit the business following an acquisition, or, increases in its commission costs as larger distributors acquire more negotiating leverage over their fees. Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers, are collected directly by the brokers and remitted to NSG, and NSG could be adversely affected if the brokers collect premiums but do not remit them to NSG. Despite the premiums not being paid to NSG, NSG may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy. Consequently, NSG assumes a degree of credit risk associated with the brokers with which it works. Similarly, if NSG is limited in its ability to cancel policies for non-payment, its underwriting profits may decline and its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Insurance companies are subject to extensive regulation, which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may change from time to time. NSG is subject to extensive regulation which may adversely affect its ability to achieve its business objectives, and noncompliance with these regulations could subject NSG to penalties, including fines and suspensions, which may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Applicable laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation, and changes in regulation could limit NSG’s discretion or make it more expensive to conduct business. In addition, state insurance regulators have broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations. In some instances, where there is uncertainty as to applicability, NSG follows practices based on its interpretations of regulations or practices that it believes generally to be followed by the industry which may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory authorities. If NSG does not have the requisite licenses and approvals or does not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, state insurance regulators could preclude or temporarily suspend it from carrying on some or all of its activities in their state or could otherwise penalize NSG. This could adversely affect NSG’s ability to operate its business. Further, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities could interfere with NSG’s operations and require it to bear additional costs of compliance, which could adversely affect its ability to operate its business. Also, because its products are sold through independent agents, NSG has less control over how products are sold, including with respect to legal compliance. While NSG expects its agents to comply with their contractual obligations and applicable law, NSG has limited control over how such agents conduct their business. If violations are attributed to NSG, NSG could incur significant fines, and if attributed to its agents, may cause the agents to stop selling NSG’s products. NSG may be unable to purchase reinsurance in amounts desired on acceptable terms, and reinsurers may default or fail to perform. NSG purchases reinsurance from third parties to limit its risk on individual policies, and in the case of property insurance, limit its risk in the event of a catastrophe in various geographic areas (including, without limitation, the risk of hurricanes and tornado activity in the states in which it operates). If NSG is unable to renew expiring reinsurance contracts or enter into new reinsurance arrangements on acceptable terms, NSG’s loss exposure could increase, which would increase potential losses related to such loss events. If NSG is unwilling to bear an increase in loss exposure, it may need to reduce the level of its underwriting commitments which could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, reinsurers may exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts NSG enters into with them. NSG, like other insurance companies, could write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection, but these gaps in reinsurance protection expose NSG to greater risk and greater potential losses. Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to NSG to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, it does not relieve NSG (the ceding insurer) of its primary liability to policyholders. Reinsurers may not pay claims NSG incurs on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Any disputes with reinsurers regarding coverage under reinsurance contracts could be time consuming, costly, and uncertain of success. In addition, NSG’s reinsurance may be concentrated among a few reinsurance carriers, meaning that if one or more of these reinsurers do not renew, default on payment of claims, or become insolvent, NSG could incur increased net losses and its financial condition could be adversely affected. A downgrade or potential downgrade in NSG’s financial strength rating could adversely affect its business. Participants in the insurance industry use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers. Downgrades in NSG’s financial strength rating could cause NSG’s partners to choose more highly rated competitors; increase the cost or reduce the availability of reinsurance; limit or prevent the ability to write or renew insurance contracts; limit access to capital markets; increase costs of capital; reduce new sales of insurance products; increase regulatory scrutiny; provide termination rights to reinsurers; require reduced pricing to remain competitive; and increase the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contract holders and policyholders, among other consequences. Performance of NSG’s investment portfolio is subject to a variety of investment risks that could adversely affect its financial results. NSG’s results of operations depend, in part, on the performance of its investment portfolio, and its investments are subject to general economic conditions and market risks as well as risks inherent to specific securities. NSG’s primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. Should interest rates decline, a low interest rate environment would place pressure on NSG’s net investment income. Increases in interest rates could cause the values of NSG’s fixed income securities portfolios to decline, with the magnitude of the decline depending on the duration of securities included in its portfolio and the amount by which interest rates increase. During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of NSG’s securities if trading becomes less frequent or market data becomes less observable. In addition, in times of financial market disruption, certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data may become illiquid. In those cases, the valuation process includes inputs that are less observable and require more subjectivity and management judgment. If NSG is forced to sell certain of its investments during periods of market volatility or disruption, market prices may be lower than their carrying. This could result in realized losses, which could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. It could also affect financial ratios, bringing NSG out of compliance with its credit instruments and rating agency capital adequacy measures. NSG’s debt investments are subject to the risk that investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or due to deterioration in the financial condition of an insurer that guarantees the issuer’s payments. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturity securities (where rated) could also have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities. Mortgage loans are subject to a variety of risks relating to the supply and demand of leasable commercial space, creditworthiness of tenants and partners, capital markets volatility, interest rate fluctuations and issuer defaults, among others. NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition. NSG maintains reserves to cover its estimated exposure for claims relating to its issued insurance policies. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of exposure, but instead represent NSG’s best estimates using actuarial and statistical procedures. Reserve estimates are refined as experience develops. Because establishing reserves is an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of future losses, future developments may require NSG to increase policy benefit reserves, which would restrict its use of cash that might otherwise be used for other purposes, negatively affecting its results of operations, and limit the dividends and distributions that it is able to make to the Company. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements, and failure to meeting these requirements could subject it to regulatory action or other restrictions. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could result in regulatory action, prevent NSG from selling new business or require guarantees, all of which could have a material and adverse impact on NSG’s competitiveness, operational flexibility, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to satisfy these requirements could also preclude NSG from making dividends and distributions to the Company. A decline in NSG’s risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio could result in increased scrutiny by insurance regulators and rating agencies and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. The NAIC has established model regulations that provide minimum capitalization requirements based on RBC formulas for insurance companies. A failure to meet these requirements could subject NSG to increased scrutiny or corrective action imposed by insurance regulators, including limitations on its ability to write additional business, increased regulatory supervision, or seizure or liquidation. A decline in RBC ratio, whether or not it results in a failure to meet applicable RBC requirements, could limit NSG’s ability to make distributions, could result in a loss of customers or new business or result in a downgrade of NSG’s financial strength rating. Employees of NSG or its third-party service providers may take excessive risks which could negatively affect NSG’s financial condition and business. The individuals who conduct NSG’s business, including its management personnel, sales intermediaries, investment professions, and other employees, as well as employees of various third-party service providers, make decision that could expose NSG to risk. These include decisions such as setting underwriting guidelines and standards, product design and pricing, determining what assets to purchase for investment and when to sell them, which business opportunities to pursue, among other decisions. Such individuals may take excessive risks regardless of the structure of NSG’s risk management framework or its compensation program and practices, which may not effectively deter excessive risk-taking or misconduct. Similarly, NSG’s controls and procedures may not be effective. If NSG’s employees and the employees of third-party service providers take excessive risks, it could suffer material losses in its investment portfolio, be subject to regulatory sanctions and experience harm to its reputation. Difficult conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. The business and results of operations of domestic insurance companies generally are materially affected by conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally. An economic downturn may be characterized by increases in inflation, higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment or lower consumer spending. As a result, the demand for insurance products and their utilization could be adversely affected, as customers are unwilling or unable to purchase policies, choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop paying insurance premiums altogether, surrender their life insurance policies for their cash value or otherwise seek to utilize the cash benefits of their policies or file property and casualty claims at elevated rates. Depending on their level of occurrence, these customer actions could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. Climate change could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s business. Climate change could have a significant impact on longer-term natural weather trends, potentially impacting both NSG’s property and casualty insurance business and its life insurance business. Rising temperatures and changes in weather patterns could impact storm frequency and severity and thereby negatively affect claims experience, reinsurance costs and product pricing in NSG’s property and casualty insurance business. Climate change may also impact life expectancies, influencing mortality assumptions used in pricing and reserve calculations in its insurance business. Because of the unpredictability of the long-term effects of climate change, NSG may be unable to accurately factor these effects into its assumptions and models, and its business could suffer as a result. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to Life Insurance [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Life Insurance Actual claims and benefits payments may differ from actuarial assumptions and may adversely affect NSG’s financial results, capitalization and financial condition. Due to the nature of the underlying risks and the uncertainty associated with the determination of liabilities for future policy benefits and claims, NSG cannot precisely determine the amounts which it will ultimately pay to settle these liabilities. Because of the inability to determine with precision the amounts required to settle future policy benefits and claims, NSG must rely on actuarial assumptions. Liabilities for future policy benefits and claims are established based on actuarial estimates of how much NSG will need to pay for future benefits and claims. NSG’s earnings significantly depend upon the extent to which its actual claims experience and benefit payments on its products are consistent with such assumptions. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, including with respect to guaranteed options, but those assumptions may be incorrect. NSG makes assumptions regarding policyholder behavior at the time of pricing, including regarding the selection and utilization of the guaranteed options inherent within certain of its products. A material increase in the valuation of liabilities for future benefit payments could result to the extent that emerging and actual experience deviates from policyholder option utilization assumptions. These assumptions are based in part on expected persistency of the products, which change the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Persistency could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including adverse economic conditions, as well as by developments affecting policyholder perception of NSG and perceptions arising from any potential adverse publicity or negative rating agency actions. If NSG’s actual claims experience differs from the assumptions used to establish reserves for its liabilities, NSG may be required to increase its reserves. NSG evaluates its liabilities regularly based on accounting requirements (which change from time to time), the assumptions and models used to establish the liabilities, as well as actual experience. For example, amounts actually paid may vary materially from the estimated amounts, particularly when those payments may not occur until well into the future. To the extent that actual claims and benefits experience differs from the underlying assumptions used in establishing such liabilities, NSG could be required to increase its reserves for liabilities. An increase in reserves required for any of the above reasons, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations and its profitability measures, as well as materially impact its capitalization, statutory free cash flow and liquidity. This could impact NSG’s risk-based capital ratios and its financial strength ratings, which are necessary to support its product sales, and, in certain circumstances, ultimately impact its solvency. See also “NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition” below. Pricing accuracy depends on accurate morbidity and mortality estimates, but the data on which such estimates are based may be insufficient, incorrect or incomplete. In order to price products accurately, NSG must develop and apply appropriate morbidity and mortality estimates, closely monitor and timely recognize changes in trends, and project both severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy to cover these risks. Pricing adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to cover NSG’s cost of sales, costs of operations (including payment of policy benefits) and to earn a profit. Pricing adequacy is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation: availability of sufficient reliable data; incorrect or incomplete analysis of available data; uncertainties inherent in estimates and assumptions; selection and application of appropriate rating formulae or other pricing methodologies; adoption of successful pricing strategies; prediction of policyholder life expectancy and retention; unforeseen or unanticipated events, legislation, regulatory action or court decisions; and unexpected changes in interests rates or inflation. Such risks may result in NSG’s pricing being based on outdated, inadequate, or inaccurate data, or inappropriate analyses, assumptions, or methodologies, and may cause NSG to estimate incorrectly future changes in the frequency or severity of claims. As a result, NSG could underprice risks, which would negatively affect NSG’s margins, or it could overprice risks, which could reduce NSG’s volume and competitiveness. Public health crises, extreme mortality events or similar occurrences may adversely impact NSG’s business, financial condition, or results of operations. NSG’s life insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic mortality, such as a pandemic or other event that causes a large number of deaths, and the likelihood, timing and severity of such events cannot be predicted. Economic uncertainty resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could impact sales of certain of NSG’s products, and NSG may decide or otherwise be required to provide relief to customers adversely affected by such an event. In addition, the impact of climate change could cause changes in the frequency or severity of outbreaks of certain diseases. Circumstances resulting from a public health crisis or similar event could affect the incidence of claims, utilization of benefits, lapses or surrenders of policies and payments on insurance premiums, any of which could impact the revenues and expenses associated with NSG’s products. NSG cannot be certain that the liabilities it has established for claims arising from a catastrophe will be adequate to cover actual claim liabilities. Conversely, improvements in medical care and other developments which positively affect life expectancy can cause NSG’s assumptions with respect to longevity, which it uses when it prices its products, to become incorrect and, accordingly, can adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Liquidity may be adversely affected by policyholder withdrawals and surrenders or if holders of whole life policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater-than-anticipated levels. NSG’s insurance business is exposed to the risk of unanticipated or extraordinary early policyholder withdrawals or surrenders. Early withdrawal and surrender levels may differ from anticipated levels for a variety of reasons, including changes in economic conditions, changes in policyholder behavior or financial needs or increases in surrenders among policies that are no longer subject to surrender charges. In addition, NSG faces potential liquidity risks if policyholders with mature policies elect to receive lump sum distributions at greater levels than anticipated. If NSG experiences unanticipated early withdrawal or surrender activity or greater than expected lump sum distributions of endowment maturities and lacks sufficient cash flow from its insurance operations to support payment of these benefits, NSG may have to sell its investments in order to meet cash needs or be forced to obtain third-party financing. The availability of such financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market conditions, the availability of credit in general or more specifically in the insurance industry, the strength or weakness of the capital markets, NSG’s credit capacity, and the perception of NSG’s long- or short-term financial prospects. If NSG is forced to sell its investments on unfavorable terms or obtain financing with unfavorable terms, it could have an adverse effect on NSG’s liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. Changes in surrender activity may also result in remeasurement gains or losses which could increase volatility in NSG’s results of operations. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to Property & Casualty Insurance [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Property & Casualty Insurance If NSG is unable to accurately assess its underwriting risk, its financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. NSG’s underwriting success depends on its ability to accurately assess the risks associated with the business it writes and retains. NSG relies on the experience of its underwriting staff in assessing those risks, and on information provided by insureds or their representatives when underwriting insurance policies. While NSG may make inquiries to validate or supplement the information provided, it may make underwriting decisions based on incorrect or incomplete information. A misunderstanding of the nature or extent of the risks may cause NSG to fail to establish appropriate premium rates which could adversely affect its financial results. The usefulness of models as a tool to evaluate risk is subject to a high degree of uncertainty which could result in actual losses that are materially different from NSG’s estimates and could have a significant adverse impact on NSG’s financial results. NSG’s approach to risk management relies on subjective variables that entail significant uncertainties, and small changes in assumptions which depend heavily on judgment and foresight can have a significant impact on the modeled outputs. For example, NSG relies on catastrophe modeling results in its decision-making regarding the upper limits of its catastrophe reinsurance protection. These models simulate loss estimates based on a set of assumptions that impact loss potential, and may not produce accurate predictions. Models used to assess risk are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. These uncertainties can include, among other things, that they may not address all possible hazards, may not reflect the true frequency of events, may not accurately reflect a risk’s vulnerability or susceptibility to damage for a given event, may not accurately represent loss potential to insurance or reinsurance contract coverage limits and other contract terms and may not accurately reflect judicial, political or regulatory impacts. NSG’s losses and loss expense reserves may be inadequate to cover its actual losses, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows. NSG maintains losses and loss expense reserves based on its estimate of the ultimate payment of all claims that have been or could be incurred in the future, and the related costs of adjusting those claims. However, reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather an estimate of what NSG expects settlement and administration claims will cost, and its actual liability may be greater or less than the estimate. These variables are affected by both internal and external events that could increase NSG’s exposure to losses and there is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of loss reserves. Uncertainties may result from factors including, but not limited to, the emergence of new information after there has been time to appreciate the full extent of covered losses; new theories of liability that are enforced retroactively by courts; increases in the number and severity of claims; increases in costs (such as medical, legal or supply chain costs) to remedy covered losses; and the risk of unanticipated assessments from state underwriting associations or windstorm pools related to losses in excess of the associations or pool’s ability to pay. Unexpected changes in the interpretation of NSG’s coverage or provisions, including loss limitations and exclusions, in its policies could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurances that loss limitations or exclusions in NSG’s policies will be enforceable in the manner intended. As industry practices as well as legal, judicial, social, and other conditions change, unexpected and unintended issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. While these limitations and exclusions help NSG to assess and mitigate its loss exposure, it is possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void a limitation or exclusion, or that legislation could be enacted modifying or barring the use of such limitations or exclusions. In addition, court decisions could read policy exclusions narrowly so as to expand coverage. This could adversely affect NSG’s business by broadening coverage beyond its underwriting intent or by increasing the frequency or severity of claims, and could result in higher than anticipated losses. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until after insurance contracts are issued, and the full extent of liability under such contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could materially and adversely affect its business. Many factors could affect NSG’s ability to accurately and timely pay claims, including the training and experience of its claims representatives, the effectiveness of management, and its ability to develop or select and implement appropriate procedures and systems to support its claims functions, among other factors. NSG’s failure to accurately and timely pay claims could lead to regulatory action or litigation, undermine its reputation, and adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The property and casualty insurance business is historically cyclical in nature, which may affect NSG’s financial performance, cause its operating results to vary from quarter to quarter and may not be indicative of future performance. The supply of property and casualty insurance is related to prevailing prices, the level of insured losses and the level of capital available to the industry that, in turn, may fluctuate in response to changes in rates of return on investments being earned in the insurance industry. As a result, the property and casualty insurance business historically has been a cyclical industry characterized by periods of intense price competition due to excessive underwriting capacity as well as periods when shortages of capacity increased premium levels. In addition, demand for property and casualty insurance depends on numerous factors, including the frequency and severity of catastrophic events, levels of capacity, the introduction of new capital providers and general economic conditions. All of these factors fluctuate and may contribute to price declines in the insurance industry generally. As a result, NSG’s operating results are subject to fluctuation. If actual renewals do not meet expectations or if NSG chooses not to write renewals because of pricing conditions, its written premium in future years and its future operations would be materially adversely affected. |  |  |  |  |
Risks Related to the Insurance Business Generally [Member] |  |  |  |  |  |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |  |  |  |  |  |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to the Insurance Business Generally Competition for business in the insurance industry is intense. NSG faces competition from specialty insurance companies, standard insurance companies and underwriting agencies. Competition among insurance companies is based on a number of factors, including reputation, name recognition, credit ratings, financial strength ratings, relationships with distribution partners, terms and conditions of products offered, and speed of claims payment. In recent years, the insurance industry has undergone increasing consolidation, which may further increase competition. In addition, some of NSG’s competitors are larger and have greater financial, marketing, and other resources than NSG has, and are able to absorb large losses more easily. NSG’s competitors may also offer more competitive pricing, a broader range of products and have greater claims-paying ability. NSG may not be able to continue to compete successfully in the insurance markets. Increased competition in these markets could result in a change in the supply and demand for insurance, affect NSG’s ability to price its products at risk-adequate levels, and lead to reduced profitability or loss of market share. Because NSG’s business depends on insurance retail agents and brokers, NSG is exposed to certain risks arising out of its reliance on these distribution channels. NSG’s products are distributed through independent retail agents and brokers. Retail agents and brokers generally own the renewal rights, making NSG’s business model dependent on its relationships with, and the success of, the retail agents and brokers with whom it does business. NSG relies on a core number of brokers that account for a substantial number of policies, and its relationships with its brokers and retail agents may be discontinued at any time. If one or more such distributors were to terminate its relationship with NSG or reduce the amount of sales it produces, NSG’s results of operations could be adversely affected. Even if the relationships do continue, they may not be on terms that are profitable for NSG. A deterioration in the relationships with distributors or failure to provide competitive compensation could lead these distributors to place more premium with other carriers and less premium with NSG. Also, NSG’s distributors may in any event choose to concentrate their efforts in selling their firm’s own products or other competitors’ products instead of NSG’s products. NSG could also be adversely affected by consolidation in its distribution sales channels. Consolidation could result in loss of market access. NSG could also be negatively affected due to loss of talent as the people most knowledgeable about NSG’s products and with whom NSG has developed strong working relationships exit the business following an acquisition, or, increases in its commission costs as larger distributors acquire more negotiating leverage over their fees. Certain premiums from policyholders, where the business is produced by brokers, are collected directly by the brokers and remitted to NSG, and NSG could be adversely affected if the brokers collect premiums but do not remit them to NSG. Despite the premiums not being paid to NSG, NSG may be required under applicable law to provide the coverage set forth in the policy. Consequently, NSG assumes a degree of credit risk associated with the brokers with which it works. Similarly, if NSG is limited in its ability to cancel policies for non-payment, its underwriting profits may decline and its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Insurance companies are subject to extensive regulation, which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may change from time to time. NSG is subject to extensive regulation which may adversely affect its ability to achieve its business objectives, and noncompliance with these regulations could subject NSG to penalties, including fines and suspensions, which may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Applicable laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation, and changes in regulation could limit NSG’s discretion or make it more expensive to conduct business. In addition, state insurance regulators have broad discretion to deny or revoke licenses for various reasons, including the violation of regulations. In some instances, where there is uncertainty as to applicability, NSG follows practices based on its interpretations of regulations or practices that it believes generally to be followed by the industry which may turn out to be different from the interpretations of regulatory authorities. If NSG does not have the requisite licenses and approvals or does not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, state insurance regulators could preclude or temporarily suspend it from carrying on some or all of its activities in their state or could otherwise penalize NSG. This could adversely affect NSG’s ability to operate its business. Further, changes in the level of regulation of the insurance industry or changes in laws or regulations themselves or interpretations by regulatory authorities could interfere with NSG’s operations and require it to bear additional costs of compliance, which could adversely affect its ability to operate its business. Also, because its products are sold through independent agents, NSG has less control over how products are sold, including with respect to legal compliance. While NSG expects its agents to comply with their contractual obligations and applicable law, NSG has limited control over how such agents conduct their business. If violations are attributed to NSG, NSG could incur significant fines, and if attributed to its agents, may cause the agents to stop selling NSG’s products. NSG may be unable to purchase reinsurance in amounts desired on acceptable terms, and reinsurers may default or fail to perform. NSG purchases reinsurance from third parties to limit its risk on individual policies, and in the case of property insurance, limit its risk in the event of a catastrophe in various geographic areas (including, without limitation, the risk of hurricanes and tornado activity in the states in which it operates). If NSG is unable to renew expiring reinsurance contracts or enter into new reinsurance arrangements on acceptable terms, NSG’s loss exposure could increase, which would increase potential losses related to such loss events. If NSG is unwilling to bear an increase in loss exposure, it may need to reduce the level of its underwriting commitments which could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, reinsurers may exclude certain coverages from, or alter terms in, the reinsurance contracts NSG enters into with them. NSG, like other insurance companies, could write insurance policies which to some extent do not have the benefit of reinsurance protection, but these gaps in reinsurance protection expose NSG to greater risk and greater potential losses. Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to NSG to the extent the risk is transferred or ceded to the reinsurer, it does not relieve NSG (the ceding insurer) of its primary liability to policyholders. Reinsurers may not pay claims NSG incurs on a timely basis, or they may not pay some or all of these claims. Any disputes with reinsurers regarding coverage under reinsurance contracts could be time consuming, costly, and uncertain of success. In addition, NSG’s reinsurance may be concentrated among a few reinsurance carriers, meaning that if one or more of these reinsurers do not renew, default on payment of claims, or become insolvent, NSG could incur increased net losses and its financial condition could be adversely affected. A downgrade or potential downgrade in NSG’s financial strength rating could adversely affect its business. Participants in the insurance industry use ratings from independent ratings agencies as an important means of assessing the financial strength and quality of insurers. Downgrades in NSG’s financial strength rating could cause NSG’s partners to choose more highly rated competitors; increase the cost or reduce the availability of reinsurance; limit or prevent the ability to write or renew insurance contracts; limit access to capital markets; increase costs of capital; reduce new sales of insurance products; increase regulatory scrutiny; provide termination rights to reinsurers; require reduced pricing to remain competitive; and increase the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contract holders and policyholders, among other consequences. Performance of NSG’s investment portfolio is subject to a variety of investment risks that could adversely affect its financial results. NSG’s results of operations depend, in part, on the performance of its investment portfolio, and its investments are subject to general economic conditions and market risks as well as risks inherent to specific securities. NSG’s primary market risk exposures are to changes in interest rates and equity prices. Should interest rates decline, a low interest rate environment would place pressure on NSG’s net investment income. Increases in interest rates could cause the values of NSG’s fixed income securities portfolios to decline, with the magnitude of the decline depending on the duration of securities included in its portfolio and the amount by which interest rates increase. During periods of market disruption, including periods of significantly rising or high interest rates, rapidly widening credit spreads or illiquidity, it may be difficult to value certain of NSG’s securities if trading becomes less frequent or market data becomes less observable. In addition, in times of financial market disruption, certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data may become illiquid. In those cases, the valuation process includes inputs that are less observable and require more subjectivity and management judgment. If NSG is forced to sell certain of its investments during periods of market volatility or disruption, market prices may be lower than their carrying. This could result in realized losses, which could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s financial condition and results of operations. It could also affect financial ratios, bringing NSG out of compliance with its credit instruments and rating agency capital adequacy measures. NSG’s debt investments are subject to the risk that investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or due to deterioration in the financial condition of an insurer that guarantees the issuer’s payments. Downgrades in the credit ratings of fixed maturity securities (where rated) could also have a significant negative effect on the market valuation of such securities. Mortgage loans are subject to a variety of risks relating to the supply and demand of leasable commercial space, creditworthiness of tenants and partners, capital markets volatility, interest rate fluctuations and issuer defaults, among others. NSG’s actual claims losses may exceed reserves for claims and it may be required to establish additional reserves, which in turn may adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition. NSG maintains reserves to cover its estimated exposure for claims relating to its issued insurance policies. Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of exposure, but instead represent NSG’s best estimates using actuarial and statistical procedures. Reserve estimates are refined as experience develops. Because establishing reserves is an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of future losses, future developments may require NSG to increase policy benefit reserves, which would restrict its use of cash that might otherwise be used for other purposes, negatively affecting its results of operations, and limit the dividends and distributions that it is able to make to the Company. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements, and failure to meeting these requirements could subject it to regulatory action or other restrictions. NSG is subject to minimum capital and surplus requirements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could result in regulatory action, prevent NSG from selling new business or require guarantees, all of which could have a material and adverse impact on NSG’s competitiveness, operational flexibility, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to satisfy these requirements could also preclude NSG from making dividends and distributions to the Company. A decline in NSG’s risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio could result in increased scrutiny by insurance regulators and rating agencies and could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. The NAIC has established model regulations that provide minimum capitalization requirements based on RBC formulas for insurance companies. A failure to meet these requirements could subject NSG to increased scrutiny or corrective action imposed by insurance regulators, including limitations on its ability to write additional business, increased regulatory supervision, or seizure or liquidation. A decline in RBC ratio, whether or not it results in a failure to meet applicable RBC requirements, could limit NSG’s ability to make distributions, could result in a loss of customers or new business or result in a downgrade of NSG’s financial strength rating. Employees of NSG or its third-party service providers may take excessive risks which could negatively affect NSG’s financial condition and business. The individuals who conduct NSG’s business, including its management personnel, sales intermediaries, investment professions, and other employees, as well as employees of various third-party service providers, make decision that could expose NSG to risk. These include decisions such as setting underwriting guidelines and standards, product design and pricing, determining what assets to purchase for investment and when to sell them, which business opportunities to pursue, among other decisions. Such individuals may take excessive risks regardless of the structure of NSG’s risk management framework or its compensation program and practices, which may not effectively deter excessive risk-taking or misconduct. Similarly, NSG’s controls and procedures may not be effective. If NSG’s employees and the employees of third-party service providers take excessive risks, it could suffer material losses in its investment portfolio, be subject to regulatory sanctions and experience harm to its reputation. Difficult conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. The business and results of operations of domestic insurance companies generally are materially affected by conditions in the capital markets and the U.S. economy generally. An economic downturn may be characterized by increases in inflation, higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment or lower consumer spending. As a result, the demand for insurance products and their utilization could be adversely affected, as customers are unwilling or unable to purchase policies, choose to defer paying insurance premiums or stop paying insurance premiums altogether, surrender their life insurance policies for their cash value or otherwise seek to utilize the cash benefits of their policies or file property and casualty claims at elevated rates. Depending on their level of occurrence, these customer actions could materially adversely affect NSG’s business and results of operations. Climate change could have a material adverse effect on NSG’s business. Climate change could have a significant impact on longer-term natural weather trends, potentially impacting both NSG’s property and casualty insurance business and its life insurance business. Rising temperatures and changes in weather patterns could impact storm frequency and severity and thereby negatively affect claims experience, reinsurance costs and product pricing in NSG’s property and casualty insurance business. Climate change may also impact life expectancies, influencing mortality assumptions used in pricing and reserve calculations in its insurance business. Because of the unpredictability of the long-term effects of climate change, NSG may be unable to accurately factor these effects into its assumptions and models, and its business could suffer as a result. |  |  |  |  |

X
- References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8 + Details
Name: | cef_GeneralDescriptionOfRegistrantAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | cef_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8 -Subsection 3 -Paragraph a + Details
Name: | cef_RiskFactorsTableTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | cef_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8 -Subsection 3 -Paragraph a + Details
Name: | cef_RiskTextBlock
Namespace Prefix: | cef_
Data Type: | dtr-types:textBlockItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Boolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_AmendmentFlag
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Area code of city + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_CityAreaCode
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Cover page. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_CoverAbstract
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:stringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_DocumentType
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | dei:submissionTypeItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Address Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Address Line 2 such as Street or Suite number + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityAddressAddressLine2
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Name of the City or Town + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Code for the postal or zip code + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Name of the state or province. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | dei:stateOrProvinceItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition A unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2 + Details
Name: | dei_EntityCentralIndexKey
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | dei:centralIndexKeyItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Indicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2 + Details
Name: | dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Commission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_EntityFileNumber
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | dei:fileNumberItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition The exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2 + Details
Name: | dei_EntityRegistrantName
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Indicate 'Yes' or 'No' if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Is used on Form Type: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, 20-F, 6-K, 10-K/A, 10-Q/A, 20-F/A, 6-K/A, N-CSR, N-Q, N-1A. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230 -Section 405 + Details
Name: | dei_EntityWellKnownSeasonedIssuer
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | dei:yesNoItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Local phone number for entity. + References No definition available. + Details
Name: | dei_LocalPhoneNumber
Namespace Prefix: | dei_
Data Type: | xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | duration

X
- Definition Net asset value per share or per unit of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share. Includes, but is not limited to, by unit, membership interest, or other ownership interest. Investment includes, but is not limited to, investment in certain hedge funds, venture capital funds, private equity funds, real estate partnerships or funds. Excludes fair value disclosure. + References Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/exampleRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 830 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 55 -Paragraph 12 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147479168/946-830-55-12 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 210 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 45 -Paragraph 4 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147477796/946-210-45-4 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 205 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 7 -Subparagraph (a) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478494/946-205-50-7 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 205 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 7 -Subparagraph (h) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478494/946-205-50-7 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 505 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147478448/946-505-50-1 Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 210 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.6-04(19)) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147479170/946-210-S99-1 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Topic 946 -SubTopic 210 -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Section S99 -Paragraph 2 -Subparagraph (SX 210.6-05(4)) -Publisher FASB -URI https://asc.fasb.org/1943274/2147479170/946-210-S99-2 + Details
Name: | us-gaap_NetAssetValuePerShare
Namespace Prefix: | us-gaap_
Data Type: | dtr-types:perShareItemType
Balance Type: | na
Period Type: | instant

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RISKRELATINGTOOURBUSINESSANDSTRUCTUREMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToOurBusinessMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToOurInvestmentsMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToOurOperationsAsABDCAndARICMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatingToAnInvestmentInOurSecuritiesMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksOfTheInsuranceBusinessMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToLifeInsuranceMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToPropertyCasualtyInsuranceMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |

X
- Details
Name: | cef_RiskAxis=pfx_RisksRelatedToTheInsuranceBusinessGenerallyMember
Namespace Prefix: |
Data Type: | na
Balance Type: |
Period Type: |