XML 27 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) considered necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the results of its operations and comprehensive loss for the three months and nine months periods ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, and the cash flows for the nine months periods ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.

 

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported values of amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Policy Text Block]

Revenue

 

Revenue from Janssen Agreements

 

The Company recognizes revenues from its Janssen Agreements as follows.

 

The Company entered into its clinical manufacturing and clinical trial services arrangements in connection with its sale of certain intellectual property on December 30, 2019. These contracts commenced January 1, 2020. While these agreements are not considered contracts with a customer based on the terms thereof, we are applying the revenue recognition guidance by analogy.

 

XBiotech is still in the research and development phase; however, the eventual output of the Company’s intended ordinary activities will be the licensing of intellectual property and/or sale of commercialized compounds for use in pharmaceutical treatment of disease, not the performance of manufacturing of development stage compounds or clinical trials for others. Although Janssen is not a customer, as these services are not the output of XBiotech’s ordinary activities, the Company evaluated the terms of the agreements and has analogized to Accounting Standards Codification, Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) for clinical manufacturing and clinical trial services revenue recognition.

 

Under ASC 606, an entity recognizes revenue when (or as) its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606 (or for those analogized to it), the entity performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. We only apply the five-step model to contracts (including by analogy) when it is probable that we will collect the consideration we are entitled to in exchange for the goods or services we transfer to the counterparty. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of or analogized to ASC 606, we assess the goods or services promised within each contract and determine those that are performance obligations, and assess whether each promised good or service is distinct. We then recognize as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

 

Manufacturing Revenue

 

We have a Clinical Manufacturing Agreement that we account for by analogy to ASC 606, under which we agreed to manufacture bermekimab for use by Janssen in clinical trials, in exchange for payments of $4.5 million per quarter, paid in advance, for up to two years, though Janssen may terminate the contract for any reason with 60-days’ notice. Quantities are estimated for the two-year period, but are only binding on the Company and Janssen for the next four months of each period, other than by the 60-day notice termination. If, during any calendar quarter, the Company fails to deliver all of the Clinical Products ordered by Janssen, subject to our agreed upon capacity, the next quarter’s fee is reduced proportionately for the shortfall volume. Negative adjustments may also occur for delivered Clinical Products that do not meet quality specifications, though we expect to meet these standards.

 

We received payment of $4.5 million from Janssen based on billing schedules established in the contract on December 30, 2019 for manufacturing in each quarter of 2020. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Company failed to fully complete the manufacture of drugs specified for the March purchase order due to supply disruptions for the syringes used to hold the manufactured compound in the second quarter of 2020. We completed the manufacturing for this order in the third quarter of 2020.  In addition, due to the coronavirus pandemic, Janssen requested that we delay shipment of June volumes for which we had completed manufacturing. We recognized revenue for those volumes held at Janssen’s request, as they are segregated for future delivery. As of September 30, 2020, the Company had completed the manufacture of drugs specified for the September purchase order.

 

Clinical Trial Service Revenue

 

On December 30, 2019, we entered into a Transition Services Agreement with Janssen. Pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, the Company has agreed to continue operational management, on a fee-for-service basis, of two ongoing clinical trials related to bermekimab. The arrangement may continue as long as the clinical trials are ongoing; however, Janssen may terminate the contract at any time with 30 day notice.

 

The coronavirus pandemic had no material effect on our clinical trial services during the third quarter of 2020. However, the timelines for future clinical trial services could be extended in the future as a result of the pandemic, which could delay or otherwise adversely affect our revenue. Because our fees are directly related to third party costs of our vendors, our clinical trial service revenues in future periods are likely to be affected by our vendors’ ability to operate and the activities of trial candidates due to the effects of the pandemic and mitigating activities. Our first three quarter results may not be indicative of future revenues or costs associated with these clinical trials.

 

Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Research and Development Costs

 

All research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries and personnel-related costs, consulting fees, fees paid for contract clinical trial research services, the costs of laboratory consumables, equipment and facilities, license fees and other external costs. Costs incurred to acquire licenses for intellectual property to be used in research and development activities with no alternative future use are expensed as incurred as research and development costs.

 

Share-based Payment Arrangement [Policy Text Block]

Share-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for its share-based compensation awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statements of operations based on their grant date fair values. For stock options granted to employees and to members of the board of directors for their services on the board of directors, the Company estimates the grant date fair value of each option award using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock. To determine the fair value of its common stock, the Company uses the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported by NASDAQ. For awards subject to service-based vesting conditions, the Company recognizes share-based compensation expense, equal to the grant date fair value of stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis.

 

Share-based compensation expense recognized for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was included in the following line items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands).

 

 

  

Three Months Ended

  

Nine Months Ended

 
  

September 30,

  

September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 

Research and development

 $935  $386  $2,682  $972 

General and administrative

  1,870   411   5,887   881 

Cost of goods sold

  350   -   1,218   - 

Total share-based compensation expense

 $3,155  $797  $9,787  $1,853 

 

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions:

 

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2020 2019 

2020

  2019 

Dividend yield

  -   -   -   - 

Expected volatility

  87%  90%-91% 87%-91% 80%-91%

Risk-free interest rate

 0.33%-0.44% 1.59%-1.89% 0.33%-1.87% 1.59%-2.64%

Expected life (in years)

 5.38-6.25 5.38-6.25 5.38-10 5.38-10

Weighted-average grant date fair value per share

  12.46   5.66   12.05   5.14 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of cash on deposit in U.S., German, Swiss, Japanese and Canadian banks. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost which approximates fair value.

 

Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company holds these investments in highly-rated financial institutions, and limits the amounts of credit exposure to any one financial institution. These amounts at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any credit losses in such accounts and does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on these funds. The Company has no off-balance sheet concentrations of credit risk, such as foreign currency exchange contracts, option contracts or other hedging arrangements.

 

Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value Measurements

 

The consolidated financial statements include financial instruments for which the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts reflected on a historical cost basis. Financial instruments of the Company consist of cash deposits, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable, and certain accrued liabilities. These financial instruments are held at cost, which generally approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.

 

The Company follows ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which establishes a fair value hierarchy for those instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market date (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

 

 

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

 

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

 

At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate their fair values at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, due to their short-term nature.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment, which consists of land, construction in process, furniture and fixtures, computers and office equipment, scientific equipment, leasehold improvements, vehicles and building are stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, with the exception of land and construction in process which are not depreciated, using the straight line method. The useful lives are as follows:

 

 

Furniture and fixtures

7 years

    
 

Office equipment

5 years

    
 

Leasehold improvements

Shorter of asset’s useful life or remaining lease term

    
 

Scientific equipment

5 years

    
 

Vehicles

5 years

    
 

Mobile facility

27.5 years

    
 

Building

39 years

 

Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized; maintenance and repairs, which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets, are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the disposed asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized.

 

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for potential impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. Potential impairment is assessed when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. Recoverability of these assets is assessed based on undiscounted expected future cash flows from the assets, considering a number of factors, including past operating results, budgets and economic projections, market trends and product development cycles. If impairments are identified, assets are written down to their estimated fair value. The Company has not recognized any impairment through September 30, 2020.

 

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are recorded in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which provides for deferred taxes using an asset and liability approach. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. The Company determines its deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, which are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

The Company makes estimates and judgments in determining the need for a valuation allowance, including the estimation of its taxable income or loss for the three months and nine months ended September 30,2020. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings. The Company is uncertain about the timing and amount of any future earnings. Accordingly, the Company offsets certain deferred tax assets with a valuation allowance. The Company may in the future determine that certain deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not be realized, in which case the Company will reduce its valuation allowance in the period in which such determination is made. If the valuation allowance is reduced, the Company may recognize a benefit from income taxes in its statement of operations in that period.

 

ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements and provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions is to record such items as a component of tax expense.

 

Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block]

Foreign Currency Transactions

 

Certain transactions are denominated in a currency other than the Company’s functional currency of the U.S. dollar, and the Company generates assets and liabilities that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. At each balance sheet date, the Company adjusts the assets and liabilities to reflect the current exchange rate, resulting in a translation gain or loss. Transaction gains and losses are also realized upon a settlement of a foreign currency transaction in determining net loss for the period in which the transaction is settled.

 

Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, requires that all components of comprehensive income (loss), including net income (loss), be reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, including unrealized gains and losses on investments and foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Segment and Geographic Information

 

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company and the chief operating decision maker view the Company’s operations and manage its business as one operating segment. Substantially all of the Company’s operations are in the U.S. geographic segment.

 

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Net Loss Per Share

 

Net income/loss per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income/loss by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (if dilutive) during each period. The number of common share equivalents, which include stock options, is computed using the treasury stock method.

 

Subsequent Events, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Subsequent Events

 

The Company considered events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date but prior to the date the consolidated financial statements are available to be issued for potential recognition or disclosure in its consolidated financial statements. We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of filing this Form 10-Q.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance on financial instruments and related credit losses. The guidance requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The statement of comprehensive income reflects the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected credit losses during the period. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct write-down to the security. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and is applicable to the Company in fiscal 2020. The Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2020. The primary impact for the Company was the timing of recording expected credit losses on its trade receivables. The Company does not have a history of significant credit losses and this guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, which supersedes ASC 840, Leases, and requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 201801, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 201811, Targeted Improvements. Topic 842, as amended (the "new lease standard") establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement. The effective date of the new guidance is for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The FASB has approved an optional, alternative method to adopt the lease standard by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019, using the alternative method. The Company did not have a cumulative adjustment impacting retained earnings. Adoption of the lease standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The standard will become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted ASU 2019-12 during the quarter ended March 31, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 resulted in no material impact to the Company's financial statements.