EX-99.1 2 exhibit991may2018investo.htm EXHIBIT 99.1
May 2018 Investor Presentation May 2018

Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions or that include the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate” and other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and that do not relate to historical matters identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include statements about our business strategy, our industry, our future profitability, our expected capital expenditures and the impact of such expenditures on our performance, the costs of being a publicly traded corporation and our capital programs. A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe that we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (i) large or multiple customer defaults, including defaults resulting from actual or potential insolvencies, (ii) the level of production of crude oil, natural gas and other hydrocarbons and the resultant market prices of crude oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids and other hydrocarbons, (iii) changes in general economic and geopolitical conditions; (iv) competitive conditions in our industry, (v) changes in the long-term supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, (vi) actions taken by our customers, competitors and third-party operators, (vii) changes in the availability and cost of capital, (viii) our ability to successfully implement our business plan, (ix) our ability to complete growth projects on time and on budget, (x) the price and availability of debt and equity financing (including changes in interest rates), (xi) changes in our tax status, (xii) technological changes, (xiii) operating hazards, natural disasters, weather-related delays, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control, (xiv) the effects of existing and future laws and governmental regulations (or the interpretation thereof), (xv) failure to secure or maintain contracts with our largest customers or non-performance of any of those customers under the applicable contract, (xvi) the effects of future litigation, and such other factors discussed or referenced in the “Risk Factors” and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations“ sections of the Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, filed by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2018 and March 15, 2018, respectively. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Although forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs at the time they are made, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the factors described in the preceding paragraph, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You should also carefully consider the statements under the heading “Note About Forward-Looking Statements” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, unless required by law. In this presentation, assumptions were made with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters. Any estimates contained in these analyses – whether expressed or implied are based on estimates and are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth herein. The Company reserves the right to change any or all of the estimates included herein whether as a result of any changes in the above referenced information, market factors or otherwise. Industry and Market Data This presentation has been prepared by the Company and includes market data and other statistical information from third-party sources, including independent industry publications, or other published independent sources. Although the Company believes these third-party sources are reliable as of their respective dates, the Company has not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of this information. 1

Disclaimer (cont’d) Reserves Mineral resources and reserves are typically classified by confidence (reliability) levels based on the level of exploration, consistency and assurance of geologic knowledge of the deposit. This classification system considers different levels of geoscientific knowledge and varying degrees of technical and economic evaluation. Mineral reserves are derived from in situ resources through application of modifying factors, such as mining, analytical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors, relative to mining methods, processing techniques, economics and markets. In estimating our reserves, our independent reserve engineer does not classify a resource as a reserve unless that resource can be demonstrated to have reasonable certainty to be recovered economically in accordance with the modifying factors listed above. “Reserves” are defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Industry Guide 7 defines “proven (measured) reserves” as reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established. Industry Guide 7 defines “probable (indicated) reserves” as reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. Non-GAAP Information This presentation also contains information about the Company’s EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, production costs, and contribution margin, which are not measures derived in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and which exclude components that are important to understanding the Company’s financial performance. We define EBITDA as our net income, plus (i) depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization expense; (ii) income tax expense (benefit); (iii) interest expense and (iv) franchise taxes. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, plus (i) gain or loss on sale of fixed assets or discontinued operations, (ii) integration and transition costs associated with specified transactions, including our initial public offering, (iii) equity compensation, (iv) development costs, (v) non- recurring cash charges related to restructuring, retention and other similar actions, (vi) earnout and contingent consideration obligations, (vii) non-cash charges and unusual or non-recurring charges. We believe that our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA will provide useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. Net income is the GAAP measure most directly comparable to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives to net income presented in accordance with GAAP. Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility. Reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in the Appendix to this presentation. We also use production costs, which we define as costs of goods sold, excluding depreciation, depletion, accretion of asset retirement obligations and freight charges, to measure our financial performance. Freight charges consist of shipping costs and rail car rental and storage expenses. Shipping costs consist of railway transportation costs to deliver products to customers. Rail car rental and storage expenses are associated with our long-term rail car operating agreements with certain customers. We believe production costs is a meaningful measure to management and external users of our financial statements, such as investors and commercial banks, because it provides a measure of operating performance that is unaffected by historical cost basis. Cost of goods sold is the GAAP measure most directly comparable to production costs. Production costs should not be considered an alternative to cost of goods sold presented in accordance with GAAP. Because production costs may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definition of production costs may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility. A reconciliation of production costs to cost of goods sold, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in the Appendix to this presentation. We also use contribution margin, which we define as total revenues less costs of goods sold excluding depreciation, depletion and amortization, to measure our financial and operating performance. Contribution margin excludes other operating expenses and income, including costs not directly associated with the operations of our business such as accounting, human resources, information technology, legal, sales and other administrative activities. We believe contribution margin is a meaningful measure because it provides an operating and financial measure of our ability to generate margin in excess of our operating cost base. A reconciliation of contribution margin to gross profit, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in the Appendix to this presentation. 2

Key Investment Highlights Long-lived, Strong High-Quality Industry Reserve Base Fundamentals Focus on Logistics Safety and Advantage Environmental Stewardship Significant Strong Organic Balance Sheet Growth and Financial Potential Experienced Flexibility Management Team

Multi-Faceted Growth Strategy Maximize Significant Organic Growth Potential at Oakdale  Focus on increasing nameplate capacity to 5.5 million tons by the end of 2Q 2018  Strong O&G industry fundamentals driving organic growth Development of Future Expansion Opportunities  Hixton available for future development  Two locations under lease in the Permian that are available for future development Optimizing Logistics Infrastructure  Capitalize on dual-serve rail capabilities at Oakdale to potentially reduce transportation costs  Van Hook transload terminal in the Bakken, acquired in March 2018  Agreement to acquire Quickthree Solutions, a manufacturer of portable “last mile” vertical frac sand storage solutions at the wellsite, with an expected close at the end May 2018  Look to invest in opportunities to efficiently manage sand from the mine to wellhead - Additional in-basin delivery points Focusing on Cost Profile and Process Improvements  Low royalty rates and minimal yield loss due to quality of sand reserves drive lower operating costs  Continue to evaluate efficiency initiatives at Oakdale to reduce overall cost structure Maintaining Financial Strength and Flexibility  Access to capital markets and ample liquidity provides opportunity to pursue growth initiatives 4

Significant Organic Growth Potential Oakdale Expansion  Expanding to 5.5 million tons of annual nameplate capacity by the end of Q2 2018  Integrated plant design with new wet plant, for expanded capacity, and new dry plants enclosed for year-round processing Transloading Terminal (Van Hook, North Dakota)  Commenced operations in April 2018 Near-term  Signed long-term take-or-pay contract with an anchor customer at “in-basin” pricing Growth  $15.5 million paid consideration  Expected to result in incremental “in-basin” sales volumes “Last Mile” Solution  Anticipate acquiring Quickthree Solutions which will provide us with a portable silo solution for delivery of frac sand to the wellhead  Oakdale  Proven reserve of ~321 million tons provides significant ability to ramp annual production capacity at Oakdale up to ~9 million tons  Hixton  ~100 million tons of proven reserves  Fully permitted and readily available for future expansion Future Growth  Well positioned for rebound in Canadian and increased U.S drilling activity Potential  Permian Greenfield Mine Opportunities Under Evaluation to Provide Geographic Diversification of Mining Asset Base  Minimal upfront cost to acquire acreage  Low royalty rates  Potential rail access for delivery of Northern White into the Permian Basin and/or shipment of Permian sand out to other locations 5

Mining and Production

Northern White Operations Overview Smart Sand – Overview Reserve Locations Smart Sand - pure-play, low-cost producer of high- quality Northern White raw frac sand Oakdale, WI – 1,196 acres (Monroe County, WI)  The Company owns a Northern White raw frac sand mine, Hixton, WI – 959 acres 81% Finer Mesh Reserve processing facility and a multi-unit train rail logistics loadout on (Jackson County, WI) (40/70, 100 mesh) the Canadian Pacific rail network, a Class I rail line, near Oakdale, Wisconsin  The Company’s Byron location is a multi-unit train capable facility on a Class I rail line owned by Union Pacific, ~3.5 miles away from the Oakdale facility ~45 miles  The Company owns rights to operate a unit train capable between transloading terminal in Van Hook, North Dakota locations  The Company anticipates acquiring Quickthree Solutions, a Rail line Class I Rail Lines access to manufacturer of portable “last mile” vertical frac sand storage Canadian National all major solutions at the wellsite, in May 2018 Canadian Pacific basins  Smart Sand owns a second property available for future Union Pacific development in Hixton, Wisconsin Sand Reserve Overview (1) Significant Organic Growth Potential Hixton Oakdale Facility Hixton Site Proven 100% Nameplate Capacity Growth Potential (mm tons / year): 100mm tons 3.5 421mm Potential 9.0 Tons 2.2 Future Oakdale 5.5 Development Proven 100% 3.3 321mm tons Current Current Expected Oakdale Long-Term Nameplate Expansion Annual Expansion(2) Oakdale Capacity Nameplate Potential Potential Capacity as of Nameplate 2Q 2018 Capacity Source: Smart Sand Management, Company disclosures. (1) Reserves data as of December 31, 2017. (2) Further development and permitting at the Oakdale facility could ultimately allow for production of up to 9 million tons of raw frac sand per year. 7

Oakdale Facility: High Quality Northern White Raw Frac Sand – 2016 8

Oakdale Facility: High Quality Northern White Raw Frac Sand - Now Coulee C Mine 60/140 Winter Storage Pile 20/70 Winter Storage Pile Phase 2 Mine Mine Phase 1.5 Phase 1 Wet Plant Dry Plant 3 Mine Process Water Settling Pond Pond Dry Plant 1 Main office Dry Plant 2 Load Out 3 Mine Access Road Load Out 2 Rail Loop Load Out 1 West Processing Facility Bluff Phase 9

Byron Transload Crossing Truck Loadout Storm Water Pond Entrance Exit 10

Cost-Effective, Differentiated Process On-site Mining / Excavation Conveyer Belt to On-site Wet Plant Wet Plant Cleans and Sorts Product Dry Plant Dries and Sorts Product Unit Trains Deliver Dry Sand to Basin  Low Cost Structure Due to Several Key Attributes: − Low royalty rates ($0.50 per ton on 20/70 sand) − Higher mining yields due to balance of coarse and fine mineral reserve deposits − Minimal trucking required; reserves, processing plants, and rail facilities are centralized − FY2017 production costs of $13.61 per ton  Evaluating Other Initiatives to Reduce Mining and Operating Costs 11

West Texas Mine Options (Permian Basin)  4,219 acres under lease in Winkler and Crane counties in the Permian Basin  Total upfront consideration paid <$5 million  20 years leases with the option to renew for an additional 20 years  Low minimum royalty  Positions Smart Sand to be able to provide sand directly to customers in the Permian Basin in the future  Ability to access rail 12

Logistics

Expansive Logistics Capabilities Key Logistical Advantages Highly Competitive Delivery Capabilities  On-Site Rail – Eliminates significant trucking costs  Class I Rail Access – Location on Canadian Pacific rail line allows access to multiple high-growth oil and gas plays and avoids interchange fees on local short-hauls  Rail Design – Efficient rail design eliminates demurrage and optimizes load times  Unit Train Capability – Reduces customer product delivery time and costs (see below)  Dual Source Capability – Additional Union Pacific rail siding allows for opportunity to reduce freight costs by providing competition Manifest Route vs. Unit Train Route Benefits Manifest Route Unit Train Route Certain other Stop Stop Stop Basin Basin Competitors 1 2 3 Generally 14+ days Generally <5 days Increased landed cost and time Better utilization of railcars, predictable Unit Trains Require Approximately a Third of the Time of Manifest Trains and Significantly Improve Reliability 14

Van Hook Terminal  Location: Van Hook, ND  Commenced operations in April 2018  Signed long-term take-or-pay contract with an anchor customer at “in-basin” pricing  $15.5 million paid consideration  Evaluating options to increase capacity  Expected to result in incremental “in-basin” sales volumes Van Hook Terminal 15

Quickthree Solutions Acquisition Quickthree Solutions – Overview Quickstand Silo Line  Expected close at the end of May 2018  Manufacturer of portable “last mile” vertical frac sand storage solutions at the wellsite  Our goal is to provide a total service solution to deliver sand from mine to wellhead for our customers 16

Industry Overview

Industry Trends Driving Growth in Sand Demand U.S. New Well Drilling & Proppant Demand 30,000 180 160 25,000 140 20,000 120 100 rizontal Wells rizontal 15,000 80 10,000 60 40 5,000 20 New US Ho US New 0 - Tons of Proppant of Millions 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2019E 2020E New Horizontal Wells Proppant Demand (Mil Tons) Proppant Per Well Proppant / Well (Millions of pounds) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q3 17 Q4 17 Q1 18E Q2 18E Q3 18E Q4 18E Source: Spears and Associates Hydraulic Fracturing Market Report Q4 2017 and Supplement, Q1 2018. 18

Market Growth Potential More Wells Drilled … More Stages/Well … More Proppant/Foot … More Proppant/ Well … More Proppant Demand 2014 Average 2015 Average 2016 Average 2017 Average 2018E New Horizontal Rigs Drilled 24,622 16,492 9,275 17,619 19,975 Avg. Lateral Length/Well 6,801 ft. 6,883 ft. 7,088 ft. 7,133 ft. 7,347 ft. Pounds/Lateral Foot 869.3 lbs/ft 997.6 lbs/ft 1,187.6 lbs/ft 1,408.6 lbs/ft 1,627.8 lbs/ft Pounds/Well 5.8M lbs. 7.2M lbs. 9.3M lbs. 11.5M lbs. 14.2M lbs. Estimated Tons/Well 2,900 tons 3,600 tons 4,650 tons 5,750 tons 7,100 tons Total Proppant Demand 72.7M tons 59.7M tons 43.7M tons 102.6M tons 141.6M tons (1) Total Frac Sand Demand 65.5M tons 53.7M tons 39.3M tons 92.3M tons 127.4M tons Source: Spears and Associates Hydraulic Fracturing Market Report Q4 2017 and Supplement, Q1 2018 & company estimates. (1) Assumes that frac sand represents 90% of total proppant demand. 19

Growing Demand for Fine Sand Mesh Sizes Market Outlook for Fine Sand  Proppant size is characterized by mesh size  According to Kelrik LLC, a notable driver which is determined by sieving the proppant impacting demand for fine mesh sand is through mesh screens increased proppant loadings, specifically, larger − Historically, large mesh sizes used for oily / liquids volumes of proppant placed per frac stage rich formations  − Historically, smaller mesh sizes were used for natural Kelrik expects the trend of using larger volumes gas formations of finer mesh materials, such as 100 mesh sand  Generally, E&P companies have two methods to and 40/70 sand, to continue control well performance: increase frac  conductivity or reservoir contact area Due to innovations in completion techniques,  demand for finer grade sands has also shown a Due to smaller grain size, 100 mesh enhances considerable resurgence reservoir contact area − Used more prominently in oil wells with increasingly positive results  Focus on reservoir contact area has led to an increasing number of operators achieving better yields (higher production relative to optimized cost), increasing demand for 100 mesh 20

Financial Overview

Summary Financials Quarterly Sales Volumes Quarterly Revenue (thousands of tons) ($ in millions) $43.0 $42.6 706 723 $39.3 653 559 531 $29.8 $25.1 Q1'17A Q2'17A Q3'17A Q4'17A Q1'18A Q1'17A (1) Q2'17A (2) Q3'17A Q4'17A Q1'18A Quarterly Production Costs & Contribution Margin/Ton Quarterly Adjusted EBITDA ($ in millions) $ 22.44 $ 20.95 $11.6 $ 18.77 $ 17.82 $ 15.84 $8.9 $ 14.79 $ 14.27 $ 13.17 $ 12.49 $ 10.79 $6.5 $5.9 $3.7 Q1'17A Q2'17A Q3'17A Q4'17A Q1'18A Q1'17A(1) Q2'17A(2) Q3'17A Q4'17A Q1'18A Production Costs Contribution Margin (1) Includes monthly minimum / shortfall payments of $0.1 million for 2Q’17 (2) Includes monthly minimum / shortfall payments of $1.2 million for 3Q’17 22

Why Smart Sand?  Expanding Oakdale to 5.5 MM annual nameplate production capacity  Available capacity at Oakdale to capture near-term volume growth  Long-lived, high-quality reserve base to support existing operations High Quality as well as potential future expansions Core Asset Base  On-site multi-unit train rail access to Canadian Pacific and nearby at Oakdale access to Union Pacific (Class I)  Integrated mining, plant and rail facilities reduce costs  In-basin terminals and innovative “last mile” logistics Additional  Hixton available for future expansion Growth  Locations in the Permian available for future development  Significant balance sheet flexibility and liquidity Financial  Minimal debt Flexibility  Ability to use cash flow generation from Oakdale operations to support growth initiatives 23

Appendix

APPENDIX Committed to Highest Corporate Standards  Management maintains close dialogue with its customers regarding the oil and gas industry’s rigorous regulatory environment Legal &  ISO registered Quality System and Environmental Management System in Regulatory place  Minimal environmental and community impact: on-site rail, careful mine design, moderated trucking and extensive use of conveyors  A member of the Wisconsin Industrial Sand Association (WISA), a selective industry group promoting high standards for safety, Environmental sustainability and environmental performance  Participant in Wisconsin’s Green Tier program, demonstrating voluntary commitment to high environmental performance through projects that improve the environment and promote good community relations  Our first priority is a safe work environment. Dedicated safety staff, continual Safety training and daily inspections are part of our MSHA approved safety plan Smart Sand is committed to providing a safe working environment and upholding the highest levels of environmental stewardship 25

APPENDIX Income Statement For the Year ended Year ended Year ended Three months ended Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2017 Mar 31, 2018 ($ in millions) (audited) (audited) (audited) (unaudited) Revenues(1) $47.7 $59.2 $137.2 42.6 Cost of sales 21.0 26.6 100.3 35.4 Gross profit 26.7 32.7 36.9 7.2 Operating expenses Salaries, benefits and payroll taxes 5.1 7.4 8.2 2.6 Depreciation and amortization 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 Selling, general and administrative 4.7 4.5 9.5 3.1 Total operating expenses 10.1 12.3 18.2 5.9 Income from operations 16.6 20.4 18.7 1.4 Preferred stock interest expense (5.1) (5.6) – – Other interest expense (2.7) (2.9) (0.5) (0.1) Other income 0.4 8.9 0.5 – Total other expense (7.5) 0.4 0.0 (0.1) Loss on extinguishment of debt – (1.1) – – Income (loss) before income tax expense 9.1 19.7 18.7 1.2 Income tax expense (benefit) 4.1 9.4 (2.8) 0.2 Net income (loss) 5.0 10.3 21.5 1.0 Adjusted EBITDA 23.9 37.9 30.6 5.9 Capital expenditures 29.4 2.5 51.1 46.9 Sales volumes (tons) 750,675 826,414 2,449,227 723,219 (1) Includes monthly minimum / shortfall payments of $10.1 million for 2015, $20.9 million for 2016, $1.2 million for 2017 and $0 for 2018. 26

APPENDIX Balance Sheet As of Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2017 Mar 31, 2018 ($ in millions) (audited) (audited) (audited) (unaudited) Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $3.9 $47.5 $35.2 $2.6 Accounts receivable 6.0 5.7 24.6 27.9 Inventory – ST 4.2 10.3 9.1 5.3 Prepaid expenses and other assets 1.5 1.4 3.8 5.0 Total current assets 15.6 65.0 72.7 40.8 Noncurrent assets PP&E, net 108.9 104.1 172.2 210.0 Inventory – LT 8.0 3.2 – – Deferred financing cost, net 0.5 1.2 1.9 3.8 Total noncurrent assets 117.4 108.4 174.1 213.9 Total assets 133.1 173.5 246.8 254.6 Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses 4.9 4.1 33.7 24.1 Deferred revenue 7.1 1.6 – 0.9 Income tax payable – 7.1 – – Cap. lease & notes payable – current 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 Preferred stock liability – current 34.7 – – – Total current liabilities 48.6 13.7 34.6 25.7 Noncurrent liabilities Revolving credit facility, net 63.3 – – 15.6 Deferred tax liability 14.5 15.0 13.2 13.5 Asset retirement obligation 1.2 1.4 9.0 8.1 Cap. lease & notes payable – noncurrent 1.8 0.9 – – Preferred stock liability – noncurrent – – – – Total noncurrent liabilities 80.8 17.3 22.2 37.3 Total liabilities 129.4 31.0 56.8 63.0 Total stockholders' equity (deficit) 3.7 142.4 190.0 191.6 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 133.1 173.5 246.8 254.6 Note: Figures may not tie due to rounding. 27

APPENDIX Statement of Cash Flows For the Year ended Year ended Year ended Three months ended Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2017 Mar 31, 2018 ($ in millions) (audited) (audited) (audited) (unaudited) Operating activities Net income (loss) $5.0 $10.4 $21.5 $1.0 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation, depletion and amortization of asset element obligation 5.3 6.5 7.9 3.3 Asset retirement obligation – – – (1.2) (Gain) loss on disposal of assets 0.1 (0.1) 0.3 – Loss on derivatives 0.5 – – – Loss on adjustment of debt – 1.1 – – Revenue reserve (0.1) – – – Amortization of deferred financing cost 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.1 Accretion of debt discount 0.5 0.3 – 0.1 Deferred income taxes 3.7 0.5 (1.8) 0.3 Stock-based compensation, net 0.8 1.4 2.0 0.6 Non-cash interest expense on revolving credit facility 0.7 – – – Non-cash interest expense on Series A preferred stock 5.1 5.6 – – Changes in assets and liabilities Accounts and unbilled receivables 2.6 0.3 (18.8) (3.3) Inventories (2.5) (1.4) 4.4 3.8 Prepaid expenses and other assets 2.4 0.1 (3.4) (3.6) Deferred revenue 7.1 (5.5) (1.6) 0.9 Accounts payable (0.1) 0.8 9.4 (7.6) Accrued and other expenses (0.7) (0.5) 2.4 4.1 Income taxes payable – 7.0 (7.1) – Net cash provided by operating activities 30.7 26.7 15.6 (1.6) Investing activities: Purchase of property, plant and equipment (29.4) (2.5) (51.2) (46.9) Proceeds from disposal of assets – – 0.0 – Net cash used in investing activities (29.4) (2.5) (51.1) (46.9) Financing activities Repayment of line of credit – – – – Repayments of notes payable (0.5) (1.4) (0.3) – Payments under equipment financing obligators (0.4) (0.4) (0.4) (0.1) Payment of deferred financing and amendment costs (0.4) (1.2) (0.2) – Proceeds from revolving credit facility 12.8 1.1 – 16.0 Repayment of revolving credit facility (9.6) (65.3) - - Proceeds from equity issuance – 138.3 26.3 – Payment of equity transaction costs – (11.0) (2.1) – Repayment Series A preferred stock – (40.3) – – Purchase of treasury stock – (0.4) (0.1) (0.1) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1.8 19.4 23.2 15.9 Net (decrease) increase in cash 3.1 43.6 (12.3) (32.6) Cash at beginning of period 0.8 3.9 47.5 35.2 Cash at end of period 3.9 47.5 35.2 2.6 28

APPENDIX EBITDA Reconciliation Year ended December 31, ($ in thousands) 2015 2016 2017 Net income (loss) $4,990 $10,379 $21,526 Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization 5,318 6,445 7,300 Income tax (benefit) expense 4,129 9,394 (2,809) Interest expense 7,826 8,436 700 Franchise taxes 35 21 339 EBITDA $22,298 $34,675 $27,056 (Gain) Loss on sale of fixed assets (1) 39 (59) 253 Integration and transition costs – – 16 Initial public offering related costs (2) 221 725 – Equity compensation (3) 792 1,426 1,652 Development costs (4) 76 – 845 Cash charges related to restructuring and retention (5) – – 279 Non-cash charges (6) 469 21 514 Loss on extinguishment of debt (7) – 1,051 – Adjusted EBITDA $23,881 $37,839 $30,615 (1) Includes losses related to the sale and disposal of certain assets in property, plant and equipment. (2) For the year ended December 31, 2016, represents IPO-related bonuses. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred $725 and $221 of expenses related to previous IPO activities, respectively. (3) Represents the non-cash expenses for stock-based awards issued to our employees and employee stock purchase plan compensation expense. (4) Represents costs related to current development project activities. (5) Represents costs associated with the retention and relocation of employees. (6) Represents accretion of asset retirement obligations and loss on derivatives. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we incurred a loss of $5 and $445 related to a propane derivative contract, respectively. (7) Reflects the loss on extinguishment of debt related to our November 2016 financing transaction. 29

APPENDIX EBITDA Reconciliation Quarter ended ($ in thousands) 3/31/2017 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 3/31/2018 Net income (loss) $969 $2,624 $7,047 $10,886 $975 Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization 1,667 1,693 1,756 2,184 3,160 Income tax expense (benefit) 515 1,154 1,686 (6,165) 232 Interest expense 173 182 172 174 219 Franchise taxes 228 10 70 31 220 EBITDA $3,552 $5,663 $10,731 $7,110 $4,806 Gain (loss) on sale of fixed assets (1) (39) 194 30 66 – Integration and transition costs – – 16 – – Equity compensation (2) 176 585 516 495 490 Development costs (3) – – 79 766 328 Cash charges related to restructuring and retention (4) – – 239 40 94 Non-cash charges (5) 20 20 20 453 134 Adjusted EBITDA $3,709 $6,462 $11,631 $8,930 $5,852 (1) Includes losses related to the sale and disposal of certain assets in property, plant and equipment. (2) Represents the non-cash expenses for stock-based awards issued to our employees and employee stock purchase plan compensation expense. (3) Represents costs related to current development project activities. (4) Represents costs associated with the retention and relocation of employees. (5) Represents accretion of asset retirement obligations and loss on derivatives. 30

APPENDIX Production Cost Reconciliation Year ended December 31, ($ in thousands) 2015 2016 2017 Cost of goods sold $21,003 $26,569 $100,304 Depreciation, depletion, and accretion of asset retirment obligations (4,930) (6,076) (7,289) Freight charges (1) (6,186) (7,924) (59,684) Production costs $9,887 $12,569 $33,331 Production costs per ton $13.47 $15.22 $13.61 Quarter ended ($ in thousands) 3/31/2017 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/30/2017 3/31/2018 Cost of goods sold $19,662 $21,407 $26,297 $32,938 $35,413 Depreciation, depletion, and accretion of asset retirment obligations (1,579) (1,588) (1,628) (2,490) (3,106) Freight charges (1) (9,228) (12,824) (17,624) (20,009) (17,158) Production costs $8,855 $6,995 $7,045 $10,439 $15,149 Production costs per ton $15.84 $13.17 $10.79 $14.79 $20.95 (1) Certain costs in 2016 and 2015 were reclassified to freight charges to conform to the current financial statement presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on previous reported cost of goods sold. 31

APPENDIX Contribution Margin Reconciliation Quarter ended ($ in thousands) 3/31/2017 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/30/2017 3/31/2018 Revenue $25,059 $29,787 $39,329 $43,037 $42,628 Cost of goods sold 19,662 21,407 26,297 32,938 35,413 Gross profit 5,397 8,380 13,032 10,099 7,215 Depreciation, depletion, and accretion of asset retirment obligations 1,579 1,588 1,628 2,490 3,106 Contribution margin $6,976 $9,968 $14,660 $12,589 $10,321 Contribution margin per ton $12.49 $18.77 $22.44 $17.82 $14.27 32