XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Note 8 - Net Income (Loss) Per Share
9 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Earnings Per Share [Text Block]
(8)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
 
Basic net income (loss) per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the net income (loss) of the Company.
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the net income (loss) per share computations for the periods presented:
 
 
 
Three months ended
 
 
Nine months ended
 
 
 
July 31,
 
 
July 31,
 
 
 
2016
 
 
2015
 
 
2016
 
 
2015
 
Net income (loss) attributable to OCC (numerator)
  $ 188,163     $ (572,572 )   $ (2,539,980 )   $ (1,290,899 )
                                 
Shares (denominator)
    7,115,389       6,210,454       6,403,352       6,232,973  
                                 
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
  $ 0.03     $ (0.09 )   $ (0.40 )   $ (0.21 )
 
 
 
Weighted average unvested shares for the nine months ended July 31, 2016 totaling 681,570, while issued and outstanding, were not included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the nine months ended July 31, 2016 (because to include such shares would have been antidilutive, or in other words, to do so would have reduced the net loss per share for those periods).
 
Weighted average unvested shares for the three months and nine months ended July 31, 2015 totaling 872,598 and 677,955, respectively, while issued and outstanding, were not included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the three months and nine months ended July 31, 2015 (because to include such shares would have been antidilutive, or in other words, to do so would have reduced the net loss per share for those periods).