EX-99 3 infost2.htm

Exhibit 99.1

Dear Shareholder:

I am pleased to inform you that the Board of Directors of Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown") has approved a plan to spin-off its interest in Solitario Resources Corporation ("Solitario"), to the shareholders of Crown. Solitario's common stock currently trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol SLR.

The spin-off will allow the shareholders of Crown to directly participate in the value of our exploration properties in South America. Crown has announced that it has entered into a Merger Agreement with Kinross Gold Corporation and we anticipate that Solitario's Management Agreement with Crown will terminate if the transaction, as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, is completed. Solitario would then become a completely independent company.

If you are a holder of Crown's common stock at the close of business on **, the Record Date for the spin-off, you will receive approximately ** shares of Solitario common stock for every share of Crown common stock that you own on the Record Date. The final number of shares you receive will be determined on the Record Date. For more information on the share computation, see "The Spin-off" in the information statement. You will not be required to pay anything for the new shares or surrender any shares of Crown common stock.

The enclosed information statement describes the spin-off of the Solitario shares from Crown and contains important financial and other information about Solitario. Please read it carefully. If you have any questions regarding the spin-off, please contact James R. Maronick, Chief Financial Officer, or Christopher E. Herald, Chief Executive Officer, at 4251 Kipling Street, Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, (303) 534-1030.

Sincerely,

/s/ Christopher E. Herald

Christopher E. Herald

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Crown Resources Corporation

INFORMATION STATEMENT

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

DISTRIBUTION OF UP TO 9,633,585 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

This information statement is being furnished in connection with the spin-off by Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown"), to holders of its common stock of up to 9,633,585 shares of common stock of Solitario Resources Corporation ("Solitario"), representing approximately 37.5% of the total outstanding shares of Solitario and all of Crown's interest in Solitario.

If you are a holder of Crown's common stock at the close of business on ** (the "Record Date") for the spin-off, you will receive approximately ** shares of Solitario common stock for every share of Crown common stock that you own on the Record Date. The final number of shares you receive will be determined on the Record Date. For more information on the share computation, see The Spin-Off in the information statement.

A stockholder vote is not required for the spin-off to occur, and stockholders have no appraisal rights in connection with the distribution. WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR A PROXY AND YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY. To receive the shares of Solitario common stock to which you are entitled, you do not need to pay any cash or other consideration to Crown or to Solitario. You do not need to surrender any shares of Crown common stock that you own, and the number of shares of Crown that you currently own will not change as a result of the spin-off.

In reviewing this statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption "Risk Factors" beginning on page **.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

If you have any questions regarding the spin-off, please contact James R. Maronick, Chief Financial Officer, or Christopher E. Herald, Chief Executive Officer, at 4251 Kipling Street, Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, (303) 534-1030.

The date of this information statement is April *, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY | 4
RISK FACTORS | 11
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS | 15
THE SPIN-OFF | 16
CAPITALIZATION | 15
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK | 19
DIVIDEND POLICY | 20
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA | 21
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 24
BUSINESS | 37
MANAGEMENT OF SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION | 56
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS | 60
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK | 63
INDEX TO SOLITARIO RESOURCE CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | F-1

SUMMARY

In addition to this summary, you should read the entire information statement carefully, as well as those additional documents to which we refer you. Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this Information Statement to dollars are to US dollars.

The Company

Solitario was incorporated under the laws of the state of Colorado on November 15, 1984, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Resource Corp. of Colorado, ("CRCC") which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown. Prior to 1993, we had no activity. As of March 31, 2004 we have 25,700,142 shares outstanding, of these, CRCC owns 9,633,585 shares or approximately 37.5%. Prior to October 2000 CRCC owned 57.3% of our outstanding shares. In October 2000 we completed a plan of arrangement (the "Plan of Arrangement") whereby we issued 6,228,894 shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Altoro Gold Corp. ("Altoro") in exchange for 100% of the outstanding shares of Altoro. On November 4, 2003, we completed a private placement to certain Canadian based funds managed by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario of 1,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$1.20 per share for total proceeds of Cdn$1,800,000 or approximately $1,310,000, net of offering costs. Primarily as a result of the issuance of shares in connection with the Plan of Arrangement and the private placement, CRCC's ownership of our shares was reduced from 57.3% (immediately prior to the Plan of Arrangement) to 37.5% as of March 31, 2004.

Our corporate structure is as follows [jurisdiction of incorporation] - ownership percentage.

Solitario Resources Corporation [Colorado]

- Altoro Gold Corp. [British Columbia, Canada] - 100%

- Altoro Gold (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%

- Minera Altoro (BVI) Ltd. [British Virgin Islands]- 100%

- Minera Andes (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] -100%

- Compania Minera Andes del Sur S.A. [Bolivia] - 100%

- Minera Altoro Brazil (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%

- Altoro Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] - 100%

- Minera Solitario Peru, S.A. [Peru] - 100%

- Minera Bongará, S.A. [Peru] - 100%

- Minera Soloco, S.A. [Peru] - 100%

Mineral interests - General

We have been involved in the exploration for minerals in South America, focusing on precious and base metals, including gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper, lead and zinc. We have held concessions in Peru since 1993, in Argentina from 1993 to 1998, and in Bolivia and Brazil since 2000. Our primary focus is on the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties both on our own and through joint ventures with others, from initial discovery through advanced exploration. In February of 2004, we acquired an interest in a mineral property in the State of Nevada (see CC Project below).

Pedra Branca Project (Brazil-Platinum and Palladium)

We acquired concessions as a result of the acquisition of Altoro covering 69,244 hectares comprising the Pedra Branca platinum-palladium property in Brazil. Approximately 10,000 hectares of the property are subject to an underlying 2% net smelter return royalty to Eldorado Gold Corp. ("Eldorado") of Vancouver, British Columbia. On January 28, 2003 we entered into an agreement with Anglo American Platinum Corporation, Ltd. ("Anglo Platinum") whereby Anglo Platinum may earn a 51% interest in the property by spending $7 million on exploration at Pedra Branca over a four-year period. Anglo Platinum agreed to a minimum expenditure of $500,000 during the first six months of the agreement. Anglo Platinum can earn an additional 9% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 60%) by completing a bankable feasibility study. Anglo Platinum can also earn an additional 5% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 65%) by arranging for financing to put the project into commercial production. Payment of the 2% net smelter return royalty due Eldorado would be shared pro rata between Solitario and Anglo Platinum should production commence on that part of the property subject to the royalty.

Anglo Platinum has met its minimum required expenditure for the first six months and is currently reviewing the results of the first six month (Phase one) exploration program, before making a decision to fund the second phase of the Pedra Branca Project exploration program. Anglo has not yet made a decision on proceeding with the second phase of the exploration program. If Anglo Platinum declines to continue, Solitario will retain 100% of the Pedra Branca Project.

Triunfo Project (Bolivia-Gold, Silver, Lead and Zinc)

In August 2003, we signed an agreement (the "Option Agreement") to acquire a 100% interest in the Triunfo gold-silver-lead-zinc property in west-central Bolivia. The property is an early-staged exploration property that hosts a large mineralized area extending for at least 800 meters in length and up to 200 meters in width. Terms of the Option Agreement call for escalating payments totaling $185,000 over a four-year period to the underlying owners. The first payment of $10,000 has been made. A 100% interest in the property can be acquired at any time within a five-year timeframe for a one-time payment of $1.0 million. Solitario plans to spend a minimum of $100,000 during the first year as part of its five-year, $2.3 million work commitment.

Bongará Project (Peru-Zinc and Lead)

We hold concessions on the Bongará zinc-lead project in Peru covering approximately 6,000 hectares. The Bongará concessions are 100% owned by Solitario. The concessions were held in a joint venture through January 2001 with Cominco, Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia ("Cominco"). The Bongará project is considered an advanced-stage exploration project as a considerable amount of core drilling has been completed during the past seven years.

Yanacocha Royalty Property (Peru-Gold)

We held concessions covering approximately 61,000 hectares on the Yanacocha property in Peru until April 2000. In April of 2000 we completed an agreement with Newmont Peru, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (both companies referred to as "Newmont"), whereby we sold our Yanacocha Property to Newmont for $6,000,000 and a sliding scale net smelter return royalty that varies from two to five percent, depending on the price of gold. Newmont has not reported reserves on our royalty property and we have not received any royalty income from Newmont.

La Pampa, Sapalache and La Tola Projects (Peru-Gold)

The La Pampa concessions in Peru totaling 3,400 hectares were acquired in 1999 and 2003. In August 2002, we entered into a letter agreement with Bear Creek Mining Company of Tucson, Arizona ("Bear Creek") whereby Bear Creek can earn a 51% interest in the La Pampa project by spending $4.5 million over a five-year period. Bear Creek may earn an additional 14% (for a total of 65%) after the initial earn-in by completing a bankable feasibility study. Bear Creek has conducted surface sampling and trenching in 2003 and completed a 1,000-meter core drilling program in early 2004. In February 2004, Bear Creek notified us that it intends to terminate its option on the La Pampa project. We will review Bear Creek's technical data to determine our future plan for this project. Solitario has no capitalized mineral interest costs related to La Pampa at December 31, 2003.

The Sapalache concessions totaling 1,800 hectares were acquired 1997. The project was previously under joint venture to AngloGold, Ltd., of Peru ("AngloGold"). Anglo Gold, after conducting exploration, elected to drop out of the joint venture in 2000. We currently own a 100% interest in the project without any underlying owners or royalties, but are searching for a joint venture partner for this project.

In October 2003 and January 2004, we acquired the La Tola concessions totaling 12,000 hectares. The gold project is located in southern Peru and we own a 100%-interest in the concessions without any underlying owners or royalties. To date only surface sampling of rock outcrops has been conducted. If the results of the sampling program are favorable, a core-drilling program is planned for 2004. In April 2004 we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru, Ltd. on the La Tola Project as discussed further below.

San Pablo Project

In February 2004 we signed an option agreement (the "San Pablo Agreement") to acquire a 100% interest, with no retained royalty, in the 700-hectare San Pablo gold project in southwestern Bolivia. The San Pablo Agreement calls for Solitario to make escalating payments to the underlying private Bolivian owners of the property totaling $1.0 million and spend $190,000 on exploration over a four-year period. The first six-month payment of $10,000 has been made. After spending $15,000 during the first six-month period, we can terminate the San Pablo Agreement at anytime with no further obligations. The project is considered an early-stage exploration project. To date, we have performed only a limited project review consisting of geochemical sampling to confirm the presence of gold mineralization. Solitario has applied for an additional 6,100 hectares of mineral rights (not subject to the San Pablo Agreement) from the Bolivian government. We plan to conduct an extensive rock-sampling program over the next six months to determine the extent of gold mineralization. Pending the results of this program, Solitario will decide whether to seek a joint venture partner or independently fund further exploration.

CC Project

In February 2004 we signed an option agreement (the "CC Agreement") to acquire a 100%, interest in 88 unpatented claims totaling approximately 700-hectares on the CC gold project in west-central Nevada (U.S.). The CC Agreement calls for Solitario to make escalating payments to the underlying private owner of the project totaling $2.0 million over a five-year period and spend $900,000 over the first four years. The first year's payment of $25,000 has been made. We are committed to spend at least $150,000 on exploration during the first year. The underlying owner is entitled to retain up to a 3% net smelter return royalty on the project. We may reduce the underlying owner's royalty to 1% by paying $2.0 million to the owner at any time during the first eight years of the CC Agreement. After spending $150,000 during the first six-month period, we can terminate the Agreement at anytime with no further obligations. The project is considered an early-stage exploration project, although 13 drill holes were completed on the project two years ago. We plan to drill approximately 15 drill holes during 2004. To date, we have performed a limited review of the data and an on-site review of the surface geology.

Strategy

We have historically explored for mineral deposits through the location, purchase, lease or joint venture of early-stage exploration prospects. We have focused our efforts on precious metal prospects including gold, silver and platinum-group metals. In addition we have explored and acquired base-metal prospects including lead, zinc and copper. We intend to continue this focus.

Upon acquiring an exploration property, we typically perform geologic evaluation and exploration efforts to determine if the project warrants further work including, but not limited to geologic mapping and sampling, geophysical surveys, trenching, and drilling. If the results of this work indicate there is little or no geologic or mineral potential, the prospect is dropped and/or returned to its owner(s). However if we believe the project warrants additional work, we either look to joint venture or sell the project to a larger mining company with more appropriate resources, both technical and financial, to further develop and or operate the property. We also may choose to further advance the property independently through additional work that usually includes detailed exploration drilling. We also evaluate more advanced projects that other companies or individuals control. If our evaluation for this type of property is favorable, in exchange for ownership or majority control of a property we may either commit to spending significant amounts of capital on exploration or make purchase or option payments to the underlying owner(s).

We are an exploration stage company. Our focus is to evaluate, acquire and explore exploration stage mineral interests. We have no reported mineral reserves. Any future mineral reserves will only come from extensive additional exploration and engineering and evaluation of existing or future mineral interests. There can be no assurance that we will report mineral reserves in the future.

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described under "Risk Factors" below, as well as the other information contained in this information statement. These risks include, but are not limited to, changing regulatory requirements in the countries that we operate in, political and economic uncertainty, market risks and financing risks. In addition, as we pursue additional growth opportunities, we will be competing with many companies larger than ours and with greater financial and technical resources. If one or more of these consequences occur, it could negatively impact our ability to successfully implement our business strategy.

Recent Developments

On April 2, 2004, we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru Limited, ("Newmont"), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, whereby Newmont can earn a 51% interest in our 100%-owned La Tola gold property in southern Peru by spending US$7.0 million on exploration and development work over a four-year period. Newmont can earn an additional 14% interest (to a total interest of 65%) by completing a positive feasibility study and arranging 100% of project financing. In addition to our retained participating interest in the project, Solitario retains a sliding scale net smelter return royalty interest on gold and silver production (zero to 2.25% subject to gold price and other conditions) from the property.

On November 4, 2003, we completed a private placement to certain Canadian based funds managed by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario of 1,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$1.20 per share for total proceeds of Cdn$1,800,000 or approximately $1,310,000 (net of offering costs). The additional shares significantly contributed to the reduction in Crown's interest in us from 41.2% at September 30, 2003 to 37.5% at March 31, 2004.

On November 20, 2003, Crown and Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross") announced that the two companies have executed an Acquisition Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") whereby Kinross will acquire Crown and its 100%-owned Buckhorn Mountain gold deposit located in north central Washington State, USA, approximately 67 kilometers (42 miles) by road from Kinross' Kettle River gold milling facility. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of Crown will receive 0.2911 shares of Kinross for each share of Crown. The transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subject to regulatory approvals, a minimum two-thirds approval at a special meeting of Crown shareholders and customary closing conditions. It is the intent of Crown that the spin-off of the Solitario shares will take place prior to the completion of the acquisition by Kinross.

On November 8, 2003 Crown announced that it would be distributing (through CRCC) its holdings of 9,633,585 shares of our common stock. When Solitario sold shares in a Canadian public offering in 1994, the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") required that the issued and outstanding shares of Solitario held by CRCC be held in escrow (the "Escrow Agreement") to, among other things, prevent CRCC from selling too large a volume of Solitario shares shortly after the public offering. Over the next three years sixty percent of the shares held in escrow were released to CRCC pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. On December 29, 2003, as required by the TSX, our disinterested shareholders (which excluded holders who are our officers or directors and Crown) voted to approve the release of the remaining 3,140,162 shares of Solitario held in escrow. The shares were released from escrow on January 15, 2004. This will enable Crown (through CRCC) to distribute all of the 9,633,585 shares of our common stock other than shares not distributed as fractional shares and therefore retained by Crown, which is estimated to be less than 1,000 shares in total. Crown will not be giving its shareholders any consideration for fractional shares.

In October of 2001, we invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes (the "Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 of the $3,600,000 Senior Notes issued by Crown in a private placement. The terms of the Senior Notes were the same for all investors. In connection with the investment in the Senior Notes, we also received warrants to acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock at prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. On February 21, 2003 we invested in 10% series B convertible subordinated notes due 2006 (the "Subordinated B Notes") totaling $400,000 of the $2,700,000 Subordinated B Notes issued by Crown in a private placement. The terms of the Subordinated B Notes were the same for all investors. On November 5, 2003 our Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 533,333 shares of Crown common stock. The conversion was in accordance with the terms of the Subordinated B Notes, which allowed for an automatic conversion if Crown's common stock traded above $1.75 per share for twenty consecutive trading days. As of March 31, 2004 we owned 965,491 shares of Crown common stock, from the conversion of the Subordinated B Notes and received as interest on our Senior Notes and Subordinated B Notes. For more information about these transactions see the section titled "Related Party Transactions" below.

Assuming the completion of the exchange of shares as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, all of Crown's remaining convertible debentures are converted, all of Crown's options are exercised and all of Crown's warrants are exercised on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share, we estimate we would own approximately 6,144,885 shares of Crown, which would convert into approximately 1,788,776 shares of Kinross. The Kinross shares would be valued at approximately $13.1 million, assuming the March 31, 2004 market price of $7.33 per share for each Kinross share. See The Spin-Off - Mechanics of the Spin-Off below.

Executive Offices

Our principal executive offices are located at 4251 Kipling Street, Suite 390, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033. Our telephone number at that address is (303) 534-1030.

Summary Financial Information

The following table sets forth our summary consolidated historical financial information that has been derived from (i) the audited consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for our business for each of the three years ended December 31, 2003. You should read this information in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our historical consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this information statement. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of our future results.

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
(in thousands except per share amounts) | For the year ended December 31,
| 2003 | 2002 (1) | 2001 (1)
Costs, expenses and other: |  |  |
Exploration expense | $ 418 | $ 957 | $ 1,477
Depreciation and amortization | 488 | 504 | 49
General and administrative | 404 | 372 | 511
Management fees (2) | 351 | 449 | 590
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments | (5,438) | (105) | 63
Asset write-downs | - | - | 1,274
Loss on sale of assets | 26 | 39 | -
Interest and other (net) | (272 ) | (137 ) | (231 )
Income (loss) before income taxes | 4,023 | (2,079) | (3,733)
Income tax expense | 669 | - | -
Net income (loss) | $3,354 | $(2,079) | $(3,733)
Earnings (loss) per common share: Basic Diluted | $ 0.14 $ 0.14 | $(0.09) $(0.09) | $(0.16) $(0.16)
Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic Diluted | 23,638 23,638 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,387 23,387

BALANCE SHEET DATA: | As of December 31, 2003 | As of December 31, 2002 (1)
(in thousands) |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 1,273 | $1,405
Working capital (3) | $ 3,915 | $1,853
Total assets | $13,288 | $6,376
Total debt | $ - | $ -
Stockholders' equity | $11,934 | $6,277

(1) As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 have been restated to reflect mineral interests as intangible assets, to provide for amortization of those interests, to recognize gain and loss on derivative instruments and to record exploration expense for certain previously capitalized annual concession costs.

(2) Pursuant to a management and technical services agreement (the "Management Agreement"), as modified, between Crown and us, we have reimbursed Crown for direct out-of-pocket expenses; payment of 25% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for executive and technical salaries benefits and expenses, 50% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for financial management and reporting salaries, benefits and expenses and 75% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for investor relations salaries, benefits and expenses. These allocations are based upon estimated time and expenses spent by Crown management and employees on Crown activities and our activities. Management believes the allocations are reasonable and the allocations are periodically reviewed by management and approved by independent Board members of both Crown and us. Upon the spin-off of our shares and upon the completion of the merger between Crown and Kinross, we anticipate the Management Agreement will be terminated, and the above noted costs will be paid directly by us from that date forward. These costs will result in an increase in general and administrative costs related to salaries and benefits for employees, rent, audit and legal fees, shareholder relations costs, travel and office expenses. Under the Management Agreement, these costs have been shared by Crown and included in the management fees. We have estimated that general and administrative costs, on a pro forma basis, would have increased by approximately $785,000, $675,000 and $758,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. This increase in costs would have been partially offset, on a pro forma basis, by a reduction in management fees of $351,000, $449,000 and $590,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown. See "Management of Solitario Resources Corporation" for further discussion.

(3) Working capital consists of current assets less current liabilities.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to considering the other information in this Information Statement, you should consider carefully the following factors. The risks described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial may also adversely affect our business. We have attempted to identify the major factors under this heading that could cause differences between actual and planned or expected results, and we have included all material risk factors.

Our mineral exploration activities involve a high degree of risk; unless we find a commercially viable deposit on our projects, the money spent on exploration may never be recovered and we could incur a write down on our investments in our projects.

The exploration for mineral deposits involves significant financial and other risks over an extended period of time. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses are required to establish reserves by drilling and determining the feasibility of a project. It is impossible to ensure that the current or proposed exploration programs on properties in which we have an interest will be commercially viable. Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are the particular attributes of the deposit, such as its size and grade, costs and efficiency of the recovery methods that can be employed, proximity to infrastructure, financing costs and governmental regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, infrastructure, land use, importing and exporting of gold, and environmental protection.

Even if our exploration activities determine that a project is commercially viable, it is impossible to ensure that such determination will result in a profitable sale of the project or, whether developed by a joint venture or on our own in the future, that such project will result in profitable commercial mining operations. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur an impairment of our investement in such property interest. All of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent, which are not recoverable. We have experienced losses of this type from time to time including during 2001, when we wrote down our investment in the Rincon del Tigre Project and the Tocantinzinho project by approximately $636,000 and $639,000 respectively.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may decline after the spin-off.

An investment in our common shares involves a high degree of risk. The market price of our shares has historically fluctuated in a large range. Please see "Market for Our Common Stock". The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of new holders from the distribution of our shares to holders of Crown common stock selling our shares. In addition, the price of our common stock may be affected by many factors, including adverse change in our business, a decline in gold or other commodity prices, and general economic trends.

Our mineral exploration activities are inherently dangerous and could cause us to incur significant unexpected costs including legal liability for loss of life, damage to property and environmental damage; any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

Our operations are subject to the hazards and risks normally incident to exploration of a mineral deposit including mapping and sampling, drilling, trenching, assaying and analyzing rock samples, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability for such damage. Any of these risks could cause us to incur significant unexpected costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and ability to finance our exploration activities.

We have a history of losses and if we do not operate profitably in the future it could have a material adverse affect on our financial position or results of operations and the trading price of our common shares will likely decline.

We have reported losses in 8 of our 10 years of operations. We reported losses of $2,079,000, and $3,733,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Although we reported net income of $3,354,000 as a result of recording $5,438,000 gain on derivatives related to our investment in warrants to purchase Crown common stock for the year ended December 31, 2003, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to operate profitably in the future. Other than during 2003, discussed above, we have had net income in only one other year in our history, during 2000, when we sold our Yanacocha property. We cannot predict when, if ever, we will be profitable again. If we do not operate profitably, the trading price of our common shares will likely decline.

Our operations outside of the US may be adversely affected by factors outside our control, such as changing political, local and economic conditions; any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations.

Our mineral interests located in South America consist primarily of mineral concessions granted by national governmental agencies and are held 100% by us or under lease, option or purchase agreements. The mineral interests are located in Peru, Bolivia and Brazil. We act as operator on all of our mineral interests that are not held in joint ventures. The success of projects held under joint ventures that are not operated by us is substantially dependent on the joint venture partner.

Our mineral interests outside of the US are subject to the laws of Peru, Bolivia and Brazil, where we operate. Exploration and development activities in these countries are potentially subject to political and economic risks, including:

● cancellation or renegotiation of contracts;

● disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to US laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;

● changes in foreign laws or regulations;

● changes in tax laws;

● royalty and tax increases or claims by governmental entities, including retroactive claims;

● expropriation or nationalization of property;

● currency fluctuations (particularly in countries with high inflation);

● foreign exchange controls;

● restrictions on the ability for us to hold US dollars or other foreign currencies in offshore bank accounts;

● import and export regulations;

● environmental controls;

● risks of loss due to civil strife, acts of war, guerrilla activities, insurrection and terrorism; and

● other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over the areas in which our exploration activities are conducted.

Consequently, our current exploration activities outside of the US may be substantially affected by factors beyond our control, any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations. Furthermore, in the event of a dispute arising from such activities, we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of courts outside of the US or may not be successful in subjecting persons to the jurisdictions of the courts in the US, which could adversely affect the outcome of a dispute.

We may not have sufficient funding for exploration; which may impair our profitability and growth.

The capital required for exploration of mineral interests is substantial. We have financed operations through utilization of joint venture arrangements with third parties (generally providing that the third party will obtain a specified percentage of our interest in a certain property in exchange for the expenditure of a specified amount), the sale of interests in properties or other assets, and the issuance common stock. We will need to raise additional cash, or enter into joint venture arrangements, in order to fund the exploration activities required to determine whether mineral deposits on our projects are commercially viable. New financing or acceptable joint venture partners may or may not be available on a basis that is acceptable to us. Inability to obtain new financing or joint venture partners on acceptable terms may prohibit us from continued exploration of such mineral interests. Without successful sale, joint venture or future development of our mineral interests we will not be able to realize any profit from our interests in such properties, which could have a material adverse affect on our financial position and results of operations.

A large number of companies are engaged in the exploration of mineral properties, many of which have substantially greater technical and financial resources than us and, accordingly, we may be unable to compete effectively in the mining industry which could have a material adverse affect on our financial position or results of operations.

We may be at a disadvantage with respect to many of our competitors in the acquisition and exploration of mining projects. The marketing of mineral interests is affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These include the price of the raw or refined minerals in the marketplace, imports of minerals from other countries, the availability of adequate milling and smelting facilities, the number and quality of other mineral interests and mineral properties that may be for sale or are being explored. Our competitors with greater financial resources than us will be better able to withstand the uncertainties and fluctuations associated with the marketing of exploration projects. In addition, we compete with other mining companies to attract and retain key executives and other employees with technical skills and experience in the mineral exploration business. We also compete with other mineral exploration and development companies for rights to explore projects. There can be no assurance that we will continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees or to acquire additional rights to explore projects. Any of these risks from competitors could have a material adverse affect on our financial position or results of operations.

The title to our mineral interests may be defective or challenged which could have a material adverse affect on our financial position or results of operations.

In connection with the acquisition of our mineral interests, we conduct limited reviews of title and related matters, and obtain certain representations regarding ownership. These limited reviews do not necessarily preclude third parties from challenging our title and, furthermore, our title may be defective. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we hold good and marketable title to all of our mineral interests. If any of our mineral interests were challenged, we could incur significant costs in defending such a challenge. These costs or an adverse ruling with regards to any of our titles could have a material adverse affect on our financial position or results of operations.

We have no reported mineral reserves and if we are uncuccessful in identifying mineral reserves in the future, we may not be able to realize any profit from our property interests

.

We are an exploration stage company and have no reported mineral reserves. Any mineral reserves will only come from extensive additional exploration and engineering and evaluation of existing or future mineral interests. Inability to identify reserves on our mineral interests could prohibit us from sale or joint venture of our mineral interests. If we are unable to sell, joint venture or eventually develop our mineral interests, we will not be able to realize any profit from our interests in such mineral interests, which could materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations. Additionally, if we or partners to whom we may joint venture our mineral interests are unable to develop reserves on our mineral interests we may be unable to realize any profit from our interests in such properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Our operations could be negatively affected by existing as well as potential changes in laws and regulatory requirements that we are subject to, including regulation of mineral exploration and land ownership, environmental regulations and taxation.

The exploration of mineral interests is subject to federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate in a variety of ways, including regulation of mineral exploration and land ownership, environmental regulation and taxation. These laws and regulations, as well as future interpretation of or changes to existing laws and regulations may require substantial increases in capital and operating costs to us and delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations.

In the countries in which we operate, in order to obtain a permit for exploration, environmental regulations generally require a description of the existing environment, both natural and socio-economic, at the project site and in the region; an interpretation of the nature and magnitude of potential environmental impacts that might result from project activities; and a description and evaluation of the effectiveness of the operational measures planned to mitigate the environmental impacts. Currently the expenditures to obtain exploration permits to conduct our exploration activities are not material to our total exploration cost.

The laws and regulations in all the countries in which we operate are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive, especially environmental laws and regulations. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but we cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. The regulatory environment in which we operate could change in ways that would substantially increase our costs to achieve compliance. Delays in obtaining or failure to obtain government permits and approvals or significant changes in regulation could have a material adverse effect on our exploration activities, our ability to locate economic mineral deposits, and our potential to sell, joint venture or eventually develop our properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Occurrence of events for which we are not insured may materially adversely affect our business

Mineral exploration is subject to risks of human injury, environmental liability and loss of assets. We maintain insurance to protect ourselves against certain risks related to our operations, however, we may elect not to have insurance for certain risks because of the high premiums associated with insuring those risks or for various other reasons; in other cases, insurance may not be available for certain risks. There are additional risks in connection with investments in parts of the world where civil unrest, war, nationalist movements, political violence or economic crisis are possible. These countries may also pose heightened risks of expropriation of assets, business interruption, increased taxation and a unilateral modification of concessions and contracts. We do not maintain insurance against political risk. Occurrence of events for which we are not insured could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Severe weather or violent storms could materially affect our operations due to damage or delays caused by such weather

Our exploration activities in Peru, Bolivia, Brazil and the United States are subject to normal seasonal weather conditions that often hamper and may temporarily prevent expoloration activities. There is a risk that unexpectedly harsh weather or violent storms could affect areas where we conduct exploration activities. Delays or damage caused by severe weather could materially affect our operations or our financial position.

Our business is extremely dependent on gold and commodity prices over which we have no control.

Our operations will be significantly affected by changes in the market price of gold and other commodities since the evaluation of whether a mineral deposit is commercially viable is heavily dependent upon the market price of gold and other commodities. The price of commodities also affects the value of exploration projects we own or may wish to acquire. These prices of commodities fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. The supply and demand for gold and other commodities, the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, investment decisions by large holders of these commodities, including governmental reserves, and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant fluctuations in prices. Such external economic factors are in turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems and political developments. The prices of commodities have fluctuated widely and future serious price declines could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Our business is dependent on key executives and the loss of any of our key executives could adversely affect our business, future operations and financial condition.

We are dependent on the services of key executives, including our Chief Executive Officer, Christopher E. Herald, our Chief Financial Officer, James R. Maronick, and our Vice President of Operations, Walter H. Hunt. All of the above named officers have many years of experience and an extensive background in Solitario and the mining industry in general, and each is also officer of Crown. We may not be able to replace that experience and knowledge with other individuals. Pursuant to a Management Agreement between Crown and us, we reimburse Crown for direct out-of-pocket expenses, payment of between 25% and 75% of executive and administrative salaries and benefits as well as may other administrative costs. Assuming the successful acquisition of Crown by Kinross, the Management Agreement will be terminated and we will contract directly with our management. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown. For more information regarding the Management Agreement see "Related Party Transactions." We do not have key man life insurance policies on any of our executive officers. The loss of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect our business, future operations and financial condition.

We have recently become subject to compliance with the reporting requirements of United States securities laws, which will result in an increase in our legal and financial compliance costs, adversely affecting our financial results.

In contemplation of the spin-off, we recently became reporting issuer under US securities laws. As a reporting issuer in the US, we are required to comply with a variety of new rules and regulations specific to the US. We expect these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, and to make some activities more difficult, time consuming and/or costly. These new rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.

In the future, we may look to develop on our own or joint venture with another mining company to develop and or operate one of our projects, therefore, in the future, our results may become subject to risks associated with development and production of mining projects in general.

We are not currently involved in mining development or operating activities at any of our properties. In order to realize a profit from our properties and mineral interests we either have to: (1) sell such properties outright at a profit; (2) form a joint venture for the project with a larger mining company with more appropriate resources, both technical and financial, to further develop and or operate the project at a profit; or (3) develop and operate such projects at a profit on our own. In the future, if our exploration activities show sufficient promise in a project, we may either look to develop and or operate the project on our own, form a joint venture with another mining company to develop and or operate the project, or sell the property outright and retain partial ownership or a retained royalty based on the success of such project. Therefore, in the future, our results may become subject to the additional risks associated with development and production of mining projects in general.

STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This information statement includes forward-looking statements based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Statements which are predictive in nature and that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as "will", "would", "should", "plans", "likely", "expects", "anticipates", "intends", "believes", "estimates", "thinks", "may", and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results and performance to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, those matters discussed under the caption "Risk Factors."

All forward-looking statements in this information statement are made as of the date hereof, and you should not place undue certainty on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business that are addressed in this information statement. Moreover, although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that we will attain these expectations or that any deviations will not be material.

THE SPIN-OFF

Reasons for the Spin-Off

On November 19, 2003, the Crown Board of Directors formally approved the spin-off. The spin-off will allow the shareholders of Crown to directly participate in the results of our exploration activities and the value of our South American assets. We control a well-diversified portfolio of metal-bearing properties, including properties with potential to host gold, silver, platinum, palladium and zinc. Our properties also vary substantially in the amount of exploration work that has been conducted on each property, from very early-staged exploration properties with only surface sampling, to advanced-staged exploration properties with detailed drilling that defines mineralization within the underlying rock formations. We also anticipate that our common shares will have a wider distribution after the spin-off with Solitario common shares being distributed to approximately 2,000 shareholders of Crown.

Results of the Spin-off

Assuming the completion of the Merger Agreement between Crown and Kinross following the spin-off, Crown will have no ownership interest in us other than the number of shares it may need to retain in order to meet its obligation to deliver our shares to the holders of Crown warrants upon the exercise of those warrants (the "Retained Shares"); we will be an independent company with no management ties to Crown or Kinross. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown.

Currently our shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol SLR. There is no current trading market for our stock in the United States. After the spin-off, we anticipate that our stock will also be traded in the United States on the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB).

Mechanics of the Spin-Off

Crown will accomplish the spin-off by distributing, other than the Retained Shares (and any shares not distributed as fractional shares and therefore retained by Crown), its entire holdings of our common stock, 9,633,585 shares, to Crown's shareholders. Each Crown shareholder as of the close of business on the Record Date will automatically participate in the spin-off.

The final number of shares to be distributed to each Crown shareholder will not be known until the Record Date, as this number is dependent upon the number of shares currently outstanding and the number of shares issued as a result of conversion of outstanding Crown convertible debt and exercise of Crown warrants prior to the Record Date.

The number of Retained Shares will equal the number of our shares that the holders of any outstanding Crown warrants will be entitled to receive as if they had exercised their Crown warrants on a cashless exercise on the Record Date. Crown is required to retain these shares until the Crown warrants are exercised or exchanged, at which time the Retained Shares will be delivered to the Crown warrant holders.

Under the terms of the Crown warrants, as amended, the warrant holder has the option of taking a cashless exercise, in which the holder is allowed to take a reduced number of Crown shares without the payment of any cash to Crown. The number of Crown shares issuable upon a cashless exercise is calculated on the exercise date by: (i) taking the total number of shares the warrant may be exercised for times the net result of (ii) the closing market price of Crown common stock on the exercise date less the exercise price divided by (iii) the closing market price of Crown common stock on the exercise date.

Prior to the Record Date the number of Crown shares that will be outstanding, how many Crown warrants will be exercised, and what method of exercise will be chosen (cash vs. cashless) is unknown. However we have estimated the number of Crown common shares to be outstanding on the Record Date by assuming all of Crown's convertible debentures are converted, and all of Crown's options are exercised and all of Crown's warrants are exercised on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share. Based upon those assumptions, we have estimated that on the spin-off date, those Crown shareholders will receive approximately 0.21 shares of our common stock for each share of Crown common stock held as of the Record Date. If any holders of Crown warrants exercise their warrants on a cash basis the number of shares of our common stock distributed to each holder of Crown common stock would be lower. Crown expects that the spin-off will take place on or about **, 2004.

No fractional shares will be issued and no cash payments will be made in lieu of fractional shares. Crown will retain any shares not distributed as fractional shares. We estimate the total number of our shares from undistributed fractional shares will be less than 1,000 shares in total. Crown will not be giving its shareholders any consideration for fractional shares.

As soon as practicable on or after the spin-off date, Crown will deliver to the transfer agent certificates representing all the shares of our common stock to be distributed in the spin-off. The transfer agent will then mail certificates representing the shares of our common stock to common stockholders of Crown as of the Record Date. Crown will retain the Retained Shares until such time as the warrants are exercised or exchanged for Kinross shares in accordance with the terms of the Crown warrants. Where appropriate, these transactions may take place as book-entry only, without the delivery of any certificates. No Crown stockholder will be required to pay cash or other consideration for any shares of our common stock received in the spin-off, or to surrender or exchange shares of Crown common stock to receive our common stock.

As of March 31, 2004, we own 965,491 shares of Crown common stock and have warrants to acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock at prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. In addition, we could acquire an additional 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock through the conversion of our Crown Senior Notes. Prior to the Record Date, we intend to convert all of our Crown Senior Notes into an additional 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock and to exercise all of our warrants, on a cashless basis.

We have estimated that on the Record Date we will own approximately 6,144,885 shares of Crown (assuming we have converted all of our Crown debt and we have exercised all of our warrants on a cashless basis using the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004 of $2.26 per share). Accordingly we have estimated we will receive approximately 1,309,036 shares of our own common stock as a result of the spin-off. These shares will be retired and have the status of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. This would have the result of reducing the amount of issued and outstanding shares of common stock by the amount of common stock we receive as a result of the spin-off and increasing the percentage ownership interest in us for each of our shareholders.

US Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off

The following is a summary description of the material US federal income tax consequences of the spin-off. This summary is not intended as a complete description of all of the tax consequences of the spin-off and does not discuss tax consequences under the laws of state, local or foreign governments or any other jurisdiction. Moreover, the tax treatment of a stockholder may vary, depending upon the stockholder's particular situation. In this regard, special rules not discussed in this summary may apply to some of Crown's stockholders. In addition, this summary applies only to shares that are held as capital assets.

The following discussion is based on currently existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, existing, proposed and temporary treasury regulations promulgated under the Code and current administrative rulings and court decisions. All of the foregoing are subject to change, which may or may not be retroactive, and any of these changes could affect the validity of the following discussion.

You are urged to consult your own tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences to you of the spin-off described in this document, including the applicability and effect of any state, local or foreign tax laws, and the possible effects of changes in applicable tax laws.

Consequences of Spin-off to Crown's Shareholders

Crown does not expect the spin-off to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code. Accordingly, the receipt by Crown's shareholders of our shares in connection with the spin-off will be treated as a taxable distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares. The character of the taxable distribution to Crown's shareholders will be determined in accordance with the following progression:

(a) a dividend to the extent paid out of Crown's current or accumulated earnings and profits, if any, at the end of the year in which the spin-off occurs; then

(b) a reduction in each shareholder's tax basis in their Crown common stock; and then

(c) gain from the sale or exchange of each shareholder's Crown common stock to the extent the amount received exceeds the sum of the amounts in (a) and (b).

Each Crown shareholder will have tax basis in our stock equal to the fair market value of such stock at the time of the spin-off, and their holding period in our shares for capital gains purposes will begin on the date of the spin-off.

We are a shareholder of Crown and, as such, will be a recipient of our own shares in connection with the spin-off. We will be treated as having received a taxable distribution whose character will be determined under the rules described above. In the event a portion of the distribution is characterized as a dividend, we will be entitled to a dividends received deduction equal to 70% of the dividend amount, leaving 30% of the dividend to be taxable as ordinary income. The remainder of the taxable distribution will first reduce our tax basis, expected to be $1,400,000, (which is the purchase price for our investment in the Crown Senior Notes and the Crown Subordinated B Notes) in the Crown shares, with capital gain recognized for any portion exceeding our tax basis.

Consequences of Spin-off to Crown

Crown expects the spin-off will fail to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code. Accordingly, Crown will be treated as having sold our shares at the fair market value of such shares on the date of the spin-off and will have capital gain measured by the excess of the fair market value of our shares over Crown's adjusted tax basis of such stock. Crown is expected to have current operating losses and net operating loss carryovers in amounts sufficient to offset the capital gain resulting from the spin-off.

Back-up Withholdings Requirements

United States information reporting requirements and backup withholding may apply with respect to dividends, if any, resulting from the spin-off unless you (a) are a corporation or fall into another exempt category, or (b) provide a correct identification number and certify that you have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject to backup withholding. We urge you to consult your tax advisor regarding the Form W-9 filing procedures. Failure to provide Crown with a properly prepared Form W-9 may result in penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of December 31, 2003.

You should read the capitalization data set forth in the table below in conjunction with the "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial and Other Data", "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our historical financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this information statement. There are no anticipated adjustments to our historical capitalization as a result of the spin-off (other than a reduction in the number of our issued and outstanding shares due to retirement of the shares received by us as a result of the spin-off) as we are not issuing any new shares in connection therewith.

(in thousands) | As of December 31, 2003
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 1,273
Stockholders' equity |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 (none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 | $ -
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized, 50,000,000 (24,923,134 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003) | 249
Additional paid-in capital | 22,498
Accumulated deficit | (11,968)
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 1,155
Total capitalization | $11,934

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock has been traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol SLR since July 1994. There currently is no established public trading market for our common shares in the United States. After the spin-off, we anticipate that our shares will also be traded on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices on the Toronto Stock Exchange for our common stock for the quarterly periods from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2003.

|  | All prices are in CDN$
|  | 2002 |  | 2003
Period |  | High | Low |  | High | Low
First quarter |  | $ 0.90 | $ 0.41 |  | $ 0.84 | $ 0.45
Second quarter |  | 0.87 | 0.68 |  | 0.69 | 0.55
Third quarter |  | 0.70 | 0.42 |  | 1.14 | 0.60
Fourth quarter |  | 0.65 | 0.34 |  | 1.87 | 0.99

Shares subject to options

On March 4, 1994, our Board of Directors adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") that authorized the issuance of up to 1,100,000 of our shares under the Plan. The shareholders approved subsequent amendments to the Plan to increase the authorized shares under the Plan to 3,736,000 as of March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2004, we have granted options for 2,711,500 shares that remain unexercised at prices from Cdn$0.65 to Cdn$1.30 and there are options for 250 shares available for grant under the Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2003
Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
| (a) | (b) | (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,488,500 | $0.95 | 250
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | -0- | N/A | -0-
Total | 3,488,500 | $0.95 | 250

Shares that could be sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act

As of March 31, 2004, a total of 2,355,487 shares of our common stock could be sold pursuant to Rule 144. Of these, 16,000 shares were issued to a former Crown employee and 20,000 shares issued to Leonard Harris, a director, upon exercise of options in December 2003 and January 2004, respectively and 757,000 shares were issued to holders of our options during March 2004, prior to the expiration of those options on March 16, 2004 and June 8, 2004. The remaining 1,562,487 shares were issued in transactions occurring in 2001 and 2003 outside the United States pursuant to Regulation S.

Holders of our common shares

As of March 31, 2004 we have approximately 1,250 holders of our common shares.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the future. We intend to retain our earnings to finance the expansion of our business and for general corporate purposes. Our Board of Directors will have the authority to declare and pay dividends on our common stock in its discretion, as long as funds are legally available to do so.

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following table summarizes the consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet data for our business since January 1, 1999. These data have been derived from the audited consolidated statements of operations for our business for each of the five years ended December 31, 2003 and the audited consolidated balance sheets of our business as of December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. You should read this information in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Solitario's historical consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this information statement. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future results.

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
(in thousands except per share amounts) | 2003 | 2002 (1) | 2001 (1) | 2000 | 1999
Revenues and property sales: |  |  |  |  |
Mineral property option proceeds | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ 100 | $ 100
Gain on sale of property | - | - | - | 5,811 | 19
| - | - | - | 5,911 | 119
Costs, expenses and other: |  |  |  |  |
Exploration expense | 418 | 957 | 1,477 | 1,182 | 666
Depreciation and amortization | 488 | 504 | 49 | 18 | 35
General and administrative | 404 | 372 | 511 | 372 | 75
Management fees | 351 | 449 | 590 | 414 | 333
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative securities | (5,438) | (105) | 63 | - | -
Asset write-downs | 26 | - | 1,274 | - | 63
Loss on sale of assets | - | 39 | - | - | -
Interests and other (net) | (272 ) | (137 ) | (231 ) | (360 ) | (144 )
| (4,023 ) | 2,079 | 3,733 | 1,626 | 1,028
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 4,023 | (2,079) | (3,733) | 4,285 | (909)
Income tax expense | 669 | - | - | - | -
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 3,354 | (2,079) | (3,733) | 4,285 | (909)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (2) | - | - | - | - | (5,094 )
Net income (loss) | $ 3,354 | $ (2,079) | $ (3,733) | $ 4,285 | $(6,003)
Earnings (loss) per common share: |  |  |  |  |
Basic before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ 0.14 | $ (0.09) | $ (0.16) | $ 0.24 | $ (0.05)
Change in accounting principle | - | - | - | - | (0.31 )
Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ 0.14 | $ (0.09) | $ (0.16) | $ 0.24 | $ (0.36)
Diluted before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ 0.14 | $ (0.09) | $ (0.16) | $ 0.23 | $ (0.05)
Change in accounting principle | - | - | - | - | (0.31 )
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ 0.14 | $ (0.09) | $ (0.16) | $ 0.23 | $ (0.36)
Basic | 23,638 | 23,407 | 23,387 | 18,163 | 16,855
Diluted | 23,638 | 23,407 | 23,387 | 18,350 | 16,855

BALANCE SHEET DATA: | December 31,
(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002(1) | 2001(1) | 2000 | 1999
Assets |  |  |  |  |
Current assets: |  |  |  |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 1,273 | $ 1,405 | $ 2,723 | $ 6,334 | $ 2,386
Restricted cash | - | - | - | 116 | -
Note receivable | 112 | 111 | 108 | - | -
Investments in marketable equity securities, at fair value | 2,576 | 409 | 268 | 220 | 103
Prepaid expenses and other | 32 | 27 | 69 | 40 | 43
Total current assets | 3,993 | 1,952 | 3,168 | 6,710 | 2,532
Mineral properties | - | - | 3,680 | 4,873 | 53
Mineral interests, net | 2,760 | 3,216 | - | - | -
Assets held for sale | - | - | - | - | 178
Note receivable from Crown, net of discount | 937 | 915 | 893 | - | -
Crown warrants, at fair value | 5,591 | 153 | 47 | - | -
Other assets | 7 | 140 | 302 | 377 | 33
| $13,288 | $ 6,376 | $ 8,090 | $11,960 | $ 2,796
Current liabilities: |  |  |  |  |
Accounts payable | $ 53 | $ 26 | $ 44 | $ 70 | $ 7
Due to Crown | 25 | 73 | 62 | 81 | 39
Total current liabilities | 78 | 99 | 106 | 151 | 46
Deferred income taxes | 1,276 | - | - | - | -
Stockholders' equity: |  |  |  |  |
Preferred stock | - | - | - | - | -
Common stock | 249 | 234 | 234 | 234 | 169
Additional paid-in capital | 22,498 | 21,189 | 21,189 | 21,147 | 16,507
Accumulated deficit | (11,968) | (15,322) | (13,243) | (9,510) | (13,795)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) net of taxes | 1,155 | 176 | (196 ) | (62 ) | (131 )
| 11,934 | 6,277 | 7,984 | 11,809 | 2,750
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $13,288 | $ 6,376 | $ 8,090 | $11,960 | $ 2,796

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

(in thousands) | For the three months ended
Statement of operations: | March 31, 2003 (4) | June 30, 2003 (4) | Sept. 30, 2003 (4) | Dec. 31, 2003
Net income | $ 370 | $ 488 | $ 603 | $ 1,893
Earnings per share: Basic Diluted | $0.02 $0.02 | $0.02 $0.02 | $0.03 $0.03 | $0.08 $0.07
Balance sheet |  |  |  |
Total assets | $6,727 | $7,190 | $7,966 | $13,288

Working capital (3) | $1,224 | $1,228 | $1,295 | $ 3,915
Long-term liabilities | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ -
Stockholders' equity | $6,616 | $7,083 | $7,917 | $11,934

(1) As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 have been restated to reflect mineral interests as intangible assets, to provide for amortization of those interests, to recognize gain and loss on derivative instruments and to record exploration expense for certain previously capitalized annual concession costs.

(2) During 1999, we changed our method of accounting for exploration costs on properties without proven and probable reserves from capitalizing all expenditures to expensing all costs, other than acquisition costs, prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves. This brought the Company's accounting method in accordance with the predominant practice in the US mining industry. The $5,094,000 cumulative effect of the change on prior years is included in the loss for 1999. The effect of the change on 1999 was to increase the loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $69,000 or $0.00 per share.

(3) Working capital consists of current assets less current liabilities.

(4) The financial statements as of and for the quarters ended September 30, June 30 and March 31, 2003 have been restated to reflect mineral interests as intangible assets, to provide for amortization of those interests, to recognize gain and loss on derivative instruments and to record exploration expense for certain previously capitalized annual concession costs. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 have been restated to reflect mineral interests as intangible assets, to provide for amortization of those interests, to recognize gains and losses on derivative instruments and to record exploration expense for certain previously capitalized annual concession costs. The following management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations gives effect to the restatement.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this information statement. Our financial condition and results of operations are not necessarily indicative of what may be expected in future years.

Business Overview and Summary

We are a precious and base metals exploration company with exploration mineral interests in Peru, Bolivia and Brazil and, since February 2004, the state of Nevada in the United States. At March 31, 2004, Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown") owns 37.5% of our common stock. We own Crown common stock, Crown convertible debt and Crown warrants, as described in more detail below.

Our principal expertise is in identifying mineral interests and mineral properties with promising mineral potential, acquiring these mineral interests and mineral properties and exploring them to an advanced stage. Currently we have no mineral interest or mineral properties in development. We currently own eight mineral interest projects under exploration and we own the Yanacocha royalty interest. Our goal is to discover economic deposits on our mineral interests and advance these deposits, either on our own or through joint ventures, up to the development stage. (Development activities include, among other things, the completion of a feasibility study, the identification of proven and probable reserves, as well as permitting and preparing a deposit for mining) At that point we would attempt to either sell our mineral interests or pursue their development, either on our own or through a joint venture with a partner that has expertise in mining operations.

In analyzing our activities, the most significant aspect relates to results of our exploration activities and those of our joint venture partners on a project-by-project basis. When our exploration activities, including drilling, sampling and geologic testing indicate a project may not be economic or contain sufficient geologic or economic potential we may impair or completely write-off the project. Another significant factor in the success or failure of our activities is the price of commodities. For example when the price of gold is up, the value of our gold-bearing mineral interests increases and it also becomes more difficult and expensive to locate and acquire new gold-bearing mineral interests or mineral properties with potential to have economic deposits.

The potential sale, joint venture or development of our mineral interests or properties will occur, if at all, on an infrequent basis. Accordingly, while we conduct exploration activities, we need to maintain and replenish our capital resources. We have met our need for capital in the past through issuance of common stock. We have reduced our exposure to the costs of our exploration activities through the use of joint ventures. We anticipate these practices will continue for the foreseeable future depending on what happens with our investment in Crown.

We have a significant investment in Crown, which includes 965,491 shares of Crown common stock, $1,000,000 of Crown convertible debt, which is convertible into 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock and two Crown warrants, the first which gives us the right to acquire 1,857,143 shares of Crown common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, and the second, which gives us the right to acquire 1,200,000 shares of Crown common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. If all securities are converted and exercised, this would give us 7,079,777 shares of Crown common stock. Crown announced in November 2003 that it had executed an acquisition agreement, whereby Kinross Gold Corporation of Toronto, Ontario, Canada ("Kinross"), will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Crown. Assuming the pending merger between Kinross and Crown is completed, we have estimated our holdings of Crown securities (if all warrants are converted on a cashless basis using Crown's market price of $2.26 on March 31, 2004) would convert into approximately 1,788,776 shares of Kinross common shares with a value of approximately $13.1 million as of March 31, 2004.

Recent Developments

On April 2, 2004, we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru Limited, ("Newmont"), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, whereby Newmont can earn a 51% interest in our 100%-owned La Tola gold property in southern Peru by spending US$7.0 million on exploration and development work over a four-year period. Newmont can earn an additional 14% interest (to a total interest of 65%) by completing a positive feasibility study and arranging 100% of project financing. In addition to our retained participating interest in the project, Solitario retains a sliding scale net smelter return royalty interest on gold and silver production (zero to 2.25% subject to gold price and other conditions) from the property.

In February 2004 we signed an option agreement (the "San Pablo Agreement") to acquire a 100% interest, with no retained royalty, in the 700-hectare San Pablo gold project in southwestern Bolivia. The San Pablo Agreement calls for Solitario to make escalating payments to the underlying private Bolivian owners of the property totaling $1.0 million and spend $190,000 on exploration over a four-year period. The first six-month payment of $10,000 has been made. After spending $15,000 during the first six-month period, we can terminate the San Pablo Agreement at anytime with no further obligations. The project is considered an early-stage exploration project. To date, we have performed only a limited project review consisting of geochemical sampling to confirm the presence of gold mineralization. Solitario has applied for an additional 6,100 hectares of mineral rights (not subject to the San Pablo Agreement) from the Bolivian government. We plan to conduct an extensive rock-sampling program over the next six months to determine the extent of gold mineralization. Pending the results of this program, Solitario will decide whether to seek a joint venture partner or independently fund further exploration.

In February 2004 we signed an option agreement (the "CC Agreement") to acquire a 100%, interest in 88 unpatented claims totaling approximately 700-hectares on the CC gold project in west-central Nevada (U.S.). The CC Agreement calls for Solitario to make escalating payments to the underlying private owner of the project totaling $2.0 million over a five-year period and spend $900,000 over the first four years. The first year's payment of $25,000 has been made. We are committed to spend at least $150,000 on exploration during the first year. The underlying owner is entitled to retain up to a 3% net smelter return royalty on the project. We may reduce the underlying owner's royalty to 1% by paying $2.0 million to the owner at any time during the first eight years of the CC Agreement. After spending $150,000 during the first six-month period, we can terminate the CC Agreement at anytime with no further obligations. The project is considered an early-stage exploration project, although 13 drill holes were completed on the project two years ago. We plan to drill approximately 15 drill holes during 2004. To date, we have performed a limited review of the data and an on-site review of the surface geology.

On November 4, 2003, we completed a private placement to certain Canadian based funds managed by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario of 1,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$1.20 per share for total proceeds of Cdn$1,800,000 or approximately $1,310,000 (net of offering costs). The additional shares significantly contributed to the reduction in Crown's interest in us from 41.2% at September 30, 2003 to 37.5% at March 31, 2004.

On November 20, 2003, Crown and Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross") announced that the two companies have executed an Acquisition Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") whereby Kinross will acquire Crown and its 100%-owned Buckhorn Mountain gold deposit located in north central Washington State, USA, approximately 67 kilometers (42 miles) by road from Kinross' Kettle River gold milling facility. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of Crown will receive 0.2911 shares of Kinross for each share of Crown. The transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subject to regulatory approvals, a minimum two-thirds approval at a special meeting of Crown shareholders and customary closing conditions. It is the intent of Crown that the spin-off of the Solitario shares will take place prior to the completion of the acquisition by Kinross.

On November 8, 2003 Crown announced that it would be distributing (through CRCC) its holdings of 9,633,585 shares of our common stock. When Solitario sold shares in a Canadian public offering in 1994, the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") required that the issued and outstanding shares of Solitario held by CRCC be held in escrow (the "Escrow Agreement") to, among other things, prevent CRCC from selling too large a volume of Solitario shares shortly after the public offering. Over the next three years sixty percent of the shares held in escrow were released to CRCC pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. On December 29, 2003, as required by the TSX, our disinterested shareholders (which excluded holders who are our officers or directors and Crown) voted to approve the release of the remaining 3,140,162 shares of Solitario held in escrow. The shares were released from escrow on January 15, 2004. This will enable Crown (through CRCC) to distribute all of the 9,633,585 shares of our common stock other than shares not distributed as fractional shares and therefore retained by Crown, which are estimated to be less than 1,000 shares in total. Crown will not be giving its shareholders any consideration for fractional shares.

In October of 2001, we invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes (the "Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 of the $3,600,000 Senior Notes issued by Crown in a private placement. The terms of the Senior Notes were the same for all investors. In connection with the investment in the Senior Notes, we also received warrants to acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock at prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. On February 21, 2003 we invested in 10% series B convertible subordinated notes due 2006 (the "Subordinated B Notes") totaling $400,000 of the $2,700,000 Subordinated B Notes issued by Crown in a private placement. The terms of the Subordinated B Notes were the same for all investors. On November 5, 2003 our Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 533,333 shares of Crown common stock. The conversion was in accordance with the terms of the Subordinated B Notes, which allowed for an automatic conversion if Crown's common stock traded above $1.75 per share for twenty consecutive trading days. As of March 31, 2004 we owned 965,491 shares of Crown common stock, from the conversion of the Subordinated B Notes and received as interest on our Senior Notes and Subordinated B Notes.

Assuming the completion of the exchange of shares as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, all of Crown's convertible debentures are converted, all of Crown's options are exercised and all of Crown's warrants are exercised on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share, we estimate we would own approximately 6,144,885 shares of Crown, which would convert into approximately 1,788,776 shares of Kinross. The Kinross shares would be valued at approximately $13.1 million, assuming the March 31, 2004 market price of $7.33 per share for each Kinross share.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Year ended December 31, 2003 to the year ended December 31, 2002

We had net income of $3,354,000 or $0.14 per share in 2003 compared to a loss of $2,079,000 or $0.09 per share in 2002. The primary reason for the income in 2003 was the recognition of $5,438,000 in gain on derivative instruments during 2003, compared to gain of $105,000 in 2002 related to our holding of Crown warrants. Exploration expense in 2003 was reduced as we entered into a joint venture with Anglo Platinum on our Pedra Branca project, whereby Anglo Platinum paid for approximately $457,000 of exploration costs. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a result of legal and accounting costs associated with filing a Form 10 registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission during the fourth quarter of 2003. As a result of our pre-tax net income, we recorded income tax expense of $669,000 during 2003.

During 2003 we recorded an unrealized gain on derivative instruments of $5,438,000 related to our holdings of Crown warrants. Our Crown warrants are exercisable into Crown shares at any time prior to October 2006 at exercise prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. The warrants may be net settled and are classified as derivative instruments at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Accordingly, any increase or decrease in the market value of our Crown warrants is included in the statement of operations as unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments. The fair value of our Crown warrants increased to $5,591,000 at December 31, 2003 compared to $153,000 at December 31, 2002, primarily as a result of the increase in the value of Crown's common stock, which increased from $0.58 per share at December 31, 2002 to $2.52 per share at December 31, 2003. We anticipate we will exercise all of our Crown warrants prior to the completion of the Kinross transaction and exchange any Crown common shares from the exercise of the warrants for Kinross shares.

During 2003 we recorded interest income of $272,000 compared to interest income of $137,000 in 2002. The increase was primarily the result of interest on our investment in Crown Senior and Subordinated B Notes. Crown elected to pay interest in its common shares for the first three quarters of 2003. Per the terms of the Notes, the number of shares of Crown stock received was fixed at a conversion rate which did not fluctuate with the quoted market price of the stock and this resulted in additional interest income of $112,000 during 2003 compared to the amount of interest income we would have received had Crown paid the interest in cash. During 2002, the amount of interest received from Crown, which was also paid in Crown common shares, was approximately $24,000 less than the amount we would have received had Crown paid the interest in cash. If the Kinross transaction is completed in 2004, we expect our interest income will be reduced as our notes receivable will be converted to stock.

Our net exploration expense decreased to $418,000 during 2003 compared to $957,000 in 2002. During 2003 we focused our exploration on our Pedra Branca project as well as newly acquired projects including Triunfo in Bolivia and La Tola in Peru. Although our gross exploration costs decreased slightly from $957,000 in 2002 to $875,000 in 2003, these exploration expenses were offset by joint venture reimbursements of $457,000 by Anglo Platinum on our Pedra Branca project in 2003. The change in our remaining costs primarily consisted of reduced general and administrative salaries in Peru as we eliminated the position of our vice president of South American operations from our office in Lima and we closed one of our two Brazilian offices and reduced our Bolivian office in 2002 which was reflected in the full year costs of 2003. These reductions were offset by increased geologic drilling and field expenses at our Perdra Branca project. We anticipate continuing to acquire, either through staking, joint venture or lease of mineral interests in South and North America during 2004 and expect our related gross exploration expenditure levels to be comparable to the current year. We anticipate our exploration activities and our exploration expenditures may increase significantly if the Crown and Kinross merger is completed, as we will have additional capital resources to execute our strategy of acquiring early-stage stage exploration prospects. We have not planned or budgeted for such an increase and will not do so until the transaction is completed. The amount of the increase cannot be predicted at this time,

Depreciation and amortization expense was $488,000 in 2003 compared to $504,000 in 2002. Depreciation and amortization expense during 2003 included $466,000 of amortization of mineral interests compared to $464,000 in 2002. Beginning January 1, 2002, we have been amortizing our mineral interests in exploration properties over their expected lives of three to five years. The remaining reduction in depreciation and amortization expense between 2003 and 2002 related to furniture and fixtures becoming fully depreciated during 2003 and 2002. We anticipate our depreciation and amortization costs will remain at a similar level to our 2003 recorded amounts, unless as a result of the completion of the Crown and Kinross merger we expand our exploration activities, as discussed in the preceding paragraph. The amount of any potential increase in future depreciation and amortization expense cannot be predicted at this time.

General and administrative costs were $404,000 in 2003 compared to $372,000 in 2002. General and administrative costs increased primarily related to an increase in legal and accounting costs, which increased to $38,000 and $108,000, respectively in 2003 compared to $6,000 and $41,000, respectively, in 2002. The primary reason for the increase is related to work on completing a Form 10 registration statement with the US Securities and Exchange Commission during the fourth quarter of 2003. The remaining general and administrative costs for travel, consulting, and shareholder meetings were comparable between 2003 and 2002. We anticipate an increase in general and administrative costs in the future if the Crown and Kinross merger is completed and the management services agreement is terminated as discussed below under related party transactions.

Management fee expense was reduced to $351,000 in 2003 compared to $449,000 in 2002 partially as a result of a modification in July 2002 of the Management Agreement that reduced the percentage of reimbursement from 75% of certain administrative costs and finance costs to 25% of those administrative costs and 50% of those finance costs. The full effect of this modification was felt in 2003. Additionally our reduced exploration and administrative activity, partially as a result of the Anglo Platinum joint venture on the Pedra Branca project, reduced the need for Crown's management of our overall activities. Net amounts due to Crown as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 were $25,000 and $73,000, respectively, related to the Management Agreement. If the Crown Kinross merger is completed we anticipate the management services contract will be terminated, which will eliminate our management fee expense, but increase our general and administrative costs, as discussed below under related party transactions.

During 2003, we wrote down an investment in marketable equity securities, when we determined the decline in the market value of the related stock was other than temporary, which resulted in a loss of $26,000 being recorded as an asset write-down. During 2002, we recorded a loss on the sale of certain equipment and marketable equity securities of $39,000.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2002 to Year Ended December 31, 2001

We had a loss of $2,079,000 or $0.09 per share in 2002 compared with a loss of $3,733,000 or $0.16 per share in 2001. During 2002 we continued our exploration program in Brazil on our Pedra Branca platinum group metals project. In 2001, we conducted exploration activities on Pedra Branca as well as Tocantinzinho in Brazil and Rincon del Tigre in Bolivia the latter two of which were dropped in 2001. This resulted in a decrease in exploration expense and general and administrative expenses for travel, legal, and exploration support during 2002 compared to 2001. During 2002, we recorded $30,000 in exploration consulting fees paid to the former president of Altoro for assistance with Brazilian and Bolivian activities compared to $120,000 in consulting fees in 2001. During 2001, we wrote down our Tocantinzinho and Rincon del Tigre properties with a charge of $1,274,000 to property abandonment compared to no write-downs in 2002. Beginning January 1, 2002, Solitario reclassified its mineral properties to intangible assets, mineral interests, and began amortizing the excess cost over residual value, which resulted in $477,000 of amortization on mineral interests for the year ended December 31, 2002. We did not amortize any mineral interest costs in 2001.

Interest income was $137,000 and $236,000 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The change in interest income was primarily the result of larger cash balances on hand in 2001 related to the Yanacocha sale which occurred during 2000. A reduction in interest rates between 2002 and 2001 also contributed to the decrease in interest income.

Exploration expense was $957,000 in 2002 compared to $1,477,000 in 2001. Exploration during 2001 included two separate drilling programs at Pedra Branca in Brazil as well as a drilling program at Rincon del Tigre in Bolivia. Additionally, field geology, including sampling, was conducted at Tocantinzinho during 2001. During 2002 we limited our exploration activities to Pedra Branca, which resulted in the lower costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred $372,000 of general and administrative expenses compared with $511,000 in 2001. General and administrative expenses consist of administrative (office rent, payroll, insurance, banking and automobile) legal, accounting and auditing, travel and shareholder-related costs. The increased activities in Brazil and Bolivia and increases in accounting and shareholder costs accounted for the higher general and administrative expenses during 2001 compared to 2002.

Crown provides management and technical services to us under the Management Agreement originally signed in 1994 and modified in April 1999, in December 2000 and July 2002. The modified agreement, which has a three year term, provides for reimbursement to Crown of direct out-of-pocket costs; payment of between twenty-five percent and seventy-five percent of executive and administrative salaries and benefits, rent, insurance and investor relations costs ("Administrative Costs") and payment of certain allocated indirect costs and expenses paid by Crown on our behalf. Management service fees paid to Crown by us in 2002 and 2001 were $449,000 and $590,000, respectively. Net amounts due to Crown as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 were $73,000 and $62,000, respectively, related to the Management Agreement.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $504,000 in 2002 compared to $49,000 in 2001. Solitario began to amortize its mineral interest January 1, 2002 and recorded $464,000 of amortization in 2002 compared to none in 2001. Certain equipment was retired and sold during 2002 as we narrowed our focus of exploration to the Pedra Branca project, resulting in a lower depreciation amount in 2002 compared to 2001 on equipment.

We regularly perform evaluations of our assets to assess the recoverability of our investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable utilizing established guidelines based upon future net cash flows from the asset. Write-downs relating to exploration properties amounted to $1,274,000 in 2001. There were no property or mineral interest write-downs in 2003 or 2002. We wrote-down $636,000, representing the investment in the Rincon del Tigre property in Bolivia and $638,000, representing the investment in the Tocantinzinho property in Brazil, after exploration programs performed during 2000 and 2001 failed to identify economic deposits on those properties. Both of these properties were acquired from Altoro during 2000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Due to the nature of the mining business, the acquisition, and exploration of mineral properties requires significant expenditures prior to the commencement of development and production. In the past, we have financed our activities through the sale of securities, joint venture arrangements, and the sale of interests in our properties. To the extent necessary, we expect to continue to use similar financing techniques; however there is no assurance that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

We had working capital of $3,915,000 at December 31, 2003 compared to working capital of $1,853,000 as of December 31, 2002. The increase is due primarily to our investment in Crown stock received as interest on our Crown Senior Notes and Crown Subordinated B Notes. These shares are recorded at their fair market value of $2,433,000 at December 31, 2003. We also received approximately $1,310,000 (net of offering costs) from a private placement to Sprott Securities in November 2003. These increases were offset by the purchase of $400,000 of the Subordinated B Notes from Crown, as discussed below, and also due to the use of working capital to pay exploration expenses, general and administrative expenses and management fees.

On April 2, 2004, we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru Limited, ("Newmont"), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, whereby Newmont can earn a 51% interest in Solitario's 100%-owned La Tola gold property in southern Peru by spending US$7.0 million on exploration and development work over a four-year period. Newmont can earn an additional 14% interest (to a total interest of 65%) by completing a positive feasibility study and arranging 100% of project financing.

In addition to our retained participating interest in the project, Solitario retains a sliding scale net smelter return royalty interest on gold production (zero to 2.25% subject to gold price and other conditions) from the property. The royalty schedul is as follows:

Gold Price Per Ounce | NSR-Royalty
Over $450 | 2.25%
$350 to $450 | 1.75%
Below $350 | 1.25%

The NSR royalty on silver production is fixed at 1.75%. If Peru imposes a national royalty on gold and silver production, our NSR royalty may be reduced. Solitario's royalty at any given time would be the lesser of the difference between 4.75% less the Peru national royalty or the NSR royalty provided in the table above.

As of March 31, 2004, we own 965,491 shares of Crown common stock and have warrants to acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock at prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. In addition, we could acquire an additional 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock through the conversion of the Crown Senior Notes. Assuming the completion of the exchange of shares as contemplated by the Merger Agreement all of Crown's convertible debentures are converted, all of Crown's options are exercised and all of Crown's warrants are exercised on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share, we estimate we would own approximately 6,144,885 shares of Crown.

We will receive shares of our own common stock as a result of the spin-off. We have estimated we will receive approximately 1,309,036 shares of our own common stock as a result of the spin-off. These shares will be retired and have the status of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. This would have the result of reducing the amount of issued and outstanding shares of common stock by the amount of common stock we receive as a result of the spin-off and increasing the percentage ownership interest in us for each of our shareholders.

Assuming the completion of the merger with Kinross as contemplated in the Merger Agreement we have estimated our Crown common stock would convert into approximately 1,788,776 shares of Kinross. These Kinross shares would be valued at approximately $13.1million, assuming the March 31, 2004 market price of $7.33 per share for each Kinross share. Although no specific plans have been formulated by our Board, we intend to liquidate a portion of our Kinross shares over the next one to three years to reduce our exposure to a single asset, taking into consideration our cash and liquidity requirements, tax implications, the market price of gold and the market price of Kinross stock. Although our Kinross shares would be issued pursuant to an effective registration statement under the US Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), due to our status as a Crown affiliate sales of our Kinross shares must be made in accordance with the requirements of Rule 145(d) under the Securities Act, which could limit or restrict sales of our Kinross shares during the next one to two years. Any funds received from the sale of Kinross shares would be used primarily to fund exploration on our existing properties, for the acquisition and exploration of new properties and general working capital.

If the Crown and Kinross merger is not completed we anticipate we will use existing funds to continue to explore our existing exploration projects. We anticipate we have enough cash and working capital to meet our operating and net exploration requirements through the middle of 2005.

On November 4, 2003, we completed a private placement to certain Canadian based funds managed by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario of 1,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$1.20 per share for total proceeds of Cdn$1,800,000, or approximately $1,310,000 (net of offering costs). The additional shares significantly contributed to the reduction in Crown's interest in us from 41.2% at September 30, 2003 to 37.5% at March 31, 2004 . The funds will be used primarily to fund current exploration programs in Peru, Bolivia and Brazil, for the costs of this registration, and for general corporate purposes.

In August 2003, we signed the Option Agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Triunfo gold-silver-lead-zinc property in west-central Bolivia. Terms of the Option Agreement call for escalating payments totaling $185,000 over a four-year period to the underlying owners. The first payment of $10,000 has been made. A 100% interest in the property can be acquired at anytime within a five-year timeframe for a one-time payment of $1.0 million. Solitario plans to spend a minimum of $100,000 during the first year as part of its five-year $2.3 million work commitment.

On February 21, 2003, we invested $400,000 in Crown's 10% convertible subordinated promissory notes due 2006 Series B (The "Subordinated B Notes"). The issuance of up to $3 million of the Subordinated B Notes was authorized by Crown on February 7, 2003 by Crown's Board of Directors. On February 21, 2003, Crown closed the financing by issuing $2.7 million of the Subordinated B Notes. The Subordinated B Notes are convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share. The Subordinated B Notes pay interest at 10% in stock or cash at Crown's option, and mature on October 19, 2006, the same date as Crown's Senior Notes. Our investment was on the same terms as all other investors. On November 5, 2003, our Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 533,333 shares of Crown common stock.

On January 28, 2003 we entered into an agreement with Anglo American Platinum Corporation, Ltd. ("Anglo Platinum") whereby Anglo Platinum may earn a 51% interest in the Pedra Branca Project, by spending $7 million on exploration at Pedra Branca over a four-year period. Anglo Platinum agreed to a minimum expenditure of $500,000 during the first six months of the agreement. Anglo Platinum can earn an additional 9% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 60%) by completing a bankable feasibility study. Anglo Platinum can also earn an additional 5% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 65%) by arranging for financing to put the project into commercial production. Anglo Platinum has met its minimum required expenditure for the first six months and is currently reviewing the results of the first six months (Phase one) exploration program, before making a decision to fund the second phase of the Pedra Branca Project exploration program. If Anglo Platinum declines to continue, we will retain 100% of the Pedra Branca Project.

In October 2001, we invested $1,000,000 in two Senior Notes issued by Crown; see related party transactions, below. The Solitario Note for $350,000 is convertible into Crown common shares at a conversion price of $0.2916 per share, subject to adjustment. The remaining Senior Note for $650,000 is convertible into Crown common shares at a conversion price of $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment. As part of that investment, Crown issued us warrants exercisable into Crown shares at any time prior to October 2006 at exercise prices between $0.60 and $0.75 per share. We recorded the warrants at their fair value of $110,000 on the date of the transaction, and this fair value was recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes receivable from Crown. The discount is being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest income. As a result, we recorded $22,000 of additional interest income for the each year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. The fair value of the warrants was $5,591,000 and $153,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Cash and cash equivalents were $1,273,000 as of December 31, 2003 compared to $1,405,000 at December 31, 2002. Our cash balances are considered adequate to fund our 2004 exploration plan and all other expenditures. The nature of the mining business requires significant sources of capital to fund exploration, development and operation of mining projects. We will need additional resources if we choose to develop on our own any mineral deposits we have. We anticipate that we would finance these activities through the use of joint venture arrangements, the issuance of debt or equity, the sale of interests in our properties or the sale of our shares of Crown common stock. There can be no assurance that such sources of funds will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

As previously noted, under the Management Agreement we currently reimburse Crown for certain expenses, including management salaries and benefits, rent, insurance and investor relations costs and certain other expenses paid by Crown on our behalf. Upon completion of the spin-off and assuming the completion of the Kinross merger, we will no longer operate under the Management Agreement. This change will result in an increase in general and administrative costs related to salaries and benefits for employees, rent, audit and legal fees, shareholder relations costs, travel and office expenses. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown. See "Management of Solitario Resources Corporation" for further discussion.

We have been a reporting issuer in Canada and recently became a reporting issuer in the US. As a reporting issuer in the US, we are required to comply with a variety of new rules and regulations specific to the US. We expect these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, and to make some activities more difficult, time consuming and/or costly.

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operations during 2003 decreased to $1,157,000 compared to $1,704,000 for 2002 primarily as a result of reductions in net exploration expenses, general and administrative expenses and management fees as discussed above. Investing activities used $299,000 of cash during 2003 compared to $386,000 of cash provided in the same period of 2002. The use of cash during by investing activities 2003 was primarily the result of the purchase of $400,000 of the Subordinated B Notes discussed above, compared to proceeds from the sale of marketable equity securities of $381,000 including the sale of Canyon Resources Corporation common stock for proceeds of $245,000 during 2002. Cash provided by financing activities in 2003 included the sale of our common stock to Sprott Securities for $1,310,000 (net of offering costs). There were no similar sales in 2002.

Additions to mineral interests for concession, land and leasehold costs during 2003 were $10,000 for acquisition costs related to our Triunfo project in Bolivia. Beginning January 1, 2002 we began to amortize our capitalized mineral interest costs in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141 "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". We have recorded $930,000 and $464,000 of accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We expense all exploration costs on properties without proven and probable reserves.

During 2000, we received $6,000,000 from the sale of our Yanacocha property to Newmont. The cash consideration was $5,600,000 with $400,000 deferred and recorded as a long-term note receivable due over a four-year period, pending release of certain contingent liabilities. We received payments of $111,000 and $109,000 of the deferred proceeds, including interest in April 2003 and 2002, respectively. We recorded property acquisition costs of $42,000 from the issuance of its shares during 2001. Primarily as a result of the issuance of shares in connection with the private placement of our shares to Sprott Securities and the acquisition of Altoro, Crown's indirect ownership interest in Solitario was reduced from 57.2% (prior to the Altoro transaction) to 37.5% as of March 31, 2004.

Cash and cash equivalents were $1,273,000 at December 31, 2003. These funds are generally invested in short-term interest-bearing deposits and securities, pending investment in current and future projects. The note receivable from Newmont amounted to $112,000 at December 31, 2003. Investments in marketable equity securities include the fair value of our holdings of 965,491 shares of Crown common stock of $2,433,000 at December 31, 2003. Working capital at December 31, 2003 was $3,915,000.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2003, we have no outstanding long-term debt, capital or operating leases or other purchase obligations.

However, we do have annual concession and lease payments required to maintain our current mineral interest positions. While these payments are not fixed obligations since we can abandon the mineral interests at any time without penalty or further payments, these payments are required in order to maintain our interests. We estimate these payments to be approximately $229,000 annually, before reimbursement from any of our partners. We also have entered into agreements that commit us to exploration and mineral interest expenditures of $380,000 in 2004. We may be required to make further payments in the future if we elect to exercise our options under those contracts.

Additionally, we currently do not lease any facilities. If the spin off of our shares to Crown shareholders is completed and the Crown transaction with Kinross is completed, we estimate our facility lease costs will be approximately $30,000 per year.

We currently have deferred tax liabilities recorded in the amount of $1,276,000. These deferred tax liabilities relate to our unrealized holding gains on our Crown shares and warrants. If the Crown transaction with Kinross is completed, we expect these deferred tax liabilities will become currently payable as we convert these warrants and sell underlying Kinross shares. If the Crown transaction with Kinross is completed it is likely that we will incur additional liabilities. However the amount is dependent on the ultimate transaction value.

Related Party Transactions

At December 31, 2003 Crown owned 38.7% of us. Crown provides management and technical services to Solitario under a management and technical services agreement originally signed in April 1994 and modified in April 1999, December 2000 and July 2002. Under the modified agreement Solitario reimburses Crown for direct out-of-pocket expenses; payment of 25% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for executive and technical salaries benefits and expenses, 50% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for financial management and reporting salaries, benefits and expenses and 75% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for investor relations salaries, benefits and expenses. These allocations are based upon estimated time and expenses spent by Crown management and employees on Crown activities and Solitario's activities. Management believes these allocations are reasonable and the allocations are periodically reviewed by management and approved by independent Board members of both Crown and us. Management service fees are billed monthly, due on receipt and are generally paid within thirty days.

Effective with the completion of the spin-off and assuming the successful acquisition of Crown by Kinross, the Management Agreement will be terminated and we will contract directly with our management and directly pay all administrative expenses. If the spin off is completed and we terminate the Management Agreement, we estimate our annual general and administrative costs would be approximately $400,000 to $500,000 higher after the spin-off as a result of increases in salaries and benefits, rent, audit and legal fees, administrative costs, and shareholder relations costs with such increases in general and administrative costs partially offset by an estimated reduction in annual management fees of approximately $200,000. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown.

Christopher E. Herald, and Mark E. Jones, III are directors of both Crown and us. Christopher E. Herald, James R. Maronick and Walter H. Hunt are officers of both Crown and us. We do not anticipate any changes in these position as a result of the Spin-off. If the transaction between Crown and Kinross is completed, we anticipate Mr. Herald and Mr. Jones will not be directors of Crown and Mr. Herald, Mr. Maronick and Mr. Hunt will not be officers of Crown.

In October 2001, we invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes, ("Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 of the $3,600,000 Secured Notes issued by Crown. The proceeds from the first Senior Note, (the "Solitario Note"), of $350,000 were delivered to Crown. The proceeds from the second Senior Note, of $650,000 were placed in escrow pending the outcome of Crown's voluntary petition for bankruptcy, filed in United States Bankruptcy Court, which was filed on March 8, 2002 (the "Bankruptcy"). In March 2002 an additional $200,000 was advanced to Crown out of escrow of which our share of the advance was $56,000. Crown's plan of reorganization was confirmed on May 30, 2002 and the remaining balance of the proceeds plus interest was released to Crown on the effective date of the Bankruptcy, June 11, 2002. The independent Board members of Crown and Solitario approved the transaction. The terms of the transaction on the Escrowed Notes were the same as given to other senior lenders of Crown (the "Senior Lenders") and, with regard to the terms of the $350,000 Solitario Note, the terms were negotiated with and approved by the other Senior Lenders. During 2003 and 2002, we were paid 249,718 and 182,440 Crown shares, respectively, as interest under the Senior and Subordinated B Notes.

As part of the investment in the Senior Notes, we also received two warrants. The first warrant gives us the right to purchase 1,857,143 shares of Crown for $0.75 through October 2006. The second warrant gives us the right to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Crown at $0.60 through October 2006. The fair value of the warrants at the time of issuance, $110,000, was recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes. This discount is being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest income. The fair value of the warrants, based upon a quoted bid price, was $5,591,000 and $153,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We recognize any increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants as an unrealized gain or loss on derivative instruments in the statement of operations. We recorded an increase in the value of the warrants of $5,438,000 and $105,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, compared to a decrease of $63,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

We entered into a Voting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2002 among Zoloto Investors, LP ("Zoloto") and Crown. Zoloto and we are both shareholders of Crown (the "Signing Shareholders"). Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, Zoloto and we agreed that we will each vote our owned shares during the term of the Voting Agreement for the election of three designees of Zoloto and one designee of Solitario (the "Designee Directors") to the Board of Directors of Crown. The Signing Shareholders agreed that any shares received by either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the Voting Agreement during its term and any successor, assignee or transferee of shares from either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement during its term. The Voting Agreement terminates on the third anniversary from the date of the first annual meeting of shareholders after the date of the Voting Agreement. As of March 31, 2004, the Signing Shareholders collectively held 1,733,866 shares or approximately 7.8% of the outstanding shares of Crown. As of March 31, 2004, we owned 965,491 shares of Crown common stock, from automatic conversion of our Subordinated B Notes and received as interest on our Senior and Subordinated B Notes, we have warrants to acquire 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock at between $0.60 and $0.75 per share and could also acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock through conversion of the Senior Notes.

On June 26, 2001, we agreed to acquire 200,000 shares of Canyon Resources Corporation common stock from Crown at its fair market value of $200,000 at that date. We sold the shares for $245,000 in February 2002, the fair market value at that date. The transaction provided additional working capital to Crown, and was approved by independent Board members of both Crown and us.

On February 21, 2003, we invested $400,000 in Crown's 10% convertible subordinated promissory notes due 2006 Series B (The "Subordinated B Notes"). The issuance of up to $3 million of the Subordinated B Notes was authorized by Crown on February 7, 2003 by Crown's Board of Directors. On February 21, 2003, Crown closed the financing by issuing $2.7 million of the Subordinated B Notes. The Subordinated B Notes are convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share. The Subordinated B Notes pay interest at 10% in stock or cash at Crown's option, and mature on October 19, 2006, the same date as Crown's Senior Notes. Our investment was on the same terms as all other investors. On November 5, 2003, our Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 533,333 shares of Crown common stock.

Joint Ventures

On April 2, 2004, we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru Limited, ("Newmont"), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, whereby Newmont can earn a 51% interest in our 100%-owned La Tola gold property in southern Peru by spending US$7.0 million on exploration and development work over a four-year period. Newmont can earn an additional 14% interest (to a total interest of 65%) by completing a positive feasibility study and arranging 100% of project financing. In addition to our retained participating interest in the project, Solitario retains a sliding scale net smelter return royalty interest on gold and silver production (zero to 2.25% subject to gold price and other conditions) from the property.

We acquired the Pedra Branca platinum-palladium ("PGM") Project located in Ceará State, Brazil, as part of the Altoro acquisition in October 2000. We control 100% interest in 65 concessions totaling 69,244 hectares. Altoro signed an agreement in 1999, which was modified in 2000 and 2003, with Eldorado Gold Corporation ("Eldorado") whereby we could have earned a 70% interest in concessions covering approximately 10,000 hectares, by spending $2,000,000 on exploration by August 2003. However, we elected not to complete the earn-in requirement and the Eldorado lease expired without Solitario earning any interest in the leased concessions. We reacquired concessions within the previously leased Eldorado area in October 2003. Eldorado is entitled to a 2% NSR royalty on these reacquired concessions. In February 2000, Altoro signed a letter of intent, which was subsequently assigned to Rockwell Ventures, Inc., of Vancouver Canada ("Rockwell"), granting Rockwell an option to earn a 60% interest in Altoro's share of the Pedra Branca Project. Under the terms of the agreement, Rockwell was required to spend $7,000,000 on exploration within four years from July 2000, with a minimum expenditure of $1,000,000 during the first year. In addition, Rockwell issued to us a total of 125,433 shares and $50,000 in cash in May 2000 upon regulatory approval of the agreement. In June of 2001, Rockwell terminated its option under the agreement. At December 31, 2003, we own 100% of the Pedra Branca project, subject to the Anglo Platinum agreement discussed below.

On January 28, 2003 we entered into an agreement with Anglo Platinum whereby Anglo Platinum may earn a 51% interest in the Pedra Branca Project by spending $7 million on exploration at Pedra Branca over a four-year period. Anglo Platinum agreed to a minimum expenditure of $500,000 during the first six months of the agreement. Anglo Platinum can earn an additional 9% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 60%) by completing a bankable feasibility study. Anglo Platinum can also earn an additional 5% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 65%) by arranging for financing to put the project into commercial production. Anglo Platinum completed its initial six-month expenditure in July 2003 and is now in the process of deciding whether or not to fund the second six-month $500,000 work commitment.

In July 2002, we signed an agreement with Bear Creek Mining Company ("Bear Creek") whereby Bear Creek can earn 51% interest in the La Pampa property by expending $4.5 million on exploration of La Pampa over a five-year period. As part of the agreement, Bear Creek will pay all costs to maintain the concessions. As part of the agreement Bear Creek must complete a minimum of 1,000 meters of drilling on the property. Bear Creek may earn an additional 14% interest (for a total of 65%) by completing a bankable feasibility study on the property within two years of earning its 51% interest. In February 2004, Bear Creek notified us that it intends to terminate its interest in the La Pampa project. We will evaluate the results of Bear Creek's technical data to determine our future course of action. Solitario has no capitalized mineral interest relating to La Pampa at December 31, 2003.

In August 2003, we signed an Option Agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Triunfo gold-silver-lead-zinc property in west-central Bolivia. Terms of the Option Agreement call for escalating payments totaling $185,000 over a four-year period to the underlying owners. The first payment of $10,000 has been made. A 100% interest in the property can be acquired at anytime within a five-year timeframe for a one-time payment of $1.0 million. Solitario plans to spend a minimum of $100,000 during the first year as part of its five-year $2.3 million work commitment.

In December 1996, we signed an agreement regarding the Bongará project with a subsidiary of Cominco Ltd. ("Cominco") of Vancouver, British Columbia. Cominco had the right to earn a 65% interest in the Bongará project by (among other things) spending a minimum of $17,000,000 over a five-year period from January 2000 forward. Cominco paid us $118,000, including value added taxes of 18% in January 2000 and 1999. In February 2001, Cominco terminated their option to acquire an interest in the Bongará project. We currently hold a 100% interest in the project covering approximately 6,000 hectares and may seek a new joint venture partner to explore and develop this property.

Our exploration activities, funding opportunities and joint ventures may be materially affected by commodity prices and fluctuations. Commodity market prices are determined in world markets and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control.

Exploration Activities

A significant part of our business involves the review of potential property acquisitions and continuing review and analysis of properties in which it has an interest, to determine the exploration and development potential of the properties. In analyzing expected levels of expenditures for work commitments and property payments, our obligations to make such payments fluctuate greatly depending on whether, among other things, we make a decision to sell a property interest, convey a property interest to a joint venture, or allow our interest in a property to lapse by not making the work commitment or payment required.

In acquiring our interests in mining claims and leases, we have entered into agreements, which generally may be canceled at our option. We are required to make minimum rental and option payments in order to maintain our interest in certain claims and leases. Our final 2003 mineral property rental and option payments were approximately $77,000. We were reimbursed approximately $25,000 of this amount from our joint venture partners. In 2004 we estimate mineral property rental and option payments to be approximately $229,000. If our current joint venture partners elect to continue funding their respective joint ventures throughout the remainder of 2004, we would be reimbursed approximately $79,000 of those costs.

We recorded exploration expense $418,000, $957,000 and $1,477,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in 2003 is related specifically to the reimbursement of costs by Anglo Platinum at our Pedra Branca project during 2003, see results of operations above. Exploration expense was $1,477,000 in 2001 compared to $957,000 in 2002 primarily as a result of 2001 drilling programs at Pedra Branca in Brazil and Rincon del Tigre in Bolivia, as well as exploration work on Tocantinzinho in Brazil in 2001. None of these activities were carried out in 2002.

Critical Accounting Policies

Mineral interests

Solitario classifies its mineral interests as intangible assets. Solitario's mineral interests represent mineral use rights for parcels of land not owned by Solitario. Solitario's mineral interests relate to exploration stage properties and the value of such intangible assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of economic minerals believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. Solitario amortizes the excess cost of its mineral interests over their estimated residual value over the lesser of (i) the term of any mineral interest option or lease or (ii) the estimated life of the mineral interest, which approximates Solitario's estimated exploration cycle. Solitario is amortizing its mineral interests over a three-to-eight year period based upon facts and circumstances for each mineral interest on a property-by-property basis including Solitario's current intentions for the property and Solitario's history with similar properties. Solitario has estimated the residual values for its mineral interests to be zero at December 31, 2003 and 2002. If the expected residual values were to change, there could be a material impact to our future amortization. We reevaluate the life and residual values of our mineral interests annually.

Impairment

Solitario regularly performs evaluations of its investment in mineral interests to assess the recoverability and or the residual value of its investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change, such as negative drilling results or termination of a joint venture, which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, utilizing established guidelines based upon discounted future net cash flows from the asset or upon the determination that certain exploration properties do not have sufficient potential for economic mineralization as a result of our analysis of exploration activities including surveys, sampling and drilling. We recorded no impairments of mineral interests in 2003. However we may record future impairment if certain events occur, including loss of a venture partner, reduced commodity prices or unfavorable geologic results from sampling assaying surveying or drilling, among others.

Derivative instruments

Solitario's Crown warrants, which entitle Solitario the right to purchase Crown common stock, have a net settlement feature and accordingly Solitario classifies the Crown warrants as derivative instruments. Solitario has recorded its investment in these warrants at their estimated fair value. Solitario recognizes any increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants as a gain or loss on derivative instruments in the statement of operations.

Income taxes

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of deferred taxes related to certain income and expenses recognized in different periods for financial and income tax reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred taxes also are recognized for operating losses and tax credits that are available to offset future taxable income and income taxes, respectively. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Currently we believe our deferred tax assets, exclusive of our Yanacocha royalty asset, are recoverable. Recovery of these assets is dependent upon our expected gains on the Crown securities we own. If these values are not realized, we may record additional valuation allowances in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 149 "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" to amend and clarify financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The changes in this statement are intended to improve financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly to achieve more consistent reporting of contracts as either derivative or hybrid instruments. SFAS No. 149 has been adopted by Solitario and will be applied prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had a material effect on Solitario's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150 "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" which clarifies the classification as liabilities for certain financial instruments including equity shares that are mandatorily redeemable, or a financial instrument other than equity shares that has an obligation to repurchase the instrument with equity shares, including a conditional obligation to settle the financial instrument with equity shares. SFAS No. 150 has been adopted by Solitario and is effective for financial instruments entered into after May 31, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had a material effect on Solitario's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

On January 1, 2002, Solitario adopted SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which among other things required the reclassification of Solitario's Mineral Properties as Mineral Interest (intangible assets) and the amortization of those assets over their expected useful lives. The excess of the cost of each mineral interest over its estimated residual value is amortized over the lesser of (i) the term of any mineral interest option or lease or (ii) the estimated life of the mineral interest, which approximates Solitario's estimated exploration cycle. Solitario is amortizing its mineral interests over a three-to-eight year period based upon facts and circumstances for each mineral interest on a property-by-property basis including Solitario's current intentions for the property and Solitario's history with similar properties. Solitario has estimated the residual values for its mineral interests to be zero at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Beginning January 1, 2002, Solitario reclassified its mineral properties to intangible assets, mineral interests, and began amortizing the excess cost over residual value, which resulted in $466,000 and $464,000 of amortization on mineral interests for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We did not amortize any mineral interest costs in 2001.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Recission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". SFAS No. 145 eliminates inconsistencies between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications. This statement requires that gains and losses from debt extinguishment should be classified as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria of APB Opinion No. 30. This Statement also amends existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their meanings under changed conditions. We adopted SFAS No. 145 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of this Statement has not had any effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities", which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with these activities and generally requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity shall be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 does not apply to costs associated with the retirement of long-lived assets covered by SFAS No. 143. SFAS No. 146 will be applied prospectively and is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement has not had any effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". Under SFAS No. 143, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation covered under the scope of SFAS No. 143 is recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability would be accreted to its present value, and the capitalized cost would be depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity would either settle the obligation for its recorded amount or incur a gain or loss upon settlement. We have adopted SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had any effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 clarifies the disclosure required by guarantors of (a) the nature of any guarantee, (b) maximum potential amount of future payments associated therewith, (c) carrying amounts of liabilities, if any, related to the guarantor's obligations under the guarantee and (d) the nature and extent of any recourse or collateral for recovery of any amounts paid under the guarantee. FIN 45 also clarifies the requirement to recognize at the inception of a guarantee a liability for the fair value of obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantee, including the obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of guarantee. We have applied the provisions of FIN 45 for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002 and the effect of adopting this interpretation was not material.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46") and in December 2003 issued FIN 46R. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of variable interest entities which have one or both of the following attributes (1) the equity investment at risk in not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties which is provided by other parties that will absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity, (2) the equity investors lack controlling financial interest as evidenced by (i) the ability to make decisions regarding the entity's activities through voting or similar rights (ii) the obligation to absorb expected losses, which make it possible for the entity to finance its activities and (iii) the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is the compensation for absorbing the expected losses. FIN 46 was immediately effective for variable interest entities formed after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R requires the adoption of either FIN 46 or FIN 46R in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application for all other types of variable interest entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

BUSINESS

General

We operate in one segment, mining geology and mineral exploration. Our operations are currently confined to Peru, Bolivia and Brazil and one exploration property in the state of Nevada, which we acquired in February 2004. We have in the past and expect that we will in the future limit our activities to the evaluation and exploration of mining interests. As of March 31, 2004, we had four full-time employees, all located in South America. We extensively utilize contract employees and laborers to assist us in the exploration on most of our projects. Upon the spin-off of our shares and upon the completion of the merger between Crown and Kinross, we anticipate the Management Agreement with Crown will be terminated and the Crown management team will resign their respective positions at Crown and will continue to serve our business on a full time basis, thereby increasing our number of employees. In the event that the Kinross transaction is not completed, we anticipate that we would continue to operate under the Management Agreement with Crown.

In the past, we have received revenues related to interest income on invested cash balances and from the sale of mineral property interests. Revenues from the sale of our mineral property interests have in the past been infrequent and have occurred at irregular intervals. Any revenues from the sale of mineral property interests in the future would also be infrequent and at irregular intervals.

We are an exploration stage company. Our focus is to evaluate, acquire and explore exploration stage mineral interests. We have no reported mineral reserves. Any future mineral reserves will only come from extensive additional exploration and engineering and evaluation of existing or future mineral interests. There can be no assurance that we will report mineral reserves in the future.

The acquisition and exploration of mineral interests require significant expenditures prior to the decision to develop and or commencement of production. We have in the past financed our activities through the sale of securities, joint venture arrangements and the sale of mineral property interests. To the extent necessary, we expect to continue to use similar financing techniques. There can be no assurance that such financing will in the future be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.

2004 Plan of Operations

Our 2004 plan of operations is expected to be similar to prior operating plans. We generally divide our operational activities into three components: (1) the evaluation/generation of potential new acquisitions; (2) the further evaluation of existing mineral interests through exploration work; and, (3) the search to identify and secure a joint venture partner and negotiate a favorable joint venture agreement on mineral interests with sufficient merit.

Specifically, we will conduct reconnaissance exploration programs in Peru, Brazil and Bolivia in 2004 to identify promising new gold properties for acquisition. Our evaluation efforts will be driven by both independent in-field research and by other companies or individuals presenting acquisition opportunities to us. We identify areas of potential mineral interest through researching government geologic reports, studying satellite images and our general knowledge of mineralized geologic trends in the regions in which we work. Our in-field research consists of collecting rock, soil and stream sediment samples, and geologic mapping in areas of interest, with increasingly more detailed work as results warrant. We believe our existing technical and administrative staff is sufficient to carry out this portion of our planned 2004 operations. However, if we are successful in acquiring new properties, we may need to add additional technical staff to explore new properties in greater detail.

The other important component to our plan of operations for 2004 is the further evaluation of existing mineral interests. Currently, Anglo Platinum is evaluating whether or not to fund further exploration costs for the Pedra Branca project and Bear Creek Mining has notified us it intends to terminate its option for the La Pampa project in 2004. We will determine our future plan for this project after evaluation of Bear Creek Mining's data. Newmont is funding exploration on the Yanacocha royalty property. We do not anticipate significant costs or professional staff time associated with these projects in 2004. However, in the case of the Pedra Branca project, if Anglo Platinum elects to fund further exploration, we will manage the exploration program and additional contract staff will be required to conduct our exploration activities. If Anglo Platinum does not elect to fund further exploration, we will search for a new joint venture partner for the project.

We are planning to joint venture the Bongará zinc project, the Sapalache gold project and the Triunfo gold-silver-lead-zinc projects during 2004. We may also elect to joint venture the La Tola gold project if we believe a favorable agreement can be secured. Generally, we seek well-financed major mining companies with technical expertise in the commodity type associated with the respective project. Although this activity does not require a substantial amount of capital, it often requires a significant time commitment by our technical staff to complete the technical reports and to assist the potential joint venture partner in its due diligence evaluation activities. If we are unable to secure a joint venture partner on these projects, we plan to maintain our mineral interests on a low-cost care and maintenance status. We believe our existing cash and working capital, and our technical and administrative staff are sufficient to carry out our 2004 operating plan.

Competition and Markets

A large number of companies are engaged in the exploration of mineral interests, many of which have substantially greater technical and financial resources than we do. Therefore, we may be at a disadvantage with respect to many of our competitors in the acquisition and exploration of mining interests.

Foreign Operations

We have mineral interests in Peru, Bolivia and Brazil and held mineral interests in Argentina until March 1998. These countries have, from time to time, experienced periods of political and economic instability. Foreign properties, operations and investments may be adversely affected by local political and economic developments, including nationalization, exchange controls, currency fluctuations, taxation and laws or policies as well as by-laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade, investment and taxation. Furthermore, it is particularly important that we maintain good relationships with the governments in the countries in which we operate. We may not be able to maintain such relationships if the governments or policies related to mining in these countries change. Certain other regions in which we may conduct operations have also been subject to political and economic instability, creating uncertainty and the potential for a loss of resources dedicated to these regions.

The marketing of minerals is affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. Among factors beyond our control are the price of the raw or refined minerals in the marketplace, imports of minerals from other countries, the availability of adequate milling and smelting facilities, the price of fuel, the availability and the cost of labor, and the market price of competitive materials.

Regulatory Environment

The exploration for and development, production and sale of minerals are subject to federal, state, provincial and local regulation in a variety of ways, including environmental regulation and taxation. These regulations vary depending on the country in which mineral property is held. Generally, federal, state, and local environmental regulations have a significant effect on all companies, including ours, engaged in mining or other extractive activities, particularly with respect to the permitting requirements imposed on such companies, the possibilities of project delays, and the increased expense required to comply with such regulations. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all such regulations in all the jurisdictions in which we operate.

We are subject to income taxes, state and local franchise taxes, personal property taxes, value added taxes, and mineral severance taxes levied by various governmental units in the countries in which we operate. Mineral severance taxes vary between countries and, within a single country, the amount of tax, based on a percentage of the value of the mineral being extracted, varies from mineral to mineral. Our operations may also subject to taxation by each locality in which we own mineral interests or do business.

Mineral Projects

Pedra Branca Platinum Group Metals Project, Brazil

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of Pedra Branca Property)

We are exploring the Pedra Branca property for platinum and palladium mineralization (platinum group metals, or "PGM"). We hold 65 exploration concessions in Ceará State, Brazil comprising the Pedra Branca Project at December 31, 2003, which totaled approximately 69,244 hectares. Altoro Mineraçao Ltda., a subsidiary of ours incorporated in Brazil, holds all 65 concessions. Altoro signed an agreement in 1999, which was modified in 2000 and 2003, with Eldorado Gold Corporation ("Eldorado") whereby we could have earned a 70% interest in concessions covering approximately 10,000 hectares, by spending $2,000,000 on exploration by August 2003. However, we elected not to complete the earn-in requirement and the Eldorado lease expired without Solitario earning any interest in the leased concessions. In October 2003, we reacquired a 100%-interest in concessions within the previously leased Eldorado area. Eldorado is entitled to a 2% NSR royalty on these reacquired properties.

On January 28, 2003 we entered into an agreement with Anglo Platinum whereby Anglo Platinum may earn a 51% interest in the Pedra Branca Project, by spending $7 million on exploration at Pedra Branca over a four-year period. Anglo Platinum agreed to a minimum expenditure of $500,000 during the first six months of the agreement. Anglo Platinum can earn an additional 9% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 60%) by completing a bankable feasibility study. Anglo Platinum can also earn an additional 5% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 65%) by arranging for financing to put the project into commercial production. Anglo Platinum has met its minimum required expenditure for the first six months and is currently reviewing the results of the first six month (Phase one) exploration program, before making a decision to fund the second phase of the Pedra Branca Project exploration program. If Anglo Platinum declines to continue, Solitario will retain 100% of the Pedra Branca Project.

Land payments for 2004 are projected to be approximately $37,000. This amount may change due to the reduction or addition of properties, or a change in the currency exchange rate.

The mineral interests held by us within the property are subject to the mining regulations of Brazil. These rights are granted by the Brazilian government and administered by the National Department of Mineral Production ("DNPM"). To obtain mineral concessions from the DNPM, we must provide the DNPM with work plans and pay an initial fee of approximately $0.36 per hectare, depending upon the Brazil-U.S. exchange rate. To keep the concessions in good standing, we must continue to pay the regular annual fee of $0.36 per hectare and provide the DNPM with annual progress reports. We are subject to yearly inspections by the DNPM for compliance with reported plans and environmental regulations. In addition, the exploration concessions may be converted to exploitation concessions by demonstrating the economic feasibility of the project.

Prior to mining on the claims we must reach an agreement with the surface rights owners of the affected land. Additionally, we must pay a royalty to governmental agencies based on the materials produced. This amount is 0.2% of the sales for precious metals excluding gold, which is subject to a 3% royalty.

We currently hold no surface rights to the property but have entered into short-term agreements with the surface rights owners to compensate for exploration activities.

A number of prospects have been located on the project, which have undergone surface, and in some cases, drill exploration. A total of 15 prospects have been located throughout the property with surface showings of significant geochemical values. Drilling has intersected significant mineralization on six of these prospects.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

Access to the project is by paved road from the state capital of Forteleza in Ceará State and by local farm roads. Where necessary, local access is constructed. The largest towns in the immediate vicinity of the project are Pedra Branca and Boa Viagem. A field camp is located at the small community of Capitao Mor. The climate is warm and dry for eight months of the year with a warm wet season prevailing for the remaining four months. Year-round operation can be conducted. The topography is rolling to flat and vegetation is sparse to heavy brush. The elevation in no location exceeds 800 meters.

3. History

In the 1980's Rio Tinto Ltd., ("Rio Tinto") and Gencore, Ltd. ("Gencore") performed exploration work on part of the project now operated by us. Both companies did surface exploration and drilling, including 42 diamond drill holes by Rio Tinto and 8 diamond drill holes by Gencore on the former Eldorado lease. In 2000 Altoro acquired the concessions from the government over the property previously held by Rio Tinto. We acquired additional concessions in 2000 and 2001 to cover extensions of the mineralized trend.

Altoro, prior to the Plan of Arrangement with us, conducted surface work and drilled 18 diamond drill holes. Subsequently, Altoro entered into a Joint Venture agreement with Rockwell Ventures, Inc. ("Rockwell") of Vancouver, British Columbia under which Rockwell conducted further surface exploration and drilled an additional 31 holes. Rockwell terminated its agreement with Altoro in June 2001. From July 2001 until January of 2003, we conducted geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys and drilled 54 diamond drill holes. From January through July 2003, Anglo Platinum funded a drilling program that focused on better defining the Esbarro, Curiu and Cedro prospects. A total of 178 core holes have been drilled on the property to date.

4. Geological Setting

The project lies within an Archean-aged block in the Brazilian shield, which is characterized by amphibolite grade metamorphic rocks of various compositions. The most common rock types in the area are unmineralized intermediate to felsic composition gneisses and granitic intrusive phases.

The PGM mineralization occurs in specific stratigraphic intervals within a segmented mafic-ultramafic layered complex. The mineralized intervals comprise concordant layers, originally of composition varying from peridotite to dunite. These layers contain chromite and/or minor sulfides of iron, copper and/or nickel. The primary silicate ultramafic minerals in the rocks have been variably converted to amphibole, serpentine or talc. A number of separate bodies of the ultramafic phases of the complex have been discovered, some of which contain the PGM-bearing stratigraphic intervals. All of the rocks have been folded and faulted to differing degrees during dynamic metamorphism in the area.

5. Prior Exploration

Surface exploration conducted, initially by Altoro, and subsequently by Rockwell and then us, consists of:

Reconnaissance geologic mapping and rock sampling

Systematic line cutting, soil sampling and geologic mapping of lines

Ground magnetics

Stream sediment and panned-concentrate geochemistry

Diamond drilling of twelve prospect areas

All of the above work has been conducted directly by us, our predecessor or its partners with the exception of diamond drilling which was performed by Boart-Longyear Geoserv do Brasil and Major Drilling. Ground magnetometry was conducted primarily using a Scintrex Portable EnviMag model number 788011 hand-held magnetometer with a base station for recording diurnal corrections.

Soil and rock surveying conducted to date shows that both methods reliably reflect the location of outcropping and subcropping PGM mineralization. Twenty areas with significant soil and/or rock anomalies have been located within the area covered by line gridding. Detailed geologic mapping has been conducted over the majority of these locations to determine the source of anomalous PGM values. Further, basic work of this nature is planned in future programs to more fully determine the potential of the entire project.

The targeted ultramafic rocks are generally more magnetic than the surrounding rocks and magnetometry has been shown to be effective at locating these bodies, though magnetometry and surface geochemical sampling does not determine the PGM content of an ultramafic body with certainty. Additional ground magnetometry is planned to locate potential buried targets and to direct surface exploration techniques to define outcropping and subcropping bodies. Drilling has successfully intersected potentially ore-grade PGM mineralization in several areas.

We believe the data obtained from the above exploration activities to be reliable, however the nature of exploration mineral properties and analysis of geological information is subjective and data and conclusions are subject to uncertainty including invalid data as a result of many reasons, including sample contamination, analysis variation, extrapolation, and the use of geologic and economic assumptions.

6. Mineralization

The stratigraphic layering of an ultramafic body controls the PGM content of the ultramafic rocks. In many cases the PGM grade is associated with the mineral chromite. In other areas the PGM is more closely related with minor sulfide concentration. However, the presence of either chromite or sulfides within ultramafic rocks does not assure elevated PGM grade.

Within PGM-enriched ultramafics, grade and thickness can vary considerably. Widths encountered vary from several to tens of meters in interpreted true thickness. In no location has drilling been conducted on spacing of sufficient density to assure the continuity necessary to define reserves. For this reason no representation can be made as to the probability of defining reserves.

7. Drilling

A total of 178 holes totaling 12,646 meters of core drilling have been completed on the project to date. Of this, 3,217 meters were drilled by Rio Tinto and Gencore for which the core itself is not available, nor are the procedures documented under which the holes were completed.

In the case of holes drilled by Altoro, Rockwell and us, the following procedures were followed. Drill holes were either of NQ (1 and 7/8 inch) or HQ (2 and 1/2 Inch) diameter and were boxed in the field under the supervision of the geologist in charge. With the exception of weathered material near surface, at least 90% of the core had recoveries exceeding 90%. The core was transported to the field camp in sealed core boxes where processing took place under the supervision of the geologist in charge.

Based on drill results to date we believe the prospects Esbarro, Cedro, Curiu, and Santo Amaro North exhibit results warranting further definition drilling of high priority. We are planning on drilling additional targets in future programs.

The Esbarro prospect, with 99 holes, has the largest database of information of the drilled prospects. Drilling was conducted on fences spaced at approximately 50 meters apart and drill holes averaging 50 meters apart. A high percentage of holes have intersected mineralized material, but the spacing of the drill holes is currently insufficient to substantiate the continuity necessary to define a reserve.

The Curiu prospect is the second most detailed prospect drilled to date with 15 holes completed to date. Drilling was conducted on approximately 25-meter spaced centers. A high percentage of the holes intersected mineralized material. However, additional drilling is required before a reserve can be estimated for this deposit.

The inability to resample the drilling of Rio Tinto core holes has reduced the confidence, which would normally be attributed to these results. However, one twin hole drilled next to a Rio Tinto hole at Esbarro showed excellent reproducibility of results. During the current exploration phase of the program, the Rio Tinto and Gencore results are accepted as accurately representing the sampled interval. However, in order to establish a resource or reserve, additional twin holes and/or infill holes are necessary to provide a degree of confidence commensurate with assignment to these categories.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Following is a tabulation of samples taken through October 2003, which are assigned a high degree of confidence in relation to location, type and sample procedure.

Sample Type | Number of Samples
Core | 6,411
Rock/channel | 2,531
Soils | 20,640
Stream Sediments | 2,531
Panned Concentrates | 840

Rock sampling generally employed the use of composite surface samples, which are representative aggregates of available material from an outcrop or sub-cropping body collected on the surface. Selective sampling was occasionally used to identify the geochemical character of a rock not representative of an outcrop. This technique represents a small percentage of the total samples collected. Soil samples were collected of soil horizons thought to be derived from the decomposition of underlying bedrock. Soils were screened to -80 mesh prior to pulverization. Stream sediment geochemistry has been applied to both active wet stream beds and dry stream beds. Panned concentrate sampling of both dry and wet stream beds has been effectively utilized on a regional basis.

No known significant factors relating to sampling, drilling or recovery exist that are thought to have an impact on interpreted results. Core recovery is rarely less than 90%, but such cases are sufficiently uncommon as to not have an adverse effect on the interpretation of results.

Assays results for the Rio Tinto and Gencore core samples cannot be checked, as the core is not available for resampling. For all other samples, assaying for PGM was done by Bondar Clegg Laboratories of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Check assays were performed by Altoro prior to our merger with them, and by Rockwell Ventures. All of our programs have been, and will continue to be conducted under a check assay program in progress with samples sent to a third party laboratory (Lakefield Laboratories).

9. Security of Samples

Core samples are sawn on site into two halves, one submitted to the laboratory and one kept in a secure location on site. The half-core, selected according to geologic criteria or regularly spaced intervals, is sent by land or air to the sample preparation laboratory in Goiania, Brazil operated by Bondar Clegg Laboratories. The samples are sealed on site under the supervision of the geologist in charge and the laboratory is instructed to report any breaks in the seal to the Project Manager. No such security breaches have been noted since Solitario has taken over operation of the project.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

There are no reported reserves.

11. Mining Operations

There are no current mining operations associated with this project.

12. Planned Exploration

Further exploration is planned in 2004 including additional geophysics, geologic mapping, geochemical sampling and core drilling as warranted by results in hand and resources available.

Triunfo Gold-Silver-Lead-Zinc Property, Bolivia

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of Triunfo Property)

We are exploring the Triunfo project for gold, silver, lead and zinc. The property position consists of three concessions totaling 256 hectares. We signed an Option to Purchase ("Option") a 100% interest in the concessions with private Bolivian individuals ("Vendors") controlling the concessions in July 2003. The option calls for Solitario to spend up to $2.3 million on exploration activities over a five-year period. The first year work commitment is $100,000 and the second year is $200,000, with escalating commitments thereafter. Additionally, the vendors may receive payments of up to $185,000 over the first four years, with an option for us to acquire a 100% interest in the property by making a one-time payment of $1.0 million ("Option Payment") by the fifth anniversary of the signing of the Option. The first $10,000 payment has been made with payments of $15,000, $25,000 and $35,000 due six, twelve and eighteen months from the date of signing, respectively. Solitario can elect to make the Option Payment prior to the fifth anniversary and forego any remaining scheduled work commitments or vendor payments, as long as the scheduled work commitments expenditures and vendor cash payments are current at the time the Option Payment. We may elect to terminate the Option at anytime without any additional payment or work commitment obligations due to the Vendor.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The project is located about 50 kilometers east of the Bolivian capital of La Paz at an elevation of approximately 4,500 meters. Access is gained by a well-maintained gravel road from La Paz. We have completed construction of a 2.5-kilometer road to the property significantly upgrading access.

Climate is typical of the Bolivian altoplano that varies from cool dry weather to sub-freezing days with significant snow and wind. Although located relatively near La Paz, the nearest small village of Tres Rios is situated six-kilometers to the southeast. The surrounding area has high relief and the property is positioned between the mountains of Illimani and Mururata, both over 6,000 meters high. Vegetation is very sparse.

3. History

Not much is known about the history of mining on the property. During the past ten years, the Vendors excavated a 50-meter long adit to sample a part of the mineralized area. Prior to the Vendors work, it is believed that several other adits were excavated into other parts of the mineralized zone, but these tunnels have subsequently collapsed.

4. Geological Setting

The geology of the Triunfo project consists of Paleozoic-aged interlayered shales, black shales, siltstones and quartzites. These rock formations have been faulted and folded. Two large granitic batholiths occur to the north and south of the property.

5. Prior Exploration

We began surface exploration activities in August 2003, and consequently only a limited amount of surface exploration consisting of detailed geologic mapping and channel sampling has been completed. Mapping has indicated that the main area of interest occurs along an east-west trending anticline with an interpreted steep fault along its axis. To date, geochemical results for 132 rock chip samples have been received. An induced-polarization geophysical survey may be undertaken to further develop drill targets for 2004.

6. Mineralization

The project hosts a large mineralized area extending for at least 800 meters in length and up to 200 meters in width. Mineralization occurs as a stockwork zone of veining within a sequence of Paleozoic shales, siltstones and quartzites. The veining is generally steeply dipping and trends east-west parallel with the axis of folding. Within the mineralized zone, surface sampling has returned elevated values of gold, silver, lead and zinc.

7. Drilling

No drilling has been conducted on the project.

8. Sampling and Analysis

To date, 132 rock chip samples have been conducted over select parts of the property. The sampling procedure consists of chipping pieces of rock with a hammer from outcropping rock formations over a continuous length of usually five meters. The axis of the five-meter long sample is oriented perpendicular to the trend of veining, wherever possible. The samples are placed in cloth or plastic bags, labeled and sealed, and then sent to ALS Chemex laboratories for analysis.

9. Security of Samples

Surface rock chip samples collected are sealed within a cloth or plastic bag by the geologist and stored in a secure area until shipped to the laboratory via bus transportation.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

There are no reported reserves or resources.

11. Mining Operations

There are no current mining operations associated with this project.

12. Prior Exploration

Detailed geologic mapping and channel sampling were completed in 2003. An induced polarization geophysical survey is recommended for 2004. The results of the geologic mapping, geochemical sampling and geophysical survey will be compiled and evaluated to determine the best location for drill testing the property. If we determine that favorable drill targets have been defined by our work, we would then anticipate a drilling campaign in mid-2004. We will seek a joint venture partner to fund this drilling.

Bongará Zinc Project, Peru

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of Bongará Property)

The Bongará project consists of 10 concessions comprising 6,000 hectares of mineral rights granted to Minera Bongará S.A., a subsidiary of ours incorporated in Peru. The property is located in the Department of Amazonas. All of the claims are owned 100% by us and have no underlying agreements or royalty obligations. According to Peruvian law, concessions may be held indefinitely, subject only to payment of annual fees to the government. Each year a payment of $3.00 per hectare must be made by the last day of June to keep the claims in good standing. Land payments made in 2003 were $21,600 and payments in 2004 are projected to be the same. We have a surface rights agreement with the local community, which controls the surface of the primary area of interest. This agreement provides for an annual payment of $5,000 in return for the right to perform exploration work including road building and drilling.

An environmental permit is required for advanced exploration projects in Peru. The requisite environmental and archeological studies have been completed and the permit has been granted for future exploration activities subject to approval of amendments describing annual planned work.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The Bongará property is accessed by the paved Carretera Marginal road, which provides access from the coastal city of Chiclayo. The area of the majority of past drilling and the most prospective mineralization is currently inaccessible by road, the work to date having been done by either foot or helicopter access.

The climate is tropical jungle and the terrain is mountainous. Seasonal rains hamper exploration work for four to five months of the year by limiting access by road. A small village is located approximately four kilometers from the drilling area. The nearest larger town is Pedro Ruiz, which is a base of operations for the project on the main road. We have located a project office in Pedro Ruiz during exploration activities.

3. History

We discovered the Florida Canyon mineralized zone of the Bongará Project in 1996. Subsequently, we optioned the property in December 1996 to Cominco. Cominco withdrew from the joint venture in February 2001. All of the significant work on the property has been conducted by Cominco and is described below in section 5, Exploration.

4. Geological Setting

The geology of the Bongará area is relatively simple consisting of a sequence of Jurassic and Triassic clastic and carbonate rocks which are gently deformed. The Mississippi Valley type mineralization occurs in the carbonate faces of this sedimentary sequence.

5. Prior Exploration

We conducted a regional stream sediment survey and reconnaissance geological surveys leading to the discovery of the Florida Canyon area. The discovered outcropping mineralization is located in two deeply incised canyons within the limestone stratigraphy.

Subsequent to our initial work, Cominco conducted extensive mapping, soil and rock sampling, stream sediment surveys and drilling. This work was designed to determine the extent and grade of the zinc-lead mineralization and the controls of deposition. All work performed by us or Cominco was done by direct employees of the respective companies with the exception of the drilling which was performed by Bradley Drilling Co.

6. Mineralization

Mineralization occurs as massive to semi-massive replacements of sphalerite and galena localized by specific sedimentary facies within the limestone stratigraphy and by structural feeders and karst breccias. A total of eleven preferred beds for replacement mineralization have been located within the middle unit of the Chambara Formation. Mineralization is associated with the conversion of limestone to dolomite, which creates open spaces within the rock formations, promoting the passage of mineralizing fluids through the rock formations. Karst features are localized along faults, in particular the Sam Fault, which cuts the Chambara formation in a north-northeasterly direction. Mineralized karst structures are up to fifty meters in width. The stratigraphically controlled mineralization is typically several meters in thickness but locally attains thicknesses of eight to ten meters. Generally the stratigraphic mineralization, while thinner, is of higher grade.

The middle unit of the Chambara formation, where mineralized, is commonly dolomitized within the zone of highest sedimentary-induced permeability. Dolomitization reaches stratigraphic thicknesses in excess of 100 meters locally. This alteration is thought to be related to the mineralized event in some cases and is an important exploration tool. Continuity of the mineralization is thought to be demonstrable in areas of highest drilling density by correlation of mineralization within sedimentary facies typical of specific stratigraphic intervals.

7. Drilling

A total of 81 diamond drill holes (HQ and NQ size) have been completed at the Florida Canyon Prospect. These holes vary in depth up to 610 meters. The geologic targets that these holes test are nearly evenly divided between near-vertical karst hosted targets and near-horizontal stratigraphically-controlled mineralization. The mineralized area that has been drilled measures approximately two by two kilometers. All drilling was done by a LF-70 core-drilling rig.

Drilling on stratigraphic targets has shown that certain coarser bioclastic or pseudo-breccia facies of the stratigraphy are hosts for mineralization. Although the mineralization intersected in adjacent holes within the same stratigraphic unit often appears to be continuous, the drill spacing of approximately 100 meters is insufficient to define a reserve in Mississippi Valley type deposits. Similarly, the drilling on the karst style of mineralization is of insufficient density to define a resource.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Rock samples taken were composited from mineralization or alteration within an outcrop. The samples were pulverized and analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) for a variety of elements including zinc and lead. Soil samples were screened to -80 mesh prior to pulverization and analysis by ICP.

Core samples were transported from the drill by helicopter in sealed boxes to the processing facility in Pedro Ruiz where they were split by a diamond saw. Half of the core was selected according to geologic criteria under the supervision of the geologist in charge and shipped in sealed bags by land to SGS Laboratories in Lima, where all samples were analyzed by ICP. Any samples that contained greater than 1% zinc, were then analyzed by wet chemistry assay for zinc and lead to provide a more accurate analysis of grade.

The following is a summary of samples taken and analyzed according to type within the Florida Canyon area.

Sample Type | Number of Samples
Core | 1,970
Rocks | 3,326
Stream Sediments | 217
Soils | 7,733

It was found that ICP systematically underestimated the true grade in high-grade samples in excess of 1% zinc. This systematic error varies according to grade with the higher samples having the largest error. The average error of all reported core results for ICP was approximately 10% below the true grade. All grades reported to the public have been based on assay rather than geochemical techniques in order to represent the most accurate data possible.

9. Security of Samples

As described above the geologist in charge supervised the control of the core sample handling from the drill to the sample preparation facility and in the preparation itself. Sealed containers were used for shipping the samples to the laboratory. No breaches of security of samples are known to have occurred.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

There are no reported mineral reserves or resources.

11. Mining Operations

No mining operations have occurred on the project.

12. Planned Exploration

The Bongará project is on care and maintenance until a joint venture partner is secured.

Yanacocha Royalty Property, Peru

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of Yanacocha Property)

The Yanacocha royalty property consists of 69 concessions totaling approximately 61,000 hectares in northern Peru 25 kilometers north of the city of Cajamarca. The property position consists of a rectangular-shaped contiguous block of concessions nearly 50 kilometers long in an east-west direction and 25 kilometers wide in a north-south direction. The southern boundary of the royalty property abuts Newmont Mining Corporation's Minera Yanacocha mining operation, a large gold mine currently in operation.

We held the concessions until April 2000, at which time we signed an agreement with Newmont Peru, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (both companies referred to as "Newmont"), whereby we sold our Yanacocha Property to Newmont for $6,000,000 and a sliding scale net smelter return royalty ("NSR-Royalty") that varies from two to five percent, depending on the price of gold. The table below sets forth the NSR-Royalty schedule:

Gold Price Per Ounce | NSR-Royalty
Over $400 | 5%
$360 to $400 | 4%
$320 to $360 | 3%
Below $320 | 2%

Newmont has not reported reserves on our NSR-Royalty property and we have not received any royalty income from Newmont.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The property is easily accessed within an hour by paved and improved gravel roads from the city of Cajamarca, a regional hub for commerce and government administration. The terrain ranges from gently rolling to mountainous and varies in altitude from 2,800 to over 4,200 meters. A rainy season of approximately four months hampers exploration and access, but year-round work can be done. Vegetation in the area consists of alpine tundra type conditions.

3. History

The majority of concessions were acquired in 1993, with several concessions added in 1994 and 1995. We conducted regional surface exploration on the property in 1994 and 1995, which included a limited core-drilling program on two gold targets. At various times between 1995 and 1999, we joint ventured the property with three major mining companies, Barrick Gold Corporation, Rio Tinto, Ltd., and Placer Dome, Inc. All three companies conducted limited surface exploration programs and each elected to terminate its respective option to earn an interest in the property. Barrick Gold Corporation was the only company to conduct exploration drilling on the property. Newmont purchased the property, subject to our retained net smelter return royalty, in April 2000. In 2003, Newmont conducted a detailed helicopter-bourn geophysical survey over the entire project. Newmont has indicated that it may to conduct a core-drilling program in 2004.

4. Geological Setting

The property is situated within a northwest trending belt of Tertiary-aged volcanic and associated intrusive rocks that overlie and intrude Cretaceous-aged sedimentary rocks. The Cretaceous sediments are strongly deformed and consist of a lower sequence of sandstones, shales and quartzites and an upper sequence of carbonate rocks. Approximately half the property is underlain by Tertiary volcanic rocks consisting mainly of older andesitic to dacitic flows and tuffs. Locally these older volcanics are covered by a younger rhyo-dacitic tuff unit. Mineralization usually is hosted in the older volcanic unit.

5. Prior Exploration

We have independently, and through the efforts of our various joint venture partners, collected rock, soil and stream sediment samples on the surface. Geologic mapping has revealed 15 medium-to-large areas of hydrothermal alteration contained within both the volcanic and sedimentary rock units. Three gold targets were tested by us and our joint venture partner Barick Gold prior to Newmont purchasing the project in 2000. We conducted a large-scale helicopter-bourn geophysical program in 1994 that identified a number of magnetic anomalies. Newmont conducted a more detailed and comprehensive helicopter-bourn geophysical program in 2003. The results of this program, or any other exploration results generated by Newmont, are not available to us for review.

6. Mineralization

Gold mineralization has been identified in at least 15 separate areas within altered volcanic and sedimentary rocks. Alteration generally consists of silicification (addition of quartz to the host rock) and argillization (destruction of feldspar minerals to clay). Rock chip sampling within these altered areas often contains anomalous values of gold, silver, mercury, arsenic or antimony. Alteration appears to be partially controlled by fault structures in the underlying rock formations or proximity to intrusive rocks.

7. Drilling

Twenty-one core-holes totaling approximately 2,700 meters were drilled on three gold targets prior to Newmont purchasing the project in 2000. We drilled eight holes on the Los Negritos prospect and Barrick Gold drilled nine holes at the Shuito prospect and four holes at the Chaluaquero prospect.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Prior to Newmont's purchase of the property, Solitario and its various joint venture partners collected rock samples as composites of specific rock types or as select samples of altered lithologies. Regional stream sediment sampling was also conducted throughout the property. Specific results from these various surface sampling programs have not been compiled into a single data base since the Newmont purchase. We do not anticipate compiling these results, as we no longer hold an operating interest in the property.

9. Security of Samples

The geologist in charge of the project supervised the collection and shipping of the samples by ground transportation to the sample preparation facility in Lima, Peru. Pulps were subsequently shipped to laboratories in North America for analysis.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No resources or reserves have been delineated on the property.

11. Mining Operations

No mining is conducted on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

We own an NSR-Royalty interest in the property and have no participating interest or control over future exploration activities. Newmont has indicated that it may drill test two target areas in 2004. However, Newmont may, in its sole discretion, elect not to conduct any further exploration in the future.

La Pampa Gold Property, Peru

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of La Pampa Property)

The La Pampa property consists of four concessions, covering 3,400 hectares located in the Department of Lambayeque in west-central Peru. Minera Solitario Peru S.A., a subsidiary of ours incorporated in Peru, owns the claims. No underlying agreements or royalties exist for these claims. According to Peruvian law concessions may be held indefinitely subject only to payment of annual fees to the government. A payment of $3.00 per hectare must be made by the last day of June to keep the claims in good standing.

In July 2002, we signed an agreement with Bear Creek Mining Company ("Bear Creek") whereby Bear Creek could have earned 51% interest in the La Pampa property by expending $4.5 million on exploration of La Pampa over a five-year period. As part of the agreement, Bear Creek would have paid all costs to maintain the concessions complete a minimum of 1,000 meters of drilling on the property. Bear Creek may earn an additional 14% interest (for a total of 65%) by completing a bankable feasibility study on the property within two years of earning its 51% interest. In February 2004, Bear Creek notified us that it intends to terminate its option to earn an interest in the property.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The property is accessed by paved road from the coastal city of Chiclayo. The terrain is flat to rolling and is dry and hot most of the year. Operations can be performed year-round. No towns or infrastructure exist on the property but the small community of Chongoyape is nearby.

3. History

We acquired two concessions in 1999 and two more in 2003. We conducted surface sampling and geologic mapping on the project in 1999 and 2000. In 2003 our joint venture partner, Bear Creek, geologically mapped and sampled the mineralized zone in greater detail. Additionally, Bear Creek conducted a trenching program over selected parts of the mineralized zone. No previous work was known to have been conducted on the property. Bear Creek completed a core drilling program in early 2004.

4. Geological Setting

The rocks in the area belong to the Oyutun volcanics, which are intermediate composition lava and ash flow tuffs and believed to be Jurrasic in age. The layers of volcanic rocks are generally only slightly tilted and folded with minor faulting.

5. Prior Exploration

We have collected rock samples on the surface consisting of composite, select and channel samples. Geologic mapping has revealed a large system of hydrothermal alteration contained within certain volcanic units and also along structural features. Bear Creek has conducted approximately 1,100 meters of trenching and 500 meters of drilling across the mineralized zone.

6. Mineralization

Gold enrichment occurs in silicic and phyllic alteration types within the volcanic stratigraphy. The gold is associated with small (<1%) concentrations of pyrite, most commonly associated with silica flooding, which comprises more than 90% of the rock. Little silver or other economic elements occur with the gold. Gold enrichment is irregularly distributed over an area two kilometer by two kilometers. Elevated gold values are generally associated with north trending structures. Surface gravel deposits cover much of the prospective area making it difficult to determine the extent of surface mineralization.

7. Drilling

Five drill holes totaling 502 meters tested three separate drill targets.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Rock samples were collected as composites of specific rock types or as select samples of quartz-flooded lithologies associated with structures or bedding. In some cases channel samples were taken of structures up to 200 meters in width or of volcanic lithologic units up to 80 meters in thickness. A total of 809 rock and channel samples have been taken to date. Only 11 stream sediment samples have been collected and analyzed. The rocks were shipped to Actlabs preparation laboratory in Lima and the pulp were analyzed in their laboratory in Lancaster, Ontario. No duplicates or replicate analyses have been taken.

9. Security of Samples

The geologist in charge has supervised the collection and shipping of the samples by ground transportation to the sample preparation facility in Lima.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No resources or reserves have been delineated on the property.

11. Mining Operations

No mining is conducted on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

We are planning on reviewing Bear Creek's exploration results and technical data to determine if further exploration is warranted on the property.

Sapalache Gold Project, Peru

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of Sapalache Property)

The Sapalache gold project is located in the Department of Piura, Peru near the town of Huancabamba. The project consists of two claims that are held by a third party on behalf of Solitario.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The town of Huancabamba is accessed by paved and unpaved roads from the town of Chiclayo. The area is mountainous varying in altitude from 3,000 to over 4,000 meters. A rainy season of approximately four months hampers exploration and access, but year-round work can be done.

3. History

The claims were staked in 1999 by a third party on behalf of us. No previous work is known to have been done in the area. We have no liabilities for royalties or underlying payments.

4. Geological Setting

The area is underlain by Tertiary volcanic rocks of the Llama Formation, which are gently deformed.

5. Prior Exploration

We have conducted reconnaissance mapping and sampling, primarily during 1999.

In 1999 we entered into an agreement with AngloGold whereby AngloGold could earn 51% of the rights to the claims with an expenditure of $6,000,000. During 2000, AngloGold collected rock samples, conducted geologic mapping and drilled four diamond core holes under this agreement. The results of the drilling were elevated in gold, but considered sub-economic in grade and thickness. All of the work performed on the property was done directly by AngloGold or us with the exception of diamond drilling which was performed by Esondi S.A. AngloGold terminated the agreement in 2000. Although we have no immediate exploration planned for Sapalache, we are holding this property for potential joint venture in the future.

6. Mineralization

Gold mineralization is found in structures ranging from 1 to 100 meters in width, which have been variably altered to silica and phyllic mineral assemblages. Minor amounts of pyrite are common. Trace amounts of galena have been observed.

7. Drilling

During 2003, AngloGold drilled four holes ranging from 83 to 164 meters, totaling 601 meters.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Rock samples were taken as composites of outcrops of silicified volcanics. Core was selectively sampled and split with a core saw and assayed by ALS laboratories for Au and a suite of ICP trace elements. No check assays were done.

Following is a listing of samples taken and analyzed by sample type.

Sample Type | Number of Samples
Rocks | 522
Core | 510
Soils | 229
Stream Sediments | 122

9. Security of Samples

The chain of custody procedures for sampling performed by AngloGold are not known.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No mineral reserves or resources are reported on the property.

11. Mining Operations

There are no mining operations on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

No exploration is currently planned for the property in 2004. We intend to seek a joint venture partner to fund further exploration on this property.

La Tola Gold Project, Peru

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of La Tola Property)

In October 2003, we acquired the La Tola project to explore for gold and possibly silver. The project is located in southern Peru and consists of 14 concessions totaling 12,000 hectares. We own a 100%-interest in the concessions without any underlying owners or royalties. According to Peruvian law claims may be held indefinitely subject only to payment of annual fees to the government. A payment of $3.00 per hectare must be made by the last day of June each year to keep the concessions in good standing. These payments to the government of approximately $36,000 were made in 2003 and early 2004. An equal amount will be due in 2004 to keep all the concessions in good standing.

On April 2, 2004, we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru Limited, ("Newmont"), a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, whereby Newmont can earn a 51% interest in Solitario's 100%-owned La Tola gold property in southern Peru by spending US$7.0 million on exploration and development work over a four-year period. Newmont can earn an additional 14% interest (to a total interest of 65%) by completing a positive feasibility study and arranging 100% of project financing.

In addition to our retained participating interest in the project, Solitario retains a sliding scale net smelter return royalty interest on gold production (zero to 2.25% subject to gold price and other conditions) from the property. The royalty schedul is as follows:

Gold Price Per Ounce | NSR-Royalty
Over $450 | 2.25%
$350 to $450 | 1.75%
Below $350 | 1.25%

The NSR royalty on silver production is fixed at 1.75%. If Peru imposes a national royalty on gold and silver production, our NSR royalty may be reduced. Solitario's royalty at any given time would be the lesser of the difference between 4.75% less the Peru national royalty or the NSR royalty provided in the table above.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

The town of Callalli is accessed by approximately 150 kilometers of paved and unpaved roads from the city of Arequipa in southern Peru. The area is situated in the alta plano geomorphic region that consists of gently rolling hills varying in altitude from 3,800 to over 4,800 meters. A rainy season of approximately four months from December through March is relatively mild allowing for year-round work. Vegetation in the area consists of alpine tundra type conditions.

3. History

We staked the 11 concessions in 2003. No previous work is known to have been conducted in the area. We have no obligation for royalties or underlying payments.

4. Geological Setting

The area is underlain by Tertiary volcanic rocks typical of the gold-bearing volcanic field situated throughout the central part of Peru. The area is cut by structure that have undergone hydrothermal alteration, but with very little structural deformation.

5. Prior Exploration

We have conducted reconnaissance rock chip and stream sediment sampling in 2003. Additional rock chip sampling, soil sampling and mapping is currently being conducted. If results warrant, drilling is planned for 2004. Bedrock exposures are quite limited throughout the area.

6. Mineralization

Gold mineralization is found in structures ranging from 1 to several meters in width and in wallrock that has been variably altered to silica, argillic and/or phyllic mineral assemblages. Quartz and barite veining is found variably throughout the area. Assay results for approximately 150 rock chip samples indicate gold mineralization occurs along a northeast trending zone that is over eight kilometers long and up to one kilometer in width.

7. Drilling

No drilling has been conducted on the property.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Rock samples were collected as composites of specific rock types or as select samples of quartz-flooded lithologies associated with structures or bedding. Approximately 100 rock chip samples have been taken to date. The rocks were shipped to ALS preparation laboratory in Lima and the pulp was analyzed in their laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. No duplicates or replicate analyses have been taken.

9. Security of Samples

The geologist in charge has supervised the collection and shipping of the samples by ground transportation to the sample preparation facility in Lima.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No resources or reserves have been delineated on the property.

11. Mining Operations

No mining is conducted on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

We plan to continue rock chip sampling, geophysical survey in 2004 and will initiate a soil-sampling program in the near future. If results warrant, a drilling program is planned in 2004. In April 2004 we signed a Letter Agreement with Newmont Peru, Ltd. on the La Tola project, as discussed above.

San Pablo Gold Project, Bolivia

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of San Pablo Property)

The San Pablo gold project is located in Potosi Department of southwestern Bolivia 32 kilometers east of the small town of Rio Mulatos. The property consists of two concession blocks. One block of concessions covering 650 hectares is held under an Option to Purchase Agreement (the "San Pablo Option") from private Bolivian parties (the "Owners").

The San Pablo Option calls for us to make payments to the Owners of $10,000 on signing (paid), $15,000 on the six and twelve month anniversaries, $20,000 after 18 months, $25,000 on the 24 and 30 month anniversaries, $30,000 on the 36 and 42 month anniversaries, and $830,000 on the 48 month anniversary. Solitario must also spend $15,000 during the first six months and $25,000 every six month period thereafter on exploration during the first four years. Upon completion of these payment and work commitment obligations, we will then own 100% interest in the property without the Owners retaining any royalty whatsoever. We may elect to terminate the San Pablo Option at anytime without any additional payment or work commitment obligations due to the Owners.

We also applied with the Bolivian government for the mineral rights to an additional 6,100 hectares north of the aforementioned property. Upon issuance of the mineral concession, and payment of $6,100 to the Bolivian government, we will own 100% interest in the mineral rights with no third party royalties.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

South from the city of Oruro, the property can be reached by 237 kilometers of paved highway to the town of Rio Mulatos, and then by 25 kilometers of difficult unimproved road. The property is situated in the mountainous region of Cordillera Los Frailes, varying in altitude from 4,000 to 5,200 meters. A winter season of approximately four months hampers exploration and access from November through February, but year-round work can be done. The area is virtually devoid of vegetation except for flat valley bottoms that contain sparse alpine-type vegetation. The property is quite remote and very little infrastructure or human population occurs near the project area.

3. History

Although prospecting was probably conducted on the property prior to 1988, no information is available concerning that time period. Since 1989, Mintec (1989), Reminsa (1990) and La Barca S.A. have conducted limited surface sampling programs and metallurgical testing.

4. Geological Setting

We have only conducted a limited amount of surface reconnaissance exploration on the property to date. Consequently only a limited amount of geologic information has been gathered on the property. The area is underlain by Silurian-aged sedimentary rocks that are intruded by Tertiary-aged igneous rocks. The sedimentary rocks are reported as the Catavi and Llallagu Formations and appear to be folded into an antiform.

5. Prior Exploration

We conducted reconnaissance geochemical sampling prior to signing the San Pablo Option. Prior to our sampling program, Mintec S.A. channel sampled the Willakollito prospect in 1989. Reminsa re-sampled the Mintec channels and sampled rocks and colluvial sediments. La Barka S.A. excavated trenches and channel sampled the San Pablo prospect. La Barka also conducted gravity, flotation and cyanide leach metallurgical tests on its trench samples.

6. Mineralization

Gold mineralization is found in sulfide veins, veinlets and as disseminations within the sedimentary rocks, and much less commonly in the intrusive igneous rocks. Gold appears to be associated with quartz, bismuthinite, arsenopyrite and various iron sulfides. Three altered zones have thus far been identified and range in size from 500 to 1,200 meters long and 10 to 200 meters wide.

Previous workers report channel samples perpendicular to these mineralized zones assayed 110 meters containing 1.26 grams per tonne gold ("gpt gold"), 20 meters at 8.88 gpt gold and 110 meters at 1.11 gpt gold. We cannot verify the accuracy of these results based on the work we have conducted to date, but our sampling results are not inconsistent with the reported assay intervals.

7. Drilling

No drilling has been conducted on the property.

8. Sampling and Analysis

We received results from 28 rock-chip channel samples our geologists collected on the property. The samples were shipped to ALS Chemex laboratories for analysis. No check, duplicate or replicate analyses have been taken.

9. Security of Samples

Solitario's geologist in charge has supervised the collection and shipping of the samples by ground transportation to the sample preparation facility. The chain of custody procedures for sampling performed by previous companies are not known and cannot be verified.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No mineral reserves or resources are reported on the property.

11. Mining Operations

There are no mining operations on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

We plan to conduct an intensive sampling campaign over the entire property to better focus subsequent exploration work. We may elect to joint venture the property sometime in the future.

CC Gold-Silver Project, Nevada, USA

1. Property Description and Location

(Map of CC Property)

The CC gold-silver project is located 45 miles southeast of the town of Fallon in Churchill County, Nevada, USA. The project consists of 85 unpatented mining claims totaling approximately 670 hectares. The claims are subject to a Letter Agreement ("CC Agreement") between us and CES Exploration Services, L.L.C. ("CES"). To earn a 100% interest in the property, the CC Agreement calls for us to make payments to CES of $25,000 on signing (paid), $25,000 on the first (annual) anniversary, $75,000 on the second anniversary, $150,000 on the third anniversary, $725,000 on the fourth anniversary and $1,000,000 on the fifth anniversary. We must also spend $150,000 on exploration during the first year (firm commitment) and $250,000 the second, third and fourth years. Upon completion of these payment and work commitment obligations, we will then own 100% interest in the property, subject to a 3% net smelter return royalty to CES. We may reduce the royalty to CES to a 1% net smelter return royalty by paying the owner $2.0 million within eight years of signing the CC Agreement. We may elect to terminate the CC Agreement at anytime after completing the first year $150,000 work commitment without any additional payment or work commitment obligations due CES.

2. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiology

Access to the project area is very easy. The town of Fallon lies 45 miles north of the project area by paved highway and three miles west of the highway via gravel roads. The area is typical of Nevada's basin and range geomorphology. Altitudes range from 1,600 to over 2,000 meters. A winter season of approximately four months hampers exploration and access from December through March, but year-round work can be conducted.

3. History

Approximately half the claims were staked in 2001 and the other half in early 2004. In 2003 NDT Ventures Inc, a junior Canadian exploration company, optioned the property from CES, and subsequently dropped the option in late 2003.

4. Geological Setting

The area is underlain by Tertiary volcanic rocks associated with the 19 million year old Fairview Peak caldera. The volcanic rocks are generally classified as pyroclastic in origin and range in composition from adesite to rhyolite. Much younger dacite dikes cut the older mineralized volcanic package.

5. Prior Exploration

Unknown previous workers excavated numerous small pits within the mineralized vein. In 2003 NDT Ventures conducted a limited surface mapping program and a shallow reverse circulation drilling campaign.

6. Mineralization

Gold and silver mineralization is associated with an east-west trending quartz vein that dips moderately to the south. Although the vein itself is generally only one to three meters in width, mineralization can extend for tens of meters away from the vein in variably silicified and argillically altered latite volcanic bedrock. The mineralization is characterized by low sulfide concentrations.

7. Drilling

NDT Ventures drilled thirteen very shallow reverse circulation drill holes totaling 481 meters.

8. Sampling and Analysis

Only a limited number of rock and soil samples are reported from the property and are considered of limited value. Of greater importance are the 252 three-foot reverse circulation drill hole samples collected by NDT Ventures. Drill samples were collected at the base of the drill rig's cyclone and reduced in volume by a Gilson splitter to about a four-kilogram sample. Samples were transported by the geologist to the ALS Chemex sample prep laboratory in Reno, Nevada, and the pulps were then analyzed in ALS Chemex's laboratory in Vancouver, B.C. Check assay procedures are unknown.

9. Security of Samples

The chain of custody procedures for sampling performed by NDT Ventures Inc.are not known.

10. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimations

No mineral reserves or resources are reported on the property.

11. Mining Operations

There are no mining operations on the property.

12. Planned Exploration

We plan to conduct a 15-hole, 1,250-meter reverse circulation drilling program in 2004.

Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this information statement, we are not a party to, nor are we aware of any pending legal action against our company that would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

MANAGEMENT OF SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

The executive officers of Crown and Solitario historically have been the same individuals, and we have reimbursed Crown for our share of management costs through the Management Agreement discussed previously. Upon the completion of the sale of Crown to Kinross, it is expected that the Crown management team will resign their respective positions at Crown and will continue to serve our business on a full time basis. At the present time we do not anticipate any significant changes to our executive management team.

The following table sets forth certain information as of the date of this information statement regarding our executive officers and directors. They hold office until their successor has been elected and qualified, or until their death, resignation or removal from office.

Name |  | Age |  | Title
Christopher E. Herald |  | 50 |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Mark E. Jones III |  | 64 |  | Chairman of the Board and Director
Walter H. Hunt |  | 52 |  | Vice President - Operations
James R. Maronick |  | 48 |  | Chief Financial Officer
John Hainey |  | 71 |  | Director
Leonard Harris |  | 76 |  | Director
Daniel Leonard |  | 67 |  | Director

The following biographies describe the business experience of our executive officers and directors:

Mark E. Jones, III

(64) has been Chairman of the Board since August 1993. Mr. Jones has also been a Director of Crown since it commenced operations in February 1989. He was Chairman of the Board of Crown from February 1989 to June 2002 when he was appointed Vice-Chairman. He was President of Crown from September 1989 to November 1990. Prior to his association with Crown, Mr. Jones was a founding partner of Jones, Loyd & Webster, Inc., a Houston-based corporate finance and investment banking firm that specialized in oilfield equipment financing. Mr. Jones also serves as Chairman of Jaguar Resources, a gold exploration company based in Houston, Texas. Mr. Jones attended the University of Texas.

Christopher E. Herald

(50) has been a Director since August 1992. He has also served as Chief Executive Officer since June 1999 and President since August 1993. Mr. Herald has also served as a Director of Crown since April 1989, as Chief Executive Officer of Crown since June of 1999, President of Crown since November 1990 and was Executive Vice President of Crown from January 1990 to November 1990. Prior to joining Crown, Mr. Herald was a Senior Geologist with Echo Bay Mines and Anaconda Minerals. Since 1998, Mr. Herald has also served as a Director to TNR Resources, a mineral exploration company located in Vancouver, British Columbia. In January 2004, Mr. Herald was appointed to the Board of Griffon Gold Corporation, a private gold mining company. Mr. Herald received a M.S. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. in Geology from the University of Notre Dame.

Walter H. Hunt

(53) has been Vice President - Operations and President - South American Operations since June of 1999. He also served as Vice President - Peru Operations from July 1994 until June 1999. Mr. Hunt has also been Vice President - Operations of Crown since 1994. Mr. Hunt has over 20 years of exploration, development and operational experience with Anaconda Minerals, Noranda and Echo Bay Mines where he served as Superintendent, Technical Services and Chief Geologist at Echo Bay's Kettle River Operations. Mr. Hunt received his M.S. degree in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. degree from Furman University.

James R. Maronick

(48) has served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Crown since June 1999 and served as Vice President - Finance and Secretary/Treasurer and Vice President - Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of Crown since September 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Maronick served as Vice President - Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of Consolidated Nevada Gold Fields Corporation from November 1994 to September 1997. Mr. Maronick graduated with honors from the University of Notre Dame in 1977 with a BA in accounting and received his Masters degree with highest honors from the University of Denver in 1986.

John Hainey

(71) has been a director since 1999. He is an independent financial consultant and spent the last ten years, before his retirement, as a mining analyst in the Canadian investment industry with Dundee Securities Corporation (formerly Eagle & Partners), Yorkton Securities Inc., Loewen, Ondaatje, McCutcheon & Company and Canaccord Capital Corporation. Prior to 1988, Mr. Hainey spent over 30 years working in the mining industry, both in Canada and abroad, which covered engineering, operations, consulting and business development and included 17 years with BP Resources Canada Ltd. Mr. Hainey is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario and Saskatchewan and of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. He is also a Chartered Engineer (U.K.) and a Fellow of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy (U.K.). He holds an A.C.S.M. (Hons.) in Mining Engineering from the Camborne School of Mines in England.

Leonard Harris

(76) has been a director since June 1998. Prior to his retirement from Newmont, Mr. Harris gained over 50 years experience in the mining industry including serving as General Manager of Minera Yanacocha, South American's largest gold mine, and Vice President and General Manager of Newmont Latin America. Mr. Harris has over 20 years experience in managing mining operations in Latin America that include base metal and gold deposits, underground and open pit mines, gold and base metal processing plants and smelting and refining operations. Mr. Harris currently serves on the boards of Correinte Resources, Inc., Canarc Resources Corp., Cardero Resources Corp., Endeavour Gold Corp., Sulliden Exploration Inc., Alomos Gold, Inc. and Veneroso & Associates. He is a 1949 graduate metallurgist of The Mount Morgan School of Mines (Australia).

Daniel Leonard

(67) has been a director since June 1999. Prior to his retirement in 1999, Mr. Leonard served as Senior Vice President of INVESCO, an international financial services firm, for 24 years where he managed funds including INVESCO's Strategic Growth Portfolio. Before joining INVESCO, Mr. Leonard was associated with Hanover Bank, Central Carolina Bank and Heritage Research Corporation. Mr. Leonard has a B.A. degree from Washington & Lee University and attended the New York University Graduate School of Business.

Board of Directors

The Company's bylaws authorize a board of directors consisting of not less than three, nor more than nine, with the exact number of directors being a number that may be determined from time to time by resolution of our Board of Directors. Our Directors are elected to hold office until the next annual shareholder meeting, until his successor has been elected and qualified, or until his death, resignation or removal.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee. Our Board may establish other committees from time to time as deem necessary to facilitate management of our business.

Our audit committee currently consists of Messrs. Hainey, Harris and Leonard, with Mr. Leonard acting as Chairman. The audit committee selects the independent auditors, reviews the plan, scope and results of the annual audit and reviews the controls or our business and financial management policies with our independent auditors. All of the members of our audit committee are non-employee directors. We adopted the Solitario Resources Board of Directors Audit Committee Charter (the "Charter") on October 29, 2003. In accordance with the Charter, our Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the audit committee are independent. Mr. Leonard is considered a financial expert as a result of his 24 years of experience as a fund manager and financial analyst.

We do not have a formal nominating committee. We operate in a specific segment of mining, exploration and geology, in which our current directors have extensive experience. The board of directors has determined that with the experience of the current directors and our limited resources, it is not in the Company's best interest to expend the resources or time and energy of the board of directors to form a formal nominating committee. If a qualified candidate for director comes to the attention of the board of directors, the entire board will consider such candidate for nomination and such candidate will be nominated for election as a director if such candidate is supported by a majority of the board of directors.

Pursuant to Article II Section 11 of our Bylaws, candidates for election as directors at any meeting of shareholders may be made (a) by, or at the direction of, a majority of the board of directors or (b) by any shareholder entitled to vote at such a meeting. In order to qualify for consideration at a shareholder meeting, shareholder nominations must be in writing addressed to the Secretary of Solitario Resources Corporation not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of a scheduled shareholders' meeting; provided, however, that if less than 70 days notice or prior public disclosure of the scheduled date of such a meeting is given or made, notice of a shareholder nomination must be delivered or received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the scheduled meeting was mailed or the day on which such public disclosure was made.

Such shareholder's notice shall set forth (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director and as to the shareholder giving the notice (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by such person of the date of such shareholder notice and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies with respect to nominees for election as directors, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (b) as to the shareholder giving the notice (i) the name and address, as they appear on the Company's books, of such shareholder and any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such nominees and (ii) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by such shareholder on the date of such shareholder notice and by any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such nominees on the date of such shareholder notice.

The board of directors may reject any shareholder nomination not timely made in accordance with the requirements of Article II Section 11 of Solitario's Bylaws. Furthermore, if the board of directors determines that the information provided in a shareholder's notice does not satisfy the informational requirements of Article II Section 11 of the Bylaws in any material respect, the Secretary will promptly notify such shareholder of the deficiency in the notice. The shareholder will then have an opportunity to cure the deficiency by providing additional information to the Secretary within such period of time, not to exceed 5 days from the date such deficiency notice is given to the shareholder, as the board of directors shall reasonably determine. If the deficiency is not cured within such time period, or if the board of directors reasonably determines that the additional information provided by the shareholder, together with information previously provided, does not satisfy the requirements of Article II Section 11 of the Company's Bylaws in any material respect, then the board of directors may reject such shareholder's nomination. The Secretary of the Company shall notify a shareholder in writing whether his or her nomination has been made in accordance with the time and information requirements of the Company's Bylaws. Notwithstanding the procedure set forth above, if the board of directors does not make a determination as to the validity of any shareholder nominations, the presiding officer of the meeting of the shareholders shall determine and declare at the meeting whether a nomination was made in accordance with the terms of the Company's Bylaws and shall accept or reject the nomination accordingly.

Compensation

Compensation of Directors

Other than options granted pursuant to the Solitario Resources Corporation's 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), our Directors have not been compensated in their capacities as Directors for us during the most recently completed fiscal year.

The following table sets forth stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2003 to each of the Directors. Options granted to Directors are not subject to vesting provisions. The exchange rate between US and Canadian dollars is as of the grant date.

Name | Securities under options granted (#) | Exercise or base price ($/Security) | Market value of securities underlying the options on the date of grant ($/Security) | Expiration Date
Leonard Harris | 60,000 | $0.59/Cdn$0.81 | $0.59/Cdn$0.81 | 14-Aug-2008

Executive Compensation

Our current policy is to pay no cash compensation to our executive officers for their services to us. Our executive officers have been paid by Crown, whose subsidiary, CRCC is reimbursed pursuant to the Management Agreement between CRCC and us. Subsequent to the spin-off, and assuming the completion of the acquisition of Crown by Kinross, we anticipate that we will terminate the Management Agreement and offer our executive officers compensation packages similar to those currently in effect with Crown. The following table summarizes the compensation paid by Crown to our executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Other Annual Compensation
Christopher E. Herald, CEO | 2003 | $145,000 | $7,000 | $ 5,000
Mark Jones, Vice Chairman | 2003 | $ 98,000 | $5,000 | $ 6,000
James R. Maronick, CFO | 2003 | $100,000 | $5,000 | $ 6,000
Walter W. Hunt, VP Operations | 2003 | $ 88,000 | $4,000 | $12,000

Summary Compensation Table

| Annual Compensation | Long-Term Compensation
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Other Annual Compensation | Awards Securities Under Options/ SAR's Granted (#) | Payouts Restricted Shares or Restricted Share Units ($) | All LTIP Payouts ($) | All Other Compensation
Christopher E. Herald, CEO | 2003 | NONE | NONE | NONE | NONE | NONE | NONE | NONE
| 2002 | NONE | NONE | NONE | 185,000 | NONE | NONE | NONE
| 2001 | NONE | NONE | NONE | 160,000 | NONE | NONE | NONE

Option Grants during the Most Recently Completed Fiscal Year

The following table sets forth stock options granted during the most recently completed fiscal year to our Chief Executive Officer.

Name | Securities under options granted (#) | % of total options granted to employees in fiscal year | Exercise or base price ($/security) | Expiration date | Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation For Option Term
5% | 10%
Christopher E. Herald, CEO | NONE | 0% | N/A | N/a | N/A | N/A

Aggregated Option Exercises during the Most Recently Completed Fiscal and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

The following table sets forth details of all exercises of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2003 by our Chief Executive Officer and the financial year-end value of unexercised options on an aggregated basis.

Name | Securities Acquired on exercise (#) | Value realized ($) | Unexercised options at fiscal year-end (#) Exercisable / Unexercisable | Value of unexercised in-the-money options at fiscal year-end (Cdn$) Exercisable / Unexercisable
Christopher E. Herald | N/A | N/A | 558,000 / 0 | Cdn$451,000/ 0

Management Contracts

Currently, all members of our executive management have contracts with Crown. We have no contracts with any members of our executive management

Indemnification of Directors

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to the fullest extent permitted by Colorado law as now or hereafter in effect, to indemnify any Director of Solitario. The Board of Directors shall be entitled to determine the terms of such indemnification, including advance of expenses, and to give effect thereto through the adoption of Bylaws, approval of agreements, or by any other manner approved by the Board of Directors. Any amendment to or repeal of the authorization of indemnification contained in our Articles of Incorporation shall not adversely affect any right of a Director of Solitario thereunder with respect to any right to indemnification that arises prior to such amendment

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

To our knowledge, no person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, voting securities carrying more than five percent of our issued and outstanding common stock with the exception of CRCC and Sprott Securities, which directly own 9,633,585 and 3,871,000 shares respectively, representing 38.7 percent and 15.5 percent, respectively of our issued and outstanding common stock. Effective with the spin-off, other than the Retained Shares, these shares will be distributed proportionally to Crown's shareholders.

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2004, the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by each of shareholders owning more than five percent, our Directors, each named executive officer and all of our executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons listed in the table below have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated.

|  | Prior to Spin-off |  | Subsequent to Spin-off
Name of Beneficial Owner |  | Amount and Nature of beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class |  | Amount and Nature of beneficial Ownership (15) | Percent of Class (15)
John Hainey, Director |  | 220,000 (4) | * |  | 220,000 (4) | *
Leonard Harris, Director |  | 256,000 (3) | 1.0% |  | 256,000 (3) | 1.0%
Christopher E. Herald, CEO and Director |  | 558,000 (1) | 2.1% |  | 747,013 (8) | 3.0%
Daniel Leonard, Director |  | 210,000 (4) | * |  | 210,000 (4) | *
Mark E. Jones, III, Director |  | 548,000 (2) | 2.1% |  | 585,280 (10) | 2.4%
James R. Maronick, CFO |  | 414,000 (5) | 1.6% |  | 527,369 (9) | 2.1%
Walter H. Hunt, VP Operations |  | 428,000 (6) | 1.6% |  | 534,514 (11) | 2.2%
All directors and executive officers as a group |  | 2,634,000 (7) | 9.5% |  | 3,080,177 (12) | 11.6%
Crown Resources Corporation 4251 Kipling St., Suite 390 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 |  | 9,633,585 | 37.5% |  | - | *
Sprott Securities, Inc Suite 3450 South Tower Royal Bank Plaza Toronto, ON M5J 2J2 |  | 3,871,000 | 15.1% |  | 3,871,000 | 15.9%
Zoloto Investors, LP 14701 St. Mary's Lane, suite 800 Houston, TX 77079 |  | - | * |  | 2,173,656 (13) | 8.9%
Steven A. Webster 14701 St. Mary's Lane, Suite 800 Houston, TX 77079 |  | - | * |  | 2,253,893 (14) | 9.2%

* Indicates holdings of less than 1%.

(1) Includes 413,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(2) Includes 345,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(3) Includes 226,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(4) Includes 210,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(5) Includes 344,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(6) Includes 348,000 shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(7) Includes the right to acquire 2,096,000 shares under options granted pursuant to the Plan.

(8) Includes (1) above and 181,074 of our shares from 850,000 Crown shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option plan and 7,939 of our shares from 37,268 Crown shares he owns.

(9) Includes (5) above and 113,905 of our shares from 530,000 Crown shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option Plan and 464 of our shares from 2,177 shares of Crown he owns.

(10) Includes (2) above and 18,640 of our shares from 87,500 Crown shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option Plan and 18,640 of our shares from 87,500 shares of Crown he owns.

(11) Includes (6) above and 106,514 of our shares from 500,000 Crown shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option Plan.

(12) Includes (7) above and 419,133 of our shares from 1,967,500 Crown shares granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option plan and 27,043 of our shares from 126,945 Crown shares owned.

(13) Includes 2,173,656 of our shares from (i) 768,375 Crown shares owned and from (ii) assumed conversion of Crown debt into 5,714,286 Crown shares and (iii) the assumed exercise of 5,714,286 Crown warrants on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share for 3,817,952 Crown shares.

(14) Includes 47,931 of our shares from 225,000 Crown shares that he has the right to acquire under options granted pursuant to Crown's 2002 option plan and 32,305 of our shares from 151,647 shares of Crown he owns and 2,173,656 shares beneficially owned by Zoloto, of which Mr. Webster is the sole member of the general partner.

(15) Assumes the conversion of all Crown convertible debt, the exercise of all Crown warrants on a cashless basis at the market price of Crown common stock on March 31, 2004, of $2.26 per share, and the retirement of our shares received by us in the spin-off.

Changes in Control

Crown (through its wholly-owned subsidiary, CRCC) will no longer own 37.5% of our outstanding common stock after completion of the spin-off. If the Kinross merger is completed as planned, Steven Webster, primarily through his deemed ownership of our shares held by Zoloto, will own 9.9% of our outstanding shares. We do not anticipate any other holders, including Sprott Securities Inc., will exercise any significant control over us after the spin-off and completion of the Kinross merger.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Our authorized capital consists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of March 31, 2004 there were 25,700,142 outstanding shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Below is a summary description of the material provisions of our capital stock:

Common stock

We are authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock. All the issued and outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Each outstanding share of common stock has one vote on all matters requiring a vote of the stockholders. There is no right to cumulative voting; thus, the holders of fifty percent or more of the shares outstanding can, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors. In the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, all shareholders are entitled to a pro rata distribution after payment of liabilities and after provision has been made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. The holders of the common stock have no preemptive rights with respect to our offerings of shares of our common stock. Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends if, as and when declared by the Board out of the funds legally available therefore. It is our present intention to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business. Dividends are, therefore, unlikely in the foreseeable future.

Preferred stock

Pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation, our Board is authorized to issue, without any action on the part of our shareholders, up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which no shares have been designated or issued. The Board has authority to divide the blank check preferred stock into one or more series and has broad authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences, including the voting rights of the shares of each series. The preferred stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company or be used to resist takeover offers opposed by the management. For instance, the Board could create impediments to or frustrate persons seeking to take us over or otherwise gain control of us by causing shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights to be issued to a holder or holders who might side with the Board in opposing a takeover bid that the Board determines not to be in our best interest. In addition, our ability to issue shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights might be considered a threat to dilute the stock ownership that might be acquired by a person or entity that might consider making a takeover bid. We have no plans at this time to issue any shares of preferred stock, and have no knowledge of any person or entity considering a takeover bid.

Transfer agent

The Transfer Agent and Registrar for all the outstanding stock of the Company is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 9th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1, telephone (800) 564-6253.

Exchange

Currently our shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol SLR. There is no current trading market for our stock in the United States. After the spin-off, we anticipate that our stock will also be traded in the United States on the OTC Bulletin Board.

INDEX TO SOLITARIO RESOURCE CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

|  | Page
Consolidated Financial Statements |
| Independent Auditors' Report | F-2
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 (as restated) | F-3
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 (as restated) and 2001(as restated) | F-4
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 (as restated) and 2001(as restated) | F-5
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 (as restated) and 2001(as restated) | F-6
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (as restated) | F-7

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Solitario Resources Corporation

Wheat Ridge, Colorado

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Solitario Resources Corporation and subsidiaries (Solitario) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of Solitario's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Solitario as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 includes net mineral interests costs of $2,760,000. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements emphasizes that the recovery of these costs is ultimately dependent upon either the sale of these mineral interests or the development of economically recoverable ore reserves, the ability of Solitario to obtain the necessary permits and financing to successfully place the projects into production, and upon future profitable operations.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2002 Solitario adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142.

As discussed in Note 10, the accompanying 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements have been restated.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 10, 2004

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands except share and per share amounts) | December 31, | December 31,
| 2003 | 2002
Assets |  | (As restated, see Note 10)
Current assets: |  |
Cash and cash equivalents | $1,273 | $1,405
Note receivable | 112 | 111
Investments in marketable equity securities, at fair value | 2,576 | 409
Prepaid expenses and other | 32 | 27
Total current assets | 3,993 | 1,952
Mineral interests, net | 2,760 | 3,216
Note receivable from Crown Resources Corporation, net of Discount | 937 | 915
Investment in Crown Resources Corporation warrant, at fair value | 5,591 | 153
Other assets | 7 | 140
Total assets | $13,288 | $6,376
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |  |
Current liabilities: |  |
Accounts payable | $ 53 | $ 26
Due to Crown Resources Corporation | 25 | 73
Deferred income taxes | 685 | -
Total current liabilities | 763 | 99
Deferred income taxes | 591 | -
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2, 3, and 6) |  |
Stockholders' equity: |  |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares (none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002) | - | -
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized, 50,000,000 shares (24,923,134 and 24,407,134 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively) | 249 | 234
Additional paid-in capital | 22,498 | 21,189
Accumulated deficit | (11,968) | (15,322)
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 1,155 | 176
Total stockholders' equity | 11,934 | 6,277
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ 13,288 | $ 6,376

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands except per share amounts) | For the year ended December 31,
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001
|  | (As restated, see Note 10) | (As restated, see Note 10)
Costs, expenses and other: |  |  |
Exploration expense | $ 418 | $ 957 | $ 1,477
Depreciation and amortization | 488 | 504 | 49
General and administrative | 404 | 372 | 511
Management fees | 351 | 449 | 590
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative Instruments | (5,438) | (105) | 63
Asset write-downs | 26 | - | 1,274
Loss on sale of assets | - | 39 | -
Interest and other (net) | (272 ) | (137 ) | (231 )
Income (loss) before income taxes | 4,023 | (2,079) | (3,733)
Income tax expense | 669 | - | -
Net income (loss) | $3,354 | $(2,079) | $(3,733)
Earnings (loss) per common share: Basic Diluted | $ 0.14 $ 0.14 | $(0.09) $(0.09) | $(0.16) $(0.16)
Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic Diluted | 23,638 23,638 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,387 23,387

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001

(in thousands, except |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |
share amounts) |  |  | Additional |  | Other |
| Common Stock | Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive |
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income (loss) | Total
Balance at December 31, 2000 | 23,344,647 | $234 | $21,147 | $(9,510) | $(62) | $11,809
Shares issued: |  |  |  |  |  |
For mineral interests | 62,487 | - | 42 | - | - | 42
Comprehensive loss: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net loss (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | (3,733) | - | (3,733)
Net unrealized loss on marketable equity securities (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | - | (134 ) | (134 )
Comprehensive loss (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | - | - | (3,867)
Balance at December 31, 2001(as restated, see Note 10) | 23,407,134 | 234 | 21,189 | (13,243) | (196) | 7,984
Comprehensive loss: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net loss (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | (2,079) | - | (2,079)
Net unrealized gain on marketable equity securities (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | - | 372 | 372
Comprehensive loss (as restated, see Note 10) | - | - | - | - | - | (1,707)
Balance at December 31, 2002 (as restated, see Note 10) | 23,407,134 | 234 | 21,189 | (15,322) | 176 | 6,277
Shares issued: |  |  |  |  |  |
Option exercise | 16,000 | - | 14 | - | - | 14
Private placement, net | 1,500,000 | 15 | 1,295 | - | - | 1,310
Comprehensive income: |  |  |  |  |  |
Net income | - | - | - | 3,354 | - | 3,354
Net unrealized gain on marketable equity securities (net of tax of $607) | - | - | - | - | 979 | 979
Comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | 4,333
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 24,923,134 | $249 | $22,498 | $(11,968) | $ 1,155 | $11,934

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands) | For the year ended December 31,
| 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Operating activities: |  | (As restated, see Note 10) | (As restated, see Note 10)
Net income (loss) | $3,354 | $(2,079) | $(3,733)
Adjustments: |  |  |
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments | (5,438) | (105) | 63
Depreciation and amortization | 488 | 504 | 49
Asset write-downs | - | - | 1,274
Loss on asset sales | - | 39 | -
Interest income received in stock | (207) | (74) | -
Interest income from amortization of note discount | (22) | (22) | (4)
Deferred income taxes | 669 | - | -
Other | 26 | - | 2
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |  |  |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (6) | 40 | (34)
Accounts payable | 27 | (18) | (26)
Due to Crown Resources Corporation | (48) | 11 | (19 )
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,157 ) | (1,704 ) | (2,428 )
Investing activities: |  |  |
Investment in Crown Resources Corporation promissory notes and warrants | (400) | - | (1,000)
Additions to mineral interests and other | (10) | - | (39)
Proceeds from asset sales | - | 26 | -
Proceeds from sale of marketable equity securities | - | 381 | 13
Collection on note receivable | 111 | 109 | 106
Purchase of marketable equity securities | - | (130) | (200)
Other assets | - | - | (63 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (299 ) | 386 | (1,183 )
Financing activities: |  |  |
Issuance of common stock | 1,324 | - | -
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,324 | - | -
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (132) | (1,318) | (3,611)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 1,405 | 2,723 | 6,334
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ 1,273 | $ 1,405 | $2,723
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |  |  |
Issuance of common stock for mineral properties | - | - | 42
Conversion of Crown notes receivable to shares of Crown common stock | 400 | - | -

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (As restated)

1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Business and company formation

Solitario Resources Corporation ("Solitario") engages principally in the acquisition and exploration of mineral interests. At December 31, 2003, Solitario's mineral interests are located in Brazil, Bolivia and Peru. In February 2004, Solitario acquired the CC project in the state of Nevada. Solitario was incorporated in the state of Colorado on November 15, 1984 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown Resource Corp. of Colorado ("CRCC"). CRCC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Resources Corporation ("Crown"). As a result of the issuance of shares subsequent to 1984, CRCC's ownership of Solitario's shares was reduced to 38.7% as of December 31, 2003; see Note 8.

On November 8, 2003 Crown announced that it would be distributing to its shareholders (through CRCC) its holdings of 9,633,585 shares of Solitario's common stock. When Solitario sold shares in a Canadian public offering in 1994, the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") required that the issued and outstanding shares of Solitario held by CRCC be held in escrow (the "Escrow Agreement") to, among other things, prevent CRCC from selling too large a volume of Solitario shares shortly after the public offering. Over the next three years sixty percent of the shares held in escrow were released to CRCC pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. On December 29, 2003, as required by the TSX, Solitario's disinterested shareholders (which excluded Solitario's officers, directors and Crown) voted to approve the release of the remaining 3,140,162 shares of Solitario held in escrow. The shares were released from escrow on January 15, 2004.

Financial reporting

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Solitario and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("generally accepted accounting principles"), and are expressed in US dollars.

In performing its activities, Solitario has incurred certain costs for land and leasehold interests. The recovery of these costs is ultimately dependent upon either the sale of mineral interests or the development of economically recoverable ore reserves, the ability of Solitario to obtain the necessary permits and financing to successfully place the properties into production, and upon future profitable operations, none of which is assured.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of the more significant estimates included in the preparation of Solitario's financial statements pertain to the valuation of mineral interests, mineral interest lives and residual values of mineral interests.

Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents include investments in highly-liquid debt securities with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Note receivable

Note receivable at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consists of $100,000 and $200,000, respectively, plus interest, issued by Newmont Mining Company and due Solitario in April 2004, pending the release of certain contingent liabilities.

Mineral interests

On January 1, 2002, Solitario adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which, among other things, required the reclassification of Solitario's mineral properties as mineral interests (intangible assets) and the amortization of those assets over their expected useful lives. Solitario's mineral interests represent mineral use rights for parcels of land not owned by Solitario. Solitario's mineral interests relate to exploration stage properties and the value of such intangible assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of economic minerals believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. At January 1, 2002, Solitario reclassified $3,680,000 from mineral properties to mineral interests.

The excess of the cost of each mineral interest over its estimated residual value is amortized over the lesser of (i) the term of any mineral interest option or lease or (ii) the estimated life of the mineral interest, which approximates Solitario's estimated exploration cycle. Solitario is amortizing its mineral interests over a three-to-eight year period based upon facts and circumstances for each mineral interest on a property-by-property basis including Solitario's current intentions for the property and Solitario's history with similar properties. Solitario has estimated the residual values for its mineral interests to be zero at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Solitario recorded $466,000 and $464,000 of amortization of its mineral interests for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As of December 31, 2003 Solitario estimates its amortization of intangible assets relating to mineral interests will approximate the following for the next five years:

Estimated AmortizationExpense
2004 | $466,000
2005 | 466,000
2006 | 466,000
2007 | 455,000
2008 | 453,000

Solitario expenses all exploration costs incurred on its mineral interests, other than acquisition costs, prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves. Solitario regularly performs evaluations of its investment in mineral interests to assess the recoverability and or the residual value of its investments in these assets. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances change which indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, utilizing established guidelines based upon discounted future net cash flows from the asset or upon the determination that certain exploration properties do not have sufficient potential for economic mineralization. There were no mineral interest impairments in 2003, 2002 or 2001.

Solitario's net capitalized mineral interests of $2,760,000 and $3,216,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to gross land, leasehold and acquisition costs of $3,690,000 and $3,680,000, at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, less accumulated amortization of $930,000 and $464,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Solitario has not yet identified any proven and probable reserves related to its mineral interests. The recoverability of these costs is dependent on, among other things, the successful identification of proven and probable reserves, as well as the potential to develop, sell or joint venture its interests in the properties.

Derivative instruments

Solitario's Crown warrants, which entitle Solitario the right to purchase Crown common stock, have a net settlement feature and accordingly Solitario classifies the Crown warrants as derivative instruments. Solitario has recorded its investment in these warrants at their estimated fair value, based upon quoted prices of $5,591,000 and $153,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Solitario recognizes any increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants as a gain or loss on derivative instruments in the statement of operations. Solitario recorded an increase in the fair value of the warrants of $5,438,000 and $106,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, compared to a decrease of $63,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Marketable equity securities

Solitario's investment in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, which is based upon market quotes of the underlying securities. The fair value of Solitario's 965,491 shares of Crown common stock was $2,433,000 at December 31, 2003. The cost of marketable equity securities sold is determined by the specific identification method. Changes in market value are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders' equity, unless a decline in market value is considered other than temporary, in which case the decline is recognized as a loss in the statement of operations. At December 31, 2003, there are no unrealized holding losses in Solitario's marketable equity securities.

The following table represents changes in marketable equity securities.

Sales of marketable equity securities

| 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Gross proceeds | $ - | $381,000 | $ 13,000
Cost | - | 433,000 | 18,000
Gross gain on sale included in earnings during the period | - | 54,000 | -
Gross loss on sale included in earnings during the period | - | (106,000) | (5,000)
Write down of marketable equity securities | (26,000) | - | -
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period included in other comprehensive income, net of tax | 953,000 | 320,000 | (139,000)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in earnings during the period, net of tax | $ 26,000 | $ 52,000 | $ 5,000

Foreign exchange

The United States dollar is the functional currency for all of Solitario's foreign subsidiaries. Although Solitario's exploration activities have been conducted primarily in Brazil, Bolivia and Peru, payments under substantially all of the land, leasehold, and exploration agreements of Solitario are denominated in United States dollars. Solitario expects that a significant portion of its required and discretionary expenditures in the foreseeable future will also be denominated in United States dollars. Foreign currency gains and losses are included in the results of operations in the period in which they occur.

Income taxes

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to certain income and expenses recognized in different periods for financial and income tax reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred taxes are also recognized for operating losses and tax credits that are available to offset future taxable income and income taxes, respectively. A valuation allowance is provided, if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Earnings per share

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, 3,488,000, 3,372,000 and 2,282,000 potentially dilutive common shares related to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effects were anti-dilutive.

Employee stock compensation plans

Solitario follows Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" to account for its stock based employee compensation plans. Under Solitario's stock option plans, the exercise price of stock options issued to employees equals the quoted market price of the stock on the grant date. As a result of repricing of its options in 1999, Solitario accounts for all grants which have been repriced as variable awards and records increases and decreases in compensation expense during the period based upon changes in the quoted market price of Solitario's stock as required by APB Opinion No. 25.

Pro forma information has been computed as if Solitario had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The fair values of these options were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively: risk-free interest rate of 3.31%, 4.34% and 4.74%; dividend yield of 0 percent; volatility factor of the expected market price of Solitario's common stock of 65%, 60% and 65%; and a weighted average expected life of the options of 3.9, 4.3 years and 4.4. The weighted average fair value of the options granted is estimated at $0.28, $0.25 and $0.34 per share in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Had Solitario accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, the following results would have been reported:

(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Net income (loss), as reported | $3,354 | $(2,079) | $(3,733)
Deduct total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all rewards, net of related tax effects | 54 | 232 | 325
Pro forma net income (loss) | $3,300 | $(2,378) | $(4,058)
Earnings (loss) per share: |  |  |
Basic and diluted as reported | $ 0.14 | $ (0.09) | $ (0.16)
Basic and diluted pro forma | $ 0.14 | $ (0.10) | $ (0.17)

Segment reporting

Solitario operates in one segment, minerals exploration. At December 31, 2003, all of Solitario's operations are located in South America as further described in Note 2 to these financial statements.

Included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 are total assets of $2,797,000 related to Solitario's foreign operations. Assets totaling $2,789,000 are located in South America in Brazil and Peru. Assets totaling $8,000 are located in Canada.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 149 "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" to amend and clarify financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The changes in this statement are intended to improve financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly to achieve more consistent reporting of contracts as either derivative or hybrid instruments. SFAS No.149 has been adopted by Solitario and will be applied prospectively for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had a material effect on Solitario's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150 "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity", which clarifies the classification as liabilities for certain financial instruments including equity shares that are mandatorily redeemable, or a financial instrument other than equity shares that has an obligation to repurchase the instrument with equity shares, including a conditional obligation to settle the financial instrument with equity shares. SFAS No. 150 has been adopted by Solitario and is effective for financial instruments entered into after May 31, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had a material effect on Solitario's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

On January 1, 2002, Solitario adopted SFAS No. 142, which among other things required the reclassification of Solitario's Mineral Properties as Mineral Interest (intangible assets) and the amortization of those assets over their expected useful lives. The excess of the cost of each mineral interest over its estimated residual value is amortized over the lesser of (i) the term of any mineral interest option or lease or (ii) the estimated life of the mineral interest, which approximates Solitario's estimated exploration cycle. Solitario is amortizing its mineral interests over a three-to-eight year period based upon facts and circumstances for each mineral interest on a property-by-property basis including Solitario's current intentions for the property and Solitario's history with similar properties. Solitario has estimated the residual values for its mineral interests to be zero at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Beginning January 1, 2002, Solitario reclassified its mineral properties to intangible assets, mineral interests, and began amortizing the excess cost over residual value, which resulted in $466,000 and $464,000 of amortization on mineral interests for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Solitario did not amortize any mineral interest costs in 2001.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Recission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections". SFAS No. 145 eliminates inconsistencies between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications. This statement requires that gains and losses from debt extinguishment should be classified as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria of APB Opinion No. 30. This Statement also amends existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their meanings under changed conditions. Solitario adopted SFAS No. 145 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of this Statement has not had any effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities", which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with these activities and generally requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity shall be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. SFAS No 146 does not apply to costs associated with the retirement of long-lived assets covered by SFAS No. 143. The adoption of this Statement has not had any effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations. The adoption of this statement has not had any effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations.

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". Under SFAS No. 143, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation covered under the scope of SFAS No. 143 is recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability would be accreted to its present value, and the capitalized cost would be depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity would either settle the obligation for its recorded amount or incur a gain or loss upon settlement. We have adopted SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of this statement has not had any effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 clarifies the disclosure required by guarantors of (a) the nature of any guarantee, (b) maximum potential amount of future payments associated therewith, (c) carrying amounts of liabilities, if any, related to the guarantor's obligations under the guarantee and (d) the nature and extent of any recourse or collateral for recovery of any amounts paid under the guarantee. FIN 45 also clarifies the requirement to recognize at the inception of a guarantee a liability for the fair value of obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantee, including the obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of guarantee. Solitario has applied the provisions of FIN 45 for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002 and the effect of adopting this interpretation was not material.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46") and in December 2003 issued FIN 46R. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of variable interest entities which have one or both of the following attributes (1) the equity investment at risk in not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties which is provided by other parties that will absorb some or all of the expected losses of the entity, (2) the equity investors lack controlling financial interest as evidenced by (i) the ability to make decisions regarding the entity's activities through voting or similar rights (ii) the obligation to absorb expected losses, which make it possible for the entity to finance its activities and (iii) the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur, which is the compensation for absorbing the expected losses. FIN 46 was immediately effective for variable interest entities formed after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R requires the adoption of either FIN46 or FIN46R in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application for all other types of variable interest entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R is not expected to have a material effect on Solitario's financial position or results of operations.

2. Mineral interests:

Solitario classifies as intangible assets mineral interests related to mineral use rights for parcels of land not owned by Solitario. Solitario's mineral use rights relate to exploration stage properties, and the value of such intangible assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineral interests believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. The amounts capitalized as mineral interests include concession and lease or option acquisition costs. Capitalized costs related to a mineral interest represent its fair value at the time it was acquired, either as an individual asset purchase or as a part of a business combination. Solitario has no production (operating) or development stage mineral interests in properties that contain proven or probable reserves. Solitario's exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that Solitario believes to potentially contain greenfields exploration potential that is not associated with any other production or development stage property. Solitario's mineral use rights generally are enforceable regardless of whether proven and probable reserves have been established.

The following represents Solitario's investment in mineral interests:

(in thousands) | December 31,
| 2003 | 2002
Mineral interests | $3,690 | $3,680
Accumulated amortization | (930 ) | (464 )
Net mineral interests | $2,760 | $3,216

As discussed in Note 1, the amortization of mineral interests commenced January 1, 2002, upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

Peru

Solitario holds exploration concessions or has filed applications for concessions covering approximately 23,200 hectares in Peru. These applications are subject to normal administrative approvals and the mineral interests are subject to an annual rental of $3.00 per hectare (approximately 2.477 acres per hectare) in June of each year.

Bongará

Solitario acquired the initial Bongará exploration concessions in 1993. The current holdings consist of concessions covering approximately 6,500 hectares in northern Peru (the "Bongará project").

In December 1996, Solitario signed an agreement regarding the Bongará project with a subsidiary of Cominco Ltd. ("Cominco") of Vancouver, B.C., Canada. After a modification signed in 1999, Cominco had the right to earn a 65% interest in the Bongará project by spending a minimum of $17,000,000 over a five-year period. In February 2001 Cominco terminated its option to acquire an interest in the Bongará project. Solitario currently holds a 100% interest in the project and may seek a new joint venture partner to explore and develop the project.

Yanacocha

On April 26, 2000 Solitario completed a transaction with an affiliate of Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") and sold its interest in its Yanacocha project for $6 million and a sliding scale net smelter return royalty ("NSR") that varies with the price of gold. Newmont retained $400,000 of the $6 million purchase price to be paid in four annual installments plus interest pending release of certain contingent liabilities. Solitario received the first three payments of $111,000, $109,000 and $106,000 (including interest) in April 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Solitario recorded a gain on the sale of the Yanacocha project of $5.8 million during the second quarter of 2000. The NSR royalty applies to exploration concessions covering approximately 60,000 hectares.

La Pampa

Solitario holds concessions comprising approximately 3,400 hectares on the La Pampa exploration project. In July 2002, Solitario signed an agreement with Bear Creek Mining Company ("Bear Creek") whereby Bear Creek was entitled to earn a 51% interest in the La Pampa project by expending $4.5 million on exploration of La Pampa over a five-year period. As part of the agreement, Bear Creek was required to pay all costs to maintain the concessions and complete a minimum of 1,000 meters of drilling on the property and could earn an additional 14% interest (for a total of 65%) by completing a bankable feasibility study on the property within two years of earning its 51% interest. In February 2004, Bear Creek notified us that it intends to terminate its option to earn an interest in the La Pampa project. Solitario will review Bear Creek's technical data to determine its future course of action. Solitario has no capitalized costs related to La Pampa as of December 31, 2003.

Other Peruvian properties

Solitario holds concessions comprising approximately 1,800 hectares on the Sapalache exploration project. Solitario intends to conduct limited exploration activities while it seeks a joint venture partner to explore and develop this project.

Brazil

Pedra Branca

Solitario acquired the Pedra Branca platinum-palladium (PGM) Project located in Ceará State, Brazil, as part of its acquisition of Altoro Gold Corp., ("Altoro") in October 2000. Altoro signed an agreement in May of 1999 with Eldorado Gold Corporation ("Eldorado") whereby Solitario could have earned a 70% interest in concessions covering approximately 10,000 hectares, by spending $2 million on exploration over three years. With Eldorado's consent, Solitario elected to allow the concession to expire in October 2003. Solitario reacquired the concessions in November 2003 and assigned a 2% net smelter return royalty on the reacquired concessions. Additionally, Solitario controls concessions in its own name covering approximately 59,244 hectares for a total of 69,244 hectares at the Pedra Branca Project.

In February 2000, Altoro signed a letter of intent, which was subsequently assigned to Rockwell Ventures, Inc., of Vancouver, Canada ("Rockwell"), granting Rockwell an option to earn a 60% interest in Altoro's share of the Pedra Branca Project. Under the terms of the agreement, Rockwell was required to spend $7 million on exploration within four years from July 2000, with a minimum expenditure of $1 million during the first year. In addition, Rockwell issued to Solitario a total of 125,433 of its common shares and $50,000 in cash in May 2000 upon regulatory approval of the agreement. In June 2001, Rockwell terminated its option under the agreement. At December 31, 2002, Solitario owned 100% of the Pedra Branca project subject to the Eldorado Lease discussed above.

On January 28, 2003, Solitario entered into an agreement with Anglo Platinum whereby Anglo Platinum may earn a 51% interest in the Pedra Branca Project, by spending $7 million on exploration at Pedra Branca over a four-year period. Anglo Platinum agreed to a minimum expenditure of $500,000 during the first six months of the agreement. Anglo Platinum can earn an additional 9% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 60%) by completing a bankable feasibility study. Anglo Platinum can also earn an additional 5% interest in Pedra Branca (for a total of 65%) by arranging for financing to put the project into commercial production.

In October 2000, Solitario recorded $3,627,000 in mineral interest additions for the Pedra Branca project in connection with the acquisition of Altoro.

Tocantinzinho

In November 1998 Altoro entered into an option agreement (subsequently modified) to acquire a 100% interest in the Tocantinzinho gold project in Brazil. The agreement covered concessions for approximately 10,000 acres located in the Para State in Brazil. Solitario terminated the agreement in December of 2001 and recorded a mineral interest write-down of $639,000.

Bolivia

Rincon del Tigre

Since April 1999 Altoro entered into a series of agreements that allow Solitario to earn a 100% interest in concessions covering 51,000 hectares at the Rincon del Tigre PGM project located in Santa Cruz State, Bolivia. In December 2001, Solitario terminated these agreements, made a cash payment to the owner of the Rincon del Tigre concessions of $35,000 and recorded a mineral interest write-down of $636,000.

Exploration costs

The following items comprised exploration expense:

(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Geologic, drilling and assay | $488 | $335 | $707
Field expenses | 237 | 214 | 243
Administrative | 150 | 408 | 514
Joint venture reimbursement | (457) | - | -
Total exploration costs | $418 | $957 | $1,464

3. Related party transactions:

Crown, through its wholly owned subsidiary, CRCC, owns 38.7% of Solitario common stock. Crown provides management and technical services to Solitario under a management and technical services agreement originally signed in April 1994 and modified in April 1999, December 2000 and July 2002. Under the modified agreement Solitario reimburses Crown for direct out-of-pocket expenses; payment of 25% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for executive and technical salaries, benefits and expenses; payment of 50% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for financial management and reporting salaries, benefits and expenses; and payment of 75% of Crown's corporate administrative costs for investor relations salaries, benefits and expenses. These allocations are based upon estimated time and expenses spent by Crown management and employees on Crown activities and Solitario's activities. Management believes these allocations are reasonable and the allocations are periodically reviewed by management and approved by independent Board members of both Crown and Solitario. Management service fees billed monthly are due on receipt and are generally paid within thirty days.

In October 2001, Solitario invested in two 10% convertible secured promissory notes, ("Senior Notes") totaling $1,000,000 of the $3,600,000 Senior Notes issued by Crown. The payment of the first Senior Note, (the "Solitario Note"), of $350,000 was made to Crown. The Solitario Note is convertible into shares of Crown common stock at $0.2916 per share. The funds for payment of the second Senior Note, of $650,000 were placed in escrow pending the outcome of the Crown's voluntary petition for bankruptcy, filed in United States Bankruptcy Court, which was filed on March 8, 2002 (the "Bankruptcy"). The $650,000 Senior Note is convertible into shares of Crown common stock at $0.35 per share. In March 2002 an additional $200,000 was advanced to Crown out of escrow of which Solitario's share of the advance was $56,000. Crown's plan of reorganization was confirmed on May 30, 2002 and the remaining balance of the proceeds plus interest was released to Crown on the effective date of the Bankruptcy, June 11, 2002. The independent board members of both Crown and Solitario approved the transaction. The terms of the transaction on the escrowed Senior Notes were the same as given to other senior lenders of Crown (the "Senior Lenders") and, with regard to the terms of the $350,000 Solitario Note, the terms were negotiated with and approved by the other Senior Lenders. Under the terms of the notes, interest at a 10% rate is payable quarterly in cash or Crown common stock at the election of Crown. During 2003 and 2002, Solitario was paid 249,718 and 182,440 Crown shares, respectively, as interest under the Senior and Subordinated B Notes.

As part of the investment in the Senior Notes, Solitario also received two warrants. The first warrant gives Solitario the right to purchase 1,857,143 shares of Crown common stock for $0.75 per share through October 2006. The second warrant gives Solitario the right to purchase 1,200,000 shares of Crown common stock at $0.60 per share through October 2006. The fair value of the warrants at the time of issuance, based upon a Black-Scholes valuation model of $110,000, was recorded as a discount to the Senior Notes. This discount is being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest income. Solitario recorded additional interest from the amortization of the discount of $22,000 for the each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 compared to $4,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The fair value of the warrants, based upon a quoted bid prices, was $5,591,000 and $153,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Solitario recognizes any increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants as a gain or loss on derivative instruments in the statement of operations. Solitario recorded an increase in the fair value of the warrants of $5,438,000 and $106,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, compared to a decrease of $63,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Solitario entered into a Voting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2002 among Zoloto Investors, LP ("Zoloto") and Crown. Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, Solitario and Zoloto (the "Signing Shareholders"), who are both stockholders of Crown, agreed that they will each vote their owned shares during the term of the Voting Agreement for the election of three designees of Zoloto and one designee of Solitario (the "Designee Directors") to the Board of Directors of Crown. The Signing Shareholders agreed that any shares received by either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the Voting Agreement during its term and any successor, assignee or transferee of shares from either Signing Shareholder would be subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement during its term. The Voting Agreement terminates on the third anniversary from the date of the first annual meeting of shareholders after the date of the Voting Agreement. As of December 31, 2003, the Signing Shareholders collectively held 1,733,866 shares or approximately 10.1% of the outstanding shares of Crown. As of December 31, 2003, Solitario owns 965,491 shares of Crown common stock, received as interest on its Senior Notes and the Subordinated B Notes, has warrants to acquire 3,057,143 shares of Crown common stock at between $0.60 and $0.75 per share and could also acquire up to 3,057,143 additional shares of Crown common stock through conversion of its Senior Notes.

On June 26, 2001, Solitario agreed to acquire 200,000 shares of Canyon Resources Corporation common stock from Crown at its fair market value of $200,000 at that date. Solitario sold the shares for $245,000 in February 2002, the fair market value at that date.

On February 21, 2003, Solitario invested $400,000 in Crown's 10% convertible subordinated promissory notes due 2006 Series B (The "Subordinated B Notes"). The Subordinated B Notes are convertible into common stock of Crown at $0.75 per share. The Subordinated B Notes pay interest at 10% in stock or cash at Crown's option, and mature on October 19, 2006, the same date as Crown's Senior Notes. On November 5, 2003 Solitario's Subordinated B Notes were automatically converted into 533,333 shares of Crown common stock. The conversion was in accordance with the terms of the Subordinated B note, which allowed for an automatic conversion if Crown's common stock traded above $1.75 per share for twenty consecutive trading days.

4. Income Taxes:

Solitario's income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following as allocated between foreign and United States components:

(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Deferred |  |  |
US | $ 2,207 | $286 | $(359)
Foreign | (164) | 159 | (312)
Operating loss and credit carryovers: |  |  |
US | (1,538) | (286) | 359
Foreign | 164 | (159 ) | 312
Income tax expense | $ 669 | $ - | $ -

Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes includes losses from foreign operations of $1,092,000, $1,622,000 and $3,071,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The net deferred tax assets/liabilities in the December 31, 2003 and 2002 balance sheets include the following components:

(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002
Deferred tax assets: |  |
Net operating loss (NOL) carryovers | $ 4,252 | $3,870
Capital loss carryovers | 21 | 622
Royalty | 1,560 | 1,560
Valuation allowance | (3,332 ) | (4,862 )
Total deferred tax assets | 2,501 | 1,190
Deferred tax liabilities: |  |
Unrealized gain on derivative securities | 2,823 | 17
Exploration costs | 921 | 1,085
Other | 33 | 88
Total deferred tax liabilities | 3,777 | 1,190
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ 1,276 | $ -

A reconciliation of expected federal income taxes on income (loss) from operations at statutory rates, with the expense (benefit) for income taxes is as follows:

(in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001
Expected income tax expense (benefit) | $ 1,368 | $ (707) | $ (1,269)
Non-deductible foreign expenses | (60) | 495 | 93
Foreign tax rate differences | 1 | (19) | (8)
State income tax | 338 | 17 | (79)
Expiration of loss carryovers | 542 | - | -
Change in valuation allowance | (1,530) | 212 | 1,251
Other | 10 | 2 | 12
Income tax expense | $ 669 | $ - | $ -

During 2003, Solitario recognized other comprehensive income related to unrealized gains of $1,544,000 on marketable equity securities that has been reduced by $607,000 for the income tax associated with those gains.

During 2003, the valuation allowance was reduced by $1,530,000 to reflect the projected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards for which no income tax benefit was previously provided. During 2002 and 2001 the valuation allowance was increased primarily as a result of increases in net operating loss carryforwards, for which it was more likely than not that the deferred tax benefit would not be realized.

At December 31, 2003, Solitario has unused US Net Operating Loss ("NOL") and capital loss carryovers of $3,998,000 and $53,000, respectively, which begin to expire commencing 2008 and 2004, respectively. Solitario also has foreign NOL carryovers at December 31, 2003 of $7,860,000 that begin to expire four years after the first year in which taxable income arises. In connection with the Bankruptcy of Crown and Solitario's acquisition of Altoro Gold Corp., Solitario had a greater than fifty percent change in ownership as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Pursuant to Section 382, the amount of future taxable income available to be offset by Solitario's carryovers is limited to approximately $614,000 per year.

5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

For certain of Solitario's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Solitario's marketable equity securities are carried at their estimated fair value based on quoted market prices.

The fair value of the Senior Notes is estimated to be $7,729,000 and $1,250,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The fair value of the Crown warrants was $5,591,000 and $153,000 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Solitario recognizes any increase or decrease in the fair value of the warrants as a gain or loss on derivative instruments in the statement of operations. Solitario recorded an increase in the fair value of the warrants of $5,438,000 and $106,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, compared to a decrease of $63,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.

The recorded value of cash and notes receivable approximate their fair value at December 31, 2003 and 2002.

6. Commitments and Contingencies:

In acquiring its interests in mineral claims and leases, Solitario has entered into lease agreements, which generally may be canceled at its option. Solitario is required to make minimum rental and option payments in order to maintain its interests in certain claims and leases. See Note 2. Solitario estimates its 2004 mineral property rental and option payments to be approximately $137,000. If Solitario's current joint venture partners elect to continue funding their respective joint ventures throughout the remainder of 2004, Solitario would be reimbursed for approximately $79,000 of those costs.

7. Stock Option Plan:

On March 4, 1994, Solitario's Board of Directors (the "Board") adopted the 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"). Up to 1,100,000 shares of Solitario's common stock were authorized for issuance under the Plan. The Board voted for, and shareholders approved, amendments that have increased the authorized shares under the Plan to 3,736,000 as of June 2002.

All options have been granted at exercise prices that are equal to the quoted market price of the stock on the grant date. The options expire five years from the date of grant, and are subject to certain vesting provisions, as determined by the Board.

The activity in the Plan for the three years ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:

| 2003 | 2002 | 2001
|  | Weighted |  | Weighted |  | Weighted
|  | Average |  | Average |  | Average
|  | Exercise |  | Exercise |  | Exercise
| Options | Price (Cdn$)1 | Options | Price (Cdn$)1 | Options | Price (Cdn$)1
Outstanding, beginning of year | 3,372,000 | 0.96 | 2,282,000 | 1.08 | 1,724,750 | 1.22
Granted | 192,500 | 0.77 | 1,140,000 | 0.73 | 980,000 | 0.94
Exercised | (16,000) | 1.16 | - | - | - | -
Expired | (60,000 ) | 1.16 | (50,000 ) | 1.16 | (422,750 ) | 1.31
Outstanding, end of year | 3,488,500 | 0.95 | 3,372,000 | 0.96 | 2,282,000 | 1.08
Exercisable, end of year | 3,019,125 | 0.97 | 2,742,000 | 1.00 | 1,812,500 | 1.10

(1) In March 1999, the shareholders of Solitario approved a repricing of existing options for current employees, officers and directors to Cdn$1.16 per share, which was the market price of Solitario's stock.

The options outstanding at December 31, 2003 have a range of exercise prices of between Cdn$1.30 and Cdn$0.65 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.03 years.

As a result of the repricing of existing options in 1999, Solitario began to account for the awards as variable as of July 1, 2000, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation (an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25)". Accordingly, an increase in the current market price of Solitario common stock above the higher of the option strike price and the market price of Solitario's common stock as of July 1, 2000, multiplied by options outstanding will be recorded as compensation expense over the vesting term of the options. A subsequent reduction in the current market price, to the extent of previously recorded compensation expense will be credited as a reduction of compensation expense. There was no compensation expense recorded during 2003, 2002 or 2001 as a result of variable accounting for the repriced options. As of December 31, 2003 all repriced options have expired.

The following table summarizes Solitario's stock options as of December 31, 2003:

Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable
Exercise price Cdn$ | Number | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | Weighted Average Exercise Price Cdn$ | Number Exercisable | Weighted Average Exercise Price Cdn$
$0.65 | 50,000 | 4.1 | $0.65 | 12,500 | $0.65
$0.73 | 1,140,000 | 2.2 | $0.73 | 875,000 | $0.73
$0.81 | 142,500 | 4.7 | $0.81 | 80,625 | $0.81
$0.94 | 980,000 | 1.2 | $0.94 | 882,500 | $0.94
$1.16 | 671,000 | 0.3 | $1.16 | 671,000 | $1.16
$1.19 to $1.22 | 395,000 | 0.4 | $1.22 | 395,000 | $1.22
$1.30 | 110,000 | 0.8 | $1.30 | 102,500 | $1.30
Total | 3,488,500 |  |  | 3,019,125 |

8. Stockholders' Equity:

On November 4, 2003, Solitario completed a private placement to certain Canadian based funds managed by Sprott Asset Management of Toronto, Ontario of 1,500,000 of Solitario common shares at a price of Cdn$1.20 per share for total proceeds of Cdn$1,800,000, or approximately $1,310,000, net of offering costs. The additional shares reduced Crown's interest in Solitario from 41.2% at December 31, 2002 to 38.7% as of December 31, 2003.

9. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):

(in thousands) | 2003 (1)
| March 31, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | Sept. 30, | Sept. 30, | Dec. 31,
| As previously reported | As restated | As previously reported | As restated | As previously reported | As restated |
Net income (loss) | $(126) | $ 370 | $(121) | $ 488 | $(222) | $ 603 | $ 1,893
Earnings (loss) per share: Basic Diluted | $(0.01) $(0.01) | $0.02 $0.02 | $(0.02) $(0.02) | $0.02 $0.02 | $(0.01) $(0.01) | $0.03 $0.03 | $0.08 $0.07
Weighted shares outstanding: Basic Diluted | 23,407 23,407 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,407 23,407 | 23,407 23,407 | 24,322 25,572

(in thousands) | 2002 (1)
| March 31, | March 31, | June 30, | June 30, | Sept. 30, | Sept. 30, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31,
| As Previously reported | As restated | As Previously reported | As restated | As Previously reported | As restated | As Previously reported | As restated
Net loss | $(483) | $(609) | $(430) | $(481) | $(442) | $(558) | $(315) | $(431)
Basic and diluted loss per share | $(0.02) | $(0.03) | $(0.02) | $(0.02) | $(0.02) | $(0.02) | $(0.01) | $(0.02)
Basic and diluted weighted shares outstanding | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407 | 23,407

(1) The operating results for each of the four quarters in the year ended December 31, 2002 and each of the three quarters during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 have been restated as discussed in Note 10.

10. Restatement

Subsequent to the issuance of its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, Solitario determined that it had not properly adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, that it had capitalized certain costs that should have been expensed as incurred and that Solitario's warrants to acquire Crown common stock should have been accounted for as derivative financial instruments.

Effective January 1, 2002, SFAS No. 142 requires mineral interests in the form of exploration concessions to be classified as intangible assets and amortized over their expected useful lives. In its previously issued 2002 financial statements Solitario had classified its mineral interests as mineral properties and had not recognized amortization on these interests.

In addition, Solitario had previously capitalized certain annual concession fees, taxes and other costs during 2001 and 2002 which should have been charged as exploration expense as incurred.

Solitario also did not previously record its investment in Crown warrants as derivative financial instruments during 2002 and 2001, and include changes in the fair value in income. In its previously issued 2002 and 2001 financial statements Solitario had accounted for the warrants as available for sale securities and the gains and losses were included in other comprehensive income.

Additionally, Solitario has reclassified its statement of operations to move non-operating gains and income out of revenue. Those amounts are now classified among costs, expenses and other.

As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 have been restated from the amounts previously reported. A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION

(in thousands except per share amounts) | Year ended December 31, 2002 | Year ended December 31, 2001
| As previously reported | As restated | As previously reported | As restated
Costs expenses and other: |  |  |  |
Exploration expense | 907 | 957 | 1,464 | 1,477
Depreciation and amortization | 40 | 504 | 49 | 49
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative Instruments | - | (105) | - | 63
Net loss | (1,670) | (2,079) | (3,657) | (3,733)
Loss per common share: Basic and diluted | $(0.07) | $(0.09) | $(0.16) | $(0.16)

BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

| As of December 31, 2002
(in thousands) | As previously reported | As restated
Assets |  |
Mineral property, net | $ 3,743 | $ -
Mineral interests, net | - | 3,216
Total Assets | 6,903 | 6,376
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |  |
Stockholders' equity: |  |
Accumulated deficit | (14,837) | (15,322)
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 218 | 176
Total stockholder's equity | $ 6,804 | $ 6,277