XML 53 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Business and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
1. Business and significant accounting policies

1.       Business and significant accounting policies

 

Business

 

           Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (“Solitario”) is a development stage company which is developing its Mt. Hamilton project located in Nevada. See “Recent Developments” below. In addition Solitario has a focus on the acquisition of precious and base metal properties with exploration potential and the development or purchase of royalty interests. In addition to its Mt. Hamilton project, Solitario acquires and holds a portfolio of exploration properties for future sale, joint venture or to create a royalty prior to the establishment of proven and probable reserves. Although Solitario intends to develop the Mt. Hamilton project, Solitario has never developed a mineral property. At September 30, 2012, Solitario's mineral properties are located in the United States, Mexico, Brazil and Peru.

 

          The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Solitario for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are unaudited and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. They do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements, but in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results, which may be achieved in the future or for the full year ending December 31, 2012.

 

          These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto which are included in Solitario’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The accounting policies set forth in those annual financial statements are the same as the accounting policies utilized in the preparation of these financial statements, except as modified for appropriate interim financial statement presentation.

Recent developments

Recent developments

 

Mt. Hamilton feasibility study

          In December 2010 Solitario signed the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Mt. Hamilton LLC, (the “MH Agreement”), and formed Mt. Hamilton LLC (“MH-LLC”), the owner of the Mt. Hamilton project. Solitario announced on February 22, 2012 the completion of a feasibility study on its Mt. Hamilton project (the “Feasibility Study”), prepared by SRK Consulting (US), Inc. of Lakewood, Colorado (“SRK”). As a result of the completion of the Feasibility Study, pursuant to the MH Agreement, Solitario earned an 80% interest in MH-LLC, became a development stage company (but not a company in the “Development Stage”) and reported mineral reserves at its Mt. Hamilton project. See Note 7, “Mineral Properties,” below.

 

RMB loan

          As explained in more detail in Note 4, Long term debt, Solitario entered into a Facility Agreement (the “Facility Agreement”) with RMB Australia Holdings Limited, an Australian corporation (“RMBAH”), and RMB Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RMBR”) whereby Solitario may borrow up to $5,000,000 from RMBAH (with any amounts outstanding collectively being the “RMB Loan”). Solitario borrowed $1,500,000 on August 21, 2012. Solitario paid an arrangement fee of $250,000 upon initial funding. The RMB Loan matures on the earlier to occur of (i) 36 months from the date of initial funding or (ii) the date on which financing is made available to MH-LLC for purposes of placing the Mt. Hamilton project into commercial production. The RMB Loan amounts will bear interest at LIBOR plus 5%, payable in arrears on the last day of each quarterly interest period. The RMB Loan may be repaid at any time without penalty. Any amounts repaid may not be redrawn under the Facility Agreement. The RMB Loan is secured by a lien on Solitario’s 80% interest in MH-LLC as well as a general security interest in Solitario’s remaining assets.

 

RMB warrants

          Pursuant to the Facility Agreement, Solitario issued 1,624,748 warrants (the “RMB Warrants”) to RMBAH as partial consideration for financing services provided in connection with the Facility Agreement. Each RMB Warrant entitles the holder


to purchase one common share (the “Warrant Shares”) of Solitario pursuant to the terms and conditions of the RMB Warrants. The RMB Warrants expire 36 months from their date of issuance and have an exercise price of $1.5387 per Warrant Share, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, Solitario registered the resale of the Warrant Shares with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Sandstorm royalty sale

          On June 11, 2012, MH-LLC completed the sale of a 2.4% net smelter returns royalty (“NSR”) on the Mt. Hamilton project to Sandstorm Gold, Ltd (“Sandstorm”) for US$10.0 million. MH-LLC received an upfront payment of US$6.0 million upon signing the agreement and will receive US$4.0 million on January 15, 2013, which Solitario has recorded as a current asset as of September 30, 2012. As part of the agreement, MH-LLC will have the option, for a period of 30 months from June 11, 2012 to repurchase up to 100% of the NSR for US$12 million, provided that MH-LLC enters into a gold stream agreement with Sandstorm that has an upfront deposit of greater than US$30 million. In addition, MH-LLC has provided Sandstorm with a right of first refusal on any future royalty or gold stream financing for the Mt. Hamilton project. Pursuant to the Agreement, Solitario is jointly and severally liable for all obligations of MH-LLC to Sandstorm. See Note 7, “Mineral Properties,” below for further discussion of the Sandstorm royalty sale.

 

Private placement to related parties

          On June 26, 2012, Christopher Herald, President and Chief Executive Officer of Solitario, and James Maronick, Chief Financial Officer of Solitario, agreed to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.22 per share, with Mr. Herald agreeing to purchase 180,000 shares and Mr. Maronick agreeing to purchase 45,000 shares. The purchase of the shares was unanimously approved by Solitario’s Board of Directors and was also unanimously approved by Solitario’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The price of the shares was the last closing price of Solitario’s common shares as quoted on the NYSE MKT (formerly NYSE Amex) on June 25, 2012. Solitario received total proceeds of $274,500.

Investment in Kinross

Investment in Kinross

 

          Solitario has a significant investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”), which consisted of the following at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

 

(in thousands)   9/30/2012    12/31/2011 
Shares   670    850 
Fair value          
  Current assets  $1,710   $4,361 
  Long term assets  $5,131   $5,329 
           

          Solitario did not sell any shares of Kinross during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, Solitario sold the following shares of Kinross:

 

(in thousands)  Nine months ended
September 30
   2012  2011
Shares sold   180    125 
Proceeds  $1,591   $1,964 
Gain on sale  $1,464   $1,870 

 

          As of September 30, 2012, Solitario has borrowed $394,000 in short-term margin loans, which are primarily secured by its investment in Kinross. The short-term margin loans are discussed below under “Short-term debt.” As of November 5, 2012, Solitario owns 670,000 shares of Kinross common stock which have a value of approximately $6.2 million based upon the market price of $9.22 per Kinross share. Solitario’s investment in Kinross common stock represents a significant concentration of assets, with the inherent risk that entails. Any significant fluctuation in the market value of Kinross common shares could have a material impact on Solitario’s liquidity and capital resources.

Employee stock compensation plans

Employee stock compensation plans

 

          On June 27, 2006, Solitario’s shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Option Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). Under the terms of the 2006 Plan, the Board of Directors may grant up to 2,800,000 options to Directors, officers and employees with exercise prices equal to the market price of Solitario’s common stock at the date of grant.

 

          Solitario’s outstanding options on the date of grant have a five-year term, and vest 25% on date of grant and 25% on each of the next three anniversary dates. Solitario recognizes stock option compensation expense on the date of grant for 25% of the grant date fair value, and subsequently, based upon a straight line amortization of the unvested grant date fair value of each of its outstanding options. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, Solitario recorded $174,000 and $523,000, respectively, of stock option expense for the amortization of grant date fair value with a credit to additional paid-in capital. Solitario recorded the same stock option expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

          There were no new options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 no options were exercised. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, options for 32,500 and 140,600 shares, respectively, were exercised at prices between Cdn$1.55 and Cdn$2.40 per share for cash proceeds of $51,000 and $232,000, respectively.

Earnings per share

Earnings per share

 

          The calculation of basic and diluted earnings and loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Potentially dilutive shares related to (i) outstanding common stock options of 2,433,400 shares and (ii) the RMB warrants of 1,624,748 shares during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and common stock options of 2,433,400 shares during the three and nine months ended September 31, 2011 were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effects were anti-dilutive.

Derivative instruments

Derivative instruments

 

          The following table provides a detail of the location and amount of the fair values of Solitario's derivative instruments presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

(in thousands)  Derivative Instruments
   Balance Sheet Location  September 30,
 2012
  December 31, 2011
Derivatives not designated as hedging  instruments under ASC 815         
Kinross February 2013 call option  Other current liabilities  $68   $—   
Ely investment warrants  Other current assets   —      74 
International Lithium Corp warrants  Other current assets   1    4 
Warrant derivative liability  Warrant liability   1,379    —   

 

          The following amounts are included in (loss) gain on derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

(in thousands)  Three months ended  Nine months ended
   September
30, 2012
  September
30, 2011
  September
30, 2012
  September
30, 2011
Derivatives not designated as hedging
  instruments under ASC 815
  Gain(loss)  Gain(loss)  Gain(loss)  Gain(loss)
Kinross February 2012 call option  $—     $33   $—     $33 
Ely investment warrants   (23)   (229)   (74)   (156)
International Lithium Corp warrants   1    3    (2)   3 
Kinross collar   —      —      —      (2)
    Total derivatives  $(22)  $(193)  $(76)  $(122)
Fair value

Fair value

 

          For certain of Solitario’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. Solitario’s marketable equity securities are carried at their estimated fair value primarily based on quoted market prices. The long-term debt associated with MH-LLC is carried at its estimated fair value based upon the discounted present value of the payments using an estimated discount rate, the RMB warrants and the ILC Warrants are carried at their estimated fair value based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The RMB Loan is carried at its estimated fair value based upon the loan balance, net of discounts, and any accrued interest payable.

 

          Solitario accounts for its financial instruments under ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements." ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820 also requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and establishes a hierarchy for which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of inputs as follows:

 

·Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
·Level 2: quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability; or
·Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

          The determination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were no reclassifications in financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, 2 or 3 categories.

 

          The following is a listing of Solitario’s financial assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of September 30, 2012:

 

(in thousands)   Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total 
Assets                    
Marketable equity securities  $7,648   $—     $—     $7,648 
ILC warrants - other current assets   —      1    —      1 
Liabilities                    
RMB warrants – long term liabilities   —      1,379    —      1,379 
Kinross call   68    —      —      68 

 

          Solitario has recorded a liability for the fair value of its outstanding warrants issued to RMB in connection with the RMB secured credit facility. The warrants have been recorded at their fair value at September 30, 2012 based upon a Black-Scholes model. Solitario recorded, as a component of other expense, a loss on warrant liability of $729,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

          Solitario recorded a royalty sale receivable of $4,000,000 in current assets in connection with the Sandstorm royalty sale discussed above. The determination of the initial fair value of $4,000,000 was categorized as Level 3, as there was no market data available and Solitario determined the fair value based upon its assumptions of the likelihood of payment of the receivable by Sandstorm as discussed below in Note 7, “Mineral Properties.”

 

          The following is a listing of Solitario’s financial assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the hierarchy as of December 31, 2011:

 

 

(in thousands)   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3    Total   
Assets                    
  Marketable equity securities  $10,361   $—     $—     $10,361 
   Other current assets - Ely warrants   —      74    —      74 
   Other current assets - ILC warrants   —      4    —      4 
Marketable equity securities

Marketable equity securities

 

          Solitario's investments in marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, which is based upon quoted prices of the securities owned. The cost of marketable equity securities sold is determined by the specific identification method. Changes in market value are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders' equity, unless a decline in market value is considered other than temporary, in which case the decline is recognized as a loss in the consolidated statements of operations. The following tables summarize Solitario’s marketable equity securities and accumulated other comprehensive income related to its marketable equity securities:

 

 

 

(in thousands)   September
30, 2012
  
    December
31, 2011
  
 
  Marketable equity securities at fair value  $7,648   $10,361 
  Cost   860    988 
  Accumulated other comprehensive income for
    unrealized holding gains
   6,788    9,373 
  Deferred taxes on accumulated other comprehensive
    income for unrealized holding gains
   2,532    3,496 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  $4,256   $5,877 

  

Solitario has classified $1,710,000 and $4,361,000, respectively, of marketable equity securities as current, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, which represents Solitario's estimate of the portion of marketable equity securities that will be liquidated within one year.

  

The following table represents changes in marketable equity securities:

 

(in thousands)  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
   2012  2011  2012  2011
Gross cash proceeds  $—     $—     $1,591   $1,964 
Cost   —      —      127    94 
Gross gain on sale included in earnings during the period   —      —      1,464    1,870 
Deferred taxes on gross gain on sale included in earnings   —      —      (546)   (698)
Reclassification adjustment to unrealized gain in
  other comprehensive income for net gains
  included in earnings
   —      —      (918)   (1,172)
Gross unrealized holding gain (loss) arising
  during the period included in other
  comprehensive loss.
   1,544    (1,385)   (1,121)   (4,555)
Deferred taxes on unrealized holdings (gain) loss
  included in other comprehensive loss
   (576)   516    418    1,699 
Net unrealized holding gain (loss)   968    (869)   (703)   (2,856)
Other comprehensive income (loss) from
  marketable equity securities
  $968   $(869)   (1,621)  $(4,028)
Revenue recognition

Revenue recognition

 

          Solitario records delay rental payments as revenue in the period received. Solitario received $200,000 in delay rental payments on its Bongará property during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Any payments received for the sale of property interests without reserves are recorded as a reduction of the related property’s capitalized cost. Proceeds which exceed the capitalized cost of the property without reserves are recognized as revenue. Payments received on the sale of properties with reserves are recognized as revenue to the extent the proceeds exceed the proportionate basis in the assets sold. Gain on the sale of a mineral property revenue stream is deferred to the extent there is a guarantee for the future revenue stream until such time as the potential funding obligation for the guarantee is reduced or released.

Variable interest entity

Variable interest entity

 

          Pursuant to the terms of the MH Agreement, Solitario determined that prior to earning an 80% interest in MH-LLC as a result of the completion of the Feasibility Study, MH-LLC was a variable interest entity as of December 31, 2011, of which Solitario was the primary beneficiary in accordance with ASC 810. Accordingly, Solitario consolidated MH-LLC in its consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011 in accordance with ASC 810. Solitario has determined no separate presentation of assets or liabilities was necessary per ASC 810 at December 31, 2011, as MH-LLC does not have any assets that can only be used to settle specific obligations or liabilities for which creditors do not have recourse to Solitario. As discussed in Note 1, as a result of the completion of the Feasibility Study, Solitario earned an 80% interest in MH-LLC on February 22, 2012. MH-LLC will no longer be accounted for as a variable interest entity, but will be subject to the consolidation method of accounting.