DEF 14A 1 fusb20170315_def14a.htm FORM DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ | Definitive Additional Materials

☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ | No fee required.

☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| (5) | Total fee paid:

☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| (3) | Filing Party:
| (4) | Date Filed:

TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:

We will hold the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of First US Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, on Wednesday, April 26, 2017, at the Thomasville Civic Center, 559 West Front Street, Thomasville, Alabama 36784.

We have enclosed a notice of the meeting, a proxy statement, a proxy card and the Annual Report to Shareholders for 2016 and hope that you will study the enclosed materials carefully and attend the meeting in person.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it as promptly as possible. You may return the proxy card by mail in the accompanying envelope, or you may vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone. Please review the instructions on each of these options in the proxy statement and on your proxy card. You may revoke your proxy by voting in person at the meeting, by signing and delivering a later-dated proxy card, by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by a later vote via the Internet or by telephone at any time before the proxy is voted.

Sincerely,

Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.

Chairperson of the Board

James F. House

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2017

FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.

131 West Front Street

Post Office Box 249

Thomasville, Alabama 36784

(334) 636-5424

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on

April 26, 2017

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.:

First US Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) will hold its 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at the Thomasville Civic Center, 559 West Front Street, Thomasville, Alabama 36784, on Wednesday, April 26, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, for the following purposes:

| (1) | to elect thirteen (13) directors of the Company to serve for the ensuing year;

| (2) | to ratify the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC as independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017;

| (3) | to approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation;

| (4) | to hold a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation advisory votes (every one, two or three years); and

| (5) | to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of such meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 7, 2017 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A complete list of the shareholders of the Company will be available and open for examination by any shareholder of the Company during ordinary business hours beginning two business days after the mailing of this notice of the Annual Meeting.

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Information about the Annual Meeting, including directions to attend the Annual Meeting, can be found at the following website: www.edocumentview.com/FUSB. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you are requested to complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and send it promptly by mail in the envelope provided for this purpose, or vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone using the instructions provided in the proxy statement and on your proxy card. The proxy may be revoked by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, by signing and delivering a later-dated proxy card, by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by a later vote via the Internet or by telephone at any time prior to the voting thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Beverly J. Dozier

Secretary

Thomasville, Alabama

March 22, 2017

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 2 6, 201 7: THE COMPANY’S PROXY STATEMENT AND 201 6 ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT www.edocumentview.com/FUSB.

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|  | Page |
INTRODUCTION |  |  | 1 |
Shareholders Eligible to Vote |  |  | 2 |
Information About a Quorum |  |  | 2 |
Vote Required to Approve Proposals |  |  | 2 |
Abstentions |  |  | 2 |
Voting Shares Held in “Street Name” |  |  | 3 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |  |  | 4 |
Information About Director Nominees |  |  | 4 |
Information About Executive Officers Who Are Not Also Directors |  |  | 8 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |  |  | 9 |
Director Independence |  |  | 9 |
Company Leadership Structure |  |  | 9 |
Risk Oversight |  |  | 10 |
Board Structure and Committees |  |  | 10 |
Consideration of Director Nominees |  |  | 12 |
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors |  |  | 13 |
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS |  |  | 15 |
Policy and Procedures Regarding Related Person Transactions |  |  | 15 |
Certain Transactions with Related Persons |  |  | 15 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |  |  | 16 |
Compensation Philosophy |  |  | 16 |
Oversight of the Compensation Program |  |  | 16 |
Compensation Consultant |  |  | 16 |
Elements of Executive Compensation |  |  | 16 |
Consideration of Prior Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation |  |  | 18 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT |  |  | 19 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |  |  | 20 |
2016 Summary Compensation Table |  |  | 20 |
Employment Agreement with Mr. House |  |  | 20 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control |  |  | 21 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |  |  | 22 |
Fees |  |  | 22 |
Equity Compensation |  |  | 22 |
Director Retirement Agreements |  |  | 22 |
Deferral Plan |  |  | 23 |
2016 Director Compensation Table |  |  | 24 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION |  |  | 25 |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT |  |  | 26 |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE |  |  | 28 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT |  |  | 29 |
PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS |  |  | 30 |
General |  |  | 30 |
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures |  |  | 30 |
Audit and Other Service Fees |  |  | 30 |
Vote Required; Board Recommendation |  |  | 31 |
PROPOSAL 3 ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |  |  | 32 |
PROPOSAL 4 ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTE |  |  | 33 |
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING |  |  | 34 |
OTHER MATTERS |  |  | 34 |

i

FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC.

131 West Front Street

Post Office Box 249

Thomasville, Alabama 36784

(334) 636-5424

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 2 6, 201 7

INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement is furnished on or about March 22, 2017 by First US Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) to the holders of common stock of the Company in connection with the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, to be held on Wednesday, April 26, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, at the Thomasville Civic Center, 559 West Front Street, Thomasville, Alabama 36784 (the “Annual Meeting”). The matters to be considered and acted upon are:

| (1) | the election of thirteen (13) directors of the Company;

| (2) | the ratification of the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC as independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017;

| (3) | the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation;

| (4) | a non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future executive compensation advisory votes (every one, two or three years); and

| (5) | the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors of the Company is soliciting the proxy, which is revocable at any time before it is voted. You may revoke the proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, by signing and delivering a later-dated proxy card, by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by a later vote via the internet or by telephone. We must, however, actually receive the written notice, later-dated proxy card or later internet or telephone vote before the vote of the shareholders. We will vote all properly executed proxies delivered pursuant to this solicitation at the Annual Meeting and in accordance with instructions given, if any. If no instructions are given, we will vote the proxies as recommended by the Board – FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 and the option of an annual non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 4) – and in accordance with the instructions of management as to any other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting.

To vote by proxy, you must do one of the following:

| ● | Vote via the Internet. You may vote your shares via the Internet at any time prior to 3:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 26, 2017 by following the instructions on your proxy card. The website address for Internet voting is indicated on your proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day.

| ● | Vote by Telephone. You may vote your shares by telephone by calling the toll-free number listed on your proxy card on a touch-tone telephone at any time prior to 3:00 a.m., Central Time, on April 26, 2017. Easy-to-follow voice prompts enable you to vote your shares and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day.

| ● | Vote by Mail. If you choose to vote by mail, please complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the accompanying envelope. Please promptly mail your proxy card to ensure that it is received prior to the Annual Meeting.

1

NOTE: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee who is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. You must follow the instructions for voting your shares that you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee. Please refer to the section entitled “Voting Shares Held in ‘Street Name’” for more information about how to vote your shares.

The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, facsimile and electronic communication. Banks, brokers or other nominees will forward the proxy materials to their principals or beneficial owners and obtain authorization for the execution of proxies. The Company will, upon request, reimburse banks, brokers and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to their principals or beneficial owners.

Shareholders Eligible to Vote

We are sending this Proxy Statement to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 7, 2017. Only shareholders as of this date are eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on March 7, 2017, there were 6,055,293 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding and eligible to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each share of common stock held on all matters properly to come before the Annual Meeting.

Information About a Quorum

At the Annual Meeting, the presence of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, or if the Chairperson of the Annual Meeting decides that more time is necessary for the solicitation of proxies, then the Chairperson may adjourn the Annual Meeting, with or without a shareholder vote. Alternatively, if there is a shareholder vote to adjourn the Annual Meeting based on the absence of a quorum, the named proxies will vote all shares of common stock for which they have voting authority in favor of the adjournment.

Vote Required to Approve Proposals

Assuming the presence of a quorum, the directors of the Company will be elected by a plurality of the shares cast at the Annual Meeting – in other words, the director nominees receiving the most votes will be elected (Proposal 1). The ratification of the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC as independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal 2) will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter. Proposals 3 and 4 are non-binding advisory votes regarding executive compensation. Proposal 3 calls for the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation and will require for adoption the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter. Although there is no voting standard directly applicable to Proposal 4 (advisory vote on frequency of say-on-pay vote), the option of “every year,” “every two years” or “every three years” that receives the highest number of votes cast will be considered the frequency that has been approved by the shareholders on an advisory basis.

Following the Annual Meeting, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose the results of voting on each proposal, as required by applicable rules.

Abstentions

A shareholder may abstain from voting or withhold his or her vote, as applicable (collectively, “abstentions”), with respect to each item submitted for shareholder approval, including the election of directors. Abstentions will be counted as present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum but will be counted as not voting on any proposal brought before the Annual Meeting. Since the election of directors (Proposal 1) is determined by the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, abstentions will not affect the outcome of this matter. An abstention as to the ratification of the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC as independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017 (Proposal 2) and the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation (Proposal 3) will have the same effect as voting against these proposals, given that the outcome of each proposal is determined by the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions will not affect the outcome of the advisory vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote (Proposal 4).

2

Voting Shares Held in “Street Name”

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee who is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Your broker, bank or other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or other nominee regarding how to vote your shares. If you hold your shares in “street name,” it is critical that you return the voting instruction card as directed by your broker, bank or other nominee if you want your votes to count in the election of directors (Proposal 1) and with respect to the non-binding advisory votes regarding the Company’s executive compensation (Proposals 3 and 4).

Under applicable law, if you hold your shares in “street name” and do not indicate to your broker, bank or other nominee how you want your shares to be voted in the election of directors (Proposal 1) or the executive compensation matters (Proposals 3 and 4), then your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote on these matters. Therefore, if you hold your shares in “street name” and do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote in the election of di rectors or with respect to the executive compensation matters, your shares wil l not be voted for any director nominee, the executive compensation matter s or on any other proposal with respect to which your broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary authority (resulting in a “broker non-vote”).

Broker non-votes are counted for general quorum purposes but are not deemed to be present with respect to any matter for which a broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. Broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of the election of directors (Proposal 1) but will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors based on the plurality voting standard. Broker non-votes will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the non-binding advisory votes regarding executive compensation (Proposals 3 and 4). Your bank, broker or other nominee will continue to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC as independent registered public accountants for the year ended December 31, 2017 (Proposal 2); therefore, there should be no broker non-votes with respect to this item.

3

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s Bylaws provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than three (3) and not more than twenty-five (25) directors, and, if a number is not fixed by the Board of Directors, the Bylaws state that there shall be sixteen (16) directors. There are currently fifteen (15) directors serving on the Board. However, two of our current directors have reached the mandatory retirement age set forth in the Company’s bylaws and therefore will not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. As a result, only the thirteen (13) remaining members of our Board will stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors have both determined that a Board of Directors consisting of thirteen (13) persons is practical and efficient at this point in time.

Based on the nominations of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders elect the thirteen (13) director nominees named below to hold office until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company or until their successors are elected and qualified. All of the nominees currently serve as directors. Unless “Withhold” is noted as to all or some of the nominees, proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting FOR the election of the thirteen (13) nominees to the Board of Directors. Shareholders may not vote for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE THIRTEEN (13) NOMINEES.

While we know of no reason why any nominee would be unable to serve as a director, if, before the voting at the Annual Meeting, any person nominated to be elected as a director is unable to serve, then the shares that would otherwise be voted for that person may be voted for the election of a substitute person recommended by the Board of Directors.

The following provides certain biographical information about the individuals who have been nominated for election as directors of the Company. Each of the nominees currently serves as a director of the Company. The biographical information for each of the nominees below contains a description of the individual’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, if applicable, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills that caused the Board of Directors to determine that the individual should serve as a director. The stock ownership with respect to each nominee is set forth in the table entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” that appears in this Proxy Statement.

Following the Annual Meeting, the Company, as the sole shareholder of First US Bank (the “Bank”), intends to reelect all of the newly-elected directors of the Company as directors of the Bank. Information regarding the executive officers of the Company who are not directors is also provided below.

Information About Director Nominees

Andrew C. Bearden, Jr. Director since 2009 Age 70 |  | Mr. Bearden is a Certified Public Accountant and works as a management consultant through his company, BEACO Consulting LLC, in Thomasville, Alabama. Mr. Bearden served Peoples BancTrust Co., Inc. in Selma, Alabama as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President from January 1997 until January 2007 and as Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President from January 2007 until October 2007. Mr. Bearden also served as an officer of BankTrust in Mobile, Alabama in the role of Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President from October 2007 until February 2009. Mr. Bearden’s extensive prior experience in the banking industry, specifically his experience and leadership roles with two public companies, as well as his accounting background and current consulting practice, give him a wide range of accounting, financial, capital markets, risk assessment and other executive management experience and skills, all of which provide valuable insight and expertise to the Board of Directors.

4

Linda H. Breedlove Director since 1997 Age 73 |  | Ms. Breedlove serves as a part-time writer for The South Alabamian, Inc., a newspaper publishing company. She also performs certain bookkeeping functions for The Thomasville Times. She served as Co-Publisher/Editor of The South Alabamian for 29 years until January 2003. Ms. Breedlove was employed with Breedlove Office Supply and Printing from January 2003 until April 2004. The Board of Directors believes that Ms. Breedlove’s business and management experience gained from her long career in newspaper publishing, as well as her local community and civic leadership roles and involvement and knowledge of the local market, make her a valuable contributor to the Board of Directors.
Robert Stephen Briggs Director since 2014 Age 67 |  | Mr. Briggs has more than 40 years of experience in the insurance industry, serving as a field agent, general manager and company executive. In 2008, after his retirement from Protective Life Corporation as an Executive Vice President, Mr. Briggs founded Petra Life Services, Inc., which provides insurance, financial and investment consulting services, and he currently serves as its President and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, Mr. Briggs is President and Chief Executive Officer of Longevity Quest, Inc., which provides longevity analysis for wellness management and longevity planning. He is also a member of the board of directors of American United Mutual Insurance Holding Company, currently serving as lead independent director and as a member of the Executive Committee and the Compensation Committee, and previously serving as chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Briggs’ leadership experience and knowledge of financial services resulting from his career in the insurance industry enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors.
Sheri S. Cook Director since 2014 Age 49 |  | Ms. Cook currently serves as Senior Vice President of Human Resources for Altec, Inc., an equipment and service provider based in Birmingham, Alabama. From April 2008 to July 2013, she served as Altec’s Director of Corporate Finance. Previously, Ms. Cook worked in the corporate finance, internal audit and investor relations departments of Protective Life Corporation, and also worked for Kinetic Partners, LLC and Sonat, Inc. The Board of Directors believes that Ms. Cook’s management experience and practical knowledge gained through her employment in several finance-related roles at companies in various industries allow her to provide valuable insight and expertise to the Board of Directors.
John C. Gordon Director since 1997 Age 59 |  | Mr. Gordon has been self-employed, performing forestry, timberland and investment services for Forest Services, Inc. (land management) since 1994 and for SS&J Land Co., Inc. since 1998. Mr. Gordon serves as president of both entities. Mr. Gordon’s business management, investment and risk assessment skills obtained from his leadership of these companies and his experience in the forestry business are all valuable to the Board of Directors.
William G. Harrison Director since 1976 Age 70 |  | Mr. Harrison served as Timber Settlements and Records Manager for Linden Lumber Company (sawmill) from 1999 until his retirement in 2008. For approximately 20 years prior to his position at Linden Lumber Company, Mr. Harrison was President and Chief Executive Officer of Bedsole Dry Goods, a retail chain consisting of department stores and variety stores. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Harrison’s extensive business experience, specifically his understanding of accounts management and credit and collection risk, contributes greatly to the composition of the Board of Directors.

5

James F. House Director since 2011 Age 64 |  | Mr. House became a director of the Company pursuant to an employment agreement among the Company, the Bank and Mr. House dated November 7, 2011, and Mr. House has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since that date. Mr. House has extensive experience in the banking industry. From May 2009 until November 2011, he served as Florida Division President of BankTrust. From 2005 until 2009, Mr. House was a business consultant focusing on management, investments and commercial and consumer lending issues. Prior to that, he held numerous executive and senior management positions with SouthTrust Bank, including Executive Vice President, General Bank Commercial (2003-2004); Chief Executive Officer, Urban West Region (2002-2003); Chief Executive Officer, North Alabama/Tennessee Region (2000-2001); Chief Executive Officer, Birmingham Market Bank (1999-2003); and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, SouthTrust Bank of Dothan, N.A. (1994-1998). The Board of Directors believes that, from these years of experience in a number of positions and areas in banking and his senior executive-level services to the Company and the Bank, Mr. House has gained an intimate knowledge of the banking industry and, more specifically, the business and operations of the Company and the Bank, which provides valuable insight to the Board of Directors.
J. Lee McPhearson Director since 2009 Age 63 |  | Mr. McPhearson is an attorney, currently practicing in Butler, Alabama. Mr. McPhearson also serves as County Attorney for Choctaw County, Alabama. From 1995 until 2002, Mr. McPhearson served as Circuit Judge for the First Judicial Circuit of the State of Alabama and previously served from 1981 until 1987 as District Attorney for the First Judicial Circuit. Mr. McPhearson is currently actively involved in timber and real estate enterprises. Mr. McPhearson’s experience as a legal practitioner, which involves some representation and advising of business entities, as well as his knowledge and understanding of the communities served by the Company and the Bank gained through his time on the bench, contribute greatly to the Board of Directors. Additionally, Mr. McPhearson’s experience in the timber and real estate industries provides valuable insight to the Board of Directors regarding land and timber valuations and market conditions, which are important to the business of the Company and the Bank.
Jack W. Meigs Director since 1997 Age 59 |  | Mr. Meigs served as Circuit Judge for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of the State of Alabama from 1991 until his retirement in April 2016. He is currently engaged in the private practice of law. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Meigs’ extensive legal experience in the local area, both as a practitioner and as a judge, provides him with a wide range of management skills and knowledge on topics important to businesses, which contributes greatly to the composition of the Board of Directors.

6

Aubrey S. Miller Director since 2014 Age 64 |  | Mr. Miller currently serves as President of the Shelby County, Alabama Board of Education, a position to which he was elected in 2009, and also serves as senior pastor of the Faith Church at Oxmoor Valley in Birmingham, Alabama. Previously, Mr. Miller served as Executive Director of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation in Birmingham, Alabama from 2009 until his retirement in July 2015 and now serves as the Senior Vice President of Financial Development for the YMCA of Greater Birmingham. He also served as President and Chief Development Officer of the Baptist Health Foundation in Birmingham from 2005 to 2008. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Miller’s extensive experience in leading multiple organizations and in effectively creating and implementing budgets and strategic plans allows him to provide valuable insight and advice to the Board of Directors.
Donna D. Smith Director since 2014 Age 68 |  | Ms. Smith served as the Vice President of Human Resources and Ethics for Alabama Power Company from 2010 until her retirement in February 2014 and as Human Resources Director of Alabama Power Company and Southern Company Generation for several years prior to that. She also served on the board of directors of the Alabama Power Company Foundation and remains active in leadership positions with several philanthropic organizations and boards. The Board of Directors believes that Ms. Smith brings a valuable perspective to the Board of Directors as a result of her extensive experience in a highly-regulated industry, deep and broad business experience as an executive at one of the largest employers in the state of Alabama and strong history of community involvement.
Howard M. Whitted Director since 1985 Age 72 |  | Mr. Whitted was a forester for Weyerhaeuser Company, a forest products and container board manufacturer, from 1968 until his retirement in 2006. Mr. Whitted is currently a forester and manager for Whitted Family Holdings. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Whitted’s general business experience and, specifically, his experience in the real estate and forestry industry, provides valuable insight to the Board of Directors regarding land and timber valuations and market conditions, which are important to the business of the Company and the Bank.
Bruce N. Wilson Director since 1997 Age 62 |  | Mr. Wilson is the senior member in the law firm of Wilson & Drinkard, where he has worked since 1993. Through his law practice, Mr. Wilson has represented and continues to represent business and corporate clients throughout all phases of their operations. He counsels clients on various real estate, industrial and economic development, and budgetary and auditing issues. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Wilson’s experience and understanding of these issues enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors.

7

Information About Executive Officers Who Are Not Also Directors

Thomas S. Elley Age 45 |  | Mr. Elley has served as the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Company and the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Bank since October 2013. Prior to his employment with the Company and the Bank, Mr. Elley served as the Vice President, Accounting Policy Manager and Line of Business Controller at Regions Financial Corporation in Birmingham, Alabama. From January 2000 to August 2010 and from April 2011 to May 2013, Mr. Elley served in various roles in the audit practice at Deloitte & Touche LLP, including Senior Manager, where he focused on Securities and Exchange Commission reporting, regulatory accounting and internal control audits under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. From August 2010 to March 2011, Mr. Elley held the position of Impaired Loan Accounting Specialist with Iberiabank Corporation in Birmingham, Alabama. Mr. Elley also has prior experience as a compliance officer and loan analyst for financial institutions and is a Certified Public Accountant.

William C. Mitchell Age 51 |  | Mr. Mitchell has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank’s subsidiary, Acceptance Loan Company, Inc., since February 2008 and, prior to that, as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer beginning in November 2007. Mr. Mitchell has worked for Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. since May 1997.
Anthony G. Cashio Age 67 |  | Mr. Cashio joined the Bank in October 2012 and currently serves as Executive Vice President, Credit Division, and Chief Credit Officer. Prior to his employment with the Bank, Mr. Cashio served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Gulf South Private Bank in Destin, Florida from December 2011 until October 2012; Regional Credit Officer and Senior Vice President of Cadence Bank from December 2006 until November 2011; and Senior Vice President and Risk Manager of Wachovia Bank from November 2004 until December 2006. Prior to November 2004, Mr. Cashio held a number of positions with SouthTrust Bank over a twenty-year period.
Beverly J. Dozier Age 52 |  | Ms. Dozier currently serves as Vice President, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer of the Company and Senior Vice President, Executive Administration, of the Bank. Ms. Dozier has served the Bank in numerous capacities since 1984, including working as a loan officer and mortgage originator.

8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company is committed to having sound corporate governance principles. Operating in accordance with such principles is essential to running the Company’s business effectively and to maintaining the Company’s integrity in the marketplace. The Company’s Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that sets forth basic principles to guide the Company’s and the Bank’s employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other senior executive officers, in their conduct and compliance with applicable laws and governance principles. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We will furnish any person without charge, upon written request, a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The following is a summary of the Company’s Board independence standards, the Board and committee structure, the director-nomination process and the procedures for shareholders to follow to communicate with the Board of Directors.

Director Independence

The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, the exchange on which the Company’s common stock is listed (“Nasdaq”), requires that a majority of the Company’s Board members be “independent.” Accordingly, because the Board of Directors currently has fifteen (15) members, at least eight (8) of the directors must be independent. Following the Annual Meeting, after which the Company will have thirteen (13) members, at least seven (7) of the directors must be independent. In accordance with Nasdaq’s listing rules, a director is not considered to be independent unless the Board determines that the director has no relationship with the Company or its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries) that would interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also must meet the independence tests in the applicable Nasdaq listing rules and the federal securities laws.

The Board has determined that none of the directors standing for reelection, with the exception of Mr. House, has any material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries) that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. In making this determination, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such transactions or relationships were material and possibly inconsistent with a determination that the director was independent. Mr. House is not independent because of his employment as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank.

While conducting its review of director independence, the Board of Directors specifically considered the relationship between the Company and Wilson & Drinkard, of which Mr. Wilson is the senior member. Wilson & Drinkard is a law firm that has provided legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries in the past. The Company’s fee arrangement with Wilson & Drinkard is negotiated on the same basis and is subject to the same terms and conditions as arrangements with other outside legal counsel for similar types of legal work. During 2016, the Company did not pay any legal fees to Wilson & Drinkard. Based on this review, the Board concluded that the Company’s relationship with Wilson & Drinkard does not interfere with Mr. Wilson’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Company Leadership Structure

The business of the Company is managed under the direction of the Board of Directors, which is elected by our shareholders. The basic responsibility of the Board is to lead the Company by exercising its business judgment to act in what each director reasonably believes to be the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Leadership is important to the effective operation of the Board for the benefit of the Company. The role of the Chairperson includes providing continuous feedback on the direction, performance and strategy of the Company, presiding over meetings of the Board, setting the Board’s agenda with management and leading the Board in anticipating and responding to risks faced by the Company.

9

The roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board have been separated since the Company became a publicly-traded company. While the Board believes that the Chief Executive Officer should be a member of the Board, the Board considers it to be advantageous to independence, oversight and objectivity to have a separate, independent board member to serve as Chairperson. The Board may reconsider this leadership structure from time to time based on then-current considerations.

Risk Oversight

General oversight of the Company’s risk management process is the responsibility of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

The Company is exposed to a number of risks and regularly undertakes a review to identify and evaluate these risks and develop plans to manage them effectively. While the Chief Executive Officer has overall responsibility for risk assessment, management and prioritization, the Board has an active role in the risk oversight process.

The Board regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s financial, credit, liquidity, operational, legal, regulatory, compliance, reputational and strategic risks based on reports from management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Although the full Board is ultimately involved in the risk oversight process, information regarding certain risks is reviewed first by the committees of the Board when a particular risk falls within the purview of a particular committee. For example, the Compensation Committee of the Board oversees the management of risks relating to the Company’s compensation policies and practices, including executive compensation. The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks associated with the independence of the members of the Board and potential conflicts of interest. The Audit Committee oversees the management of financial risks (including risks required to be monitored under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). The conclusions of each Board committee are brought to the attention of all Board members at the regularly-scheduled meetings of the Board. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate with respect to the risk oversight role.

Board Structure and Committees

The Board of Directors of the Company conducts its business through meetings of the Board and Board committees. Further, executive sessions of the independent directors of the Board are to be held at least two times a year and otherwise as needed. These sessions are chaired by the Chairperson of the Board or another independent director selected by a majority of the independent directors.

During 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company met 12 times in regularly-scheduled meetings and held one special meeting. All of the incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served during the year.

Directors are encouraged but not required to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders each year. All of the then-current directors attended the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 27, 2016.

10

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board with its oversight responsibilities with respect to the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to its shareholders and others, the Company’s financial policies and procedures and disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s system of internal controls and the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is posted on the Bank’s website at http://www.firstusbank.com under the tabs “Investor Relations” – “FUSB Policies.” The Audit Committee is required on an annual basis to review and reassess the adequacy of its charter and recommend any changes to the full Board. Any revisions to the charter are to be made by the full Board. The Audit Committee last reviewed and assessed the adequacy of its charter on March 15, 2017. The Audit Committee met five times during 2016. The Audit Committee Report appears later in this Proxy Statement.

Certain Nasdaq listing rules and the federal securities laws require that at least one member of the Audit Committee must have an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements, the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves, experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities, an understanding of internal control over financial reporting and an understanding of audit committee functions. The Board has determined that Andrew C. Bearden, Jr. and Robert Stephen Briggs each has the requisite attributes of an “audit committee financial expert.” Mr. Bearden acquired such attributes through his experience as a certified public accountant and through his supervision as chief financial officer of the financial reporting and compliance of a publicly-traded financial institution. Mr. Briggs acquired such attributes through his experience overseeing the financial performance of a major division of a national life insurance company and through his service on other boards of directors of companies in the financial services industry, including audit committee service.

The current members of the Audit Committee are A. J. Strickland, III, Chairperson, Andrew C. Bearden, Jr., Robert Stephen Briggs, Gerald P. Corgill, William G. Harrison, Jack W. Meigs and Donna D. Smith. Following the Annual Meeting, at which Dr. Strickland and Mr. Corgill will not stand for reelection, the Board anticipates that the Audit Committee will consist of the remaining current members of the Audit Committee. The Board has carefully evaluated the backgrounds of the members of the Audit Committee and determined that such members qualify as “independent,” as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing rules and as defined in the committee’s charter.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in overseeing and determining executive compensation. Among other responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviews, recommends and approves salaries and other compensation of the Company’s executive officers and administers the Company’s equity compensation plans that may be in place from time to time. The Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee with determining the amount of compensation to be paid to the other executive officers but does not play a role in the final determination or approval of his own compensation. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is posted on the Bank’s website at http://www.firstusbank.com under the tabs “Investor Relations” – “FUSB Policies.” The Compensation Committee is required on an annual basis to review and reassess the adequacy of its charter and recommend any changes to the full Board. Any revisions to the charter are to be made by the full Board. The Compensation Committee last reviewed and assessed the adequacy of its charter on March 15, 2017. The Compensation Committee met six times in 2016. The Compensation Committee Report appears later in this Proxy Statement.

The scope of the Compensation Committee’s authority is limited to the responsibilities that are set forth in its charter. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees to the extent permitted by applicable law. The charter further provides the Compensation Committee with the authority to engage independent consultants and legal advisers when determined to be necessary or appropriate in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any such consultant or legal adviser, including sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Company’s compensation programs, plans and practices for all of its employees as they relate to risk management and risk-taking initiatives to ascertain if they serve to encourage or incentivize risks that are “reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect” on the Company. As a result of this process, the Compensation Committee concluded and informed the Board that, based on the Company’s current compensation programs, plans and practices, there are no such risks.

11

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Donna D. Smith, Chairperson, Andrew C. Bearden, Jr., Robert Stephen Briggs, Sheri S. Cook, John C. Gordon, J. Lee McPhearson and A. J. Strickland, III. Following the Annual Meeting, at which Dr. Strickland will not stand for reelection, the Board anticipates that the Compensation Committee will consist of the remaining current members of the Compensation Committee. The Board has carefully evaluated the backgrounds of the members of the Compensation Committee and determined that such members qualify as “independent,” as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing rules and as defined in the committee’s charter.

Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Among other responsibilities, the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and recommends the selection of directors and members of committees of the Board and reviews and establishes the governance practices of the Company. The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is posted on the Bank’s website at http://www.firstusbank.com under the tabs “Investor Relations” – “FUSB Policies.” The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is required on an annual basis to review and reassess the adequacy of its charter and recommend any changes to the full Board. Any revisions to the charter are to be made by the full Board. The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee last reviewed and assessed the adequacy of its charter on March 15, 2017. The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2016.

The members of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Andrew C. Bearden, Jr., Chairperson, Sheri S. Cook, John C. Gordon, J. Lee McPhearson, Donna D. Smith, A. J. Strickland, III and Bruce N. Wilson. Following the Annual Meeting, at which Dr. Strickland will not stand for reelection, the Board anticipates that the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consist of the remaining current members of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has carefully evaluated the backgrounds of the members of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and determined that such members qualify as “independent,” as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing rules and as defined in the committee’s charter.

Consideration of Director Nominees

Criteria and Diversity

Criteria that are used by the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with evaluating and selecting new directors include factors relating to whether the candidate would meet the definition of “independent,” as defined by the applicable Nasdaq listing rules, as well as the candidate’s skills, occupation and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Board believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.

The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee continually reviews the qualifications and responsibilities of all directors in consideration of the Board’s overall responsibility to shareholders. Although neither the Board nor the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the director nomination process is designed to ensure that the Board considers members with diverse backgrounds, including race, ethnicity, gender, education, skills and experience, with a focus on appropriate financial and other expertise relevant to the Company’s business, and also considers issues of judgment, conflicts of interest, integrity, ethics and commitment to the goal of maximizing shareholder value. The goal of this process is to assemble a group of directors with deep, varied experience, sound judgment and commitment to the success of the Company. For a discussion of the individual experience and qualifications of our directors, please refer to “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” in this Proxy Statement.

12

Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees

The process followed by the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate candidates includes requests to Board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates, and interviews of selected candidates by members of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. Assuming that the appropriate biographical and background material discussed below is provided on behalf of candidates recommended by shareholders, the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate those candidates by applying substantially the same criteria and following substantially the same process as that used for candidates submitted by Board members.

Director Nominees Proposed by Shareholders

The Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders for inclusion by the Board of Directors in the slate of nominees that the Board recommends to the shareholders for election. In considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders, the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee applies the selection criteria and follows the process described above.

Shareholders may recommend individuals for the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider as potential director candidates by submitting the following information to the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary of First US Bancshares, Inc., 131 West Front Street, P.O. Box 249, Thomasville, Alabama 36784:

| ● | the name of the recommended person;

| ● | all information relating to the recommended person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

| ● | the written consent of the recommended person to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected;

| ● | as to the shareholder making the recommendation, the name and address of such shareholder as the name and address appear on the Company’s books; provided, however, that, if the shareholder is not a registered holder of the Company’s common stock, the shareholder should submit his or her name and address along with a current written statement from the registered holder; and

| ● | a statement disclosing whether such shareholder is acting with or on behalf of any other person and, if applicable, the identity of such person.

Any such recommendation must be received at the address above not less than 120 calendar days before the first anniversary of the date on which the Company’s proxy statement was released to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting, which date for the ensuing year is November 22, 2017.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by shareholders and will respond as the Board deems appropriate. Absent unusual circumstances or as contemplated by committee charters, the Chairperson of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee primarily will be responsible for monitoring communications from shareholders and providing copies or summaries of such communications to the other directors as he or she deems appropriate. Communications will be forwarded to all directors if such communications relate to substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the Chairperson of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers important.

13

Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to send communications on any topic to the Board should address such communications to:

Chairperson of the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

c/o Corporate Secretary of First US Bancshares, Inc.

131 West Front Street

P.O. Box 249

Thomasville, Alabama 36784

All written communications to the Company’s Board of Directors will be relayed to the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee without being screened by management.

14

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

The Company recognizes that transactions between the Company or its subsidiaries and any of its directors or executive officers may present potential or actual conflicts of interest that are not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Therefore, as a general matter and in accordance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Company prefers to avoid such transactions. Nevertheless, there are situations where such transactions may be in, or may not be inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Therefore, the Company has adopted a written policy and procedures that require the Audit Committee to review and, if appropriate, to approve or ratify any such transactions.

Policy and Procedures Regarding Related Person Transactions

The Audit Committee’s Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions sets forth the process for reviewing, approving and ratifying transactions involving the Company and its subsidiaries and “related persons.” “Related persons” include directors and executive officers and their immediate family members and shareholders owning 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. It is the Company’s policy to approve and ratify transactions involving related persons only when the Board of Directors, acting through the Audit Committee, determines that the transaction in question is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

The procedures provide that, prior to entering into a related person transaction, management or the affected director or executive officer must bring the matter to the attention of a designated individual who will assess whether the matter should be considered by the Audit Committee. If a member of the Audit Committee is involved in the proposed transaction, he or she will be recused from all discussions and decisions about the transaction. To the extent that a related person transaction is not identified in advance, the terms of the transaction will be reviewed and evaluated by the Audit Committee. Only transactions that are in, or that are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders are approved or ratified by the Audit Committee.

Certain Transactions with Related Persons

Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and their family members are customers of, and have had transactions with, the Bank in the ordinary course of business, and additional transactions likely will take place in the ordinary course of business. All outstanding loans and commitments to date have been made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including with respect to interest rates and collateral, as for comparable transactions with unrelated persons, and have not involved more than the normal risk of collectability or presented other unfavorable features.

15

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should link rewards to business results and shareholders’ returns. Specifically, the compensation program should attract, retain and motivate the executive officers necessary for our current and long-term success and should tie executive compensation with the performance of the Company.

Oversight of the Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program and approves the compensation paid to all executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the two other most highly-compensated executive officers during 2016 – Mr. House, Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Elley (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

Our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing and approving the amount, form and terms of compensation to be paid to the Named Executive Officers and assessing and making recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation and benefit plans and programs. The Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee with determining the amount of compensation to be paid to the other executive officers but does not play a role in the final determination or approval of his own compensation. Our Human Resources Department also assists the Compensation Committee with compensation decisions by providing support and data for the committee.

Compensation Consultant

The charter of the Compensation Committee grants the committee the authority to hire outside consultants to further its objectives and assist with its responsibilities. During 2016, Matthews, Young & Associates, Inc. (“Matthews Young”), which has been engaged by the Compensation Committee in prior years to consult on various compensation matters, assisted the Compensation Committee by continuing to review, assess and provide recommendations with respect to certain aspects of the Company’s compensation program for executive officers. In this role, Matthews Young rendered services specifically requested by the Compensation Committee, which included providing a comparative analysis of compensation paid to the Company’s directors and executive officers for the 2016 fiscal year compared to other institutions in the Company’s peer group.

The Company does not have a policy that limits the services that an executive compensation consultant can perform. However, the Company has not engaged Matthews Young for any projects other than those directed by the Compensation Committee, as described above. Matthews Young has not performed any other services for the Company.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Compensation is based on an individual’s job level, responsibilities and experience and Company performance. We want to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high caliber personnel and, to that end, provide a total compensation opportunity that is competitive in the banking industry, taking into account relative company size and performance as well as individual responsibilities and achievements.

Base Salaries

Each Named Executive Officer’s base salary is determined principally by the responsibilities required by the officer’s position, his experience and contributions to our business and length of service in his position at the Company, as well as individual competence and comparison to peer institutions. Base salaries are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee annually to determine whether the base salary levels are appropriate.

16

At its meeting in November 2016, the Compensation Committee established the base salaries for the Named Executive Officers for 2017 and determined that the following base salaries were appropriate: for Mr. House, $330,000; for Mr. Mitchell, $207,000; and for Mr. Elley, $207,000. These salaries represent an increase of 0.4%, 3.8% and 3.8%, respectively, over the salaries paid in 2016.

Equity Awards and Incentive Compensation

Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the United Security Bancshares, Inc. 2013 Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”), which was adopted by our Board of Directors on March 22, 2013 and approved by our shareholders on May 16, 2013. The Omnibus Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance compensation awards, including performance-based cash bonuses, to employees, non-employee directors and certain consultants of the Company and its affiliates, including the Bank.

We awarded nonqualified stock options to our Named Executive Officers in both 2015 and 2016. Nonqualified stock options are inherently performance-based and align the interests of the executive officers with those of the shareholders because the exercise price is granted at the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and the option has value only if the price of our common stock appreciates over time.

On February 23, 2015, we awarded nonqualified options to purchase shares of our common stock to our directors and executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, and several other employees of the Bank. These options had an exercise price of $8.23 per share and vested one year after the date of grant, or February 23, 2016. In connection with this award, Mr. House received a grant of 10,500 options, Mr. Mitchell a grant of 6,500 options and Mr. Elley a grant of 5,900 options.

On February 24, 2016, we awarded nonqualified options to purchase shares of our common stock to our directors and executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, and several other employees of the Bank. These options had an exercise price of $8.30 per share. Options issued to executive officers in 2016 vest in equal increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. In connection with this award, Mr. House received a grant of 11,000 options, Mr. Mitchell a grant of 6,800 options and Mr. Elley a grant of 6,100 options.

On February 22, 2017, we awarded nonqualified options to purchase shares of our common stock to our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers. These options have an exercise price of $14.11 per share and vest in equal increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. In connection with this award, Mr. House received a grant of 11,000 options, Mr. Mitchell a grant of 7,000 options and Mr. Elley a grant of 7,000 options.

2016 Cash Incentive Program

During 2016, each of the Named Executive Officers participated in a cash incentive program for certain executive officers and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries designed to incentivize the achievement of specified short-term performance criteria. Under the cash incentive program, each Named Executive Officer had the opportunity to earn a one-time cash payment equal to a predetermined percentage of his 2016 base salary, with the earned amount based on the level of performance with respect to certain corporate objectives applicable to the Company and the Bank, in the case of Mr. House and Mr. Elley, or ALC, in the case of Mr. Mitchell. For Mr. House and Mr. Elley, the cash incentive payment was based on the Company’s pre-tax income and return on average assets and the level of decrease in non-performing assets at the Bank. Mr. Mitchell’s cash incentive was based on the Company’s pre-tax income and return on average assets, as well as ALC’s pre-tax income and average loans outstanding over the twelve-month performance period. Each Named Executive Officer’s cash incentive payment was potentially subject to a downward adjustment as a result of certain classified asset ratios, regulatory ratings and percentages of loans past due at the Bank, in the case of Mr. House and Mr. Elley, or at ALC, in the case of Mr. Mitchell; however, none of these negative criteria were triggered during 2016. In connection with this program, Mr. House earned $7,398, Mr. Mitchell earned $65,628 and Mr. Elley earned $2,888.

17

Termination and Change in Control Benefits

We believe that it is important to protect the financial interests of our senior management in the event of a change in control. Further, we believe that the interests of the Company’s shareholders are best served if the interests of our senior management are aligned with the shareholders’ interests. Providing change in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of senior management to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of our shareholders.

Mr. House, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the only Named Executive Officer with an employment agreement. On December 19, 2013, the Company, the Bank and Mr. House entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement that replaced the original employment agreement entered into by the Company, the Bank and Mr. House on November 7, 2011, when Mr. House first began serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. In addition to setting forth various terms with respect to Mr. House’s base salary, the equity compensation, perquisites and other benefits to which Mr. House is entitled, and certain restrictive covenants, the employment agreement contains certain termination and change in control provisions, the details of which are further discussed under the caption, “Employment Agreement with Mr. House.”

Additionally, we have entered into a Change in Control Agreement with each of Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Elley, pursuant to which certain payments are required in connection with a change in control. For more information, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” contained herein.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

We provide our Named Executive Officers with limited perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain qualified senior management. We believe that perquisites for executive officers should be limited in scope and value and also should reflect similar perquisites provided to executive officers at other banks of comparable size.

Perquisites provided include, in some cases, payment of cell phone fees, subscription radio fees and club dues, as well as a company-provided automobile and reimbursement of reasonable expenses in operating such automobile. Additionally, the company pays the annual premiums for a term life insurance policy with a $250,000 death benefit for Mr. House and currently provides Mr. House and Mr. Elley with temporary housing in Thomasville, Alabama. Otherwise, the Named Executive Officers participate in our employee benefit plans and programs on the same terms and conditions as other employees. The benefits available generally include medical and dental insurance, disability insurance and life insurance. In addition, we sponsor a 401(k) plan in which all eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, may participate.

Consideration of Prior Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

We provide our shareholders with the opportunity annually to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (often referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote). Although the “say-on-pay” vote is advisory and non-binding, the Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the vote as part of its executive compensation planning process. At the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 27, 2016, approximately 83% of the shares represented at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the “say-on-pay” proposal were voted in favor of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for that meeting. The Company’s Compensation Committee considered this high level of shareholder support when determining the compensation for 2017 but did not take any actions in 2016 or to date in 2017 specifically in response to the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation. The Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s compensation program should continue to emphasize the objectives described herein.

18

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee, composed of independent directors, reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s management. Based on the review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

This report furnished by the Compensation Committee:

Donna D. Smith, Chairperson

Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.

Robert Stephen Briggs

Sheri S. Cook

John C. Gordon

J. Lee McPhearson

A. J. Strickland, III

19

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2016 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, a summary of the compensation paid to or earned by the Named Executive Officers. Note that, as a “smaller reporting company” and pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is providing compensation information for 2016 and 2015 for Mr. House, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, and Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Elley, as the two most highly compensated executive officers of the Company other than Mr. House who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2016.

Name and Principal Position | Year |  | Salary |  |  | Option Awards(1) |  |  | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) |  |  | All Other Compensation(3) |  |  | Total |
James F. House(4) | 2016 |  | $ | 328,800 |  |  | $ | 22,220 |  |  | $ | 7,398 |  |  | $ | 37,599 |  |  | $ | 396,017 |
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank | 2015 |  | $ | 313,824 |  |  | $ | 41,790 |  |  | $ | 31,775 |  |  | $ | 37,563 |  |  | $ | 424,952 |
William C. Mitchell | 2016 |  | $ | 199,500 |  |  | $ | 13,736 |  |  | $ | 65,628 |  |  | $ | 13,236 |  |  | $ | 292,100 |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. | 2015 |  | $ | 193,000 |  |  | $ | 25,870 |  |  | $ | 25,126 |  |  | $ | 14,152 |  |  | $ | 258,148 |
Thomas S. Elley | 2016 |  | $ | 196,292 |  |  | $ | 12,322 |  |  | $ | 2,888 |  |  | $ | 18,624 |  |  | $ | 230,126 |
Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the Bank | 2015 |  | $ | 175,000 |  |  | $ | 23,482 |  |  | $ | 11,813 |  |  | $ | 19,078 |  |  | $ | 229,373 |

(1) | Option awards are reported as the grant date fair value of the options, computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. These amounts represent the grant date fair value of options awarded to Messrs. House, Mitchell and Elley in February 2016 and February 2015.

(2) | Represents cash paid under the 2016 cash incentive program.

(3) | The following table describes each component in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2016 and 2015.

Name | Year |  | 401(k) Contributions |  |  | Life Insurance Premiums |  |  | AD&D Insurance Premiums |  |  | Automobile |  |  | Housing Allowance |  |  | Cell Phone Fees |  |  | Other |  |  | Total |
James F. House | 2016 |  | $ | 10,600 |  |  | $ | 5,301 |  |  | $ | 96 |  |  | $ | 1,769 |  |  | $ | 17,843 |  |  | $ | 1,170 |  |  | $ | 820 |  |  | $ | 37,599 |
| 2015 |  | $ | 10,526 |  |  | $ | 5,301 |  |  | $ | 96 |  |  | $ | 1,559 |  |  | $ | 18,466 |  |  | $ | 1,170 |  |  | $ | 445 |  |  | $ | 37,563 |
William C. Mitchell | 2016 |  | $ | 8,980 |  |  | $ | 566 |  |  | $ | 77 |  |  | $ | 2,300 |  |  |  | -- |  |  | $ | 1,169 |  |  | $ | 144 |  |  | $ | 13,236 |
| 2015 |  | $ | 8,680 |  |  | $ | 566 |  |  | $ | 77 |  |  | $ | 3,631 |  |  |  | -- |  |  | $ | 1,080 |  |  | $ | 118 |  |  | $ | 14,152 |
Thomas S. Elley | 2016 |  | $ | 7,898 |  |  | $ | 620 |  |  | $ | 84 |  |  | $ | 810 |  |  | $ | 8,042 |  |  | $ | 1,170 |  |  |  | -- |  |  | $ | 18,624 |
| 2015 |  | $ | 7,767 |  |  | $ | 620 |  |  | $ | 84 |  |  | $ | 1,494 |  |  | $ | 7,943 |  |  | $ | 1,170 |  |  |  | -- |  |  | $ | 19,078 |

For Mr. House, “Other” compensation for 2016 includes $442 in club dues and $378 for a radio subscription service fee, and for 2015 includes $420 in club dues and $25 for a radio subscription service fee. For Mr. Mitchell, this amount represents a radio subscription service fee paid in 2016 and 2015.

(4) | Mr. House’s employment agreement sets forth the terms of his employment, including his minimum compensation. See the discussion under “Employment Agreement with Mr. House” for additional information about Mr. House’s current employment agreement.

Employment Agreement with Mr. House

On December 19, 2013, Mr. House entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement (the “2013 Employment Agreement”) with the Company and the Bank, which became effective on January 1, 2014 and replaced the employment agreement entered into by Mr. House with the Company and the Bank on November 7, 2011, when Mr. House first began serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. A copy of the 2013 Employment Agreement was included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2013.

20

The agreement’s initial term is three years, with an additional year added to the term on each anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, unless one of the parties provides notice of its intention not to extend the term in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The agreement provides that Mr. House will be paid and eligible for the following compensation, among other employee benefits: an annual base salary of $313,384, subject to increase by the Board of Directors (which annual base salary was first increased by the Board of Directors at its November 2015 meeting); term life insurance coverage in the amount of $250,000; the use of a company-owned automobile and reimbursement of reasonable expenses in operating such automobile; temporary housing in Thomasville, Alabama; and reimbursement of ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of his duties as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and the Bank. In addition, for each year of the term of the agreement, Mr. House will be eligible to receive an annual long-term incentive award under the Omnibus Incentive Plan of up to 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, options to purchase up to 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, or some combination of the foregoing. The agreement also contains non-compete and confidentiality restrictions. Specifically, Mr. House is prohibited from competing with the Company or the Bank for two (2) years following the termination of his employment and from disclosing confidential and proprietary information for a period of three (3) years after the termination of his employment.

Under the terms of the 2013 Employment Agreement, Mr. House is entitled to certain payments and benefits if his employment terminates due to his retirement, death or involuntary termination, or if his termination is related to a change in control of the Company or the Bank. In the event that Mr. House’s employment terminates due to his death or disability, or Mr. House terminates his employment for any reason other than “good reason,” he is entitled to any accrued and unpaid base salary earned through the date of termination and all vested amounts payable and vested benefits accrued under any otherwise applicable plan, policy, program or practice in which Mr. House was a participant. If Mr. House is involuntarily terminated without “cause” or Mr. House terminates his employment for “good reason,” he is entitled to (i) a lump sum cash payment within thirty (30) days following his termination in an amount equal to the greater of either one (1) times his base salary then in effect or the amount of the base salary that otherwise would have been payable to Mr. House for the remainder of the term and (ii) reimbursement for any premiums paid by Mr. House for COBRA health continuation coverage, subject to limitations in the agreement. In the event of a change in control, Mr. House is not entitled to any payment unless he is terminated or he terminates his employment within six (6) months following the change in control. If Mr. House is terminated without “cause” or if he terminates his employment for “good reason” during the six (6) months following a change in control, he is entitled to a lump sum cash payment within thirty (30) days following his termination an amount equal to two hundred ninety-nine percent (299%) of his “base amount,” as defined in Section 280G(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, subject to all applicable withholdings.

Internal Revenue Code Section 409A imposes significant taxes on an executive officer in the event that he receives deferred compensation that does not satisfy certain statutory and regulatory requirements in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. However, it is the intent of the Company and the Bank that the amounts payable to Mr. House under the employment agreement comply with or are exempt from Section 409A.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Mr. House’s 2013 Employment Agreement contains severance provisions pursuant to which Mr. House is entitled to certain payments or benefits in the event that his employment is terminated without “cause” or for “good reason.” See the discussion under “Employment Agreement with Mr. House” for additional information about these potential payments.

In addition, on May 20, 2014, the Company entered into Change in Control Agreements with certain of its executive officers (collectively, the “CIC Agreements”), including Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Elley. Each of the CIC Agreements provides for an eighteen-month period following a “change in control” (as defined in the CIC Agreements) during which each of the executive officers will be, upon experiencing a “qualifying termination of employment” (as defined in the CIC Agreements), entitled to a one-time lump sum payment by the Company in an amount equal to two hundred percent (200%) of the executive officer’s annual base salary in effect as of the date of termination, in addition to any rights and welfare benefits provided to the executive officer under any plans and programs upon termination of employment. Each of the CIC Agreements also provides that, during the employment period and for a period of two years following termination of employment, each of the executive officers will be bound by covenants not to compete and not to solicit customers or employees; provided, however, that the non-competition provisions of the CIC Agreements will only apply in the event that the executive officer is entitled to the one-time lump sum payment described above. The CIC Agreements with Mr. Elley and Mr. Mitchell are filed as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively, to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2014.

21

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

In establishing director compensation, the Company considers the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company and the skill level required by the Company of members of the Board, as well as the importance of attracting and retaining qualified candidates to serve on the Board.

Fees

Compensation for the non-employee directors of the Company is $600 per month for service as directors and $500 per board meeting attended. The Chairperson of the Board receives an additional $750 per month. Non-employee committee members receive $250 per committee meeting attended, and the Chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each receive an additional $150 per committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors are also compensated for attending training meetings, or similar meetings, at the same level as for committee meetings and are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.

All of the non-employee directors of the Company also serve as the directors of the Bank, and they receive $400 per month for this service to the Bank. The non-employee directors of the Bank’s subsidiary, Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. (“ALC”), each receive $250 per meeting attended, with the exception of the Chairperson, who receives an additional $150 per meeting attended. The non-employee members of the Board of Directors of ALC include Bruce N. Wilson, Chairperson, Linda H. Breedlove, Robert Stephen Briggs, Gerald P. Corgill, William G. Harrison and Howard M. Whitted. The non-employee directors of the Bank’s subsidiary, FUSB Reinsurance, Inc., receive $250 per meeting attended. The non-employee members of the Board of Directors of FUSB Reinsurance, Inc. are Robert Stephen Briggs, Chairperson, Linda H. Breedlove, William G. Harrison, Jack W. Meigs and Aubrey S. Miller.

Equity Compensation

Our directors are eligible to participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan, under which they may receive grants of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other types of equity awards designed to align the interests of the directors with those of the Company’s shareholders. On February 24, 2016, we awarded nonqualified options to purchase shares of our common stock to our directors. These options had an exercise price of $8.30 per share and vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The value of the option grant to each director is set forth in the “2016 Director Compensation Table” below.

On February 22, 2017, we awarded a total of 6,466 shares of restricted common stock to our directors. The shares vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date, after which time such shares will no longer be restricted. During the restricted period, the directors are entitled to vote and receive dividends with respect to their shares of common stock but may not transfer the shares, outside of certain narrow exceptions.

Director Retirement Agreements

In order to encourage the members of the Board of Directors to continue to serve as directors of the Company, we have entered into director retirement agreements all of the non-employee directors of the Company, with the exception of Mr. Briggs, Ms. Cook, Mr. Miller, Ms. Smith and Dr. Strickland. The director retirement agreements are nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements that are designed to motivate the directors to serve on the Board until their retirement.

22

The director retirement agreements were initially executed in 2002 with each member of the Board at that time, including current directors Breedlove, Corgill, Gordon, Harrison, Meigs, Whitted and Wilson. In their original form, these agreements promised each director a benefit that to be paid annually for ten years generally beginning on the later of the date on which the director reached age 70 or the date on which the director terminated service as a director. The amount of the benefit was initially set at $12,000 in September 2002 and was scheduled to increase by 3% each year until the director reached age 70 or his or her service as a director was terminated. The benefit was to be reduced if the director retired before age 70 or terminated service as a director due to a disability before age 70.

The director retirement agreements provide a change in control benefit. We believe that the interests of the Company’s shareholders will be best served if the interests of our directors are aligned with the shareholders’ interests. Therefore, the director retirement agreements provide that, if a director is terminated following a change in control of the Company or a change in control of the Bank, we will pay the director annually for ten years, beginning at age 70, an amount equal to the maximum benefit that he or she would have been entitled to receive had the director terminated service as a director at age 70.

The director retirement agreements are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. On November 20, 2008, the Company and the Bank entered into amendments to the director retirement agreements for each director at the time, the purpose of which was to ensure that the terms of the director retirement agreements comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A so that the directors would avoid potential negative tax consequences. The amendments to the director retirement agreements did not materially change the scope or amount of benefits to which the directors are entitled but may affect the time and form of payment of such benefits. The director retirement agreements entered into by directors joining the Boards of the Company and the Bank subsequent to the November 2008 amendments (for current directors Bearden and McPhearson) comply with Section 409A.

On January 25, 2017, the agreements with directors Breedlove, Corgill, Gordon, Harrison, Meigs, Whitted and Wilson were again amended to reflect the increase in the mandatory retirement age for Board members from age 70 to age 75, which increase was approved at the Annual Meeting of the Company’s stockholders held on May 9, 2006. Specifically, the January 2017 amendment clarified that the annual increases in the amount of the annual benefit payable pursuant to the agreement will terminate at the end of the plan year (commencing on September 1 and ending on August 31) immediately preceding the date of the first meeting of stockholders of the Company at which directors are elected, following the date on which the director reaches the mandatory retirement age set forth in the Company’s bylaws. No amendments were required to the agreements with directors Bearden and McPhearson to reflect this clarification.

Deferral Plan

Non-employee directors may elect to defer payment of all or any portion of their fees earned as directors under the United Security Bancshares, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferral Plan”). The Deferral Plan, which was ratified by shareholders at the annual meeting held on May 11, 2004, permits non-employee directors to invest their directors’ fees and to receive the adjusted value of the deferred amounts in cash and/or shares of the Company’s common stock. If the deferred amounts are invested in share units, the return is determined as if such funds had been invested in the Company’s common stock, and, if the deferred amounts are invested in cash, the return is calculated at an interest rate equal to the 30-Day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 75 basis points. Deferred amounts generally are distributed to a director at the termination of such individual’s service as a director of the Company, either in a lump sum payment or in annual installment payments. During 2016, ten of our fourteen non-employee directors deferred their directors’ fees under the Deferral Plan.

23

2016 Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding compensation earned by or paid to the Company’s non-employee directors in 2016.

Name(1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2) | Option Awards(3) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation(4) | All Other Compensation(5) | Total
Andrew C. Bearden, Jr. | $33,600 | $4,242 | $26,922 | $1,006 | $65,770
Linda H. Breedlove | $21,250 | $3,030 | $ 3,655 | — | $27,935
Robert Stephen Briggs | $21,000 | $6,060 | — | $ 627 | $27,687
Sheri S. Cook | $21,550 | $6,060 | — | $ 142 | $27,752
Gerald P. Corgill | $22,250 | $3,030 | $ 3,655 | $ 104 | $29,039
John C. Gordon | $27,850 | $3,030 | $ 4,954 | — | $35,834
William G. Harrison | $20,500 | $3,030 | $ 6,851 | — | $30,381
J. Lee McPhearson | $27,800 | $3,030 | $ 8,079 | $1,463 | $40,372
Jack W. Meigs | $21,250 | $3,030 | $ 4,859 | $1,116 | $30,255
Aubrey S. Miller | $24,000 | $6,060 | — | $ 589 | $30,649
Donna D. Smith | $26,400 | $6,060 | — | $ 250 | $32,710
A. J. Strickland, III | $24,000 | $6,060 | — | $ 400 | $30,460
Howard M. Whitted | $24,000 | $3,030 | $ 3,655 | $3,539 | $34,224
Bruce N. Wilson | $25,500 | $3,030 | $ 7,029 | $ 492 | $36,051

(1) | Although Mr. House serves on the Board of Directors in addition to his service as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, he currently receives no additional fees for his service on the Board; therefore, no additional information with respect to Mr. House is presented in this table.

(2) | During 2016, all of our non-employee directors deferred their director fees pursuant to the Deferral Plan, except for Messrs. Harrison, Meigs and Miller and Ms. Smith.

(3) | The amounts presented in this column represent the fair value of the options granted to the directors on the date of grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718.

(4) | This column represents the change in the present value of a director’s accumulated benefit under his or her director retirement agreement.

(5) | This column reflects reimbursements for mileage and related expenses paid to certain non-employee directors. Non-employee directors who must travel outside their county of residence to attend any meeting are reimbursed for mileage. Non-employee directors attending a training meeting, or similar meeting, are compensated at the same level as for attendance at committee meetings.

24

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Donna D. Smith, Chairperson, Andrew C. Bearden, Jr., Robert Stephen Briggs, Sheri S. Cook, John C. Gordon, J. Lee McPhearson and A. J. Strickland, III. Following the Annual Meeting, at which Dr. Strickland will not stand for reelection, the Board anticipates that the Compensation Committee will consist of the remaining current members of the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s charter, Mr. House, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, is permitted to be present at meetings during which executive compensation other than for himself is under review and consideration. No member of the Compensation Committee during 2016 was an executive officer of another company with a board of directors that has a comparable committee on which one of our executive officers serves.

25

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

As of March 7, 2017, no person was known to management to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The following table sets forth the number and percentage of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of March 7, 2017, by (i) the Named Executive Officers; (ii) each director and director nominee of the Company; and (iii) all current executive officers and directors of the Company as a group.

NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER |  | AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1) |  |  | PERCENT OF CLASS |
Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.(2) |  |  | 18,109 |  |  |  | * |
Linda H. Breedlove(3) |  |  | 13,765 |  |  |  | * |
Robert Stephen Briggs(4) |  |  | 25,027 |  |  |  | * |
Sheri S. Cook(5) |  |  | 7,347 |  |  |  | * |
Gerald P. Corgill(6) |  |  | 160,819 |  |  |  | 2.7% |
Thomas S. Elley(7) |  |  | 15,183 |  |  |  | * |
John C. Gordon(8) |  |  | 171,749 |  |  |  | 2.8% |
William G. Harrison(9) |  |  | 61,705 |  |  |  | 1.0% |
James F. House(10) |  |  | 66,997 |  |  |  | 1.1% |
J. Lee McPhearson(11) |  |  | 22,568 |  |  |  | * |
Jack W. Meigs(12) |  |  | 8,845 |  |  |  | * |
Aubrey S. Miller(13) |  |  | 6,400 |  |  |  | * |
William C. Mitchell(14) |  |  | 24,541 |  |  |  | * |
Donna D. Smith(15) |  |  | 8,400 |  |  |  | * |
A. J. Strickland, III(16) |  |  | 17,424 |  |  |  | * |
Howard M. Whitted(17) |  |  | 25,878 |  |  |  | * |
Bruce N. Wilson(18) |  |  | 17,340 |  |  |  | * |
All current directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons) |  |  | 723,159 |  |  |  | 11.9% |

* | Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares.

(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the named person has sole voting and sole investment power for the shares indicated. “Percent of class” is based on (i) 6,055,293 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of March 7, 2017, (ii) 71,175 shares of common stock equivalents held in the Deferral Plan that may be acquired by certain directors within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and (iii) 149,684 shares of common stock that may be acquired by certain directors and executive officers within 60 days of March 7, 2017 pursuant to the exercise of vested stock options. For each individual included in the table above, “Percent of Class” is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person by the sum of (i) 6,055,293 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 7, 2017 and (ii) the number of additional shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 7, 2017, if any. For “All current directors and executive officers as a group,” “Percent of Class” is calculated by dividing the total number of shares beneficially owned by all 19 persons by the sum of (i) the total number of shares outstanding as of March 7, 2017 and (ii) the total number of shares that the members of the group have the right to acquire within 60 days of March 7, 2017. The percentages in this table have been rounded to the nearest tenth. The Company currently has 10,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized for issuance.

(2) | Includes 528 shares owned by Mr. Bearden’s spouse, with respect to which Mr. Bearden disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 2,881 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Bearden may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 6,300 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Bearden received a grant of 467 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(3) | Includes 2,267 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Ms. Breedlove may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Ms. Breedlove received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(4) | Includes 4,027 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Briggs may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 6,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Briggs received a grant of 667 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(5) | Includes 947 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Ms. Cook may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 6,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Ms. Cook received a grant of 667 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

26

(6) | Includes 103,612 shares owned by Mr. Corgill’s spouse, with respect to which Mr. Corgill disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 4,124 shares owned by Dozier Hardware Company, Inc., of which Mr. Corgill is President, 8,583 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Corgill may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Corgill received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date. In January 2015, Mr. Corgill pledged 79,002 shares of the Company’s common stock as collateral in connection with a modification of a loan relationship between the Bank and a business entity owned by Mr. Corgill, which shares were still pledged as of March 7, 2017. These shares are included in the amount presented for Mr. Corgill in the table set forth above.

(7) | Includes 12,183 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017.

(8) | Includes 10,560 shares held jointly with Mr. Gordon’s spouse. Also includes 11,636 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Gordon may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Gordon received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(9) | Includes 264 shares held jointly with Mr. Harrison’s spouse. Also includes 1,119 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Harrison may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Harrison received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(10) | Includes 16,828 shares held in the 401(k) Plan and 25,167 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017.

(11) | Includes 3,000 shares owned by Mr. McPhearson’s spouse, with respect to which Mr. McPhearson disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 8,583 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. McPhearson may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. McPhearson received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(12) | Includes 2,413 shares held jointly with Mr. Meigs’ spouse, 325 shares owned by each of Mr. Meigs’ two sons, with respect to which Mr. Meigs serves as custodian for one son under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of Alabama and disclaims beneficial ownership of all 650 shares, 1,082 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Meigs may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Meigs received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(13) | Includes 6,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Miller received a grant of 667 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(14) | Includes 8,274 shares held in the 401(k) Plan and 16,267 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017.

(15) | Includes 6,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Ms. Smith received a grant of 667 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(16) | Includes 7,924 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Dr. Strickland may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 9,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Dr. Strickland received a grant of 667 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(17) | Includes 19,778 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Whitted may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Whitted received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(18) | Includes 544 shares held jointly with Mr. Wilson’s spouse. Also includes 2,348 shares of common stock equivalents held pursuant to the Deferral Plan, with respect to which Mr. Wilson may acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of March 7, 2017, and 4,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2017. On February 22, 2017, Mr. Wilson received a grant of 333 shares of restricted common stock that will vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.

27

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the directors and executive officers of the Company and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock of the Company. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish to the Company copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, all Section 16(a) reports applicable to the Company’s directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners were timely filed.

28

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of seven directors who are independent directors as defined under the applicable Nasdaq listing rules and the Securities and Exchange Commission rules currently in effect.

The Audit Committee hereby submits the following report:

| ● | We have reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

| ● | We have discussed with the independent auditors, Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC, the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees (as amended), as well as all other matters required to be discussed with the independent auditors by applicable PCAOB standards.

| ● | We have received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors, Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC, required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and have discussed with Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC its independence. We concluded that the provision of non-financial audit services was compatible with Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC’s independence in performing financial audit services.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

It should be noted that management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to monitor and review this process. It is not our duty or our responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures.

This report furnished by the Audit Committee:

A. J. Strickland, III, Chairperson

Andrew C. Bearden, Jr.

Robert Stephen Briggs

Gerald P. Corgill

William G. Harrison

Jack W. Meigs

Donna D. Smith

29

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

At the direction of the Audit Committee, the ratification of the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC (“Carr, Riggs & Ingram”) as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017 is being presented to the shareholders for approval at the Annual Meeting. Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Carr, Riggs & Ingram to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

General

The Audit Committee has approved the engagement of Carr, Riggs & Ingram as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017. Carr, Riggs & Ingram has served as the Company’s principal accountants since August 13, 2008.

A representative from Carr, Riggs & Ingram is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accountants. Pursuant to these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee generally is required to pre-approve the audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accountants in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent registered public accountants has received general pre-approval, the service will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee may pre-approve specific services that are expected to be provided to the Company by the independent registered public accountants during the following twelve months.

Audit and Other Service Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company for the audit and other services provided by Carr, Riggs & Ingram for 2016 and 2015.

|  | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |
Audit Fees |  | $ | 230,000 |  |  | $ | 230,000 |
Audit-Related Fees |  | $ | 24,930 |  |  | $ | 24,905 |
Tax Fees |  |  | -- |  |  |  | -- |
All Other Fees |  |  | -- |  |  |  | -- |

Audit Fees

Audit fees were for professional services rendered relating to the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and the review of financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q.

30

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees were for professional services rendered that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These fees represent the aggregate fees billed for services relating to employee benefit plan audits. All of these services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Tax Fees

Tax fees represent the fees billed for services relating to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. All of these services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

All Other Fees

There were no other fees paid to Carr, Riggs & Ingram for 2016 or 2015.

Vote Required; Board Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this matter is needed to ratify the appointment of Carr, Riggs & Ingram as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017. Unless instructed to the contrary, the shares represented by proxy will be voted FOR this proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017.

31

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that companies provide shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of their named executive officers in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We intend to hold such an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” vote, each year in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders until the next vote on the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote or until our Board of Directors otherwise determines that a different frequency for this advisory vote is in the best interests of our shareholders. Following the advisory vote on the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote at this year’s Annual Meeting (Proposal 4), the next such advisory vote on the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes will occur no later than 2023.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we believe that the compensation of our executive officers should link rewards to business results and shareholders’ returns. We believe that our compensation program should attract, retain and motivate the executive officers necessary for our current and long-term success and should provide the executive officers with a stake in the future of the Company that corresponds to the stake of each of our shareholders.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. To the extent that there is any significant vote against our Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address the concerns of shareholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this matter is required for the adoption of this Proposal, the results of which will be non-binding and advisory in nature.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2016 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

32

PROPOSAL 4

ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTE

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act also provides that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as an advisory vote on executive compensation.

By voting on this Proposal 4, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two or three years. Shareholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

Our Board of Directors has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our shareholders to provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with the Company’s efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters.

We recognize that shareholders may have different views as to the best approach for the Company; therefore, we look forward to hearing from our shareholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.

This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board of Directors in any way. The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote, however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our shareholders.

The proxy card provides shareholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the advisory vote on compensation every one, two or three years, or abstaining); therefore, shareholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE OPTION OF ONCE EVERY YEAR AS THE PREFERRED FREQUENCY FOR ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

33

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 201 8 ANNUAL MEETING

If any shareholder wishes to present a proposal to be included in the proxy materials for the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholder must comply with applicable securities regulations, including providing adequate notice to the Company. Such proposals must be received at the Company’s executive offices on or before November 22, 2017 in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials relating to such meeting.

A shareholder must notify the Company before February 5, 2018 of a proposal for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders that the shareholder intends to present other than by inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials. If the Company does not receive such notice prior to February 5, 2018, then proxies solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company will be deemed to have conferred discretionary authority to vote upon any such matter.

Any proposal must be submitted in writing, by certified mail-return receipt requested, to the following address:

Beverly J. Dozier, Secretary

First US Bancshares, Inc.

131 West Front Street

Post Office Box 249

Thomasville, Alabama 36784

OTHER MATTERS

We do not know of any matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in the notice of the Annual Meeting and discussed in this Proxy Statement.

The Company will furnish to shareholders without charge, upon written request, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the accompanying financial statements and schedules, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2016. Copies of the exhibits to the Form 10-K also will be available upon request. Requests should be made to:

Beverly J. Dozier, Secretary

First US Bancshares, Inc.

131 West Front Street

Post Office Box 249

Thomasville, Alabama 36784

Please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and send it promptly by mail in the envelope provided for this purpose, or vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone using the instructions provided in this Proxy Statement and on your proxy card. The proxy may be revoked by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, by signing and delivering a later-dated proxy card, by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by a later vote via the Internet or by telephone at any time prior to the voting thereof.

34