XML 18 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Financial Instruments - Compound Embedded Derivative (Details) (USD $)
 3 Months Ended 9 Months Ended 0 Months Ended 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Sep. 30, 2012
Jun. 06, 2012
Feb. 03, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Feb. 03, 2012
Senior Secured Promissory Note [Member]
Jun. 06, 2012
Convertible Promissory Note [Member]
Jun. 06, 2012
Compound Embedded Derivative [Member]
Monte Carlo Simulation Technique [Member]
Feb. 03, 2012
Compound Embedded Derivative [Member]
Monte Carlo Simulation Technique [Member]
Sep. 30, 2012
Compound Embedded Derivative [Member]
Monte Carlo Simulation Technique [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]                    
Derivative liability, notional amount           $ 550,000 $ 75,000      
Compound embedded derivatives, change in fair value of derivatives 39,257 (56,989)                
Notional amount               75,000 505,785 532,808
Conversion price (per share)               $ 2.88 $ 21.60 $ 0.79
Linked common shares (shares) 672,737 672,737 26,042 23,416       26,042 [1] 23,416 [1] 672,737 [1]
MCS value per linked common share (per share)               $ 0.60 [2] $ 0.52 [2] $ 0.13 [2]
Total $ 84,765 $ 84,765 $ 15,625 $ 12,151 $ 0     $ 15,625 $ 12,151 $ 84,765
[1] The Compound Embedded Derivative is linked to a variable number of common shares based upon a percentage of the Company's closing stock price as reflected in the over-the-counter market. The number of linked shares will increase as the trading market price decreases and will decrease as the trading market price increases. The fluctuation in the number of linked common shares will have an effect on fair values in future periods.
[2] The Note embodied a contingent conversion feature that was predicated upon a financing transaction that was planned for a date between the issuance date and March 2, 2012. If the financing occurred, the maturity date of the Note was August 2, 2012. If the financing did not occur, the maturity date of the Note was February 2, 2013. While, in hindsight, the financing did not occur, the calculation of value must consider that on the issuance date the contingency was present and resulted in multiple scenarios of outcome as it related to the conversion feature subject to bifurcation. The mechanism for building this contingency into the MCS value was to perform two separate calculations of value and weight them on a reasonable basis.