Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2024
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Guarantees In the course of its business, the Company both provides and receives indemnities which are intended to allocate certain risks associated with business transactions. Similarly, the Company may remain contingently liable for various obligations of a business that has been divested in the event that a third party does not fulfill its obligations under an indemnification obligation. The Company records a liability for indemnification obligations and other contingent liabilities when probable and reasonably estimable. Legal Matters The Company is party to various lawsuits and claims in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty and the impact that the final resolution of such matters will ultimately have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements is not known, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future results of operations or cash flows. The Company settled or resolved certain legal matters during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 that did not individually or in the aggregate have a material impact on the Company’s business or its condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Video Privacy Protection Act: On May 16, 2023, a lawsuit titled Hunthausen v. BuzzFeed, Inc. was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, asserting class action claims for alleged violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”) based on the claimed transmission of personally identifying information via the Meta pixel, Google Analytics, and the TikTok pixel, all of which are purportedly connected to posts on the BuzzFeed.com website. The putative class plaintiff was seeking an injunction to stop further alleged wrongful conduct, to recover unspecified compensatory damages and an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief. The matter was settled on January 4, 2024 and is now disposed. On August 4, 2023, the Company received 8,927 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the Meta pixel, purportedly connected to posts on the BuzzFeed website. Each claimant was seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA. The Company provisionally settled these claims on January 29, 2024 as part of an agreed class action settlement in the matter titled Peters v. BuzzFeed, Inc., pending in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida (the “Circuit Court”). On October 18, 2024, the Circuit Court entered its final judgment and the matter was dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. On August 15, 2023, the Company received (1) 5,247 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the HuffPost.com website; and (2) 12,176 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personal identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the BuzzFeed.com website. Each claimant was seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA, as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and equitable relief. The Company settled these claims on January 16, 2024 and the settlement has since been paid. On October 31, 2023, the Company received 590 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the BuzzFeed.com website. Each claimant was seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA. The Company provisionally settled these claims on January 29, 2024 as part of an agreed class action settlement in the matter titled Peters v. BuzzFeed, Inc., pending in the Circuit Court. On October 18, 2024, the Circuit Court entered its final judgment and the matter was dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. Mass Arbitrations: Two mass arbitrations (the “Arbitrations”) were initiated before the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”) on March 15, 2022 against the Company and certain of its executive officers and directors (together, the “BuzzFeed Defendants”) and Continental Stock Transfer Corporation by 91 individuals previously employed by Legacy BuzzFeed (the “Claimants”). The Claimants alleged that they were harmed when they were allegedly unable to convert their shares of Class B common stock to Class A common stock and sell those shares on December 6, 2021, the first day of trading following the Business Combination, and asserted claims for negligence, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act. The Claimants sought to recover unspecified compensatory damages, an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief. On April 21, 2022, the BuzzFeed Defendants filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to enjoin the Arbitrations on the grounds that, inter alia, the Claimants’ purported causes of action arise from their rights as shareholders of the Company, are governed by the Company’s charter, including its forum selection provision, and are therefore not arbitrable (the “Delaware Action”). The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief. A hearing on the merits of the Delaware Action was held on July 26, 2022. On October 28, 2022, the Court of Chancery granted the Company’s motion to permanently enjoin the Claimants’ arbitration claims. On January 17, 2023, the Claimants filed amended statements of claim in the Arbitrations against BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Corporation, the transfer agent for 890 and, later, the Company. The amended statements of claim likewise allege that the Claimants were harmed when they were allegedly unable to convert their shares of Class B common stock to Class A common stock and sell those shares on the first day of trading following the Business Combination. The Claimants allege claims for breach of contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, misrepresentation, and negligence, and seek to recover unspecified compensatory damages, an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief. On March 29, 2023, BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to enjoin the Arbitrations on the grounds that, inter alia, the Claimants’ purported causes of action arise from their rights as shareholders of the Company, are governed by the Company’s charter, including its forum selection provision, and are therefore not arbitrable. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment. On November 20, 2023, the Court of Chancery heard oral arguments on the Company’s motion for summary judgment and the Claimants’ cross-motion to dismiss the Company’s complaint. On May 15, 2024, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled that the AAA was to determine whether the matter was arbitrable for those claimants who had produced employment agreements containing arbitration clauses. On June 13, 2024, the Company wrote to the AAA requesting that it continue to stay the arbitrations because there remained six claimants who had not established that they had employment agreements containing arbitration clauses and, therefore, the Delaware Chancery Court retained jurisdiction to adjudicate those six claims. Claimants opposed and, on June 18, 2024, the AAA indicated that it planned to move the arbitration forward with respect to the 85 claimants whose claims had been resolved by the Delaware Chancery Court, notwithstanding that six claimants still remained before that court. On September 9, 2024, BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., filed a notice of appeal of the May 15, 2024 decision of the Delaware Chancery Court with the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. The matter is ongoing. California Invasion of Privacy Act On April 11, 2024, a lawsuit titled Chih-Yuan Chang et al. v. BuzzFeed, Inc. was filed against the Company in the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Company, by causing the Sharethrough, IQM, and Dotomi trackers to be installed on website visitors’ internet browsers, is collecting visitors’ personal identifying information without their consent, in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). Plaintiff, additionally, sought class certification. This matter was settled on July 9, 2024 and the case is now disposed. Nasdaq Listing Compliance Minimum Bid Requirement On May 31, 2023, as expected, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq’s Listing Qualifications Department (the “Nasdaq Staff”) notifying the Company that, for the previous 30 consecutive business days, the bid price for the Company’s Class A common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Bid Price Requirement”). In connection with the Company’s application to obtain additional time to regain compliance, as of the opening of business November 30, 2023, the Company’s Class A common stock and warrants were transferred to The Nasdaq Capital Market, which operates in substantially the same manner as The Nasdaq Global Market, where they continue to trade under the symbols “BZFD” and “BZFDW,” respectively. As disclosed in Note 2 herein, to increase the bid price of our Class A common stock, the Company effected the Reverse Stock Split on May 6, 2024. As of May 17, 2024, the closing bid price of the Company’s Class A common stock had been over $1.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive business days. On May 20, 2024, the Nasdaq Staff confirmed that the Company had regained compliance with the Bid Price Requirement. Audit Committee Requirement Patrick Kerins, who was a member of the Company’s board of directors and its audit committee immediately prior to the 2024 Annual Meeting, did not stand for re-election as a director of the Company at that meeting. On April 26, 2024, as expected, the Company received a letter from the Nasdaq Staff notifying the Company that it was no longer in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A), which requires that the audit committees of listed companies have a minimum of three members that satisfy certain criteria for service on the committee (the “Nasdaq Audit Committee Requirement”). The Nasdaq Staff also notified the Company that it had until the earlier of its 2025 annual meeting of stockholders and April 25, 2025 (i.e., one year from the date on which the Company ceased to be compliant) to regain compliance. On June 11, 2024, Gregory Coleman, already a member of the Company’s board of directors, was appointed to the audit committee of the board. Following the Company’s notice to the Nasdaq Staff of Mr. Coleman’s appointment to the audit committee, the Nasdaq Staff determined that the Company had regained compliance with the Nasdaq Audit Committee Requirement

In the course of its business, the Company both provides and receives indemnities which are intended to allocate certain risks associated with business transactions. Similarly, the Company may remain contingently liable for various obligations of a business that has been divested in the event that a third party does not fulfill its obligations under an indemnification obligation. The Company records a liability for indemnification obligations and other contingent liabilities when probable and reasonably estimable.

The Company is party to various lawsuits and claims in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty and the impact that the final resolution of such matters will ultimately have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements is not known, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future results of operations or cash flows.

The Company settled or resolved certain legal matters during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 that did not individually or in the aggregate have a material impact on the Company’s business or its condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On May 16, 2023, a lawsuit titled Hunthausen v. BuzzFeed, Inc. was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, asserting class action claims for alleged violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”) based on the claimed transmission of personally identifying information via the Meta pixel, Google Analytics, and the TikTok pixel, all of which are purportedly connected to posts on the BuzzFeed.com website. The putative class plaintiff was seeking an injunction to stop further alleged wrongful conduct, to recover unspecified compensatory damages and an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief. The matter was settled on January 4, 2024 and is now disposed.

On August 4, 2023, the Company received 8,927 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the Meta pixel, purportedly connected to posts on the BuzzFeed website. Each claimant was seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA. The Company provisionally settled these claims on January 29, 2024 as part of an agreed class action settlement in the matter titled Peters v. BuzzFeed, Inc., pending in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida (the “Circuit Court”). On October 18, 2024, the Circuit Court entered its final judgment and the matter was dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.

On August 15, 2023, the Company received (1) 5,247 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the HuffPost.com website; and (2) 12,176 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personal identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the BuzzFeed.com website. Each claimant was

seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA, as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and equitable relief. The Company settled these claims on January 16, 2024 and the settlement has since been paid.

On October 31, 2023, the Company received 590 individual demands for JAMS arbitration in California, all of which allege that the Company violated the VPPA by transmitting personally identifying information via the use of various pixels purportedly in connection with the BuzzFeed.com website. Each claimant was seeking to recover damages in the amount of $2,500 (actual dollars) for each alleged violation of the VPPA. The Company provisionally settled these claims on January 29, 2024 as part of an agreed class action settlement in the matter titled Peters v. BuzzFeed, Inc., pending in the Circuit Court. On October 18, 2024, the Circuit Court entered its final judgment and the matter was dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.

Two mass arbitrations (the “Arbitrations”) were initiated before the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”) on March 15, 2022 against the Company and certain of its executive officers and directors (together, the “BuzzFeed Defendants”) and Continental Stock Transfer Corporation by 91 individuals previously employed by Legacy BuzzFeed (the “Claimants”). The Claimants alleged that they were harmed when they were allegedly unable to convert their shares of Class B common stock to Class A common stock and sell those shares on December 6, 2021, the first day of trading following the Business Combination, and asserted claims for negligence, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act. The Claimants sought to recover unspecified compensatory damages, an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief.

On April 21, 2022, the BuzzFeed Defendants filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to enjoin the Arbitrations on the grounds that, inter alia, the Claimants’ purported causes of action arise from their rights as shareholders of the Company, are governed by the Company’s charter, including its forum selection provision, and are therefore not arbitrable (the “Delaware Action”). The complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief. A hearing on the merits of the Delaware Action was held on July 26, 2022. On October 28, 2022, the Court of Chancery granted the Company’s motion to permanently enjoin the Claimants’ arbitration claims.

On January 17, 2023, the Claimants filed amended statements of claim in the Arbitrations against BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Corporation, the transfer agent for 890 and, later, the Company. The amended statements of claim likewise allege that the Claimants were harmed when they were allegedly unable to convert their shares of Class B common stock to Class A common stock and sell those shares on the first day of trading following the Business Combination. The Claimants allege claims for breach of contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, misrepresentation, and negligence, and seek to recover unspecified compensatory damages, an award of costs, and any further appropriate relief.

On March 29, 2023, BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to enjoin the Arbitrations on the grounds that, inter alia, the Claimants’ purported causes of action arise from their rights as shareholders of the Company, are governed by the Company’s charter, including its forum selection provision, and are therefore not arbitrable. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment.

On November 20, 2023, the Court of Chancery heard oral arguments on the Company’s motion for summary judgment and the Claimants’ cross-motion to dismiss the Company’s complaint. On May 15, 2024, the Delaware Chancery Court ruled that the AAA was to determine whether the matter was arbitrable for those claimants who had produced employment agreements containing arbitration clauses. On June 13, 2024, the Company wrote to the AAA requesting that it continue to stay the arbitrations because there remained six claimants who had not established that they had employment agreements containing arbitration clauses and, therefore, the Delaware Chancery Court retained jurisdiction to adjudicate those six claims. Claimants opposed and, on June 18, 2024, the AAA indicated that it planned to move the arbitration forward with respect to the 85 claimants whose claims had been resolved by the Delaware Chancery Court, notwithstanding that six claimants still remained before that court. On September 9, 2024, BuzzFeed Media Enterprises, Inc., filed a notice of appeal of the May 15, 2024 decision of the Delaware Chancery Court with the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. The matter is ongoing.

On April 11, 2024, a lawsuit titled Chih-Yuan Chang et al. v. BuzzFeed, Inc. was filed against the Company in the Southern District of New York, alleging that the Company, by causing the Sharethrough, IQM, and Dotomi trackers to be installed on website visitors’ internet browsers, is collecting visitors’ personal identifying information without their consent, in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). Plaintiff, additionally, sought class certification. This matter was settled on July 9, 2024 and the case is now disposed.

On May 31, 2023, as expected, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq’s Listing Qualifications Department (the “Nasdaq Staff”) notifying the Company that, for the previous 30 consecutive business days, the bid price for the Company’s Class A common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Bid Price Requirement”). In connection with the Company’s application to obtain additional time to regain compliance, as of the opening of business November 30, 2023, the Company’s Class A common stock and warrants were transferred to The Nasdaq Capital Market, which operates in substantially the same manner as The Nasdaq Global Market, where they continue to trade under the symbols “BZFD” and “BZFDW,” respectively. As disclosed in Note 2 herein, to increase the bid price of our Class A common stock, the Company effected the Reverse Stock Split on May 6, 2024. As of May 17, 2024, the closing bid price of the Company’s Class A common stock had been over $1.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive business days. On May 20, 2024, the Nasdaq Staff confirmed that the Company had regained compliance with the Bid Price Requirement.