XML 29 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Principles of consolidation - The consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, include the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of all subsidiaries. Intercompany balances, transactions and cash flows are eliminated on consolidation.

 

Goodwill - The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded on the balance sheet as goodwill. The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”, which requires the carrying value of goodwill to be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The Company regularly conducted annual impairment evaluation. The impairment test requires the Company to estimate the fair value of our reporting units. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of that reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company proceeds to step two of the impairment analysis. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets) in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The resulting implied fair value of the goodwill that results from the application of the second step is then compared to the carrying amount of the goodwill and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with the past performance of each reporting unit and are consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in current operating plans. Such assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions.

 

During fiscal 2014, based on the result of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis, the Company determined that the fair value of electronic division was less than its carrying value as of March 31, 2014 and, as such, the Company applied the second step of the goodwill impairment test to this segment. Based on the result of the second step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company recorded a $392 impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill in electronic division for the year ended March 31, 2014. The entire goodwill was fully impaired. Please refer to note 9 - goodwill for details.

 

Cash and cash equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash accounts, interest bearing savings accounts and time certificates of deposit with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.

 

Marketable securities - All marketable securities are classified as trading securities and are stated at fair market value. Market value is determined by the most recently traded price of the security at the balance sheet date. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are included in non-operating income. The cost of investments sold is based on the average cost method. Interest and dividend income earned are included in non-operating income.

 

Available-for-sales securities - Available-for-sale securities are investments in debt securities that have readily determinable fair values not classified as trading securities or as held-to-maturity securities. All available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value and represent securities that are available to meet liquidity and/or other needs of the Company. Gains and losses are recognized and reported separately in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss upon realization or when impairment of values is deemed to be other than temporary. In estimating other-than temporary impairment losses, management considers, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains or losses are recognized using the specific identification method. Unrealized holding gains and losses for securities available-for-sale are excluded from the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss and reported net of taxes in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders' equity until realized.

 

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the weighted average basis. Work-in-progress and finished goods inventories consist of raw materials, direct labour and overhead associated with the manufacturing process. The Company periodically performs an analysis of inventory to determine obsolete or slow-moving inventory and determine if its cost exceeds the estimated market value. Write down of potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory are recorded based on management’s analysis of inventory levels.

 

Assets held for sale – When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If in management’s opinion, the estimated net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale and/or disposed of are presented as Asset held for sale for all periods presented. If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of th subsequent decision not to sell.

 

Property, plant and equipment - Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost including the cost of improvements. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are provided on the straight line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

 

Leasehold land and buildings 30 - 50 years
Plant and machinery 5 - 15 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 4 - 5 years
Motor vehicles 3 - 5 years
Leasehold improvements 2 - 5 years

Leases - Leases are classified at the inception date as either a capital lease or an operating lease. For the lessee, a lease is a capital lease if any of the following conditions exist: a) ownership is transferred to the lessee by the end of the lease term, b) there is a bargain purchase option, c) the lease term is at least 75% of the property’s estimated remaining economic life or d) the present value of the minimum lease payments at the beginning of the lease term is 90% or more of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at the inception date. For the lessor, in addition to the four criteria mentioned above, a capital lease has to meet both of the following incremental criteria: a) the collectability of the minimum lease payments under the lease has to be reasonable predictable, and b) no important uncertainties surround the amount of unreimbursable costs yet to be incurred by the lessor under the lease.

 

For the lessee, a capital lease is accounted for as if there was an acquisition of an asset and an incurrence of an obligation at the inception of the lease. All other leases are accounted for as operating leases. The total rental payments made under the leases are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss as incurred. For the lessor, a capital lease is accounted for as sale-type lease, direct financing lease or leveraged lease. All other leases are accounted for as operating leases. Revenues are recorded to statement of comprehensive loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company has no capital leases as a lessee or lessor for any of the periods presented.

 

Impairment of long-lived assets - Long-lived assets are included in impairment evaluations when events and circumstances exist that indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. In accordance with ASC No. 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, the Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets by first grouping its long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities (the asset group) and, secondly, estimating the undiscounted future cash flows that are directly associated with and expected to arise from the use of and eventual disposition of such asset group. The Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset within the asset group. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge to the extent the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company determines fair value through quoted market prices in active markets or, if quotations of market prices are unavailable, through the performance of internal analysis using a discounted cash flow methodology. The undiscounted and discounted cash flow analyses based on a number of estimates and assumptions, including the expected period over which the asset will be utilized, projected future operating results of the asset group, discount rate and long-term growth rate.

 

In evaluation of undiscounted projected cash-flows associated with those assets, the Company assessed that certain of long-lived assets at the reporting date to be less than the fair value and the sum of undiscounted cash flows. Accordingly, the Company impaired that the carrying values of long-lived assets of $490, $nil and $nil for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

 

Revenue recognition - Sales of goods are recognized when goods are shipped, title of goods sold has passed to the purchaser, the price is fixed or determinable as stated on the sales contracts and/or orders, and its collectability is reasonably assured. Customers do not have a general right of return on products shipped. The Company permits the return of damaged or defective products and accounts for these actual returns as deduction from sales. Products returns to the Company were insignificant during past years.

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) - Other comprehensive income for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 represented unrealized gain/ (loss) on available-for-sale securities and were included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

 

Allowance for doubtful account - The Company regularly monitors and assesses the risk of not collecting amounts owed to the Company by customers. This evaluation is based upon a variety of factors including: ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition, an analysis of amounts current and past due along with relevant history and facts particular to the customer. Based upon the results of this analysis, the Company records an allowance for uncollectible accounts for this risk. This analysis requires the Company to make significant estimates, and changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Unanticipated changes in the liquidity or financial position of the Company’s customers may require additional provisions for doubtful accounts.

 

   Year ended March 31,
Allowance for doubtful account  2014  2015  2016
          
Balance at beginning of the year  $574   $534   $607 
Provision for the year   34    216    376 
Bad debt recovery   (53)   (143)   (102)
Written off during the year   (21)   —      —   
Exchange difference   —      —      —   
   $534   $607   $881 

 

The provision and the bad debt recovery for the years were charged to other income (expenses) in consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.

 

Shipping and handling cost - Shipping and handling costs related to the delivery of finished goods are included in selling expenses. During the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, shipping and handling costs expensed to selling expenses were $650, $514 and $458, respectively.

 

Income taxes - Income taxes are provided on an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Any PRC tax paid by subsidiaries during the year is recorded. Deferred income taxes are recognized for all significant temporary differences at enacted rates and classified as current or non-current based upon the classification of the related asset or liability in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion of, or all, the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company classifies interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as a component of income tax provisions.

 

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC No. 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740 also provides accounting guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, disclosure and transition. 

 

Foreign currency translation - The consolidated financial statements of the Company are presented in U.S. dollars as the Company is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands where the currency is the U.S. dollar. The Company's subsidiaries conduct substantially all of their business in U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars or Chinese Renminbi. Notwithstanding this, U.S. dollar is considered by management to be the most appropriate functional currency of the Company’s subsidiaries because most of our customers contracted with our subsidiaries in U.S. dollars.

 

All transactions in currencies other than functional currencies during the year are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Monetary items existing at the balance sheet date denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies are translated at period end rates. Gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign currency transactions and balances are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. 

 

The exchange rates between the Hong Kong dollars and the U.S. dollar were approximately 7.7558, 7.7524 and 7.7904 as of March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The exchange rates between the Chinese Renminbi and the U.S. dollar were approximately 6.196, 6.2456 and 6.5698 as of March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. 

 

Aggregate net foreign currency transaction gain (loss) included in other income were $40, $(205) and $(559) for the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. 

 

Post-retirement and post-employment benefits - The Company and its subsidiaries contribute to a state pension scheme in respect of its Chinese employees.

 

Stock-based compensation - The Company adopts ASC No. 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, which requires that share-based payment transactions with employees, such as share options, be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instrument issued and recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period, with a corresponding addition to equity. Under this method, compensation cost related to employee share options or similar equity instruments is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which generally is the vesting period.

 

For the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Company records stock-based compensation expenses amounted to $nil, $199 and $nil in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss respectively. There is no tax benefit recognized in relation to the stock-based compensation expenses incurred for the three years.

 

The fair value of options granted in the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were estimated using the Binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions:

   Year ended March 31,
   2014  2015  2016
          
Risk-free interest rate – weighted average   N/A    2.606%   N/A 
Expected life of options – weighted average   N/A    10 years    N/A 
Stock volatility   N/A    44.37%   N/A 
Expected dividend yield   N/A    7.8%   N/A 

 

The Company applied judgment in estimating key assumptions in determining the fair value of the stock options on the date of grant. The Company used historical data to estimate the expected life of options, stock volatility and expected dividend yield. The risk-free interest rate of the option was based on the 10 years U.S. Treasury yield at time of grant.

 

Net loss per share - Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is adjusted to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued. In computing the dilutive effect of potential common shares, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of treasury shares assumed to be purchased with the proceeds from the exercise of options.

 

Basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share calculated in accordance with ASC No. 260, “Earnings Per Share”, are reconciled as follows (shares in thousands):

 

   Year ended March 31,
   2014  2015  2016
Net loss attributable to Deswell Industries, Inc.:               
Loss from continuing operations  $(7,079)  $(2,460)  $(4,934)
Loss from discontinued operations   (411)   (348)   —   
Net loss attributable to Deswell Industries, Inc.  $(7,490)  $(2,808)  $(4,934)
                
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding   16,186    16,056    16,056 
                
Basic net loss per share:               
Loss from continuing operations per share  $(0.43)  $(0.15)  $(0.31)
Loss from discontinued operations per share   (0.03)   (0.02)   —   
Basic net loss per share  $(0.46)  $(0.17)  $(0.31)
                
                

 

   Year ended March 31,
   2014  2015  2016
          
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding   16,186    16,056    16,056 
Effect of dilutive securities – Options   —      —      —   
Diluted weighted average common and potential common
shares outstanding
   16,186    16,056    16,056 
                
Diluted net loss per share               
Loss from continuing operations per share  $(0.43)  $(0.15)  $(0.31)
Loss from discontinued operations per share   (0.03)   (0.02)   —   
Diluted net loss per share  $(0.46)  $(0.17)  $(0.31)
                

 

For the years ended March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, potential common shares of nil, 532,000 and 532,000 shares related to stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their exercise prices were higher than the average market price.

 

As of March 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, 132,000, nil and nil shares related to stock options are excluded from the calculations of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Fair value of financial instruments - The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the exchange price that would be received from an asset or paid to transfer a liability (as exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, time deposits, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and other current liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments and market rates of interest.

 

Fair value measurements - The Company has adopted ASC No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. 

 

Its establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy of valuation techniques based on observable and unobservable inputs, which may be used to measure fair value and include the following: 

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

 

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques based on significant unobservable inputs, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

 

Classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. 

 

Non-recurring fair value measurements - Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using mostly Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. Assets that are written down to fair value when impaired and retained investments are not subsequently adjusted to fair value unless further impairment occurs.

 

Fair value of long-lived assets, including real estate, are determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows (which are unobservable inputs) and discounting them using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. The Company estimates future cash flows based on its experience and knowledge of the market. Significant increases or decreases in actual cash flows may result in valuation changes. For real estate, fair values are based on discounted cash flow estimates which reflect current and projected lease profiles and available industry information about capitalization rates and expected trends in rents and occupancy and are corroborated by external appraisals.

Discontinued Operations – For the year ended March 31, 2015, the Company sold all of the assets of metallic segment. The operating results of metallic segment are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for all periods presented. For the breakdown of the assets and liabilities of metallic segment, please see note 10 – discontinued operations.

 

Recent changes in accounting standards – In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). It requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement. In addition, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will no longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. The standard also allows entities to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, clarifies that all cash payments made on an employee’s behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity on the cash flow statement, and provides an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. For public business entities, this ASU should be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842). It requires that lessees recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms greater than twelve months in the statement of financial position. ASU 2016-02 also requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public business entities, this ASU should be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01- Financial InstrumentsOverall (Subtopic 825-10). It requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables), and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. For public business entities, this ASU should be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance permits early adoption of the own credit provision. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 - Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments may be applied prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 is not expected to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 - Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments require an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method. The amendments do not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A reporting entity should apply the amendments prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have material impact on its consolidated financial statements.