XML 39 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Jan. 29, 2012
Income Taxes
15.  Income Taxes

Effective Income Tax Rate

We recorded an income tax benefit of $1.2 million, or (13.4)% of income before income tax expense, for the nine month period ended January 29, 2012, compared to income tax expense of $213,000, or 2.1% of income before income tax expense, for the nine month period ended January 30, 2011. Our effective income tax rates for the nine month periods ended January 29, 2012, and January 30, 2011, were based upon the estimated effective income tax rate applicable for the full year after giving effect to any significant items related specifically to interim periods. The effective income tax rate can be affected over the fiscal year by the mix and timing of actual earnings from our U.S. operations and foreign sources versus annual projections and changes in foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar.
 
The effective income tax rate of (13.4)% for the nine month period ended January 29, 2012 is different from the amount obtained by applying our statutory rate of 34% to income before income taxes for the following reasons:

  
The effective income tax rate was reduced by 50% for a reduction in our valuation allowance associated with our U.S. net deferred income tax assets. This 50% reduction in our effective income tax rate is due to a change in judgment about the realization of our U.S. net deferred income tax assets in future years. Since the realization of our U.S. net deferred income tax assets is a result of a change in judgment about future years, we recorded an income tax benefit of $4.4 million that represents a discrete event in which the full tax effects were recorded for the nine month period ending January 29, 2012.

  
The effective income tax rate was reduced by 7% for taxable income subject to lower statutory income tax rates in foreign jurisdictions (Canada and China) compared with the statutory income tax rate of 34% for the United States.

  
The effective income tax rate was increased 7% for an increase in unrecognized tax benefits.

  
The effective income tax rate was increased by 2.6% for stock-based compensation and other miscellaneous items.

The effective income tax rate of 2.1% for the nine month period ended January 30, 2011 is different from the amount obtained by applying our statutory rate of 34% to income before income taxes for the following reasons:

  
The effective income tax rate was reduced by 31% for a reduction in our valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred income tax assets. Of this 31% reduction in our effective income tax rate, 19% and 12% pertain to our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. The 19% reduction in our effective income tax rate from our U.S. operations is due to the realization of our U.S. net deferred income tax assets from ordinary taxable income projected for fiscal 2011. Since the realization of our U.S. net deferred income tax assets were from ordinary taxable income in the current fiscal year, its tax effects are included in the computation of the annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2011. The 12% reduction in our effective income tax rate from our China operations is due to a change in judgment about the realization of our China net deferred income tax assets in future years. Since the realization of our China net deferred income tax assets is a result of a change in judgment about future years, we recorded an income tax benefit of $1.3 million that represents a discrete event in which the full tax effects were recorded for the nine month period ended January 30, 2011.

  
The income tax rate was reduced by 7% for taxable income subject to lower statutory income tax rates in foreign jurisdictions (Canada and China) compared with the statutory income tax rate of 34% for the United States.

  
The income tax rate was reduced by 3% for adjustments made to our Canadian deferred income tax liabilities and associated with our election to file our Canadian income tax returns in U.S. dollars commencing with our fiscal 2011 tax year. Our Canadian income tax returns were filed in Canadian dollars for fiscal years prior to fiscal 2011. This adjustment totaled $315,000 and represented a discrete event in which the full tax effects were recorded during the nine-month period ended January 30, 2011.
 
  
The income tax rate increased 9% for an increase in unrecognized tax benefits. This 9% increase in the income tax rate also includes an income tax benefit of $107,000 or a reduction in the income tax rate of 1% for the subsequent recognition of unrecognized tax benefits. This adjustment of $107,000 represents a discrete event in which the full tax effects were recorded during the nine month period ended January 30, 2011.

  
The income tax rate was increased by 0.1% for stock-based compensation and other miscellaneous items.

Deferred Income Taxes
 
Summary
 
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation allowance is required. ASC Topic 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard, with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Since the company operates in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law. Based on our assessments, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $12.1 million and $16.4 million against our net deferred income tax assets associated with our U.S. operations at January 29, 2012, and May 1, 2011, respectively. No valuation allowance has been recorded against our net deferred income tax assets associated with our operations located in China, Canada, and Europe.
 
United States
 
Our net deferred income tax asset regarding our U.S. operations primarily pertains to incurring significant U.S. pre-tax losses over prior fiscal years, with U.S. loss carryforwards totaling $60.0 million at May 1, 2011. Due to the favorable results of our multi-year restructuring process in our upholstery fabric operations and key acquisitions and capital investments made for our mattress fabric segment, on a cumulative three-year basis ending May 1, 2011 (the end of our fiscal 2011), our U.S. operations earned a pre-tax income of $4.2 million. In addition, our U.S. operations reported a pre-tax income over fiscal years 2011 and 2010 totaling $8.2 million. We believe that fiscal years 2011 and 2010 are a more indicative measure of future pre-tax income as these fiscal years reflect operating performance after the cost savings of recent profit-improvement and restructuring plans were realized, as well as the full operational effects of the acquisitions associated with the company’s mattress fabric operations located in the U.S.
 
This improvement continued through the second quarter of fiscal 2012, as our U.S. operations earned a cumulative pretax income through the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and fiscal years 2011 and 2010 totaling $10.0 million. This continued earnings improvement from our U.S. operations was driven by our mattress fabric operations (which primarily resides in the U.S.). During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, our mattress fabric operations had net sales totaling $35.2 million compared with $28.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. In addition, our mattress fabric operations had operating income totaling $3.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared with $3.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. These improved results in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which were better than expected, can be attributed to increased sales from our sales and marketing initiatives and new programs with customers who are leading suppliers in the bedding industry.  Collectively, these developments increased our confidence in forecasting U.S. taxable income through fiscal 2014 in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Based on the continuation of these trends in the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we maintain our position that we can forecast U.S. taxable income through 2014. During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, our mattress fabric operations had net sales totaling $34.7 million compared with $28.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. In addition, our mattress fabric operations had operating income totaling $3.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 compared with $2.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
 
Although our U.S. operations have reported pre-tax income on a cumulative three-year basis, the significant uncertainty in the overall economic climate, has made it very difficult to forecast medium and long-term financial results associated with our U.S. operations. Since it will take a significant period of time for our U.S. operations to realize its U.S. net deferred income tax assets based on earned and forecasted U.S. pre-tax income levels, we believe it is too uncertain to project U.S. pre-tax income levels associated with our U.S. operations after fiscal 2014 that support a “more likely than not” assertion at the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2012.
 
Based on the positive and negative evidence noted above, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $12.1 million at January 29, 2012, against the net deferred income tax assets associated with our U.S. operations that are expected to reverse beyond fiscal 2014 and we recognized an income tax benefit of $4.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 for the reduction in this valuation allowance for projected U.S. taxable income in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 to reduce our U.S. loss carryforwards.
 
Overall
 
The recorded valuation allowance of $12.1 million has no effect on our operations, loan covenant compliance, or the possible realization of the U.S. income tax loss carryforwards in the future. If it is determined that it is “more likely than not” that we will realize any of these U.S. income tax loss carryforwards, an income tax benefit would be recognized at that time.
 
At January 29, 2012, the current deferred income tax asset of $2.8 million represents $2.5 million and $256,000 from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At May 1, 2011, the current deferred income tax asset of $293,000 pertains to our operations located in China. At May 1, 2011, the current deferred income tax liability of $82,000 pertains to our operations located in Canada. At January 29, 2012, the non-current deferred income tax asset of $3.9 million represents $2.8 million and $1.1 million from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At May 1, 2011, the non-current deferred income tax asset of $3.6 million represents $2.3 million and $1.3 million from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At January 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, the non-current deferred income tax liability of $659,000 and $596,000 pertains to our operations located in Canada.

Uncertainty In Income Taxes

At January 29, 2012, we had $12.3 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $4.0 million represents the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. Of the $12.3 million in gross unrecognized tax benefits as of January 29, 2012, $8.3 million were classified as net non-current deferred income taxes and $4.0 million were classified as income taxes payable –long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
At May 1, 2011, we had $11.7 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $4.2 million would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. Of the $11.7 million in total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of May 1, 2011, $7.5 million were classified as net non-current deferred income taxes and $4.2 million were classified as income taxes payable – long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

We estimate that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will increase by approximately $1.0 million for fiscal 2012. This increase primarily relates to double taxation under applicable tax treaties with foreign tax jurisdictions.